[request-sponsor] request-sponsor BUG ID(s) : 6649911,6578005

[Tim Haley]

I am now working with Vinay and Beeresh on this request.

-tim

Bonnie Corwin wrote:
> Note that I am only adding a request for 6578005 since the source for 
> printf is not available.
> 
> Bonnie
> 
> vinay simha wrote:
>>   name1  : Vinay Simha.B.N
>>   email id: simhavcs at gmail.com  
>>   name2  :  Beeresh.G
>>   email-id: beeresh at gmail.com  
>>  
>>   Bug ID Number :* 6649911* 
>>   synopsis:/usr/bin/printf should support field width or precision 
>> format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
>>   category :  utility
>>   subcategory : shell
>>   description : /usr/bin/printf should be able to use field with or 
>> precision format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
>>
>>   Bug ID Number :* 6578005* 
>>   synopsis: log and logs words can cause confusion
>>   category :  utility
>>   subcategory : zfs
>>   description : The command for adding a log device to a zpool uses the 
>> keyword "log"  However, the output of zpool status shows "logs"  This 
>> may cause a bit of confusion.
>>  
>>
>>
>>   tentative date: *  12-Feb-2008 *
>>  
>>   sca number(s):   *OS0227,OS0225 *
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vinay Simha.B.N.
>> #9986985831

[request-sponsor] request-sponsor BUG ID(s) : 6649911,6578005

[Bonnie Corwin]

Note that I am only adding a request for 6578005 since the source for 
printf is not available.

Bonnie

vinay simha wrote:
>   name1  : Vinay Simha.B.N
>   email id: simhavcs at gmail.com  
>   name2  :  Beeresh.G
>   email-id: beeresh at gmail.com  
>  
>   Bug ID Number :* 6649911* 
>   synopsis:/usr/bin/printf should support field width or precision 
> format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
>   category :  utility
>   subcategory : shell
>   description : /usr/bin/printf should be able to use field with or 
> precision format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
> 
>   Bug ID Number :* 6578005* 
>   synopsis: log and logs words can cause confusion
>   category :  utility
>   subcategory : zfs
>   description : The command for adding a log device to a zpool uses the 
> keyword "log"  However, the output of zpool status shows "logs"  This 
> may cause a bit of confusion.
>  
> 
> 
>   tentative date: *  12-Feb-2008 *
>  
>   sca number(s):   *OS0227,OS0225 *
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Vinay Simha.B.N.
> #9986985831
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> request-sponsor mailing list
> request-sponsor at opensolaris.org

[request-sponsor] request-sponsor BUG ID(s) : 6649911,6578005

[vinay simha]

  name1  : Vinay Simha.B.N
  email id: simhavcs at gmail.com
  name2  :  Beeresh.G
  email-id: beeresh at gmail.com

  Bug ID Number :* 6649911*
  synopsis:/usr/bin/printf should support field width or precision format
specifiers like %*d or %0*d
  category :  utility
  subcategory : shell
  description : /usr/bin/printf should be able to use field with or
precision format specifiers like %*d or %0*d

  Bug ID Number :* 6578005*
  synopsis: log and logs words can cause confusion
  category :  utility
  subcategory : zfs
  description : The command for adding a log device to a zpool uses the
keyword "log"  However, the output of zpool status shows "logs"  This may
cause a bit of confusion.



  tentative date: *  12-Feb-2008 *

  sca number(s):   *OS0227,OS0225 *

-- 
Regards,

Vinay Simha.B.N.
#9986985831
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[request-sponsor] request-sponsor BUG ID(s) : 6649911,6578005

[Roland Mainz]

"Dana H. Myers" wrote:
> vinay simha wrote:
> >   Bug ID Number :* 6649911*
> >   synopsis:/usr/bin/printf should support field width or precision
> > format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
> >   category :  utility
> >   subcategory : shell
> >   description : /usr/bin/printf should be able to use field with or
> > precision format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
> 
> I believe the source code to /usr/bin/printf is one of the small number
> of files
> from Solaris that are not available in OpenSolaris - do you already have
> a proposed
> fix for this?

Erm... I already have a replacement for the current /usr/bin/printf
codebase ready (e.g. the code itself is already finished) which covers
CR #6649911 and almost all of the other outstanding RFEs and bug reports
for /usr/bin/printf ... right now we're waiting for the ARC case being
started (see
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/2007-December/005831.html
for the draft).



Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

[request-sponsor] request-sponsor BUG ID(s) : 6649911,6578005

[Roland Mainz]

vinay simha wrote:
> 
>   name1  : Vinay Simha.B.N
>   email id: simhavcs at gmail.com
>   name2  :  Beeresh.G
>   email-id: beeresh at gmail.com
> 
>   Bug ID Number : 6649911
>   synopsis:/usr/bin/printf should support field width or precision
> format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
>   category :  utility
>   subcategory : shell
>   description : /usr/bin/printf should be able to use field with or
> precision format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
[snip]

/usr/bin/printf is currently closed-source, however we're working on a
replacement codebase which will be completely opensource and will cover
this CR# (and most of the other RFEs for /usr/bin/printf), too - see
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/2007-December/005831.html
for the matching ARC case draft.

Technically the only thing I forgot was to ask for a sponsor for this CR
... ;-(



Bye,
Roland 
 
-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

[request-sponsor] request-sponsor BUG ID(s) : 6649911,6578005

[Dana H. Myers]

vinay simha wrote:
>
>   Bug ID Number :* 6649911* 
>   synopsis:/usr/bin/printf should support field width or precision 
> format specifiers like %*d or %0*d
>   category :  utility
>   subcategory : shell
>   description : /usr/bin/printf should be able to use field with or 
> precision format specifiers like %*d or %0*d

I believe the source code to /usr/bin/printf is one of the small number 
of files
from Solaris that are not available in OpenSolaris - do you already have 
a proposed
fix for this?

Dana