Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review
*bump bump* Anyone? Still haven't figured out how to get a local change to the py scripts to reflect correctly in the running copy. On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:58 AM, fireworm firewor...@gmail.com wrote: *bump* Anyone have any ideas? On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:53:46 AM UTC-7, fireworm wrote: Removed the pyc file (review_request.pyc). Set myself as the owner (not www-data or admin or whatever). Restarted apache. Refreshed the review webpage. Page loaded just fine, no pyc next to review_request.py. Seems super suspicious. On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:47:41 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Yeah, it does sound like it’s not executing. Try removing the .pyc file, just to check. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On June 26, 2014 at 10:12:41 AM, fireworm (firew...@gmail.com) wrote: Ok, adding garbage text to the python is not causing the server to go down, I'm thinking my updates aren't taking effect. More sanity checking: I don't have any of the developer code installed and am modifying the install itself, right? I don't need to update an executable somewhere forcibly? The folder which I'm updating the python is in: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1- py2.7.egg/reviewboard I see the pyc get updated, but again, it just runs happily, which seems very suspicious to me. I even put logging in webapi/resources/review_request.py, in _find_user(), which didn't update. Does any of this make sense? On Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:46:30 AM UTC-7, fireworm wrote: ...I get the feeling my changes to the python are somehow not being actually run. Is there a place I can put a logging.debug() call that absolutely gets hit 100% of the time to make sure i can see it? On Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:19:22 AM UTC-7, fireworm wrote: Local Site: Not that I'm aware. (I don't know what it is...) Yep, Authentication Settings are Active Directory. (New Users can login via AD just fine.) On Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:49:57 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hmm, it should be called under those conditions. Just to check, are you using the Local Sites feature? (If you don’t know what that is, then no.) Can you also just verify in Authentication Settings that it’s Active Directory and not LDAP? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On June 25, 2014 at 9:21:24 AM, fireworm (firew...@gmail.com) wrote: Christian: Open an existing review open in the RB website. Click the pencil under 'People' (which brings up a text box that is empty (no one is currently on the review)). Type in a name in our domain that doesn't have an account yet. (Other accounts show up in the 'intellisense'.) Hit Enter. Message in red says User 'the name I typed in' does not exist. Bruce: Yes, looking at the server log I even see other logs at DEBUG and INFO level. 18:08:32 WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/http/response.py:327: DeprecationWarning: Using mimetype keyword argument is deprecated, use content_type instead super(HttpResponse, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) 18:52:28 DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Beginning parse of diff, size = 16150 On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 7:41:39 AM UTC-7, Bruce Cran wrote: Have you bumped the logging level to DEBUG in the admin settings? -- Bruce On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:02 PM, fireworm firew...@gmail.com wrote: I modified the one in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/ dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/backend.py Then I restarted Apache, and reloaded the page, and tried to add a user who doesn't have an RB account. (I see an updated pyc in that folder as well) But I don't see anything in reviewboard.log or the apache error.log. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit
Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review
Do you also need to restart memcached? -- Bruce On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jason Batchkoff firewor...@gmail.com wrote: *bump bump* Anyone? Still haven't figured out how to get a local change to the py scripts to reflect correctly in the running copy. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Formatting errors in description field
Can you show what the source markdown looks like? (Click the pencil and then copy/paste/redact) -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Philip Schiffer philip.schif...@sprylab.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have upgraded our reviewboard installation from 1.7.x to 2.0.3. Unfortunately we have some issues with the formatting of the description field. We are using the post-review tool in our scripts to post our reviews. Inside the description field we put the git commit log entries. As you can see in the attachment, there are problems displaying the links. I've searched the bug tracker but unfortunately I'm getting http 500 errors from google code for this issue: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3377 -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Unable to installing Extensions on RB 2.0.3
I am getting the same errors as MoonWalker. On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:29:14 PM UTC-5, MoonWalker wrote: I am using RB 2.0.3 and I tried to install the following extensions but seems like they are not available (easy_install is not able to find them) , am I missing something here? https://www.reviewboard.org/store/products/6/ https://www.reviewboard.org/store/products/2/ -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Adding a new diff to existent review Loops on loading
Can you use the Network tab to find the contents of the response (the one returning HTTP 400)? -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:44 PM, MoonWalker daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com wrote: sorry, this is the full one 1. POST http://codereview.devneta.local/api/review-requests/559/diffs/ 400 (BAD REQUEST) jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 1. sendjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 2. p.extend.ajaxjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 3. fileUploadXhr3rdparty.min.js:4 4. $.fn.ajaxSubmit3rdparty.min.js:4 5. doCallbase.min.js:1 6. nextjquery.gravy.min.js:1 7. startjquery.gravy.min.js:1 8. RB.apiCallbase.min.js:1 9. Backbone.ajaxbase.min.js:1 10. a.sync3rdparty.min.js:4 11. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.syncbase.min.js:1 12. h.extend.save3rdparty.min.js:3 13. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend._saveObjectbase.min.js:1 14. ready.readybase.min.js:1 15. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.readybase.min.js:1 16. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.ensureCreatedbase.min.js:1 17. ready.readybase.min.js:1 18. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.readybase.min.js:1 19. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.readybase.min.js:1 20. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.savebase.min.js:1 21. sendbase.min.js:1 22. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 23. p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 24. g.handle.hjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 25. p.event.triggerjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 26. (anonymous function)jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 27. p.extend.eachjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 28. p.fn.p.eachjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 29. p.fn.extend.triggerjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 30. p.fn.(anonymous function)jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 31. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 32. p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 33. g.handle.hjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'msg' of undefined base.min.js:1 1. displayErrorsbase.min.js:1 2. options.dataStoreObject.save.errorbase.min.js:1 3. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 4. e.error3rdparty.min.js:4 5. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 6. kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 7. l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 8. yjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 9. d On Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:42:21 PM UTC+10, MoonWalker wrote: I noticed this issue several times, and I enabled all the logs and some how there is zero information on them about this issue. I enabled JavaScript console in my browser (chrome latest version under Windows 7) and this is what I get. 1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'msg' of undefined base.min.js:1 1. displayErrorsbase.min.js:1 2. options.dataStoreObject.save.errorbase.min.js:1 3. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 4. e.error3rdparty.min.js:4 5. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 6. kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 7. l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 8. yjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 9. d 2. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review
You probably need to delete the .pyc file and reload the web server. -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Cran bruce.c...@gmail.com wrote: Do you also need to restart memcached? -- Bruce On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jason Batchkoff firewor...@gmail.com wrote: *bump bump* Anyone? Still haven't figured out how to get a local change to the py scripts to reflect correctly in the running copy. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request
Can you try running 'svn up' and retrying the 'rbt post' command? SVN
sometimes has issues with partially-synced trees after certain types of
operations.
-David
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Shahadat Hossain s.hossain1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Concern,
I am using Reviewboard server 1.7.26 and RBTtools 0.5.7 for creating
review-request in reviewboard server with post-review support.But i am
currently having problem while creating diff on files in reviewboard
server. Please check the below log while creating the diff in reviewboard
server.
post-review --debug
The post-review tool is deprecated in favor of therbt suite of
commands. post-review will go away in RBTools 0.6.x.
RBTools 0.5.7
Python 2.7.3 (default, Feb 27 2014, 20:00:17)
[GCC 4.6.3]
Running on Linux-3.2.0-65-generic-pae-i686-with-Ubuntu-12.04-precise
Home = /home/sbrc
Current Directory = /home/sbrc/svn/new/newRepository/newRepo
Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path:
https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain.com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports
changesets: False
Finished checking the repository type.
HTTP GETting api/info/
DEBUG:root:Running: svn st
DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
HTTP GETting api/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/info/
Using the new web API
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/1/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/1/info/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/2/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/2/info/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/3/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/3/info/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/4/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/4/info/
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path:
https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain.com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports
changesets: False
Attempting to create review request on svn for None
HTTP POSTing to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/:
{'repository': 'svn'}
Review request created
Uploading diff, size: 764
HTTP POSTing to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/82/diffs/:
{'basedir': '/'}
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'file': u'/postreview.py', u'err':
{u'msg': u'The file was not found in the repository', u'code': 207},
u'revision': u'4'}
Error uploading diff
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to stop new reviews being created on 1.6.16 from RBTools?
Stephen, There's no good way to do this short of going in and modifying the code. Is there a reason that you're not just migrating everything over to the new server? -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Stephen srma...@gmail.com wrote: I'm in the middle of switching over to a new ReviewBoard server instance and I would like at some future point to prevent existing users from creating new reviews on the old RB instance. I'd like the active reviews on the old RB instance to continue to be accessed so they can be finalised and closed in due course. Is there a way to disable the web API RBTools uses? I'd also like the New review link/page to also not function. Any suggestions on how best to achieve this? Cheers, Stephen. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review
That's pretty mysterious. Are you sure that the logging you added is in the correct places? -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:01 PM, fireworm firewor...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, that's what I did. But it refuses to acknowledge I changed the actual execution logic... Or it's just super smart? For reference, here's what I'm doing: $ sudo chown -R [me] /usr/locla/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/reviewboard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/ [delete review_request.pyc and backends.pyc] $ sudo chown -R www-data /usr/locla/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/reviewboard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/ $ sudo service apache2 restart $ sudo service memcached restart [reload webpage, try to add a user to the review] [see that both request_review.pyc and backends.pyc are updated] $ cat /bar/www/[rbsite]/logs/reviewboard.log [no prints in there from my new logging.debug()] $ sudo cat /var/log/apache2/error.log [no prints in there from 'bad python code'] I think I'm going insane... I've even just restarted the computer itself too, but that doesn't do anything either... On Thursday, July 17, 2014 1:49:48 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: You probably need to delete the .pyc file and reload the web server. -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Cran bruce...@gmail.com wrote: Do you also need to restart memcached? -- Bruce On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jason Batchkoff firew...@gmail.com wrote: *bump bump* Anyone? Still haven't figured out how to get a local change to the py scripts to reflect correctly in the running copy. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: SCMError: OPTIONS of 'http://IP_ADDR:PORT/svn': could not connect to server (http://IP_ADDR:PORT)
It turns out that my Review Board VM didn't like the SSL certificate of my SVN VM. Once I resolved that, everything worked as expected. To answer your question, no, there was no proxy involved. Thanks for responding! --Jamie On Monday, June 16, 2014 11:52:02 AM UTC-4, Jamie Gruener wrote: Folks, I'm an IT guy setting up Review Board for our developers but I can't seem to get Review Board to talk to our SVN servers. Environment Notes: * Review Board 2.0.2 via easy_install -U ReviewBoard * Package pysvn-1.7.6-1.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest version * CentOS 6.5 (Final) * Package subversion-1.6.11-10.el6_5.x86_64 already installed and latest version I've successfully connected to a public Git repo, so something is working, but that doesn't get me where I need to go, which is accessing our own internal SVN server. See the log below. I can't connect to any of 3 separate SVN servers through Review Board. I can connect successfully if I just use svn from the command line, but while that confirms that the port is open, it doesn't tell me much about Review Board. 15:27:11INFO - Using reviewboard.scmtools.svn.pysvn backend for SVN 15:27:11ERROR - Exception thrown for user admin at https://Internal_ReviewBoard_host_name/api/repositories/1/branches/?api_format=json OPTIONS of 'http://IP_ADDR:PORT/svn': could not connect to server (IP_ADDR:PORT) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py, line 112, in get_response response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/decorators/cache.py, line 52, in _wrapped_view_func response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/decorators/vary.py, line 19, in inner_func response = func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py, line 493, in __call__ result = view(request, api_format=api_format, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 117, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.2-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/webapi/decorators.py, line 110, in _check return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 117, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.2-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/webapi/decorators.py, line 31, in _check return webapi_login_required(view_func)(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 117, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 138, in _checklogin return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py, line 117, in _call return view_func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.2-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources/repository_branches.py, line 53, in get for branch in repository.get_branches(): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.2-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 257, in get_branches self.BRANCHES_CACHE_PERIOD) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.4-py2.6.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py, line 118, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.2-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/__init__.py, line 132, in get_branches raise SCMError(e) SCMError: OPTIONS of 'http://IP_ADDR:PORT/svn': could not connect to server (IP_ADDR:PORT) 15:27:18DEBUG - Cache miss for key jsi18n-djangojs-reviewboard_djblets-en-1402932361. This patch is present: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3303 What am I missing? Thanks, --jamie -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
unable to easy_install rbnotefield from Beanbag, Inc.
If I try to install rbnotefield I get an error about a hostname mismatch:
[root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbnotefield
Searching for rbnotefield
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbnotefield/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname
'www.reviewboard.org' doesn't match either of 'beanbaginc.com',
'www.beanbaginc.com' -- Some packages may not be found!
No local packages or download links found for rbnotefield
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('rbnotefield')
If I try to install rbseverity, that works, but I get the same error and
the package downloads from another location:
[root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbseverity
Searching for rbseverity
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbseverity/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbseverity/0.5/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname
'www.reviewboard.org' doesn't match either of 'beanbaginc.com',
'www.beanbaginc.com' -- Some packages may not be found!
Best match: rbseverity 0.5
Downloading
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbseverity/0.5/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Processing rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Extracting rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
Adding rbseverity 0.5 to easy-install.pth file
Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Processing dependencies for rbseverity
Finished processing dependencies for rbseverity
FYI, I'm not a developer, I'm a sysadmin setting this up for developers.
Any input helpful.
Thanks,
--Jamie
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: unable to easy_install rbnotefield from Beanbag, Inc.
Jamie,
It looks like we had a snag in our release process, and the download URL
wasn't registered in PyPI. I've fixed this, and you should be able to
easy_install rbnotefield now.
-David
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jamie Gruener ja...@nortonstreet.biz
wrote:
If I try to install rbnotefield I get an error about a hostname mismatch:
[root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbnotefield
Searching for rbnotefield
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbnotefield/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname '
www.reviewboard.org' doesn't match either of 'beanbaginc.com', '
www.beanbaginc.com' -- Some packages may not be found!
No local packages or download links found for rbnotefield
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('rbnotefield')
If I try to install rbseverity, that works, but I get the same error and
the package downloads from another location:
[root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbseverity
Searching for rbseverity
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbseverity/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbseverity/0.5/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname '
www.reviewboard.org' doesn't match either of 'beanbaginc.com', '
www.beanbaginc.com' -- Some packages may not be found!
Best match: rbseverity 0.5
Downloading
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbseverity/0.5/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Processing rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Extracting rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
Adding rbseverity 0.5 to easy-install.pth file
Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Processing dependencies for rbseverity
Finished processing dependencies for rbseverity
FYI, I'm not a developer, I'm a sysadmin setting this up for developers.
Any input helpful.
Thanks,
--Jamie
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: unable to easy_install rbnotefield from Beanbag, Inc.
Thanks for the quick response! Works as expected now.
--Jamie
On Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:36:11 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
Jamie,
It looks like we had a snag in our release process, and the download URL
wasn't registered in PyPI. I've fixed this, and you should be able to
easy_install rbnotefield now.
-David
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jamie Gruener ja...@nortonstreet.biz
javascript: wrote:
If I try to install rbnotefield I get an error about a hostname mismatch:
[root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbnotefield
Searching for rbnotefield
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbnotefield/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname '
www.reviewboard.org' doesn't match either of 'beanbaginc.com', '
www.beanbaginc.com' -- Some packages may not be found!
No local packages or download links found for rbnotefield
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('rbnotefield')
If I try to install rbseverity, that works, but I get the same error and
the package downloads from another location:
[root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbseverity
Searching for rbseverity
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbseverity/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbseverity/0.5/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname '
www.reviewboard.org' doesn't match either of 'beanbaginc.com', '
www.beanbaginc.com' -- Some packages may not be found!
Best match: rbseverity 0.5
Downloading
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbseverity/0.5/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Processing rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Extracting rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
Adding rbseverity 0.5 to easy-install.pth file
Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rbseverity-0.5-py2.6.egg
Processing dependencies for rbseverity
Finished processing dependencies for rbseverity
FYI, I'm not a developer, I'm a sysadmin setting this up for developers.
Any input helpful.
Thanks,
--Jamie
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Adding a new diff to existent review Loops on loading
Hi David, I attached the snapshot. https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-2OjZUJa4wCw/U8hUR39W9VI/Bu0/CIoMzjQrqOg/s1600/Network.PNG On Friday, July 18, 2014 6:49:04 AM UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote: Can you use the Network tab to find the contents of the response (the one returning HTTP 400)? -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:44 PM, MoonWalker daniel.c...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: sorry, this is the full one 1. POST http://codereview.devneta.local/api/review-requests/559/diffs/ 400 (BAD REQUEST) jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 1. sendjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 2. p.extend.ajaxjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 3. fileUploadXhr3rdparty.min.js:4 4. $.fn.ajaxSubmit3rdparty.min.js:4 5. doCallbase.min.js:1 6. nextjquery.gravy.min.js:1 7. startjquery.gravy.min.js:1 8. RB.apiCallbase.min.js:1 9. Backbone.ajaxbase.min.js:1 10. a.sync3rdparty.min.js:4 11. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.syncbase.min.js:1 12. h.extend.save3rdparty.min.js:3 13. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend._saveObjectbase.min.js:1 14. ready.readybase.min.js:1 15. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.readybase.min.js:1 16. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.ensureCreated base.min.js:1 17. ready.readybase.min.js:1 18. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.readybase.min.js:1 19. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.readybase.min.js:1 20. RB.BaseResource.Backbone.Model.extend.savebase.min.js:1 21. sendbase.min.js:1 22. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 23. p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 24. g.handle.hjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 25. p.event.triggerjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 26. (anonymous function)jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 27. p.extend.eachjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 28. p.fn.p.eachjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 29. p.fn.extend.triggerjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 30. p.fn.(anonymous function)jquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 31. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 32. p.event.dispatchjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 33. g.handle.hjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'msg' of undefined base.min.js:1 1. displayErrorsbase.min.js:1 2. options.dataStoreObject.save.errorbase.min.js:1 3. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 4. e.error3rdparty.min.js:4 5. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 6. kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 7. l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 8. yjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 9. d On Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:42:21 PM UTC+10, MoonWalker wrote: I noticed this issue several times, and I enabled all the logs and some how there is zero information on them about this issue. I enabled JavaScript console in my browser (chrome latest version under Windows 7) and this is what I get. 1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'msg' of undefined base.min.js:1 1. displayErrorsbase.min.js:1 2. options.dataStoreObject.save.errorbase.min.js:1 3. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 4. e.error3rdparty.min.js:4 5. (anonymous function)base.min.js:1 6. kjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 7. l.fireWithjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 8. yjquery-1.8.2.min.js:2 9. d 2. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Error when diff files on ReviewBoard site
Hi, Anyone can help me please? -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request
Hi david
I observer another thing. When i remove the postreview.py file and use
hello.txt as file and make changes.It is creating the diff but i can't view
the diff in view diff button in reviewboard server. Is there any extension
and file size restriction i am facing? i am attaching the log. Please help
me on that.
E:\svn\newReporbt post --debug
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path:
https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain.com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports
changesets: False
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/info/
DEBUG:root:Running: svn st
DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to
http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to
http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to
http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/95/diffs/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to
http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/95/diffs/
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to
http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/95/draft/
Review request #95 posted.
http://107.109.6.236/r/95/
Thanks
Shahadat
On Friday, July 18, 2014 2:54:23 AM UTC+6, David Trowbridge wrote:
Can you try running 'svn up' and retrying the 'rbt post' command? SVN
sometimes has issues with partially-synced trees after certain types of
operations.
-David
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Shahadat Hossain s.hoss...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Dear Concern,
I am using Reviewboard server 1.7.26 and RBTtools 0.5.7 for creating
review-request in reviewboard server with post-review support.But i am
currently having problem while creating diff on files in reviewboard
server. Please check the below log while creating the diff in reviewboard
server.
post-review --debug
The post-review tool is deprecated in favor of therbt suite of
commands. post-review will go away in RBTools 0.6.x.
RBTools 0.5.7
Python 2.7.3 (default, Feb 27 2014, 20:00:17)
[GCC 4.6.3]
Running on Linux-3.2.0-65-generic-pae-i686-with-Ubuntu-12.04-precise
Home = /home/sbrc
Current Directory = /home/sbrc/svn/new/newRepository/newRepo
Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path:
https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain.com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports
changesets: False
Finished checking the repository type.
HTTP GETting api/info/
DEBUG:root:Running: svn st
DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info postreview.py
HTTP GETting api/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/info/
Using the new web API
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/1/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/1/info/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/2/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/2/info/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/3/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/3/info/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/4/
HTTP GETting http://107.109.6.236/api/repositories/4/info/
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path:
https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain.com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports
changesets: False
Attempting to create review request on svn for None
HTTP POSTing to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/:
{'repository': 'svn'}
Review request created
Uploading diff, size: 764
HTTP POSTing to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/82/diffs/:
{'basedir': '/'}
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'file': u'/postreview.py', u'err':
{u'msg': u'The file was not found in the repository', u'code': 207},
u'revision': u'4'}
Error uploading diff
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
For more options, visit
Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request
Also i am getting the below error in the reviewboard server while i try to view the diff from view diff button. Diff currently unavailable. *Error:* The patch to '/hello.txt' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N-new.rej Details http://107.109.6.236/r/92/diff/# Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 251, in view_diff_fragment diff_file = get_requested_diff_file() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 171, in get_requested_diff_file populate_diff_chunks(files, highlighting, request=request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 344, in populate_diff_chunks chunks = generator.get_chunks() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 137, in get_chunks large_data=True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.30-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 157, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 136, in lambda lambda: list(self._get_chunks_uncached()), File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 142, in _get_chunks_uncached new = get_patched_file(old, self.filediff, self.request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 152, in get_patched_file return patch(diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file, request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 96, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to '/hello.txt' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N-new.rej Thanks Shahadat On Friday, July 18, 2014 9:32:57 AM UTC+6, Shahadat Hossain wrote: Hi david I observer another thing. When i remove the postreview.py file and use hello.txt as file and make changes.It is creating the diff but i can't view the diff in view diff button in reviewboard server. Is there any extension and file size restriction i am facing? i am attaching the log. Please help me on that. E:\svn\newReporbt post --debug DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository... DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain.com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports changesets: False DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/info/ DEBUG:root:Running: svn st DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/95/diffs/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/95/diffs/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/review-requests/95/draft/ Review request #95 posted. http://107.109.6.236/r/95/ Thanks Shahadat On Friday, July 18, 2014 2:54:23 AM UTC+6, David Trowbridge wrote: Can you try running 'svn up' and retrying the 'rbt post' command? SVN sometimes has issues with partially-synced trees after certain types of operations. -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Shahadat Hossain s.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Concern, I am using Reviewboard server 1.7.26 and RBTtools 0.5.7 for creating review-request in reviewboard server with post-review support.But i am currently having problem while creating diff on files in reviewboard server. Please check the below log while creating the diff in reviewboard server. post-review --debug The post-review tool is deprecated in favor of therbt suite of commands. post-review will go away in RBTools 0.6.x. RBTools 0.5.7 Python 2.7.3 (default, Feb 27 2014,
Re: Error when diff files on ReviewBoard site
A couple questions: - Can you check the contents of the new 2.txt.diff file and see if it's what you expect? - Can you check the contents of the tmpeeeSkZ file and see if it's what you expect? - What revision control system? - What version of GNU patch? -David On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:56 AM, hoàng tuấn hoangnt00...@gmail.com wrote: After reinstall, I make a new request i face the same problem *Exception: The patch to '//depot/P4Test/new 2.txt' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.GPEAUp' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.* https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-z8Pdw27H_xU/U6vuG4PlmoI/ABo/orDlIsC4yRM/s1600/Capture.PNGAnd this is the result when i enter the /tmp.reviewboard.GPEAUp https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-z8Pdw27H_xU/U6vuG4PlmoI/ABo/orDlIsC4yRM/s1600/Capture.PNG -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request
Can you check the contents of the tmp file and the patch file and verify that they're what you expect? -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Shahadat Hossain s.hossain1...@gmail.com wrote: Also i am getting the below error in the reviewboard server while i try to view the diff from view diff button. Diff currently unavailable. *Error:* The patch to '/hello.txt' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N-new.rej Details http://107.109.6.236/r/92/diff/# Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 251, in view_diff_fragment diff_file = get_requested_diff_file() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 171, in get_requested_diff_file populate_diff_chunks(files, highlighting, request=request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 344, in populate_diff_chunks chunks = generator.get_chunks() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 137, in get_chunks large_data=True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.30-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 157, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 136, in lambda lambda: list(self._get_chunks_uncached()), File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py, line 142, in _get_chunks_uncached new = get_patched_file(old, self.filediff, self.request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 152, in get_patched_file return patch(diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file, request) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.26-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 96, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to '/hello.txt' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL/tmp8IOq8N-new.rej Thanks Shahadat On Friday, July 18, 2014 9:32:57 AM UTC+6, Shahadat Hossain wrote: Hi david I observer another thing. When i remove the postreview.py file and use hello.txt as file and make changes.It is creating the diff but i can't view the diff in view diff button in reviewboard server. Is there any extension and file size restriction i am facing? i am attaching the log. Please help me on that. E:\svn\newReporbt post --debug DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository... DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: https://s-12510870.sbrcdomain. com/svn/newRepo, Base path: /, Supports changesets: False DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/info/ DEBUG:root:Running: svn st DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Running: svn info hello.txt DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ review-requests/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ review-requests/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ review-requests/95/diffs/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP POST request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ review-requests/95/diffs/ DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http://107.109.6.236/api/ review-requests/95/draft/ Review request #95 posted. http://107.109.6.236/r/95/ Thanks Shahadat On Friday, July 18, 2014 2:54:23 AM UTC+6, David Trowbridge wrote: Can you try running 'svn up' and retrying the 'rbt post' command? SVN sometimes has issues with partially-synced trees after certain types of operations. -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Shahadat Hossain s.hoss...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Concern, I am using Reviewboard server 1.7.26 and RBTtools 0.5.7 for creating review-request in reviewboard server with post-review support.But i am currently having problem while creating diff on files in reviewboard server. Please check the below log while creating the diff in
Issue 3486 in reviewboard: Upgrade 2.0 to 2.0.3 fails
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3486 by drzo...@gmail.com: Upgrade 2.0 to 2.0.3 fails
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3486
What version are you running?
2.0
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
All, unable to access after upgrade. See log below.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. easy_install --index-url=https://pypi.mycopany.com -U ReviewBoard
2. rb-site upgrade /srv/reviewboard-env/reviewboard.mycompany/
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expect: no error.
Actual: output of running rb-site upgrade:
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.0 to 2.0.3
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
CommandError: Error applying evolution:
constraint scmtools_repository_df00fa5c of relation scmtools_repository
does not exist
When Accessing review board I get this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
line 88, in get_response
response = middleware_method(request)
File /srv/reviewboard-env/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.3-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/accounts/middleware.py,
line 14, in process_request
user = request.user.get_profile()
File /srv/reviewboard-env/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.3-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/accounts/models.py,
line 284, in _get_profile
self._profile = Profile.objects.get(user=self)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/manager.py,
line 151, in get
return self.get_queryset().get(*args, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
line 304, in get
num = len(clone)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
line 77, in __len__
self._fetch_all()
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
line 857, in _fetch_all
self._result_cache = list(self.iterator())
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
line 220, in iterator
for row in compiler.results_iter():
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py,
line 713, in results_iter
for rows in self.execute_sql(MULTI):
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py,
line 786, in execute_sql
cursor.execute(sql, params)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/backends/util.py,
line 53, in execute
return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/utils.py,
line 99, in __exit__
six.reraise(dj_exc_type, dj_exc_value, traceback)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.6.egg/django/db/backends/util.py,
line 53, in execute
return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
ProgrammingError: column accounts_profile.should_send_email does not exist
LINE 1: ..._id, accounts_profile.first_time_setup_done, accounts_...
What operating system are you using? What browser?
Please provide any additional information below.
Some info from our reviewdatabase. The scmtools_repository_df00fa5c
constrain is an index, and it seems to exist:
reviewboard= \dS+ scmtools_repository
Table public.scmtools_repository
Column | Type |
Modifiers | Storage | Stats target |
Description
++--+--+--+-
id | integer| not null default
nextval('scmtools_repository_id_seq'::regclass) | plain| |
name | character varying(64) | not
null | extended
| |
path | character varying(255) | not
null | extended
| |
mirror_path| character varying(255) | not
null | extended
| |
raw_file_url | character varying(255) | not
null | extended
|
Re: Issue 3404 in reviewboard: A list of users should be presented when choosing reviewers
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 3404 by trowb...@gmail.com: A list of users should be presented when choosing reviewers http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3404 This isn't feasible. Most Review Board installations have at least 50 users, and a large number have hundreds or thousands of users. Both usernames and real names will show up as suggestions when you start typing, which should make it plenty easy to find the person you're looking for. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
