[RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
Hello, today I gave a shoot to glasscoder but I got some trouble. when I'm trying to connect with Icecast 2 : glasscoder --server-type=icecast2 --server-url= http://XXX.XXX.XXX:8015/stream --server-auth-usernam:password --audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio-bitrate=192 --stream-name="X" --audio-device=jack --jack-client-name="myname" --jack-gain=0 I got this error: glasscoder: server "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" returned unrecognized response glasscoder: connection to "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" lost I think the problem can be the double // and with Shoutcast V1 (I'm connecting to a liquidsoap) in the liquidsoap log [image: image.png] glasscoder --server-type=Shout1 --server-url=http://xxx.xxx.xxx:8015 --server-auth=username:password --audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio-bitrate=192 --stream-name="The Vintage Club" --audio-device=jack --jack-client-name="GlassMP3" --jack-gain=0 glasscoder: connected to JACK graph at 48000 samples/sec. glasscoder: login to "xxx.xxx.xxx:8015" rejected: Invalid password (all sensible data are hidden) With Darkice all is working. Thanks in advance Gabriele ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
Patrick, I know the addresses are a bit more daunting than the 4 octets we're use to. At least they're in hexadecimal. Back in the early days of digital networking I was a support engineer for a packet switched network carrier. We used Varian minicomputers that has about the same compute power as an apple watch and slightly less memory. All the software was hand coded in assembly language. One of the things I did was writing software patches and inserting them in nodes in various places around the world. If I messed up and the node crashed, that customer was off the net until their software was reloaded from California over the network. That involved loading net boot code that was 100 16 bit words long. It was very dense and one wrong bit in a word would cause it to fail. I remember one night I crashed a node in upstate NY and had to call their data center operator at about 2AM their time a read him the net boot over the phone as he put it into the switch register on the front of the minicomputer one word at a time. So yeah, those long IPv6 addresses are a pain but, there are worse things. :) - Bill On 8/20/19 11:09 AM, Patrick Linstruth wrote: I think that’s the main benefit of IPv6. No more NAT! My belief is IPv6 is being adopted slowly due to the “if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it” paradigm. I for one don’t like changing anything on my networks unless I have to. Changes always have unintended consequences (just look at some of my Rivendell PRs). Since most people have plenty enough address space and don’t seem to mind running NAT, there isn’t any real reason to change (hey, let’s change our entire network topography for no perceived benefit). I suppose when I ask AWS for an elastic IPv4 address and they tell me to go pound sand, it will force the issue for me. As for my home, Frontier DSL and Rise Wireless… I’m not sure if they can even spell IPv6. There’s also the support issue. I don’t know if you ever had to have someone, that can barely use a mouse, enter an IP address over the phone before. It’s only four 1-3 digit numbers and 3 periods, but you’d think you were having them enter the formula for transparent aluminum. Patrick On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Bill Putney wrote: On 8/20/19 9:25 AM, Cowboy wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:07:11 -0700 Bill Putney wrote: I am amazed at how slow the adoption of IPv6 has been. I'm not. Not at all ! There has been a working set of specs and hardware for almost 2 decades. True ! I don't know of anything built in the last decade that wasn't IPv6 capable. Really ? I'm not aware of much that *was* IPv6 capable the last 8 or ten years. Today, 2019, sure. 2009, not so sure. IPv6 been part of the requirements for equipment acquisition since the turn of the century. Certainly any network hardware all the computer operating systems and most appliances. People leave it turned off a lot because they don't have access to networks that support v6, but it's there. There haven't been IPv4 addresses available for 3 or so years. That's flat not true !! There have been and remain so today. Try to get a v5 CIDR block from ARIN. They were exhausted about 3 years ago. Even a /24 block. you can still get IP addresses from carriers, but starting a new ISP and see how far you get finding IP space. The only thing I can imagine is that there is some market force at work that is slowing it down. That's part of it, yes. google is pushing IPv6 hard, but we're getting to the point where google is the well known extra-legal universal mercenary spy organization. ( here's this portable camera/gps which we want you to take into the bath room with you so that you will have a better user experience. Yeah, right ! ) Knowing how evil google has become ( even dropped their moto "don't be evil" ) anyone *that* evil who favors IPv6 is almost reason enough to run like a raped ape ! Well, that's just silly. Go ahead and mistrust Google but it has nothing to do with IPv6. IPv6 has such a huge address space, we can discreetly address every grain of sand in the known universe. I suppose if we all stopped using NAT at gateways and every device had a unique address, folks lie Google and NSA could find a way to get up to some mischief. When I started working in the field, we all used unique addresses because no one could imagine we'd run out of the 4 octets of addresses. When I got my /24 in the 80's, the folks at SRI who had the contract to manage domains and addresses tried to talk me into a /16. I should have taken them up on it. Who knew I'd have a house full of computers? Like all the big carriers that have all the v4 address space have too much control of ICAN. No. More like the major backbone providers still have a great deal of IPv4 equipment out there in regular service. They're not going to trash it "just because" ! All of the equipment in the backbone can do both and have been capable
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:07:19 +0200 Workino wrote: > Am I in wrong? :) You are not wrong ! The only real issue, is that most all equipment can and does support IPv4 out of the box. Some also supports IPv6. So long as you have a NAT router to gateway between the IPv6 and IPv4, it really doesn't matter, except in cases like the one in question, where the software *may* be coded in such a way that it will *only* support one, or the other. If the software is done right, ( not always easy ) it talks to the kernel ( on linux ) and lets it figure out how to talk to the wire. -- Cowboy Grief is the Reminder that we Loved. And were Loved. ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
Here all provider is giving only ipv6 and ipv4 is a shared one so if I would like to have a static ipv4 I need to pay a good amount of money. All good hardware is supporting ipv6 from long time so no big issue to use is just a little bit more complicate but also not so much. For the problem to insert the IPv6 manually i don’t think no one will give an ip to connect but a domain name normally. In this time there are a lot of providers who can manage ipv6 + ipv4 dns for free ( like dnsexit.com and many other). Anyway we are speaking about glasscoder and if it is not supporting ipv6 is not a real problem, normally it is running in the lan to be connected to the real streaming server like icecast, shoutcast, hls or any other kind of streamer. If is needed to connect to external server normally this one have for sure an ipv4 so again is still not so big deal and if also the server had only ipv6 nice tunnel (openvpn, ssh, pptp) and all is working again. Am I in wrong? :) Regards Gabriele Ps: who have no ipv6 at home but would like to have just get a class /64 from hurricane https://tunnelbroker.net/ for free. Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Aug 2019, at 20:09, Patrick Linstruth wrote: > > I think that’s the main benefit of IPv6. No more NAT! > > My belief is IPv6 is being adopted slowly due to the “if it isn’t broke, > don’t fix it” paradigm. I for one don’t like changing anything on my networks > unless I have to. Changes always have unintended consequences (just look at > some of my Rivendell PRs). Since most people have plenty enough address space > and don’t seem to mind running NAT, there isn’t any real reason to change > (hey, let’s change our entire network topography for no perceived benefit). I > suppose when I ask AWS for an elastic IPv4 address and they tell me to go > pound sand, it will force the issue for me. As for my home, Frontier DSL and > Rise Wireless… I’m not sure if they can even spell IPv6. > > There’s also the support issue. I don’t know if you ever had to have someone, > that can barely use a mouse, enter an IP address over the phone before. It’s > only four 1-3 digit numbers and 3 periods, but you’d think you were having > them enter the formula for transparent aluminum. > > Patrick > >> On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Bill Putney wrote: >> >> >>> On 8/20/19 9:25 AM, Cowboy wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:07:11 -0700 >>> Bill Putney wrote: >>> I am amazed at how slow the adoption of IPv6 has been. >>> I'm not. Not at all ! >>> There has been a working set of specs and hardware for almost 2 decades. >>> True ! >>> I don't know of anything built in the last decade that wasn't IPv6 capable. >>> Really ? >>> I'm not aware of much that *was* IPv6 capable the last 8 or ten years. >>> Today, 2019, sure. 2009, not so sure. >> IPv6 been part of the requirements for equipment acquisition since the turn >> of the century. Certainly any network hardware all the computer operating >> systems and most appliances. People leave it turned off a lot because they >> don't have access to networks that support v6, but it's there. >>> There haven't been IPv4 addresses available for 3 or so years. >>> That's flat not true !! >>> There have been and remain so today. >> Try to get a v5 CIDR block from ARIN. They were exhausted about 3 years ago. >> Even a /24 block. you can still get IP addresses from carriers, but starting >> a new ISP and see how far you get finding IP space. >>> The only thing I can imagine is that there is some market force at work that is slowing it down. >>> That's part of it, yes. >>> google is pushing IPv6 hard, but we're getting to the point where google is >>> the >>> well known extra-legal universal mercenary spy organization. >>> ( here's this portable camera/gps which we want you to take into the bath >>> room with you >>> so that you will have a better user experience. Yeah, right ! ) >>> Knowing how evil google has become ( even dropped their moto "don't be >>> evil" ) anyone >>> *that* evil who favors IPv6 is almost reason enough to run like a raped ape >>> ! >> Well, that's just silly. Go ahead and mistrust Google but it has nothing to >> do with IPv6. IPv6 has such a huge address space, we can discreetly address >> every grain of sand in the known universe. I suppose if we all stopped using >> NAT at gateways and every device had a unique address, folks lie Google and >> NSA could find a way to get up to some mischief. When I started working in >> the field, we all used unique addresses because no one could imagine we'd >> run out of the 4 octets of addresses. When I got my /24 in the 80's, the >> folks at SRI who had the contract to manage domains and addresses tried to >> talk me into a /16. I should have taken them up on it. Who knew I'd have a >> house full of computers? >>> Like all the big carriers that have all the v4 address space have
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
I think that’s the main benefit of IPv6. No more NAT! My belief is IPv6 is being adopted slowly due to the “if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it” paradigm. I for one don’t like changing anything on my networks unless I have to. Changes always have unintended consequences (just look at some of my Rivendell PRs). Since most people have plenty enough address space and don’t seem to mind running NAT, there isn’t any real reason to change (hey, let’s change our entire network topography for no perceived benefit). I suppose when I ask AWS for an elastic IPv4 address and they tell me to go pound sand, it will force the issue for me. As for my home, Frontier DSL and Rise Wireless… I’m not sure if they can even spell IPv6. There’s also the support issue. I don’t know if you ever had to have someone, that can barely use a mouse, enter an IP address over the phone before. It’s only four 1-3 digit numbers and 3 periods, but you’d think you were having them enter the formula for transparent aluminum. Patrick > On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Bill Putney wrote: > > > On 8/20/19 9:25 AM, Cowboy wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:07:11 -0700 >> Bill Putney wrote: >> >>> I am amazed at how slow the adoption of IPv6 has been. >> I'm not. Not at all ! >> >>> There has been a >>> working set of specs and hardware for almost 2 decades. >> True ! >> >>> I don't know of >>> anything built in the last decade that wasn't IPv6 capable. >> Really ? >> I'm not aware of much that *was* IPv6 capable the last 8 or ten years. >> Today, 2019, sure. 2009, not so sure. > IPv6 been part of the requirements for equipment acquisition since the turn > of the century. Certainly any network hardware all the computer operating > systems and most appliances. People leave it turned off a lot because they > don't have access to networks that support v6, but it's there. >> >>> There >>> haven't been IPv4 addresses available for 3 or so years. >> That's flat not true !! >> There have been and remain so today. > Try to get a v5 CIDR block from ARIN. They were exhausted about 3 years ago. > Even a /24 block. you can still get IP addresses from carriers, but starting > a new ISP and see how far you get finding IP space. >> >>> The only thing >>> I can imagine is that there is some market force at work that is slowing >>> it down. >> That's part of it, yes. >> google is pushing IPv6 hard, but we're getting to the point where google is >> the >> well known extra-legal universal mercenary spy organization. >> ( here's this portable camera/gps which we want you to take into the bath >> room with you >> so that you will have a better user experience. Yeah, right ! ) >> Knowing how evil google has become ( even dropped their moto "don't be >> evil" ) anyone >> *that* evil who favors IPv6 is almost reason enough to run like a raped ape >> ! > Well, that's just silly. Go ahead and mistrust Google but it has nothing to > do with IPv6. IPv6 has such a huge address space, we can discreetly address > every grain of sand in the known universe. I suppose if we all stopped using > NAT at gateways and every device had a unique address, folks lie Google and > NSA could find a way to get up to some mischief. When I started working in > the field, we all used unique addresses because no one could imagine we'd run > out of the 4 octets of addresses. When I got my /24 in the 80's, the folks at > SRI who had the contract to manage domains and addresses tried to talk me > into a /16. I should have taken them up on it. Who knew I'd have a house full > of computers? >> >>> Like all the big carriers that have all the v4 address space >>> have too much control of ICAN. >> No. >> More like the major backbone providers still have a great deal of IPv4 >> equipment >> out there in regular service. They're not going to trash it "just because" ! > All of the equipment in the backbone can do both and have been capable since > the turn of the century. They don't have to "trash" anything, except that it > all becomes too slow pretty frequently. >> >>> They've made some pretty stupid rules >>> around getting v6 address space. Not at all what you'd expect if you >>> wanted to fast track v6 adoption. >> Nobody wants to fast track it, except google of course, and a few >> politicians. >> Basically, the people pushing it are nefarious enough to be reason alone >> to walk away from it at any and every opportunity. >> >> Remember the whole Y2K scares ? >> This is much the same. >> Ho, hum. >> > ___ > Rivendell-dev mailing list > Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org > http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
On 8/20/19 9:25 AM, Cowboy wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:07:11 -0700 Bill Putney wrote: I am amazed at how slow the adoption of IPv6 has been. I'm not. Not at all ! There has been a working set of specs and hardware for almost 2 decades. True ! I don't know of anything built in the last decade that wasn't IPv6 capable. Really ? I'm not aware of much that *was* IPv6 capable the last 8 or ten years. Today, 2019, sure. 2009, not so sure. IPv6 been part of the requirements for equipment acquisition since the turn of the century. Certainly any network hardware all the computer operating systems and most appliances. People leave it turned off a lot because they don't have access to networks that support v6, but it's there. There haven't been IPv4 addresses available for 3 or so years. That's flat not true !! There have been and remain so today. Try to get a v5 CIDR block from ARIN. They were exhausted about 3 years ago. Even a /24 block. you can still get IP addresses from carriers, but starting a new ISP and see how far you get finding IP space. The only thing I can imagine is that there is some market force at work that is slowing it down. That's part of it, yes. google is pushing IPv6 hard, but we're getting to the point where google is the well known extra-legal universal mercenary spy organization. ( here's this portable camera/gps which we want you to take into the bath room with you so that you will have a better user experience. Yeah, right ! ) Knowing how evil google has become ( even dropped their moto "don't be evil" ) anyone *that* evil who favors IPv6 is almost reason enough to run like a raped ape ! Well, that's just silly. Go ahead and mistrust Google but it has nothing to do with IPv6. IPv6 has such a huge address space, we can discreetly address every grain of sand in the known universe. I suppose if we all stopped using NAT at gateways and every device had a unique address, folks lie Google and NSA could find a way to get up to some mischief. When I started working in the field, we all used unique addresses because no one could imagine we'd run out of the 4 octets of addresses. When I got my /24 in the 80's, the folks at SRI who had the contract to manage domains and addresses tried to talk me into a /16. I should have taken them up on it. Who knew I'd have a house full of computers? Like all the big carriers that have all the v4 address space have too much control of ICAN. No. More like the major backbone providers still have a great deal of IPv4 equipment out there in regular service. They're not going to trash it "just because" ! All of the equipment in the backbone can do both and have been capable since the turn of the century. They don't have to "trash" anything, except that it all becomes too slow pretty frequently. They've made some pretty stupid rules around getting v6 address space. Not at all what you'd expect if you wanted to fast track v6 adoption. Nobody wants to fast track it, except google of course, and a few politicians. Basically, the people pushing it are nefarious enough to be reason alone to walk away from it at any and every opportunity. Remember the whole Y2K scares ? This is much the same. Ho, hum. ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:07:11 -0700 Bill Putney wrote: > I am amazed at how slow the adoption of IPv6 has been. I'm not. Not at all ! > There has been a > working set of specs and hardware for almost 2 decades. True ! > I don't know of > anything built in the last decade that wasn't IPv6 capable. Really ? I'm not aware of much that *was* IPv6 capable the last 8 or ten years. Today, 2019, sure. 2009, not so sure. > There > haven't been IPv4 addresses available for 3 or so years. That's flat not true !! There have been and remain so today. > The only thing > I can imagine is that there is some market force at work that is slowing > it down. That's part of it, yes. google is pushing IPv6 hard, but we're getting to the point where google is the well known extra-legal universal mercenary spy organization. ( here's this portable camera/gps which we want you to take into the bath room with you so that you will have a better user experience. Yeah, right ! ) Knowing how evil google has become ( even dropped their moto "don't be evil" ) anyone *that* evil who favors IPv6 is almost reason enough to run like a raped ape ! > Like all the big carriers that have all the v4 address space > have too much control of ICAN. No. More like the major backbone providers still have a great deal of IPv4 equipment out there in regular service. They're not going to trash it "just because" ! > They've made some pretty stupid rules > around getting v6 address space. Not at all what you'd expect if you > wanted to fast track v6 adoption. Nobody wants to fast track it, except google of course, and a few politicians. Basically, the people pushing it are nefarious enough to be reason alone to walk away from it at any and every opportunity. Remember the whole Y2K scares ? This is much the same. Ho, hum. -- Cowboy ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
I am amazed at how slow the adoption of IPv6 has been. There has been a working set of specs and hardware for almost 2 decades. I don't know of anything built in the last decade that wasn't IPv6 capable. There haven't been IPv4 addresses available for 3 or so years. The only thing I can imagine is that there is some market force at work that is slowing it down. Like all the big carriers that have all the v4 address space have too much control of ICAN. They've made some pretty stupid rules around getting v6 address space. Not at all what you'd expect if you wanted to fast track v6 adoption. G - Bill On 8/20/19 8:00 AM, Fred Gleason wrote: On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 14:35 +0200, Gabriele Fergola wrote: Today I tried to pass ipv4 instead of the name and all was working perfectly so probably glasscoder is not managing well ipv6. Is it possible? Possible - and even likely! I've honestly never tried it with IPv6. Cheers! |-| | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer | | | Paravel Systems | |-| | A room without books is like a body without a soul. | | | | -- Cicero | |-| ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev -- Bill Putney - WB6RFW District 2 Commissioner - Port of Port Townsend Chief Engineer - KPTZ El Jefe de Contenido - Port Townsend Film Festival Private Pilot-Single Engine Land | Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic / Inspection Authorization ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
Hello Fred, probably I found the problem. When the system try to resolve my domain name the answer contains both kinds of IP (IPv4 and IPv6): domain.net: domain.net has address 164.132.XXX.XXX domain.net has IPv6 address 2001:41d0:401::X Today I tried to pass ipv4 instead of the name and all was working perfectly so probably glasscoder is not managing well ipv6. Is it possible? Regards Gabriele Il giorno lun 19 ago 2019 alle ore 21:16 Workino ha scritto: > Yea my sorry I wrote all by hand because I was not able to copy and paste. > > Tomorrow I’ll perform some test and I’ll send you feedback > > Thanks > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 19 Aug 2019, at 18:22, Fred Gleason wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 12:51 +0200, Gabriele Fergola wrote: > >> when I'm trying to connect with Icecast 2 : > >> > >> glasscoder --server-type=icecast2 --server-url= > >> http://XXX.XXX.XXX:8015/stream --server-auth-usernam:password -- > >> audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio- > >> bitrate=192 --stream-name="X" --audio-device=jack --jack-client- > >> name="myname" --jack-gain=0 > >> > >> I got this error: > >> > >> glasscoder: server "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" returned > >> unrecognized response > >> glasscoder: connection to "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" lost > > > > You have a typo in the invocation: '--server-auth-usernam:password'; I > > suspect you intended '--server-auth=usernam:password'. > > > > What does the Icecast log say? > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > |-| > > | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer | > > | | Paravel Systems | > > |-| > > | A room without books is like a body without a soul. | > > | | > > | -- Cicero | > > |-| > > > ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
Yea my sorry I wrote all by hand because I was not able to copy and paste. Tomorrow I’ll perform some test and I’ll send you feedback Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On 19 Aug 2019, at 18:22, Fred Gleason wrote: > >> On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 12:51 +0200, Gabriele Fergola wrote: >> when I'm trying to connect with Icecast 2 : >> >> glasscoder --server-type=icecast2 --server-url= >> http://XXX.XXX.XXX:8015/stream --server-auth-usernam:password -- >> audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio- >> bitrate=192 --stream-name="X" --audio-device=jack --jack-client- >> name="myname" --jack-gain=0 >> >> I got this error: >> >> glasscoder: server "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" returned >> unrecognized response >> glasscoder: connection to "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" lost > > You have a typo in the invocation: '--server-auth-usernam:password'; I > suspect you intended '--server-auth=usernam:password'. > > What does the Icecast log say? > > Cheers! > > > |-| > | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer | > | | Paravel Systems | > |-| > | A room without books is like a body without a soul. | > | | > | -- Cicero | > |-| > ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
Re: [RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 12:51 +0200, Gabriele Fergola wrote: > when I'm trying to connect with Icecast 2 : > > glasscoder --server-type=icecast2 --server-url= > http://XXX.XXX.XXX:8015/stream --server-auth-usernam:password -- > audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio- > bitrate=192 --stream-name="X" --audio-device=jack --jack-client- > name="myname" --jack-gain=0 > > I got this error: > > glasscoder: server "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" returned > unrecognized response > glasscoder: connection to "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" lost You have a typo in the invocation: '--server-auth-usernam:password'; I suspect you intended '--server-auth=usernam:password'. What does the Icecast log say? Cheers! |-| | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer | | | Paravel Systems | |-| | A room without books is like a body without a soul. | | | | -- Cicero | |-| ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
[RDD] Glasscoder icecast/shoutcast V1
Hello, today I gave a shoot to glasscoder but I got some trouble. when I'm trying to connect with Icecast 2 : glasscoder --server-type=icecast2 --server-url= http://XXX.XXX.XXX:8015/stream --server-auth-usernam:password --audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio-bitrate=192 --stream-name="X" --audio-device=jack --jack-client-name="myname" --jack-gain=0 I got this error: glasscoder: server "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" returned unrecognized response glasscoder: connection to "radio.workino.net:8015//stream" lost I think the problem can be the double // and with Shoutcast V1 (I'm connecting to a liquidsoap) in the liquidsoap log i can see only really strange characters glasscoder --server-type=Shout1 --server-url=http://xxx.xxx.xxx:8015 --server-auth=username:password --audio-format=mp3 --audio-samplerate=44100 --audio-channels=2 --audio-bitrate=192 --stream-name="The Vintage Club" --audio-device=jack --jack-client-name="GlassMP3" --jack-gain=0 glasscoder: connected to JACK graph at 48000 samples/sec. glasscoder: login to "xxx.xxx.xxx:8015" rejected: Invalid password (all sensible data are hidden) With Darkice all is working. Thanks in advance Gabriele ___ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
