Re: non-indexable SOLR schema
Uhm, interesting, I didn't see that page; I believe the one I saw was about using Riak Search and that's where my assumption on needing to create an index to make a bucket_type came along. Much easier though! Thanks! Alex On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath wrote: > Riak does not in any way rely on solr for its KV operations. Not sure > where you are seeing that or what code you are looking at but you can > define bucket types, activate them without ever touching solr. The basic > bucket type set up instructions can be found here: > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/bucket-types/. > > On 4/4/15, 8:51 AM, "Alex De la rosa" > wrote: > > How to do that? > > For what I have seen, to use these special data types you need to create > a bucket under a bucket_type; and this bucket type is created following an > index so data gets indexed in Solr. > > On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath > wrote: > >> You do not have to set up Yokozuna (yz) to be able to use counters, >> sets, maps in Riak. Those types can be used independently via the Riak key >> value store. You only need to set up the indexes if you were to search for >> data via yz or search 2.0. And in that case, you can remove the generic >> mappings, keep the _yz specific ones and then explicitly add the fields you >> want to index/search on. >> >> On 4/4/15, 7:25 AM, "Alex De la rosa" wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object >> into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. >> >> However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if >> using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema "ignoring" all >> fields so nothing is indexed? I don't need to use Riak Search on these >> objects, as I always know the KEY to fetch them. A schema like this would >> work? ( I guess that I can not put [ indexed="false" ] in the "_yz*" fields >> required by Riak, right? Or is it possible to not index that data either? ) >> >> —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— >> >> >> >> >> >> > multiValued="false" required="true"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >>> multiValued="false"/> >> >> >> _yz_id >> >> >> > multiValued="true" class="solr.StrField" /> >> >> > sortMissingLast="true" /> >> >> >> —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— >> >> Another question, can I use the [ compressed="true" ] to save disk >> space? in both and "_yz*" fields? >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: non-indexable SOLR schema
Riak does not in any way rely on solr for its KV operations. Not sure where you are seeing that or what code you are looking at but you can define bucket types, activate them without ever touching solr. The basic bucket type set up instructions can be found here: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/bucket-types/. On 4/4/15, 8:51 AM, "Alex De la rosa" mailto:alex.rosa@gmail.com>> wrote: How to do that? For what I have seen, to use these special data types you need to create a bucket under a bucket_type; and this bucket type is created following an index so data gets indexed in Solr. On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath mailto:sh...@debnath.net>> wrote: You do not have to set up Yokozuna (yz) to be able to use counters, sets, maps in Riak. Those types can be used independently via the Riak key value store. You only need to set up the indexes if you were to search for data via yz or search 2.0. And in that case, you can remove the generic mappings, keep the _yz specific ones and then explicitly add the fields you want to index/search on. On 4/4/15, 7:25 AM, "Alex De la rosa" > wrote: Hi all, To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema "ignoring" all fields so nothing is indexed? I don't need to use Riak Search on these objects, as I always know the KEY to fetch them. A schema like this would work? ( I guess that I can not put [ indexed="false" ] in the "_yz*" fields required by Riak, right? Or is it possible to not index that data either? ) —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— _yz_id —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— Another question, can I use the [ compressed="true" ] to save disk space? in both and "_yz*" fields? Thanks, Alex ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: non-indexable SOLR schema
How to do that? For what I have seen, to use these special data types you need to create a bucket under a bucket_type; and this bucket type is created following an index so data gets indexed in Solr. On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath wrote: > You do not have to set up Yokozuna (yz) to be able to use counters, > sets, maps in Riak. Those types can be used independently via the Riak key > value store. You only need to set up the indexes if you were to search for > data via yz or search 2.0. And in that case, you can remove the generic > mappings, keep the _yz specific ones and then explicitly add the fields you > want to index/search on. > > On 4/4/15, 7:25 AM, "Alex De la rosa" > wrote: > > Hi all, > > To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object > into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. > > However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if > using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema "ignoring" all > fields so nothing is indexed? I don't need to use Riak Search on these > objects, as I always know the KEY to fetch them. A schema like this would > work? ( I guess that I can not put [ indexed="false" ] in the "_yz*" fields > required by Riak, right? Or is it possible to not index that data either? ) > > —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— > > > > > > multiValued="false" required="true"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > multiValued="false"/> > > > _yz_id > > > multiValued="true" class="solr.StrField" /> > > /> > > > —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— > > Another question, can I use the [ compressed="true" ] to save disk > space? in both and "_yz*" fields? > > Thanks, > Alex > > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Re: non-indexable SOLR schema
You do not have to set up Yokozuna (yz) to be able to use counters, sets, maps in Riak. Those types can be used independently via the Riak key value store. You only need to set up the indexes if you were to search for data via yz or search 2.0. And in that case, you can remove the generic mappings, keep the _yz specific ones and then explicitly add the fields you want to index/search on. On 4/4/15, 7:25 AM, "Alex De la rosa" mailto:alex.rosa@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema "ignoring" all fields so nothing is indexed? I don't need to use Riak Search on these objects, as I always know the KEY to fetch them. A schema like this would work? ( I guess that I can not put [ indexed="false" ] in the "_yz*" fields required by Riak, right? Or is it possible to not index that data either? ) —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— _yz_id —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— Another question, can I use the [ compressed="true" ] to save disk space? in both and "_yz*" fields? Thanks, Alex ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
non-indexable SOLR schema
Hi all, To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema "ignoring" all fields so nothing is indexed? I don't need to use Riak Search on these objects, as I always know the KEY to fetch them. A schema like this would work? ( I guess that I can not put [ indexed="false" ] in the "_yz*" fields required by Riak, right? Or is it possible to not index that data either? ) —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— _yz_id —+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+—+— Another question, can I use the [ compressed="true" ] to save disk space? in both and "_yz*" fields? Thanks, Alex ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
