RE: ADSL problem & rp-pppoe
Title: RE: ADSL problem & rp-pppoe Hi List. Hi Kevin, I haven't tried with the source *.rpm, but I will work on it. Thanks in advanced, I will sumarize. Best Regards -Original Message- From: Kevin MacNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Domingo, 08 de Septiembre de 2002 12:21 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ADSL problem & rp-pppoe On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:51:40PM -0500, Euriel Gómez Raga wrote: > I'm running redhat 7.3 , on a celeron computer, this has 192 Mb ram, > and has 3 nics, that seems to be working ok with no problems. I have > installed rp-pppoe-3.5, but it is not working well on my machine. I ran into the same kind of trouble when I last had a pppoe connection. I didn't really try to investigate what was going on, since the problem went away when I uninstalled the binary and then downloaded and recompiled the latest rp-ppoe.*.src.rpm on my machine. Don't know if it'll work for you, but it's worth a try anyway... -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: ADSL problem & rp-pppoe
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:51:40PM -0500, Euriel Gómez Raga wrote: > I'm running redhat 7.3 , on a celeron computer, this has 192 Mb ram, > and has 3 nics, that seems to be working ok with no problems. I have > installed rp-pppoe-3.5, but it is not working well on my machine. I ran into the same kind of trouble when I last had a pppoe connection. I didn't really try to investigate what was going on, since the problem went away when I uninstalled the binary and then downloaded and recompiled the latest rp-ppoe.*.src.rpm on my machine. Don't know if it'll work for you, but it's worth a try anyway... -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ADSL problem & rp-pppoe
Title: ADSL problem & rp-pppoe Hi members of the list. I have a couple of questions and would be great for me if anyone of you would help me. I want to connect my pc to internet by ASDL modem, I downloaded the rp-pppoe-3.5 for going ahead. I'm running redhat 7.3 , on a celeron computer, this has 192 Mb ram, and has 3 nics, that seems to be working ok with no problems. I have installed rp-pppoe-3.5, but it is not working well on my machine. One of the nics eth0 is configured as dinamyc (dhcp) with no ip-address, it is set as dinamyc, and in this the nic that is connected to the ADLS modem, the others 2 nics have ip adress set (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) I installed rp-pppoe-3.5 with no problems, but when I run the command adsl-start, I got the following messages in the log /var/log/messages Sep 6 18:34:32 mxfw pppd[1355]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests Sep 6 18:34:32 mxfw pppd[1355]: Connection terminated. Sep 6 18:34:32 mxfw /etc/hotplug/net.agent: NET unregister event not supported Sep 6 18:34:36 mxfw pppoe[1356]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets Sep 6 18:34:36 mxfw pppd[1355]: Exit. My ifconfig -a display the following. eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:B0:3C:7D:4C UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:96 (96.0 b) Interrupt:9 Base address:0x3000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:95:E4:80 inet addr:129.179.46.191 Bcast:129.179.46.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2118 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:544 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:597191 (583.1 Kb) TX bytes:47470 (46.3 Kb) Interrupt:10 Base address:0xecc0 eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:B0:D0:14:97:91 inet addr:129.179.46.192 Bcast:129.179.46.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1470 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:1 frame:0 TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 Any ideas... or comments ? to help me to solve this. Thanks in advanced
