[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Dan Price wrote: > On Sat 12 Apr 2008 at 04:32PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 2:05 PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > > > > I'd like to make a second sponsor request for this. It's been 5 > > months since I've had any email contact with my sponsor. > > That seems slightly unfair since we spoke in person at dtrace.conf, > and I apologized (and attempted to explain the reasons for) my slow progress > on > this. You're right, I should have mentioned that detail initially, and I apologize for the oversight. Yes, we spoke about this at the conference, but given that you haven't had time to respond to my emails since then, I figured that you'd also be too busy to work on the putback. I'm certainly sympathetic to this, in light of the upcoming release, and I also realize that this putback isn't the highest priority item on the list. But if someone else is available to do this, I'd like to just be done with it. Thanks, Chad Mynhier
[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
On Mon 14 Apr 2008 at 12:45PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Dan Price wrote: > > On Sat 12 Apr 2008 at 04:32PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 2:05 PM, Chad Mynhier > > wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to make a second sponsor request for this. It's been 5 > > > months since I've had any email contact with my sponsor. > > > > That seems slightly unfair since we spoke in person at dtrace.conf, > > and I apologized (and attempted to explain the reasons for) my slow > > progress on > > this. > > You're right, I should have mentioned that detail initially, and I > apologize for the oversight. Yes, we spoke about this at the > conference, but given that you haven't had time to respond to my > emails since then, I figured that you'd also be too busy to work on > the putback. I'm certainly sympathetic to this, in light of the > upcoming release, and I also realize that this putback isn't the > highest priority item on the list. But if someone else is available > to do this, I'd like to just be done with it. I totally agree-- and will see if I can help you locate someone... -dp -- Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - dp at eng.sun.com - blogs.sun.com/dp
[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
On Sat 12 Apr 2008 at 04:32PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 2:05 PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > > I'd like to request a sponsor for > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4532599. This is a bit > > of an odd request given that RFE is marked "6-Fix Understood (Fix is > > known)". It appears that the responsible engineer has left Sun, > > though, so I don't know what state it's actually in. If possible, I'd > > like to adopt (or hijack, if you prefer) this RFE. > > I'd like to make a second sponsor request for this. It's been 5 > months since I've had any email contact with my sponsor. That seems slightly unfair since we spoke in person at dtrace.conf, and I apologized (and attempted to explain the reasons for) my slow progress on this. However, I agree that I'm overloaded with work on the May release at the moment; is someone else available to shepherd this in? We got the PSARC work done some time ago, so this should be straightforward. -dp -- Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - dp at eng.sun.com - blogs.sun.com/dp
[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
On Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 2:05 PM, Chad Mynhier wrote:
> I'd like to request a sponsor for
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4532599. This is a bit
> of an odd request given that RFE is marked "6-Fix Understood (Fix is
> known)". It appears that the responsible engineer has left Sun,
> though, so I don't know what state it's actually in. If possible, I'd
> like to adopt (or hijack, if you prefer) this RFE.
I'd like to make a second sponsor request for this. It's been 5
months since I've had any email contact with my sponsor.
Thanks,
Chad Mynhier
>
> I've posted a webrev for a solution here:
> http://interstel.net/~mynhier/4532599/. (Note that this webrev also
> includes the fix for
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6234106 ("ptime should
> report microseconds or nanoseconds instead of just milliseconds"), as
> it seems pointless to have microstate stats at a millisecond
> resolution.
>
> Thanks,
> Chad Mynhier
> OS0124
>
[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
On 10/4/07, Dan Price wrote: > On Thu 04 Oct 2007 at 02:05PM, Chad Mynhier wrote: > > I'd like to request a sponsor for > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4532599. This is a bit > > of an odd request given that RFE is marked "6-Fix Understood (Fix is > > known)". It appears that the responsible engineer has left Sun, > > though, so I don't know what state it's actually in. If possible, I'd > > like to adopt (or hijack, if you prefer) this RFE. > > > Chad, I'm a bit busy but this is an area of interest for me. > > I have a PSARC license and at least a passing familiarity with this > sort of code, so I can sponsor this if you wish. Can we collaborate > on this? Certainly. I'll follow up with you privately. Thanks, Chad
[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
I'd like to request a sponsor for
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4532599. This is a bit
of an odd request given that RFE is marked "6-Fix Understood (Fix is
known)". It appears that the responsible engineer has left Sun,
though, so I don't know what state it's actually in. If possible, I'd
like to adopt (or hijack, if you prefer) this RFE.
I've posted a webrev for a solution here:
http://interstel.net/~mynhier/4532599/. (Note that this webrev also
includes the fix for
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6234106 ("ptime should
report microseconds or nanoseconds instead of just milliseconds"), as
it seems pointless to have microstate stats at a millisecond
resolution.
Thanks,
Chad Mynhier
OS0124
[request-sponsor] 4532599: ptime should report resource usage statistics from /proc for running processes
On Thu 04 Oct 2007 at 02:05PM, Chad Mynhier wrote:
> I'd like to request a sponsor for
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4532599. This is a bit
> of an odd request given that RFE is marked "6-Fix Understood (Fix is
> known)". It appears that the responsible engineer has left Sun,
> though, so I don't know what state it's actually in. If possible, I'd
> like to adopt (or hijack, if you prefer) this RFE.
>
> I've posted a webrev for a solution here:
> http://interstel.net/~mynhier/4532599/. (Note that this webrev also
> includes the fix for
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6234106 ("ptime should
> report microseconds or nanoseconds instead of just milliseconds"), as
> it seems pointless to have microstate stats at a millisecond
> resolution.
Chad, I'm a bit busy but this is an area of interest for me.
I have a PSARC license and at least a passing familiarity with this
sort of code, so I can sponsor this if you wish. Can we collaborate
on this?
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - dp at eng.sun.com - blogs.sun.com/dp
