Can't View Kernel Bugzilla Bug
I've been having occasional mysterious freezes on a Dell PowerEdge 2550 server with Perc hardware RAID for the last year or so. This has persisted through various versions of the kernel, etc. The problem has seemed to be VM related (although the server is colocated, so I haven't been able to investigate it in depth when it's happened, which has been perhaps six times in the last year). Well, the recent kernel upgrade to 2.4.20-20.7 mentions an obscure bug fix (#100739) that seems to have something to do with VM and sounds like it was discovered on Dell Machines with Perc RAID. I'm hoping this is the fix for what I've been seeing, as it has been a serious problem for me. However, I can't view the bugzilla bug report for it to see the details of what the actual problem was -- when I try doing so by following the link in the RHN update announcement: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100739 ... it tells me "You are not authorized to access bug #100739", even if I create a bugzilla account. Anyone know how I might be able to view the details of this bug so I can see if it matches my symptoms? I would love to know that this bug has been fixed. Thanks! -- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugzilla down?
Anybody else able to connect to bugzilla? Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Best practices for setting up Bugzilla / CVS server?
Benjamin J. Weiss, On Thursday July 17, 2003 10:55, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > We need to get a handle on our versioning and bug tracking at work, so I > was thinking of putting together a RH 9 box and installing Bugzilla and > CVS. I'm curious if anybody out there ran into any "gotchas" that I > should watch out for before I start. > > My current plan is to install the CVS RPM that comes with RH 9, and then > to d/l and compile the Bugzilla source tarball. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! I hate going a little off of your request but, have you looked at GForge? It is based on the SourceForge code and has been made much easier to install with lots of improvements. I've been using it (in beta) and really like it compared to other things. It's now out as a final. http://gforge.org/ -- Brian Ashe CTO Dee-Web Software Services, LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dee-web.com/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Best practices for setting up Bugzilla / CVS server?
We need to get a handle on our versioning and bug tracking at work, so I was thinking of putting together a RH 9 box and installing Bugzilla and CVS. I'm curious if anybody out there ran into any "gotchas" that I should watch out for before I start. My current plan is to install the CVS RPM that comes with RH 9, and then to d/l and compile the Bugzilla source tarball. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Bugzilla server on Red Hat 9?
I'm trying to set up Bugzilla on a server running Red Hat Linux 9. I've got a package for bugzilla itself (version 2.17.1) that is working fine on Red Hat 7.3, so no problem there (I think), but I'm having a hard time getting all the perl dependencies right - and I don't know if I can use the 7.3 packages due to perl version differences. Has anyone successfully installed Bugzilla on Red Hat 9? Have you got RPMs for the various perl modules needed? (The ones that aren't supplied with the Red Hat distribution that is.) -- - Toralf -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugzilla installation
Hi , Need to install bugzilla on redhat 8.0, tried a lot but could not be able to install properly. Is there any site I can get bugzilla in the form of rpm??? please help me out I downloaded complete bugzilla from http://www.softwaretesting.de/article/view/33/1/8/ but again getting lot off errors. I downloaded the gunzip file, did gunzip & tar xvf. Help me out to overcome with this problem, just I need some tips to make clean installation.. Thanks & Regards, santosh Ph: 5202424, 5273061 ext 102 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugzilla installation
Hi guys, Struggling a lot to get work with bugzilla bug tracking tool, system is loaded with redhat 8.0 and installed all required packages and when I run checksetup.pl get the following o/ps Checking forData::Dumper (any) ok: found v2.12 Checking for Date::Parse (any) ok: found v2.27 Checking for DBI (v1.13) ok: found v1.30 Checking for DBD::mysql (v1.2209) not found Checking for File::Spec (v0.82) ok: found v0.83 Checking for File::Temp (any) ok: found v0.13 Checking forTemplate (v2.07)not found Checking for Text::Wrap (v2001.0131) ok: found v2001.0929 The following Perl modules are optional: Checking for GD (v1.20)not found Checking for Chart::Base (v0.99)not found Checking for XML::Parser (any) ok: found v2.31 Checking for GD::Graph (any) not found Checking for GD::Text::Align (any) not found If you you want to see graphical bug charts (plotting historical data over time), you should install libgd and the following Perl modules: GD: perl -MCPAN -e'install "GD"' Chart 0.99b: perl -MCPAN -e'install "N/NI/NINJAZ/Chart-0.99b.tar.gz"' If you you want to see graphical bug reports (bar, pie and line charts of current data), you should install libgd and the following Perl modules: GD: perl -MCPAN -e'install "GD"' GD::Graph: perl -MCPAN -e'install "GD::Graph"' GD::Text::Align: perl -MCPAN -e'install "GD::Text::Align"' Bugzilla requires some Perl modules which are either missing from your system, or the version on your system is too old. They can be installed by running (as root) the following: perl -MCPAN -e 'install "DBD::mysql"' Minimum version required: 1.2209 perl -MCPAN -e 'install "Template"' Minimum version required: 2.07 -- If I run perl -MCPAN -e'install "GD"' Build JPEG support? [y] Build FreeType support? [y] Build XPM support? [y] If you experience compile problems, please check the @INC, @LIBPATH and @LIBS arrays defined in Makefile.PL and manually adjust, if necessary. WARNING: CAPI is not a known parameter. Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Warning: prerequisite Math::Trig 1 not found. Writing Makefile for GD cp GD/Polyline.pm blib/lib/GD/Polyline.pm cp qd.pl blib/lib/qd.pl cp GD.pm blib/lib/GD.pm AutoSplitting blib/lib/GD.pm (blib/lib/auto/GD) /usr/bin/perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap GD.xs > GD.xsc && mv GD.xsc GD.c gcc -c -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/gd -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-aliasing -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/gdbm -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -DVERSION=\"2.07\" -DXS_VERSION=\"2.07\" -fpic "-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE" -DHAVE_JPEG -DHAVE_FT -DHAVE_XPM GD.c cc1: warning: changing search order for system directory "/usr/local/include" cc1: warning: as it has already been specified as a non-system directory Running Mkbootstrap for GD () chmod 644 GD.bs rm -f blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib:/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib" gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib GD.o -o blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so -L/usr/lib/X11 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lgd -lpng -lz -lfreetype -ljpeg -lm -lX11 -lXpm /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpng collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so] Error 1 /usr/bin/make -- NOT OK Running make test Can't test without successful make Running make install make had returned bad status, install seems impossible --- totally stuck with the problem can anyone help to overcome with same problem, it would be great help or else suggest any free bug tracking tool which should be easy for installation. Thanks & Regards, santosh Ph: 5202424, 5273061 ext 102 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
How to install bugzilla
I have been trying to install Bugzilla on our server now for the past = day and have gotten no where. Does anyone know of any scripts to = install=20 bugzilla on RedHat 8.0. =20 If this has been ask before I am sorry for reposting Daniel Jaffa
Bugzilla interface questions
I'm currently working on a project that will require some web integration between a "user-friendly" web-interface and bugzilla. I was wondering if anyone could throw out a few websites that might have a similar configuration. Thanks, Chad Miller
how to set user preferences in bugzilla?
is there any way to set user-specific preferences in bugzilla beyond what i can see there -- that is, the account settings and email settings? specifically, it would speed things up if, after i log in, i could have bugzilla know that i really only care about red hat linux 8.0, both for querying and submitting new bugs. is this possible? rday -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Glut package changed, no documentation in 7.3 - bugzilla complaints
At least you got a response to your report. "My" bug, http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60930 still has no response after almost three months. But I suppose they have other priorities. Andreas - Original Message - From: "Patrick Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:27 PM Subject: Re: Glut package changed, no documentation in 7.3 > I agree with you. Every 'i' and 't' can't be expected, and I always > could file a bug report. But wait!! I already did. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65675 > Following that, I replied offline saying that it should have been > documented. I received an email informing me that I was, more or less, > curt. And that I had been added to his procmail filter, so don't bother > replying. And that he didn't mind checking my 'bugs' as NOTABUG, and > that he would be sure to look down on any future 'bugs' I might have. > I'd post the email, but it pissed me off so much that I deleted it. > > I have to admit, this is the first time I've felt of RedHat as a > corporate entity. > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: question about packages rawhide, bugzilla etc.
Thanks Ed, And in-case anyone else is listening, if you want to query the rpm file without installing it, the command will be rpm -qp file.rpm --changelog On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 12:07, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:01:59AM -0500, Jeff Bearer wrote: > > What is the best place to find information about rawhide packages > > bugzilla? > > > > The reason I'm asking is that I saw the Amanda package in rawhide. > > (2.42p2-5) and the latest production rpm from RH is 2.4.2p2-4. I want to > > know what has been changed in the last revision, but from bugzilla I > > can't find out. Is there someplace I can find a change log, or is there > > a WebCVS or something that has this information? > > Assuming that the package developer has done his/her job properly, you should > be able to download the package and then do an rpm -q --changelog. > This will extract the changelog from the package and display it to the screen - > you may want to pipe this to less. > > Not all packages have complete changelogs, and some don't have a changelog at > all, but this is usually a good start. > > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Jeff Bearer, RHCE Webmaster PittsburghLIVE.com 2002 EPpy Award, Best Online U.S. Newspaper ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: question about packages rawhide, bugzilla etc.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:01:59AM -0500, Jeff Bearer wrote: > What is the best place to find information about rawhide packages > bugzilla? > > The reason I'm asking is that I saw the Amanda package in rawhide. > (2.42p2-5) and the latest production rpm from RH is 2.4.2p2-4. I want to > know what has been changed in the last revision, but from bugzilla I > can't find out. Is there someplace I can find a change log, or is there > a WebCVS or something that has this information? Assuming that the package developer has done his/her job properly, you should be able to download the package and then do an rpm -q --changelog. This will extract the changelog from the package and display it to the screen - you may want to pipe this to less. Not all packages have complete changelogs, and some don't have a changelog at all, but this is usually a good start. -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
question about packages rawhide, bugzilla etc.
What is the best place to find information about rawhide packages bugzilla? The reason I'm asking is that I saw the Amanda package in rawhide. (2.42p2-5) and the latest production rpm from RH is 2.4.2p2-4. I want to know what has been changed in the last revision, but from bugzilla I can't find out. Is there someplace I can find a change log, or is there a WebCVS or something that has this information? -- Jeff Bearer, RHCE Webmaster PittsburghLIVE.com 2002 EPpy Award, Best Online U.S. Newspaper ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: >> By trying again later? >> I haven't had any problems with it for quite a while, but bugzilla IS >> undergoing the typical post-release overload (while at it, please check >> for dupes, many of the typical post-release reports are...), >> >Bero... I tried for several hours last night to use the JavaScript page. It is >totally un-useable. NOTHING works on that page. I submitted a bugzilla report >on THAT too. ;-) Fortunately you have the Non-JS pages which work just fine >Perhaps you guys ought to consider making the non-JS pages the default instead. I don't know what everyone else sees, but I've *never* got the Javascript pages *ever* without purposefully clicking on them. Just to add a datapoint for comparison. Are you sure you didn't choose the Javascript version on purpose at first? Perhaps it retains this in a cookie or something... Not sure. I doubt that the default is js though as it says right on the page prior to clicking on js version that it is slow. -- Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, Red Hat Inc.Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3 http://www.redhat.com Phone: (705)949-2136 ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, you wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > > > Bero... I tried for several hours last night to use the JavaScript > > page. It is totally un-useable. > > That explains why I can't reproduce the problem - the JavaScript page > doesn't like Konqueror, and "if it doesn't work in lynx or Konqueror, it's > broken, don't use it". > It also doesn't work in Mozilla. John ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: >Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:40:12 -0400 >From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain >List-Id: General Red Hat discussion list >Subject: Re: bugzilla is unuseable! > >On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, you wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: >> >> > Bero... I tried for several hours last night to use the JavaScript >> > page. It is totally un-useable. >> >> That explains why I can't reproduce the problem - the JavaScript page >> doesn't like Konqueror, and "if it doesn't work in lynx or Konqueror, it's >> broken, don't use it". >> >It also doesn't work in Mozilla. The regular bugzilla does, but mozilla is quite buggy so it doesn't work top notch. Mozilla 0.6 and early 0.7 versions work well though, but not with SSL. -- Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, Red Hat Inc.Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3 http://www.redhat.com Phone: (705)949-2136 ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > Bero... I tried for several hours last night to use the JavaScript > page. It is totally un-useable. That explains why I can't reproduce the problem - the JavaScript page doesn't like Konqueror, and "if it doesn't work in lynx or Konqueror, it's broken, don't use it". LLaP bero ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Followup: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, you wrote: > > > I have had problems with netscape under linux doing weird things on multiple > drop down javascript pages. Is that what you we using? Have you tried another > browser? > Not trying to piss you off more but offering some possible > explainations/solutions. > I've tried Mozilla and Konqueror. Neither of 'em works well. And I'll say this... under Mozilla (RH7.1 version) the formatting SUCKS! When using Konqueror, the formatting is MUCH better! No need to duck, btw. I got a response back from my Bugzilla report that the problem I was reporting (users can't write to the local CDDB) is an intended side effect of not wanting to open any security holes. Unfortunately, I think, in this case, RedHat is falling into the trap of trying to protect people against themselves! This is essentially crippling an application out of (IMNSHO) mis-placed security concerns. John ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, you wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > > > How, pray tell (RedHat guys???) are we supposed to "officially" report bugs > > if the web site is unuseable??? > > By trying again later? > I haven't had any problems with it for quite a while, but bugzilla IS > undergoing the typical post-release overload (while at it, please check > for dupes, many of the typical post-release reports are...), > Bero... I tried for several hours last night to use the JavaScript page. It is totally un-useable. NOTHING works on that page. I submitted a bugzilla report on THAT too. ;-) Fortunately you have the Non-JS pages which work just fine Perhaps you guys ought to consider making the non-JS pages the default instead. John ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, you wrote: > I don't know what everyone else sees, but I've *never* got the > Javascript pages *ever* without purposefully clicking on them. > > Just to add a datapoint for comparison. Are you sure you didn't > choose the Javascript version on purpose at first? Perhaps it > retains this in a cookie or something... Not sure. I doubt that > the default is js though as it says right on the page prior to > clicking on js version that it is slow. > Hmm...Ok... I just went back there IMNSHO, the "skip all this and go to the standard bug entry form (old version) shouldn't have to be there... it should DEFAULT to that and there should be a button that says "JavaScript version -- SLOW!" When I click on the "new bug" button, I get the "easy_enter_bug.cgi" page. That is the page that is loaded by default. The JavaScript page. John ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > How, pray tell (RedHat guys???) are we supposed to "officially" report bugs > if the web site is unuseable??? By trying again later? I haven't had any problems with it for quite a while, but bugzilla IS undergoing the typical post-release overload (while at it, please check for dupes, many of the typical post-release reports are...), LLaP bero ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Followup: bugzilla is unuseable!
John Aldrich wrote: > On Tuesday 24 April 2001 11:38 pm, you wrote: > > > > Ya know, I *was* going to let this go but the more I read this the more I > > got pissed off. Instead of complaing, bitching, moaning, being an > > abnocious brat, why don't you just list the problems you found on bugzilla > > and maybe *ask* if there was something going on with it. It would have > > been a lot nicer on the eyes and maybe someone might actually reply back > > with a reason or explanation of the situation. > > > You're right. I was frustrated and upset with fighting with the Bugzilla > page. I finally discovered the "non-javascript" page and was able to submit a > bugzilla report. But I think my point is still valid... the Bugzilla page is > broken. It loads the Javascript page by default and that page is SERIOUSLY > broken...it will hardly let you change ANYTHING. You've got a choice of > RedHat Linux or Powertools and that's about it! You can't select the package, > you can't select the VERSION of RedHat it's a REAL mess! I have had problems with netscape under linux doing weird things on multiple drop down javascript pages. Is that what you we using? Have you tried another browser? Not trying to piss you off more but offering some possible explainations/solutions. Bret ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla is unuseable!
John, No problems here. I report bugs and I follow bug reports entered by others. Couldn't say it's lightning fast but fully acceptable. Gustav John Aldrich wrote: > > I am unable to complete a bugzilla entry... the darn site is too freaking > slow! Heck I shouldn't have any problems trying to report bugs, because > RedHat should be providing a LOT of resources for that site so they can find > and squash bugs, right? Wrong! > > How, pray tell (RedHat guys???) are we supposed to "officially" report bugs > if the web site is unuseable Trond, et al? Are you listening? You need > to get on the phone and tell whoever's in charge of that site to wake up and > fix the site so you can actually use it to report a bug! > > FWIW, my ISP is on UUNET and I'm less than a dozen hops away from the last > hop (192.atm9-0-0.gw3.rdu1.alter.net) and there is NO traffic loss between > here and there. Knowing RedHat is in North Carolina, this really proves to me > that it's NOT a network issue. I have to wonder if this is a problem in that > the "bugzilla.redhat.com" machine is also being used for ftp serving or > something Maybe y'all need a separate machine for Bugzilla you really > need to do SOMETHING so people can report problems with the distro! -- pgp = Pretty Good Privacy. To get my public pgp key, send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit my web site at http://www.schaffter.com ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Followup: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 11:38 pm, you wrote: > > Ya know, I *was* going to let this go but the more I read this the more I > got pissed off. Instead of complaing, bitching, moaning, being an > abnocious brat, why don't you just list the problems you found on bugzilla > and maybe *ask* if there was something going on with it. It would have > been a lot nicer on the eyes and maybe someone might actually reply back > with a reason or explanation of the situation. > You're right. I was frustrated and upset with fighting with the Bugzilla page. I finally discovered the "non-javascript" page and was able to submit a bugzilla report. But I think my point is still valid... the Bugzilla page is broken. It loads the Javascript page by default and that page is SERIOUSLY broken...it will hardly let you change ANYTHING. You've got a choice of RedHat Linux or Powertools and that's about it! You can't select the package, you can't select the VERSION of RedHat it's a REAL mess! And, yes, I probably should have phrased it differently. But it's still a valid point. John ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Followup: bugzilla is unuseable!
- Original Message - From: "John Aldrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:42 PM Subject: Followup: bugzilla is unuseable! > On Tuesday 24 April 2001 10:07 pm, you wrote: > > I am unable to complete a bugzilla entry... the darn site is too freaking > > slow! Heck I shouldn't have any problems trying to report bugs, because > > RedHat should be providing a LOT of resources for that site so they can > > find and squash bugs, right? Wrong! > > > > How, pray tell (RedHat guys???) are we supposed to "officially" report bugs > > if the web site is unuseable Trond, et al? Are you listening? You need > > to get on the phone and tell whoever's in charge of that site to wake up > > and fix the site so you can actually use it to report a bug! > > > > FWIW, my ISP is on UUNET and I'm less than a dozen hops away from the last > > hop (192.atm9-0-0.gw3.rdu1.alter.net) and there is NO traffic loss between > > here and there. Knowing RedHat is in North Carolina, this really proves to > > me that it's NOT a network issue. I have to wonder if this is a problem in > > that the "bugzilla.redhat.com" machine is also being used for ftp serving > > or something Maybe y'all need a separate machine for Bugzilla you > > really need to do SOMETHING so people can report problems with the distro! > > > > > By the way...this is the Javascript page. Your web team REALLY needs to > redesign it so that the STANDARD page is the default page! The Javascript > version of Bugzilla is SERIOUSLY b0rken!!! Ya know, I *was* going to let this go but the more I read this the more I got pissed off. Instead of complaing, bitching, moaning, being an abnocious brat, why don't you just list the problems you found on bugzilla and maybe *ask* if there was something going on with it. It would have been a lot nicer on the eyes and maybe someone might actually reply back with a reason or explanation of the situation. You have no idea if there was a problem at the time that they already knew about or were working on something or fixing something so you had no right to shoot off at the mouth without at least waiting to see what the problem might be. I'm sure the RedHat personnel are already aware of the problems that you encountered and if not woudl had been more then glad to say thank you for reporting it instead of mouthing off like below. Sorry for the rant to the others on the list, but I just hate when people jump to conclusions and run off at the mouth instead of presenting a problem or resolution in a nice timely manner. Ok I'm tired and off to bed, again apologize to the others on the list. Mike ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Followup: bugzilla is unuseable!
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 10:07 pm, you wrote: > I am unable to complete a bugzilla entry... the darn site is too freaking > slow! Heck I shouldn't have any problems trying to report bugs, because > RedHat should be providing a LOT of resources for that site so they can > find and squash bugs, right? Wrong! > > How, pray tell (RedHat guys???) are we supposed to "officially" report bugs > if the web site is unuseable Trond, et al? Are you listening? You need > to get on the phone and tell whoever's in charge of that site to wake up > and fix the site so you can actually use it to report a bug! > > FWIW, my ISP is on UUNET and I'm less than a dozen hops away from the last > hop (192.atm9-0-0.gw3.rdu1.alter.net) and there is NO traffic loss between > here and there. Knowing RedHat is in North Carolina, this really proves to > me that it's NOT a network issue. I have to wonder if this is a problem in > that the "bugzilla.redhat.com" machine is also being used for ftp serving > or something Maybe y'all need a separate machine for Bugzilla you > really need to do SOMETHING so people can report problems with the distro! > > By the way...this is the Javascript page. Your web team REALLY needs to redesign it so that the STANDARD page is the default page! The Javascript version of Bugzilla is SERIOUSLY b0rken!!! ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugzilla is unuseable!
I am unable to complete a bugzilla entry... the darn site is too freaking slow! Heck I shouldn't have any problems trying to report bugs, because RedHat should be providing a LOT of resources for that site so they can find and squash bugs, right? Wrong! How, pray tell (RedHat guys???) are we supposed to "officially" report bugs if the web site is unuseable Trond, et al? Are you listening? You need to get on the phone and tell whoever's in charge of that site to wake up and fix the site so you can actually use it to report a bug! FWIW, my ISP is on UUNET and I'm less than a dozen hops away from the last hop (192.atm9-0-0.gw3.rdu1.alter.net) and there is NO traffic loss between here and there. Knowing RedHat is in North Carolina, this really proves to me that it's NOT a network issue. I have to wonder if this is a problem in that the "bugzilla.redhat.com" machine is also being used for ftp serving or something Maybe y'all need a separate machine for Bugzilla you really need to do SOMETHING so people can report problems with the distro! ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: xinetd and tcpwrappers [now in bugzilla]
It seems as if I'm not the only one having the problem after all. The bug has been reported to bugzilla by dboth at redhat as bug id=36640. Guess I'll just have to wait for a fix. Regards Gustav Dan Stromberg wrote: > > H Also the ipop3d of course. Neglected to mention that. > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:12:58PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > I'd try to fetchmail from another host while you sniff from ethereal, > > or strace the sendmail and/or fetchmail programs, to ascertain what is > > happening in the smtp dialog. > > > > Once you've done that, you have something to take to > > comp.mail.sendmail and/or the fetchmail author(s). > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:26:19PM +0200, Gustav Schaffter wrote: > > > Seems that no one has any tip as to where I could start to check what? > > > > > > Guess I'll have to take it to bugzilla, claiming it's a bug in the > > > installer. > > > > > > Gustav > > > > > > > > > Gustav Schaffter wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Just upgraded from RH6.2+ to RH7.1. Upgrade seems to have gone fine. Got > > > > one big problem, though. > > > > > > > > I run fetchmail from a crontab to get mail from ipop3d on another box in > > > > my home network. > > > > > > > > Since the upgrade, fetchmail fails to deliver the mail and it's lost in > > > > cyberspace. (Hence the urgency to get this working again.) > > > > > > > > This is an excerpt from my maillog: > > > > > > > > Apr 19 18:42:04 valhall fetchmail[11075]: reading message 1 of 1 (4959 > > > > octets) > > > > Apr 19 18:42:04 valhall sendmail[11081]: f3JGg4311081: tcpwrappers > > > > (localhost, 127.0.0.1) rejection > > > > Apr 19 18:42:04 valhall fetchmail[11075]: flushed > > > > Apr 19 18:42:04 valhall sendmail[11081]: NOQUEUE: localhost [127.0.0.1] > > > > did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA > > > > Apr 19 18:42:04 valhall sendmail[11082]: f3JGg4c11082: from=root, > > > > size=220, class=0, nrcpts=1, > > > > msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > > relay=root@localhost > > > > Apr 19 18:42:04 valhall sendmail[11082]: f3JGg4c11082: to=root, > > > > ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, > > > > pri=30220, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent > > > > > > > > In desperation I set my /etc/hosts.allow to: > > > > > > > > ALL:10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > > > ALL:127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255 > > > > portmap:10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > > > mountd: 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > > > nfs:10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > > > in.ftpd:10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > > > ipop3d: 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 > > > > > > > > but it doesn't help. -- pgp = Pretty Good Privacy. To get my public pgp key, send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit my web site at http://www.schaffter.com ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: bugzilla (actually perl-GD)
You might be better served by installing GD, then using CPAN to grab the Perl side of it. The RPMs are a bit out of date, I believe. --Alan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 5:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bugzilla (actually perl-GD) Perl and GD have both caused me alot of pain. I'd say forget it untill bugzilla gets updated, unless you /want/ a wild ride. I must say however that my trouble was moving from lower (default) to higher (newer then default) - maybe look on ftp.redhat.com and get older packages? You could aways install the srouce rpm for gd (rpm -i) edit the spec file to remove "requires perl" and recompile it with rpm -ba --target=your_machine_arch /path/to/spec.file and hope for the best At 05:20 PM 1/19/2001 -0600, you wrote: >Hi, all. Taking a stab at getting Bugzilla installed, and I appear to >have run into a bit of a catch-22. > >>From the Bugzilla README: >" >Note, however, that you MUST >use [perl-GD] version 1.18 or 1.19, because newer versions have dropped >support >for GIFs in favor of PNGs, and bugzilla has not yet been updated to >deal with this. >" > >Okay; so I trot merrily off to rpmfind.net and grab the perl-GD package, >version 1.19, but rpm -ivvh fails like so: > >[root@titan RPMS]# rpm -ivvh /tmp/perl-GD-1.19-2.i386.rpm > >D: NO A perl <= 5.6.0 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: the "B" dependency needs an epoch (assuming same as "A") >A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: NO A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: NO A perl <= 5.6.0 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: the "B" dependency needs an epoch (assuming same as "A") >A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: NO A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: Requires: perl >= 5.00503 NO >D: package perl-GD-1.19-2 require not satisfied: perl >= 5.00503 > >error: failed dependencies: >perl >= 5.00503 is needed by perl-GD-1.19-2 > > >Drat! I have Perl 5.6 installed, apparently it's too new to work with >perl-GD 1.19? > >Has anybody else run into this? Any tips on working around it? > >Thanks, >-m > > >-- >Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation >"Trouble ensues." > > > >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list Jonathan Wilson System Administrator Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com Central Texas IT http://www.centraltexasit.com ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla (actually perl-GD)
Perl and GD have both caused me alot of pain. I'd say forget it untill bugzilla gets updated, unless you /want/ a wild ride. I must say however that my trouble was moving from lower (default) to higher (newer then default) - maybe look on ftp.redhat.com and get older packages? You could aways install the srouce rpm for gd (rpm -i) edit the spec file to remove "requires perl" and recompile it with rpm -ba --target=your_machine_arch /path/to/spec.file and hope for the best At 05:20 PM 1/19/2001 -0600, you wrote: >Hi, all. Taking a stab at getting Bugzilla installed, and I appear to >have run into a bit of a catch-22. > >>From the Bugzilla README: >" >Note, however, that you MUST >use [perl-GD] version 1.18 or 1.19, because newer versions have dropped >support >for GIFs in favor of PNGs, and bugzilla has not yet been updated to >deal with this. >" > >Okay; so I trot merrily off to rpmfind.net and grab the perl-GD package, >version 1.19, but rpm -ivvh fails like so: > >[root@titan RPMS]# rpm -ivvh /tmp/perl-GD-1.19-2.i386.rpm > >D: NO A perl <= 5.6.0 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: the "B" dependency needs an epoch (assuming same as "A") >A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: NO A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: NO A perl <= 5.6.0 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: the "B" dependency needs an epoch (assuming same as "A") >A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: NO A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 >D: Requires: perl >= 5.00503 NO >D: package perl-GD-1.19-2 require not satisfied: perl >= 5.00503 > >error: failed dependencies: >perl >= 5.00503 is needed by perl-GD-1.19-2 > > >Drat! I have Perl 5.6 installed, apparently it's too new to work with >perl-GD 1.19? > >Has anybody else run into this? Any tips on working around it? > >Thanks, >-m > > >-- >Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation >"Trouble ensues." > > > >___ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list Jonathan Wilson System Administrator Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com Central Texas IT http://www.centraltexasit.com ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugzilla (actually perl-GD)
Hi, all. Taking a stab at getting Bugzilla installed, and I appear to have run into a bit of a catch-22. >From the Bugzilla README: " Note, however, that you MUST use [perl-GD] version 1.18 or 1.19, because newer versions have dropped support for GIFs in favor of PNGs, and bugzilla has not yet been updated to deal with this. " Okay; so I trot merrily off to rpmfind.net and grab the perl-GD package, version 1.19, but rpm -ivvh fails like so: [root@titan RPMS]# rpm -ivvh /tmp/perl-GD-1.19-2.i386.rpm D: NO A perl <= 5.6.0 B perl >= 5.00503 D: the "B" dependency needs an epoch (assuming same as "A") A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 D: NO A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 D: NO A perl <= 5.6.0 B perl >= 5.00503 D: the "B" dependency needs an epoch (assuming same as "A") A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 D: NO A perl = 1:5.6.0-9 B perl >= 5.00503 D: Requires: perl >= 5.00503 NO D: package perl-GD-1.19-2 require not satisfied: perl >= 5.00503 error: failed dependencies: perl >= 5.00503 is needed by perl-GD-1.19-2 Drat! I have Perl 5.6 installed, apparently it's too new to work with perl-GD 1.19? Has anybody else run into this? Any tips on working around it? Thanks, -m -- Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation "Trouble ensues." ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla from RPM's?
I've created a bugzilla RPM which I use at work. It's 2.10 and I've modified the spec file to depend on 'MySQL' rather than 'mysql'. The perl dependencies still have to be met, but that's no big deal. At any rate, let me know if you'd like to check them out and I'll make them available. Cheers -Charlie On Wed 29 Nov at 17:48:14 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] done said: > Is anybody using one of the RPM'ified bugzilla packages successfully? > I've tried to install a couple of them, found on rpmfind.net, but they > all seem to have weird Perl dependencies that can't be satisfied using > RPM packages, or to depend on "MySQL" and fail when my RPM database > reports that "mysql" is installed. > > A pointer to a version of the bugzilla RPM that will work with Red Hat 7 > or 6.2 would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > -m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your files have been destroyed (sorry). Paul. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: bugzilla from RPM's?
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:45:37AM -0500, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > They've all worked fine on my 6.2 box. Note that one of them is a perl > update, and another is an rpm update... > > As an aside, does the new rpm work on older packages (I assume it does, but > have not tried it) Seems to depend on the package - I ran across one RHL 5.2 errata RPM (glint, IIRC), which was specifically asking for rpm < 2.something and refused to be installed by my rpm 3.0.5 (which in itself is part of the updates...). Haven't tried the SRPM yet. Cheerio, Thomas -- "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!" Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919 "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: bugzilla from RPM's?
They've all worked fine on my 6.2 box. Note that one of them is a perl update, and another is an rpm update... As an aside, does the new rpm work on older packages (I assume it does, but have not tried it) > -Original Message- > From: Michael R. Jinks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 6:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: bugzilla from RPM's? > > Is anybody using one of the RPM'ified bugzilla packages successfully? > I've tried to install a couple of them, found on rpmfind.net, but they > all seem to have weird Perl dependencies that can't be satisfied using > RPM packages, or to depend on "MySQL" and fail when my RPM database > reports that "mysql" is installed. > > A pointer to a version of the bugzilla RPM that will work with Red Hat 7 > or 6.2 would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > -m > -- > Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation > "No one speaks English and everything's broken." -- T. Waits > "Tom Waits would have made a decent sysadmin." -- M. Jinks > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugzilla from RPM's?
Is anybody using one of the RPM'ified bugzilla packages successfully? I've tried to install a couple of them, found on rpmfind.net, but they all seem to have weird Perl dependencies that can't be satisfied using RPM packages, or to depend on "MySQL" and fail when my RPM database reports that "mysql" is installed. A pointer to a version of the bugzilla RPM that will work with Red Hat 7 or 6.2 would be much appreciated. Thanks, -m -- Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation "No one speaks English and everything's broken." -- T. Waits "Tom Waits would have made a decent sysadmin." -- M. Jinks ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Regards Gustav "Michael S. Dunsavage" wrote: > > what is the website to subscrive to bugzilla? -- pgp = Pretty Good Privacy. To get my public pgp key, send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit my web site at http://www.schaffter.com ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Bugzilla
what is the website to subscrive to bugzilla? - Original Message - From: "Luke C Gavel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:37 PM Subject: Re: Bugzilla > > hehe, I don't know about reruns, but it looks like they just > signed on some more 'white hats'. I'm seeing one heck of a lot > of security patches Did RH get another pocketbook boost > lately? Mergers? > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > > > Holy Cow! > > > > What the heck is up with bugzilla!? I've gotten at least 30 bug > > reports today, and every one of them is a rerun... > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > -- Generated Signature -- > A diplomat's life consists of three > things: protocol, Geritol, and alcohol. > -- Adlai Stevenson > -- End Sig -- > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Bugzilla
agreed. I think it might be time to write a script (called by procmail) that parses these messages and checks your local updates directory and fetches them if need be (for some configurable set of architectures) charles On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > Lemme telya... It's a pain in the ass going through all those damned things > just to ensure there's not a new one *ugh!* ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Bugzilla
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > hehe, I don't know about reruns, but it looks like they just > signed on some more 'white hats'. I'm seeing one heck of a lot > of security patches Did RH get another pocketbook boost > lately? Mergers? Most of the advisories are re-released advisories to include links to the alpha updates. thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Bugzilla
Lemme telya... It's a pain in the ass going through all those damned things just to ensure there's not a new one *ugh!* > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:38 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: Bugzilla > > > hehe, I don't know about reruns, but it looks like they just > signed on some more 'white hats'. I'm seeing one heck of a lot > of security patches Did RH get another pocketbook boost > lately? Mergers? > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > > > Holy Cow! > > > > What the heck is up with bugzilla!? I've gotten at least 30 bug > > reports today, and every one of them is a rerun... > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > -- Generated Signature -- > A diplomat's life consists of three > things: protocol, Geritol, and alcohol. > -- Adlai Stevenson > -- End Sig -- > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Bugzilla
hehe, I don't know about reruns, but it looks like they just signed on some more 'white hats'. I'm seeing one heck of a lot of security patches Did RH get another pocketbook boost lately? Mergers? On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: > Holy Cow! > > What the heck is up with bugzilla!? I've gotten at least 30 bug > reports today, and every one of them is a rerun... > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- Generated Signature -- A diplomat's life consists of three things: protocol, Geritol, and alcohol. -- Adlai Stevenson -- End Sig -- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Bugzilla
Holy Cow! What the heck is up with bugzilla!? I've gotten at least 30 bug reports today, and every one of them is a rerun... ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Updated mailx dumps core [Keyword: Bugzilla]
Owen, > I have updated mailx per RHSA-2000:048-06 to mailx-8.1.1-16.i386.rpm. [snip] > I see someone has reported this in the linux.redhat.misc news group, > without reply. On the prinstripe (RH7.0beta) list (crossposted), the discussion about Bugzilla is raging... I reported the mailx problem yesterday: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16304 and had a response within MINUTES. I'm not sure when the updated rpm will be on the ftp servers, for now you can get the SRC.RPM at http://stoker.stanford.edu/~blomgren/Linux/mailx-8.1.1-17.src.rpm (If traffic gets out of control, I'll have to take it down...) -- \Peter. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Anyone have bugzilla installed successfully from RPM?
Hi all. I recently tried to install bugzilla from the bugzilla-2.8.1.src.rpm. It told me it required Chart, TimeDate, Mysql, msql-mysql, and DBI. I grabbed those rpms (all these are distributed by redhat) and installed them. However, bugzilla still complains about failed dependencies saying that it needs TimeDate, Chart, and Msql-Mysql. When I query the rpm database, there is no TimeDate, but there is perl-TimeDate (which is what the rpm was called when I installed it). Same for the other two. Is it possible that the bugzilla rpm is "broken" in that the names of the rpms it wants to see installed are actually prefixed with "perl-" and so therefore, it does not recognize them? Is there a quick way I can fix this? Can anyone who might have bugzilla installed on intel/RH6.2 from rpm (or otherwise) provide some advice on how to proceed? Thanks. : ) -Ra -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Always ppp0 -- response from Bugzilla
Got a definitive answer from the maintainer of ppp as to why ifconfig always shows ppp0 no matter which ppp device is up. Now this motivates me even more to write a ppp maintainer that will report which device is actually up, as well as give you your connection speed, DHCP IP address, switching ppp devices, etc. Thank you everyone for you attention to this matter. Clarence Donath [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/04/00 11:44 --- +This is normal behavior. Interface names (as output by ifconfig) are always +numbered sequentially starting at zero. Your interface comes up as ppp0 because +it is the first ppp interface that is up on the system. The device name set in +the related ifcfg-pppX file is only used to determine which copy of ppp-watch to +kill in order to bring the interface down. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
