Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer loss different with more power, Why?

2005-12-01 Thread Mathew Quaife



These are the 28-37-11E,  6" duplexers, 3 on each side with 85 dB Isolation per channel, rated at 400 Watts.  But if what one mentioned that it should be about 120 watts out, then I am not to far off.  As for the meter, I used a Yaesu YS-500 meter, that I have ran along a Bird 43 meter and specs were so close that I could not argue with it, but now I have a Bird 43 here to work with, so will run the test with that on Saturday.  As for the slug, I have the 250 watt slug that I will be using.  I'm going to make some changes in the cable's that goes from the amplifier to the duplexer and see if I notice any changes there.  Over all, the performance of the system had improved as to the reason I went after the duplexers.     For some strange reason one of the duplexers lost it's tunning, and started getting some decense.  And after the tunning process, the repeater now transmit's just about as far as it can receive, so
 back to more of a balanced system.  What was happening was I could hear users about 40 miles away, but they could only hear the repeater about 25 miles away, and got real noisy at that.  Maybe an s-unit or two, but very noisy.  Before I did anything to the duplexer's, it was running at about 90 watts, hardly enough to make such a differnce, but it did.     Mathew  skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  You guys are missing something... no one asked him what size cavities he's using. If they are the smaller TX/RX units... the reported lower power output values are probably normal when using the higher insertion loss settings with smaller cavities. cheers,skipp > "Jeff DePolo WN3A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>> > > The other thing
 All of the RF power being produced at > > the 200 watt > > level may not be on the operating frequency. Remember that a > > watt meter > > reads total power, not just the power on the repeater > > frequency. If the > > transmitter or PA or both are spurious or dirty to some > > degree, you may > > actually have less power (on your transmitter frequency) than > > you think, > > even though the power 'reads' higher. Since the duplexer provides > > filtering, the power leaving the duplexer may show less due to the > > removal of the spurious energy.> > > > Kevin Custer> > And to add to that, bear in mind that if you only have one wattmeterand you> use it to first measure the input power to the duplexer, and thendisconnect> it and move it to the output of the duplexer that you've changed the> electrical
 length of the cabling between the devices. Unlesseverything is> tuned and operating at exactly 50+j0, changing the effective lengthof any> of the cables is going to change the Z that the transmitter sees. To get> around this problem you have two options:> > 1. Make up a short patch cable with the same connectors as yourwattmeter,> and substitute it in place of the wattmeter to maintain a constant> electrical length when moving the wattmeter between devices in thesystem.> The cable must be the same electrical length as the wattmeter'seffective> electrical length. For something like a Bird 43, the length isknown (and> published by Bird) making this easy. For other wattmeters, particularly> non-thruline types, this becomes more difficult. > > 2. Use two wattmeters, calibrating the differences in readings by first> connecting the two back-to-back (preferably
 without an jumper cable).> Transmit through the wattmeters into a dummy load and record the forward> power readings of both wattmeters. Determine the error between thetwo in> dB. Then put the wattmeters into the system at their appropiratelocations,> determine the measured loss based on their readings, and thencorrect that> value by the difference you originally recorded.> > --- Jeff> > Jeff DePolo WN3A - [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Broadcast and Communications Consultant>Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
 to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/  
		 Yahoo! Personals 
Skip the bars and set-ups and start using Yahoo! Personals for free













  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer loss different with more power, Why?

2005-12-01 Thread Jeff DePolo WN3A

> 
> You guys are missing something... no one asked 
> him what size cavities he's using. If they are the 
> smaller TX/RX units...  the reported lower power 
> output values are probably normal when using the 
> higher insertion loss settings with smaller 
> cavities.  
> 
> cheers,
> skipp 

Maybe I misunderstood the original post, but I read it to mean that TX-RX
spec'ed the duplexer  for 2.2 dB insertion loss and he was trying to figure
out why his measurements weren't meeting spec.  I think his goal (and mine
would be the same) is to meet or beat the original specs when retuning it.
Or did I miss something?

--- Jeff





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/