[RDBO] $object-related_iterator
i've skimmed the docs again and don't see it, but is there an easy way to generate _iterator methods for one-to-many relationships? --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] Rose::DB::Object::Column::Serialize?
i am looking to freeze/thaw (or yaml, doesn't really matter..) unblessed data structures into a mysql column. has anyone already written a Column class that handles this transparently? --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] augmenting ManyToMany default_auto_method_types
On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:22 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
On 6/11/07 12:14 PM, Michael Reece wrote:
method_types = [
Rose::DB::Object::Metadata::Relationship::ManyToMany-
default_auto_method_types(),
'count'
],
},
Try:
add_methods = [ 'count' ],
fantastic, thanks.
i am in the process of porting some code from CDBI::Sweet to RDBO,
and one thing that tripped me up trying to use an offset + rows, when
rows s.b. 'limit' for RDBO..
i was getting an error like Could not find MyDB::Message objects -
at ...
after a little digging:
in Rose::DB::Object::Manager, sub get_objects, ~ line 1608:
if(defined $args{'offset'})
{
Carp::croak Offset argument is invalid without a limit argument
unless($args{'limit'} || $manual_limit);
in Rose::DB::Object::MakeMethods::Generic, sub objects_by_map, ~ line
4314:
if($@ || !$objs)
{
$self-error(Could not find $foreign_class objects - .
$map_manager-error);
$self-meta-handle_error($self);
return wantarray ? () : $objs;
}
however, the error is in $@ and not $map_manager-error, so the
reason for the failure is not reported.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] Namespace for 3rd-party RDBO modules
On May 23, 2007, at 10:48 AM, John Siracusa wrote: On 5/23/07 12:53 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: On May 23, 2007, at 9:36 AM, John Siracusa wrote: Does anyone have any good ideas for a namespace for module that augment or extend RDBO, but that are not part of the official RDBO distribution? The first thing that springs to my mind is: Rose::DBx::* At first I really liked that, but then I read... That'd be for both modules that are related to Rose::DB and modules that are related to Rose::DB::Object. Which would make it a bit awkward, I think, in the case of a Rose::DB derived file, and not an object file. How so? My main worry is that Rose::DBx looks similar to Rose::DB Well, DBI did the DBIx thing, and Mason did the MasonX thing. I like Rose::DBx:: more than RoseX::, but I could be persuaded. Rose::Community Rose::Externals Rose::Contributed Those are all way too long :) Rose::xDB might work too - it gets your original point across without looking too much like the real rose namespace. Yeah, that's not bad either. Other opinions? -John i think Rose::DBx is fine, and Rose::DBx::TotallyRad and Rose::DBx::Object::TotallyRad seem clear enough what's what to me. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] cascading Manager queries
in Collection.pm, i have
sub count_assets {
my $self = shift;
return CollectionAsset::Manager-get_collection_assets_count(
require_objects = ['asset'],
query = [ collection_id = $self-
collection_id, @_ ],
);
}
sub count_assets_published {
my $self = shift;
return $self-count_assets('asset.pubstatus' = 'published',
@_);
}
and later:
my $count = $collection-count_assets_published(
[ \'t2.pubdate = NOW() - INTERVAL ? DAY' = $num_days ] #
t2 ~ asset
);
i can't refer to 'asset.pubdate' in this query param, because RDBOM
insists i use a scalar-ref here, and wisely avoids doing
substitutions when handed a scalar-ref, and mysql won't let me refer
to the table by its real name once it has been aliased.. since the
generated query aliases asset as t2, i have to use t2 here, though
not elsewhere. needless to day, it's a little confusing, especially
to future-maintenance-programmer.
any advice?
another thing i am struggling with a bit is allowing such helper
methods to modify both the query and manager_args. in the above
example, require_objects=['asset'] isn't required in the basic case
where it exists, but is there because methods like
count_assets_published need to refer to the assets.. seems common
enough, so maybe there is already a convenient way to merge manager
args in this case?
here is a bit of ugliness that hints at what i am after:
sub count_assets {
my $self = shift;
my ($manager_args, $query_args) =
_separate_manager_query_args(@_);
return Plex::RDBO::CollectionAsset::Manager-
get_collection_assets_count(
@$manager_args,
query = [ collection_id = $self-collection_id, @
$query_args ],
);
}
sub count_assets_published {
my $self = shift;
my ($manager_args, $query_args) =
_separate_manager_query_args(@_);
return $self-count_assets(
require_objects = ['asset'], @$manager_args,
query = [ 'asset.pubstatus' = 'published', @
$query_args ]
);
}
sub _separate_manager_query_args {
my @manager_args = @_;
my @query_args;
foreach my $i (0..$#manager_args) {
if ($manager_args[$i] eq 'query') {
@query_args = @{ (splice @manager_args, $i, 2)[1] };
last;
}
}
return ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]);
}
any advice? ;)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] sort_by computed/aggregate column
i have a Group::Manager query like: my $active = $self-get_groups( distinct = 1, fetch_only = [ $self-object_class-meta-table ], ## silence warning from RDBOM about redundant data -- there is no ## redundant data anyway, because of 'fetch_only' multi_many_ok = 1, require_objects = ['collections.collection_assets'], group_by = 't1.group_id', sort_by = 'COUNT(DISTINCT collection_assets.asset_id) DESC', ); which produces a query that looks (roughly) like SELECT DISTINCT t1.* FROM agroup t1 JOIN (collection t2 JOIN collection_asset t3 ON (t2.collection_id = t3.collection_id)) ON (t1.group_id = t2.group_id) GROUP BY t1.group_id ORDER BY COUNT(DISTINCT t3.asset_id) DESC which works great for mysql 5.0.x, but mysql 4.1.x complains Invalid use of group function and wants me to do something like: SELECT DISTINCT t1.*, COUNT(DISTINCT t3.asset_id) as temp_asset_count FROM agroup t1 JOIN (collection t2 JOIN collection_asset t3 ON (t2.collection_id = t3.collection_id)) ON (t1.group_id = t2.group_id) GROUP BY t1.group_id ORDER BY temp_asset_count DESC but i can't seem to coerce this out of the get_objects() call. here is what i tried: my $active = $self-get_groups( distinct= 1, select = [ 't1.*', 'COUNT(DISTINCT t3.asset_id) as temp_asset_count' ], multi_many_ok = 1, require_objects = ['collections.collection_assets'], group_by= 't1.group_id', sort_by = 'temp_asset_count DESC', ); but the generated query contains ORDER BY t1.temp_asset_count DESC and i can't seem to get the t1. not added to the ORDER BY clause. i know i can resort to get_objects_from_sql, but are there any other suggestions? --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] sort_by computed/aggregate column
On May 15, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Michael Reece wrote: here is what i tried: my $active = $self-get_groups( distinct= 1, select = [ 't1.*', 'COUNT(DISTINCT t3.asset_id) as temp_asset_count' ], multi_many_ok = 1, require_objects = ['collections.collection_assets'], group_by= 't1.group_id', sort_by = 'temp_asset_count DESC', ); but the generated query contains ORDER BY t1.temp_asset_count DESC and i can't seem to get the t1. not added to the ORDER BY clause. i know i can resort to get_objects_from_sql, but are there any other suggestions? FYI, experimentation shows that i can get it to not prefix temp_asset_count with t1. if i add some extra junk: sort_by = ['temp_asset_count DESC, avoid prefixing temp_asset_count'], but, ugh. this brings up another possibly useful feature, which would allow something like discard_columns = ['temp_asset_count'] to keep me from having to set up an accessor for temp_asset_count, which may never be used outside this sort_by clause. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] sort_by computed/aggregate column
On May 15, 2007, at 11:32 AM, John Siracusa wrote: On 5/15/07, Michael Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but the generated query contains ORDER BY t1.temp_asset_count DESC and i can't seem to get the t1. not added to the ORDER BY clause. i know i can resort to get_objects_from_sql, but are there any other suggestions? You're already beyond what the Manager is currently able to do by using the undocumented group_by parameter... true, maybe i should just change it to SQL.. this brings up another possibly useful feature, which would allow something like discard_columns = ['temp_asset_count'] to keep me from having to set up an accessor for temp_asset_count, which may never be used outside this sort_by clause. ...or just don't use MySQL 4 ;) On the sort_by thing, I'll probably add the ability to pass a reference to a scalar which will be taken as a literal. i tried passing a \'' to see if that was already implemented, but it griped it was not an array-ref. ;) - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] re-using relationships with extra conditions
in CDBI (+Sweet), i would do something like this:
Category-has_many(
messages = [ 'CollectionMessage' = 'message' ],
constraint = { 'message.atype' = 'discussion',
'message.pubstatus' = 'published' }
);
sub latest_message {
my $self = shift;
my ($latest) = $self-messages({ order_by = 'pubdate DESC',
rows = 1 });
return $latest;
}
the closest i have come up with in RDBO is:
Category-meta-setup(
# ...
relationships = [
messages = {
type = 'many to many',
map_class = 'CollectionMessage',
map_from = 'category',
map_to = 'message',
query_args = [ 'message.atype' = 'discussion',
'message.pubstatus' = 'published' ]
},
latest_message_map = {
type = 'many to many',
map_class= 'CollectionMessage',
map_from = 'category',
map_to = 'message',
query_args = [ 'message.atype' = 'discussion',
'message.pubstatus' = 'published' ],
manager_args = { sort_by = 'message.pubdate DESC',
limit = 1 }
}
]
);
sub latest_message {
my $self = shift;
my $latest = $self-latest_message_map;
return $latest $latest-[0];
}
i guess i have three questions.
1. is there a way to pull that off with 'one to one' type
relationship so i can drop the subroutine?
2. or is there a way to tack on extra conditions (or custom ordering)
to existing relationships, so i can keep the subroutine and drop the
extra relationship?
(what Class::DBI calls Limiting: http://search.cpan.org/~tmtm/Class-
DBI-v3.0.16/lib/Class/DBI.pm#Limiting )
3. am i missing some other RDBO magic that would make this easier?
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] re-using relationships with extra conditions
i forgot about that new feature! upgraded and tested, works great! On May 11, 2007, at 12:18 PM, John Siracusa wrote: On 5/11/07, Michael Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. is there a way to pull that off with 'one to one' type relationship so i can drop the subroutine? Not unless you add an is_latest column or something to the table. 2. or is there a way to tack on extra conditions (or custom ordering) to existing relationships, so i can keep the subroutine and drop the extra relationship? Check out the find method type: $latest = $o-find_messages(sort_by = 'message.pubdate DESC', limit = 1)-[0]; I guess you'd still want to wrap that in a nice method name, but at least you don't have to create a new relationship. -John -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] auto_prime_caches, or common custom Metadata
my $dbh isn't available at the time that mod_perl starts up. after a couple hours of debugging, i figured out that i need to pass auto_prime_caches = 0, to __PACKAGE__-meta-setup(...) however, i have a lot of classes. is there a way to add this behavior (or other similar metadata) to the base class (say, My::RDBO)? --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] auto_prime_caches, or common custom Metadata
here's what i came up with:
in package My::RDBO::_base,
sub meta_class { 'My::RDBO::_meta' }
and then,
package My::RDBO::_meta;
use base 'Rose::DB::Object::Metadata';
sub auto_prime_caches { 0 }
1;
is this the expected way to do this sort of thing?
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Michael Reece wrote:
my $dbh isn't available at the time that mod_perl starts up. after a
couple hours of debugging, i figured out that i need to pass
auto_prime_caches = 0,
to __PACKAGE__-meta-setup(...)
however, i have a lot of classes. is there a way to add this
behavior (or other similar metadata) to the base class (say,
My::RDBO)?
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
---
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] unexpected fetchrow_array in scalar context
On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:17 PM, John Siracusa wrote: On 3/7/07, Michael Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this was causing me problems (always getting counts of 1) because my DBI abstraction layer re-implements fetchrow_array, only ever returning a list. Well there's your problem :) indeed! [...] For these reasons you should exercise some caution if you use fetchrow_array in a scalar context. [...] the last sentence does provide a warning, so perhaps you can be convinced to change RDBOM line 1500 to ($count) = $sth-fetchrow_array; In this case, I know that I'm only ever fetching one column (COUNT(*)), so there's no ambiguity. I admit no wrongdoing; I'm following the letter of the DBI spec! :) But I'll change it just for you... ;) (in SVN) -John thanks! - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] inflating/deflating columns using mysql functions
making some progress, but it appears select_sql doesn't get triggered when fetching lazy=1 columns. On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Siracusa wrote: On 2/28/07, Michael Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it possible to inflate/deflate columns using mysql functions via RDBO? If you're feeling daring, this API is still not public, but I'm pretty sure it still works: http://www.mail-archive.com/rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net/ msg00710.html I haven't change it in a long time so it'll probably just become public eventually, assuming I haven't made any fatal mistakes in the API. If you try it, let me know how it works for you. As for doing it client-side in Perl... as an alternate solution, i am considering doing all the de/cryption work in perl, with the idea that i can inflate/deflate columns using RDBO triggers, but this part has me worried (re: inflate, deflate triggers): Note that the value to be inflated may have come from the database, or from end-user code. Be prepared to handle almost anything. since the de/crypt should only happen with values to/from the db, not from end-user code. That's no problem, you just have to be prepared to handle both cases :) You can detect where data is coming from and going to by using the is_loading() and is_saving() utility functions: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB-Object/lib/Rose/DB/Object/Util.pm Then just do the appropriate thing in each situation. -John -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] inflating/deflating columns using mysql functions
this is what i am working with so far and works ok if all rows have
the same encryption key:
package RM::DB::Column::AESCrypt;
use base 'Rose::DB::Object::Metadata::Column::Blob';
sub select_sql {
my $self = shift;
my $value = q{AES_DECRYPT(body, 'SECRET')};
return $value;
}
sub query_placeholder_sql {
my $self = shift;
my $value = q{AES_ENCRYPT(?, 'SECRET')};
return $value;
}
*insert_placeholder_sql = \query_placeholder_sql;
*update_placeholder_sql = \query_placeholder_sql;
1;
any suggestions on how to get 'SECRET' to come from the object, which
does not appear to be passed to these subs?
On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Michael Reece wrote:
this looks very promising! but what args are passed to select_sql,
etc?
that is, from RM::DB::Column::AESCrypt sub select_sql, how can i
inspect the row/object to use its special crypt key?
On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
On 2/28/07, Michael Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it possible to inflate/deflate columns using mysql functions via
RDBO?
If you're feeling daring, this API is still not public, but I'm
pretty
sure it still works:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net/
msg00710.html
I haven't change it in a long time so it'll probably just become
public eventually, assuming I haven't made any fatal mistakes in the
API. If you try it, let me know how it works for you.
As for doing it client-side in Perl...
as an alternate solution, i am considering doing all the de/cryption
work in perl, with the idea that i can inflate/deflate columns using
RDBO triggers, but this part has me worried (re: inflate, deflate
triggers):
Note that the value to be inflated may have come from the
database, or from end-user code. Be prepared to handle almost
anything.
since the de/crypt should only happen with values to/from the db,
not
from end-user code.
That's no problem, you just have to be prepared to handle both
cases
:) You can detect where data is coming from and going to by using
the
is_loading() and is_saving() utility functions:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB-Object/lib/Rose/DB/Object/Util.pm
Then just do the appropriate thing in each situation.
-John
-
-
---
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
---
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] Last call before 0.761
MySQL, correctly, says the default is NULL:
i was say erroneously, not correctly.
if you try this:
insert into bars set id=1 ;
select * from bars ;
you will see that the foo column is '', not NULL, suggesting the
default really is ''.
On Feb 21, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 10:00, John Siracusa wrote:
I'm going to release 0.761 shortly. If you have any outstanding bugs
not fixed in SVN or any other small suggestions, speak now...
Maybe this is something, once again, that I am doing wrong - but I
don't understand this:
mysql 5.0.27 and DBD::mysql 3.0008:
create table bars (id int unsigned not null primary key, foo varchar
(255) not null) engine = InnoDB;
gets me (with the auto loader):
__PACKAGE__-meta-setup(
table = 'bars',
columns = [
id = { type = 'integer', not_null = 1 },
foo = { type = 'varchar', default = '', length = 255,
not_null = 1 },
],
primary_key_columns = [ 'id' ],
);
Note the default to foo.
mysql show create table bars\G
*** 1. row ***
Table: bars
Create Table: CREATE TABLE `bars` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`foo` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
mysql select * from information_schema.columns where table_schema =
'ntppool' and table_name = 'bars' and column_name = 'foo' \G
*** 1. row ***
TABLE_CATALOG: NULL
TABLE_SCHEMA: ntppool
TABLE_NAME: bars
COLUMN_NAME: foo
ORDINAL_POSITION: 2
COLUMN_DEFAULT: NULL
IS_NULLABLE: NO
DATA_TYPE: varchar
CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH: 255
CHARACTER_OCTET_LENGTH: 255
NUMERIC_PRECISION: NULL
NUMERIC_SCALE: NULL
CHARACTER_SET_NAME: latin1
COLLATION_NAME: latin1_swedish_ci
COLUMN_TYPE: varchar(255)
COLUMN_KEY:
EXTRA:
PRIVILEGES: select,insert,update,references
COLUMN_COMMENT:
1 row in set (0.03 sec)
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
--
---
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] incorrect column type for double precision?
in a postgres table, i have a column
lat| double precision
the column definitions spit out from $class-meta-
perl_class_definition interpreted this as
lat= { type = 'scalar', length = 8 },
but RDBOM carps
get_objects() - Vinq::RDBO::Image: Value for lat() is too long.
Maximum length is 8 characters. Value is 16 characters:
37.3960614524039 at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Rose/
Object.pm line 25
any suggestions for the proper type to declare for double precision
columns?
% perl -MRose::DB::Object -MRose::DB::Object::Manager -e 'print
RDBO: $Rose::DB::Object::VERSION; RDBOM::
$Rose::DB::Object::Manager::VERSION\n'
RDBO: 0.760; RDBOM:: 0.759
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] overloading Rose::DB-dbh
trying every which way to make Rose::DB::Object(s) always use my
custom global $dbh,
package Vinq::RDB::MySQL;
use base 'Rose::DB';
use Vinq::Globals qw( $dbh );
__PACKAGE__-use_private_registry;
__PACKAGE__-register_db(driver = 'mysql');
sub dbh { $dbh }
sub driver { 'mysql' }
1;
things were working great until i tried to
$junk-add_stuff({ name = 'stuff 1' });
$junk-save;
which leads to a '$db-commit or die $db-error;', but commit() says
(in Rose/DB.pm):
sub commit
{
my($self) = shift;
return 0 unless(defined $self-{'dbh'} $self-{'dbh'}
{'Active'});
my $dbh = $self-dbh or return undef;
...
but while $self-dbh returns my $dbh, $self-{'dbh'} hasn't been set
so it dies (with no error).
are there any docs/tutorials/testimonials about successfully using
your own $dbh?
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] timezone for magical 'now' value in datetime columns
if i do something like
$obj-my_date('now');
$obj-save;
i get UTC times. i see that i can define the column as
saved_on = { type = 'datetime', time_zone = 'America/New_York' }
and get the right datetime value, but is there an easy way to
influence the timezone on all DateTime objects created by
Rose::DB::Object?
---
michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
[RDBO] auto_initialize from custom $dbh
i am getting the following error when trying to auto_initialize a
table class from a custom $dbh:
Could not auto-retrieve primary key columns for class My::Junk -
no primary key info found for catalog '' schema '' table 'junk'
the table is very simple:
mysql create table junk ( junk_id int auto_increment primary key,
name varchar(32) ) ;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.09 sec)
mysql show create table junk\G
*** 1. row ***
Table: junk
Create Table: CREATE TABLE `junk` (
`junk_id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`name` varchar(32) default NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`junk_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql insert into junk set name = 'one' ;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
mysql insert into junk set name = 'two' ;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql select * from junk ;
+-+--+
| junk_id | name |
+-+--+
| 1 | one |
| 2 | two |
+-+--+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
here is my test script:
% cat auto.pl
#!perl
use strict; use warnings;
## Set up $dbh
use Vinq::Globals qw($dbh);
BEGIN { Vinq::Globals-init(confName = 'plexmreece') }
BEGIN {
## verify $dbh is working
my $sth = $dbh-prepare('SELECT COUNT(1) FROM junk');
$sth-execute;
print got , $sth-fetchrow_array, junks from dbh $dbh\n;
}
package My::Junk;
use base 'Rose::DB::Object';
use Vinq::Globals qw($dbh);
sub init_db {
print Setting up Rose::DB with dbh = $dbh\n;
return Rose::DB-new(dbh = $dbh, driver = 'mysql');
}
__PACKAGE__-meta-table('junk');
__PACKAGE__-meta-auto_initialize;
and here is the output:
% perl auto.pl
got 2 junks from dbh Vinq::DB=HASH(0x8832a74)
Setting up Rose::DB with dbh = Vinq::DB=HASH(0x8832a74)
Setting up Rose::DB with dbh = Vinq::DB=HASH(0x8832a74)
Setting up Rose::DB with dbh = Vinq::DB=HASH(0x8832a74)
Could not auto-retrieve primary key columns for class My::Junk - no
primary key info found for catalog '' schema '' table 'junk' at
auto.pl line 28
am i missing something? do i need to tell Rose::DB more about the
dbh i am injecting?
% perl -MRose::DB -MRose::DB::Object -e 'print Rose::DB
$Rose::DB::VERSION\nRose::DB::Object $Rose::DB::Object::VERSION\n'
Rose::DB 0.732
Rose::DB::Object 0.760
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] Rose::DB::Object thingy like class::dbi's set_sql?
All of that said, adding iterator options to get_objects_from_sql() and make_manager_method_from_sql() is pretty simple. If you really want it, I'll throw it in the next release :) yes, please! On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:33 PM, John Siracusa wrote: On 11/28/06, George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like I might be able to figure out how to get RDO::Manager to express the query, but it would be quicker (at least as a first cut to be able to do something like Foo::DB::Moose::Manager-get_iterator_from_sql(blahblahblah); I haven't seen anything in my dives into the docs. Is it possible? Can you give me a pointer? The get_objects_from_sql() Manager method will fetch objects based on hand-coded SQL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB-Object/lib/Rose/DB/Object/ Manager.pm#get_objects_from_sql but it will return all the objects at once. Another Manager method, make_manager_method_from_sql(), will create a method based on your hand-coded SQL. This is a bit more like CDBI's set_sql method. http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB-Object/lib/Rose/DB/Object/ Manager.pm#make_manager_method_from_sql But again, it returns all the objects at once. There's currently no iterator-based variant of those two methods. (Coming from CDBI, that shouldn't bother you too much, however, since the last time I checked, CDBI fetches all the rows from the database before allowing the first iteration anyway. The iterators used by the RDBO Manager, OTOH, fetch rows on demand, in response to each iteration.) All of that said, adding iterator options to get_objects_from_sql() and make_manager_method_from_sql() is pretty simple. If you really want it, I'll throw it in the next release :) -John -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object --- michael reece :: software engineer :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
