Re: Issue 489 in reviewboard: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard


Comment #43 on issue 489 by csipak.a...@ardinsys.eu: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT  
button

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489

@pvgodd: looks like this issue got forgotten.

Last time it was touched by a project member, it was bound to the 1.8  
milestone (after it was repeatedly postponed through every big version  
milestonse earlier). 1.8 never came, version number went straight to 2.0,  
which didn't contain the new feature. It is also missing from the release  
notes of 2.5 Beta 1.


BTW, there's another feature request targeting the ship it function, but in  
a less complicated manner, see issue 3462.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 489 in reviewboard: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard


Comment #44 on issue 489 by trowb...@gmail.com: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489

It's not forgotten, just that this is a relatively tricky thing (literally  
everyone has an opinion about how ship-its should be improved/changed and  
whatever we do has to be very carefully thought out) and we have fairly  
limited resources.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium

New issue 3863 by csipak.a...@ardinsys.eu: Web API should provide an id  
field for a review request's every depends_on entry

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863

What version are you running?

2.0.15

What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any?

http://demo.reviewboard.org/api/review-requests/

Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it.

Currently if I query review requests either via review_requests or  
review_requests/review_request_id Web API resource, depends_on data  
appears in the response like this:


depends_on: [ {
   href: http://adsrv2/reviewboard/api/review-requests/51/;,
   method: GET,
   title: blah-blah-blah
}],

If I want to query a review request's depends_on ids, I can:

a) Implement a hack, and use substring on the href field. This is not only  
unelegant, but also violates a principle stated in the first chapter of the  
Web API documentation  
(https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/webapi/2.0/overview/#resource-urls).


b) Launch another GET request using the href field, and get the id from the  
response. Suppose my review requests has got two dozen depends_on  
references, I will have to do two dozen separate calls to get a couple of  
characters worth of result per response payload. Not really elegant, nor  
efficient.


There should be an id field within every depends_on element. Example:

depends_on: [ {
   id: 51,
   href: http://adsrv2/reviewboard/api/review-requests/51/;,
   method: GET,
   title: blah-blah-blah
}],


What operating system are you using? What browser?

Windows 7
Firefox

Please provide any additional information below.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue after ReviewBoard upgrade

2015-05-06 Thread Papaswede


Ok, I tried that and that got rid of one of the error messages (the one 
that was referencing an invalid path), but the other two are still there, 
and those two messages do reference a valid path.


https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-t-njvjcyzEg/VUp7pYZL5ZI/ALE/1p4V_TYGWkg/s1600/Manual_server_updates_required___Review_Board.pngThat
 
is what I'm seeing right now. Those two paths are accessible and valid, and 
I tried running the suggested command to update the permissions, but no 
luck. I've tried a bunch of different combinations of permissions on those 
folders, but nothing seems to work.


On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:50:39 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 If this is a copy of the database, and not a reference to the original 
 database, then you can use the commands in my prior e-mail to fix up the 
 path. It'll modify the settings stored in the database to reference the new 
 paths you specify. After you do that, you can restart Apache, and it should 
 begin to work.

 The rest of what you're doing sounds fine, as far as I can tell.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com 
 javascript: wrote:

 Ah, well maybe that is the issue then. Ok, so let me ask if I need to go 
 about this a different way. We currently have reviewboard running on an 
 old, antiquated box. I had them set up a new VM for me that I am migrating 
 reviewboard to. I can't install reviewboard in the same location on this 
 new VM because they gave me a local directory to use and I have to build 
 everything from scratch. So, I built apache, MySQL and all the 
 dependencies. I also installed the most recent version of Reviewboard. 
 However, I wanted to keep the data from the old reviewboard server, so I 
 did a MySQL backup and restored that backup on the new VM. I also 
 compressed the old reviewboard site and moved that over to the VM and 
 unzipped it. After this I ran the rb-site upgrade command since the version 
 of reviewboard on the new VM is the most recent version whereas we were a 
 number of versions behind on the old box. In the past I've never moved 
 reviewboard from one server to another, so perhaps the way I'm going about 
 this is fundamentally flawed. Is there a better way to install reviewboard 
 from scratch yet still take all of the data from another reviewboard 
 installation and restore it?

 Hopefully all of that makes sense.


 On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 If the path is referencing an incorrect directory, then it sounds like 
 you may be using a database originally installed in a different path. You 
 can verify this by typing:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site list-siteconfig

 That will show you all your configured site settings, some of which will 
 have a path. You can change those paths from the command line through:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site set-siteconfig -- --key=key 
 --value=new_value

 Note the -- before the flags. That's important.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yeah, I've tried various combinations of permissions and always 
 restarting apache after I make changes. I'm a bit stuck here as the error 
 messages do not make any sense to me.

 On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:47:00 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Have you tried restarting the web server (apache)?

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12 AM Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've upgraded my ReviewBoard site and am now getting the errors in 
 the attached screenshot. The first and last errors don't make sense to 
 me, 
 because /var/reviewboard/ is not the location of my reviewboard 
 installation. It's located in /opt/local/revboard/reviewboard. As far as 
 the other error messages go, I've done what they ask me to do, but 
 they're 
 still showing up, so I'm not sure what to do there. I've verified that 
 the 
 directories exist and have the correct permissions.


  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
 send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! 

Re: Case of the strange disappearing diff

2015-05-06 Thread Christian Hammond
Hey Andrew,

By any chance, this file that went missing.. was it a modification of a
newly-introduced file not yet pushed upstream? So, something like:


o -- MYFILE is modified
|
o -- MYFILE is newly created
|
o master
|


Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Andrew MacLeod freea...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have one user who posts a diff from a git workspace. The diff appears on
 RB for a few minutes
 and then disappears just showing the This is an empty file display.
 Reviews in other workspaces
 work as expected (ie. don't go missing)

 I am unable to reproduce using the downloaded diff in my own workspace. My
 review continues to show the diff.

 So far I have tried:
   + Looking for any error messages in the logs. There is nothing
   + Restarting memcached and RB in case there is some strange cache issue

 Using Review Board 2.0.11 and rbt 0.6.2

 Any thoughts on what else to look for? Thanks,

 -amac

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue after ReviewBoard upgrade

2015-05-06 Thread Papaswede
The webserver is actually running as the apache user. 

We are using Oracle Enterprise Linux 6, and SELinux is enabled. I had to 
get our IT department to make some changes to SELinux while installing 
MySQL and Apache. Are there any known things that I should check with 
regards to SELinux that I can relay to them?

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 5:09:17 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Looks like your web server is running as root, which is bad. It really 
 should be using its own dedicated user.

 That's not the source of the problem, but it's something to be aware of.

 What Linux distro are you using? Any chance SELinux is enabled? If so, 
 that can cause this.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com javascript:
  wrote:

 Ok, I tried that and that got rid of one of the error messages (the one 
 that was referencing an invalid path), but the other two are still there, 
 and those two messages do reference a valid path.



 https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-t-njvjcyzEg/VUp7pYZL5ZI/ALE/1p4V_TYGWkg/s1600/Manual_server_updates_required___Review_Board.pngThat
  
 is what I'm seeing right now. Those two paths are accessible and valid, 
 and I tried running the suggested command to update the permissions, but no 
 luck. I've tried a bunch of different combinations of permissions on those 
 folders, but nothing seems to work.


 On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:50:39 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 If this is a copy of the database, and not a reference to the original 
 database, then you can use the commands in my prior e-mail to fix up the 
 path. It'll modify the settings stored in the database to reference the new 
 paths you specify. After you do that, you can restart Apache, and it should 
 begin to work.

 The rest of what you're doing sounds fine, as far as I can tell.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ah, well maybe that is the issue then. Ok, so let me ask if I need to 
 go about this a different way. We currently have reviewboard running on an 
 old, antiquated box. I had them set up a new VM for me that I am migrating 
 reviewboard to. I can't install reviewboard in the same location on this 
 new VM because they gave me a local directory to use and I have to build 
 everything from scratch. So, I built apache, MySQL and all the 
 dependencies. I also installed the most recent version of Reviewboard. 
 However, I wanted to keep the data from the old reviewboard server, so I 
 did a MySQL backup and restored that backup on the new VM. I also 
 compressed the old reviewboard site and moved that over to the VM and 
 unzipped it. After this I ran the rb-site upgrade command since the 
 version 
 of reviewboard on the new VM is the most recent version whereas we were a 
 number of versions behind on the old box. In the past I've never moved 
 reviewboard from one server to another, so perhaps the way I'm going about 
 this is fundamentally flawed. Is there a better way to install reviewboard 
 from scratch yet still take all of the data from another reviewboard 
 installation and restore it?

 Hopefully all of that makes sense.


 On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 If the path is referencing an incorrect directory, then it sounds like 
 you may be using a database originally installed in a different path. You 
 can verify this by typing:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site list-siteconfig

 That will show you all your configured site settings, some of which 
 will have a path. You can change those paths from the command line 
 through:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site set-siteconfig -- --key=key 
 --value=new_value

 Note the -- before the flags. That's important.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yeah, I've tried various combinations of permissions and always 
 restarting apache after I make changes. I'm a bit stuck here as the 
 error 
 messages do not make any sense to me.

 On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:47:00 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge 
 wrote:

 Have you tried restarting the web server (apache)?

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12 AM Papaswede papa...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

 I've upgraded my ReviewBoard site and am now getting the errors in 
 the attached screenshot. The first and last errors don't make sense to 
 me, 
 because /var/reviewboard/ is not the location of my reviewboard 
 installation. It's located in /opt/local/revboard/reviewboard. As far 
 as 
 the other error messages go, I've done 

Case of the strange disappearing diff

2015-05-06 Thread Andrew MacLeod
I have one user who posts a diff from a git workspace. The diff appears on 
RB for a few minutes 
and then disappears just showing the This is an empty file display. 
Reviews in other workspaces
work as expected (ie. don't go missing)

I am unable to reproduce using the downloaded diff in my own workspace. My 
review continues to show the diff.

So far I have tried:
  + Looking for any error messages in the logs. There is nothing
  + Restarting memcached and RB in case there is some strange cache issue

Using Review Board 2.0.11 and rbt 0.6.2

Any thoughts on what else to look for? Thanks,

-amac

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue after ReviewBoard upgrade

2015-05-06 Thread Papaswede
Ah, your last message caused me to dig some more, and I was able to find 
the issue. Apache was running the child processes as the wrong user and 
they did therefore not have access to the directories the way they should. 
So, it was a misconfiguration in my httpd.conf.

Thanks!

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-4, Papaswede wrote:

 The webserver is actually running as the apache user. 

 We are using Oracle Enterprise Linux 6, and SELinux is enabled. I had to 
 get our IT department to make some changes to SELinux while installing 
 MySQL and Apache. Are there any known things that I should check with 
 regards to SELinux that I can relay to them?

 On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 5:09:17 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Looks like your web server is running as root, which is bad. It really 
 should be using its own dedicated user.

 That's not the source of the problem, but it's something to be aware of.

 What Linux distro are you using? Any chance SELinux is enabled? If so, 
 that can cause this.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ok, I tried that and that got rid of one of the error messages (the one 
 that was referencing an invalid path), but the other two are still there, 
 and those two messages do reference a valid path.



 https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-t-njvjcyzEg/VUp7pYZL5ZI/ALE/1p4V_TYGWkg/s1600/Manual_server_updates_required___Review_Board.pngThat
  
 is what I'm seeing right now. Those two paths are accessible and valid, 
 and I tried running the suggested command to update the permissions, but no 
 luck. I've tried a bunch of different combinations of permissions on those 
 folders, but nothing seems to work.


 On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:50:39 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 If this is a copy of the database, and not a reference to the original 
 database, then you can use the commands in my prior e-mail to fix up the 
 path. It'll modify the settings stored in the database to reference the 
 new 
 paths you specify. After you do that, you can restart Apache, and it 
 should 
 begin to work.

 The rest of what you're doing sounds fine, as far as I can tell.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ah, well maybe that is the issue then. Ok, so let me ask if I need to 
 go about this a different way. We currently have reviewboard running on 
 an 
 old, antiquated box. I had them set up a new VM for me that I am 
 migrating 
 reviewboard to. I can't install reviewboard in the same location on this 
 new VM because they gave me a local directory to use and I have to 
 build 
 everything from scratch. So, I built apache, MySQL and all the 
 dependencies. I also installed the most recent version of Reviewboard. 
 However, I wanted to keep the data from the old reviewboard server, so I 
 did a MySQL backup and restored that backup on the new VM. I also 
 compressed the old reviewboard site and moved that over to the VM and 
 unzipped it. After this I ran the rb-site upgrade command since the 
 version 
 of reviewboard on the new VM is the most recent version whereas we were a 
 number of versions behind on the old box. In the past I've never moved 
 reviewboard from one server to another, so perhaps the way I'm going 
 about 
 this is fundamentally flawed. Is there a better way to install 
 reviewboard 
 from scratch yet still take all of the data from another reviewboard 
 installation and restore it?

 Hopefully all of that makes sense.


 On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 If the path is referencing an incorrect directory, then it sounds 
 like you may be using a database originally installed in a different 
 path. 
 You can verify this by typing:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site list-siteconfig

 That will show you all your configured site settings, some of which 
 will have a path. You can change those paths from the command line 
 through:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site set-siteconfig -- --key=key 
 --value=new_value

 Note the -- before the flags. That's important.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yeah, I've tried various combinations of permissions and always 
 restarting apache after I make changes. I'm a bit stuck here as the 
 error 
 messages do not make any sense to me.

 On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:47:00 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge 
 wrote:

 Have you tried restarting the web server (apache)?

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12 AM Papaswede papa...@gmail.com 

Re: Issue after ReviewBoard upgrade

2015-05-06 Thread Christian Hammond
Looks like your web server is running as root, which is bad. It really
should be using its own dedicated user.

That's not the source of the problem, but it's something to be aware of.

What Linux distro are you using? Any chance SELinux is enabled? If so, that
can cause this.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Papaswede papasw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ok, I tried that and that got rid of one of the error messages (the one
 that was referencing an invalid path), but the other two are still there,
 and those two messages do reference a valid path.



 https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-t-njvjcyzEg/VUp7pYZL5ZI/ALE/1p4V_TYGWkg/s1600/Manual_server_updates_required___Review_Board.pngThat
 is what I'm seeing right now. Those two paths are accessible and valid,
 and I tried running the suggested command to update the permissions, but no
 luck. I've tried a bunch of different combinations of permissions on those
 folders, but nothing seems to work.


 On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:50:39 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 If this is a copy of the database, and not a reference to the original
 database, then you can use the commands in my prior e-mail to fix up the
 path. It'll modify the settings stored in the database to reference the new
 paths you specify. After you do that, you can restart Apache, and it should
 begin to work.

 The rest of what you're doing sounds fine, as far as I can tell.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ah, well maybe that is the issue then. Ok, so let me ask if I need to go
 about this a different way. We currently have reviewboard running on an
 old, antiquated box. I had them set up a new VM for me that I am migrating
 reviewboard to. I can't install reviewboard in the same location on this
 new VM because they gave me a local directory to use and I have to build
 everything from scratch. So, I built apache, MySQL and all the
 dependencies. I also installed the most recent version of Reviewboard.
 However, I wanted to keep the data from the old reviewboard server, so I
 did a MySQL backup and restored that backup on the new VM. I also
 compressed the old reviewboard site and moved that over to the VM and
 unzipped it. After this I ran the rb-site upgrade command since the version
 of reviewboard on the new VM is the most recent version whereas we were a
 number of versions behind on the old box. In the past I've never moved
 reviewboard from one server to another, so perhaps the way I'm going about
 this is fundamentally flawed. Is there a better way to install reviewboard
 from scratch yet still take all of the data from another reviewboard
 installation and restore it?

 Hopefully all of that makes sense.


 On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 If the path is referencing an incorrect directory, then it sounds like
 you may be using a database originally installed in a different path. You
 can verify this by typing:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site list-siteconfig

 That will show you all your configured site settings, some of which
 will have a path. You can change those paths from the command line through:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site set-siteconfig -- --key=key
 --value=new_value

 Note the -- before the flags. That's important.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yeah, I've tried various combinations of permissions and always
 restarting apache after I make changes. I'm a bit stuck here as the error
 messages do not make any sense to me.

 On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:47:00 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge
 wrote:

 Have you tried restarting the web server (apache)?

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12 AM Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've upgraded my ReviewBoard site and am now getting the errors in
 the attached screenshot. The first and last errors don't make sense to 
 me,
 because /var/reviewboard/ is not the location of my reviewboard
 installation. It's located in /opt/local/revboard/reviewboard. As far as
 the other error messages go, I've done what they ask me to do, but 
 they're
 still showing up, so I'm not sure what to do there. I've verified that 
 the
 directories exist and have the correct permissions.


  --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the 

Issue 3865 in reviewboard: rbt post fails when random repository is misconfigured in reviewboard

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 3865 by jonathan...@gmail.com: rbt post fails when random  
repository is misconfigured in reviewboard

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3865

What version are you running?
rbtools 0.7.2
reviewboard 2.0.6


What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
https://reviewboard/api/repositories/2/info/


What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. rbt post

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expect rbt to successfully connect and post review, since web interface  
works fine.


Instead, see:
repository info: Path: https://svn-domain/svn/my_repo, Base path:  
/, Supports changesets: False

Making HTTP GET request to https://reviewboard/api/
Making HTTP GET request to https://reviewboard/api/repositories/
Making HTTP GET request to  
https://reviewboard/api/repositories/1/info/
Making HTTP GET request to  
https://reviewboard/api/repositories/2/info/
Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 500): There was an error fetching extended  
information for this repository.
Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'There was an error  
fetching extended information for this repository.', u'code': 210}}

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7.2', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/commands/main.py, line  
133, in main

command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/commands/__init__.py,  
line 555, in run_from_argv

exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/commands/post.py, line  
603, in main

repository_info = repository_info.find_server_repository_info(api_root)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/clients/svn.py, line 762,  
in find_server_repository_info

info = repository.get_info()
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/resource.py, line  
146, in lambda

self._get_url(url, **kwargs)))
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/decorators.py, line  
27, in request_method

*args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/transport/sync.py,  
line 65, in execute_request_method

return self._execute_request(request)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/transport/sync.py,  
line 74, in _execute_request

rsp = self.server.make_request(request)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/request.py, line 536,  
in make_request

self.process_error(e.code, e.read())
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbtools/api/request.py, line 509,  
in process_error

rsp['err']['msg'])
rbtools.api.errors.APIError: There was an error fetching extended  
information for this repository. (HTTP 500, API Error 210)



What operating system are you using? What browser?
Linux 4.0.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT x86_64 GNU/Linux
Chromium Version 42.0.2311.135 (64-bit)

Please provide any additional information below.
Repository #2 is an old repository that (I guess) is no longer connected to  
an SVN server, or it is misconfigured in some other way. The repository I'm  
interested in (#30), is working fine. I would expect rbt post to keep  
scanning repositories and only fail once it knows there is no match  
available.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jenkins-ReviewBot

2015-05-06 Thread Sri Ram Kannan
Hi,

I found a plugin that triggers pre-commit test through the diff files 
submitted in the ReviewBoard.

The link of the plugin is :
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins-Reviewbot

Has anyone in this group tried this with newer review board instance ?

I request to guide me on how to use it.

Regards,
Sri.


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue after ReviewBoard upgrade

2015-05-06 Thread Papaswede
Ah, well maybe that is the issue then. Ok, so let me ask if I need to go 
about this a different way. We currently have reviewboard running on an 
old, antiquated box. I had them set up a new VM for me that I am migrating 
reviewboard to. I can't install reviewboard in the same location on this 
new VM because they gave me a local directory to use and I have to build 
everything from scratch. So, I built apache, MySQL and all the 
dependencies. I also installed the most recent version of Reviewboard. 
However, I wanted to keep the data from the old reviewboard server, so I 
did a MySQL backup and restored that backup on the new VM. I also 
compressed the old reviewboard site and moved that over to the VM and 
unzipped it. After this I ran the rb-site upgrade command since the version 
of reviewboard on the new VM is the most recent version whereas we were a 
number of versions behind on the old box. In the past I've never moved 
reviewboard from one server to another, so perhaps the way I'm going about 
this is fundamentally flawed. Is there a better way to install reviewboard 
from scratch yet still take all of the data from another reviewboard 
installation and restore it?

Hopefully all of that makes sense.


On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 If the path is referencing an incorrect directory, then it sounds like you 
 may be using a database originally installed in a different path. You can 
 verify this by typing:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site list-siteconfig

 That will show you all your configured site settings, some of which will 
 have a path. You can change those paths from the command line through:

 $ rb-site manage /path/to/site set-siteconfig -- --key=key 
 --value=new_value

 Note the -- before the flags. That's important.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Papaswede papa...@gmail.com javascript:
  wrote:

 Yeah, I've tried various combinations of permissions and always 
 restarting apache after I make changes. I'm a bit stuck here as the error 
 messages do not make any sense to me.

 On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:47:00 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Have you tried restarting the web server (apache)?

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12 AM Papaswede papa...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've upgraded my ReviewBoard site and am now getting the errors in the 
 attached screenshot. The first and last errors don't make sense to me, 
 because /var/reviewboard/ is not the location of my reviewboard 
 installation. It's located in /opt/local/revboard/reviewboard. As far as 
 the other error messages go, I've done what they ask me to do, but they're 
 still showing up, so I'm not sure what to do there. I've verified that the 
 directories exist and have the correct permissions.


  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Installing ReviewBoard using pip

2015-05-06 Thread Sri Ram Kannan
Hi chris,

Thanks for your update. I will go with easy_install.

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 2:37:57 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Sri,

 For now, you need to use easy_install, for a number of reasons:

 1. Pip doesn't support eggs (we'll be releasing Wheels in the next release 
 of Review Board).
 2. Pip does support source dists, which we provide, but there's a lot of 
 manual steps needed for those to build, and we do not recommend it at all.
 3. Pip makes it harder to install externally-hosted builds. This will 
 change down the road, apparently, but for now, it's a lot harder to install 
 using pip.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Sri Ram Kannan sriram...@gmail.com 
 javascript: wrote:

 Hi,

 I read few posts in this group that Review board cannot installed using 
 pip. 

 But I see reviewboard in PyPi page and when I tried to install using pip, 
 I got the below error:

   Could not find any downloads that satisfy the requirement ReviewBoard
   Some externally hosted files were ignored (use --allow-external 
 ReviewBoard to allow).
 Cleaning up...
 No distributions at all found for ReviewBoard
 Storing debug log for failure in /data/users/skannan/.pip/pip.log

 Can some update me ?

 Regards,
 Sri.

  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3862 in reviewboard: Loading Patch hangs due to french local

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard


Comment #1 on issue 3862 by msu...@aurea.com: Loading Patch hangs due to  
french local

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3862

The patch file in question was generated on a windows machine configured  
with a french local using TurtoiseSVN. It looks like this changed the SVN  
keywords that are appearing in the patch file.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Issue 3864 in reviewboard: rbt post //depot/path/...@r1,@r2 throws an exception in 0.7.2 and no review request gets created

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 3864 by seide.al...@gmail.com: rbt post  
//depot/path/...@r1,@r2  throws an exception in 0.7.2 and no review  
request gets created

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3864

*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be
*** rejected.
***
*** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially
to
*** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug
*** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release.
***
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
***
*** If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
***
*** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other
information
*** that you include has been stripped of confidential information.


What version are you running?

RBTools 0.7.2
RB 1.7.28 and 2.0.15


What's the URL of the page containing the problem?

NA


What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.

$  rbt --version
RBTools 0.6.3

$ rbt post  //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/...@813,@823
Review request #11 posted.

http://localhost/r/11/
http://localhost/r/11/diff/

I discarded that review and then ran the same exact command against the same
repo using RBTools 0.7.2. I had to add the debug option to get any useful
output:

$  rbt --version
RBTools 0.7.2

$ rbt post  -d  //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/...@813,@823

snip

+Test submitting a review with a shelve and no ship its.
---

Writing //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#77 to /tmp/tmpQNewPu
Running: p4 print -o /tmp/tmpQNewPu -q //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#77
Writing //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#78 to /tmp/tmpUJo72G
Running: p4 print -o /tmp/tmpUJo72G -q //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#78
Running: diff -urNp /tmp/tmpQNewPu /tmp/tmpUJo72G
Command exited with rc 1: [u'diff',  
u'-urNp', '/tmp/tmpQNewPu', '/tmp/tmpUJo72G']

--- /tmp/tmpQNewPu  2015-05-05 17:54:57.889010010 -0700
+++ /tmp/tmpUJo72G  2015-05-05 17:54:57.893009847 -0700
@@ -548,3 +548,4 @@ Release notes for Jam 2.0.

A poorly set $(JAMSHELL) is likely to result in silent
failure.
+Test creating with 2 jobs.
---

Making HTTP GET request to http://localhost/api/validation/diffs/
Cached response for HTTP GET http://localhost/api/validation/diffs/  
expired and was modified

Making HTTP POST request to http://localhost/api/validation/diffs/

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7.2', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
   
File /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/main.py,  
line 133, in main

command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
   
File /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py,  
line 555, in run_from_argv

exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
   
File /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,  
line 714, in main

self.check_guess_fields()
   
File /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,  
line 553, in check_guess_fields

assert self.revisions
AssertionError


When I ran it under a debugger, I found that it was trying to run

p4 change  //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/...@813,@823


What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

A new review request

What operating system are you using? What browser?

CentOS 6 and Ubuntu

Please provide any additional information below.

Chris correctly assessed the problem:

This looks like a bug with the commit message guessing feature and Perforce  
revision ranges. Can you try running the same command with '-g no' ?


That does in fact get past the error.



--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Installing ReviewBoard using pip

2015-05-06 Thread Sri Ram Kannan
Hi,

I read few posts in this group that Review board cannot installed using 
pip. 

But I see reviewboard in PyPi page and when I tried to install using pip, I 
got the below error:

  Could not find any downloads that satisfy the requirement ReviewBoard
  Some externally hosted files were ignored (use --allow-external 
ReviewBoard to allow).
Cleaning up...
No distributions at all found for ReviewBoard
Storing debug log for failure in /data/users/skannan/.pip/pip.log

Can some update me ?

Regards,
Sri.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Component-API

Comment #1 on issue 3863 by chip...@gmail.com: Web API should provide an id  
field for a review request's every depends_on entry

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863

A worthwhile thing to add.

What you can do for now is to add ?expand=depends_on to the URL, which will  
return a payload with each full review request payload embedded.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: RBTools 0.7.2: posting a review using a range of perforce change lists no longer works

2015-05-06 Thread Steve
Hi Chris, 

Just to close the loop on this topic - the problem with the diffs that I 
mentioned turned out to be a memcache issue.  Turns out that using memcache 
on a test machine where you're continually deleting and recreating a 
perforce depot and rb site, thus reusing change list numbers, can be very 
confusing to memcached :)  I turned off memcache and then got the diffs I 
was expecting.

--Steve

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:49:14 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote:

 Issue 3864 created.

 Thanks!

 --Steve


 On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 7:14:07 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Steve,

 Glad it hear it (with the exception of the diff not being correct).

 I'd appreciate a bug report on it. I won't be able to get to this right 
 away, so having all these details will help for later.

 Thanks!

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Steve seide...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Chris,

 The good news is, your diagnosis is correct.  Use of '-g no' got past 
 the error.  The bad news is, the diff posted is not correct.  But I found 
 that the diff posted with 0.6.3 is the same incorrect diff (it's incomplete 
 and appears to be a single change instead of a range), so I'm going to have 
 to investigate that some more and get back to you.

 Do I need to file a bug on this issue, or do you have enough already to 
 resolve it?

 Thanks!

 --Steve

 On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 6:52:29 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Steve,

 This looks like a bug with the commit message guessing feature and 
 Perforce revision ranges. Can you try running the same command with '-g 
 no' 
 ?

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Steve seide...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've been doing a fair amount of testing of RBTools in preparation for 
 moving to RB 2.0 and I've come across a few important issues that are 
 preventing us from moving to RBTools 0.7.  The 2 most significant ones 
 appear to be regressions as my tests pass in 0.6.3 but fail in 0.7.2.

 The first issue has already been reported by someone else as issue 
 3843.  I've reproduced it and added a comment saying that it doesn't 
 happen 
 in 0.6.3 and I can provide a test file if desired.

 The second issue comes up when I try to post a review using a range of 
 perforce change lists.  This always worked for us with post-review, and 
 it 
 works with RBTools 0.6.3, but fails with 0.7.2.  Here's an example:

 $  rbt --version
 RBTools 0.6.3
 $ rbt post  //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/...@813,@823
 Review request #11 posted.

 http://localhost/r/11/
 http://localhost/r/11/diff/

 I discarded that review and then ran the same exact command against 
 the same repo using RBTools 0.7.2. I had to add the debug option to get 
 any 
 useful output:
 $  rbt --version
 RBTools 0.7.2
 $ rbt post  -d  //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/...@813,@823

 snip

 +Test submitting a review with a shelve and no ship its.
 ---
  Writing //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#77 to /tmp/tmpQNewPu
  Running: p4 print -o /tmp/tmpQNewPu -q 
 //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#77
  Writing //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#78 to /tmp/tmpUJo72G
  Running: p4 print -o /tmp/tmpUJo72G -q 
 //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/RELNOTES#78
  Running: diff -urNp /tmp/tmpQNewPu /tmp/tmpUJo72G
  Command exited with rc 1: [u'diff', u'-urNp', '/tmp/tmpQNewPu', 
 '/tmp/tmpUJo72G']
 --- /tmp/tmpQNewPu  2015-05-05 17:54:57.889010010 -0700
 +++ /tmp/tmpUJo72G  2015-05-05 17:54:57.893009847 -0700
 @@ -548,3 +548,4 @@ Release notes for Jam 2.0.
  
 A poorly set $(JAMSHELL) is likely to result in silent
 failure.
 +Test creating with 2 jobs.
 ---
  Making HTTP GET request to http://localhost/api/validation/diffs/
  Cached response for HTTP GET 
 http://localhost/api/validation/diffs/ expired and was modified
  Making HTTP POST request to http://localhost/api/validation/diffs/
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
 load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7.2', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
   File 
 /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/main.py,
  
 line 133, in main
 command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
   File 
 /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py,
  
 line 555, in run_from_argv
 exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
   File 
 /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,
  
 line 714, in main
 self.check_guess_fields()
   File 
 /home/sallan/envs/rbtools-0.7.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,
  
 line 553, in check_guess_fields
 

Customize Administrator Dashboard

2015-05-06 Thread Tanuj Sharma
Hello,

First of all, I would like to appreciate your work. ReviewBoard is a very 
solution for online code reviews.

I want to know if there some way I can customize administrator dashboard to 
show me more graphs like for a particular user how many comments were given 
on a review package? How many minor  major comments reported on a review? 

This is something I need to present in our project meetings.

Any help on this will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Tanuj Sharma

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.