Re: pppd "not replacing existing default route to eth0"

2002-08-11 Thread Kevin - KD Micro Software

ah, same thinking :)
didn't see your message before I replied then.

Thanks.

- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: pppd "not replacing existing default route to eth0"


> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:46:09 +0800, Kevin wrote:
>
> >When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but traffic doesn't go
anywhere and in /var/log/messages, I'm getting "not replacing existing
default route to eth0". I can see why outgoing traffic isn't going anywhere
cause its trying to go out via eth0, but why is this?
> >
> >I *think* this has something to do with static-routes in /etc/sysconfig
but I'm not sure.
>
> Why do you think that?
>
> The log file says that the problem is a routing one. There is no route to
> the internet, as ppp has not replaced the default gateway that was already
> in place.
>
> What you need to find out is where the current default route is coming
from,
> and why it's there. (169.254 is a windows auto config IP???)
>
> This would be easy to test, before you bring ppp up delete the default
route
> with:
>
> route del default
>
> and see what happens.
>
> You can check the routing table with:
>
> route
>
> and restore the old default gateway with
>
> route add default gw  169.254.236.254
>
> (Though unless you know what this is for, it's not useful)
>
> HTH.
>
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: pppd "not replacing existing default route to eth0" [solved]

2002-08-11 Thread Kevin - KD Micro Software




Thanks for the quick response 
Ed.
I knew it had something to do with the routing, and I had had trouble with 
the static-routes file before but it didn't appear to be it this time.I 
dunno why I didn't think of this before, but a simple route del 
default and then route add default ppp0 sorted it out 
perfectly.
Thanks anyway.
Kevin 
GreenKD Micro Software :: "Servicing all ends of the evolutionary 
scale" - Frank Holmes[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MP 107, Market City, 280 Bannister Road, Canning Vale WA 
6155.Phone: 9256 1566 (2778 internal)     Mobile: 
0419 949 254.
 
- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: pppd "not replacing existing default 
route to eth0"
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote:> 
> > When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but traffic 
doesn't go> > anywhere and in /var/log/messages, I'm getting "not 
replacing existing> > default route to eth0". I can see why outgoing 
traffic isn't going> > anywhere cause its trying to go out via eth0, 
but why is this?> > > > I *think* this has something to do 
with static-routes in /etc/sysconfig> > but I'm not sure.> 
> Do the static routes include a static default route?  If so, then 
you are> probably correct in your guess.> > At this point 
the obvious answer is to "experiment".  Making sure you keep> a copy 
of your configuration files, delete the static routes you guess may> be 
causing the problem.  If that clears things up with regards to 
Internet> connectivity...then you may be all the way thereor part of 
the way > there.  Depending on your network topology you may have to 
add additional > static routes to compensate for the new default 
route.> > Regards,> Ed> > -- > 
http://www.shorewall.net/  for 
all your firewall needs> http://www.greshko.com http://webcams.greshko.com> 
> > > -- > redhat-list mailing list> 
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: pppd "not replacing existing default route to eth0"

2002-08-11 Thread Kevin Myers

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:46:09 +0800, Kevin wrote:

>When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but traffic doesn't go anywhere and 
>in /var/log/messages, I'm getting "not replacing existing default route to eth0". I 
>can see why outgoing traffic isn't going anywhere cause its trying to go out via 
>eth0, but why is this?
>
>I *think* this has something to do with static-routes in /etc/sysconfig but I'm not 
>sure.

Why do you think that?

The log file says that the problem is a routing one. There is no route to
the internet, as ppp has not replaced the default gateway that was already
in place.

What you need to find out is where the current default route is coming from,
and why it's there. (169.254 is a windows auto config IP???)

This would be easy to test, before you bring ppp up delete the default route
with:

route del default 

and see what happens.

You can check the routing table with:

route

and restore the old default gateway with

route add default gw  169.254.236.254

(Though unless you know what this is for, it's not useful)

HTH.



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: pppd "not replacing existing default route to eth0"

2002-08-11 Thread Ed . Greshko

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote:

> When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but traffic doesn't go
> anywhere and in /var/log/messages, I'm getting "not replacing existing
> default route to eth0". I can see why outgoing traffic isn't going
> anywhere cause its trying to go out via eth0, but why is this?
> 
> I *think* this has something to do with static-routes in /etc/sysconfig
> but I'm not sure.

Do the static routes include a static default route?  If so, then you are
probably correct in your guess.

At this point the obvious answer is to "experiment".  Making sure you keep
a copy of your configuration files, delete the static routes you guess may
be causing the problem.  If that clears things up with regards to Internet
connectivity...then you may be all the way thereor part of the way 
there.  Depending on your network topology you may have to add additional 
static routes to compensate for the new default route.

Regards,
Ed

-- 
http://www.shorewall.net/  for all your firewall needs
http://www.greshko.com http://webcams.greshko.com



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



pppd "not replacing existing default route to eth0"

2002-08-11 Thread Kevin - KD Micro Software



Hi all,
 
When I run pppd, it's connecting to the ISP ok, but 
traffic doesn't go anywhere and in 
/var/log/messages, I'm getting "not replacing existing default route to eth0". I 
can see why outgoing traffic isn't going anywhere cause its trying to go out via 
eth0, but why is this?
 
I *think* this has something to do with 
static-routes in /etc/sysconfig but I'm not sure.
 
/var/log/messages
Aug 12 08:39:02 mail pppd[17779]: pppd 2.4.1 
started by root, uid 0Aug 12 08:39:34 mail pppd[17779]: Serial connection 
established.Aug 12 08:39:34 mail pppd[17779]: Using interface ppp0Aug 12 
08:39:34 mail pppd[17779]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0Aug 12 
08:39:42 mail pppd[17779]: not replacing existing default route to eth0 
[169.254.236.254]Aug 12 08:39:42 mail pppd[17779]: local  IP address 
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXXAug 12 08:39:42 mail pppd[17779]: remote IP address 
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
TIA

Kevin 
GreenKD Micro Software :: "Servicing all ends of the evolutionary 
scale" - Frank Holmes[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MP 107, Market City, 280 Bannister Road, Canning Vale WA 
6155.Phone: 9256 1566 (2778 internal)     Mobile: 
0419 949 254.