Re: [Reproducible-builds] [R-B WEBSITE PATCH] native en_US speaker website tweaks
Daniel Kahn Gillmor: > index.html | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Thanks, it's now live! :) -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs
Hello reproducible build hackers! I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month and year inserted by rdtool into the man page. However, now it seems to be built reproducibly [2]. I am not sure the underlying issue has been really fixed, though: maybe the recent tests just did not change the month in the build date?!? Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool? Otherwise, what should be done? Please let me know. Thanks for your time and for your commendable effort in making Debian reproducibly built. N.B.: I am not subscribed to the reproducible-builds mailing list; please CC me on replies, thanks for your understanding. [1] https://reproducible.debian.net/history/apt-listbugs.html [2] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apt-listbugs.html [3] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rdtool -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpd6duXUZ5Pw.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs
[ following the Reply-To I won't add Francesco to the To/Cc ] On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the > > > case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool? > > Yes, you are right. This is something that should be fixed in rdtool, > > probably by adding support there for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [2]. > > OK, good, you were already aware of the issue. I added a note linking apt-listbugs to that rdtool issue. > Please do not hesitate to file a bug report against apt-listbugs, in > case there's anything I can change in apt-listbugs itself in order to > help. Thanks :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo
libxslt_1.1.28-2.1.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs
Hi Francesco, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it > was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month > and year inserted by rdtool into the man page. We already have an issue for rdtool [1]. And yes, it is hard to detect, as it only embeds month/year, which we currently don't vary. > However, now it seems to be built reproducibly [2]. > I am not sure the underlying issue has been really fixed, though: maybe > the recent tests just did not change the month in the build date?!? > > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the > case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool? > Otherwise, what should be done? Yes, you are right. This is something that should be fixed in rdtool, probably by adding support there for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [2]. When we are really varying the month in the future, we will probably see much more of those issues, which we now see only when two builds are happening by chance in a different month. Kind regards, Reiner [1]: https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_rdtool_issue.html [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Hi Francesco, Hi Reiner, thanks for your kind reply! > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the > > case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool? [...] > > Yes, you are right. This is something that should be fixed in rdtool, > probably by adding support there for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [2]. OK, good, you were already aware of the issue. Please do not hesitate to file a bug report against apt-listbugs, in case there's anything I can change in apt-listbugs itself in order to help. Bye! > [1]: > https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_rdtool_issue.html > [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ > -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpzM9eZuemrW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
