Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 6mtr duplexer

2006-03-16 Thread Bruce Forestal
Al,

Using 3 1/8 Heliax is approaching the proper length to diameter  
ratio for optimum Q which should provide a deeper notch and increase  
the total isolation.  It may even be enough to eliminate one cavity  
per leg.  All of the designs I've seen use the foam type, I doubt the  
air line insulator supports will provide enough mechanical stability.

Bruce, WB6ARE

On Mar 16, 2006, at 7:31 AM, Al Wolfe wrote:

 Most of the discussion I've seen for the 6 meter Heliax  
 duplexer has
 been centered around using 1 5/8 Heliax. Has anyone used 3 1/8  
 stuff?
 Would there be any advantage to using the larger size? I have some
 available.

 Has anyone used the foam 1 5/8 instead of air line for a duplexer?

 Thanks,
 Al, K9SI








 Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Balloons to be tested as cell-tower Replacement...

2006-02-14 Thread Bruce Forestal
Good Day

Last October at the Armadillo Intertie Annual meeting I attended an  
excellent presentation and live demo by Space Data Corp.  The balloon  
was at about ninety thousand feet altitude somewhere east of Dallas  
and we talked with one of their engineers in Dallas via a 900 MHz HT  
from Austin, TX.   The DSP in the balloon was reprogrammed from it's  
normal data mode to repeat voice FM for the demo, running about 3  
watts on a low gain antenna.  The balloon payload weighs a maximum of  
6 pounds (per FAA), this includes the battery, TX/RX, a GPS to  
measure position in three dimensions, DSP and sand for ballast.   It  
takes 1-2 hours for ascent to 90k feet, a valve releases excess  
helium to stop the ascent and then releases sand to compensate for  
helium leakage and maintain the altitude for the typical 12 hours of  
usable time.  It takes 6 balloons to provide coverage and redundancy  
for all of Texas so in a 24 hour period some 12+ balloons are  
launched every day to ensure at least 6 are continuously at  
altitude.   Payloads cost ~$1500 each and can be reused about 10  
times, their recovery rate is around 90 percent and the payload sends  
it's GPS position back up to the balloons on orbit as they descend  
via parachute clear down to ground level.  Their primary use has been  
for vehicle tracking and data collection.

Space Data Corp has been doing this 7/24 for over two years for  
Texas.  This system is being evaluated for Mexican boarder patrol  
using something like seven balloons and also for military  
communications for all of Iraq.  It should be interesting to see how  
well this works for cellular.  These people are serious and know how  
to do this technology better than anyone else.   Some of them are  
hams too!

http://www.spacedata.net/

Bruce WB6ARE






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Balloons to be tested as cell-tower Replacement

2006-02-14 Thread Bruce Forestal
Good Day

Last October at the Armadillo Intertie Annual meeting I attended an  
excellent presentation and live demo by Space Data Corp.  The balloon  
was at about ninety thousand feet altitude somewhere east of Dallas  
and we talked with one of their engineers in Dallas via a 900 MHz HT  
from Austin, TX.   The DSP in the balloon was reprogrammed from it's  
normal data mode to repeat voice FM for the demo, running about 3  
watts on a low gain antenna.  The balloon payload weighs a maximum of  
6 pounds (per FAA), this includes the battery, TX/RX, a GPS to  
measure position in three dimensions, DSP and sand for ballast.   It  
takes 1-2 hours for ascent to 90k feet, a valve releases excess  
helium to stop the ascent and then releases sand to compensate for  
helium leakage and maintain the altitude for the typical 12 hours of  
usable time.  It takes 6 balloons to provide coverage and redundancy  
for all of Texas so in a 24 hour period some 12+ balloons are  
launched every day to ensure at least 6 are continuously at  
altitude.   Payloads cost ~$1500 each and can be reused about 10  
times, their recovery rate is around 90 percent and the payload sends  
it's GPS position back up to the balloons on orbit as they descend  
via parachute clear down to ground level.  Their primary use has been  
for vehicle tracking and data collection.

Space Data Corp has been doing this 7/24 for over two years for  
Texas.  This system is being evaluated for Mexican boarder patrol  
using something like seven balloons and also for military  
communications for all of Iraq.  It should be interesting to see how  
well this works for cellular.  These people are serious and know how  
to do this technology better than anyone else.   Some of them are  
hams too!

http://www.spacedata.net/

Bruce WB6ARE





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB224-E Data

2005-12-12 Thread Bruce Forestal


Doug,Thanks for the DB224E data, your document is outstanding and I appreciate your time spent getting the details in a PDF.Bruce WB6AREOn Dec 12, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Doug Zastrow wrote:To All I Promised this Info, My DB224-E sketch will be on its way to your inbox tonight.  If you don't have it by morning email me direct at dzastrow -at- qwest -dot- net. I'm also forwarding a copy to Mike Morris who several months back graciously offered to review it and post it to the Repeater Builder web site. It's quite ironic in that the antenna I documented went aloft to 310 ft. today.  It replaced an old DB224 which had developed a crackling noise when in duplex operation.  The culprit was a winch line burn going halfway through the phasing harness as well as a cracked dipole. (Pics below.) My apologies for the sketch delay.  I have been working 60-80 hour weeks the past three months and I put sleep ahead of completing the sketch.  Hope it fills everyone's needs.  Regards,  Doug Zastrow, WBØUPJElkhorn Valley ARCNorfolk, Nebraska  (Highly compressed and reduced picsas a courtesy to lo bandwidth users.)  Winch Line Burn 01c901c5ff92$18738860$6401a8c0   Dipole Crack 01ca01c5ff92$18738860$6401a8c0YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor Mobile PA Question

2005-08-16 Thread Bruce Forestal
John,

You should be able to get 100 watts or better... but it won't last  
very long.   Per Motorola's spec sheet the UHF mobile is rated at 35  
watts maximum for continuos duty which is what a repeater does.  The  
same ceramic PA sections are used in the Compa-Station but they are  
mounted on a heat sink that has one fifth the thermal resistance and  
they derate it to 75 watts output .  Even at 35 watts out you will  
need fans on the outside heat sink and blowing right on the ceramic  
substrates.   Micor PA's are well known for un-soldering their parts  
and generally not real reliable.You would be better off to  
totally bypass the four final PA transistors and use just the 45 watt  
PA driver stage.   It will draw much less current and generate less  
heat with just the driver as compared to running the final PA at 45  
watts.My thirty-two year old Micor mobile that was converted to a  
repeater twenty years ago was happy running 35 watts with fans until  
a recent lightning hit.  It's repairable but I decided it had a good  
life replaced it with something more modern.  So once again I'm  
running hardware that some else though was junk.

Bruce WB6ARE


On Aug 16, 2005, at 7:18 PM, John wrote:

 Hello group.  I have just duplexed a 100 watt 450-470 Micor Mobile.
 Next I installed the crystal for 447.95 RX, with high side  
 injection to
 give me 442.95 TX.  The radio is now tuned up on frequency, but I am
 only getting about 65 watts output, max, at about 20 amps of current.
 I have double checked everything;  LLA output OK, tried a 2nd re-tuned
 circulator, tried driving the radio with a signal generator connected
 to the RX injection cable (to be sure that I was really tuned to the
 right harmonic).  Everything seems OK, so my question is how much  
 power
 should you be able to get out of a 100 watt Micor on 442.95 Mhz??
 Thanks for any info you can give.

 73, John, k9KA









 Yahoo! Groups Links













 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Manual for VHF Mostar

2003-11-26 Thread Bruce Forestal
I'm looking for a manual for a VHF Mostar, the display version is best
but the NVR version will work too.  I can pay via PayPal, cashiers
check.

Thanks in advance,

Bruce WB6ARE



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[Repeater-Builder] Wanted MIB schematic, Mostar Interface Box

2003-11-26 Thread Bruce Forestal
MIBs are almost non-existant these days.  Does anyone have a MIB
schematic they are willing to share?

Thanks in advance,

Bruce WB6ARE



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/