[Repeater-Builder] Re: FCC Enforcment

2004-06-11 Thread Andrew Pepper
The program was probably The Screen Savers on G4-Tech TV. It's definatly
G4Tech TV though. Their website is here http://www.g4techtv.com/home.aspx
Maybe they can tell you when it'll be repeated again. The presenter was Leo
Laporte.

Andrew
KC2EUS / GM1YMI

- Original Message - 
From: Paul Guello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 17:08
Subject: [roadrunner] Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment


 I'd like to get the rest of this video.  Any idea
 where one would look?  It says 'MetroVision 7 abc',
 but no indication of where they are.
 Paul, kb9wlc

 --- Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Here is a link for an interesting article about
  interference of radio
  signal and how they are  tracked down ,  I always
  thought you had to
  Triangulate a Signal ,   Ride along with the FCC  I
  did Virus Check  files
  are ok.
 
  Enjoy  Don KA9QJG
 
 
 
  One file is very large and the other is small
http://www.sandman.com/files/FCC-Interference.mpg
 
  http://www.sandman.com/files/FCC-Interference.wmv
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 





 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://messenger.yahoo.com/





 Yahoo! Groups Links








---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.701 / Virus Database: 458 - Release Date: 6/7/2004





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread w9mwq
Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all 
the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the 
transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp 
to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a 
half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might 
run into.

Mathew






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Ken Arck
At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all 
the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the 
transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp 
to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a 
half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might 
run into.

---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my head.
Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack thereof),
duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)

IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread Don
At 02:05 PM 6/10/04 -0700, you wrote:

   I used to attend the classes too.  But that was way back when ...

   Neil - WA6KLA
  Neil , That was when We use to Fix Dynamotors and Vibrators. Cops use to 
not worry about the bad Guys stealing Squads,  They had to keep the running 
So the Radio Equipment would not run the battery down. The first Dynamotor 
I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola twin v , 
on 6 Meter AM .

Ha Ha Don KA9QJG 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife

 At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
 Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
 the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
 transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
 to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
 half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
 run into.

 ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my head.
 Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack thereof),
 duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)

 IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...

 Ken

I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as for duty
cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about an hour,
I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say for the
puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.

Thanks.

Mathew



 --

 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net





 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Joe Montierth

--- w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Need some input on this, what others think.  I am
 trying to pull all 
 the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left
 is the 
 transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an
 exciter for the amp 
 to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I
 only need a 
 half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can
 think I might 
 run into.
 
 Mathew
 

You might be better off getting a commercial type
exciter. The Micor mobile or base exciter puts out
around .4 to .5 watts and might be a good choice to
look at. They are widely available, and lots of
literature about them. They also are continuous duty
rated, and you can probably pick one up for under $20
(you can get the whole radio for that much).

Joe




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic

2004-06-11 Thread mch
That's what the Pittsburgh station sends... 8 seconds.

Joe M.

Jim B. wrote:
 
 The spec is 8 seconds.
 --
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL
 
 Q wrote:
 
  Our local system sends 3 seconds,must be valid for one full second...you
  want some delay to prevent falsing.
  - Original Message -
  From: Kevin Bednar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 6:56 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic
 
 
 
 Thanks much. Whats the min length for the tone to activate?
 
 Kev
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 6:53 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic
 
 1050hz.
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Bednar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 6:51 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic
 
 
 
 Anyone know what tones need to be generated on a service monitor to
 test
 
 the
 
 alert function on a weather alert receiver? I'm looking to interface
 one
 
 to
 
 my repeater but want to test it and set the levels before I drag it up
 to the site. TIA to all.
 
 Kevin
 K2KMB
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question

2004-06-11 Thread Kevin Custer
Jed,

Start by using as much cable as necessary to make the connection, then, 
and only if you have problems should you worry about cabling lengths 
between the duplexer and radio set.  Use quality cable like RG-214 Mil Spec.

BTW:  If the length is dependent, there is no simple magical length 
formula, like 1/4 wave or odd multiples there of.  Proper matching 
depends on the impedance presented by the radio set, duplexer, and to 
some degree, antenna.  If the length is critical, you won't see the 
right output power at the antenna port of the duplexer.  If your 
duplexer is a Wacom WP-652 four cavity model, the stated loss of the 
pass frequency is 1.2 dB, which translates to approximately 24% of your 
applied power will reach the antenna port.  So,  if you applied 50 watts 
to the transmitter port of the duplexer, and the duplexer lost the 
stated amount of 1.2 dB (24%), the power coming out of the duplexer 
should be about 38 watts.

Wacom has a write up on optimizing duplexer interconnecting cable lengths:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/pdf/wp6xxVHFtuninginstructions.pdf
Page 4 of the document under the obvious heading.

Jed Barton wrote:

Hey guys.
OK, I'm sure this has been discussed, but I figured I'd ask.
I've got a wacom 220 duplexer and I think the cables between the
transmit side of the cans and the transmitter, and the same with the
receiver need to be replaced.
Any ideas as far as length is concerned?
I know there have been a lot of people saying that length matters, 
Any thoughts?
The output frequency is 223.980.
Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Jed





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 


  







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] MGF1502 or or 1402 or 1302 GasFets's

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
I am told that the noise ratio is greater with the 1902 as it was with the
1302, is this true.  Told about .5 db to 1.3 db.  Any thoughts.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] MGF1502 or or 1402 or 1302 GasFets's


 I have used the mgf1902 to replace 1302.  The 1902 is available from
 Down East Microwave.  Very nice people to deal with.  You will find the
 1902 listed about 3/4 way down on this page:

 http://www.downeastmicrowave.com/cat-frame.htm

 GL,
 Dex

 w9mwq wrote:

  Anyone have a good source available for any of these transistors.
  Need to replace a few in some amps.  Thanks.
 
  Mathew
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question

2004-06-11 Thread Kevin Custer
Mathew Quaife wrote:

Good question then Russ, what makes the 214/U a better cable than the
LMR400, I can understand the 9913, hollow center, but LMR400 is shielded
quite well.  Just for my own knowledge here.


Cables that are made of tin braid over aluminum foil can suffer from 
dissimilar metal noise problems.  Those types of cables should be 
avoided at a duplex site.
Only quality silver plated double shielded cables should be used in 
duplex service. 

Kevin Custer








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work forever.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts 
Ideas



  At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
  Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
  the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
  transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
  to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
  half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
  run into.
 
  ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my head.
  Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack thereof),
  duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)
 
  IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...
 
  Ken

 I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as for
duty
 cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about an
hour,
 I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say for
the
 puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.

 Thanks.

 Mathew




 --
 
  President and CTO - Arcom Communications
  Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
  http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
  AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
  http://www.irlp.net
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] MSR2000

2004-06-11 Thread jim
 hi need this part for MSR 2000.
   Motorola part number TRN5069A, audio 
and squelch module.
are these still avable or does any have one to sell..

thanks 
jim
kd8yx 
lapeer co mi.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
Ok, that makes sense.  For some reason I was thinking LMR400 was silver, but
looked it up, and nope.  Well I learned something today.  Thanks.  Now I
have to get some new cable.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question


 Mathew Quaife wrote:

 Good question then Russ, what makes the 214/U a better cable than the
 LMR400, I can understand the 9913, hollow center, but LMR400 is shielded
 quite well.  Just for my own knowledge here.
 

 Cables that are made of tin braid over aluminum foil can suffer from
 dissimilar metal noise problems.  Those types of cables should be
 avoided at a duplex site.
 Only quality silver plated double shielded cables should be used in
 duplex service.

 Kevin Custer









 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that is what I
am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this thing to be rock solid
so that I don't have to do much with it except pay the electric bill.  So if
someone has an exciter that would work for cheap, let me know.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts 
Ideas


 Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work forever.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV



 - Original Message -
 From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts 
 Ideas


 
   At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
   Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
   the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
   transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
   to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
   half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
   run into.
  
   ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my head.
   Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
thereof),
   duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)
  
   IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...
  
   Ken
 
  I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as for
 duty
  cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about an
 hour,
  I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say for
 the
  puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.
 
  Thanks.
 
  Mathew
 
 
 
 

 --
  
   President and CTO - Arcom Communications
   Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
   http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
   AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
   http://www.irlp.net
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 







 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question

2004-06-11 Thread russ
Easy answer,
It is made from the same medal i.e.: copper braid (double braid) with silver
coating on both. NO tin foil to rub on the brad and make it get crackle. I
use to use 9913 till I saw the light. Of Crosse the RG-214/u lists for about
$5.50 per foot. Wholesale is much cheaper.
Better jumpers. Try it you'll like it!
73 Russ, W3CH


- Original Message - 
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question


 Good question then Russ, what makes the 214/U a better cable than the
 LMR400, I can understand the 9913, hollow center, but LMR400 is shielded
 quite well.  Just for my own knowledge here.

 Mathew

 - Original Message -
 From: russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:40 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question


  Also use a GOOD coax like RG-214/U don't use any of the LMR 400's or
9913
  type coax.
  Also use good conectors as well.
  (silver silver teflon)
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Perryman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question
 
 
   Jed,
   If memory serves correct, I think inter-connecting cable length would
be
   1/4 wavelength at your frequency...  connector tip to connector tip.
If
   incorrect, someone please speak up  ;-)
  
   Mike
  
   At 12:58 PM 06/10/2004 -0700, you wrote:
   Hi Jed, I once read that the shortest lenght possible, but I think
they
  were
   talking from the duplexer to the radio.  But if you have the old
ones,
   measure them and make them the same length.  What makes you think
they
  need
   replaced?  Unless fraid, would have to say they should be ok, well
  tarnished
   could be a factor as well.
   
   Mathew
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Jed Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:49 AM
   Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question
   
   
 Hey guys.
 OK, I'm sure this has been discussed, but I figured I'd ask.
 I've got a wacom 220 duplexer and I think the cables between the
 transmit side of the cans and the transmitter, and the same with
the
 receiver need to be replaced.
 Any ideas as far as length is concerned?
 I know there have been a lot of people saying that length matters,
 Any thoughts?
 The output frequency is 223.980.
 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 Jed






 Yahoo! Groups Links





   
   
   
   
   
   
   Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
  
   -
  Mike PerrymanCavell, Mertz  Davis, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Consulting Engineers
  http://www.cmdconsulting.com 7839 Ashton Avenue
  K5JMPManassas, VA 20109   USA
  (703) 392-9090; (703) 392-9559 fax;  DC Line (202) 332-0110
   -
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] stuck repeater: ?resolved?

2004-06-11 Thread James
Put some fans on that thing and you won't have to sweat so much yourself 
over it :)

James

rtoplus wrote:

Well I visited the site and powered down everything...let it all 
rest for about 5 minutes.  After powering back up, everything seems 
fine.  The heat sink was hot as a firecracker, naturally (got up to 
90 degrees here today as well and the repeaters are in a tupperware 
tool/garden house).  

The fellow that owns the building said that in the past couple of 
weeks, his security system has been acting up as well.  I do have 
all of my equipment (2 meter msr2000 and GMRS micor) as well as the 
external controllers on surge protection.  My only guess is like 
someone said earlier, that the microprocessor got confused and 
burped.  Its been about 5 hours or so and so far so good.  

I did try to do the DTMF keydown for about 30 secs before visiting 
the site for a warm reset...no avail.  

Also, there was a comment about passing audio.  Before visiting the 
site I couldn't tell if audio was passing from the receiver to the 
transmitter or not.  The courtesy tone did transmit tho when I keyed 
the repeater with my HT.  The repeater is passing audio now cause 
there has been some activity on the repeater (this is a very little 
used machine).


Thanks to all for your suggestions...I hope the repeater/controller 
is fixed!

PS.  The PA survived


Bob, GMRS WPVV845, Amateur KG4WAD, LMRS WPXC892






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 


  






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] RG-214/U

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
Thanks Russ, well I will have to change them then.  Thanks for the help on
that.  Clears it up.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:20 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RG-214/U


 Hello All,

 Just a point about RG-214/U ver. RG-214 if you go shopping you will fine
you
 can get the MIL SPEC RG-214 with out the U but guess what? It is NOT the
 same coax. For jumpers on your repeater alway use the RG-214/U cost more
but
 is what you want.
 73 Russ, W3CH



 .






 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mike WA6ILQ
At 12:08 AM 6/11/04 +, you wrote:

Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
run into.

It's designed for a short duty cycle so it will get hot in minutes.
It's not frequency stable when it gets hot.
It will get dirty (spectrally) when it gets hot.

Do yourself a BIG favor and find a 25w UHF Micor mobile.  It's
rated for continuous duty and is EASY to convert.
Likewise a low power Mastr-II.

Or take a RCA 700 series UHF mobile radio.  Pull out the T-power
supply subchassis and the tube PA deck subchassis. Plug the
antenna relay connector into the exciter board  What you have left
is a 10w continuous duty radio.  The 700 series base station is just
as simple.

Mike WA6ILQ 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  As he said before, Micor or Mastr II exciter. 

  Send in the Motorola Channel Element or GE Integrated Circuit 
 Oscillator Module (ICOM) and a few bucks and get it done correctly 
 the first time.  

  If you don't do it correctly the first time, you will eventually 
 and suffer until you do. 

  Been there - done that !!! 

  73, 

  Neil - WA6KLA 

Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
 It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that 
 is what I am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this 
 thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much with it 
 except pay the electric bill.  So if someone has an exciter that 
 would work for cheap, let me know.
 
 Mathew
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts 
 Ideas
 
  Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work forever.
 
  Chuck
  WB2EDV
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts 
  Ideas
 
 
  
At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
run into.
   
---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my head.
Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
 thereof),
duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)
   
IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...
   
Ken
  
   I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as for
  duty
   cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about an
  hour,
   I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say for
  the
   puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.
  
   Thanks.
  
   Mathew
  
  
  
  
 
  --
   
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Jamey Wright
$79.95 for a 2C (2PPM) ICOM.  I have 2 at ICM now getting recrystalled.

Jamey
KD4SIY

-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
Ideas


They say ICM is the best of this, is this true?  Is that price about right
$100.00 per element.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
Ideas



   As he said before, Micor or Mastr II exciter.

   Send in the Motorola Channel Element or GE Integrated Circuit
  Oscillator Module (ICOM) and a few bucks and get it done correctly
  the first time.

   If you don't do it correctly the first time, you will eventually
  and suffer until you do.

   Been there - done that !!!

   73,

   Neil - WA6KLA

 Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
  It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that
  is what I am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this
  thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much with it
  except pay the electric bill.  So if someone has an exciter that
  would work for cheap, let me know.
 
  Mathew
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts

  Ideas
 
   Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work forever.
  
   Chuck
   WB2EDV
  
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
Thoughts 
   Ideas
  
  
   
 At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
 Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull
all
 the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
 transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the
amp
 to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
 half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I
might
 run into.

 ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my
head.
 Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
  thereof),
 duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)

 IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...

 Ken
   
I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as
for
   duty
cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about
an
   hour,
I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say
for
   the
puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.
   
Thanks.
   
Mathew
   
   
   
   
  
 
 --

 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net





 Yahoo! Groups Links





   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links











Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3

2004-06-11 Thread Paul Finch
NS Electronics is the closest you will probably find since they are what's
left of Cushman, sort of.  Ron Kelly was with the company when it was still
KNS Electronics.  When Ron left I guess they dropped the K out of the
name.  Ron was one of the design engineers at Cushman and was responsible
for the 7120 line of monitors.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 11:13 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3



  The Cushman factory had an optional kit that became available
 later in the CE3 production ... but I don't know where to get
 the info on it.

  Neil

Laryn Lohman wrote:

 Can this unit be modified to go below 450Mc?  Also are there any
 docs posted on the Web somewhere?  Thanks

 Laryn K8TVZ








Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
They say ICM is the best of this, is this true?  Is that price about right
$100.00 per element.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
Ideas



   As he said before, Micor or Mastr II exciter.

   Send in the Motorola Channel Element or GE Integrated Circuit
  Oscillator Module (ICOM) and a few bucks and get it done correctly
  the first time.

   If you don't do it correctly the first time, you will eventually
  and suffer until you do.

   Been there - done that !!!

   73,

   Neil - WA6KLA

 Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
  It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that
  is what I am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this
  thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much with it
  except pay the electric bill.  So if someone has an exciter that
  would work for cheap, let me know.
 
  Mathew
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts

  Ideas
 
   Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work forever.
  
   Chuck
   WB2EDV
  
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
Thoughts 
   Ideas
  
  
   
 At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
 Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull
all
 the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
 transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the
amp
 to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
 half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I
might
 run into.

 ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my
head.
 Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
  thereof),
 duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)

 IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...

 Ken
   
I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as
for
   duty
cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about
an
   hour,
I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say
for
   the
puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.
   
Thanks.
   
Mathew
   
   
   
   
  
 
 --

 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net





 Yahoo! Groups Links





   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
That's not quite so bad.  Well I will just have to see what comes out of it.
All I need is something that puts out about 400 milliwatts to drive the amp.
I was just hoping to get rid of the regency stuff.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Jamey Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
Ideas


 $79.95 for a 2C (2PPM) ICOM.  I have 2 at ICM now getting recrystalled.

 Jamey
 KD4SIY

 -Original Message-
 From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:02 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
 Ideas


 They say ICM is the best of this, is this true?  Is that price about right
 $100.00 per element.

 Mathew

 - Original Message -
 From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
 Ideas


 
As he said before, Micor or Mastr II exciter.
 
Send in the Motorola Channel Element or GE Integrated Circuit
   Oscillator Module (ICOM) and a few bucks and get it done correctly
   the first time.
 
If you don't do it correctly the first time, you will eventually
   and suffer until you do.
 
Been there - done that !!!
 
73,
 
Neil - WA6KLA
 
  Mathew Quaife wrote:
  
   It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that
   is what I am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this
   thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much with it
   except pay the electric bill.  So if someone has an exciter that
   would work for cheap, let me know.
  
   Mathew
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
Thoughts
 
   Ideas
  
Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work
forever.
   
Chuck
WB2EDV
   
   
   
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
 Thoughts 
Ideas
   
   

  At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
  Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to
pull
 all
  the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
  transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for
the
 amp
  to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need
a
  half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I
 might
  run into.
 
  ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my
 head.
  Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
   thereof),
  duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)
 
  IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...
 
  Ken

 I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but
as
 for
duty
 cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about
 an
hour,
 I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can
say
 for
the
 puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.

 Thanks.

 Mathew




   
  

 --
 
  President and CTO - Arcom Communications
  Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
  http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
  AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
  http://www.irlp.net
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links






   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links













 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digest Number 2558

2004-06-11 Thread Al Wolfe
Jed,
If length matters then something is wrong. They normally only need to be
long enough to reach from one place to the other. They do need to be double
shielded or solid shielded (but not dissimilar metals shielded like 9913).

Al, K9SI


Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:49:35 -0400
From: Jed Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Duplexer cable question

 Hey guys.
 OK, I'm sure this has been discussed, but I figured I'd ask.
 I've got a wacom 220 duplexer and I think the cables between the
 transmit side of the cans and the transmitter, and the same with the
 receiver need to be replaced.
 Any ideas as far as length is concerned?
 I know there have been a lot of people saying that length matters,
 Any thoughts?
 The output frequency is 223.980.
 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 Jed








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Re the RCA Series 700 mobile ... is completely solid state - I 
 used to service them and have one here.  

  The 700 makes a dandy repeater. 

  Neil - WA6KLA 


Mike WA6ILQ wrote:
 
 At 12:08 AM 6/11/04 +, you wrote:
 
 Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
 the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
 transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
 to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
 half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
 run into.
 
 It's designed for a short duty cycle so it will get hot in minutes.
 It's not frequency stable when it gets hot.
 It will get dirty (spectrally) when it gets hot.
 
 Do yourself a BIG favor and find a 25w UHF Micor mobile.  It's
 rated for continuous duty and is EASY to convert.
 Likewise a low power Mastr-II.
 
 Or take a RCA 700 series UHF mobile radio.  Pull out the T-power
 supply subchassis and the tube PA deck subchassis. Plug the
 antenna relay connector into the exciter board  What you have left
 is a 10w continuous duty radio.  The 700 series base station is just
 as simple.
 
 Mike WA6ILQ
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Naw, the last time I did it was about $40 or so. 

  Neil 

Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
 They say ICM is the best of this, is this true?  Is that price 
 about right $100.00 per element. 
 
 Mathew
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
 Ideas
 
 
As he said before, Micor or Mastr II exciter.
 
Send in the Motorola Channel Element or GE Integrated Circuit
   Oscillator Module (ICOM) and a few bucks and get it done correctly
   the first time.
 
If you don't do it correctly the first time, you will eventually
   and suffer until you do.
 
Been there - done that !!!
 
73,
 
Neil - WA6KLA
 
  Mathew Quaife wrote:
  
   It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that
   is what I am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this
   thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much with it
   except pay the electric bill.  So if someone has an exciter that
   would work for cheap, let me know.
  
   Mathew
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
 
   Ideas
  
Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work forever.
   
Chuck
WB2EDV
   
   
   
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
 Thoughts 
Ideas
   
   

  At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
  Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull
 all
  the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
  transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the
 amp
  to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
  half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I
 might
  run into.
 
  ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my
 head.
  Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
   thereof),
  duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)
 
  IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...
 
  Ken

 I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but as
 for
duty
 cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be about
 an
hour,
 I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can say
 for
the
 puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.

 Thanks.

 Mathew




   
  
  --
 
  President and CTO - Arcom Communications
  Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
  http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
  AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
  http://www.irlp.net
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links






   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Micor EMS Duplexer

2004-06-11 Thread Albert
Can anyone give a hint as to what type of duplexer is in the Micor 
EMS UHF mobiles...???  I've looked at a downloaded .PDF manual for the
radio that says the duplexer is not field serviceable and there are 
no tuning instructions.  If anyone knows how to tune this, or has an 
idea as to what type of duplexer it is (bandpass vs bpbr) I'd 
appreciate some help.

Thanks es 73's

Albert/WB7AWL







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Ron Kelly was there during the CE-6 process.  I know as he walked 
 me through a factory fix as I did it in our shop during the early 
 seventies.  Our shop had CE-6 serial number 137.  

  Neil - WA6KLA 

Paul Finch wrote:
 
 NS Electronics is the closest you will probably find since they 
 are what's left of Cushman, sort of.  Ron Kelly was with the 
 company when it was still KNS Electronics.  When Ron left I guess 
 they dropped the K out of the name.  Ron was one of the design 
 engineers at Cushman and was responsible for the 7120 line of 
 monitors.
 
 Paul
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 11:13 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3
 
   The Cushman factory had an optional kit that became available
  later in the CE3 production ... but I don't know where to get
  the info on it.
 
   Neil
 
 Laryn Lohman wrote:
 
  Can this unit be modified to go below 450Mc?  Also are there any
  docs posted on the Web somewhere?  Thanks
 
  Laryn K8TVZ
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
Thanks Niel, actually I need a VHF exciter.  What I have is working, but
would rather have something a little better built than the regency.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts 
Ideas



   Re the RCA Series 700 mobile ... is completely solid state - I
  used to service them and have one here.

   The 700 makes a dandy repeater.

   Neil - WA6KLA


 Mike WA6ILQ wrote:
 
  At 12:08 AM 6/11/04 +, you wrote:
 
  Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull all
  the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
  transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
  to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need a
  half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I might
  run into.
 
  It's designed for a short duty cycle so it will get hot in minutes.
  It's not frequency stable when it gets hot.
  It will get dirty (spectrally) when it gets hot.
 
  Do yourself a BIG favor and find a 25w UHF Micor mobile.  It's
  rated for continuous duty and is EASY to convert.
  Likewise a low power Mastr-II.
 
  Or take a RCA 700 series UHF mobile radio.  Pull out the T-power
  supply subchassis and the tube PA deck subchassis. Plug the
  antenna relay connector into the exciter board  What you have left
  is a 10w continuous duty radio.  The 700 series base station is just
  as simple.
 
  Mike WA6ILQ
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread JOHN MACKEY
I did one for a UHF Micor about a year ago  it was about $40.

Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
   Naw, the last time I did it was about $40 or so. 
 
   Neil 
 
 Mathew Quaife wrote:
  
  They say ICM is the best of this, is this true?  Is that price 
  about right $100.00 per element. 
  
  Mathew
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
  Ideas
  
  
 As he said before, Micor or Mastr II exciter.
  
 Send in the Motorola Channel Element or GE Integrated Circuit
Oscillator Module (ICOM) and a few bucks and get it done correctly
the first time.
  
 If you don't do it correctly the first time, you will eventually
and suffer until you do.
  
 Been there - done that !!!
  
 73,
  
 Neil - WA6KLA
  
   Mathew Quaife wrote:
   
It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that
is what I am told they cost to get converted.  I just want this
thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much with it
except pay the electric bill.  So if someone has an exciter that
would work for cheap, let me know.
   
Mathew
   
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
Thoughts
  
Ideas
   
 Stick with a Micor or Mastr II exciter. Cheap, and will work
forever.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV



 - Original Message -
 From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -
  Thoughts 
 Ideas


 
   At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
   Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to
pull
  all
   the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
   transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for
the
  amp
   to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only need
a
   half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think I
  might
   run into.
  
   ---Several issues here that I can think of off the top of my
  head.
   Frequency stability, spectral purity (or more precisely, lack
thereof),
   duty cycle. And that's just for starters :-)
  
   IMHO, a bad idea from many different angles...
  
   Ken
 
  I might agree on Frequency Stability, heat may be a problem, but
as
  for
 duty
  cycle, longest this repeater would ever be keyed up would be
about
  an
 hour,
  I'd say it should handle that and much longer at 1/2 watt.  Can
say
  for
 the
  puirty until it was keyed up for awhile.
 
  Thanks.
 
  Mathew
 
 
 
 

   
  
--
  
   President and CTO - Arcom Communications
   Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and
accessories.
   http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
   AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
   http://www.irlp.net
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 







 Yahoo! Groups Links





   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread JOHN MACKEY
Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this a exotic mod
or a typo?


Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
 The first Dynamotor 
 I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
 twin v , on 6 Meter AM .






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment

2004-06-11 Thread Dave Schmidt
The weather forecast should have been your first clue.   Even though it
doesn't say exactly where it is... it have a picture of the Sears Tower
 the station is in Chicago!

Secondly, to answer the first persons issue about triangulation... that
is what they were doing by driving around. They initially took a
bearing, drove past it, took another bearing reading and then drove
around again to grab another bearing and then nailed it. Which is
entirely possible with what Hams have available to them except what
Uncle Charles has is more computerized so a monkey can operate it.

 Example: A ham - one person, not a whole fox hunt team - can drive
around, take a bearing with a yagi antenna, drive around some more and
grab a bearing and then finally drive to another location to grab a
bearing each time logging their GPS location where they took the
reading ... whalla, plot your GPS locations and bearings onto a map and
BAM! you have your triangulation with just using one tracker. This is
the old skool method, unless you have big $$$ for a computerized GPS
enhanced Doppler RDF system like the FCC.

Its far Far FAR!!! more accurate than taking one directional reading
and then accusing XYZ station for causing interference just because
that station is within or close that path from where the reading was
taken. I speak from experience since I have been the accused from a ego
sensitive, never can be wrong, blame it on everyone else person in
Hubertus, WI who will take a reading from his back yard and accuse
anyone and everyone who is on his schnit list that day who just so
happens to be within that RF path - of which his reading may be a wee
bent or favored due to the alcohol and or drugs. 

Intelligence and perseverance for accuracy will go a long way rather
than making gereral QRM accusations about an individual who one THINKS
or ASSUMES is the problem.

Dave / N9NLU








--- Paul Guello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'd like to get the rest of this video.  Any idea
 where one would look?  It says 'MetroVision 7 abc',
 but no indication of where they are.
 Paul, kb9wlc
 
 --- Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Here is a link for an interesting article about
  interference of radio
  signal and how they are  tracked down ,  I always
  thought you had to 
  Triangulate a Signal ,   Ride along with the FCC  I
  did Virus Check  files 
  are ok.
  
  Enjoy  Don KA9QJG
  
  
  
  One file is very large and the other is small
http://www.sandman.com/files/FCC-Interference.mpg
  
  http://www.sandman.com/files/FCC-Interference.wmv
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   
  
 
 
 
   
   
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread Don
At 12:16 AM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this a exotic mod
or a typo?


Probably  a senior Moment , Stupidity  or To long ago , But it was Motorola 
and it was AM .

Don KA9QJG


Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
  The first Dynamotor
  I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
  twin v , on 6 Meter AM .







Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Micor Test set

2004-06-11 Thread Don
If someone gets a chance  would You Please give Me the Wire/ Color and Pin 
number  coming off the Micor TLN1857A. I need to know  for a project Iam 
working onPTT And Mic audio In . I don't have the schematic

Thanks Don KA9QJG 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
Sounds good to me.  Figure up how much for shipping and how you want payment
and will take it from there.  How hard is it to get it converted?  I have
little to no knowlede about the motorola radios, so this is all new to me.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts 
Ideas



 --- Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks Niel, actually I need a VHF exciter.  What I
  have is working, but
  would rather have something a little better built
  than the regency.
 
  Mathew
 

 I have several of the VHF Micor mobile 400mW exciters.
 You would have to interface power, ptt, audio, etc to
 the proper pins to make it play.

 Let me know if you want one, $15 plus shipping, I'll
 throw in a channel element in the 150-160 Mhz range.

 Joe




 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://messenger.yahoo.com/





 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer cable question

2004-06-11 Thread Joe



I agree with Kevin. We had to change out hundreds of LMR cables on a large commercial system because of noise and intermod being caused by the LMR connectors, and sometimes by the LMR cable moving on the tower.

A few other points:

9913can distort the relationship of the inner conductor to the outer conductor when bent in a small radius. This can happen over time and change the impedance of the cable.

LMR and 9913 have a very light braid covering on them. This braid then attaches to the connector to make the electrical connection. In my opinion, the foil does not make a good electrical connection to the connector, so you are depending on a limited amount of braid wires to make the connection. Flexing the cable can break the braid inside the connector.

The amount of loss in a 2 foot jumper of good quality RG-214 is insignificant compared to LMR or 9913 cable. The superior connection that you can make soldering RG-214 to a connector probably more than makes up for the losses. A1 foot jumper of each type at 400Mhzwould be: 9913= .034dB RG-214= .041dB LMR-400= .025dB Using these figures, you would be saving about .016dB if you used LMR-400 insead of RG-214. This wouldhardly be worth the effort.

If you really want to go all the way and "gold plate" your system, use hardline for the jumpers. My favorite cable is Andrew 1/2 inch superflex. It makes excellent mechanical connections, 100% shielding, it will bend to small radius, and is durable. Unfortunately, UHF connectors are hard to come by for this type of cable.

Joe

Cables that are made of tin braid over aluminum foil can suffer from dissimilar metal noise problems. Those types of cables should be avoided at a duplex site.Only quality silver plated double shielded cables should be used in duplex service. Kevin Custer













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] Re: Stuck Repeater

2004-06-11 Thread Joe



I would check your COS line voltage. My first repeater that I built had a similar problem. I was using a Hamtronics controller and a Midland receiver. The COS line voltage was running somewhere in the 1 volt range when the receiver was active. (Hard to remember specific voltages). Anyway, I was in a range of voltage that the controller was geting confused if it was suppose to key up the transmiter or not. Any change in temperature or voltage or noise on the line made it get stuck in the keyed mode. I fixed this by adding a coupe of transistors to pull the line closed to ground when the receiver was active and added a "pull up" resistor to pull the line closer to 12VDC when the reciever was idle. Instant reliability of the receiver!

Different controllers mayneed different voltages to tell it if the input is acitve or idle. For example, my S-Comm controllers use 2.1VDC as the crossover point. You need to pull the COS line above or below this voltage to indicate active/idle COS.

73, Joe, K1ike

Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com wrote:
rtoplus wrote:Well I visited the site and powered down everything...let it all rest for about 5 minutes. After powering back up, everything seems fine. The heat sink was hot as a firecracker, naturally (got up to 90 degrees here today as well and the repeaters are in a tupperware tool/garden house). 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts Ideas

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Hello Mathew, 

  Knowing Regency, yes I was called upon to (attempt) to service one 
 once, *almost* anything in GE, RCA or Motorola or even a Bendix 
 mobile radio will be better. 

  When I mention Bendix, they made a certain mobile radio that, it 
 seemed, someone had borrowed (ok, swiped) ideas elsewhere.  The 
 tubed receiver almost looked like a Motorola Research Line receiver 
 strip.  The transmitter looked very similar to a GE Progress Line. 
 (I think I remember the power supply as being a regurgitated form of 
 an RCA?) 

  You may not know it, these days, in the mobile radio world, only 
 General Electric and Motorola seem to still stand out - at least in 
 the United states.  Over the years, there were a few others some of 
 us would really rather try to forget. 

  Even Motorola and General Electric had some clinkers that were ... 
 well let's say, not the best in reliability or really serviceable.  
 Each radio tech I have known over the years had his own less than 
 favorable product he had a slightly different name for.  ;) 

  I will relate this one story ... a certain manufacturer made a UHF 
 radio (the only one I ever saw was a base - but were made in a 
 mobile package too.)  The receiver ... took a 75 MHz range crystal  
 tubed oscillator / tripler (one stage) fed that signal to the diode 
 frequency doubler stage which was also the first mixer.  One stage of 
 RF amplification prior to the diode first mixer then into the IF 
 amplifier chain.  When everything was new, sensitivity was ... er, 
 ah, well, ok at best ... 

  I will leave this here ... at 4:30am 


  Neil 


Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
 Thanks Niel, actually I need a VHF exciter.  What I have is working, 
 but would rather have something a little better built than the 
 regency.
 
 Mathew
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts 
 Ideas
 

   Re the RCA Series 700 mobile ... is completely solid state - I
  used to service them and have one here.

   The 700 makes a dandy repeater.

   Neil - WA6KLA


 Mike WA6ILQ wrote:

 At 12:08 AM 6/11/04 +, you wrote:

Need some input on this, what others think.  I am trying to pull 
all the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
transmitter.  I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the 
amp to the repeater.  What are some thoughts on this.  I only 
need a half watt to drive the amp.  Any problems anyone can think 
I might run into.

 It's designed for a short duty cycle so it will get hot in minutes.
 It's not frequency stable when it gets hot.
 It will get dirty (spectrally) when it gets hot.

 Do yourself a BIG favor and find a 25w UHF Micor mobile.  It's
 rated for continuous duty and is EASY to convert.
 Likewise a low power Mastr-II.

 Or take a RCA 700 series UHF mobile radio.  Pull out the T-power
 supply subchassis and the tube PA deck subchassis. Plug the
 antenna relay connector into the exciter board  What you have 
 left is a 10w continuous duty radio.  The 700 series base station 
 is just as simple.

 Mike WA6ILQ







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Or one hell of a 'slight' modification ... 

  Neil 

JOHN MACKEY wrote:
 
 Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this 
 a exotic mod or a typo? 
 
 Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 SNIP
  The first Dynamotor
  I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
  twin v , on 6 Meter AM .
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Looks like someone finally figured it out ... ;) 

  Neil 

Dave Schmidt wrote:
 
 The weather forecast should have been your first clue.   Even though it
 doesn't say exactly where it is... it have a picture of the Sears Tower
  the station is in Chicago!
 
 Secondly, to answer the first persons issue about triangulation... that
 is what they were doing by driving around. They initially took a
 bearing, drove past it, took another bearing reading and then drove
 around again to grab another bearing and then nailed it. Which is
 entirely possible with what Hams have available to them except what
 Uncle Charles has is more computerized so a monkey can operate it.
 
  Example: A ham - one person, not a whole fox hunt team - can drive
 around, take a bearing with a yagi antenna, drive around some more and
 grab a bearing and then finally drive to another location to grab a
 bearing each time logging their GPS location where they took the
 reading ... whalla, plot your GPS locations and bearings onto a map and
 BAM! you have your triangulation with just using one tracker. This is
 the old skool method, unless you have big $$$ for a computerized GPS
 enhanced Doppler RDF system like the FCC.
 
 Its far Far FAR!!! more accurate than taking one directional reading
 and then accusing XYZ station for causing interference just because
 that station is within or close that path from where the reading was
 taken. I speak from experience since I have been the accused from a ego
 sensitive, never can be wrong, blame it on everyone else person in
 Hubertus, WI who will take a reading from his back yard and accuse
 anyone and everyone who is on his schnit list that day who just so
 happens to be within that RF path - of which his reading may be a wee
 bent or favored due to the alcohol and or drugs.
 
 Intelligence and perseverance for accuracy will go a long way rather
 than making gereral QRM accusations about an individual who one THINKS
 or ASSUMES is the problem.
 
 Dave / N9NLU
 
 --- Paul Guello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'd like to get the rest of this video.  Any idea
  where one would look?  It says 'MetroVision 7 abc',
  but no indication of where they are.
  Paul, kb9wlc
 
  --- Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Here is a link for an interesting article about
   interference of radio
   signal and how they are  tracked down ,  I always
   thought you had to
   Triangulate a Signal ,   Ride along with the FCC  I
   did Virus Check  files
   are ok.
  
   Enjoy  Don KA9QJG
  





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Test set

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Kinda depends on what you are looking for ... I have the 
 Micor Station Manual here for the 406-420, 450-470 and 470-512 
 MHz stations.  Manual part number 68P81025E50. 

  Metering and Intercom schematic diagrams etc.

  Perhaps if I talked to you on the telephone?  Might be simpler that 
 way? 

  Neil - WA6KLA 

Don wrote:
 
 If someone gets a chance  would You Please give Me the Wire/ Color and Pin
 number  coming off the Micor TLN1857A. I need to know  for a project Iam
 working onPTT And Mic audio In . I don't have the schematic
 
 Thanks Don KA9QJG
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3

2004-06-11 Thread Paul Finch
Neil,

He was there during the 7120 process also, I visited the Cushman plant and
talked directly to him about adding a simulcast option to the 7120 line of
monitors.  After that option was added the company I worked for bought about
15 of them.  All I can tell you is that he said he was the lead engineer
on the 7120 line.

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:28 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3



  Ron Kelly was there during the CE-6 process.  I know as he walked
 me through a factory fix as I did it in our shop during the early
 seventies.  Our shop had CE-6 serial number 137.

  Neil - WA6KLA

Paul Finch wrote:

 NS Electronics is the closest you will probably find since they
 are what's left of Cushman, sort of.  Ron Kelly was with the
 company when it was still KNS Electronics.  When Ron left I guess
 they dropped the K out of the name.  Ron was one of the design
 engineers at Cushman and was responsible for the 7120 line of
 monitors.

 Paul

 -Original Message-
 From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 11:13 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3

   The Cushman factory had an optional kit that became available
  later in the CE3 production ... but I don't know where to get
  the info on it.

   Neil

 Laryn Lohman wrote:
 
  Can this unit be modified to go below 450Mc?  Also are there any
  docs posted on the Web somewhere?  Thanks
 
  Laryn K8TVZ
 
 

 Yahoo! Groups Links


 Yahoo! Groups Links










Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment

2004-06-11 Thread Mike Perryman
Actually ...  I contacted the owner of the site where the files are
located...  this was Mike's reply.  I posted his reply yesterday...  or so I
thought.  If I did I apologize for the wasted bandwidth..  Mike can be
contacted at the following URL..  http://www.sandman.com/ by clicking on
the contact us link

73's
Mike Perryman
K5JMP
*
Hi.

It's painful to transfer this stuff to a computer file, and the files are 
huge at a reasonable resolution (an uncompressed avi version of what you 
saw is 125 meg). I just did it because I don't think many people will ever 
see (or notice?) an FCC Police Car.

It was recorded off G4-TechTV, from a program called The Screen
Savers. 
They will probably replay it at some point. They had recently gone to 
Washington, and did a lot of stuff at the FCC.

TechTV was recently bought out by Comcast, who threw away the TechTV site, 
so I don't think you'll find it or info on it at their site - but you might?

They just showed clipping a couple of inductive gizmos on a fake power line 
to send/receive the data, showed an old X10 gizmo (I don't know why?), and 
a circular antenna on a tripod that was picking up emissions (with the 
emissions shown on a spectrum display from 5 feet away, for a few seconds). 
About 2.5 minutes total, primarily with Powell talking about the future of 
BPL in general terms.

The testing they talked about for a moment was very vague. The whole thing 
was vague.

I can have our video guy put the whole 1 hour program on a VHS tape if 
you'd like (easier than finding that part of it). $25 plus shipping for his 
time to screw around with it (he might have time next week). It would cost 
A LOT more to put it in a video file (it took two hours to do what you saw).

Mike

***


-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 8:02 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment



  Looks like someone finally figured it out ... ;) 

  Neil 

Dave Schmidt wrote:
 
 The weather forecast should have been your first clue.   Even though it
 doesn't say exactly where it is... it have a picture of the Sears Tower
  the station is in Chicago!
 
 Secondly, to answer the first persons issue about triangulation... that
 is what they were doing by driving around. They initially took a
 bearing, drove past it, took another bearing reading and then drove
 around again to grab another bearing and then nailed it. Which is
 entirely possible with what Hams have available to them except what
 Uncle Charles has is more computerized so a monkey can operate it.
 
  Example: A ham - one person, not a whole fox hunt team - can drive
 around, take a bearing with a yagi antenna, drive around some more and
 grab a bearing and then finally drive to another location to grab a
 bearing each time logging their GPS location where they took the
 reading ... whalla, plot your GPS locations and bearings onto a map and
 BAM! you have your triangulation with just using one tracker. This is
 the old skool method, unless you have big $$$ for a computerized GPS
 enhanced Doppler RDF system like the FCC.
 
 Its far Far FAR!!! more accurate than taking one directional reading
 and then accusing XYZ station for causing interference just because
 that station is within or close that path from where the reading was
 taken. I speak from experience since I have been the accused from a ego
 sensitive, never can be wrong, blame it on everyone else person in
 Hubertus, WI who will take a reading from his back yard and accuse
 anyone and everyone who is on his schnit list that day who just so
 happens to be within that RF path - of which his reading may be a wee
 bent or favored due to the alcohol and or drugs.
 
 Intelligence and perseverance for accuracy will go a long way rather
 than making gereral QRM accusations about an individual who one THINKS
 or ASSUMES is the problem.
 
 Dave / N9NLU
 
 --- Paul Guello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'd like to get the rest of this video.  Any idea
  where one would look?  It says 'MetroVision 7 abc',
  but no indication of where they are.
  Paul, kb9wlc
 
  --- Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Here is a link for an interesting article about
   interference of radio
   signal and how they are  tracked down ,  I always
   thought you had to
   Triangulate a Signal ,   Ride along with the FCC  I
   did Virus Check  files
   are ok.
  
   Enjoy  Don KA9QJG
  





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
attachment: winmail.dat

RE: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment

2004-06-11 Thread Mike Perryman
One other item...  Dave gets the att'a boy..  Chicago is correct!!
Mike

At 10:55 AM 06/11/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Actually ...  I contacted the owner of the site where the files are
located...  this was Mike's reply.  I posted his reply yesterday...  or so I
thought.  If I did I apologize for the wasted bandwidth..  Mike can be
contacted at the following URL..  http://www.sandman.com/ by clicking on
the contact us link

73's
Mike Perryman
K5JMP
*
Hi.

It's painful to transfer this stuff to a computer file, and the files are
huge at a reasonable resolution (an uncompressed avi version of what you
saw is 125 meg). I just did it because I don't think many people will ever
see (or notice?) an FCC Police Car.

 It was recorded off G4-TechTV, from a program called The Screen
Savers.
They will probably replay it at some point. They had recently gone to
Washington, and did a lot of stuff at the FCC.

TechTV was recently bought out by Comcast, who threw away the TechTV site,
so I don't think you'll find it or info on it at their site - but you might?

They just showed clipping a couple of inductive gizmos on a fake power line
to send/receive the data, showed an old X10 gizmo (I don't know why?), and
a circular antenna on a tripod that was picking up emissions (with the
emissions shown on a spectrum display from 5 feet away, for a few seconds).
About 2.5 minutes total, primarily with Powell talking about the future of
BPL in general terms.

The testing they talked about for a moment was very vague. The whole thing
was vague.

I can have our video guy put the whole 1 hour program on a VHS tape if
you'd like (easier than finding that part of it). $25 plus shipping for his
time to screw around with it (he might have time next week). It would cost
A LOT more to put it in a video file (it took two hours to do what you saw).

Mike

***


-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 8:02 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC Enforcment




-
   Mike PerrymanCavell, Mertz  Davis, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Consulting Engineers
   http://www.cmdconsulting.com 7839 Ashton Avenue
   K5JMPManassas, VA 20109   USA
   (703) 392-9090; (703) 392-9559 fax;  DC Line (202) 332-0110
- 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer cable question

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife





Ok, couple of questions. Is RG400 a solid 
center conductor, or is it stranded. The Cable that I have here was 
supposed to be LMR400, but that is made by Times Microwave, and the cable that I 
used on the repeater is made by Ultralink, Cushcradt, Manchester NH. Does 
not really have any other figures on it. Also, if the shield is made of 
steel, and is not magnetic, then how would one get solder to stick to it. 
Or is this why some guys are going to the crimp on connectors? I have 
plenty of 1/2 superflex avaialable, but you are right, the connectors are hard 
to come by in UHF. Duplexers have type N, but it is easy to change the 
connector in the radio's to Type N. I also have a good amount of 3/8" 
hardline, FSJ something or other, Superflex cable, would that be as good as the 
RG-400? Thanks for the information. The help is more than 
appreciate.

Mathew


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Joe 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:46 AM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer 
  cable question
  
  I agree with Kevin. We had to change out hundreds of LMR cables on 
  a large commercial system because of noise and intermod being caused by the 
  LMR connectors, and sometimes by the LMR cable moving on the tower.
  
  A few other points:
  
  9913can distort the relationship of the inner conductor to the 
  outer conductor when bent in a small radius. This can happen over time 
  and change the impedance of the cable.
  
  LMR and 9913 have a very light braid covering on them. This braid 
  then attaches to the connector to make the electrical connection. In my 
  opinion, the foil does not make a good electrical connection to the connector, 
  so you are depending on a limited amount of braid wires to make the 
  connection. Flexing the cable can break the braid inside the 
  connector.
  
  The amount of loss in a 2 foot jumper of good quality RG-214 is 
  insignificant compared to LMR or 9913 cable. The superior connection 
  that you can make soldering RG-214 to a connector probably more than makes up 
  for the losses. A1 foot jumper of each type at 400Mhzwould 
  be: 9913= .034dB RG-214= .041dB LMR-400= 
  .025dB Using these figures, you would be saving about .016dB if you used 
  LMR-400 insead of RG-214. This wouldhardly be worth the 
  effort.
  
  If you really want to go all the way and "gold plate" your system, use 
  hardline for the jumpers. My favorite cable is Andrew 1/2 inch 
  superflex. It makes excellent mechanical connections, 100% shielding, it 
  will bend to small radius, and is durable. Unfortunately, UHF connectors 
  are hard to come by for this type of cable.
  
  Joe
  
  Cables that are made of tin braid over aluminum foil can suffer from 
  dissimilar metal noise problems. Those types of cables should be 
  avoided at a duplex site.Only quality silver plated double shielded 
  cables should be used in duplex service. Kevin 
  Custer













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3

2004-06-11 Thread HQ54





In a message dated 6/10/2004 8:09:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NS Electronics is the closest you will probably find since they are what'sleft of Cushman, sort of. Ron Kelly was with the company when it was stillKNS Electronics. When Ron left I guess they dropped the "K" out of thename. Ron was one of the design engineers at Cushman and was responsiblefor the 7120 line of monitors.Paul
About 5 or so years ago, I had my CE-3 repaired, and tuned by NS Electronics. I was way happy with the results. You probably will be also.

Michael













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Are there any Channel Elements in it? 

  Neil 

w9mwq wrote:
 
 I just got a 4 channel micor radio, T73RTN3180B radio, actually two
 radio's and one set on control heads.  The radio comes on, has good
 volume, and squelch works, but there is no receiver sensitivity, nor
 power ouput.  Both radios do the exact same thing.  I'm thinking
 control head, but everything seems to be hooked up.
 
 Mathew






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed

2004-06-11 Thread w9mwq
I just got a 4 channel micor radio, T73RTN3180B radio, actually two 
radio's and one set on control heads.  The radio comes on, has good 
volume, and squelch works, but there is no receiver sensitivity, nor 
power ouput.  Both radios do the exact same thing.  I'm thinking 
control head, but everything seems to be hooked up.

Mathew






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed

2004-06-11 Thread Mathew Quaife
Yes, they are in the 163 Mhz range.  When I press the mic button the radio
keys up, just no power output.

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed



   Are there any Channel Elements in it?

   Neil

 w9mwq wrote:
 
  I just got a 4 channel micor radio, T73RTN3180B radio, actually two
  radio's and one set on control heads.  The radio comes on, has good
  volume, and squelch works, but there is no receiver sensitivity, nor
  power ouput.  Both radios do the exact same thing.  I'm thinking
  control head, but everything seems to be hooked up.
 
  Mathew
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread JOHN MACKEY
Was it a 5V?  (I think they did make AM 5V's - Neil do you know this bit of
history??)

Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 12:16 AM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
 Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this a exotic
mod
 or a typo?
 
 
 Probably  a senior Moment , Stupidity  or To long ago , But it was Motorola

 and it was AM .
 
 Don KA9QJG
 
 
 Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 SNIP
   The first Dynamotor
   I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
   twin v , on 6 Meter AM .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Speaking of Cushmans

2004-06-11 Thread Larry Williams
You're welcome, glad to be of service...




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Perhaps ... 

  1) the Channel Elements are on a frequency that the radio is not 
 tuned to or ... 

  2) there are no crystals in those Channel Elements ... 

  3) the ground return for the Channel Elements selector switch in 
 the control head is not connected to ground - anywhere. 

  Neil 


Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
 Yes, they are in the 163 Mhz range.  When I press the mic button 
 the radio keys up, just no power output. 
 
 Mathew
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:44 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed
 
 
Are there any Channel Elements in it?
 
Neil
 
  w9mwq wrote:
  
   I just got a 4 channel micor radio, T73RTN3180B radio, actually two
   radio's and one set on control heads.  The radio comes on, has good
   volume, and squelch works, but there is no receiver sensitivity, nor
   power ouput.  Both radios do the exact same thing.  I'm thinking
   control head, but everything seems to be hooked up.
  
   Mathew
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  I certainly remember the 5V ... but never saw one on AM. 

  Neil 


JOHN MACKEY wrote:
 
 Was it a 5V?  (I think they did make AM 5V's - Neil do you know 
 this bit of history??)
 
 Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  At 12:16 AM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
  Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this a exotic
 mod
  or a typo?
 
 
  Probably  a senior Moment , Stupidity  or To long ago , But it was Motorola
 
  and it was AM .
 
  Don KA9QJG
 
 
  Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  SNIP
The first Dynamotor
I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
twin v , on 6 Meter AM .
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread Mike WA6ILQ
The web page at http://www.mbay.net/~wb6nvh/Motadata.htm might
help answer this question.

At 01:07 PM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:

Was it a 5V?  (I think they did make AM 5V's - Neil do you know this bit of
history??)

Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  At 12:16 AM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
  Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this a exotic
mod
  or a typo?
 
 
  Probably  a senior Moment , Stupidity  or To long ago , But it was Motorola

  and it was AM .
 
  Don KA9QJG
 
 
  Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  SNIP
The first Dynamotor
I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
twin v , on 6 Meter AM .
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 








Yahoo! Groups Links









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR-2000 parts/repair needed

2004-06-11 Thread Neil McKie

  Thanks Mike, 

  Neil 


Mike WA6ILQ wrote:
 
 The web page at http://www.mbay.net/~wb6nvh/Motadata.htm might
 help answer this question.
 
 At 01:07 PM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
 
 Was it a 5V?  (I think they did make AM 5V's - Neil do you know this bit of
 history??)
 
 Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   At 12:16 AM 6/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
   Since Moto never made AM twin V's (that I am aware of), was this a exotic
 mod
   or a typo?
  
  
   Probably  a senior Moment , Stupidity  or To long ago , But it was 
   Motorola
 
   and it was AM .
  
   Don KA9QJG
  
  
   Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   SNIP
 The first Dynamotor
 I saw was when I gave a Ham a jump start , He was using a Motorola
 twin v , on 6 Meter AM .
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] RE:Micor 1/4K power supply enquirer

2004-06-11 Thread Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio
will the party what called me early this week in
search of a TPN(i cant remember the
number)hi-voltage supply for uhf 250w station...I
should have looked. i have one..it weighs a ton
but I have it. Please call me monday and we'll
arrange to get it to you somehow.
Ted/MDM   708-681-0300

=
Ted Bleiman K9MDM
MDM Radio Ltd - 
1629-B N. 31 st Ave 
Melrose Park, IL 60160 
708.681.0300 fax 708.681.9800 
web http://www.mdmradio.com - all new check it out!!!
See our website for DAYTON RAINOUT SPECIALS








__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Spirit MU21CV Radio Frequencies

2004-06-11 Thread w9mwq
I know this is a bit off thread, but can anyone tell me what the 
actual frequencies of these radios should be.  I'm getting some 
weird ones out of them, mid channels if you will.  Like 467.761, but 
freq chart says that should be 467.775.  Is this true or is this 
unit I have just off frequency?  Thanks.

Mathew






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/