Re: Help to make bsh reproducible
On 19/09/17 12:36, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hey Jathan, > >> I just remember that after excuting grep -r php.tar.gz I edited the >> debian/rules file > > I'm certain I'm missing something (!) but I'm still not sure what > your grep is meant to find? Assuming you are finding no results, > what, exactly were you expecting to locate? :) > > > Best wishes, > Hi Lamby. Sorry for my delay. Regarding to your question, in apg I executed "grep -r php.tar.gz" to find the next content in debian/rules file: apg-2.2.3.dfsg.1$ grep -r php.tar.gz debian/rules: --mode=u=rwX,go=rX --sort=name | gzip --no-name > php.tar.gz debian/rules: install -D --mode=0644 php.tar.gz $(CURDIR)/debian/apg/usr/share/doc/apg/php.tar.gz debian/rules: rm php.tar.gz And because of that, I thought for bsh could be the same, but at seems it is a different situation: bsh-2.0b4$ grep -r php bsh-2.0b4$ grep -r php.tar.gz bsh-2.0b4$(nothing found about php.tar.gz in any file) I thought for all the timestamps in tarball issues I could do the same resolution steps as apg exactly, but obviously not since the explanations I have had asking in IRC and in the mailing list. -- Por favor evita enviarme adjuntos en formato de word o powerpoint, si quieres saber porque lee esto: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.es.html ¡Cámbiate a GNU/Linux! http://getgnulinux.org/es signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post
On 2017-09-24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Naturally, please let know if there are other things like this. > > What I was about, is that the sentence implies that what's *right after* > is all the changelog of the release, which is not right. > I've committed a change to the template, could you please check it out > whether it looks alright to you? It does appear to imply that all the following changes are actually in the released version, which I don't think is actually correct. For example, I don't think "--auto-build" was part of reprotest 0.7, even if it was committed in the same week 0.7 was released ... ideally there would be an automated way to distinguish between commits not included in the released version and those that are. Looking at: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/misc.git/tree/reports/bin/generate-draft.template?id=c1a30a0 I guess referencing the changelog helps, though who actually follows links? :) live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post
Hi Mattia, > I've committed a change to the template, could you please check it out > whether it looks alright to you? Looks fine to me :) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I already had to do something similar in e222b3a > > (To save others looking it up, this is refering to:) > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/commit/?id=e222b3a Actually looks like I copied the wrong id, sorry!! A more relevant commit to what I was I trying to highlight would be https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/commit/?id=fd352f9354851916b27fa13f2da07fd758aba953 The tracker link is better described as nitpicking maybe :) > Naturally, please let know if there are other things like this. What I was about, is that the sentence implies that what's *right after* is all the changelog of the release, which is not right. I've committed a change to the template, could you please check it out whether it looks alright to you? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post
Dear Mattia, > I already had to do something similar in e222b3a (To save others looking it up, this is refering to:) https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/commit/?id=e222b3a > [..] the point being, that sentence about diffoscope seems to imply > that's all that went into release, which ain't true. Thank you for raising this and so sorry we missed this in the past. I've added it to the template so it should not get missed in future. Naturally, please let know if there are other things like this. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post
Hi Chris! On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 126's blog post: > > https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/126/ I'm writing this here instead of committing directly, as I think it's something that would be better fixed in the template. I already had to do something similar in e222b3a and fd352f9 for example. The point being, that sentence about diffoscope seems to imply that's all that went into release, which ain't true. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Please review the draft for week 126's blog post
Hi all, Please review the draft for week 126's blog post: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/126/ Feel free to commit any changes directly to drafts/126.mdwn in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/ I am very happy to reword and/or rework prior to publishing. I intend to publish it no earlier than: https://time.is/compare/0800_26_Sep_2017_in_BST or $ date -d 'Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:00:00 +0100' Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
