Re: Packagecloud.io issue

2015-04-02 Thread Alex De la rosa
Awesome, I just re-run the "aptitude update" and "aptitude safe-upgrade"
and riak didn't come again : )

Thanks!
Alex

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Greg Cymbalski 
wrote:

> Alex-
>   Turns out that there was an indexing issue with Packagecloud, which
> should be resolved now. Good news, no need to respin packages :)
>
>   Thanks,
> —Greg
>
> On Apr 1, 2015, at 11:38 AM, Greg Cymbalski  wrote:
>
> Alex-
>   We’ve managed to reproduce that issue and are researching it now. It
> does appear to be something in the package itself; not sure how that didn’t
> turn up until now.
>
>   We’ll keep you updated. Thanks!
> —Greg
>
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:00 AM, riak-users-requ...@lists.basho.com wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:55:41 +0200
> From: Alex De la rosa 
> To: riak-users 
> Subject: Packagecloud.io issue
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi there,
>
> I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; everytime I
> do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new version of Riak is available
> (that is not)... and I have to re-install Riak to a version I already have.
>
> I just did an "aptitude safe-upgrade" and upgraded Riak to version 2.0.5
> (latest):
>
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>  ... ... ... riak ... ... ... ... ... ...
> [...]
> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.1) ...
> [...]
>
> # riak version
> 2.0.5
>
> # aptitude update
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty InRelease
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main Sources
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main amd64 Packages
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main i386 Packages
>
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>  riak
> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/55.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
>
> if i select Y i get the following:
>
> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.5-1) ...
>
> and everytime I check for updates, "riak" comes as requiring an update
> although is not true. How to fix that? makes no sense it continues coming
> as needing to be upgraded when is the same exact version.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20150330/b2e2620c/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
>
>
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


Re: Packagecloud.io issue

2015-04-02 Thread Greg Cymbalski
Alex-
  Turns out that there was an indexing issue with Packagecloud, which should be 
resolved now. Good news, no need to respin packages :)

  Thanks,
—Greg

On Apr 1, 2015, at 11:38 AM, Greg Cymbalski  wrote:

> Alex-
>   We’ve managed to reproduce that issue and are researching it now. It does 
> appear to be something in the package itself; not sure how that didn’t turn 
> up until now.
> 
>   We’ll keep you updated. Thanks!
> —Greg
> 
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:00 AM, riak-users-requ...@lists.basho.com wrote:
> 
>> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:55:41 +0200
>> From: Alex De la rosa 
>> To: riak-users 
>> Subject: Packagecloud.io issue
>> Message-ID:
>>  
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; everytime I
>> do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new version of Riak is available
>> (that is not)... and I have to re-install Riak to a version I already have.
>> 
>> I just did an "aptitude safe-upgrade" and upgraded Riak to version 2.0.5
>> (latest):
>> 
>> # aptitude safe-upgrade
>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>>  ... ... ... riak ... ... ... ... ... ...
>> [...]
>> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.1) ...
>> [...]
>> 
>> # riak version
>> 2.0.5
>> 
>> # aptitude update
>> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty InRelease
>> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main Sources
>> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main amd64 Packages
>> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main i386 Packages
>> 
>> # aptitude safe-upgrade
>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>>  riak
>> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> Need to get 0 B/55.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
>> 
>> if i select Y i get the following:
>> 
>> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.5-1) ...
>> 
>> and everytime I check for updates, "riak" comes as requiring an update
>> although is not true. How to fix that? makes no sense it continues coming
>> as needing to be upgraded when is the same exact version.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20150330/b2e2620c/attachment-0001.html>
> 

___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


Re: Packagecloud.io issue

2015-04-01 Thread Alex De la rosa
Good to know it will finally get fixed : )

[not sure how that didn’t turn up until now] ---> I actually reported it
several times in the past:

August 2014:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2014-August/015702.html

September 2014:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2014-September/015884.html

and now again in March 2015 : P

Thanks,
Alex

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Greg Cymbalski  wrote:

> Alex-
>   We’ve managed to reproduce that issue and are researching it now. It
> does appear to be something in the package itself; not sure how that didn’t
> turn up until now.
>
>   We’ll keep you updated. Thanks!
> —Greg
>
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:00 AM, riak-users-requ...@lists.basho.com wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:55:41 +0200
> From: Alex De la rosa 
> To: riak-users 
> Subject: Packagecloud.io issue
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; everytime I
> do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new version of Riak is available
> (that is not)... and I have to re-install Riak to a version I already have.
>
> I just did an "aptitude safe-upgrade" and upgraded Riak to version 2.0.5
> (latest):
>
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>  ... ... ... riak ... ... ... ... ... ...
> [...]
> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.1) ...
> [...]
>
> # riak version
> 2.0.5
>
> # aptitude update
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty InRelease
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main Sources
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main amd64 Packages
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main i386 Packages
>
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>  riak
> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/55.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
>
> if i select Y i get the following:
>
> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.5-1) ...
>
> and everytime I check for updates, "riak" comes as requiring an update
> although is not true. How to fix that? makes no sense it continues coming
> as needing to be upgraded when is the same exact version.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20150330/b2e2620c/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


Re: Packagecloud.io issue

2015-04-01 Thread Greg Cymbalski
Alex-
  We’ve managed to reproduce that issue and are researching it now. It does 
appear to be something in the package itself; not sure how that didn’t turn up 
until now.

  We’ll keep you updated. Thanks!
—Greg

On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:00 AM, riak-users-requ...@lists.basho.com wrote:

> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:55:41 +0200
> From: Alex De la rosa 
> To: riak-users 
> Subject: Packagecloud.io issue
> Message-ID:
>   
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; everytime I
> do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new version of Riak is available
> (that is not)... and I have to re-install Riak to a version I already have.
> 
> I just did an "aptitude safe-upgrade" and upgraded Riak to version 2.0.5
> (latest):
> 
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>  ... ... ... riak ... ... ... ... ... ...
> [...]
> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.1) ...
> [...]
> 
> # riak version
> 2.0.5
> 
> # aptitude update
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty InRelease
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main Sources
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main amd64 Packages
> Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main i386 Packages
> 
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>  riak
> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/55.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
> 
> if i select Y i get the following:
> 
> Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.5-1) ...
> 
> and everytime I check for updates, "riak" comes as requiring an update
> although is not true. How to fix that? makes no sense it continues coming
> as needing to be upgraded when is the same exact version.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/attachments/20150330/b2e2620c/attachment-0001.html>

___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


Packagecloud.io issue

2015-03-30 Thread Alex De la rosa
Hi there,

I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; everytime I
do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new version of Riak is available
(that is not)... and I have to re-install Riak to a version I already have.

I just did an "aptitude safe-upgrade" and upgraded Riak to version 2.0.5
(latest):

# aptitude safe-upgrade
The following packages will be upgraded:
  ... ... ... riak ... ... ... ... ... ...
[...]
Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.1) ...
[...]

# riak version
2.0.5

# aptitude update
Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty InRelease
Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main Sources
Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main amd64 Packages
Hit https://packagecloud.io trusty/main i386 Packages

# aptitude safe-upgrade
The following packages will be upgraded:
  riak
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/55.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]

if i select Y i get the following:

Unpacking riak (2.0.5-1) over (2.0.5-1) ...

and everytime I check for updates, "riak" comes as requiring an update
although is not true. How to fix that? makes no sense it continues coming
as needing to be upgraded when is the same exact version.

Thanks,
Alex
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


Re: Packagecloud.io

2014-09-03 Thread Jared Morrow
Alex,

If you want to use apt to install Riak, then packagecloud.io is what you
need to do since we are not updating our [apt|yum].basho.com repos moving
forward.  We need to update our documentation, so I'll get on that right
away.

Right now an upgrade is available for Riak (2.0.0 rather than rc1).  Go
ahead and do that upgrade and let me know if you still have problems.

Using the scripts provided by packagecloud.io is the best way to ensure the
repository is setup correctly on your system.

Sorry for your trouble,
-Jared


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Alex De la rosa 
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> The official documentation doesn't explain how to install through
> packagecloud.io but instead it uses riak's own repositories:
>
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/2.0.0/ops/building/installing/debian-ubuntu/
>
> Also, I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; I
> followed the instructions there to install my Riak 2.0 RC1 without any
> issues, however, everytime I do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new
> version of Riak is available (that is not)... so now I have no wait to do
> "aptitude safe-upgrade" without having to re-install Riak to a version I
> already have.
>
> Should we avoid using packagecloud.io?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


Packagecloud.io

2014-09-02 Thread Alex De la rosa
Hi there,

The official documentation doesn't explain how to install through
packagecloud.io but instead it uses riak's own repositories:

http://docs.basho.com/riak/2.0.0/ops/building/installing/debian-ubuntu/

Also, I want to report again a problem I have with packagecloud.io; I
followed the instructions there to install my Riak 2.0 RC1 without any
issues, however, everytime I do "aptitude update" I get a hit as if a new
version of Riak is available (that is not)... so now I have no wait to do
"aptitude safe-upgrade" without having to re-install Riak to a version I
already have.

Should we avoid using packagecloud.io?

Thanks,
Alex
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com