[GitHub] spark pull request #22687: [SPARK-25702][SQL] Push down filters with `Not` o...

2018-10-10 Thread gengliangwang
Github user gengliangwang closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22687


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22687: [SPARK-25702][SQL] Push down filters with `Not` o...

2018-10-10 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22687#discussion_r224021798
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
 ---
@@ -534,6 +534,13 @@ private[parquet] class ParquetFilters(
 createFilterHelper(nameToParquetField, rhs, 
canPartialPushDownConjuncts = false)
 } yield FilterApi.or(lhsFilter, rhsFilter)
 
+  case sources.Not(sources.Or(lhs, rhs)) if 
canPartialPushDownConjuncts =>
+createFilterHelper(nameToParquetField,
+  sources.And(sources.Not(lhs), sources.Not(rhs)), 
canPartialPushDownConjuncts = true)
+
+  case sources.Not(sources.Not(pred)) if canPartialPushDownConjuncts =>
--- End diff --

hm, is this actually reachable?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22687: [SPARK-25702][SQL] Push down filters with `Not` o...

2018-10-10 Thread gengliangwang
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22687

[SPARK-25702][SQL] Push down filters with `Not` operator in Parquet

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, in ParquetFilters, predicates inside `Not` operator are 
considered as unable to perform partial push down.
However, the following cases is still possible for push down:
1. `Not(Or(left, right))` can be conversed as `And(Not(left), Not(right))`
2. `Not(Not(pred))` can be conversed as `pred`

Both cases should be quite trivial, since the `Not` operator should be 
pushed down by optimization rule `BooleanSimplification` already.
But I think it should be good to handle such cases in Parquet data source 
module as well.

## How was this patch tested?

New unit test.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/gengliangwang/spark parquetNotFilters

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22687.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #22687


commit 0f43db656c3567ab7f8b711c8f0b27b16caa4bf7
Author: Gengliang Wang 
Date:   2018-10-10T09:40:45Z

push down more parquet filters




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org