Re: Review Board displays incorrectly

2015-01-12 Thread Justin Palmer
I installed CentOS 7 on a new VM, this time choosing Development and 
Creative Workstation along with several packages known to be required. 
This time, Review Board displays correctly. So I'm fairly confident there 
is a dependency problem of some sort. If I have time, I'm going to start 
comparing package lists.


On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 11:43:52 AM UTC-6, Stephen Gallagher wrote:




 On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 09:09 -0800, Justin Palmer wrote: 
  Yeah, I rebooted after. This was a fresh CentOS 7 minimal install. Do 
  you test on a full install which might have more packages, Apache 
  modules, python modules... 

 I usually test on a default install. I'll give a minimal install a shot 
 and see if I'm missing a dependency somewhere. 




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Review Board displays incorrectly

2015-01-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher



On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 07:02 -0800, Justin Palmer wrote:
 I installed CentOS 7 on a new VM, this time choosing Development and
 Creative Workstation along with several packages known to be
 required. This time, Review Board displays correctly. So I'm fairly
 confident there is a dependency problem of some sort. If I have time,
 I'm going to start comparing package lists.


Interesting, I just installed it from a minimal CentOS 7 installation
just now as well. I followed most of your steps as listed earlier except
for four additional ones.

1) yum install memcached; systemctl start memcached
I don't know if you were using a memcached server on another machine,
but if you used the defaults (localhost:11211), then you need to add
this manually. Memcached isn't a strict dependency because it doesn't
need to be running on the local machine. In Ubuntu terms, we might call
this a suggests dependency, but we don't have those in Fedora. Only
strict deps at the moment.

2) setsebool -P httpd_can_network_memcache on
Make sure SELinux allows apache to contact the local memcached server

3) setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect_db on
Make sure SELinux allows apache to contact the local postgresql server

4) Instead of 
echo Include apache-wsgi.conf  httpd.conf
I instead did
ln -s \
/var/lib/reviewboard/sites/reviewboard.c7.sgallagh.rht/conf/apache-wsgi.conf 
/etc/httpd/conf.d/reviewboard-reviewboard.c7.sgallagh.rht.conf

This should be functionally identical, though it's *possible* that the
merge happens differently.


2) and 3) are probably irrelevant since you said you weren't using
SELinux. My best guess is that your issues above were due to not having
a running memcached server. Everything is working fine for me.


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Exception on RB 1.7.5

2015-01-12 Thread Nilesh Jaiswal
Dear All,

I am using RB version 1.7.5, I see exception in the error.log.

I am wanted to know if this is harmful for the application?
How to fix it?

please advise and help

  except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
[Mon Jan 12 02:46:14 2015] [notice] child pid 10900 exit signal Aborted (6)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
FastCGI server instead.
  DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
  _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to
avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
class-based views instead.
  DeprecationWarning
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
STATIC_URL instead.
  use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
`supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
  DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
class-based views instead.
  DeprecationWarning
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/defaulttags.py:1235:
DeprecationWarning: The syntax for the url template tag is changing. Load
the `url` tag from the `future` tag library to start using the new behavior.
  category=DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py:1550:
DeprecationWarning: catching of string exceptions is deprecated
  except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
[Mon Jan 12 02:50:56 2015] [notice] child pid 13222 exit signal Aborted (6)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
FastCGI server instead.
  DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
  _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to
avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
class-based views instead.
  DeprecationWarning
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
STATIC_URL instead.
  use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
`supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
  DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
class-based views instead.
  DeprecationWarning
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/defaulttags.py:1235:
DeprecationWarning: The syntax for the url template tag is changing. Load
the `url` tag from the `future` tag library to start using the new behavior.
  category=DeprecationWarning)
Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
[Mon Jan 12 03:28:56 2015] [notice] child pid 10904 exit signal Aborted (6)

Thanks,
Nilesh

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Issue 3715 in reviewboard: markdown_utils.py line 241, in iter_markdown_lines i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'instance' and 'int'

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 3715 by mami...@gmail.com: markdown_utils.py line 241, in  
iter_markdown_lines  i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for  
+=: 'instance' and 'int'

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3715

*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be
*** rejected.
***
*** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially
to
*** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug
*** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release.
***
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
***
*** If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
***
*** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other
information
*** that you include has been stripped of confidential information.


What version are you running?
2.0.12

What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
https://bld-rb01.cisco.com/r/13072/

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Not sure - the screen is just crashing after upgrade.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The screen should not crash.

What operating system are you using? What browser?
Red Hat Linux 5.5 server and Google Chrome browser.

Please provide any additional information below.

2015-01-12 15:33:50,719 - ERROR -  - Exception thrown for user mamiles at  
https://bld-rb01.cisco.com/r/13072/


unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'instance' and 'int'
Traceback (most recent call last):
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/bas

e.py, line 112, in get_response
response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accoun

ts/decorators.py, line 21, in _check
return login_required(view_func)(*args, **kwargs)
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/auth/deco

rators.py, line 22, in _wrapped_view
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/site/d

ecorators.py, line 35, in _check
return view_func(request, local_site=local_site, *args, **kwargs)
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/review

s/views.py, line 663, in review_detail
changedesc.fields_changed[field_id])
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,  
line 161, in get_change_entry_sections_html

'rendered_html': mark_safe(self.render_change_entry_html(info)),
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/fields.py,  
line 514, in render_change_entry_html

new_lines = list(iter_markdown_lines(new_value))
   
File /local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/markdown_utils.py,  
line 241, in iter_markdown_lines

i += 1
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'instance' and 'int'



--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3715 in reviewboard: markdown_utils.py line 241, in iter_markdown_lines i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'instance' and 'int'

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard


Comment #1 on issue 3715 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown_utils.py line 241,  
in iter_markdown_lines  i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for  
+=: 'instance' and 'int'

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3715

Hmm, that seems very strange. `i` is never anything but an integer in that  
code.


We have a support contract with Cisco covering at least some of the servers  
there. I don't know if this is one of them, but let me reach out to our  
contact there. We might be able to arrange to get more information on this.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Exception on RB 1.7.5

2015-01-12 Thread David Trowbridge
It looks like there's a problem with your mod_python.

mod_python is deprecated and unmaintained. The recommended way to deploy
Python applications with Apache (including Review Board) is mod_wsgi.

-David

On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 7:36:32 AM Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am using RB version 1.7.5, I see exception in the error.log.

 I am wanted to know if this is harmful for the application?
 How to fix it?

 please advise and help

   except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 02:46:14 2015] [notice] child pid 10900 exit signal Aborted (6)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
 DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
 FastCGI server instead.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
   _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to
 avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
 DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
 STATIC_URL instead.
   use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
 `supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
 class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/defaulttags.py:1235:
 DeprecationWarning: The syntax for the url template tag is changing. Load
 the `url` tag from the `future` tag library to start using the new behavior.
   category=DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py:1550:
 DeprecationWarning: catching of string exceptions is deprecated
   except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 02:50:56 2015] [notice] child pid 13222 exit signal Aborted (6)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
 DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
 FastCGI server instead.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
   _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to
 avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
 DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
 STATIC_URL instead.
   use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
 `supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
 class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/defaulttags.py:1235:
 DeprecationWarning: The syntax for the url template tag is changing. Load
 the `url` tag from the `future` tag library to start using the new behavior.
   category=DeprecationWarning)
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 03:28:56 2015] [notice] child pid 10904 exit signal Aborted (6)

 Thanks,
 Nilesh

 --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message 

Re: Something broke! (Error 500) in dashboard page

2015-01-12 Thread David Trowbridge
Somehow something got corrupted in your database. If you go to Admin 
Database  Local site profiles, you should see two entries for the user who
is encountering this. If you delete one, everything should work correctly.

-David

On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 9:37:57 AM xfwangche...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello

 I have a clean install of v2.0.11 and everything seems well in the admin
 UI. but when I (as the default admin account) go to the
 http://reviews.example.com/dashboard/, I get the following error:

 Something broke! (Error 500)

 It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either a
 bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please report this to
 your administrator.

 and the following error can be found in the log file:

 and I create a new account and have got the same error.

 and I notice if the user post a review quest and then go to
 http://reviews.example.com/dashboard/, it works!!!

 It seems to happen if the user have no any review request.

 2015-01-12 13:27:52,851 - ERROR -  - Exception thrown for user admin at
 http://reviews.example.com/dashboard/

 get() returned more than one LocalSiteProfile -- it returned 2!
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py,
 line 112, in get_response
 response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/auth/decorators.py, line
 22, in _wrapped_view
 return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/site/decorators.py,
 line 35, in _check
 return view_func(request, local_site=local_site, *args, **kwargs)
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py, line
 44, in _check_valid_prefs
 return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/datagrids/views.py,
 line 58, in dashboard
 grid = DashboardDataGrid(request, local_site=local_site)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/datagrids/grids.py,
 line 204, in __init__
 profile=self.profile)[0]
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py,
 line 154, in get_or_create
 return self.get_queryset().get_or_create(**kwargs)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py, line
 376, in get_or_create
 return self.get(**lookup), False
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py, line
 313, in get
 (self.model._meta.object_name, num))
 MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one LocalSiteProfile --
 it returned 2!

  --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3660 in reviewboard: Files randomly get lost from a review request (This is an empty file.)

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 3601

Comment #15 on issue 3660 by trowb...@gmail.com: Files randomly get lost  
from a review request (This is an empty file.)

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3660

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3601 in reviewboard: Diffs disappearing and replaced with This is an empty file.

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard


Comment #8 on issue 3601 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diffs disappearing and  
replaced with This is an empty file.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3601

Issue 3660 has been merged into this issue.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3659 in reviewboard: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to differentiate the binary content

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Labels: EasyFix

Comment #12 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to  
differentiate the binary content

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3715 in reviewboard: markdown_utils.py line 241, in iter_markdown_lines i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'instance' and 'int'

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard


Comment #2 on issue 3715 by mami...@gmail.com: markdown_utils.py line 241,  
in iter_markdown_lines  i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for  
+=: 'instance' and 'int'

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3715

To allow us to see the review in the web GUI I added this code right after  
the i += 1 line.



/local/ichnaea_conf/site/python_ve/reviewboard_v2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews
diff markdown_utils.py markdown_utils.py.orig
231,232d230
 if not isinstance(i, int):
 i = 1

In this review it seems they cut and pasted the all the test cases and the  
results of each test.  Maybe there was special chars or something in the  
description.


-Marvin

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3687 in reviewboard: rbt - helpful error message when repository cannot be found

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Labels: EasyFix Component-RBTools

Comment #1 on issue 3687 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt - helpful error message  
when repository cannot be found

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3687

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Always being prompted for password with rbt post

2015-01-12 Thread Christian Hammond
Do you have to log into the web UI frequently as well, or is it just with 
RBTools?

Would you be able to find out what authentication mechanism is being used on 
Review Board? LDAP, Active Directory, etc.?

Any idea if anybody else is having this problem there?

It sort of sounds like the session is expiring too soon on the server, or isn't 
retrievable after use, as if it's not actually being stored.

Christian

--  
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com  
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org  
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

-Original Message-
From: David Resnick abune...@gmail.com
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Date: January 11, 2015 at 11:43:31 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject:  Re: Always being prompted for password with rbt post

 Writable and seemingly updated each time I use rbt.
  
 $ cat ~/.rbtools-cookies
 # Netscape HTTP Cookie File
 # http://curl.haxx.se/rfc/cookie_spec.html
 # This is a generated file! Do not edit.
  
 reviewboard.company.com FALSE / FALSE 1451493075
 rbsessionid d6cmm1l5fcbaw50ofigpns45kio4gukh
  
 On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 11:20:59 PM UTC+2, David Trowbridge wrote:
 
  Can you check to make sure that ~/.rbtools-cookies is writable by your
  user?
 
  -David
  On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 9:28:55 AM David Resnickwrote:
 
  I've been having this problem for a while. I encountered this both on Mac
  (10.10) and Ubunu 14.04.
 
  RBTools 0.6.3, Reviewboard 2.0.10
 
  $ rbt post --debug
   RBTools 0.6.3
   Python 2.7.9 (default, Dec 19 2014, 06:00:59)
  [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 6.0 (clang-600.0.56)]
   Running on Darwin-14.0.0-x86_64-i386-64bit
   Home = /Users/username
   Current directory = /Users/username/proj/project/support
   Checking for a Subversion repository...
   Running: svn info --non-interactive
   Command exited with rc 1: ['svn', 'info', '--non-interactive']
  svn: E155007: '/Users/username/proj/project/support' is not a working copy
  ---
   Checking for a Git repository...
   Running: git rev-parse --git-dir
   Running: git config core.bare
   Running: git rev-parse --show-toplevel
   Running: git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
   Running: git config --get branch.phdl-build.merge
   Command exited with rc 1: ['git', 'config', '--get',
  'branch.phdl-build.merge']
  ---
   Running: git config --get branch.phdl-build.remote
   Command exited with rc 1: ['git', 'config', '--get',
  'branch.phdl-build.remote']
  ---
   Running: git config --get remote.origin.url
   repository info: Path: ssh://g...@git.company.com/project.git, Base
  path: , Supports changesets: False
   Making HTTP GET request to https://reviewboard.company.com/api/
 
  == HTTP Authentication Required
  Enter authorization information for Web API at reviewboard.company.com
  Password:
 
  Anything I can change locally to fix this?
 
  Thanks,
  David
 
  --
  Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
  ---
  Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
  ---
  Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  ---
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  reviewboard group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
  email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
  
 --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard  
 group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.  
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3715 in reviewboard: markdown_utils.py line 241, in iter_markdown_lines i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'instance' and 'int'

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard


Comment #3 on issue 3715 by mami...@gmail.com: markdown_utils.py line 241,  
in iter_markdown_lines  i += 1 TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for  
+=: 'instance' and 'int'

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3715

We made these changes to the code:

diff markdown_utils.py.orig markdown_utils.py
230a231,237

 try:
 print next line is out i
 print i, i.name, i.value
 i = int(i.value)
 except:
 print we went to except
 i = 1


This is the output when we access this review.

[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] next line is out i
[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] xml.dom.minidom.Attr instance at  
0x2af3e15be9e0 start 2

[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] next line is out i
[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] xml.dom.minidom.Attr instance at  
0x2af3e16346c8 start 10

[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] next line is out i
[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] xml.dom.minidom.Attr instance at  
0x2af3e1634f38 start 24

[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] next line is out i
[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] xml.dom.minidom.Attr instance at  
0x2af3e18c1560 start 25

[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] next line is out i
[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] xml.dom.minidom.Attr instance at  
0x2af3e18d32d8 start 27

[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] next line is out i
[Mon Jan 12 21:42:20 2015] [error] xml.dom.minidom.Attr instance at  
0x2af3e19040e0 start 26


I hope this helps.

-Marvin
512-423-3542

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3716 in reviewboard: Diff crashing with non-utf8 characters

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: trowb...@gmail.com
Labels: Component-SCMTools

Comment #2 on issue 3716 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff crashing with non-utf8  
characters

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3716

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Issue 3716 in reviewboard: Diff crashing with non-utf8 characters

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 3716 by msu...@aurea.com: Diff crashing with non-utf8 characters
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3716

*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be
*** rejected.
***
*** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially
to
*** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug
*** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release.
***
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
***
*** If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
***
*** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other
information
*** that you include has been stripped of confidential information.


What version are you running?
2.0.12


What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Any URL that involves a diff on files containing non-utf8 characters.


What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create new review request.
2. Browse repo
3. Create a review from an existing change.
4. The new review page does not come up with the diff information.
5. The problem is also reproducible when uploading a patch file.


What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The patch and diff files, etc should be processed based on the encoding  
configured on the repository advanced settings in reviewboard. In this  
case, the advanced setting was configured to: ISO-8859-1



What operating system are you using? What browser?
Server is running on Amazon Linux. Latest Version.
Browser is Google Chrome latest version.


Please provide any additional information below.

The files checked into Subversion do not have any svn:mime-type properties  
set so relying on this reviewboard advanced setting to specify the  
character encoding.


The specific character that is causing a problem is: é
This character is encoded as E9 in ISO-8859-1, which is how it appears in  
the repository or svn diff file.

But as C3 A9 in UTF-8, which is why review board gets confused.


The error from the logs:

23:12:21ERROR   
 - Failed to generate diff using pysvn for revisions 14128:14129 for path  
https://subversion.devfactory.com/repos/AureaGCE_Generix: 'utf8' codec  
can't decode byte 0xe9 in position 534: invalid continuation byte

Traceback (most recent call last):
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/pysvn.py,  
line 269, in diff

diff_options=['-u']).decode('utf-8')
  File /usr/lib64/python2.6/encodings/utf_8.py, line 16, in decode
return codecs.utf_8_decode(input, errors, True)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xe9 in position 534:  
invalid continuation byte

23:12:21ERROR   
 - Unable to update new review request from commit ID 14129: Unable to get  
diff revisions 14128 through 14129: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xe9 in  
position 534: invalid continuation byte

Traceback (most recent call last):
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/managers.py,  
line 146, in create

review_request.update_from_commit_id(commit_id)
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/models/base_review_request_details.py,  
line 195, in update_from_commit_id

self.update_from_committed_change(commit_id)
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/models/base_review_request_details.py,  
line 243, in update_from_committed_change

commit = self.repository.get_change(commit_id)
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py,  
line 435, in get_change

return self.get_scmtool().get_change(revision)
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/__init__.py,  
line 221, in get_change

raise self.normalize_error(e)
   
File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/__init__.py,  
line 312, in normalize_error

raise SCMError(e)
SCMError: Unable to get diff revisions 14128 through 14129: 'utf8' codec  
can't decode byte 0xe9 in position 534: invalid continuation byte


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: How to link github account on RB 2.0.11

2015-01-12 Thread Tamer Afify
Hi Christian,

Do I understand from this response that there is no way for RB to support 
code review for GitHub Enterprise (github.companyname.com) without buying 
the power pack? or RB can't support a Git repo with HTTPS protocol?
If it is supported can you provide help on how to add a  GitHub Enterprise 
repository?


On Monday, November 17, 2014 at 5:06:04 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:

 I know you're using GitLab now, but as an FYI, the built-in GitHub support 
 in Review Board is only for github.com. GitHub Enterprise support is 
 available through Power Pack (https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/) 

 Christian 

 --   
 Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript:   
 Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org   
 Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com 

 -Original Message- 
 From: MoonWalker daniel.c...@gmail.com javascript: 
 Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript: 
 Date: November 17, 2014 at 2:33:44 PM 
 To: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript: 
 Subject:  Re: How to link github account on RB 2.0.11 

  Thanks David for your replay. I was using the enterprise edition, but I 
 had 
  so many issue, so I decide to use GitLab instead. Unfortunately I have 
 some 
  issues there as well. More details 
  here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/2mO2CjYetdE 

  On Monday, November 17, 2014 1:19:17 PM UTC+11, David Trowbridge wrote: 
   
   Selecting GitHub means github.com. Are you using GitHub enterprise? 
   
   -david 
   
   On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:16 PM, MoonWalkerwrote: 
   
   both RB and GitHub are local servers (no internet access) 
   
   On Monday, November 17, 2014 12:55:11 PM UTC+11, David Trowbridge 
 wrote: 
   
   It looks like we have some problems with the error handling, but 
 there's 
   some issue attempting to communicate with GitHub's API. Does this 
 machine 
   have access to the internet? Is it possible that you need to 
 configure an 
   HTTP proxy? 
   
   -David 
   
   On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:28 PM, MoonWalker   
   wrote: 
   
   I we have a private GitHub repo and I am trying to connect to my RB 
   2.0.11. I noticed that the Account option shows Link a new 
 account but 
   seems like the account is not linked. How shall I link the github 
 account? 
   
   Please take a look at my screen shoot. 
   
   P.S this user has admin rights 
   
   
   
   
 
   
   -- 
   Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ 
   powerpack/ 
   --- 
   Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/ 
   --- 
   Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
   --- 
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
   Groups reviewboard group. 
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
 send 
   an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. 
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
   
   
   -- 
   Get the Review Board Power Pack at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ 
   --- 
   Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ 
   --- 
   Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
   --- 
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
   reviewboard group. 
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
 send an 
   email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . 
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
   
   
   

  -- 
  Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ 
  --- 
  Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ 
  --- 
  Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
  --- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups reviewboard   
  group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.   
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: How to link github account on RB 2.0.11

2015-01-12 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Tamer,

This is correct. You need Power Pack to talk to GitHub Enterprise.

Git's protocols are all too limiting to be used in a remote fashion the way 
code review tools typically need without some sort of wrapper (GitWeb or, 
preferably, a complete API). This is what GitHub and GitHub Enterprise both 
provide.

Once Power Pack is installed, all you need to do is select GitHub Enterprise 
when configuring a repository. In future versions of Review Board and Power 
Pack, we're going to have better integration to support automatically managing 
repositories on Review Board when they change on GitHub Enterprise.

Christian

--  
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com  
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org  
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

-Original Message-
From: Tamer Afify tamer.af...@gmail.com
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Date: January 12, 2015 at 5:46:26 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Cc: daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com, 
christ...@beanbaginc.com christ...@beanbaginc.com
Subject:  Re: How to link github account on RB 2.0.11

 Hi Christian,
  
 Do I understand from this response that there is no way for RB to support
 code review for GitHub Enterprise (github.companyname.com) without buying
 the power pack? or RB can't support a Git repo with HTTPS protocol?
 If it is supported can you provide help on how to add a GitHub Enterprise
 repository?
  
  
 On Monday, November 17, 2014 at 5:06:04 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
 
  I know you're using GitLab now, but as an FYI, the built-in GitHub support
  in Review Board is only for github.com. GitHub Enterprise support is
  available through Power Pack (https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/)
 
  Christian
 
  --
  Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com  
  Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
  Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: MoonWalker 
  Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com   
  Date: November 17, 2014 at 2:33:44 PM
  To: revie...@googlegroups.com   
  Subject: Re: How to link github account on RB 2.0.11
 
   Thanks David for your replay. I was using the enterprise edition, but I
  had
   so many issue, so I decide to use GitLab instead. Unfortunately I have
  some
   issues there as well. More details
   here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/2mO2CjYetdE
  
   On Monday, November 17, 2014 1:19:17 PM UTC+11, David Trowbridge wrote:
   
Selecting GitHub means github.com. Are you using GitHub enterprise?
   
-david
   
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:16 PM, MoonWalkerwrote:
   
both RB and GitHub are local servers (no internet access)
   
On Monday, November 17, 2014 12:55:11 PM UTC+11, David Trowbridge
  wrote:
   
It looks like we have some problems with the error handling, but
  there's
some issue attempting to communicate with GitHub's API. Does this
  machine
have access to the internet? Is it possible that you need to
  configure an
HTTP proxy?
   
-David
   
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:28 PM, MoonWalker
wrote:
   
I we have a private GitHub repo and I am trying to connect to my RB
2.0.11. I noticed that the Account option shows Link a new
  account but
seems like the account is not linked. How shall I link the github
  account?
   
Please take a look at my screen shoot.
   
P.S this user has admin rights
   
   
   
   
   
   
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/
powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons:
  https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
  send
an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
   
   
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
  http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
  send an
email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
   
   
   
  
   --
   Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
   ---
   Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
   ---
   Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
   ---
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups reviewboard
   group.
   To unsubscribe from this group 

Re: Certificate issue during installation on Linux (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) using easy_install with python2.6

2015-01-12 Thread rahul emmatty
That worked. Thanks a lot.

-Rahul

On Saturday, 10 January 2015 07:38:36 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:

 You can upgrade it using easy_install: 

 sudo easy_install -U setuptools 

 Christian 

 --   
 Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript:   
 Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org   
 Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com 

 -Original Message- 
 From: rahul emmatty rahul...@gmail.com javascript: 
 Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript: 
 Date: January 9, 2015 at 5:31:45 AM 
 To: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript: 
 Cc: rahul...@gmail.com javascript: rahul...@gmail.com javascript:, 
 chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: 

 Subject:  Re: Certificate issue during installation on Linux (SUSE Linux 
 Enterprise Server) using easy_install with python2.6 

  Hi Christian, 

  Thanks for the quick reply. I am afraid not. The latest available 
  officially supported  installed version for python-setuptools package 
 in 
  SLES11-SP3 is 0.6c8 as of now. :( 
  It would be great if there are some workaround. 

  Regards, 
  Rahul 


  On Friday, 9 January 2015 15:36:11 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: 
   
   Hi Rahul, 
   
   hmm, that's concerning. It does look to be an older version of 
 setuptools, 
   though. Could you try installing 0.6c9 or higher? 
   
   Christian 
   
   -- 
   Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com   
   Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org 
   Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com 
   
   -Original Message- 
   From: rahul emmatty  
   Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com
   Date: January 9, 2015 at 12:16:06 AM 
   To: revie...@googlegroups.com
   Subject: Certificate issue during installation on Linux (SUSE Linux 
   Enterprise Server) using easy_install with python2.6 
   
I am receiving the following certificate error during install.Please 
   find 
the trace 

# easy_install ReviewBoard 

from md5 import md5 
Searching for ReviewBoard 
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ 
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ 
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ 
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ 
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ 
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/ 
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ 
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ 
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.0/ 
Reading http://www.review-board.org/ 
Traceback (most recent call last): 
File /usr/local/bin/easy_install, line 8, in 
load_entry_point('setuptools==0.6c8', 'console_scripts', 
'easy_install')() 
File 

 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,   
   
line 1678, in main 
with_ei_usage(lambda: 
File 

 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,   
   
line 1666, in with_ei_usage 
return f() 
File 

 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,   
   
line 1682, in 
distclass=DistributionWithoutHelpCommands, **kw 
File /usr/lib64/python2.6/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup 
dist.run_commands() 
File /usr/lib64/python2.6/distutils/dist.py, line 975, in 
 run_commands 
self.run_command(cmd) 
File /usr/lib64/python2.6/distutils/dist.py, line 995, in 
 run_command 
cmd_obj.run() 
File 

 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,   
   
line 211, in run 
self.easy_install(spec, not self.no_deps) 
File 

 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,   
   
line 440, in easy_install 
spec, tmpdir, self.upgrade, self.editable, not self.always_copy 
File 
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/package_index.py,   
line 463, in fetch_distribution 
self.find_packages(requirement) 
File 
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/package_index.py,   
line 304, in find_packages 
self.scan_url(self.index_url + requirement.unsafe_name+'/') 
File 
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/package_index.py,   
line 617, in scan_url 
self.process_url(url, True) 
File 
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/package_index.py,   
line 202, in process_url 
page = self.process_index(url, page) 
File 
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/package_index.py,   
line 279, in process_index 
self.scan_url(new_url) 
File 
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setuptools/package_index.py,   
line 617, in scan_url 
self.process_url(url, True) 
File 
 

Re: Exception on RB 1.7.5

2015-01-12 Thread Nilesh Jaiswal
Thanks David,

I have read the document about the deprecation of mod_python. Could you
please help me know if this error create any issue in future, considering
we stick to mod_python and RB release version 1.7.5 ( which still support
mod_python) and the error message we see would cause incorrect behavior of
Review Board.

If we want to move to mod_wsgi what all changes we need to follow, do we
have any documentation regarding the same, if yes then please point me so
that i can follow the procedure.

Since this error coming in our production server we want to double sure
before doing any changes.

Thanks,
Nilesh


On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:53 AM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com
wrote:

 It looks like there's a problem with your mod_python.

 mod_python is deprecated and unmaintained. The recommended way to deploy
 Python applications with Apache (including Review Board) is mod_wsgi.

 -David

 On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 7:36:32 AM Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am using RB version 1.7.5, I see exception in the error.log.

 I am wanted to know if this is harmful for the application?
 How to fix it?

 please advise and help

   except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 02:46:14 2015] [notice] child pid 10900 exit signal Aborted
 (6)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
 DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
 FastCGI server instead.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
   _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to
 avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
 DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
 STATIC_URL instead.
   use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
 `supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
 class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/defaulttags.py:1235:
 DeprecationWarning: The syntax for the url template tag is changing. Load
 the `url` tag from the `future` tag library to start using the new behavior.
   category=DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py:1550:
 DeprecationWarning: catching of string exceptions is deprecated
   except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 02:50:56 2015] [notice] child pid 13222 exit signal Aborted
 (6)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
 DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
 FastCGI server instead.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
   _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to
 avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
 DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
 STATIC_URL instead.
   use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
 `supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
 class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   

Re: Exception on RB 1.7.5

2015-01-12 Thread David Trowbridge
Nilesh,

I can't comment about whether it will cause serious problems beyond the
warning, because I don't know. However, it looks scary and I wouldn't be
surprised if you have issues or corruption.

As far as migrating to mod_wsgi, I'd suggest doing a deployment of Review
Board on a new server and then comparing the configurations. There's no
document that we've written but there's probably plenty out on the internet
about switching to wsgi.

-David
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:36 PM Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks David,

 I have read the document about the deprecation of mod_python. Could you
 please help me know if this error create any issue in future, considering
 we stick to mod_python and RB release version 1.7.5 ( which still support
 mod_python) and the error message we see would cause incorrect behavior of
 Review Board.

 If we want to move to mod_wsgi what all changes we need to follow, do we
 have any documentation regarding the same, if yes then please point me so
 that i can follow the procedure.

 Since this error coming in our production server we want to double sure
 before doing any changes.

 Thanks,
 Nilesh


 On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:53 AM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 It looks like there's a problem with your mod_python.

 mod_python is deprecated and unmaintained. The recommended way to deploy
 Python applications with Apache (including Review Board) is mod_wsgi.

 -David

 On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 7:36:32 AM Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am using RB version 1.7.5, I see exception in the error.log.

 I am wanted to know if this is harmful for the application?
 How to fix it?

 please advise and help

   except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 02:46:14 2015] [notice] child pid 10900 exit signal Aborted
 (6)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
 DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
 FastCGI server instead.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
   _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5
 to avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
 DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
 STATIC_URL instead.
   use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: Authentication backends without a
 `supports_inactive_user` attribute are deprecated. Please define it in
 class 'reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend'.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/simple.py:8:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/defaulttags.py:1235:
 DeprecationWarning: The syntax for the url template tag is changing. Load
 the `url` tag from the `future` tag library to start using the new behavior.
   category=DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py:1550:
 DeprecationWarning: catching of string exceptions is deprecated
   except apache.PROG_TRACEBACK, traceblock:
 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state
 [Mon Jan 12 02:50:56 2015] [notice] child pid 13222 exit signal Aborted
 (6)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/modpython.py:131:
 DeprecationWarning: The mod_python handler is deprecated; use a WSGI or
 FastCGI server instead.
   DeprecationWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
   _warn(Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5
 to avoid timing attack vulnerability., PowmInsecureWarning)
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
   DeprecationWarning
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75:
 DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use
 STATIC_URL instead.
 

Re: Issue 3555 in reviewboard: ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token) when browsing to review

2015-01-12 Thread reviewboard


Comment #4 on issue 3555 by mami...@gmail.com: ExpatError: not well-formed  
(invalid token) when browsing to review

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3555

I am going to open a new issue since this one is closed.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Something broke! (Error 500) in dashboard page

2015-01-12 Thread xfwangcheers
Hello 

I have a clean install of v2.0.11 and everything seems well in the admin 
UI. but when I (as the default admin account) go to the 
http://reviews.example.com/dashboard/, I get the following error:

Something broke! (Error 500) 

It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either a 
bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please report this to 
your administrator. 

and the following error can be found in the log file:

and I create a new account and have got the same error. 

and I notice if the user post a review quest and then go to 
http://reviews.example.com/dashboard/, it works!!! 

It seems to happen if the user have no any review request. 

2015-01-12 13:27:52,851 - ERROR -  - Exception thrown for user admin at 
http://reviews.example.com/dashboard/

get() returned more than one LocalSiteProfile -- it returned 2!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py, 
line 112, in get_response
response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
  File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/auth/decorators.py, line 
22, in _wrapped_view
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/site/decorators.py, 
line 35, in _check
return view_func(request, local_site=local_site, *args, **kwargs)
  File 
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py, line 
44, in _check_valid_prefs
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/datagrids/views.py, 
line 58, in dashboard
grid = DashboardDataGrid(request, local_site=local_site)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/datagrids/grids.py, 
line 204, in __init__
profile=self.profile)[0]
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py, line 
154, in get_or_create
return self.get_queryset().get_or_create(**kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py, line 
376, in get_or_create
return self.get(**lookup), False
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py, line 
313, in get
(self.model._meta.object_name, num))
MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one LocalSiteProfile -- 
it returned 2!

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Review Board displays incorrectly

2015-01-12 Thread Justin Palmer
 1) yum install memcached; systemctl start memcached

I did do this on CentOS 7. On CentOS 6, I even built 1.4.22 from source.

$ ps -ef | grep memcached
memcach+  1070 1  0 Jan05 ?00:00:19 /usr/bin/memcached -u 
memcached -p 11211 -m 64 -c 1024

 2)... 3) setsebool...

I disabled SELinux, so this shouldn't matter.

 4) ln -s apache-wsgi.conf...

On CentOS 6, there is no conf.modules.d directory. All conf.d files are 
included right after the LoadModule section. This means that LoadModule 
wsgi_module in conf.d/wsgi.conf may not happen before 
conf.d/reviewboard.conf. That's why I appended the include at the end. I 
did move Include apache-wsgi.conf to the line after Include 
confd.d/*.conf. Review Board still doesn't display correctly.

I'm glad you were able to deploy from minimum CentOS 7. I wish I knew 
what's different about my deployment.



On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 9:11:30 AM UTC-6, Stephen Gallagher wrote:




 On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 07:02 -0800, Justin Palmer wrote: 
  I installed CentOS 7 on a new VM, this time choosing Development and 
  Creative Workstation along with several packages known to be 
  required. This time, Review Board displays correctly. So I'm fairly 
  confident there is a dependency problem of some sort. If I have time, 
  I'm going to start comparing package lists. 


 Interesting, I just installed it from a minimal CentOS 7 installation 
 just now as well. I followed most of your steps as listed earlier except 
 for four additional ones. 

 1) yum install memcached; systemctl start memcached 
 I don't know if you were using a memcached server on another machine, 
 but if you used the defaults (localhost:11211), then you need to add 
 this manually. Memcached isn't a strict dependency because it doesn't 
 need to be running on the local machine. In Ubuntu terms, we might call 
 this a suggests dependency, but we don't have those in Fedora. Only 
 strict deps at the moment. 

 2) setsebool -P httpd_can_network_memcache on 
 Make sure SELinux allows apache to contact the local memcached server 

 3) setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect_db on 
 Make sure SELinux allows apache to contact the local postgresql server 

 4) Instead of 
 echo Include apache-wsgi.conf  httpd.conf 
 I instead did 
 ln -s \ 
 /var/lib/reviewboard/sites/reviewboard.c7.sgallagh.rht/conf/apache-wsgi.conf 

 /etc/httpd/conf.d/reviewboard-reviewboard.c7.sgallagh.rht.conf 

 This should be functionally identical, though it's *possible* that the 
 merge happens differently. 


 2) and 3) are probably irrelevant since you said you weren't using 
 SELinux. My best guess is that your issues above were due to not having 
 a running memcached server. Everything is working fine for me. 




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.