Riak Java Protobuf objects
Have the Riak Java Protobuf artifacts been updated to take advantage of Riak 2.0 features yet? I'd like to work some more on getting the Riaktor (Riak async Java client based on Reactor [1]) up to Riak 2.0 functionality. Currently I'm using the Protobuf artifact for the actual objects I need to do the interactions. I'm handling all the network IO through Reactor/Netty and using the simple codecs in Reactor. If not, can I just generate the Java objects I need from the original protobuf definitions? [1] - https://github.com/reactor/reactor Thanks! Jon Brisbin | Reactor Project Lead http://about.me/jbrisbin | @j_brisbin ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: Riak Java Protobuf objects
At Maven central repos it has yes: https://repository.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~riak-pb HTH, Guido. On 21/01/14 14:22, Jon Brisbin wrote: Have the Riak Java Protobuf artifacts been updated to take advantage of Riak 2.0 features yet? I'd like to work some more on getting the Riaktor (Riak async Java client based on Reactor [1]) up to Riak 2.0 functionality. Currently I'm using the Protobuf artifact for the actual objects I need to do the interactions. I'm handling all the network IO through Reactor/Netty and using the simple codecs in Reactor. If not, can I just generate the Java objects I need from the original protobuf definitions? [1] - https://github.com/reactor/reactor Thanks! Jon Brisbin | Reactor Project Lead http://about.me/jbrisbin | @j_brisbin ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: Riak Java Protobuf objects
Jon, Yes, we released riak_pb 2.0.0.11 to maven central for the new Riak Java Client v2.0 core preview (the all-new official async Riak Java client based on Netty[1]) we announced a couple weeks ago - it supports all the new Riak 2.0 functionality. dependency groupIdcom.basho.riak.protobuf/groupId artifactIdriak-pb/artifactId version2.0.0.11/version /dependency [1] - https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/tree/master On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jon Brisbin j...@jbrisbin.com wrote: Have the Riak Java Protobuf artifacts been updated to take advantage of Riak 2.0 features yet? I'd like to work some more on getting the Riaktor (Riak async Java client based on Reactor [1]) up to Riak 2.0 functionality. Currently I'm using the Protobuf artifact for the actual objects I need to do the interactions. I'm handling all the network IO through Reactor/Netty and using the simple codecs in Reactor. If not, can I just generate the Java objects I need from the original protobuf definitions? [1] - https://github.com/reactor/reactor Thanks! Jon Brisbin | Reactor Project Lead http://about.me/jbrisbin | @j_brisbin ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: Riak Java Protobuf objects
Is the Protobuf interaction still enforced sequentially? e.g. responses only come in the order in which the corresponding request was sent and a long request will hold up the results of subsequent, but smaller requests? I guess the answer for parallelism is to simply use a pool of connections. How many per client are considered acceptable now that R16 has better non-blocking IO support? Thanks! Jon Brisbin http://about.me/jonbrisbin | Twitter: @JonBrisbin On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Brian Roach wrote: Jon, Yes, we released riak_pb 2.0.0.11 to maven central for the new Riak Java Client v2.0 core preview (the all-new official async Riak Java client based on Netty[1]) we announced a couple weeks ago - it supports all the new Riak 2.0 functionality. dependency groupIdcom.basho.riak.protobuf/groupId artifactIdriak-pb/artifactId version2.0.0.11/version /dependency [1] - https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/tree/master On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jon Brisbin j...@jbrisbin.com (mailto:j...@jbrisbin.com) wrote: Have the Riak Java Protobuf artifacts been updated to take advantage of Riak 2.0 features yet? I'd like to work some more on getting the Riaktor (Riak async Java client based on Reactor [1]) up to Riak 2.0 functionality. Currently I'm using the Protobuf artifact for the actual objects I need to do the interactions. I'm handling all the network IO through Reactor/Netty and using the simple codecs in Reactor. If not, can I just generate the Java objects I need from the original protobuf definitions? [1] - https://github.com/reactor/reactor Thanks! Jon Brisbin | Reactor Project Lead http://about.me/jbrisbin | @j_brisbin ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com (mailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com) http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: Riak Java Protobuf objects
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Jon Brisbin j...@jbrisbin.com wrote: Is the Protobuf interaction still enforced sequentially? e.g. responses only come in the order in which the corresponding request was sent and a long request will hold up the results of subsequent, but smaller requests? There has never been a guarantee of this; we don't support pipelining of requests. Requests are sequential in that you should make a request then wait for the reply before issuing another request on the same connection. I guess the answer for parallelism is to simply use a pool of connections. Correct. This is what all the clients have always done. How many per client are considered acceptable now that R16 has better non-blocking IO support? The number of connections has always been largely irrelevant; make 1000 of them if you'd like ... just don't try to send 1000 operations at once if the node can't handle it. The workload on the node is the (far) greater limiting factor. - Roach Thanks! Jon Brisbin http://about.me/jonbrisbin | Twitter: @JonBrisbin On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Brian Roach wrote: Jon, Yes, we released riak_pb 2.0.0.11 to maven central for the new Riak Java Client v2.0 core preview (the all-new official async Riak Java client based on Netty[1]) we announced a couple weeks ago - it supports all the new Riak 2.0 functionality. dependency groupIdcom.basho.riak.protobuf/groupId artifactIdriak-pb/artifactId version2.0.0.11/version /dependency [1] - https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/tree/master On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jon Brisbin j...@jbrisbin.com wrote: Have the Riak Java Protobuf artifacts been updated to take advantage of Riak 2.0 features yet? I'd like to work some more on getting the Riaktor (Riak async Java client based on Reactor [1]) up to Riak 2.0 functionality. Currently I'm using the Protobuf artifact for the actual objects I need to do the interactions. I'm handling all the network IO through Reactor/Netty and using the simple codecs in Reactor. If not, can I just generate the Java objects I need from the original protobuf definitions? [1] - https://github.com/reactor/reactor Thanks! Jon Brisbin | Reactor Project Lead http://about.me/jbrisbin | @j_brisbin ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
