Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs, take two
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:50:13 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > indeed possibly some temporary glitch, it's now marked as reproducible. > (holger rescheduled it) > > Thanks for notifying us :) Thanks to you all for your kind replies and for rescheduling the reproducibility test!:-) Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpCy2TtdBBSA.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs, take two
Hello reproducible build folks! I have recently encountered another reproducibility issue with apt-listbugs. You may remember me from the previous issue [1]. Now, after the latest upload to unstable, I noticed that apt-listbugs was not considered reproducible on armhf [2]. The log states: E: the second build failed, even though the first build was successful. I am not sure I understand who's to blame: is there anything in apt-listbugs that should be fixed? Could you please tell me what I should do? Should I just wait for the next attempt on armhf? Or is there anything wrong to be fixed? Please let me know. Thanks a lot for your time and for any help you may provide. N.B.: I am not subscribed to the reproducible-builds mailing list; please CC me on replies, thanks for your understanding. [1] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20151109/003866.html [2] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/apt-listbugs.html -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpSigv2GTJvU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs
Hello reproducible build hackers! I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month and year inserted by rdtool into the man page. However, now it seems to be built reproducibly [2]. I am not sure the underlying issue has been really fixed, though: maybe the recent tests just did not change the month in the build date?!? Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool? Otherwise, what should be done? Please let me know. Thanks for your time and for your commendable effort in making Debian reproducibly built. N.B.: I am not subscribed to the reproducible-builds mailing list; please CC me on replies, thanks for your understanding. [1] https://reproducible.debian.net/history/apt-listbugs.html [2] https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apt-listbugs.html [3] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rdtool -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpd6duXUZ5Pw.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Hi Francesco, Hi Reiner, thanks for your kind reply! > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the > > case, could you please file a bug report against rdtool? [...] > > Yes, you are right. This is something that should be fixed in rdtool, > probably by adding support there for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [2]. OK, good, you were already aware of the issue. Please do not hesitate to file a bug report against apt-listbugs, in case there's anything I can change in apt-listbugs itself in order to help. Bye! > [1]: > https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_rdtool_issue.html > [2]: https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ > -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpzM9eZuemrW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
