[Repeater-Builder] Re: UHF duplexers and preamps

2007-12-28 Thread aceblaggard
Hi Guys,

Thanks for the replies on this, my curiousity about the pre amp is
based on my limited knowledge that you can't improve what you can't
already hear so I wasn't too sure how much benefit they actually give.
We are lucky in as much as our site has no other users and the nearest
UHF site is about 1/2 mile away with 410Mhz Tetra and TV. I had a
quick look on the Angle linear site for pre amps and notice they sell
complete duplexers as well, the spec looks excellent but I'm sure it
comes at a price! On this side of the pond there doesn't seem to be
much of a second hand market for commercial kit, for new stuff we've
got Procom, their website lists
http://www.profilant.net/uk/filter/13061800
which seems to BPBR and has more than adequate power handling, UK
repeaters are limited to a measly 25W ERP! I'll make some enquiries
about the Procom and meantime our groups technical guy has decided to
buy one of those Ebay items to see if it performs as stated with no
intention of using it on our repeater :)

Cheers

Paul



--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ---Hi Paul. First of all, the type of duplexer you're looking at is 
 a notch only type. Secondly, I find their claim of  75 dB isolation 
 and  1 dB insertion loss pretty comical. I'd go so far as to say 
 that claim is total BS. Even at your spacing of 7.5 mHz, I don't see 
 how the performance is anywhere near as good as they claim. You ca' 
 not fight the law of physics as Scotty would say.
 
 A notch-only type duplexer is usually adequate for lower power 
 repeaters in a low RF environment. I would certainly NEVER use one at 
 a radio site where other radios/repeaters reside as they do not offer 
 adequate out-of-band rejection nor even adequate in-band rejection.
 
 To further complicate things, adding a preamp would probably be a 
 complete disaster without adding additional filtering. I do agree 
 with Jed that AngleLinear makes most excellent preamps with just the 
 right amount of gain for a repeater preamp, whereas ones such as ARR 
 have WY too much gain. The purpose of a preamp in a repeater 
 (assuming your receiver is worth a damn in the first place) is to 
 overcome the loss of the duplexer and feedline. Too much gain opens 
 the door to all sorts of issues, not the least of which are desense 
 and front-end overloading. And again, using one with the typical 
 mobile duplexer will probably cause problems anyway.
 
 You can find good deals on used band-pass/band-reject UHF duplexers, 
 usually quite easily. My advice is to buy one of those and forget 
 about the mobile type.
 
 Ken




[Repeater-Builder] Re: UHF duplexers and preamps

2007-12-27 Thread skipp025
My turn... 

Hi Paul, 

 We are currently applying for a 7.6Mhz split UHF repeater here which
 means we will be able to do away with the old and lossy large cavity
 filters for our old 1.6Mhz split repeater and use a commercial unit.

Wow, kind of hard for some of us to imagine anything but the
standard 5MHz UHF Repeater Offsets found used in the US 440 
to 470 MHz range. No big deal really but I/we often wonder if 
the Amateur Radios you folks purchase easily program these splits 
as standard or if you have to program them in as what we call an 
odd split?

 We've already tried a loaned Procom duplexer and the results 
 are most promising with no TX desense or noise noted on the 
 RX and minimal loss of TX power. 

... which is what a duplexer is hopefully supposed to do for you. 

 As we now need to purchase a filter for ourselves I've
 come across these on Ebay, has anyone any experience of them?
 http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=160192454185

What I'm seeing is a picture of a common vhf flat-pack duplexer 
(also known as a mobile duplexer by many) set up as an auction to 
offer you to be able to select a UHF or VHF duplexer selection 
once you make high bidder at the auction close. In other words it's 
a rather generic auction listing. 

 Looking through the archives I can see some groups use pre amps on
 70cm repeaters, this isn't something we've considered before but
 presuming they fit between the RX and the duplexer how effective are
 they? 

A preamplifier can make a night and day difference in repeater 
coverage only if it's properly engineered (and installed) into 
a repeater system. The issue with adding an external preamplifier 
is properly protecting it from unwanted energy, which includes 
the transmitter, external (outside) signals and lightning. 

Yes, on a repeater the preamplifier normally installs in front of 
the receiver and the filter network in front of it, which may be 
a duplexer or pre-selector assembly. 

 If they are worth considering what make and model is favourite?

The question that always makes the repeater preamplifier people 
offer an answer regarding their one favorite manufacture. 

A number of people make pre-amplifiers and pre-amplifiers with 
built in/on integrated filters of various sizes. Brand names 
include Angle Linear, ARR, SSB Electronics, Hamtronics, Spectrum, 
Ramsey... yadda, yadda. 

The most popular repeater pre-amplifiers are probably sold by 
ARR and Angle Linear. I use many of both brands in various commercial 
and Amateur Radio systems around my end of California. 

http://www.advancedreceiver.com/page5.html 
or 
http://www.anglelinear.com/

Like everything else the addition of a pre-amplifier should be 
well thought out else or you'll cause yourself more grief than you 
thought possible... hence the reason asking for opinions here on 
the group is a good thing. 

Under the pre-amp description there are at least four major types 
available... so again more questions to the group will help you 
sort out a viable option for your system. 

Making a full circle we arrive back at the flat pack duplexer 
you see in that Ebay auction.  Normally that type of duplexer 
is not used stand-alone with an additional receiver pre-amplifier. 
There is simply not enough protection provided by that type duplexer 
operation. You would need to obtain a more conventional band-pass, 
band-reject type duplexer or include some type of quality band-pass 
filter in front of any added external pre-amplifier when using 
a flat-pack unit. 

OK, my fingers hurt... 

chow
skipp