Re: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?

2010-05-03 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Maybe a wrap or two of some copper flashing to shim?

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: "Jeff DePolo" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 6:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?


>> How about doing it without a reducer at all then?
>>
>> According to this the dielectric size of RG-8 is 0.285"
>> and LDF-1 is 0.29"
>>
>> Cant find the dimensions of the shield of RG-8 but it brings the size
>> of LDF-1 to 0.30" which should fit nicely inside a PL-259.
>
> Just calipered (is that a word?) a PL-259.  0.37" ID to the tips of the
> threads, so there will still be some play if you used it on LDF1 without a
> reducer.  I guess you could fudge it with a lot of solder, or use 
> something
> else to shim it up.
>
> --- Jeff WN3A
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2851 - Release Date: 05/03/10 
02:27:00



RE: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff DePolo
> How about doing it without a reducer at all then?
> 
> According to this the dielectric size of RG-8 is 0.285"
> and LDF-1 is 0.29"
> 
> Cant find the dimensions of the shield of RG-8 but it brings the size
> of LDF-1 to 0.30" which should fit nicely inside a PL-259.

Just calipered (is that a word?) a PL-259.  0.37" ID to the tips of the
threads, so there will still be some play if you used it on LDF1 without a
reducer.  I guess you could fudge it with a lot of solder, or use something
else to shim it up.

--- Jeff WN3A



Re: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?

2010-05-03 Thread DCFluX
Ahh, right you are. Thats one of those things that you never refere to
by the proper name around here.

How about doing it without a reducer at all then?

According to this the dielectric size of RG-8 is 0.285"
and LDF-1 is 0.29"

Cant find the dimensions of the shield of RG-8 but it brings the size
of LDF-1 to 0.30" which should fit nicely inside a PL-259.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Jeff DePolo  wrote:
>
> A UG-176 *is* a reducer for RG-8X.


RE: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff DePolo

A UG-176 *is* a reducer for RG-8X. 

> -Original Message-
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DCFluX
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 4:39 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?
> 
>   
> 
> Try the reducer meant for RG-8X.
> 
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Jeff DePolo 
> mailto:jd0%40broadsci.com> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have read that one can put plain low cost PL259 connectors
> >> on FSJ1-50A Andrew 1/4 inch suplerflex using a UG-176 reducer.
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> >> Can the same be done with the Andrew LDF1-50 1/4" hardline?
> >
> > Nope.  The OD of the shield is too big to fit into a UG-176 
> reducer.  FSJ1
> > is exactly a quarter inch OD without the jacket.  LDF1 is 
> 0.31".  A UG-176
> > reducer is designed to fit over RG8X, RG59, et al which are 
> typically 0.242"
> > OD.  You can usually coerce the reducer onto FSJ1, but 
> you'd have to drill
> > it out bigger to fit LDF1 into it.
> >
> >--- Jeff WN3A
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2842 - Release 
> Date: 05/03/10 02:27:00
> 
> 
> 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?

2010-05-03 Thread DCFluX
Try the reducer meant for RG-8X.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Jeff DePolo  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have read that one can put plain low cost PL259 connectors
>> on FSJ1-50A Andrew 1/4 inch suplerflex using a UG-176 reducer.
>
> Yep.
>
>> Can the same be done with the Andrew LDF1-50 1/4" hardline?
>
> Nope.  The OD of the shield is too big to fit into a UG-176 reducer.  FSJ1
> is exactly a quarter inch OD without the jacket.  LDF1 is 0.31".  A UG-176
> reducer is designed to fit over RG8X, RG59, et al which are typically 0.242"
> OD.  You can usually coerce the reducer onto FSJ1, but you'd have to drill
> it out bigger to fit LDF1 into it.
>
>                --- Jeff WN3A
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


RE: [Repeater-Builder] LDF1-50 with PL259 & UG-176 ?

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff DePolo
 
> Hi,
> 
> I have read that one can put plain low cost PL259 connectors 
> on FSJ1-50A Andrew 1/4 inch suplerflex using a UG-176 reducer.

Yep.
 
> Can the same be done with the Andrew LDF1-50 1/4" hardline?

Nope.  The OD of the shield is too big to fit into a UG-176 reducer.  FSJ1
is exactly a quarter inch OD without the jacket.  LDF1 is 0.31".  A UG-176
reducer is designed to fit over RG8X, RG59, et al which are typically 0.242"
OD.  You can usually coerce the reducer onto FSJ1, but you'd have to drill
it out bigger to fit LDF1 into it.

--- Jeff WN3A