Re: [Repeater-Builder]Transmitting interior temperature

2007-01-21 Thread k1ike_mail
I did a search for talking thermometer and came up with the following item for 
about 20 bucks:
http://www.sightconnection.com/plu-477.html

If your controller has outputs that you can control by touchtone you can wire 
the output to the pushbutton on the thermometer.  Then couple the audio of the 
thermometer to the repeater transmitter.  You can then query the repeater for 
temperature whenever you wanted.  You would have to keep the repeater keyed up 
during the talking, possibly by a macro in the coontroller if it has that 
ability.  This is an indoor-outdoor thermometer so you could read the temp both 
inside and outside the cabinet.

If you lack outputs on your controller you could wire up a circuit to key up 
the repeater and send the temperature once an hour or so.

Joe

 -- Original message --
From: Butch Kanvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I have a 440 repeater at a high mountain location.
 I would like to know the interior temperature of the repeater building.
 The building is heated.
 Does anyone know how I can connect a voice sytem to the 440 repeater to 
 transmit the temperature, when the repeater ID's?
 
 Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
 
 I might have to use a data link to retrieve the information also.
 
 Thanks, Butch, KE7FEL
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Base Station Amp Problem-CURED

2007-01-21 Thread Milt
I believe there is a conversion article on the repeater-builder web site 
that gives a method of using the antenna switch transistor on the station 
control board to switch the F1 lead to ground on PTT.

Milt
N3LTQ


- Original Message - 
From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:38 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Base Station Amp Problem-CURED


 Hi all, I just found the problem with this transmitter, problem
 described below.  To force F1 at all times on the exciter, I jumped
 from the channel element pin to Switched A-.  NOT a good idea.  Doing
 that apparently creates a ground loop and an oscillation at around
 50kc.  It did this with two different exciters.  Moving the ground to
 A- completely fixed the problem.

 This was driving me NUTS.  There probably is a proper place to force
 F1, but for now I'll leave it on A-.  It keeps the channel element
 active all the time, which is annoying during bench work while
 monitoring on-channel.

 Laryn K8TVZ


 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 Hi all, I have a base station that came with a TLE1703 amp. It was a
 part of Medcom equipment at a local hospital. I took it out of
 storage last week, and it keyed up fine, with about 40 watts out. I
 also have a TLE1713 amp from another station, and after quickly
 swapping it with the 1703, it too seemed fine with about 70 watts out.

 After moving things around in the cabinet last nite, and having the
 1713 amp installed, I noticed an arcing noise from the amp. Keying
 the amp with the cover off revealed arcing at random places near the
 negative DC bus, and the 4.7uf capacitors getting very hot. Since
 this amp shows evidence of being serviced at some point, I decided to
 move back to the original 1703 amp. This amp is very clean inside and
 shows no evidence of ever being serviced. This amp too will arc with
 the capacitors getting very hot after only a few seconds of keydown.

 So what could be the problem. I am using a good wattmeter and load.
 Is there something in the antenna network after the amp that could be
 bad?  I measured the SWR looking into the antenna network with the
 load on the other end and it shows 2.1:1. Isn't that a little high??
 Or maybe the caps are simply old and dried out?

 Where do I look for the problem?

 Laryn K8TVZ








 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Repeater-Builder] AEA Isopole data needed atrepeater-builder... file cabinet checking time...

2007-01-21 Thread Gary
Mike,
I see you have updated the AEA on the RB website but I also noticed you have
AEA Technologies listed a a division of Tempo Research. Tempo sold AEA about 5
years ago to a private owner who nows operates the company through some
partners so AEA is no longer affiliated with Tempo. I am privy to all this
because the owner is a long time friend of mine. At your next opportunity would
you update the RB webpage by removing the division of Tempo Research? The new
owners still operate out of Vista, CA. and they still use the AEA Technology,
Inc. name (for a while they were AEA Wireless).
Thanks,
Gary



Re: [Repeater-Builder]Transmitting interior temperature

2007-01-21 Thread Charles Schmell
I believe the CAT line of controllers can interfeace
to a Davis or Peet weatherstation, reading all the
parameters including temp, back through the repeater.
Check out info at www.catauto.com.  I have no
affiliation, just have a CAT-1000 on the club
repeater. (no wx interface, though) Think others can
do the same, although it's pricey if you have to buy a
new controller plus the weather station. The talking
thermometer sounds like a neat and inexpensive
solution, though

Chas, KB3CEZ
  -- Original message
 --
 From: Butch Kanvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I have a 440 repeater at a high mountain location.
  I would like to know the interior temperature of
 the repeater building.
  The building is heated.
  Does anyone know how I can connect a voice sytem
 to the 440 repeater to 
  transmit the temperature, when the repeater ID's?
  
  Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
  
  I might have to use a data link to retrieve the
 information also.
  
  Thanks, Butch, KE7FEL
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 (Yahoo! ID required)
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 


RE: [Repeater-Builder]Transmitting interior temperature

2007-01-21 Thread Eric Lemmon
Some outboard repeater controllers have an analog input made especially for
an RTD (Resistance Temperature Detector) element.  All you have to do is
purchase the correct RTD sensor (a few bucks) and connect it to the
controller with shielded twisted-pair cable.  A few simple calibration
steps, and you're done.  Nothing could be simpler.

The controller can be programmed to respond with a voice announcement of the
temperature with a DTMF command, or you can program it to automatically
broadcast a warning message if the temperature is not within the programmed
setpoints.  I believe that Link offers this feature on several models, and
so does Pacific Research.  Others must do the same...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Schmell
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:27 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]Transmitting interior temperature

I believe the CAT line of controllers can interfeace
to a Davis or Peet weatherstation, reading all the
parameters including temp, back through the repeater.
Check out info at www.catauto.com. I have no
affiliation, just have a CAT-1000 on the club
repeater. (no wx interface, though) Think others can
do the same, although it's pricey if you have to buy a
new controller plus the weather station. The talking
thermometer sounds like a neat and inexpensive
solution, though

Chas, KB3CEZ
 -- Original message
 --
 From: Butch Kanvick [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:hotlrv%40hotmail.com 
  I have a 440 repeater at a high mountain location.
  I would like to know the interior temperature of
 the repeater building.
  The building is heated.
  Does anyone know how I can connect a voice sytem
 to the 440 repeater to 
  transmit the temperature, when the repeater ID's?
  
  Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
  
  I might have to use a data link to retrieve the
 information also.
  
  Thanks, Butch, KE7FEL




RE: [Repeater-Builder]Transmitting interior temperature

2007-01-21 Thread Ken Arck
At 10:10 AM 1/21/2007, you wrote:


I believe that Link offers this feature on several models, and
so does Pacific Research. Others must do the same...

As do we of course :-)

http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/rc210/rc210.html

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net



Re: [Repeater-Builder]Transmitting interior temperature

2007-01-21 Thread Mathew Quaife
Another option to consider.  KH2D has a program that rides along with Echolink. 
 If you obtain a weather system that is compatable with ambient weather, it 
will read the information for you under this program, thus not needing to tie 
anything additional to the controller other than the echolink interface.  The 
program is very nicely done, also can serve as an announcement system for 
simple repeater controllers.
   
  Mathew
  

Charles Schmell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I believe the CAT line of controllers can interfeace
to a Davis or Peet weatherstation, reading all the
parameters including temp, back through the repeater.
Check out info at www.catauto.com. I have no
affiliation, just have a CAT-1000 on the club
repeater. (no wx interface, though) Think others can
do the same, although it's pricey if you have to buy a
new controller plus the weather station. The talking
thermometer sounds like a neat and inexpensive
solution, though

Chas, KB3CEZ
 -- Original message
 --
 From: Butch Kanvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I have a 440 repeater at a high mountain location.
  I would like to know the interior temperature of
 the repeater building.
  The building is heated.
  Does anyone know how I can connect a voice sytem
 to the 440 repeater to 
  transmit the temperature, when the repeater ID's?
  
  Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
  
  I might have to use a data link to retrieve the
 information also.
  
  Thanks, Butch, KE7FEL
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 (Yahoo! ID required)
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

__
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 


 

 
-
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Celwave Preselector Tuning

2007-01-21 Thread Jeff DePolo
 There are 7 stubs, 4 are on the pass cans, 3 in-between the 4
 resonators. Adjusting any of the 3 stubs (between each of the 4
 resonators) has little effect on the skirt.

The between adjust the size of the aperature (coupling) between filters.
You won't find a whole lot of change in the passband response as you adjust
them; that's just the way they are (or at least on the few dozen or so of
those that I've tuned).

--- Jeff



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Remote Base to a Repeater

2007-01-21 Thread skipp025
 ldgelectronics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, the tower spacing is vertical (not horizontal), yes the 
 tx/rx on the repeater is 443.3 and 448.3 (5 MHz split)

Don't get sideways over the vert/horz terms. We would be concerned 
with both the vertical and horizontal locations.  Vertical distance 
is an easy best bang for the buck option.  But horizontal distance 
and location per side of a tower is also quite handy.  

 Ok, now to fill in some of the blanks I left out. This is why the 
 group is so coolÂ… things I thought were meaningless turned out to be 
 important. The repeater power is 20 watts, the remote base is 10 
 watts.

Relative to the grand scheme of things... your power output is not 
that big of a problem to work with. 

 The repeater is an Exec II. The remote base is a Kenwood TK-805 
 (just because I have a stack of them). The broadness of the 
 TK-805 is part of the problem and this could all go away by 
 switching to another Exec II for the remote base.

I've seen a lot of tk-805d radios used as links... and they are 
very popular animals. It would be worth your while to include some 
band pass selection (cavities typical) in series with the radio.

 For the splits, we have both (high TX and low TX) here in Maryland. 
 The overall plan is to connect the new repeater with the remote base 
 to an existing hub repeater on 449.225 TX and 444.225 RX. 

Clint Eastwood called it a cluster $%^ in one of his movies. 

Keep in mind the closest frequency spacing from any transmitter 
to any receiver is your largest gorilla in the room. 

 Skipp, I like the additional notch in the repeater duplexer trick. 
 That alone may do it. 

I do a lot of close spaced in-band commercial radio repeating and 
the notch in the reciver antenna path is da dope to take out the 
unwanted visitor.   If this is a fixed frequency remote used only 
for repeater linking... then you should also include a notch or 
suck out cavity on the remote radio, tuned to the repeater 
transmitter frequency.   We would assume the remote radio to 
be operated half duplex? 

 I did the T-to-T thing with 2 and 4 band pass cans. The loss 
 was in the 5-6 db range with 2 cans on each side. Not 
 really worth it. If it were 2db per side, I would live with it.

Something is wrong with your setup... you should be able to do  
better than the 5-6 dB loss value.  Since your power levels are 
relatively modest (vs what they could be) you could actually 
replace the band-pass cavities dual port-hole with simple suck 
out notch cavities on the unwanted frequencies as long as 
things don't get too crazy with choices of frequencies, power 
level and a few other considerations.  

 Thanks again for all of the input. Sometimes just talking it through 
 helps a bunch.
 Dwayne Kincaid
 WD8OYG

Just think of the gas money you'll save by not having to drive to 
the repeater site to disable a locked up link/remote base system. 

cheers, 
skipp 



[Repeater-Builder] Motorola MSR-2000

2007-01-21 Thread ve7jz
Can anyone tell me about this model Number?

ACC43K5B1100AT2



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola MSR-2000

2007-01-21 Thread Eric Lemmon
I think your model number (note that the 5 should be an S) breaks down
like this:

AC - Built in Canada
C - Compa Station cabinet
4 - 40 watts
3 - 136-174 MHz (split is not specified)
KSB - MSR2000 Repeater
1 - Carrier Squelch
1 - Narrow Band
00 - Single frequency TX and RX
AT2 - Version level

I have heard of some Canadian MSR2000 stations that were numbered as if they
were repeaters, but were base stations.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ve7jz
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:09 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola MSR-2000

Can anyone tell me about this model Number?

ACC43K5B1100AT2




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola MSR-2000

2007-01-21 Thread nj902
The ACC43KSB MSR 2000 stations are rated at 30 Watts power output
continuous duty [variable down to 15 Watts].  These models were
introduced in early 1991 and came in a 24 tall cabinet.




--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, ve7jz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me about this model Number?
 
ACC43K5B1100AT2



[Repeater-Builder] Wanted Micor elements on 443.750 rptr pair

2007-01-21 Thread n3dab
To the group,

Lookig for good working set of xtaled elements for a Micor Rptr. 
Station. 

I need 1. KXN1052A Tx on 443.750 Mhz and 1. KXN1024A Rx on 448.750 
Mhz.  I will consider just the xtals if thats all you have but prefer 
complete factory or ICC re-xtaled and compensated elements. 

TX Fo = Fc/36 = 12.326388  and for Rx Fo = Fc-11.7/24 = 18.208333

Please contact me off list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have a good pair of 
pulls just laying around.

N3DAB 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Base Station Amp Problem-CURED

2007-01-21 Thread Kevin Custer
Laryn Lohman wrote:
 Hi all, I just found the problem with this transmitter, problem
 described below.  To force F1 at all times on the exciter, I jumped
 from the channel element pin to Switched A-.  NOT a good idea.  Doing
 that apparently creates a ground loop and an oscillation at around
 50kc.  It did this with two different exciters.  Moving the ground to
 A- completely fixed the problem.

 This was driving me NUTS.  There probably is a proper place to force
 F1, but for now I'll leave it on A-.  It keeps the channel element
 active all the time, which is annoying during bench work while
 monitoring on-channel.

We use the Antenna Relay switching transistor in the Station Control Module.
http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/stationcontrol.html
http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/newerstationcontrol.html

Kevin Custer
Repeater Builder


[Repeater-Builder] Re: AEA

2007-01-21 Thread sgreact47
Is this the same AEA that makes the 140-520 Analizer ?
I have one that has been returned once already..does not work 
corrcetly above 440mhz...


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mike,
 I see you have updated the AEA on the RB website but I also noticed 
you have
 AEA Technologies listed a a division of Tempo Research. Tempo sold 
AEA about 5
 years ago to a private owner who nows operates the company through 
some
 partners so AEA is no longer affiliated with Tempo. I am privy to 
all this
 because the owner is a long time friend of mine. At your next 
opportunity would
 you update the RB webpage by removing the division of Tempo 
Research? The new
 owners still operate out of Vista, CA. and they still use the AEA 
Technology,
 Inc. name (for a while they were AEA Wireless).
 Thanks,
 Gary





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Base Station Amp Problem-CURED

2007-01-21 Thread Laryn Lohman

 We use the Antenna Relay switching transistor in the Station Control
Module.
 http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/stationcontrol.html
 http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/newerstationcontrol.html
 
 Kevin Custer
 Repeater Builder


Thanks Kevin.  I think I'll change to that method soon.  Got to get
rid of that constant on-channel signal.  Who woulda thought that a
simple jumper on the exciter board would cause such a wierd problem...
 Learned once again.

Laryn K8TVZ




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: coordination question for the seasoned owners

2007-01-21 Thread no6b
At 1/19/2007 19:16, you wrote:

You ARE aware that if someone else gets coordination there and the FCC
gets involved, you *will lose*, right?

Not necessarily.  If you can prove that you tried to cooperate with the 
frequency coordinator in good faith  the coordinator failed to respond in 
kind, the FCC will do little past the letter of inquiry.  I have witnessed 
this first hand.

Bob NO6B




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: coordination question for the seasoned owners

2007-01-21 Thread no6b
At 1/19/2007 20:49, you wrote:
Yes,

No obligation to co-ordinate your repeater. However, and this I have seen 
this personally,(fortunately in my favor) in an interference issue or 
complaint the first question the FCC asks is this repeater coordinated?

Correct.

  Even if you have been on that pair for centuries and the coordinators 
 have issued coordination of that pair to someone else, the FCC will hold 
 the non coordinated system responsible to eliminate the repeater interference

Correct, provided that the uncoordinated system never attempted to obtain 
coordination.  However, in this case it appears that Dave did attempt to 
communicate with the coordinator  the coordinator dropped the ball.  In 
that case the FCC will likely not get involved.

Bob NO6B




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Spectra time-bomb caps.

2007-01-21 Thread no6b
At 1/19/2007 21:13, you wrote:
Steve,

I would recommend that you NOT use the Tantalum caps. They have a very nasty
habit of shorting when they overheat in the summer. When this happens
depending on where the cap is, you may cause a fire in the radio.

Not a pretty when this happens.

Charles Miller

Yup, I've seen this first-hand on the RFPA board of a Yaesu 
FTC-4625.  Funny thing was the pretty-colored flame was shooting out of the 
radio while it was powered off - I caught it walking back into the shop 
from the restroom.

Bob NO6B




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Adding Remote Base to a Repeater

2007-01-21 Thread no6b
At 1/20/2007 08:42, you wrote:
Hi all,

I've been working on this problem for a while and have not come up
with any good solutions. So I'm hoping to find someone that has been
there, done that with some suggestions.

The issue is that I want to add a same-band remote base to an
existing repeater. The main problem is that the remote base is a
transceiver and I can't find a way to provide proper isolation
to/from the repeater.

Here are the frequencies, but it looks like it really doesn't matter
all that much. The repeater transmits on 443.300, receives on
443.800. We're using a typical UHF pass-reject duplexer with about 70
db of isolation between those two freqs. The remote base will
transmit on 444.225 and receive on 449.225.

I can put two antennas on the tower, but my horizontal space will be
less than 20 feet.

That's not going to help much unless you use a Yagi for the rmt. base 
antenna  put the side null into the rptr. ant.  You really need vertical 
isolation.


If the remote base had a separate tx and rx, then a band pass can
with a notch can (on the repeater freqs) on each side would probably
work fine.

Anyone have a good solution?

A friend of mine actually brought the RX input of a Kenwood TM-241 out 
separately so it could be connected to a community RX antenna some 60 ft. 
away from the 2 meter repeater TX antennas.  We were also able to add an 
isolator to the TX (to be a good neighbor)  filters  pads to the RX line 
until the IMD dropped to minimal levels.  The 241 has rather poor dynamic 
range.

Bob NO6B




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Reverse Burst Comments (Com Spec RB-1)

2007-01-21 Thread no6b
At 1/19/2007 18:25, you wrote:
Actually, the electronic CTCSS decoders react about the same as the old
reeds. The physics of the matter causes the filters that can discern
for instance - 100 Hz from 97 Hz or 103 Hz to be very narrow, and they
ring - even when the driving tone is removed. By reversing the tone
phase for a short period of time, the energy in the filter is driven to
zero very quickly, and if the tone is removed from the decoder input at
the right time, the tone decoder closes very quickly, and you get very
short squelch bursts at the end of a transmission.

I was never able to get a ComSpec TS-32 decoder to respond to reverse burst 
of any kind.

Bob NO6B




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Celwave Preselector Tuning

2007-01-21 Thread no6b
At 1/21/2007 11:14, you wrote:
  There are 7 stubs, 4 are on the pass cans, 3 in-between the 4
  resonators. Adjusting any of the 3 stubs (between each of the 4
  resonators) has little effect on the skirt.

The between adjust the size of the aperature (coupling) between filters.
You won't find a whole lot of change in the passband response as you adjust
them; that's just the way they are (or at least on the few dozen or so of
those that I've tuned).

 --- Jeff


I have 3 of the 5 section Celwave UHF preselectors (5 passband tuning adj. 
+ 4 aperture).  I found that the aperture tuning had a small but definite 
effect on the passband, but as Jeff notes it's not dramatic at 
all.  Perhaps they're really more for minimizing passband ripple.

Bob NO6B