Re: [Repeater-Builder] Linking Repeaters Remotely

2009-11-10 Thread Nate Duehr

On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Jerry wrote:

 There have been times when during events it would have been great if two 
 different repeaters had been linked. I've been kicking around the idea of a 
 portable repeater linker consisting of one VHF Radius, one UHF Radius, and a 
 RICK controller in the crossband mode. I've talked to the different repeater 
 owners and they have given me permission to give my idea a try.
 
 The 'linker' works great the first time. The receiver radio hears the output 
 of the first repeater and keys the transmitter radio which keys up the 
 repeater. The problem comes in when the transmitter unkeys. The receiver 
 radio hears the tail of the second repeater and keys up. When the second 
 machine drops, the transmitter radio hears the tail of it's repeater and keys 
 up. This continues FOREVER. 
 
 Does anyone have any ideas or additional logic I can add to solve this 
 problem?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jerry

Kinda.

First... the idea Matthew offered will work.  CTCSS on user signal received on 
both repeaters.  Kinda.

Problem: ID's.  The RICK isn't properly ID'ing the link transmitters.

Many of us have been down this path on the list.  It'll lead to an annoying 
discussion of Part 97 if we go too far down that road.  But you DO need to ID 
every transmitter.  'Nuff said.

Best way: Put a dedicated link TX/RX at each repeater site or some sort of VoIP 
linking on its own controller port.  In-band RF linking on the user input 
frequencies is a kludge at best.  It can double with users, and has other 
timing problems...

If you MUST link in-band, make the link margin (RF power) high enough that if 
the link doubles with someone, the LINK wins and captures the repeater receiver 
well enough that at least one of the transmissions can be heard by all...

---
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Linking Repeaters Remotely

2009-11-10 Thread Pointman
Make sure you Full PL BOTH tx and rxers. I have had great luck with this 
method. At least with the Motorolas I use as soon as the input signal is 
dropped, the no squelch tall...and therefore no constant keying.
de KM3W

--- On Tue, 11/10/09, Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com wrote:

From: Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Linking Repeaters Remotely
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 5:50 AM















 
 



  



  
  
  

On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Jerry wrote:



 There have been times when during events it would have been great if two 
 different repeaters had been linked. I've been kicking around the idea of a 
 portable repeater linker consisting of one VHF Radius, one UHF Radius, and a 
 RICK controller in the crossband mode. I've talked to the different repeater 
 owners and they have given me permission to give my idea a try.

 

 The 'linker' works great the first time. The receiver radio hears the output 
 of the first repeater and keys the transmitter radio which keys up the 
 repeater. The problem comes in when the transmitter unkeys. The receiver 
 radio hears the tail of the second repeater and keys up. When the second 
 machine drops, the transmitter radio hears the tail of it's repeater and keys 
 up. This continues FOREVER. 

 

 Does anyone have any ideas or additional logic I can add to solve this 
 problem?

 

 Thanks,

 

 Jerry



Kinda.



First... the idea Matthew offered will work.  CTCSS on user signal received on 
both repeaters.  Kinda.



Problem: ID's.  The RICK isn't properly ID'ing the link transmitters.



Many of us have been down this path on the list.  It'll lead to an annoying 
discussion of Part 97 if we go too far down that road.  But you DO need to ID 
every transmitter.  'Nuff said.



Best way: Put a dedicated link TX/RX at each repeater site or some sort of VoIP 
linking on its own controller port.  In-band RF linking on the user input 
frequencies is a kludge at best.  It can double with users, and has other 
timing problems...



If you MUST link in-band, make the link margin (RF power) high enough that if 
the link doubles with someone, the LINK wins and captures the repeater receiver 
well enough that at least one of the transmissions can be heard by all...



---

Nate Duehr, WY0X

n...@natetech. com






 





 



  











  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Linking Repeaters Remotely

2009-11-09 Thread Matthew Kaufman
Jerry wrote:
 There have been times when during events it would have been great if two 
 different repeaters had been linked.  I've been kicking around the idea of a 
 portable repeater linker consisting of one VHF Radius, one UHF Radius, and a 
 RICK controller in the crossband mode.  I've talked to the different repeater 
 owners and they have given me permission to give my idea a try.

 The 'linker' works great the first time.  The receiver radio hears the output 
 of the first repeater and keys the transmitter radio which keys up the 
 repeater.  The problem comes in when the transmitter unkeys.  The receiver 
 radio hears the tail of the second repeater and keys up.  When the second 
 machine drops, the transmitter radio hears the tail of it's repeater and keys 
 up.  This continues FOREVER.  

 Does anyone have any ideas or additional logic I can add to solve this 
 problem?
   
The repeaters in question need to be configured to transmit CTCSS *only* 
when carrier is present and not during the tail, as is often done when 
using on-channel RF links for IRLP.

Matthew Kaufman


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Linking Repeaters over Internet Help

2006-06-04 Thread Jim Brown


Hello Group,
I am completely new to VOIP, so I need some direction.  I have two
repeaters with remote base ports that I would like to tie together via
internet connection.  Can you direct me to a page or tell me where I
can get info on what equipment I need to tie audio and logic
connections into the PC, and what software I need?  Thanks, KC4FWC
  


A few questions are in order.  Are the computers co-located with the 
repeater controllers or is there a radio link from the repeater to the 
computer?  Is this an amateur system or commercial?

Which VOIP system are you considering using?  Echolink (amateur only) 
does not have, by itself, a method of tying two EchoLink nodes together 
permanently.  A companion program called Echotime will provide a 
permanent link that will automatically re-connect if it is disconnected 
for any reason.  IRLP can work as a permanent link if you want to run 
Linix on both computers.  I suspect a system like Skype could be 
configured to operate between two computers on a permanent link basis, 
but I am not familiar with that system.

I built a direct interface from EchoLink to an RC-210 controller a year 
ago and it has been in service since then with no problems.  I do not 
use one of the custom interface boards that are marketed for EchoLink 
and other VOIP systems, and find the DTMF decode works better in the 
sound card than out on the external board since you can control the 
audio frequency response in the sound card.  In your case, you may not 
want any control signaling at all into the VOIP system if you are not 
going to allow outside connects.

73 - Jim  W5ZIT




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Linking repeaters

2006-02-13 Thread Jim Cicirello
We have had a multiple repeater linking system for several years that has
worked flawlessly. The system is VHF (several VHF Repeaters) that is linked
together using a Hub Repeater. A friend Leon N2HLT, you can see his site on
the web by entering his call) has a UHF system that has about fifteen UHF
repeaters. You cannot tell the difference from one of his repeaters to the
other. In my case I have a 447X449 Hub Repeater. Each stand-alone repeater
has a simplex link that talks to the hub.
Picture the spokes of the wheel being the individual repeaters and the Hub
being the HUB REPEATER that ties them all together, you can see how seamless
this can be. My hub does NOT have a tail, as all the repeaters linked are
not mine. In the N2HLT system Leon owns all the repeaters so he sets each
individual repeater for no tail and has his Hub Repeater set with a tail,
thus all the repeaters come up and go down at the same time. It doesn't get
any better. Hope this helps.
73 JIM  KA2AJH  

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 8:12 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Linking repeaters

Hi guys .I am interested to find out the better ways to link multiple 
repeaters together.At the moment i am using for each link  2 data 
radios back to back on a site between the sites but this is a slow way 
to link 3 or 4 sites together using one repeater site as the central 
site with all the others feeding through it.One option i am looking at 
is to install one data radio on each of the outer sites fitted with  tx 
and rx the central site .It works ok from the outer site i am testing 
to the central site but i am a bit concerned about from the central 
site back to the outer sites without it looping .any sugestions 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/