Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP - Photo collection: Name this PA !

2007-06-03 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
That is a Micor vintage 800 Mhz PA... Some of those stations used these to 
drive the Klystron final as well...


Bryon KØBSJ

At 05:41 PM 6/3/2007, you wrote:

In past postings and articles on repeater-builder I've referred to
"locals" and "local systems"... one of the locals that has helped
me on an article or two emailed me with a question and some
pictures...

Can anyone help identify this amplifier?

See the 9 photos at < http://www.repeater-builder/wa6ilq/name-that-pa>
Each one is about 460-480KB each
The first one may be all someone has to look at.

Thanks in advance...

Mike WA6ILQ

At 08:08 PM 06/02/07, you wrote:

I have a PA I acquired but have no idea what it is. It's 19" rack mount
and about 4 rack units high.   It uses N connectors for RF in/Out

Stamped on the heat sink is 64E82631N02 F

The input is TRN8852A uses a M9875 device
Next stage is a TRN8853A uses a M9876 device
Next stage is a TRN5268
Goes through a directional coupler? TRN8856A
Then it goes to another combiner, I'm sure it has a fancy name, the board 
number is 84D82462N01

Then it combines 2 modules, one is another TRN5268B the other is a TRN4939
Then a circulator? 42B82633N01-A
Then through a filter?
Then out the N connector.

Can you tell anything by this info?
Looking for band, and power levels of the various stages.
Knowing what Moto book it is covered in would be a blessing...
Thanks in advance.





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Service Monitors with D-Star

2007-04-24 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
OOp's

My bad

I realized it after I typed it.

Too many acronyms...

Bryon Jeffers KØBSJ


At 09:00 AM 4/24/2007, you wrote:
>Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ wrote:
> > Well I will agree with Nate on this one.. The crazy D-Star will only do
> > it's AMBE digital and will not pass analog voice...
> >
> > At least when using a Quantar/Quantro with P25 capability you can set 
> it up
> > with CAI (Clear Air Interface)/P25 IMBE and it will do either analog voice
> > or P25 digital. You can really piss off the guys running analog when you
> > key up in digital. On the other hand you can get some serious interest in
> > digital if they really want to play...
>
>FWIW-CAI stands for Common Air Interface. It's the term for the actual
>digital protocol that P25 uses. So when you say P25 CAI, you are saying
>that you are using the P25 over the air standard protocol.
>
>--
>Jim Barbour
>WD8CHL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Service Monitors with D-Star

2007-04-23 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Well I will agree with Nate on this one.. The crazy D-Star will only do 
it's AMBE digital and will not pass analog voice...

At least when using a Quantar/Quantro with P25 capability you can set it up 
with CAI (Clear Air Interface)/P25 IMBE and it will do either analog voice 
or P25 digital. You can really piss off the guys running analog when you 
key up in digital. On the other hand you can get some serious interest in 
digital if they really want to play...

Just my two cents

Bryon Jeffers KØBSJ



At 01:51 PM 4/23/2007, you wrote:
>On 4/23/07, Jim B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know about D-STar, since it's unique to Icom, but Aeroflex (was
> > IFR) has a couple of monitors that do P25, and one of those can also do
> > things like TETRA.
>
>Understand.  This is why I personally think using something like P25
>for Amateur use is better than D-Star, with their "pseudo-open"
>standard.  (Yes, the protocol is open, but no one else in the world
>cares... mostly... and don't build in the vocoder or the protocol in
>test gear, etc.)
>
> > General Dynamics has a couple as well, but they're a bit more bucks.
> > And I'm sure there's a couple more too.
>
>Yep... lots of gear out there for what public-safety is using, like
>always!  Ham manufacturers  trying to come up with their own protocols
>I think screws the people buying it, long-term.  If you can't find
>test gear for it ANYWHERE, why buy it?
>
>Icom's shooting themselves in the foot big-time with D-Star, and
>taking a lot of hams interested in digital comm down their wrong path
>too, in my not-so-humble opinion.  The power of money and marketing.
>
>P25 makes a lot more sense for a properly-engineered system... and
>even includes... wait for it... TALK GROUPS!  (Stupid D-Star... no
>talk groups.)
>
>Nate WY0X
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>





Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT:Bryon, KØBSJ

2007-03-30 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
OOps...

This was meant for Ken personally.

Sorry..

Bryon KØBSJ

At 04:20 PM 3/30/2007, you wrote:
>Ken,
>
>I found two UHF MSF5000 code-plug files. One is a stand-alone UHF repeater
>using PL and the other is a full duplex base using the MRTI for controller
>interface. As I find more code-plugs and other info I will send it to you...
>
>Files are attached
>
>Bryon KØBSJ
>
>
>
>At 02:13 PM 3/30/2007, you wrote:
> >Bryon
> >
> >I've written you twice now with no response but just received your
> >direct email which seems to indicate you never received 'em.
> >
> >So, can you give a me a call please cause it seems your spam filter
> >must be eating my emails!
> >
> >Ken
> >- 
> -
> >President and CTO - Arcom Communications
> >Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and accessories.
> >http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
> >Coming soon - the most advanced repeater controller EVER.
> >Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
> >we offer complete repeater packages!
> >AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
> >http://www.irlp.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>





Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT:Bryon, KØBSJ

2007-03-30 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Ken,

I found two UHF MSF5000 code-plug files. One is a stand-alone UHF repeater 
using PL and the other is a full duplex base using the MRTI for controller 
interface. As I find more code-plugs and other info I will send it to you...

Files are attached

Bryon KØBSJ



At 02:13 PM 3/30/2007, you wrote:
>Bryon
>
>I've written you twice now with no response but just received your
>direct email which seems to indicate you never received 'em.
>
>So, can you give a me a call please cause it seems your spam filter
>must be eating my emails!
>
>Ken
>--
>President and CTO - Arcom Communications
>Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and accessories.
>http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
>Coming soon - the most advanced repeater controller EVER.
>Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
>we offer complete repeater packages!
>AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
>http://www.irlp.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
0A0030304E3C331C1C01010016EB16ED000A0030304E3C331C1C0101001715171700234416E800333838435255303033392028800400317C0A16E916CF0216A30200018401841842317820FB0089019B0112033602870108BB0D7D2877005A4000
06000500040B00811A0E871632BD0183169301038019C01900B501C04C00169B1A8308D600B5C155A13195A13195A100A0C155A13195A13195A101E01701174E00
00
TTRC
5138064351000101001D283A4E59728AA8ABC8CDED005138064351000101001D283A4E59728AA8ABC8CDED0022ED175700333838435255303033392028800500320006001758175A175B0901753BC63BC6003E0137021F003E01000C21036575A70CF1
00026D001F100E36AD794A0E8E0175013701D2005D01D20C210010031B5D26C8001A00391A38D839E50F1E0202174C1758043F043F171F1720172117221723172417251726172717281729172A172B
172C172D172E0137172F173317371738173C174017421744174617471749174B001502090015010915040900150309000B0008000808000801C11B7B794A0290175C007C175DFF61FF
3838464E001C1C01010017141716003838464E001C1C01010017171719002E12171100333838435255303033392428800400313C0A171216F80216CC0200018401841842317820FB0089019B0112033602873CA50508BB0D7D2877005A4000
06000500040B00811A0EEDFFDAA6DF7AE6E4005AF85AF8871632BDCEA5632DCEA5018316BC01038019C01900B501C04C0016C4169C010315E3074B00B5AA15911A5591
1A55910080AA15911A55911A559101C01693172A1704FF
TTRC
423542000101001D283A4E59728AA8ABC8CDED00423542000101001D283A4E59728AA8ABC8CDED0022F1175700333838435255303033392428800500320006001758175A175B0901753BC63BC6003E0137021F003E01000C21036575A70CF1
00026D001F100E36AD794A0E8E0175013701D2005D01D20C210010031B5D26C8001A00391A38D839E50F1E0202174C1758043F043F171F1720172117221723172417251726172717281729172A172B
172C172D172E0137172F173317371738173C174017421744174617471749174B001502090015010915040900150309000B0008000808000801C11B7B794A0290175C007C175DFF61FF


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: INTERFACE FOR CAT CONTROLLER

2006-04-11 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
You can also use the MRTI connector and program the Quantar to give MRTI 
priority and be a base not a repeater. All signals are present on the DB25 
on the rear of the chassis. The other way is by using the 50 pin telco 
connector on the rear and having the "Wildcard" option installed which is 
on or part of the "Wireline Interface"board

Also as NJ902 says, if your are wanting to pass or do P25 you use the 
DIU3000 between the Quantar and the external controller...

Hope this helps...

Bryon K0BSJ


At 02:08 PM 4/11/2006, you wrote:
>--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "ANTHONY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO WIRE UP A CAT CONTROLLER TO A QUANTAR
>REAPEATER...
>_
>
>You cannot replace the Quantar's internal controller which is
>necessary for the station to operate, however, you can interface the
>Quantar to external devices such as a CAT controller.  That way you
>can get features that the Quantar does not have such as voice ID's,
>courtesy tones, announcements and so on.
>
>There is a tab in the Quantar service manual called "System
>Applications" that shows how to make the connections for PTT, COR, Rx
>and Tx audio.
>
>To do this, the Quantar must have a wireline interface board installed.
>
>This also presumes that you are talking about analog only operation.
>If you want to do P25 digital or mixed-mode operation, you will
>require a DIU3000 to host the interface to an axternal controller.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Rohn-Radian TA55?

2006-03-28 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
I am looking for a torque arm for 55G, part number is TA55. Anybody got one 
they are not using?

Please email direct.
k0bsj at hamrepeater dot com

Bryon K0BSJ







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola parts / help

2006-03-06 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Barry,

Check here:



Bryon K0BSJ



At 01:57 AM 3/6/2006, you wrote:
>  We have a 75 watt Motorola base unit built week 20  1988 with rx
>coverage 150 to 170 or so and are looking for a front end - part
>number TLD8272D3 I am told which is 142 to 150.8 , is there a "can
>kit" availible or can anyne help /point us in the right direction to
>make this machine go on the Ham bands
>  Thanks in advance
>  Barry
>  VK4 KGW
>  Logan West Radio Group
>  Brisbane
>  Australia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 375 Watt TLD5082 question?

2006-02-26 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Steve and the group,

The Micor had a power supply problem (low voltage ps) when it arrived. I 
fixed that problem and noticed it was low on output power, only putting out 
about 260 watts (only HA!).. I then re-tuned it on the original commercial 
frequency and it still made the same power. I then swapped out the tubes 
and re-tuned it and now big power... I then changed the exciter out for a 
ham band unit already tuned up and the driver PA made good power there as 
well but he final did not after several tuning attempts. The driver PA 
output is supposed to be set at 10 Watts according to the manual and that 
is what mine is set to. It made good power in the commercial at that drive 
so I see no need to overdrive the final...

Hope this helps...

Bryon K0BSJ


At 12:08 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote:
>Does the 40 Watt exciter make on frequency power?
>Was it working properly before you changed tubes and moved frequency?
>
>I used a Kenwood TKR720 to drive the PA on one of these for several
>years with the TKR running about 25 Watts.
>
>Steve
>NU5D
>
>
>On 2/22/06, Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a Micor 375 Watt station that has the TLD5082 high power PA. I have
> > a fresh set of tubes in the station and on a commercial frequency (156.???)
> > it makes good power, about 400 watts or so.. I have tried to get it to tune
> > up on a 147.??? ham frequency but to no avail. I have heard of these going
> > down with no problem but this one just won't do it. I of course checked MOL
> > to see if the needed parts were available to convert it to the ham band
> > (TLD5081) but they are NLA...
> >
> > Has anyone converted one of these to the ham band and if so what parts did
> > you change?
> >
> > According to the manual the grid tuning cap and some other assorted coils
> > are needed, but I would like to hear from someone that has made one of
> > these work in the ham band...
> >
> > Thanks for your time!
> >
> > Bryon K0BSJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>DE NU5D - Promote Amateur Radio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 375 Watt TLD5082 question?

2006-02-23 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Joe and the group,

I have a ham band exciter and a good 10 watts out of the driver PA, I just 
can't get more than 160 watts out of the final. My dip in the plate current 
is not so great and when I bring up the screen voltage the plate current 
flattens out and no more power is made. I got a little more out from the 
initial tune up by adjusting the antenna coupling but still 160 watts was 
the max...

I do know that 400 watts is excessive but I was tuning for max power but 
still staying under my plate current limit. I brought the screen voltage 
back down when on the commercial frequency and left it at 350 watts or so 
for quite a while. The power stayed rock solid and the PA looked clean on 
the analyzer.

Just wish it would go down a bit further without mods. Oh well I guess I 
will pull the plate line and see what can be done...

Bryon K0BSJ

At 12:13 PM 2/23/2006, you wrote:
>Byron, I have successfully moved a 375 watt station down to the 147
>region. Check that
>your exciter is putting out the required drive pwr  in the ham band.  It
>was a long time ago
>but I think I converted the exciter into the lower band by just
>replacing the components indicated
>in the parts list. (the parts list shows frequency sensitive
>components). I don't believe
>any conversion was necessary for the AMP but the conversion was done
>about 20 years ago.
>By the way, that's excessive power. We run ours well below half power by
>turning the screen
>control down.
>Good luck.  Joe
>
>
>Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ wrote:
>
> >I have a Micor 375 Watt station that has the TLD5082 high power PA. I have
> >a fresh set of tubes in the station and on a commercial frequency (156.???)
> >it makes good power, about 400 watts or so.. I have tried to get it to tune
> >up on a 147.??? ham frequency but to no avail. I have heard of these going
> >down with no problem but this one just won't do it. I of course checked MOL
> >to see if the needed parts were available to convert it to the ham band
> >(TLD5081) but they are NLA...
> >
> >Has anyone converted one of these to the ham band and if so what parts did
> >you change?
> >
> >According to the manual the grid tuning cap and some other assorted coils
> >are needed, but I would like to hear from someone that has made one of
> >these work in the ham band...
> >
> >Thanks for your time!
> >
> >Bryon K0BSJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Micor 375 Watt TLD5082 question?

2006-02-22 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
I have a Micor 375 Watt station that has the TLD5082 high power PA. I have 
a fresh set of tubes in the station and on a commercial frequency (156.???) 
it makes good power, about 400 watts or so.. I have tried to get it to tune 
up on a 147.??? ham frequency but to no avail. I have heard of these going 
down with no problem but this one just won't do it. I of course checked MOL 
to see if the needed parts were available to convert it to the ham band 
(TLD5081) but they are NLA...

Has anyone converted one of these to the ham band and if so what parts did 
you change?

According to the manual the grid tuning cap and some other assorted coils 
are needed, but I would like to hear from someone that has made one of 
these work in the ham band...

Thanks for your time!

Bryon K0BSJ






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Dupelxer wierdness

2006-02-06 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ




OOP's..
That should be 1.3dB not .3dB
Sorry
Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ

At 05:59 PM 2/6/2006, you wrote:
Tim,
First off lets go over some numbers...
38 watts = 45.8dB
16 watts = 42dB
So 38 into the duplexer and 16 out is roughly 3.8dB loss not
7.5dB...
I don't have a Motorola 2600 but I do have an IFR1500 and it doesn't
always measure RF power anywhere close to what my Bird watt meter
does...
According to Sinclair
<http://www.sinctech.com/catalog/series.aspx?id=343>
you should see no more than .8dB loss through the duplexer...
Your 28 watts which is 44.5 dB is showing about .3dB loss which seems a
little too good but is closer than 3.8dB loss
When I see that kind of power gain by tuning the duplexer with low TX
power going through it I usually associate it with the fact that when you
are tuning the duplexer on the bench you use two of the ports while
tuning and terminate the third with a 50 Ohm load. Your service monitor
should be fairly close to 50 Ohms as well. When hooked to the transmitter
and receiver they are usually not near as close to 50 Ohms as the test
equipment that you are using... I will say that usually you won't see
that much power to be gained by peaking the TX side under (low)
power  So maybe the transmitter output is not near as close to
being a perfect 50 Ohms...
I sometimes even use another set of test cables when things start looking
weird, just in case.
When you finish re-peaking the TX side under (low) power, always go back
and set/re-check the notches on the TX side as well
This is taken from my experience. YMMV..
Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ

At 05:19 PM 2/6/2006, you wrote:
I got a wierd problem going
on.
 
I have a 440 repeater with a Sinclair Q3220E duplexer.
 
I used my Motorola 2600 with the tracking generator to tune it.
 
Then I checked the power.  Power in was around 38 watts, and the
power out into the service monitor was around 16.  Or about -7.5 db
inserstion loss.
 
So then I just pulled the plungers under power ( I know it's a NO NO),
and got the output power up to 28 watts into the service monitor. 
Which brought the insertion loss down to -2.6.  Which is still too
high, but better.
 
Keep in mind the monitor is a selective watt meter, so its doubtfull that
I am measuring garbage.  The spectrum looks fine.
 
So, why when I peak it with the tracking generator, aren't I getting the
correct insertion loss or at least comparable to the power tuning
method?
 
--
-Tim 
theVAP.com 
 





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

 Visit your group
"Repeater-Builder"
on the web. 
  
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 







YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

 Visit your group
"Repeater-Builder"
on the web.
  
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 
















  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Dupelxer wierdness

2006-02-06 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ




Tim,
First off lets go over some numbers...
38 watts = 45.8dB
16 watts = 42dB
So 38 into the duplexer and 16 out is roughly 3.8dB loss not
7.5dB...
I don't have a Motorola 2600 but I do have an IFR1500 and it doesn't
always measure RF power anywhere close to what my Bird watt meter
does...
According to Sinclair
<http://www.sinctech.com/catalog/series.aspx?id=343>
you should see no more than .8dB loss through the duplexer...
Your 28 watts which is 44.5 dB is showing about .3dB loss which seems a
little too good but is closer than 3.8dB loss
When I see that kind of power gain by tuning the duplexer with low TX
power going through it I usually associate it with the fact that when you
are tuning the duplexer on the bench you use two of the ports while
tuning and terminate the third with a 50 Ohm load. Your service monitor
should be fairly close to 50 Ohms as well. When hooked to the transmitter
and receiver they are usually not near as close to 50 Ohms as the test
equipment that you are using... I will say that usually you won't see
that much power to be gained by peaking the TX side under (low)
power  So maybe the transmitter output is not near as close to
being a perfect 50 Ohms...
I sometimes even use another set of test cables when things start looking
weird, just in case.
When you finish re-peaking the TX side under (low) power, always go back
and set/re-check the notches on the TX side as well
This is taken from my experience. YMMV..
Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ

At 05:19 PM 2/6/2006, you wrote:
I got a wierd problem going
on.
 
I have a 440 repeater with a Sinclair Q3220E duplexer.
 
I used my Motorola 2600 with the tracking generator to tune it.
 
Then I checked the power.  Power in was around 38 watts, and the
power out into the service monitor was around 16.  Or about -7.5 db
inserstion loss.
 
So then I just pulled the plungers under power ( I know it's a NO NO),
and got the output power up to 28 watts into the service monitor. 
Which brought the insertion loss down to -2.6.  Which is still too
high, but better.
 
Keep in mind the monitor is a selective watt meter, so its doubtfull that
I am measuring garbage.  The spectrum looks fine.
 
So, why when I peak it with the tracking generator, aren't I getting the
correct insertion loss or at least comparable to the power tuning
method?
 
--
-Tim 
theVAP.com 
 





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

 Visit your group
"Repeater-Builder"
on the web.
  
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 
















  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










[Repeater-Builder] WANTED: Motrac B94MDB manual..

2006-01-02 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ

I have come across a real clean vintage Motorola Motrac Station 
B94MDB-3105A which I believe is capable of 275 Watts on UHF...

I am not wanting to revive the complete station, I just want to use the 
final PA and HV supply..

I have never messed with a Motrac high power station on UHF before so I am 
going to see how hard it would be to separate the HV section and the PA 
from the rest of the Motrac station. It is really unbelievable how clean 
this one is, no evidence of mice or any other outside pests..

Any help with a manual would be greatly appreciated.

Let me know how much and where to send the money.

Please email direct at  k0bsj at hamrepeater dot com

Bryon K0BSJ 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Question Motorola Quantar VHF ?

2005-07-23 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ




Here is the info on VHF...

Bryon K0BSJ


At 08:08 PM 7/23/2005, you wrote:
does any have the link to the
specs. on the Quantar repeaters?
thanks John

- Original Message - 
From: "ANTHONY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 4:19 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Question Motorola Quantar VHF ?

> Has anybody in this group play around with Motorola Quantar VHF

> Repeater  Like it and the performance of it ?   
Regards ANTHONY 
> W4NCR  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










[Repeater-Builder] FS - Eagle Return Loss Bridge kit

2004-12-14 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ

I have one Eagle Return Loss Bridge kit for sale. This is brand new, never 
used and complete..

The part number is BKI-1900.

It is supposed to go with an IFR-1900, it is good from 5 - 2000 MHz..

The kit has the following included:
1 RG-400 test cable (BNC to N male) labeled "IFR 1900 Antenna - Reflected" 
approximate length 24"
1 RG-400 test cable (N male to N male) labeled "IFR 1900 T/R - Source" 
approximate length 24"
1 RFT000NM1 Termination 0 Ohm (N male short)
1 RFT050NM2 Precision Termination 50 Ohm (N male load - DC-3000 MHz)
1 HPS103N Power Splitter (N female 2 port splitter - DC-3000 MHz)
1 PFA060N Attenuator (N male to N female 6 Db pad - DC-2000MHz)
1 PFA060B Attenuator (BNC name to BNC female 6 Db pad - DC-3000MHz)
1 RLB150x4 Return Loss Bridge (5-2000MHz)

Eagle's price for the kit is $935.00. 


I will take $450.00 for it. They ask $548.00 for just the bridge new...

I accept PayPal (verified) or USPS money order.
Pleas email me direct.

Bryon K0BSJ

k0bsj at hamrepeater dot com






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] FS - Eagle Return Loss Bridge kit

2004-12-14 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ

I have one Eagle Return Loss Bridge kit for sale. This is brand new, never 
used and complete..

The part number is BKI-1900.

It is supposed to go with an IFR-1900, it is good from 5 - 2000 MHz..

The kit has the following included:
1 RG-400 test cable (BNC to N male) labeled "IFR 1900 Antenna - Reflected" 
approximate length 24"
1 RG-400 test cable (N male to N male) labeled "IFR 1900 T/R - Source" 
approximate length 24"
1 RFT000NM1 Termination 0 Ohm (N male short)
1 RFT050NM2 Precision Termination 50 Ohm (N male load - DC-3000 MHz)
1 HPS103N Power Splitter (N female 2 port splitter - DC-3000 MHz)
1 PFA060N Attenuator (N male to N female 6 Db pad - DC-2000MHz)
1 PFA060B Attenuator (BNC name to BNC female 6 Db pad - DC-3000MHz)
1 RLB150x4 Return Loss Bridge (5-2000MHz)

Eagle's price for the kit is $935.00. 


I will take $450.00 for it. They ask $548.00 for just the bridge new...

I accept PayPal (verified) or USPS money order.
Pleas email me direct.

Bryon K0BSJ

k0bsj at hamrepeater dot com 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-31 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Just to add some information...

The upgrade to version 5 employs the Dallas Real Time Clock (DS1216) but it 
goes in the U31 socket not the U30 socket

The upgrade does nothing to U30 and re-uses U31 in it's same state only it 
goes into the Dallas socket.

Of course U34 is completely omitted and the new 27C011 goes in the U29 
socket...

I still wonder the function of U30?

Bryon K0BSJ

At 12:13 PM 8/30/2004, you wrote:
>Tedd:
>I have not been following this thread so I have no idea of the whole story 
>here. I was simply explaining the difference between the 6264 and the 2864.
>
>But, many years ago someone made a low profile socket for the 6216 and 
>6264 chips that had a built-in battery and blocking diode. To give your 
>CMOS RAM chips battery backed capability, you simply plugged this special 
>socket onto the existing socket on the PC board, then plugged in your CMOS 
>RAM chips.
>Could it be someone retrofitted this RC-96 with this mod ??
>
>Ron Rogers
>WW8RR
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tedd Doda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:00 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM
>
>
>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:38:08 -0400, Rogers, Ron wrote:
>
> >A 6264 is an 8K X 8 CMOS Static RAM..when you unplug it, it loses 
> all data.
> >The 2864 is an 8K X 8 CMOS EEPROM...does not lose data when unplugged.
>
>Hi Ron:
>
>Well that would make sense! My only question arises
>is how can the "base" data be loaded into the 6264
>if it looses it's data when unplugged? As the RC-96
>doesn't have any backup battery, how is the data saved?
>
>Cross-posted to the ACC list.
>
>
>
>Tedd Doda, VE3TJD
>
>Lazer Audio and Electronics
>Baden, Ontario, Canada
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-30 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Yes the controller boots fine and functions as it should...

Very strange the I see the 6264 blank as you do.


Maybe someone else will have some input on this?


Bryon K0BSJ

At 10:11 AM 8/30/2004, you wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:11:25 -0500, Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ wrote:
>
> >I attempted to get the binary info out of my U30
> >and found it was blank.
>
>Seems I'm having the same problem here as well
>Bryon. Does the controller boot normally with
>that eeprom in place?
>
> >I have verified that the eprom programmer works on all the other eproms I
> >check this weekend
>
>I'm starting to think that the 6264 is slightly
>different from a standard 2864, but the 2864
>works in it's place??
>
>This was a private email to me, so I hope you
>don't mind me sending it to the list Bryon.
>
>
>
>Tedd Doda, VE3TJD
>
>Lazer Audio and Electronics
>Baden, Ontario, Canada
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] FS - Andrew FSJ1RN-50B

2004-08-05 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
For those who are getting the email address chopped off...

k0bsj at hamrepeater.com


Bryon K0BSJ


At 09:30 AM 8/5/2004, you wrote:
>This is 1/4 inch superflex with a straight N male on one end and a 90
>degree N male on the other end. These cables are 16 Meters (52') in length
>and are pre-made by Andrews
>
>If you want pictures please email me direct. I am asking $20.00 each plus
>shipping, but the more you buy the cheaper they get (box of 9 for $130.00)
>
>Also note that this cable is fire retardant rated..
>
>Bryon K0BSJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] FS - Andrew FSJ1RN-50B

2004-08-05 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
This is 1/4 inch superflex with a straight N male on one end and a 90 
degree N male on the other end. These cables are 16 Meters (52') in length 
and are pre-made by Andrews

If you want pictures please email me direct. I am asking $20.00 each plus 
shipping, but the more you buy the cheaper they get (box of 9 for $130.00)

Also note that this cable is fire retardant rated..

Bryon K0BSJ







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coupling loops/probes

2004-08-03 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Your welcome

Bryon K0BSJ


At 05:46 PM 8/2/2004, you wrote:
>At 06:25 PM 8/2/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>
>You should have gone to Dayton.  
>
><---Yea but at least I've got the genuine M knobs! :-)
>
>Ken
>--
>President and CTO - Arcom Communications
>Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
>http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
>AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
>http://www.irlp.net
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSF5000 & external controller...

2004-06-15 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
If it is a true digital (CXB) then use this :

http://www.batlabs.com/arc/msf5kcat.pdf

He is using a CAT controller but the MRTI pinout is a good place to 
interface

Bryon K0BSJ

At 05:25 PM 6/14/2004, you wrote:
>Anyone know the best way to interface an external controller to a MSF5000
>digital repeater?
>
>Richard
>kq4kx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fan controller

2003-12-25 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
If you are in the mood to spice it up a bit, Maxim has some really neat fan 
controller IC's. Here is a link to one of many, this one is a stand-alone 
and easy to interface.

http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/ad/MAX6665-AD.pdf

Bryon K0BSJ

At 08:03 AM 12/25/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>At 04:04 AM 12/25/03, you wrote:
>
> >Also, don't forget simply using a controller that directly supports
> >fans:  . Simple doesn't
> >necessarily mean cheap. To some people, plug-n-play is the most simple
> >form. Not that these controllers are plug-n-play, but a relay circuit is
> >easy enough for most people. The timing is in the controller.
>If you purchase a controller, make sue you get one that has been
>tried,tested and reliable.
>Gene W7UVH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>To visit your group on the web, go to:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/