Re: How to stop new reviews being created on 1.6.16 from RBTools?
Hi David, Thanks for replying. It was necessary for me to get confidence in the migration procedure and my earlier post was made when I have not really practised it. At the end of last week I was ready and I moved the rbsite/database (~140MB) over to the new server and switched the older server off as you suggested. The site/DB upgrade scripts worked with no issues, so thanks guys for supporting the upgrade path with quality scripts. Regards, Stephen. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Cursor placement issues in 'View diff' comment dialogue RB 2.0.3
Hi, I've noticed an issue with the cursor placement in the comment dialogue used when adding comments to a line of code in a 'View diff' review mode. It seems the when do I wrap code used for painting the text to the writeable field is working differently to the wrap code used for cursor position. I see this quite often in the default sized dialogue the cursor ends up ahead of the actual insertion point due to the word wrap decision of the previous line(s). See attached. It would be good to get this fixed soon as it occurs in almost every comment I add in a review. If there is a workaround then let me know, maybe it is my browser (Internet Explorer) or the default fonts I'm using. Thanks, Stephen. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Cursor placement issues in 'View diff' comment dialogue RB 2.0.3
Seems to work without issues in Firefox 30.0 however. I was using IE 11.0.10 where the problem occurs in Windows 7. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Formatting errors in description field
Unfortunately that didn't help: using RBTools 0.6.2 it still is not correctly formatted Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014 22:29:16 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: I believe that things should be fixed just by upgrading your version of rbtools and swapping out 'post-review' for 'rbt post'. -David On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com javascript: wrote: We are all creating our review with this git alias: prd = !sh -c 'git fetch origin git push origin -u $(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) post-review -d --guess-summary --description=\$(git log origin/develop...HEAD)\ --branch=$(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) --tracking-branch=origin/develop --target-groups=$(git config reviewboard.group) --repository-url=$(git config reviewboard.repository) --server=$(git config reviewboard.url) --open' Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014 22:10:30 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: How are you putting the git log into the description? By hand? With the JSON API? Using arguments to post-review? -David On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Okay, can that be fixed? I don't want to change our templates. Or can markdown be disabled? Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 23:51:20 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: OK, I believe that the problem is the indentation. Markdown treats indented text as a code block, and won't handle any markdown syntax in it. -David On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Sorry for the late answer - I did not get any notification :/ Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014 22:30:38 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: Can you show what the source markdown looks like? (Click the pencil and then copy/paste/redact) -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have upgraded our reviewboard installation from 1.7.x to 2.0.3. Unfortunately we have some issues with the formatting of the description field. We are using the post-review tool in our scripts to post our reviews. Inside the description field we put the git commit log entries. As you can see in the attachment, there are problems displaying the links. I've searched the bug tracker but unfortunately I'm getting http 500 errors from google code for this issue: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3377 -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/pow erpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/pow erpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Formatting errors in description field
Hi Philip, Unless you specifically post with a flag enabling Markdown, we convert the text to valid Markdown. I believe when we do this, we don’t escape sequences of 4 spaces, which ends up triggering Markdown’s inline mode. So, this is a bug in Review Board. We would need to basically recognize 4+ leading spaces and insert some backslashes (which is ugly, but necessary for this). Can you file a new bug for this? (The HTTP 500 errors on the bug tracker are annoying… We’ve been unable to get Google to care about this problem.) Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 3:14:57 AM, Philip Schiffer (philip.schif...@sprylab.com) wrote: Unfortunately that didn't help: using RBTools 0.6.2 it still is not correctly formatted Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014 22:29:16 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: I believe that things should be fixed just by upgrading your version of rbtools and swapping out 'post-review' for 'rbt post'. -David On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: We are all creating our review with this git alias: prd = !sh -c 'git fetch origin git push origin -u $(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) post-review -d --guess-summary --description=\$(git log origin/develop...HEAD)\ --branch=$(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) --tracking-branch=origin/develop --target-groups=$(git config reviewboard.group) --repository-url=$(git config reviewboard.repository) --server=$(git config reviewboard.url) --open' Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014 22:10:30 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: How are you putting the git log into the description? By hand? With the JSON API? Using arguments to post-review? -David On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Okay, can that be fixed? I don't want to change our templates. Or can markdown be disabled? Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 23:51:20 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: OK, I believe that the problem is the indentation. Markdown treats indented text as a code block, and won't handle any markdown syntax in it. -David On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Sorry for the late answer - I did not get any notification :/ Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014 22:30:38 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: Can you show what the source markdown looks like? (Click the pencil and then copy/paste/redact) -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have upgraded our reviewboard installation from 1.7.x to 2.0.3. Unfortunately we have some issues with the formatting of the description field. We are using the post-review tool in our scripts to post our reviews. Inside the description field we put the git commit log entries. As you can see in the attachment, there are problems displaying the links. I've searched the bug tracker but unfortunately I'm getting http 500 errors from google code for this issue: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3377 -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Problem setting up Subversion repo
Hi, I have a problem with setting up SVN as a repository: A repository was not found at the specified path. And from httpd logs: [Tue Jul 29 17:25:32 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project': authorization failed (https://svn.mycompany.com), 170001) [Tue Jul 29 18:04:39 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn: (OPTIONS of 'https:// svn.mycompany.com/svn': 200 OK (https://svn.mycompany.com), 175002) Information for project app trunk: $svn info Path: . URL: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project/app/trunk Repository Root: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project I use definitely correct login/password that I put in on Repository configuration page. I tried a few ones in ReviewBoard and all of them produce the error above albeit using them for svn checkout succeeds. I also tried different svn roots like https://svn.mycompany.com, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/myproj/trunk but all of them were causing the same error. Reviewboard 2.0.5, RBtools 0.6.2, subversion 1.6.15 (both client and repo), subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg, CentOS 5.10 x64. Thanks. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Problem setting up Subversion repo
Hi Roman, What type of authentication does the server expect? Simple username/password, or more? Can you check the log files to see whether PySVN or Subvertpy is being used? Also, any unusual characters (such as Unicode) in your password? Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 12:10:06 PM, Roman Parkhunovsky (esqrot...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have a problem with setting up SVN as a repository: A repository was not found at the specified path. And from httpd logs: [Tue Jul 29 17:25:32 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project': authorization failed (https://svn.mycompany.com), 170001) [Tue Jul 29 18:04:39 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn': 200 OK (https://svn.mycompany.com), 175002) Information for project app trunk: $svn info Path: . URL: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project/app/trunk Repository Root: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project I use definitely correct login/password that I put in on Repository configuration page. I tried a few ones in ReviewBoard and all of them produce the error above albeit using them for svn checkout succeeds. I also tried different svn roots like https://svn.mycompany.com, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/myproj/trunk but all of them were causing the same error. Reviewboard 2.0.5, RBtools 0.6.2, subversion 1.6.15 (both client and repo), subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg, CentOS 5.10 x64. Thanks. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Formatting errors in description field
It's not that important. It can stay that way. Am Dienstag, 29. Juli 2014 22:00:05 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Hammond: Hi Philip, We can’t, but we can delete the ticket. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 3:29:22 AM, Philip Schiffer (philip@sprylab.com javascript:) wrote: I've created it: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3503 (Can you redact the url? I forgot to do this :/) Am Dienstag, 29. Juli 2014 12:21:35 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Hammond: Hi Philip, Unless you specifically post with a flag enabling Markdown, we convert the text to valid Markdown. I believe when we do this, we don’t escape sequences of 4 spaces, which ends up triggering Markdown’s inline mode. So, this is a bug in Review Board. We would need to basically recognize 4+ leading spaces and insert some backslashes (which is ugly, but necessary for this). Can you file a new bug for this? (The HTTP 500 errors on the bug tracker are annoying… We’ve been unable to get Google to care about this problem.) Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 3:14:57 AM, Philip Schiffer (philip@sprylab.com) wrote: Unfortunately that didn't help: using RBTools 0.6.2 it still is not correctly formatted Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014 22:29:16 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: I believe that things should be fixed just by upgrading your version of rbtools and swapping out 'post-review' for 'rbt post'. -David On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: We are all creating our review with this git alias: prd = !sh -c 'git fetch origin git push origin -u $(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) post-review -d --guess-summary --description=\$(git log origin/develop...HEAD)\ --branch=$(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) --tracking-branch=origin/develop --target-groups=$(git config reviewboard.group) --repository-url=$(git config reviewboard.repository) --server=$(git config reviewboard.url) --open' Am Montag, 28. Juli 2014 22:10:30 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: How are you putting the git log into the description? By hand? With the JSON API? Using arguments to post-review? -David On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Okay, can that be fixed? I don't want to change our templates. Or can markdown be disabled? Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014 23:51:20 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: OK, I believe that the problem is the indentation. Markdown treats indented text as a code block, and won't handle any markdown syntax in it. -David On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Sorry for the late answer - I did not get any notification :/ Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014 22:30:38 UTC+2 schrieb David Trowbridge: Can you show what the source markdown looks like? (Click the pencil and then copy/paste/redact) -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Philip Schiffer philip@sprylab.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have upgraded our reviewboard installation from 1.7.x to 2.0.3. Unfortunately we have some issues with the formatting of the description field. We are using the post-review tool in our scripts to post our reviews. Inside the description field we put the git commit log entries. As you can see in the attachment, there are problems displaying the links. I've searched the bug tracker but unfortunately I'm getting http 500 errors from google code for this issue: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3377 -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at
Re: Problem setting up Subversion repo
Hi, Christian, thanks for a quick reply. I'm using subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg installed by easy_install26 and python2.6. SVN requires simple username/password, it consists of upper, lower symbols and numbers only. Thanks. Вівторок, 29 липня 2014 р. 14:42:19 UTC-5 користувач Christian Hammond написав: Hi Roman, What type of authentication does the server expect? Simple username/password, or more? Can you check the log files to see whether PySVN or Subvertpy is being used? Also, any unusual characters (such as Unicode) in your password? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 12:10:06 PM, Roman Parkhunovsky (esqr...@gmail.com javascript:) wrote: Hi, I have a problem with setting up SVN as a repository: A repository was not found at the specified path. And from httpd logs: [Tue Jul 29 17:25:32 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project': authorization failed (https://svn.mycompany.com), 170001) [Tue Jul 29 18:04:39 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn: (OPTIONS of 'https:// svn.mycompany.com/svn': 200 OK (https://svn.mycompany.com), 175002) Information for project app trunk: $svn info Path: . URL: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project/app/trunk Repository Root: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project I use definitely correct login/password that I put in on Repository configuration page. I tried a few ones in ReviewBoard and all of them produce the error above albeit using them for svn checkout succeeds. I also tried different svn roots like https://svn.mycompany.com, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/myproj/trunk but all of them were causing the same error. Reviewboard 2.0.5, RBtools 0.6.2, subversion 1.6.15 (both client and repo), subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg, CentOS 5.10 x64. Thanks. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Power Pack 1.0.4 is released
Hey everyone, We just put out a release of Power Pack 1.0.4. Power Pack is our premium add-on to Review Board that offers PDF document review, GitHub Enterprise, and more. The new version of Power Pack makes it easier to install new trial licenses, and enhances our support for PDF rendering. More details are up on the announcement at https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/07/29/power-pack-1-0-4-released/ For more information on Power Pack, see https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Problem setting up Subversion repo
Can you try uninstalling Subvertpy and installing PySVN? Subvertpy support is new, and I want to rule it out as a problem. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 6:07:57 PM, Roman Parkhunovsky (esqrot...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, Christian, thanks for a quick reply. I'm using subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg installed by easy_install26 and python2.6. SVN requires simple username/password, it consists of upper, lower symbols and numbers only. Thanks. Вівторок, 29 липня 2014 р. 14:42:19 UTC-5 користувач Christian Hammond написав: Hi Roman, What type of authentication does the server expect? Simple username/password, or more? Can you check the log files to see whether PySVN or Subvertpy is being used? Also, any unusual characters (such as Unicode) in your password? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 29, 2014 at 12:10:06 PM, Roman Parkhunovsky (esqr...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have a problem with setting up SVN as a repository: A repository was not found at the specified path. And from httpd logs: [Tue Jul 29 17:25:32 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project': authorization failed (https://svn.mycompany.com), 170001) [Tue Jul 29 18:04:39 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn': 200 OK (https://svn.mycompany.com), 175002) Information for project app trunk: $svn info Path: . URL: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project/app/trunk Repository Root: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project I use definitely correct login/password that I put in on Repository configuration page. I tried a few ones in ReviewBoard and all of them produce the error above albeit using them for svn checkout succeeds. I also tried different svn roots like https://svn.mycompany.com, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/myproj/trunk but all of them were causing the same error. Reviewboard 2.0.5, RBtools 0.6.2, subversion 1.6.15 (both client and repo), subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg, CentOS 5.10 x64. Thanks. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Problem setting up Subversion repo
I uninstalled Subvertpy but the package from centos repository was built for python2.4 so I had to compile pysvn-1.6.3 from source. (You need to install e2fsprogs-devel, neon-devel in case one needs to compile). Now I can add repositories and I can see latest commits when creating a review. If you need more information I'd be glad to provide it for figuring out subvertpy issue. Thanks. Вівторок, 29 липня 2014 р. 13:29:21 UTC-5 користувач Roman Parkhunovsky написав: Hi, I have a problem with setting up SVN as a repository: A repository was not found at the specified path. And from httpd logs: [Tue Jul 29 17:25:32 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project': authorization failed (https://svn.mycompany.com), 170001) [Tue Jul 29 18:04:39 2014] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get repository information for https://svn.mycompany.com/svn: (OPTIONS of 'https://svn.mycompany.com/svn': 200 OK (https://svn.mycompany.com), 175002) Information for project app trunk: $svn info Path: . URL: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project/app/trunk Repository Root: https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/project I use definitely correct login/password that I put in on Repository configuration page. I tried a few ones in ReviewBoard and all of them produce the error above albeit using them for svn checkout succeeds. I also tried different svn roots like https://svn.mycompany.com, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn, https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/myproj/trunk but all of them were causing the same error. Reviewboard 2.0.5, RBtools 0.6.2, subversion 1.6.15 (both client and repo), subvertpy-0.9.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg, CentOS 5.10 x64. Thanks. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3503 in reviewboard: Formattings errors in description field
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3503 by philip.s...@sprylab.com: Formattings errors in description field http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3503 What version are you running? 2.0.5 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? https://reviews.sprylab.com/r/ID/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. create a commit 2. create a review with rbt post and the following command: rbt post -d --guess-summary --description=\$(git log origin/develop...HEAD)\ --branch=$(git name-rev --name-only HEAD) --tracking-branch=origin/develop --target-groups=$(git config reviewboard.group) --repository-url=$(git config reviewboard.repository) --server=$(git config reviewboard.url) --open What is the expected output? What do you see instead? There are erros in the formatting of the description field. This is described in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/K0VTVC0mglQ What operating system are you using? What browser? Chrome stable / Windows 7, RbTool 0.6.2 Please provide any additional information below. See thread https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/K0VTVC0mglQ -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3504 in reviewboard: Support mediawiki as a backend for reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3504 by jmwal...@gmail.com: Support mediawiki as a backend for reviewboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3504 What version are you running? 1.7.25 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? -none- Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. Our company avidly uses both mediawiki and reviewboard. I'm interested in soliciting feedback on some wiki text, and while I think I can rig up a hack for a new file, I'm realizing it'd be really nice to actually be able to review specific new versions of the file too. I could imagine an rbt post --source-url=wiki page url [or perhaps it needs to be something other than post?] which puts up a reviewboard request with the text from that page, and the ability to [out of band of the wiki] start comment threads on all the individual lines. What operating system are you using? What browser? -various- Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3505 in reviewboard: Empty drafts can be submitted
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3505 by anhi...@cisco.com: Empty drafts can be submitted http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3505 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be *** rejected. *** *** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially to *** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug *** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release. *** *** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *** *** If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ *** *** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other information *** that you include has been stripped of confidential information. What version are you running? e625b89 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? /r/N/ for any review request N with an unpublished draft What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create a new review request and don't fill out any fields 2. Choose Close-Submitted from the menu on the top right What is the expected output? What do you see instead? When attempting to publish a draft with missing fields, error dialogs prevent it. However, this can be circumvented by submitting the review request (and reopening it, if desired). What operating system are you using? What browser? N/A Please provide any additional information below. I came across this while trying to figure out how to validate extra fields for an extension, but I can't see how any fields are validated aside from a few JavaScript barriers. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3506 in reviewboard: Extension review request fields
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3506 by anhi...@cisco.com: Extension review request fields http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3506 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be *** rejected. *** *** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially to *** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug *** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release. *** *** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *** *** If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ *** *** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other information *** that you include has been stripped of confidential information. What version are you running? e625b89 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? /r/N/ for any review request N What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create and enable an extension with extra fields extending BaseEditableField and/or BaseTextAreaField with is_required = True 2. Create a new review request and observe the fields displayed correctly (with a * indicating that the field is required) 3. Publish the draft with empty required fields, and submit the review request with fields still empty What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Something somewhere should prevent either draft publication or review request submission when required fields are empty. However, currently the draft publication and review request submission complete successfully with empty required fields. What operating system are you using? What browser? N/A Please provide any additional information below. Since the ReviewRequestApprovalHook only applies to API checks, and doesn't give any means to prevent submission on missing fields, some sort of validation process should be baked into the custom fields. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Issue 3506 in reviewboard: Extension review request fields
Comment #1 on issue 3506 by anhi...@cisco.com: Extension review request fields http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3506 Sorry, the title is not descriptive because I forgot to finish typing it. It should read, Extension review request fields are never validated. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Issue 3505 in reviewboard: Empty drafts can be submitted
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Component-Reviews Comment #1 on issue 3505 by chip...@gmail.com: Empty drafts can be submitted http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3505 This happens because the submitted state is just a flag, and doesn't deal with drafts (and therefore field validation). We don't require anything for a submitted review request. That doesn't mean it's ideal, but fortunately, it's not a regression, from what I can tell. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Issue 3504 in reviewboard: Support mediawiki as a backend for reviewboard
Updates: Status: Confirmed Comment #1 on issue 3504 by chip...@gmail.com: Support mediawiki as a backend for reviewboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3504 We were considering this functionality for Power Pack. It would require some design changes for both RBTools and Review Board that would have to go into a future release. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
