Re: Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-27 Thread Greg Mann

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
---

(Updated Feb. 28, 2018, 1:36 a.m.)


Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.


Bugs: MESOS-8576
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8576


Repository: mesos


Description
---

Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.

However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
`Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
Future.


Diffs
-

  src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/


Testing
---

`sudo make check`


Thanks,

Greg Mann



Re: Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-27 Thread Greg Mann

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
---

(Updated Feb. 28, 2018, 1:04 a.m.)


Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.


Bugs: MESOS-8576
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8576


Repository: mesos


Description
---

Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.

However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
`Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
Future.


Diffs
-

  src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/


Testing
---

`sudo make check`


Thanks,

Greg Mann



Re: Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-23 Thread Gilbert Song

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/#review198191
---


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Gilbert Song


On Feb. 21, 2018, 4:39 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2018, 4:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8575
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8575
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
> Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
> Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
> Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.
> 
> However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
> `Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
> addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
> Future.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> `sudo make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>



Re: Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-23 Thread Andrei Budnik

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/#review198182
---


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Andrei Budnik


On Feb. 22, 2018, 12:39 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2018, 12:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8575
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8575
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
> Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
> Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
> Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.
> 
> However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
> `Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
> addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
> Future.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> `sudo make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>



Re: Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-21 Thread Mesos Reviewbot

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/#review198085
---



Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [65743, 65683]

Failed command: python support/apply-reviews.py -n -r 65683

Error:
2018-02-22 01:06:40 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/65683/diff/raw/ 
[2168/2168] -> "65683.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/docker/docker.cpp:1308
error: src/docker/docker.cpp: patch does not apply

Full log: https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Reviewbot/21723/console

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Feb. 22, 2018, 12:39 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2018, 12:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8575
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8575
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
> Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
> Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
> Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.
> 
> However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
> `Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
> addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
> Future.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> `sudo make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>



Re: Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-21 Thread Mesos Reviewbot Windows

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/#review198084
---



FAIL: Failed to apply the dependent review: 65683.

Failed command: `python.exe .\support\apply-reviews.py -n -r 65683`

All the build artifacts available at: 
http://dcos-win.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/mesos-build/review/65743

Relevant logs:

- 
[apply-review-65683-stdout.log](http://dcos-win.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/mesos-build/review/65743/logs/apply-review-65683-stdout.log):

```
error: patch failed: src/docker/docker.cpp:1308
error: src/docker/docker.cpp: patch does not apply
```

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Feb. 22, 2018, 12:39 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2018, 12:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8575
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8575
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
> Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
> Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
> Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.
> 
> However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
> `Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
> addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
> Future.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> `sudo make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>



Review Request 65743: Ensured that Docker containerizer returns a failed Future in one case.

2018-02-21 Thread Greg Mann

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/
---

Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, and Michael Park.


Bugs: MESOS-8575
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8575


Repository: mesos


Description
---

Because the Docker library did not immediately transition the
Future returned by `inspect()` to DISCARDED, it was safe for the
Docker containerizer to discard this Future before failing the
Promise associated with the Future returned by `launch()`.

However, the introduction of an `onDiscard` callback in
`Docker::inspect()` makes this assumption invalid. This patch
addresses this by failing the Promise before discarding the
Future.


Diffs
-

  src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 7585178f34bdb782f0108d3ab94c23edfacc5564 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65743/diff/1/


Testing
---

`sudo make check`


Thanks,

Greg Mann