Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
> To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded > devices ageist!!!
Re: [atlas] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
On 2020/02/14 10:50 , Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > When the software probe projects started I offered to make a FreeBSD > port version. The developers said that that was a good idea and > they would come back to me. A FreeBSD port would be nice, but may be a significant amount of work. Philip
Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
If it's interesting to the community I could fire up a software probe at my house where I've also got a v4 probe. That way it would be a fairly direct comparison, even down to the hardware & software probe being in the same switch. ~P. -Original Message- From: ripe-atlas On Behalf Of Robert Kisteleki Sent: 14 February 2020 09:38 To: Romain Fontugne Cc: ripe-atlas@ripe.net Subject: Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs Linux on nowadays. Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates (same AS, same prefix, approximately same location): https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/130/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/28270/ (v3) or: https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/141/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/54558/ (v4) Cheers, Robert On 2020-02-14 02:42, Romain Fontugne wrote: > my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old > v1 seems a msec slower. All are very stable > > Romain > > > On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 104, and >> 106 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same >> vrrp exit etc. >> >> randy >> >
[atlas] Some Software Probes do not send any results
Hi Robert, weirdly, some of the SW probes are showing as "online" but do not provide any measurements results [event the Built-in ones], such as your mentioned 130 [Latest data point shown is from 2019-12-17 11:57 UTC] Also for example measurement https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/23955368/ shows 18 out of 71 SW probes were online [at the moment when I created the measurement] but never provided any results. In https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/23962519/ I requested all probes with tag system-software, you can see how many probes are Online while not providing any results. What I wanted to point out - I run SW probe 169 in Turris Omnia router and I noticed the same behavior - after router restart the SW probe goes online and looks fine, but does not send any results, until I restart the ATLAS process manually, then it runs fine until next router's reboot / power cycle. Cheers Jiri __ > Od: "Robert Kisteleki" > Komu: "Romain Fontugne" > Datum: 14.02.2020 10:38 > Předmět: Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes > > CC: > >To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded >devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs >Linux on nowadays. > >Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but >if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates (same AS, >same prefix, approximately same location): > >https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/130/ (sw) >https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/28270/ (v3) > >or: > >https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/141/ (sw) >https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/54558/ (v4) > >Cheers, >Robert > > >On 2020-02-14 02:42, Romain Fontugne wrote: >> my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old v1 >> seems a msec slower. All are very stable >> >> Romain >> >> >> On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 104, and >>> 106 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same vrrp >>> exit etc. >>> >>> randy >>> >> > > >
Re: [atlas] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
"Philip Paeps" writes:
> It should be fairly straightforward to run the software probe on FreeBSD
> under the Linux binary compatibility layer ("Linux personality
> disorder"). I've been meaning to poke at this but so many projects ...
> so little time.
When the software probe projects started I offered to make a FreeBSD
port version. The developers said that that was a good idea and
they would come back to me.
jaap
Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs Linux on nowadays. Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates (same AS, same prefix, approximately same location): https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/130/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/28270/ (v3) or: https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/141/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/54558/ (v4) Cheers, Robert On 2020-02-14 02:42, Romain Fontugne wrote: > my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old v1 > seems a msec slower. All are very stable > > Romain > > > On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 104, and >> 106 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same vrrp >> exit etc. >> >> randy >> >
