[Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000 220Mhz Repeater

2009-07-14 Thread na6df
And if anyone wants more of the ESP1000 units, I have 5 available *CHEAP*, but 
you gotta come  get em in auburn, ca. I figured at the very least, they have a 
nice switching supply, and a bunch of RF goodies in the rx  tx, like the 
brick/hybrid RF modules, etc. Appears to be the same RF stuff as the mobiles. 
One of mine does have the master oscillator in it.

73,

dave'
na6df


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, DCFluX dcf...@... wrote:

 Don't throw them out yet. I was working on a NBFM mod, but just moved
 and things are all shook up.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/files/FluX%20Research/SEA%20ESP1000%28M%29%2C%20ESP1100%28M%29%2C%20ESP-504/
 
 http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~timc/e/esp504222.html





[Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000

2005-05-12 Thread skipp025

You are on the right track.  20 watts is not 
really enough power.  Most of the 220 acsb 
systems I saw were poorly applied and built 
from plans made by people who appear to have 
never been in the field. 

When you get into a new technology, there is 
always strange issues to be dealt with. I had 
some Intek/Securicor technical files, which 
indicated to me they were not properly dealing 
with those issues. You can only hide so long 
behind a patch job. 

Something about customer support also comes 
into play.  

cheers,
skipp 

ps: There is still a system or two in operation 
up here in Nor-Cal. How many people are on it 
is another question... 

 Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm surprised-all of the 220 ACSB systems I've 
 seen had very poor coverage compared to 460 Mhz 
 FM rptrs at the same sites. They typically 
 had to put 100W amps on the base tx to even get 
 vaguely close. That's why most of the customers 
 left.
 
 -- 
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000

2005-05-06 Thread DCFluX
Here is the preliminary schematic.  Because the synth chip in the
radio uses +9 V for some reason, this will have to be a board with SMD
parts on it instead of a single chip.

The plan is for Channel 1 to start at 223.85 with 10kHz spacing and
channel 201 starts at 222.15 MHz.  There will be jumpers to select
wheather the board is in the RX or TX module so the 1.6MHz spacing is
observed, this may be changed though as the program could be written
so that it would look at the incoming data and know which side it was
in which would be better for mobiles and HTs anyway.

Also a jumper would select 5kHz spacing to allow tighter spacing with
20 channels in the ACSSB portion of the band from 222.15 - 222.25 /
223.75 - 223.85.  This would also extend into the normal FM portion
but not cover all of it.

Still searching for a repeater to experiment on to write the software
needed for the board to run. Let me know if anyone has one cheap.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
attachment: Synth Fooler.GIF

[Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000

2005-05-05 Thread skipp025
The conversion to FM or a change to the Amateur Range 
is not practical. They are ACSB repeaters and there 
are 2 types... depending on who's format you have. 

Using ACSB is anoter story... It works just killer 
with a 20 watt radio going many times the distance 
a similar power FM signal. 

The repeaters, format and power level work pretty 
well.  But you need to have support people and real 
customers to pay the bills.  There are just a few 
of the 220 systems still in operation out here on 
the west coast... Intek and Securicor went poof 
with an interesting technician story or two

When a lot of the ACSB 220 stuff came out of service, 
the matching Zetron 49 trunking controllers made
the Ebay Commercial Radio Sharks go crazy... only 
to find out the ACSB trunking controller was nothing 
like the FM mode 49 trunking controller.  That'll 
teach them to use their darn snipe programs... 

I have most of the surplus Antenna System/combiner 
Equipment for the Intek and Securicor systems 
pulled from the West Coast.   Anyone looking for 
a nice deal on a 220 - 225 MHz duplexer or 
cavities..? 

cheers, 
skipp 


 Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jeff,
 
 I have a working ESP1000 repeater, and I am convinced that it is not
worth
 the effort and expense it will take to convert it the 220 Amateur
band.
 The primary impediment to conversion is that the SEA ESP1000, and
all of
 the mobile and portable radios associated with it, operate on
companded AM
 single sideband.  I talked with an engineer at the company that now
markets
 SEA products, and he told me that the conversion to wider bandwidth
FM
 would involve a major redesign of both transmitter and receiver.  In
 addition, the synthesizers are blocked from being programmed out of
band.
 
 Perhaps the most practical action is to throw away the SEA
transmitter and
 receiver boards, and replace them with Hamtronics or Maggiore
modules.  At
 least, you'd be able to use the chassis and power supply.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 Jeff wrote:
 
  Has anyone here been able to take a SEA ESP1000 commercial 220
acsb
  repeater and mobile and retune to the amateur part of the spectrum
 
  There are a lot of these repeaters floating around and I have used
them
  for commercial applications and they have fantastic coverage and
I'm
  sure they would be great in the amateur band.
 
  Does anyone know
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000

2005-05-05 Thread DCFluX
Anyone have an extra one of these repeaters they are willing to
sacrafice for experimentation purposes?

Seeing as 4K00J3E is an aceptable emission in the ham bands it has
been decided to leave the modulation type the same (ACSSB).  This
would allow use of the surplus HT and mobile radios currently on the
market and it apears to have advantages over FM.

Taking a first glance at the schematic it looks to me that the best
angle of attack is a chip that will sit on the control pins for both
the RX and TX boards that will intercept the normal synthisizer
command and replace them with what ever the command was and add a 2
MHz off set to the channel with a jumper to add an additional 1.6 MHz
on top of that for use in the other side.

But I need some confirmations for this to work.  Can the transmitter
be freely assigned to channels 1-399 or is it stuck on 1 - 199?  This
is because I need approx 1.22 MHz of channels and I would only have
enough addresses for 1.00MHz if the transmitter can only get the 200
channels.

The concept would then be that transmit channel 1 = 222.0 MHz and each
channel incr would be 5kHz.  Receiver channel 1 would be 223.6.  This
would allow programing of the channels from the front panel instead of
burning a chip every time you QSYed the repeater.  And theoretically
it would allow the repeater to run trunked.

We could still get away with the 200 channels but the spacing would
have to increase to either 10 or 15kHz, which ever is standard in the
220 realm and that just wouldn't be as nice as the carrier is only
taking up 4K of bandwidth anyway,

Most of 220 is a mystery for me, so I would also like some information
on what the official band plan and channel spacings are.  Not a lot of
kids on the block have 220 anything.

On a related note,  I think that the idea I have for a cheap duplexer
for 2M wont work very good there as the spacing needs to be 800kHz
minimum for low insertion loss. so it should be cost effective for
220, where 1.6M is the split.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000

2005-05-05 Thread skipp025
Pay attention to what you buy.  The 220 stuff is 
found under SEA, Intek, Securico, Midland and LMR 
Linear Modulation brand names.  Again there 
are two ACSB formats in use and they do not 
talk to each other. 

I know of a group of people running around with 
surplus ACSB units on simplex/talk - around/ 
direct. They were not able to get the units up 
to the ham bands, but the mobiles will program 
and work simplex in the 220-221 range. 

About 2 years ago, you could have had the 
SEA Repeaters all day long for $50 from Ebay. 

skipp 

 DCFluX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anyone have an extra one of these repeaters they are willing to
 sacrafice for experimentation purposes?
 
 Seeing as 4K00J3E is an aceptable emission in the ham bands it has
 been decided to leave the modulation type the same (ACSSB).  This
 would allow use of the surplus HT and mobile radios currently on the
 market and it apears to have advantages over FM.
 
 Taking a first glance at the schematic it looks to me that the best
 angle of attack is a chip that will sit on the control pins for both
 the RX and TX boards that will intercept the normal synthisizer
 command and replace them with what ever the command was and add a 2
 MHz off set to the channel with a jumper to add an additional 1.6
MHz
 on top of that for use in the other side.
 
 But I need some confirmations for this to work.  Can the transmitter
 be freely assigned to channels 1-399 or is it stuck on 1 - 199? 
This
 is because I need approx 1.22 MHz of channels and I would only have
 enough addresses for 1.00MHz if the transmitter can only get the 200
 channels.
 
 The concept would then be that transmit channel 1 = 222.0 MHz and
each
 channel incr would be 5kHz.  Receiver channel 1 would be 223.6. 
This
 would allow programing of the channels from the front panel instead
of
 burning a chip every time you QSYed the repeater.  And theoretically
 it would allow the repeater to run trunked.
 
 We could still get away with the 200 channels but the spacing would
 have to increase to either 10 or 15kHz, which ever is standard in
the
 220 realm and that just wouldn't be as nice as the carrier is only
 taking up 4K of bandwidth anyway,
 
 Most of 220 is a mystery for me, so I would also like some
information
 on what the official band plan and channel spacings are.  Not a lot
of
 kids on the block have 220 anything.
 
 On a related note,  I think that the idea I have for a cheap
duplexer
 for 2M wont work very good there as the spacing needs to be 800kHz
 minimum for low insertion loss. so it should be cost effective for
 220, where 1.6M is the split.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: SEA ESP1000

2005-05-05 Thread DCFluX
What is the difference in the formats?  Pilot tone?

It looks like the SEA repeater is based on two mobile radios, so the
chip I am working on should be compatible with most of their
equipment, as long as it uses the MC145158 synthesizer.

I saw a repeater on there with a dutch auction, but I believe in buy
it now, to avoid the snipers.  I also think that $200+ is a little out
of the budget for experimentation.

I should also mention that I need the ESP1000M that has the 10.275MHz
reference oscillator/oven module built in.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/