Re: Mass rebuild results for F41

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I have untagged all the fc39 packages that were ftbfs during the f40 
mass rebuild and intend to retire them



Package: dega-sdl
Package: dvd95
Package: gambatte
Package: gens
Package: lxdream
Package: lxdvdrip
Package: mamory
Package: mate-applet-streamer
Package: tilem


On 05/08/2024 15:39, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi,

Mass rebuild for F39 is finished  .

you may see updated list here:
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html

Failed builds: 17
 Package: deadbeef
 Package: dega-sdl
 Package: dosemu
 Package: dvd95
 Package: freeguide
 Package: gambatte
 Package: gens
 Package: gr-dab
 Package: lxdream
 Package: lxdvdrip
 Package: mamory
 Package: mate-applet-streamer
 Package: olive
 Package: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld
 Package: telegram-desktop
 Package: tilem
 Package: tvheadend

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646849 deadbeef
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=648221 dega-sdl
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646892 dosemu
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646966 dvd95
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646971 freeguide
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647338 gambatte
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=648293 gens
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646503 gr-dab
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647353 lxdream
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647356 lxdvdrip
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647358 mamory
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647291 mate-applet-
streamer
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647471 olive
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647569 qt5-qtwebengine-
freeworld
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=648447 telegram-desktop
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647655 tilem
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647661 tvheadend

Best regards

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

test

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

test
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Introduction

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Hi,


I don't see any FAS request, see 
https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Get_an_RPM_Fusion_Account


On 26/05/2024 12:36, robert.mader--- via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi!

My name is Robert Mader and I've been contributing to various FLOSS projects 
over the last years, notably Gnome Mutter and Firefox. For about the same time 
I've been a Fedora and rpmfusion user and am deeply grateful for this project 
and your work.

The main reason I'm introducing myself here is that I'd like to land 
https://github.com/rpmfusion/libva-intel-driver/pull/3 for my beloved Thinkpad 
T400 - and was asked to help with maintaining that package in 
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6894 - which, given its low 
development activity, is something I can do I think :)

Thus I'd like to apply for a maintainer role for libva-intel-driver.

Best regards!

Relevant accounts:
  - https://gitlab.gnome.org/rmader
  - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/rmader
  - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=588045
  - https://floss.social/@rmader
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Builder hosts CA file

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I believe it's due to our old infra, see these mock commits


https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arpm-software-management%2Fmock+ca-certificates&type=commits


On 22/05/2024 14:30, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Le mer. 22 mai 2024 à 08:06, Nicolas Chauvet  a écrit :

Le mar. 21 mai 2024 à 23:55, Michael Cronenworth via
rpmfusion-developers  a
écrit :

Hi all,

I am attempting to build Jellyfin 10.9 for Rawhide, but I am running into an
error[1] with dotnet unable to verify the package signatures of the build 
modules.

The package signatures can be verified on my local system with mock (Rawhide) 
but
fail on the RPMFusion Koji build hosts.

I added a grep command[2] to see if the CA exists in the Koji build host, and
surprisingly it does not exist. It does exist on my local copy.

Are the Koji builders CA files being modified?

Thanks,
Michael

[1] https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=640879
[2] https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=640911

Hi Michael,

I'm not sure why the CA from the koji builder host should be used,
compared to the CA of the fedora buildroot populated for the given
target ?

I've updated the ca-certificates package from the koji host, but I
don't get why this bundle would be used into the buildroot rather than
the one from the buildroot

I don't get why my resubmit of your same job went later (and stopped
with a crash), while

It could be because we are using a old fedora host as builder, but
it's still weird.

Can we track this on a dedicated bugzilla infra ticket ?  I will have
to escalate this to mock maintainers...

Thanks in advance.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: F40 final freeze next week

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I have untagged the latest nvidia 304xx builds for f40+ due to gcc-14 
build failure.



On 28/03/2024 21:17, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Le mar. 26 mars 2024 à 16:16, Nicolas Chauvet  a écrit :

Hi there,

Just a reminder that the final freeze is in one week (and this
week-end will be Easter for some).
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-all-tasks.html

Please list any action you want to have in f40 buildroot by default.

Also remind that legacy nvidia drivers are untagged for f40 as it's
not clear if there are active maintainers. Please volunteer and take
over maintenance in pkgdb, you will just need to rebuild the packages
for f40 to re-introduce them.


dnf repoclosure (on f41) shows:

package: qmmp-plugins-freeworld-2.1.5-3.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide
   unresolved deps (1):
 qmmp(x86-64) = 2.1.5
package: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.16-1.fc40.x86_64 from
rpmfusion-free-rawhide
   unresolved deps (1):
 qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.12
...
package: vdr-plex-0.4.0-38.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide
   unresolved deps (4):
 libPocoXML.so.94()(64bit)
 libPocoFoundation.so.94()(64bit)
 libPocoNet.so.94()(64bit)
 libPocoNetSSL.so.94()(64bit)
---

qmmp-plugins-freeworld is rawhide only, but please check for others.

Until we will have a RPM Fusion GA repository matching the Fedora GA
one, please hold (or at least mention) any updates that should be
published as 0-day updates.


Thanks
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [bino] Update bino to 2.1

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Why didn't the cunt inform us instead of wasting my fucking time!

On 26/03/2024 07:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via 
rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Tuesday, 26 March 2024 at 01:44, Leigh Scott wrote:

commit 18bfd88a84df92c3efb1d7729eab367a85247230
Author: Leigh Scott 
Date:   Tue Mar 26 00:44:36 2024 +

 Update bino to 2.1

Uhm. It should be retired instead:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bino

Regards,
Dominik

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [compat-ffmpeg5] No longer needed

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

F40 build is also dropped.

I think we should also consider compat-ffmep4 future.



On 23/03/2024 13:04, Sérgio Basto wrote:


And in F40 ? compat-ffmpeg5 will be dropped also ?

On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 13:00 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:

commit b9f004a649292480fd6649f0123ca275b4cad6f1
Author: Leigh Scott 
Date:   Sat Mar 23 12:00:56 2024 +

     No longer needed

  .gitignore  |   2 -
  compat-ffmpeg5.spec | 375 --
--
  dead.package    |   1 +
  ffmpeg-devel.asc    |  30 -
  sources |   2 -
  5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 409 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dead.package b/dead.package
new file mode 100644
index 000..8dd89b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dead.package
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+No longer needed
___
rpmfusion-commits mailing list --
rpmfusion-comm...@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-commits-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Kodi 21

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Kodi is in a pitiful state due to their stale code, version 20 isn't a 
good fit for any current fedora release.



1: it needs a dead ffmpeg version, I had to drop nvdec support recently.

2: it isn't compatible with current python without patching.

3: because of 2# the downloaded plugins aren't always compatible.


I see no reason why f40  should ship with version 20  as it isn't even 
that stable with f39.



On 13/03/2024 20:37, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Thanks for rising the point of Kodi update


I see little point to update Kodi to a New version for F40 unless WE 
are sure that no regression occured ... Specially not until thé full 
set of Kodi modules are fully validated


Not having newer Kodi in F40 means having a way for end -users to 
downgrade to the GA version.


To the contrary, I have no problem to have newer Kodi as a 0 day 
update for f40.



Hope this helps

Le mer. 13 mars 2024, 05:43, Michael Cronenworth via 
rpmfusion-developers  a écrit :


On 3/12/24 1:30 PM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> I have the kodi, kodi-inputstream-adaptive, and pvr.hdhomerun
changes queued up
> and ready to commit to F40+. I'll commit them in a few hours
unless there are
> objections.

The update has been pushed to Rawhide (F41) and all three packages
successfully
built. I'll push to F40 tomorrow.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email torpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Kodi 21

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

+1 for new kodi for f40+, maybe f39 can be added later.

-1 for adding GLES


On 12/03/2024 04:12, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi all,

Kodi 21 has its first release candidate now available.

Key features:
- HDR (It works, I've tested it!)
- Better Pipewire support
- Works better with FFMpeg 6 / Python 3.12+

Requirements:
- Addon rebuilds (such as Inputstream Adaptive)
- Compile time only requirement on apache-groovy (binary Java Jar)

HDR requirements:
- GLES renderer (we do not ship this today, should we? other distros do)
- GBM window (no X11, no Wayland compositor)

Caveats so far:
My test system is running a AMD Ryzen 5 3400G CPU and when using the 
GLES renderer it appears frame limited to 18-19 FPS. This is less then 
ideal when almost all media is ~24 FPS. I have not spent any 
troubleshoot time yet on why the FPS is low.


This is a general announcement. I'd like to introduce Kodi 21 RC1 to 
Rawhide ASAP. I would also like to propose to push it into Fedora 40. 
Thoughts?


Regards,
Michael
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I have untagged the FTI packages.


1: EmptyEpsilon

2: etlegacy


package: EmptyEpsilon-2021.06.23-6.fc40.x86_64 from 
rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide

  unresolved deps (5):
    libsfml-audio.so.2.5()(64bit)
    libsfml-graphics.so.2.5()(64bit)
    libsfml-network.so.2.5()(64bit)
    libsfml-system.so.2.5()(64bit)
    libsfml-window.so.2.5()(64bit)
package: etlegacy-2.81.1-2.fc39.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide
  unresolved deps (1):
    libminizip.so.3()(64bit)


On 04/02/2024 14:38, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi,

F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion Finished !

https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html (this link is updated
manually be me from time to time)


ATM:
Last run: 2024-02-04 14:27:38.000757 UTC

Failed builds: 36
 Package: EmptyEpsilon
 Package: HandBrake
 Package: amule
 Package: avidemux
 Package: comskip
 Package: dega-sdl
 Package: desmume
 Package: dvd95
 Package: etlegacy
 Package: gambatte
 Package: gens
 Package: girl
 Package: gltron
 Package: gpac
 Package: gstreamer1-plugins-icamerasrc
 Package: gtetrinet
 Package: jellyfin
 Package: lha
 Package: libde265
 Package: libfame
 Package: libftl
 Package: libmpeg3
 Package: lxdream
 Package: lxdvdrip
 Package: mamory
 Package: mate-applet-streamer
 Package: mixxx
 Package: mp3splt-gtk
 Package: rtmpdump
 Package: streamripper
 Package: swftools
 Package: tilem
 Package: torrentzip
 Package: x264
 Package: xbill
 Package: xpra-codecs-freeworld

These 3 are not built by option of maintainers (have the noautobuild
flag)

Packages not built: 3
 Package: chromium-freeworld, repo = f40-free
 Package: kodi, repo = f40-free
 Package: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia, repo = f40-nonfree



On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 12:37 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

Hi there,

As the mass rebuild is currently occurring in fedora we'd better
wait
for it's publication , also there are probably some pending ABI
update
in fedora side waiting for the mass rebuilt to end:
At least I've noted:
- opencv
- vmaf
- libplacebo  - btw,  I would appreciate to hand-over this package
to
Vitaly (mpv maintainer) and the multimedia-sig

https://code.videolan.org/videolan/vlc/-/merge_requests/3950

Fedora disabled libplacebo for vlc in rawhide but not for F39

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vlc/blob/rawhide/f/vlc.spec#_12

Only ffmpeg, mpv and vlc depends libplacebo

I'm testing build latest libpalcebo for fedora 38+ on my copr repo
builds_for_Stable_Releases

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/builds_for_Stable_Releases/builds/


- any others ? (including rpmfusion specific ones ?)



jpegxl and protobuf


about jpegxl from
https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/releases/tag/v0.9.0
release we can read "API: the Butteraugli API (jxl/butteraugli.h) was
removed." (you should join to #multimedia:fedoraproject.org at matix)

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/aomedia/issues/detail?id=3457 upstream
was
aware of deprecation and removal(edited)


actually of removal as well
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/aomedia/issues/detail?id=3456

so I postpone jpegxl



Once done, anyone to handle the mass rebuild ? and help with
failure
and fix coordination ?

Thanks in advance.



--
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: scm issues?

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

It's probably due to the load from regen tasks currently running.

On 18/12/2023 13:01, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I'm trying to do a pull on nonfree/unifi in master and it took about 3 
minutes to complete.


Thanks,
Richard

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: shotcut needs a rebuild for qt6 version 6.6 for F-38

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I have untagged the broken build


$ koji-rpmfusion untag-build f38-free-updates-testing 
shotcut-23.11.04-1.fc38



On 19/11/2023 10:15, Dan Horák via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hello,

seems the shotcut-23.11.04-1.fc38 build has been done with qt6 version
6.5 in the buildroot, but qt6 has been rebased to 6.6 in the meantime.
The F-39 and Rawhide builds of shotcut look good to me.


Thanks,

Dan
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Stuck PPC build?

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I have reassigned the task


$ koji-rpmfusion assign-task -f 614378 buildppcle-01.osuosl.rpmfusion.net
assigned task 614378 to host buildppcle-01.osuosl.rpmfusion.net


On 20/10/2023 13:12, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I'm working on updating unifi but the f39 package seems to be stuck 
building:


https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=614375

I decided to try and cancel it so I could restart the build before 
submitting a ticket but that's not working for me either:


$ koji-rpmfusion cancel 614375
2023-10-20 07:09:44,934 [ERROR] koji: GenericError: Invalid method: 
getKojiVersion


Any ideas?

Thanks,
Richard

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild results for F39

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I have already worked around the koji issue.

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/externalrepoinfo?extrepoID=168

On 18/08/2023 08:35, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Le ven. 18 août 2023 à 09:08, Leigh Scott  a écrit :

How does changing our proxy fix  broken mock?

It will not fix mock, but it should workaround our build in koji.
Alternative is to put openh264 in our override repo for f40.



Changing $releasever  to 39 on this line will workarround the mock issue.

https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion/blob/master/etc/mock/templates/rpmfusion_free-rawhide.tpl#L22

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild results for F39

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

How does changing our proxy fix  broken mock?

Changing $releasever  to 39 on this line will workarround the mock issue.

https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion/blob/master/etc/mock/templates/rpmfusion_free-rawhide.tpl#L22


On 18/08/2023 07:59, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Le ven. 18 août 2023 à 08:46, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
 a écrit :

You can't be serious, an empty repo doesn't count as working.

https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/40/x86_64/os/

I can workaround the problem in our proxy (to point to 39 until fixed).


I will remove open264 support from our ffmpeg package if this fedora

Please don't, we will only trade one problem for another without fixing.

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild results for F39

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

You can't be serious, an empty repo doesn't count as working.

https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/40/x86_64/os/


I will remove open264 support from our ffmpeg package if this fedora 
repo  isn't fixed by Monday, it doesn't bother me if I break the fdora 
obs-studio package.



On 18/08/2023 00:53, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 15:41 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:

but mock fails because the openh264 repos for rawhide are returning
http 404. I'll give it some time to settle then will try again later.

but is a problem of mock repos configuration or mirrors ?

from mock configuration [1] we got
metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-cisco-openh264-40&arch=x86_64

and is working ATM , anyway this repo is from Fedora not RPMFusion

[1]
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion/commit/3be5610f62afe829c43921df72b8ed983f8a7e9b


___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild results for F39

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Test.

On 08/08/2023 15:31, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

no problem
  
I have already resubmitted the builds and they are completed


Thank you

On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 13:19 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:

Thanks Sergio. I just left town for work and will resubmit after i
return.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android

From: Sérgio Basto 
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:39:27 AM
To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list

Cc: Andrew Bauer 
Subject: Re: Mass rebuild results for F39



is unblocked now, should work now , please resubmit it , thanks,


On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 12:18 +, Andrew Bauer via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

Freeguide has been successfully built on rawhide. I requested el8
and el9 branches for the package as well.

Note that Koji is telling me the package is blocked for f37 and f38
branches:
BuildError: package freeguide is blocked for tag f38-free-updates-
candidate

Note sure what that is about.

Thanks,
Andy

No Trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

From: Sérgio Basto 
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:01 PM
To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list

Cc: Andrew Bauer 
Subject: Re: Mass rebuild results for F39
  


I added you as admin of freeguide , tomorrow after 12 UTC , you
should have permissions


On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 17:21 +, Andrew Bauer via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

I'm not sure how relevant the freeguide package is anymore, but I
went ahead and fixed it.
It just needed its min Java source number bumped up.

However, I don't seem to have permission to push changes to this
package repo.  Can someone add me?

FAS username = kni

Thanks,
Andy

No Trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly
inconvenienced.

From: Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers

Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 8:15 AM
To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list

Cc: Vascom ; Sérgio Basto 
Subject: Re: Mass rebuild results for F39
  
Thank you


https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html updated

7 packages to go

Failed builds: 7
     Package: d1x
     Package: freeguide
     Package: gsview
     Package: lives
     Package: mplayer
     Package: pcsx2
     Package: telegram-desktop

On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 09:14 +0300, Vascom via rpmfusion-
developers
wrote:

Motion build fixed.

сб, 5 авг. 2023 г. в 14:47, Vascom :

Motion fix on the way.
May be 2-3 days.

пт, 4 авг. 2023 г., 05:16 Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers
:

Hi,

Mass rebuild for F39 is complete .

And we have this failures :
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html

Failed builds: 17
     Package: EmptyEpsilon
     Package: audacity-freeworld
     Package: cannonball
     Package: d1x
     Package: deadbeef
     Package: freeguide
     Package: fs-uae-arcade
     Package: fs-uae-launcher
     Package: gsview
     Package: libheif
     Package: lives
     Package: motion
     Package: mplayer
     Package: openmw
     Package: pcsx2
     Package: telegram-desktop
     Package: vo-amrwbenc

in html page you have links for the build failures on koji

and as libheif is in Fedora only 16 packages counts

Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org



___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Mass rebuild results for F39

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

These are either retired,

Package: openmw

 or moved to fedora.

Package: vo-amrwbenc

On 04/08/2023 03:15, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi,

Mass rebuild for F39 is complete .

And we have this failures :
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html

Failed builds: 17
 Package: EmptyEpsilon
 Package: audacity-freeworld
 Package: cannonball
 Package: d1x
 Package: deadbeef
 Package: freeguide
 Package: fs-uae-arcade
 Package: fs-uae-launcher
 Package: gsview
 Package: libheif
 Package: lives
 Package: motion
 Package: mplayer
 Package: openmw
 Package: pcsx2
 Package: telegram-desktop
 Package: vo-amrwbenc

in html page you have links for the build failures on koji

and as libheif is in Fedora only 16 packages counts

Best regards,

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: orphaning mplayer

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Most of these are available. https://itsfoss.com/video-players-linux/

On 02/06/2023 12:41, Eric Sokolowsky wrote:

Besides mpv and vlc, is there another movie player that is still maintained?

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:02 AM Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
 wrote:

On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 13:08 +0100, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:

Do we really need to keep this legacy player around?

Are you going to fix issues like this?


I will try , I like have a fallback


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6692



The bug was opened today



Upstream is virtually dead.


https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/mplayer.git/shortlog


Thank you for the tip


On 30/05/2023 11:09, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

   2022-02-27, Sunday :: MPlayer 1.5 released , I take it

On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 11:16 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi!

I decided to orphan mplayer as I haven't used it for years. Feel
free
to
pick it up.

Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times
and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
  -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess
Irulan
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: orphaning mplayer

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Do we really need to keep this legacy player around?

Are you going to fix issues like this?


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6692


Upstream is virtually dead.


https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/mplayer.git/shortlog


On 30/05/2023 11:09, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

  2022-02-27, Sunday :: MPlayer 1.5 released , I take it

On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 11:16 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi!

I decided to orphan mplayer as I haven't used it for years. Feel free
to
pick it up.

Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
     -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess
Irulan
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: chromium-freeworld is discontinued

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I never enabled vaapi support by default, users need to enable that 
themselves as chromium support for it is a mess.


Fedora chromium enables it by default.


 Version Information

Data exported
2023-03-30T10:46:18.434Z
Chrome version
Chrome/111.0.5563.146
Operating system
Linux 6.2.8-300.fc38.x86_64
Software rendering list URL
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2b5ec366bb5b68dacca9719d5d83cb7e61fb6431/gpu/config/software_rendering_list.json
Driver bug list URL
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2b5ec366bb5b68dacca9719d5d83cb7e61fb6431/gpu/config/gpu_driver_bug_list.json
ANGLE commit id
unknown hash
2D graphics backend
Skia/111 59932b057f281ddaeb0926ecfac55486270f8c51
Command Line
/usr/bin/chromium-browser --enable-plugins --enable-extensions 
--enable-user-scripts --enable-printing --enable-gpu-rasterization 
--enable-sync 
--disable-features=AudioServiceSandbox,UseChromeOSDirectVideoDecoder 
--enable-features=VaapiVideoDecoder,VaapiVideoEncoder 
--auto-ssl-client-auth --flag-switches-begin --enable-smooth-scrolling 
--flag-switches-end


On 30/03/2023 09:53, Tomasz Torcz via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:48:07AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet via 
rpmfusion-developers wrote:

FYI

chromium-freewold is now discontinued, as Leigh has dropped it.
As fedora chromium is now capable of enabling codecs given the
availability in system ffmpeg, it's now the way forward.

See alsohttps://twitter.com/rpmfusion_team/status/1641336945866309634

   Were the codecs only difference? What about video-decode acceleration 
(libva)?
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID d651ff2e: BAD

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I don't think a +2 release upgrade is a valid test case, I believe f37 
is SHA256 signed.



On 19/02/2023 22:41, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Hi,

I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
branched I got a lot of [1] the  key ID d651ff2e is "our" key RPM-GPG-
KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-2020

For an introduction to this topic I recommend this 2 articles [2] .

In resume rpm sign with SHA1 aren't installed in F38 unless we change
the defaul crypto police (update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY) , I
wrote in
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/header-v3-rsa-sha1-signature-key-id-d651ff2e-bad/42350/4
one solution .

And I have checked all rpmfusion packages with fc36 have SHA1 when now
we need to have SHA256 , ATM I found these 5 packages [3] , which I
will rebuild it to be signed again or have you other suggestions ?

Best regards,

[3]
rfpkg-minimal-0.4.2-1.fc36.noarch.rpm
rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-35-1.fc36.noarch.rpm
wormsofprey-data-20051221-15.fc36.noarch.rpm
lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-3.fc36.noarch.rpm
lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts-1.0-3.fc36.noarch.rpm




[1]
Running transaction check
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#1777
Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID d651ff2e: BAD
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK

[2]
https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2023/01/31/error-rpmdbnextiterator-skipping-in-fedora-38/
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/31594

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Updates and plans before f38 branching

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Fedora mass branching has busted f38 secondary arch.

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/38/

So you are far too late to do the mass rebuild.


On 10/02/2023 12:03, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
 a écrit :

Too late, rpmfusion is branched,

On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan
for
rpmfusion.

I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.

I can do the mass-rebuild this weekend

Right, too late

why is too late , I just notice we already got
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/38/

so is just point our rawhide to f38 and do the mass rebuild , before
mass branching


Please do concentrate on things that are valuable like doing pending
review
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=22023&product=Package%20Reviews&query_format=advanced&resolution=
---

Or updating outdated packages...

Thanks
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Updates and plans before f38 branching

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

rpmfusion mass branching was completed yesterday.


On 10/02/2023 12:03, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

why is too late , I just notice we already got
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/38/

so is just point our rawhide to f38 and do the mass rebuild , before
mass branching


Please do concentrate on things that are valuable like doing pending
review
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=22023&product=Package%20Reviews&query_format=advanced&resolution=
---

Or updating outdated packages...

Thanks
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Updates and plans before f38 branching

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Too late, rpmfusion is branched,

On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
rpmfusion.

I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.

I can do the mass-rebuild this weekend

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Updates and plans before f38 branching

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

Here's the new list of packages with broken deps.


[leigh@mpd-pc ~]$ sudo repoclosure --releasever rawhide --disablerepo=* 
--enablerepo=fedora,rpmfusion-free,rpmfusion-nonfree --check 
rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree

Fedora rawhide - x86_64 6.2 MB/s |  66 MB 00:10
RPM Fusion for Fedora rawhide - Free 1.3 MB/s | 685 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora rawhide - Nonfree 622 kB/s | 257 kB 00:00
package: kodi-pvr-iptvsimple-1:20.6.1-1.fc38.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
  unresolved deps (2):
    kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect(x86-64) >= 20
    kodi-inputstream-rtmp(x86-64) >= 20
package: mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.0.0~rc4-1.fc38.1.i686 from 
rpmfusion-free

  unresolved deps (1):
    mesa-filesystem(x86-32) >= 23.0.0~rc4
package: mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-23.0.0~rc4-1.fc38.1.x86_64 from 
rpmfusion-free

  unresolved deps (1):
    mesa-filesystem(x86-64) >= 23.0.0~rc4
package: mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-23.0.0~rc4-1.fc38.1.i686 from 
rpmfusion-free

  unresolved deps (1):
    mesa-filesystem(x86-32) >= 23.0.0~rc4
package: mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-23.0.0~rc4-1.fc38.1.x86_64 from 
rpmfusion-free

  unresolved deps (1):
    mesa-filesystem(x86-64) >= 23.0.0~rc4
package: qmmp-plugins-freeworld-2.1.1-2.fc37.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
  unresolved deps (1):
    qmmp(x86-64) = 2.1.1
package: telegram-desktop-4.5.3-1.fc38.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free
  unresolved deps (1):
    qt6-qtbase(x86-64) = 6.4.1
Error: Repoclosure ended with unresolved dependencies (8) across 7 packages.
[leigh@mpd-pc ~]$


On 09/02/2023 08:26, Alessio via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On 2/8/23 12:56, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

so if anyone can help on fixing theses ?
https://paste.centos.org/view/raw/1d60bfff


The link returns 404


A.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Updates and plans before f38 branching

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

I doubt there is enough freespace left on the harddrive for a mass 
rebuild and branching, maybe kwizart can do a cleanup first.



On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:

As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
rpmfusion.

I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.

I can do the mass-rebuild this weekend



The Main reason is, we are late and I don't have the time to deal
with
it by the end of the week(next monday I will be on PTO for two
weeks).
Most packages that we care about, are rebuilt with newer
compiler/features already. (ffmpeg and alikes)
With the new gcc major version, coming. There is often its own set of
problems. From the past, we already had to rebuild a dedicated subset
of packages because of newer compiler...

That been said, it would be better if packages that are currently
broken in rawhide to be fixed,
so if anyone can help on fixing theses ?
https://paste.centos.org/view/raw/1d60bfff

Also worth updating to newer package in rawhide before branching:
https://repology.org/projects/?search=&maintainer=&category=&inrepo=rpmfusion_fedora_rawhide¬inrepo=&repos=&families=&repos_newest=&families_newest=&outdated=on
( obs-studio is probably the most important outdated component I
would say)...


Thanks in advance
--
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: f38-free-build repo

[Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers]

You dropped the annobin fix when you rebased.

Fixed.

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/kodi.git/commit/?id=cbdf249756ff02d2a463c94f01c5e5e543281c28

Build.

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24648

On 17/01/2023 17:14, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

On 1/16/23 10:09 PM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

Can someone kick off a newRepo task for f38-free-build?

Kodi 20.0 was released today and the build is pending for Rawhide. 


Thanks, Nicholas, I have fixed the build and x86_64 is successfully 
building.


The ARM build failed with a strange linker failure. Is the ARM builder 
out of disk space?

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Default README.md for RPM Fusion git components

[Leigh Scott]

Maybe add this link to each README.md


https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/rpmfusion


On 09/01/2023 21:06, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Hi there,

This was bring to my attention recently but some
end-users/contributors seems to miss to find their way to the
bugzilla.rpmfusion.org to report issue.

Is there anyone to suggest a good README.md template that can be added
to the master branch for all our components, so such information and
others can be displayed as appropriate ?

Information that need to be added:
- Free/Nonfree Section.
- New Bugzilla entry url.
- List of existing bugs url.
- other ?

Thanks.


___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

[Leigh Scott]

I haven't got the time to waste on mesa pushes and untags.

We need to change our package replacement policy.


On 02/01/2023 17:09, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:


I suspect in this case the most viable (although
very ugly) solution is for the freeworld packager(s)
to request the rpmfusion admins untag the
22.3.2-1 and 22.3.2-2 freeworld builds (since
they should still be in candidate mode), and do
an ugly (usually strongly not recommended)
commit to revert the release number to -1
(while leaving the Conflicts in place), and
then build again (with appropriate approvals,
of course; I am not sure who would have to
approve such an ugly approach).

And this is yet another example that trying
to partially replace fedora packages with
rpmfusion is problematic.  Perhaps just
better to require that the entire mesa stack
is swap(ed).
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [pipewire-codec-aptx/f37] Bump Pipewire version

[Leigh Scott]

It's down to the maintainer to keep in sync.


On 17/12/2022 14:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:

Hi,

I saw this update on repology [1]
Question , shouldn't the update match with Fedora counter part [2] ?

[1]
https://repology.org/project/pipewire/versions

[2]
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pipewire/pipewire/


That link sucks.


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipewire


$ dnf list pipewire*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:25 ago on Sat 17 Dec 2022 14:17:59 GMT.
Installed Packages
pipewire.x86_64 0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
pipewire-alsa.x86_64    0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
pipewire-devel.x86_64   0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
pipewire-gstreamer.x86_64   0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
pipewire-libs.x86_64    0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
pipewire-pulseaudio.x86_64  0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
pipewire-utils.x86_64   0.3.63-1.fc37 @updates
Available Packages
pipewire.i686   0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-alsa.i686  0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-codec-aptx.x86_64  0.3.60-1.fc37 
rpmfusion-free-updates

pipewire-devel.i686 0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-doc.x86_64 0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-gstreamer.i686 0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit.i686 0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit.x86_64   0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-devel.i686   0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-devel.x86_64 0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-libs.i686  0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-media-session.x86_64   0.4.1-5.fc37 fedora
pipewire-module-x11.x86_64  0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-plugin-jack.x86_64 0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-plugin-libcamera.x86_64    0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire-v4l2.x86_64    0.3.63-1.fc37 updates
pipewire0.2-devel.i686  0.2.7-8.fc37 fedora
pipewire0.2-devel.x86_64    0.2.7-8.fc37 fedora
pipewire0.2-libs.i686   0.2.7-8.fc37 fedora
pipewire0.2-libs.x86_64 0.2.7-8.fc37 fedora




On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 12:34 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:

Summary of changes:

   be2c66a... Bump Pipewire version (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail
sent
___
rpmfusion-commits mailing list --
rpmfusion-comm...@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-commits-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: koji-rpmfusion build fails with [ERROR] koji: GenericError: invalid channel policy

[Leigh Scott]

Scratch builds are disabled, use mock instead.

On 15/12/2022 14:45, Martin Gansser wrote:

Hi,

I want to create a koji-rpmfusion build, this fails with the error message

[martin@fedora SPECS]$ koji-rpmfusion build --scratch rawhide-free 
../SRPMS/vdr-burn-0.3.0-30.fc37.src.rpm
Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/vdr-burn-0.3.0-30.fc37.src.rpm
[] 100% 00:00:00 509.14 KiB 931.67 KiB/sec
2022-12-15 15:40:21,243 [ERROR] koji: GenericError: invalid channel policy

  
  
___

rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: what happened to mencoder package?

[Leigh Scott]

It's a sub-package of mplayer


https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=23580


On 09/11/2022 13:57, zonexpertconsult...@outlook.com wrote:
Tracing down a dependency issue for mythtv -> mjpegtools -> mencoder 
for el9, I noticed mencoder does not show in rpmfusion pkgdb.


However, the package does exist in some rpmfusion repos, like el8 for 
example:


$ dnf search mencoder
Last metadata expiration check: 1 day, 23:38:05 ago on Mon 07 Nov 2022 
08:17:55 AM CST.
 Name Exactly Matched: mencoder 


mencoder.x86_64 : MPlayer movie encoder

Can anyone speak to the status of the mencoder package?

Thanks,
Andy

No Trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email torpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: mythtv bug reports going to previous maintainer

[Leigh Scott]

Fixed.


On 07/11/2022 14:55, zonexpertconsult...@outlook.com wrote:
The following bug report went to the previous package maintainer, 
Richard Shaw, rather than me when it was initially created:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6463

Anyone know how to fix this for future bug reports?

Thanks,
Andy


___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email torpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: ZoneMinder FTBS - librtmp linker error

[Leigh Scott]

The new ffmpeg build with rtmp disabled fixes the issue.


https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=23950


On 20/10/2022 08:14, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Le jeu. 20 oct. 2022 à 01:49,  a écrit :

ZoneMinder is failing to build, only on el9, with the following:

[100%] Linking CXX executable zm_rtsp_server
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/zoneminder-1.36.30/redhat-linux-build/src && 
/usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/zm_rtsp_server.dir/link.txt --verbose=1
/usr/bin/g++ -O2  -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall 
-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 
-mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection 
-fcf-protection -O2 -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 
CMakeFiles/zm_rtsp_server.dir/zm_rtsp_server.cpp.o -o zm_rtsp_server  libzm.a 
-lrt /usr/lib64/libz.so /usr/lib64/libjpeg.so /usr/lib64/libssl.so 
/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so /usr/lib64/libpthread.a /usr/lib64/libpcre.so 
/usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so /usr/lib64/libavformat.so /usr/lib64/libavcodec.so 
/usr/lib64/libavdevice.so /usr/lib64/libavutil.so /usr/lib64/libswscale.so 
/usr/lib64/libswresample.so -ldl ../dep/libbcrypt/libbcrypt.a 
../dep/RtspServer/libRtspServer.a
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/librtmp.so.1: undefined reference to `__gmpz_set_ui'

For some reason, the gmp package in EPEL9 isn't using -gmp at build time.
This is an issue for the librtmp packager to be fixed in epel9 as I understand.

I don't get what would workaround the issue in some cases (maybe link
ordering ?).

Hope this helps.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [chromium-freeworld] Exclude aarch64

[Leigh Scott]

Trying to build for aarch64 with a under powered builder isn't viable 
any more.


I have already tried limiting cpu cores.

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/chromium-freeworld.git/tree/chromium-freeworld.spec#n6

I'm not willing to limit it further as it's not acceptable IMO for 
builds to take longer than 14 hours +.



On 25/05/2022 20:53, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 17:11, Leigh Scott wrote:

commit 18bbf609ff961e6a9dee32384ffd083c2f9c7b64
Author: Leigh Scott 
Date:   Wed May 25 16:11:03 2022 +0100

 Exclude aarch64

  chromium-freeworld.spec | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git a/chromium-freeworld.spec b/chromium-freeworld.spec
index 7f59fbe..394ab67 100644
--- a/chromium-freeworld.spec
+++ b/chromium-freeworld.spec
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Obsoletes:  chromium-vaapi < %{version}-%{release}
  Recommends: libva-utils
  
  # This build should be only available to amd64

-ExclusiveArch:  x86_64 aarch64
+ExclusiveArch:  x86_64

I assume this is due to
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=544892 failure, but why
did it fail? I don't see any errors in the build.log. It just stops in
the middle of the build.

Regards,
Dominik

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Nice News

[Leigh Scott]

I wont be packaging it as it's too limited and requires proprietary 
firmware to function.


On 13/05/2022 10:51, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: nvidia driver is not loaded after f35 to f36 upgrade

[Leigh Scott]

Did you even bother to read common issues?


https://rpmfusion.org/CommonBugs


On 14/05/2022 10:47, Barry Scott wrote:


I had a working f35 with the rpmfusion nvidia drivers.

After upgade to f36 the nvidia-fallback.service reports that the nvidia
driver is missing and mod probes nouveau.

I tried installing xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda, no change.

I tried akmod --force but it says there is nothing to do.

modinfo reports:

$ modinfo -F version nvidia
modinfo: ERROR: Module nvidia not found.

I tried systemctl mask nvidia-fallback and then ssh in to the system
to do the modprobe manually. It also repoort module nvidia not found.

I see these files:

$ find /lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64 -name '*nvidia*'
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/kernel/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.ko.xz 


/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/kernel/drivers/platform/x86/nvidia-wmi-ec-backlight.ko.xz 

/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/kernel/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/typec_nvidia.ko.xz 


/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/extra/nvidia
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia-drm.ko.xz
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia-modeset.ko.xz
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia-peermem.ko.xz
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia-uvm.ko.xz
/lib/modules/5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko.xz

$ uname -r
5.17.6-300.fc36.x86_64

What do I need to change to make this work?

Barry



___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email torpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Your Fedora 'provenpackager' membership has been removed

[Leigh Scott]

I removed other people from the group due to inactivity or need. Fedora 
does similar.


https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/AS2YFCRE6ITN4VS6MVJ566CCSLKDYQCU/#VEXK5T5XAONVTB46VVBJVTWLCBUYAVWI

You haven't used the proven packager rights for over 2 years.

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=13086

On 10/04/2022 16:17, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:

Dear developers,

On Sunday, 10 April 2022 at 07:40, accou...@rpmfusion.org wrote:

leigh123linux  has removed you from the 
'provenpackager'
group of the Fedora Accounts System This change is effective
immediately for new operations, and should propagate into the e-mail
aliases within an hour.

As you can see, I received this message on Sunday morning. It came
with no prior discussion or warning. Now, I'm going to assume that
Leigh did this because he became angry at me for some reason and, in
anger, decided to assert his control over the RPM Fusion accounts
system. We all get angry sometimes. It's OK. What's not OK is taking
away access from a contributor that has no history of abusing that
access without any discussion whatsoever. So, Leigh, please reinstate
my provenpackager access and let's discuss why you think it's
appropriate that I should lose it publicly. I do not believe I've ever
abused my access or worked against RPM Fusion in any way. On the
contrary, I think I've always acted in the best interest of both RPM
Fusion and Fedora. If anyone thinks otherwise, please elaborate.

Best regards,
Dominik

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [loudgain] Build against ffmpeg-free from Fedora.

[Leigh Scott]

This change means your package doesn't qualify to be in rpmfusion, 
please revert.


On 03/04/2022 12:35, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Can you elaborate on this change ?

Le dim. 3 avr. 2022, 13:32, mavit  a écrit :

commit a00ffa78e89a869902e2323568790665a44283e6
Author: Peter Oliver 
Date:   Sun Apr 3 12:31:18 2022 +0100

    Build against ffmpeg-free from Fedora.

 loudgain.spec | 7 +--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/loudgain.spec b/loudgain.spec
index ce341f0..8e727ba 100644
--- a/loudgain.spec
+++ b/loudgain.spec
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Version: 0.6.8
 %forgemeta

 Name: %{repo}
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 Summary: ReplayGain 2.0 audio loudness normalizer
 License: BSD
 URL: %{forgeurl}
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Patch1: fix_ffmpeg5.patch

 BuildRequires: cmake
 BuildRequires: gcc-c++
-BuildRequires: ffmpeg-devel
+BuildRequires: ffmpeg-free-devel
 BuildRequires: libebur128-devel
 BuildRequires: taglib-devel

@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ modify the actual audio data.


 %changelog
+* Sun Apr  3 2022 Peter Oliver  - 0.6.8-6
+- Build against ffmpeg-free from Fedora.
+
 * Wed Feb 09 2022 RPM Fusion Release Engineering
 - 0.6.8-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild

___
rpmfusion-commits mailing list --
rpmfusion-comm...@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-commits-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email torpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild results

[Leigh Scott]

I have done the changes needed so kodi can build on f36+


https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/kodi.git/commit/?id=a3ea17aead50b566f627e6b58d83415b45c8cdcc


It looks like kodi is really lagging behind on ffmpeg support.


https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/commit/9796ac2795da7234e3144f3c88becc8d9ddf68a2


On 10/02/2022 13:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

On 2/10/22 5:33 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

meanwhile mass rebuild was done


You skipped kodi, which is currently built against ffmpeg-4.4. Do you 
need me to kick off a rebuild or are you still working towards it?

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [ffmpeg] Add patch for chrome

[Leigh Scott]

Hi Dominik,

Sorry, I considered it a lesser evil than bundling ffmpeg for chromium 
and qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld.


Feel free to revert it.

Regards,

Leigh


On 11/02/2022 11:16, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

Hello, Leigh.
I don't think it's a good idea to carry this patch. It was rejected by
FFmpeg upstream:

https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2021-September/285401.html

There was no further discussion about it, so you're effectively
following Chromium fork of FFmpeg here.

Regards,
Dominik

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: ffmpeg-4.x compat package

[Leigh Scott]

I stripped some bits from the compat package, smb, vmaf, vulkan and 
more, does that affect compatibility?



On 11/02/2022 09:22, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

Le mer. 9 févr. 2022 à 16:10, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers
 a écrit :

Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

There is a consensus to have a compat-ffmpeg4 package starting with
ffmpeg 4.3.x (rather than 4.4.x for compatibility reason with one or
another package preferring that version), then later go to
ffmpeg-4.4.x when possible.

Don't we have everything in RPM Fusion building against 4.4 already? Why go
backwards?

I had a second thought about this comment.

While I'm not very sure about which package required the 4.3 ffmpeg, I
understand that using 4.4 will at least ease the transition to
compat-ffmpeg4 from normal ffmpeg package because the version (and
ABI) will be same.
So packages that won't build with normal ffmpeg will not requires a
rebuild in order not to break with ffmpeg older ABI.

Maybe we need to revisit this particular point and rise compat-
directly to ffmpeg 4.4.1...

Thanks for rising this concern.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: ffmpeg-4.x compat package

[Leigh Scott]

On 09/02/2022 15:09, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote:

This should make it possible to build chrome with ffmpeg.

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/ffmpeg.git/commit/?id=afe251ab706f9a81a446ffb28dac43d8091f3a31
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild results

[Leigh Scott]

Maybe try a x86_64 scratch build first to see if kodi builds against 
ffmpeg-5.0.


On 10/02/2022 13:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

On 2/10/22 5:33 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

meanwhile mass rebuild was done


You skipped kodi, which is currently built against ffmpeg-4.4. Do you 
need me to kick off a rebuild or are you still working towards it?

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

ffmpeg-4.x compat package

[Leigh Scott]

Is anyone free for a quick review?


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6213
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F36 Free repo broken deps.

[Leigh Scott]

package: HandBrake
package: VirtualBox
package: acoustid-fingerprinter
package: alsa-plugins-freeworld
package: aqualung
package: audacious-plugins-freeworld
package: avidemux
package: bino
package: chromaprint-tools
package: chromium-freeworld
package: cinelerra-gg
package: comskip
package: deadbeef-plugins
package: deepin-movie
package: dvbcut
package: dvdstyler
package: fceux
package: ffmpegthumbs
package: freshplayerplugin
package: gr-dab
package: guvcview
package: kodi
package: kodi-pvr-argustv
package: kodi-pvr-filmon
package: kodi-pvr-hdhomerun
package: kodi-pvr-pctv
package: kodi-pvr-stalker
package: libde265
package: libopenshot
package: qtav
package: libquicktime
package: lightspark
package: lives
package: loudgain
package: mixxx
package: mlt-freeworld
package: moc
package: mpd
package: mythtv
package: obs-studio
package: olive
package: performous
package: pianobar
package: ppsspp
package: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
package: qmplay2
package: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld
package: qtox
package: retroarch-freeworld
package: simplescreenrecorder
package: telegram-desktop
package: tilem
package: tvheadend
package: vcmi
package: vdr-softhddevice-openglosd
package: vdr-vaapidevice
package: vdr-xineliboutput
package: welle-io
package: wf-recorder
package: wxsvg
package: xmms2-freeworld
package: xpra-codecs-freeworld
package: zoneminder

Full details of deps issues

https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/info/rpmfusion1.txt
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

[Leigh Scott]

You will need to disable debuginfo  (use -g0)  if your going to build 
for aarch64.



On 24/01/2022 16:50, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

test

[Leigh Scott]

test
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

broadcom-bt-firmware missing in Fedora 34 nonfree?

[Leigh Scott]

It's in the nonfree-tainted repo


https://mirror.netsite.dk/rpmfusion/nonfree/fedora/tainted/34/x86_64/b/


On 09/12/2021 10:38, Ian Malone wrote:

Hi,

I've been trying to get hold of this firmware, (currently using a SUSE
package for it), it looks from
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=555 like
broadcom-bt-firmware-12.0.1.1105-10.fc34 should be available in
rpmfusion-nonfree, but it doesn't show up for me in dnf, and doesn't
seem to appear in any of {updates,releases}x{srpms,x86_64} on
mirrors[1]. Is it not making it through somehow? I'm wondering if it
might be because it's a noarch package?

[1] For example
https://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/34/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/b/

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: etlegacy review update

[Leigh Scott]

There are many deps missing, see

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/buildsys-override/f35-free/i386/



On 22/10/2021 11:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:

we should bring this issue to Fedora , I study this some days ago

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YCOVILTRGRMLNGWEG5URL4Y2U5F4MYA5/

i.e. all i686 packages that we need, should be available on x86_64 repo
, IMO .


Workaround for the few i686 packages that we need to build is to use
the f??-free-multilibs targets instead.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: etlegacy review update

[Leigh Scott]

I don't think we should allow anymore i686  package reviews as 
maintaining the infra for them is a burden.


On 22/10/2021 07:14, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:


x86_32 builds are not done anymore by default because of the way
fedora publishes the i686 repository differently than other arches.
Workaround for the few i686 packages that we need to build is to use
the f??-free-multilibs targets instead.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Nvidia: Kelper support dropped.

[Leigh Scott]

Someone will need to package 470.xx.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Push of nvidia-390xx-kmod to updates?

[Leigh Scott]

Looks fine here.


https://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/33/x86_64/repoview/akmod-nvidia-390xx.html

https://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/34/x86_64/repoview/akmod-nvidia-390xx.html


Testing is empty.


https://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/33/x86_64/repoview/

https://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/34/x86_64/repoview/


On 05/10/2021 17:21, Henrik Nordström wrote:

Saw todays push, but kmod-nvidia-390xx f34 package is still held in
testing, and f33 package pushed to testing.

All while kernel 5.14 is now an stable update in fedora for F33 and
later.

Regards
Henrik
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Push of nvidia-390xx-kmod to updates?

[Leigh Scott]

The next push will be on Monday or Tuesday.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Orphaned: mpv

[Leigh Scott]

I have orphaned mpv as I don't have the time to maintain it.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: nvidia power management

[Leigh Scott]

See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6066
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: FFmpeg drops libavresample

[Leigh Scott]

F35 will probably ship with 4.4.x due to ffmpeg 9 month release cycle, I
expect it to release in late December or early January.


https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-linux-35-development-schedule/


On 08/07/2021 13:31, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le jeu. 8 juil. 2021 à 11:59, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>  a écrit :
>> Hi!
>> libavresample library from FFmpeg was deprecated in FFmpeg 4.0 in
>> January 2017.  It was removed in FFmpeg (4.5?) in April 2021. It looks
>> like my nagging to stop using it paid off and we're down to two
>> consumers from the original six:
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5347 .
>>
>> So, here are the two remaining ones:
>> alsa-plugins-freeworld
>> tvheadend
>>
>> Consider this the final warning. :)
> Thanks for the warning.
>
> At some point we will have a ffmpeg snapshot from 4.5, then we will
> untag theses dependencies from koji until they can build with newer
> ffmpeg without libavresample.
> Hopefully they will be fixed before f35 GA.
>
> (I would like to avoid any early retirement of  these in any cases).
>
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: aom soname bump

[Leigh Scott]

You have also done an accidental vmaf .so bump in f34 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1771177
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Handbrake audio issues

[Leigh Scott]

It's been fixed.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6006#c5

https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/testing/34/x86_64/repoview/HandBrake.html

On 05/06/2021 17:19, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I'm running into this:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/handbrake/comments/mzcegp/encavcodecaudio_avcodec_send_frame_failed/
>
>
> https://github.com/HandBrake/HandBrake/issues/3624
>
> ffmpeg-libs-4.4-2.fc34.x86_64
>
> HandBrake-1.3.3-11.fc34.x86_64
>
> Thoughts on how to fix for the rpmfusion handbrake build?
>
> Wade
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Orphaned gstreamer (0.10) packages in rawhide/F35+

[Leigh Scott]

Did you run

rfpkg retire 'Not needed'

on master branches?
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F32 is EOL at rpmfusion.

[Leigh Scott]

RIP
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Fwd: Let's retire original glib and gtk+

[Leigh Scott]

Good luck with building normalize once glib1 and gtk+ are retired.

FTR faad2 dropped xmms support a couple of years ago.

On 22/05/2021 13:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi, 
>
> I started the sentence with "if", "if glib1 and gtk+ will be removed"
>
> As news, I was going to write that everything is just depending on
> xmms, so the question is not about retire  glib1 and gtk+ but is about
> retire xmms XD
>
> normalize depends on flac and flac have a sub package with xmms
> dependencies, as faad2 had it, so after remove that xmms dep , we can
> build flac and subsequently normalize . 
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: NVIDIA 470 Series To Be The Last Supporting GTX 600/700 Series Kepler.

[Leigh Scott]

Yes they supported and include power management.


On 22/05/2021 09:54, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

NVIDIA 470 Series To Be The Last Supporting GTX 600/700 Series Kepler.

[Leigh Scott]

nvidia-470.xx will be the last release to support GTX 600/700 Series Kepler 
cards.

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NVIDIA-470-Ends-Kepler

I don't intend to do 470.xx support, someone else will need to do a review and 
maintenance of it
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: IRC channel

[Leigh Scott]

Do we even care about the freenode status? considering a lot of our content 
isn't free.
I don't give a damn if they sell my details as they only have my email address!
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: xorg-x11-xkb-utils missing

[Leigh Scott]

Did you even try reading the link you provided?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-xkb-utils/blob/rawhide/f/dead.package


On 01/03/2021 18:53, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Why 'xorg-x11-xkb-utils' is missing in rawhide-free branch?
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1962/471962/root.log
>
> In koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=843
> In Fedora Package Sources:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-xkb-utils
>
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: xorg-x11-xkb-utils missing

[Leigh Scott]

It was retired.

Use the new package names.

xkbcomp-1.4.4-2.fc34.x86_64 : XKB keymap compiler
Repo    : fedora
Matched from:
Filename    : /usr/bin/xkbcomp

setxkbmap-1.3.2-3.fc34.x86_64 : X11 keymap client
Repo    : fedora
Matched from:
Filename    : /usr/bin/setxkbmap




On 01/03/2021 18:53, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Why 'xorg-x11-xkb-utils' is missing in rawhide-free branch?
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1962/471962/root.log
>
> In koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=843
> In Fedora Package Sources:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-xkb-utils
>
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F34 Nonfree: Fail to build from source list.

[Leigh Scott]

caja-dropbox
d1x
dream
frobtads
megasync
pcsx2
pipelight
snes9x
xv
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F34 Free: Fail to build from source list.

[Leigh Scott]

avidemux
bino
cinelerra-gg
deepin-movie
deepin-voice-recorder
deepin-screen-recorder
deepin-music
fs-uae
gr-dab
gpac
gstreamer1-libav
libopenshot
mixxx
openmw
qmmp-plugins-freeworld
svt-hevc
swftools
zsnes
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

How to build dependent packages

[Leigh Scott]

You need to tag xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx into buildroot override.


Example (I have run this for you already):


koji-rpmfusion  tag-build  f34-nonfree-override
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.141-1.fc34



On 07/01/2021 21:50, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> Trying to update  Nvidia 390xx drivers but ran into an issue of
> dependent packages.
>
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=455414
>
> DEBUG util.py:634:  No matching package to install: 
> 'xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-kmodsrc >= 3:390.141'
>
>
> That package was built a little earlier in
>
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17610
>
>
> Is there anything special I need to do here?
>
>
> Regards
> Henrik
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

FTBFS List: F34 ffmpeg git rebuild

[Leigh Scott]

I expect a few packages will fail to build for the rpmfusion f34 mass-rebuild 
due to new GCC and LTO changes, please check your packages build ok in advance.


ffmpeg build issues:

- gstreamer1-libav https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5886
- megasync
- ppsspp https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5889

gcc build issues:

- bino https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5885
- openmw https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5890
- qmmp-plugins-freeworld https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5888

other issues:

- libopenshot Tests fail.


qt5 issues:

- deepin-voice-recorder
- deepin-music
- deepin-movie
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

el8 - buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current requires missing package kernel-devel-uname-r

[Leigh Scott]

Try this to build the kmod.


rpmbuild --rebuild --define='kernels $(uname -r)' 
nvidia-kmod-455.45.01-1.fc34.src.rpm


As for the conflict, we support the latest centos release not redhats
latest.


I will try and build for el8 later.


On 19/11/2020 20:48, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> This could possibly be renamed to, could we please update the nvidia driver 
> on el8, but I'm also interested in how the following problem could be solved.
>
> I've got a new el8 machine with a gtx 1050ti. As part of a troubleshooting 
> step, I decided to mock build the latest nvidia driver, using the source rpms 
> from rawhide:
> mock -r epel-8-x86_64-rpmfusion_nonfree --chain \
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-455.45.01-1.fc34.src.rpm \
> nvidia-kmod-455.45.01-1.fc34.src.rpm \
> nvidia-settings-455.45.01-1.fc34.src.rpm
>
> The xorg driver builds, but nvidia-kmod fails because the 
> buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current package cannot find 
> kernel-devel-uname-r. In fedora, kernel-devel-uname-r, appears to be a 
> subpackage of kernel, but this does not appear to be the case on el8. It 
> doesn't seem to exist.
>
> Note that the existing rpmfusion el8 455.38 nvidia driver fails to build in 
> the same way. Error message follows...
>
> Error: 
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides kernel-devel-uname-r = 4.18.0-193.el8.x86_64 needed by 
> buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current-11:30-5.el8.x86_64
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to 
> use not only best candidate packages)
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Kodi 19 and Fedora 33

[Leigh Scott]

Kodi needs to use python3 to avoid  this 
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5688


On 17/11/2020 18:25, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that Fedora 33 ships Kodi 19, which is currently in alpha.
>
> Is that normal for rpmfusion to ship a Kodi version while it's in alpha?
>
> I'm kind of in a weird spot because I want to upgrade to Kodi 19 but
> the addons I depend on haven't been ported to python3 yet (which
> developers have mentioned they'll have done by the time Kodi 19 RC1 is
> released).
>
> Given the uncertainty of the kodi release schedule, I may end up
> building kodi 18 with python2 in the meantime (looks like all the
> required python2 packages have been carried to f33).
>
> Are there any others in a similar situation to me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wade
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

libudfread not available?

[Leigh Scott]

The next rawhide compose will have fixed libbluray package.

On 31/10/2020 11:58, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I am trying to update mythtv in master/f34 but could not perform a
> test build due to the following error:
>
> Error:
>  Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
>   - nothing provides pkgconfig(libudfread) >= 1.1.0 needed by
> libbluray-devel-1.2.1-1.fc34.x86_64
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Moving fdk-aac to -free?

[Leigh Scott]

You would need to reinstall the fdk-aac-free package that you removed,
after this you will be able to remove fdk-aac.

On 02/10/2020 18:17, Tobias Girstmair wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 06:04:51PM +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> Can you post
>>
>> rpm -qa fdk\*
>
> ~ % rpm -qa fdk\*
> fdk-aac-2.0.0-3.fc31.x86_64
>
> ~ % dnf list installed|grep fdk
> fdk-aac.x86_64    2.0.0-3.fc31    @rpmfusion-nonfree
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Moving fdk-aac to -free?

[Leigh Scott]

There are to providers for fdk

1: fdk-aac-free (fedora repo)

2: fdk-aac (rpmfusion-nonfree)


# dnf repoquery --whatprovides 'libfdk-aac.so.2()(64bit)'
Last metadata expiration check: 1:08:57 ago on Fri 02 Oct 2020 16:44:28 BST.
fdk-aac-0:2.0.1-3.fc33.x86_64
fdk-aac-free-0:2.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64


# dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libfdk-aac.so.2()(64bit)'
Last metadata expiration check: 1:08:30 ago on Fri 02 Oct 2020 16:44:28 BST.
butt-0:0.1.19-2.fc33.x86_64
fdk-aac-devel-0:2.0.1-3.fc33.x86_64
fdk-aac-free-devel-0:2.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64
fdkaac-0:1.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64
firefox-0:81.0.1-1.fc33.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0:1.18.0-3.fc33.x86_64
pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-0:1.4-2.fc33.x86_64


fedora has compiled gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free with fdk support.

# rpm -e --test gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
error: Failed dependencies:
    gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free >= 1.0.0 is needed by (installed)
farstream02-0.2.9-3.fc33.x86_64
    gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free is needed by (installed)
pidgin-2.14.1-2.fc33.x86_64
    libgstcodecparsers-1.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.18.0-1.fc33.x86_64
    libgstphotography-1.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
qt5-qtmultimedia-5.15.1-1.fc33.x86_64

Can you post

rpm -qa fdk\*


On 02/10/2020 17:49, Tobias Girstmair wrote:
>
> Interestingly, trying to remove the package attempts to remove a whole
> bunch
> of further packages (direct dependencies appear to be qutebrowser,
> pulseeffects, and strangest of all pidgin and freecad. all from fedora
> repos,
> too). But I do not expect you to solve this for me ;)
>
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Moving fdk-aac to -free?

[Leigh Scott]

The fedora fdk free package isn't equal to the rpmfusion package.

They use a different source code which has the patented code removed.

On 30/09/2020 08:02, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mar. 29 sept. 2020 à 17:38, Tobias Girstmair  a 
> écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> While looking at my local packages I noticed fdk-aac installed from
>> rpmfusion-nonfree. The Review Request[1] mentions that (at the time) the
>> FSF and Debian[2] considered this license non-free. But since then, both
>> the FSF[3] and Fedora[4] have deemed the FDK-AAC license free but GPL
>> incompatible.
>
> Hi there,
> I would like to have view from others contributor on the topic, not
> only my own point of view...
>
> Also can you clarify why you need this over using the internal ffmpeg
> AAC codec ?
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: rawhide/f33: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld rebuild for qt 5.15.1 update

[Leigh Scott]

File a bug report so the maintainer sees it!
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Broken appdata] pyskool

[Leigh Scott]

pyskool.desktop doesn't exist so there isn't a icon to find



  
pyskool.desktop
pyskool
Pyskool
Remake of Skool Daze and Back to Skool
Pyskool is a faithful re-implementation of the classic ZX 
Spectrum games Skool Daze and Back to Skool.Each game revolves around 
the antics of Eric, the hero. In Skool Daze, Eric must steal his report card 
from the school safe - the combination of which must be extracted from the 
teachers' brains using flashing shields or, in the case of the history teacher, 
post-hypnotic suggestion. In Back to Skool, Eric must get his report card back 
into the school safe, this time with the extra help provided by a water pistol, 
stinkbombs, a bike, mice, a frog and a girlfriend.

  Has no Icon

GPL-3.0+ AND LicenseRef-proprietary
http://pyskool.ca/

  
http://pyskool.ca/xdg/pyskool-1.png
  
  
http://pyskool.ca/xdg/pyskool-2.png
  
  
http://pyskool.ca/xdg/pyskool-3.png
  


  

pyskool.desktop
  

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Broken appdata] retroarch, ffmpegthumbs, ppsspp and ProjectX

[Leigh Scott]

I fixed it.

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/ppsspp.git/commit/?id=f144523e5bbb6cbeb9de54511acd6c6092a722d8


There are two remaining to be fixed.




  
    com.libretro.RetroArch
    retroarch-freeworld
    RetroArch
    Frontend for emulators, game engines and media
players
    Libretro
    RetroArch is an open source and cross platform
frontend/framework for emulators, game engines, video games, media
players and other applications.While it can do many things
besides this, it is most widely known for enabling you to run classic
games on a wide range of computers and consoles through a slick
graphical interface. Settings are also unified so configuration is done
once and for all.In addition to this, you will soon be able to
run original game discs (CDs) from RetroArch. We take videogame
preservation seriously and want to ensure you can run your originally
bought content on modern day PCs.RetroArch has advanced features
like shaders, netplay, rewinding, next-frame response times, runahead,
and more!
    
  ModernToolkit
    
    
  Has no Icon
    
    GPL-3.0
    https://github.com/libretro/RetroArch/issues
    https://www.retroarch.com/index.php?page=donate
    https://www.retroarch.com/
    Libretro
    
  
    https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-tabs.png
  
  
    https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-metadata.png
  
  
    https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-playlists.png
  
  
    https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-osk.png
  
  
    https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-updater.png
  
    
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
    retroarch.desktop
  
  
    projectx.desktop
    ProjectX
    Projectx
    DVB video editing and demultiplexing tool
    In many countries digital radio and television uses
the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) standard to broadcast its data.
Project X is a tool to analyze and manipulate these DVB MPEG data
streams. It can cut and demultiplex them and it tries its best to handle
and repair many stream types and show what went wrong on
reception.
    I många länder använder digital radio
och television DVB-standarden (Digital Video Broadcasting) för att sända
sina data.  Project X är ett verktyg för att analysera och hantera dessa
DVB-MPEG-dataströmmar.  Det kan dela upp och demultiplexa dem och det
gör sitt bästa för att hantera och reparera många strömtyper och visa
vad som gick fel vid mottagningen.
    
  Has no Icon
    
    GPL-2.0+
    http://project-x.sourceforge.net/
    
  
    https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/ProjectX.git/plain/screenshot.png
  
    
    
    
  
    
    xpenguins.desktop
  


On 19/09/2020 18:04, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> It is so indeed, but `appstream-util` treats  tag as invalid:
>
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=438129&volume=DEFAULT&name=build.log&offset=-4000
>
> On 19/09/20 18:34, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> Don't quote me, but I think it gets the icon from the desktop files, the
>> icon names should match  the desktop file names.
>>
>>
>> On 19/09/2020 10:35, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
>>> I fixed the PPSSPP's appdata files where icon/ tags were missing.
>>>
>>> On 17/09/20 22:01, Leigh Scott wrote:
>>>
>>> ___
>>> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
>>> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to 
>>> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>> ___
>> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 
>> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>>
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [Broken appdata] retroarch, ffmpegthumbs, ppsspp and ProjectX

[Leigh Scott]

Don't quote me, but I think it gets the icon from the desktop files, the
icon names should match  the desktop file names.


On 19/09/2020 10:35, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> I fixed the PPSSPP's appdata files where icon/ tags were missing.
>
> On 17/09/20 22:01, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

rfpkg build

[Leigh Scott]

Maybe try reading your bug reports ;-)

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5756


On 18/09/2020 14:14, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I can't use `$ rfpkg build`
>
> $ rfpkg build
> Could not execute build: 'Commands' object has no attribute
> 'read_koji_config'
>
>
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

rfpkg build fails with "Could not execute build: 'Commands' object has no attribute 'read_koji_config'"

[Leigh Scott]

Why post here?, see

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5756


On 18/09/2020 10:39, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
> would like to create a new package from shotcut, but it fails.
>
> [martin@fc32 shotcut]$ rfpkg clog && rfpkg commit -F clog && /bin/rm clog && 
> git show
> Could not execute clog: Unable to query koji to find rawhide  
>   target
> [martin@fc32 shotcut]$ rfpkg push
> Everything up-to-date
> [martin@fc32 shotcut]$ rfpkg build --nowait
> Could not execute build: 'Commands' object has no attribute 'read_koji_config'
>
> Regards
> Martin
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Broken appdata] retroarch, ffmpegthumbs, ppsspp and ProjectX

[Leigh Scott]

I can address that issue.

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.git/commit/?id=fee9fe5f4ef0cd6707b6d665397398d2b4809686


On 17/09/2020 21:51, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 20:01 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> 
>>   org.kde.ffmpegthumbs has no parent of
>> 'org.kde.dolphin.desktop'
>> 
> what we can do ? dolphin is available on Fedora  
>
> rpm -qf /usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.dolphin.appdata.xml -i 
>
> Name: dolphin
> (...)
> Source RPM  : dolphin-19.12.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
> Build Date  : qua 15 jan 2020 15:13:16 WET
> Build Host  : buildvm-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org
> Packager: Fedora Project
> Vendor  : Fedora Project
> URL : https://cgit.kde.org/dolphin.git/
> Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/dolphin
> Summary : KDE File Manager
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[Broken appdata] retroarch, ffmpegthumbs, ppsspp and ProjectX

[Leigh Scott]

appstream-builder has veto your apps mainly due to missing icon.
This means your app isn't displayed in gnome-ssoftware.

https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data/








  
com.libretro.RetroArch
retroarch-freeworld
RetroArch
Frontend for emulators, game engines and media players
Libretro
RetroArch is an open source and cross platform 
frontend/framework for emulators, game engines, video games, media players and 
other applications.While it can do many things besides this, it is most 
widely known for enabling you to run classic games on a wide range of computers 
and consoles through a slick graphical interface. Settings are also unified so 
configuration is done once and for all.In addition to this, you will 
soon be able to run original game discs (CDs) from RetroArch. We take videogame 
preservation seriously and want to ensure you can run your originally bought 
content on modern day PCs.RetroArch has advanced features like shaders, 
netplay, rewinding, next-frame response times, runahead, and 
more!

  ModernToolkit


  Has no Icon

GPL-3.0
https://github.com/libretro/RetroArch/issues
https://www.retroarch.com/index.php?page=donate
https://www.retroarch.com/
Libretro

  
https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-tabs.png
  
  
https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-metadata.png
  
  
https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-playlists.png
  
  
https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-osk.png
  
  
https://www.retroarch.com/images/xmb-updater.png
  


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

retroarch.desktop
  



  
org.kde.ffmpegthumbs
ffmpegthumbs
FFmpeg Thumbnailer
Generador de miniatures amb FFmpeg
Generátor náhledů pro FFmpeg
FFmpeg-Vorschaugenerator
Πρόγραμμα εικόνων επισκόπησης FFmpeg
Creador de vistas previas FFmpeg
FFmpeg koadro-txiki egilea
FFmpeg-pienoiskuvien luonti
Créateur de vignettes FFmpeg
Generatore di miniature FFmpeg
FFmpeg 미리 보기 생성기
FFmpeg miniatuurmaker
Twórca miniatur FFmpeg
Miniaturas do FFmpeg
Miniaturas do FFmpeg
FFmpeg miniatyrbilder
Засіб створення мініатюр FFmpeg
FFmpeg 缩略图提供程序
FFmpeg 縮圖產生工具
Video thumbnail generator using FFmpeg
Generador de miniatures de vídeo amb FFmpeg
Erstellt Video-Vorschaubilder mit FFmpeg
Παραγωγός εικόνων επισκόπησης βίντεο με το 
FFmpeg
Generador de vistas previas de vídeo usando 
FFmpeg
Bideoen koadro-txiki sortzailea FFmpeg 
erabiliz
Luo FFmpegiä käyttäen videopienoiskuvia
Générateur de vignettes vidéo à l'aide de 
FFmpeg
Penghasil thumbnail video menggunakan 
FFmpeg
Generatore di miniature video che usa 
FFmpeg
FFmpeg를 사용하여 동영상 미리 보기 생성
Generator van videominiatuur met behulp van 
FFmpeg
Twórca miniatur filmów wykorzystujący 
FFmpeg
Gerador de miniaturas em vídeo que usa o 
FFmpeg
Gerador de miniaturas em vídeo que usa o 
FFmpeg
Generátor video miniatúr pomocou FFmpeg
Generering av videominiatyrbilder med användning av 
FFmpeg
Засіб створення мініатюр відеоданих за допомогою 
FFmpeg
使用 FFmpeg 的视频缩略图生成器
使用 FFmpeg 的影片縮圖產生工具
FFmpeg Thumbnailer is a video thumbnail generator for KDE 
file managers.El Generador de miniatures amb FFmpeg és un 
generador de miniatures de vídeo per als gestors de fitxers del KDE.FFmpeg-Vorschaugenerator erstellt Video.Vorschaubilder für 
KDE-Dateiverwaltungsprogramme.Το πρόγραμμαεικόνων 
επισκόπησης FFmpeg είναι ένας παραγωγός εικόνων επισκόπησης βίντεο για τους 
διαχειριστές αρχείων του KDE.FFmpeg Thumbnailer is a 
video thumbnail generator for KDE file managers.El creador 
de vistas previas FFmpeg es un generador para los sistemas de archivo de 
KDE.FFmpeg koadro-txiki egilea KDE 
fitxategi-kudeatzaileentzako bideoen koadro-txiki sortzaile bat da.FFmpeg-pienoiskuvien luonti luo videopienoiskuvia KDE:n 
tiedostonhallintaohjelmille.Le créateur de vignettes 
FFmpeg est un générateur de vignettes de vidéo pour les gestionnaires de 
fichiers KDE.FFmpeg Thumbnailer adalah sebuah penghasil 
thumbnail video untuk pengelolaan file KDE.Il generatore 
di miniature FFmpeg è un generatore di miniature video per i gestori di file di 
KDE.FFmpeg 미리 보기 생성기는 KDE 파일 관리자의 동영상 미리 보기 생성기입니다.FFmpeg miniatuurmaker is een generator voor een videominiatuur 
voor KDE bestandsbeheerders.Twórca miniatur FFmpeg jest 
twórcą miniatur filmów dla przeglądarek plików KDE.As 
Miniaturas do FFmpeg são um gerador de miniaturas de vídeo para os gestores de 
ficheiros do KDE.Miniaturas do FFmpeg é um gerador de 
miniaturas de vídeo para os gerenciadores de arquivos do KDE.FFmpeg Thumbnailer je generátor video miniatúr pre KDE správcov 
súborov.FFmpeg miniatyrbilder är en generator av 
videominiatyrbilder för KDE filhanterare.Засіб створення 
мініатюр FFmpeg призначення для ст

Re: F33 FTBFS list

[Leigh Scott]

The task failed due to a repo isuue, I regenerated the repo and
resubmitted the failed build.

On 02/09/2020 09:24, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you explain what happened with ProjectX?
>
> Yesterday I tried to fix the build problem for ProjectX. It worked for
> rawhide, and I started a build for F33 and left it going. I later
> thought I saw the build had failed but couldn't take care of it
> immediately. Today I look in Koji, and it seems the build succeeded,
> but was built by you.
>
> It's of course good a build has succeeded, but I'm confused. What
> happened here?
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: F33 FTBFS list

[Leigh Scott]

It should work now, I forgot to run the acls script.


On 28/08/2020 07:26, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Leigh Scott wrote on 2020/08/28 5:07:
>> Thanks for addressing the issues.
>>
>> I have sponsored you for proven packager status, feel free to build it
>> for >= f32 branches.
>
> Thank you, however currently I see:
>
> ===
> [tasaka1@localhost master]$ git push
> FATAL: W any free/dosemu mtasaka DENIED by fallthru
> (or you mis-spelled the reponame)
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
>
> Please make sure you have the correct access rights
> and the repository exists.
>
> Is this just a intermediate status and just more few hours is needed
> or something is wrong?
> ===
>
> (Just note that I am also provenpackager on Fedora side)
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: F33 FTBFS list

[Leigh Scott]

Thanks for addressing the issues.

I have sponsored you for proven packager status, feel free to build it
for >= f32 branches.


On 27/08/2020 14:18, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Leigh Scott wrote on 2020/08/20 17:56:
>>
>> dosemu should be retired, it's is broken in F32 and is unmaintained, see
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5663
>
> dosemu FTBFS for F-33 and above seems to be LTO issue.
> For dosemu being non-funtional on F-32 and above, I created
> one scratch build which is supposed to fix the issue, so
> I hope someone will visit the above ticket again.
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

[kodi] Update release tag

[Leigh Scott]

Perhaps add an epoch to address this issue.

___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F33 FTBFS list

[Leigh Scott]

vcmi is also a candidate for retirement, the maintainer is unresponsive 
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5674
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F33 FTBFS list

[Leigh Scott]

Can we retire freeguide?, the package is non-functional in F32 due to a
xmltv issue.

I doubt this package has worked for many releases.


dosemu should be retired, it's is broken in F32 and is unmaintained, see

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5663




On 19/08/2020 13:06, Leigh Scott wrote:
> free FTBFS
>
> ProjectX
> deepin-movie
> deepin-screen-recorder
> deepin-voice-recorder
> dosemu
> freeguide
> game-data-packager
> kodi-inputstream-adaptive
> kodi-peripheral-joystick
> kodi-pvr-dvblink
> kodi-pvr-demo
> kodi-pvr-dvbviewer
> kodi-pvr-iptvsimple
> kodi-pvr-mediaportal-tvserver
> kodi-pvr-hts
> kodi-pvr-mythtv
> kodi-pvr-njoy
> kodi-pvr-nextpvr
> kodi-pvr-vbox
> kodi-pvr-wmc
> kodi-pvr-vuplus
> kodi-pvr-vdr-vnsi
> kodi-visualization-spectrum
> libopenshot
> libtgvoip
> mlt-freeworld
> mythtv
> openmw
> pithos
> ppsspp
> telegram-desktop
> tvheadend
> vcmi
> vlmc
>
>
> nonfree FTBFS
>
> dream
> megasync
> pipelight
> vice
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Strange error trying to rebuild Avidemux

[Leigh Scott]

I didn't notice any of your cmake fixes yesterday.

It built ok for f33 after I fixed the cmake and LTO issues.


http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=15993


On 19/08/2020 12:52, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I think I finally have all the cmake change shenanigans fixed but now
> I'm running into this:
>
> - Checking for VAPOURSYNTH
> -- ***
> -- Checking for module 'vapoursynth-script'
> --   Found vapoursynth-script, version 48
> -- VSSCRIPT<-I/usr/include/vapoursynth;-I/usr/include/python3.9>  <
> -lvapoursynth-script;-lvapoursynth> 
> CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/GetPrerequisites.cmake:843
> (message):
>   /usr/bin/ldd failed: 1
>
>   ldd: error: you do not have read permission for
>   `/usr/lib64/libvapoursynth-script.so'
>
> Call Stack (most recent call first):
>  
> /builddir/build/BUILD/avidemux_2.7.6/fakeRoot/usr/include/avidemux/2.7/cmake/admCheckVapourSynth.cmake:7
> (GET_PREREQUISITES)
>  
> /builddir/build/BUILD/avidemux_2.7.6/fakeRoot/usr/include/avidemux/2.7/cmake/admCheckVapourSynth.cmake:32
> (GET_VAPOURSYNTH_PYTHON)
>   ADM_demuxers/VapourSynth/CMakeLists.txt:3 (checkVapourSynth)
>
> So following the error I went into the mock chroot but everything
> looks fine:
>
>  sh-5.0# ls -l /usr/lib64/libvap*
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      30 Jul 30 10:37
> /usr/lib64/libvapoursynth-script.so -> libvapoursynth-script.so.0.0.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      30 Jul 30 10:37
> /usr/lib64/libvapoursynth-script.so.0 -> libvapoursynth-script.so.0.0.0
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   28632 Jul 30 10:38
> /usr/lib64/libvapoursynth-script.so.0.0.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      24 Jul 30 10:37
> /usr/lib64/libvapoursynth.so -> libvapoursynth.so.48.0.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      24 Jul 30 10:37
> /usr/lib64/libvapoursynth.so.48 -> libvapoursynth.so.48.0.0
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1264464 Jul 30 10:38
> /usr/lib64/libvapoursynth.so.48.0.0
>
> Ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

F33 FTBFS list

[Leigh Scott]

free FTBFS

ProjectX
deepin-movie
deepin-screen-recorder
deepin-voice-recorder
dosemu
freeguide
game-data-packager
kodi-inputstream-adaptive
kodi-peripheral-joystick
kodi-pvr-dvblink
kodi-pvr-demo
kodi-pvr-dvbviewer
kodi-pvr-iptvsimple
kodi-pvr-mediaportal-tvserver
kodi-pvr-hts
kodi-pvr-mythtv
kodi-pvr-njoy
kodi-pvr-nextpvr
kodi-pvr-vbox
kodi-pvr-wmc
kodi-pvr-vuplus
kodi-pvr-vdr-vnsi
kodi-visualization-spectrum
libopenshot
libtgvoip
mlt-freeworld
mythtv
openmw
pithos
ppsspp
telegram-desktop
tvheadend
vcmi
vlmc


nonfree FTBFS

dream
megasync
pipelight
vice
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Please tests your packages in rawhide

[Leigh Scott]

That was way easier than I thought :-)

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/ffmpeg.git/tree/ffmpeg.spec#n348


On 04/08/2020 02:03, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:53 AM Leigh Scott  wrote:
>> I decided to disable LTO for x86 ffmpeg
>>
> In the past I have managed to get FFmpeg to
> compile with LTO even when embedded in
> another app, but it required some somewhat
> fragile hoop jumping, and is likely a bridge too
> far for this release cycle in many cases.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide

[Leigh Scott]

Sorry my mistake, I didn't notice you were doing in-source builds.

I wasn't unaware that the cmake install/build macros were included in
epel-rpm-macros


https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1571914


If you added

On 05/08/2020 13:47, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> Negative.
> Take a look at the contents
> of http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=424877 
>
> You can see the macros *did* in fact work just fine.
> The build instead failed because our pod2man macro didn't work
> out-of-source. This has been fixed and will be part of the next release.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
> ----
> *From:* Leigh Scott 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 7:24 AM
> *To:* rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> 
> *Subject:* Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide
>  
>
>
> On 05/08/2020 13:01, Andrew Bauer wrote:
>> For the zoneminder package, I switched to %cmake3_build and
>> $cmake3_install. For this case, cmake3 macro is needed, rather than
>> cmake, to force the use of cmake3 on el7. 
>>
>> Despite comments from other sources to the contrary, no further
>> changes were required. As of yesterday, these macros work on el7,
>> el8, f32, and f33.
>
>
> It failed on f33 and will be totally broken on f32, f31 and el8
>
>
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=424877
>
>
>
> You have to force the new macros for f32 and f31 with
>
>
> %undefine __cmake_in_source_build
>
>
> el8 cmake is too old and only uses the old macros.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> 
>> *From:* FeRD  <mailto:ferd...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 5:47 AM
>> *To:* RPM Fusion developers discussion list
>> 
>> <mailto:rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide
>>  
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:22 AM Gary Buhrmaster
>> mailto:gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:20 AM FeRD > <mailto:ferd...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> > I haven't merged my changes back beyond master yet, but the
>> impression I got was, at least once F33 is released, I could. No?
>>
>> Your interpretation is the same as mine.  
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Gary, for all of the enlightening details. It all sounds
>> almost suspiciously reasonable and sensible, so I'll be guardedly
>> optimistic while I wait for the other shoe to drop. 😉
>>
>> It's vaguely /possible/ there could be an OpenShot release before F33
>> makes it out the door, and I'll need to run new builds on F32. At
>> which point, I'll have to thread all of the expected conditional
>> logic into the spec files, so that I can merge master backwards to
>> the current release branches in the absence of that backported New
>> Design™.
>>
>> But that's, like, a soft maybe at BEST. Since I'm not
>> currently /expecting /to do any new builds for the next couple of
>> months, I figured I'd hang back until (hopefully) the backports are
>> ready, at which point I can just merge the new specfile back down the
>> line. That feels like True Laziness, and I think Larry Wall would
>> approve.
>>
>> But if Leigh or any of the other project organizers prefer to have
>> the conditionals in there now, "just in case" the updated specs might
>> be needed to build on older releases, I'm perfectly happy to set
>> things up that way for however long we're in this limbo period
>> between the two build setups. Then the legacy commands can be dropped
>> out again easily enough.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
>> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org 
>> <mailto:rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 
>> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org 
>> <mailto:rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide

[Leigh Scott]

On 05/08/2020 13:01, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> For the zoneminder package, I switched to %cmake3_build and
> $cmake3_install. For this case, cmake3 macro is needed, rather than
> cmake, to force the use of cmake3 on el7. 
>
> Despite comments from other sources to the contrary, no further
> changes were required. As of yesterday, these macros work on el7, el8,
> f32, and f33.


It failed on f33 and will be totally broken on f32, f31 and el8


http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=424877



You have to force the new macros for f32 and f31 with


%undefine __cmake_in_source_build


el8 cmake is too old and only uses the old macros.


>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
> 
> *From:* FeRD 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 5:47 AM
> *To:* RPM Fusion developers discussion list
> 
> *Subject:* Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide
>  
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:22 AM Gary Buhrmaster
> mailto:gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:20 AM FeRD  > wrote:
>
> > I haven't merged my changes back beyond master yet, but the
> impression I got was, at least once F33 is released, I could. No?
>
> Your interpretation is the same as mine.  
>
>
> Thanks, Gary, for all of the enlightening details. It all sounds
> almost suspiciously reasonable and sensible, so I'll be guardedly
> optimistic while I wait for the other shoe to drop. 😉
>
> It's vaguely /possible/ there could be an OpenShot release before F33
> makes it out the door, and I'll need to run new builds on F32. At
> which point, I'll have to thread all of the expected conditional logic
> into the spec files, so that I can merge master backwards to the
> current release branches in the absence of that backported New Design™.
>
> But that's, like, a soft maybe at BEST. Since I'm not
> currently /expecting /to do any new builds for the next couple of
> months, I figured I'd hang back until (hopefully) the backports are
> ready, at which point I can just merge the new specfile back down the
> line. That feels like True Laziness, and I think Larry Wall would approve.
>
> But if Leigh or any of the other project organizers prefer to have the
> conditionals in there now, "just in case" the updated specs might be
> needed to build on older releases, I'm perfectly happy to set things
> up that way for however long we're in this limbo period between the
> two build setups. Then the legacy commands can be dropped out again
> easily enough.
>
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide

[Leigh Scott]

None of your changes for openshot are going to work on f32, f31 or el8

You need to add this for older fedora releases to force the new marcos


%undefine __cmake_in_source_build


If you want it to build on el8 you can't use %cmake3_build or
%cmake3_install, see


https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/svt-hevc.git/commit/?id=08688262f1fa9d274a75be6eaddf57684e76b391


If you want to use the old cmake macros you can add


%global __cmake_in_source_build 1


On 04/08/2020 11:07, FeRD wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:59 AM FeRD  > wrote:
>
>
> (assuming you don't already use a builddir, if so then remove it),
>
>
> Actually, I take that back. According to the notice, if you're already
> using your own builddir you can probably just continue to do so.
> Read the link for details.
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide

[Leigh Scott]

I decided to disable LTO for x86 ffmpeg

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/ffmpeg.git/commit/?id=bfaed69e0c3b2beb9e310d505cbd07d5eb719155


On 03/08/2020 13:39, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Obviously I had to update the CMake config for Avidemux but then ran
> into this:
>
> usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6postproc.so.55.MKcWjp.ltrans0.ltrans.o:
> warning: relocation against `w04' in read-only section `.text'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6postproc.so.55.MKcWjp.ltrans0.ltrans.o:
> relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `w05' can not be
> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> gmake[3]: ***
> [/builddir/build/BUILD/avidemux_2.7.6/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/ffmpeg/source/ffbuild/library.mak:103:
> libpostproc/libADM6postproc.so.55] Error 1
> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6swscale.so.5.izT9g9.ltrans8.ltrans.o:
> warning: relocation against `mul15_hi' in read-only section `.text'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6swscale.so.5.izT9g9.ltrans7.ltrans.o:
> relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `mask24l' can not be
> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> gmake[3]: ***
> [/builddir/build/BUILD/avidemux_2.7.6/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/ffmpeg/source/ffbuild/library.mak:103:
> libswscale/libADM6swscale.so.5] Error 1
>
> I'll dig into it over the next few days, time for $DAYJOB.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: Please tests your packages in rawhide

[Leigh Scott]

All ffmpeg x86_64 builds fail with LTO, I am testing this patch for
ffmpeg-4.3

https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation/ffmpeg/blob/master/ffmpeg-2.5-fix-build-with-flto-and-inline-assembly.patch


http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=424130


On 03/08/2020 13:39, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Obviously I had to update the CMake config for Avidemux but then ran
> into this:
>
> usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6postproc.so.55.MKcWjp.ltrans0.ltrans.o:
> warning: relocation against `w04' in read-only section `.text'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6postproc.so.55.MKcWjp.ltrans0.ltrans.o:
> relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `w05' can not be
> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> gmake[3]: ***
> [/builddir/build/BUILD/avidemux_2.7.6/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/ffmpeg/source/ffbuild/library.mak:103:
> libpostproc/libADM6postproc.so.55] Error 1
> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6swscale.so.5.izT9g9.ltrans8.ltrans.o:
> warning: relocation against `mul15_hi' in read-only section `.text'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/libADM6swscale.so.5.izT9g9.ltrans7.ltrans.o:
> relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `mask24l' can not be
> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> gmake[3]: ***
> [/builddir/build/BUILD/avidemux_2.7.6/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/ffmpeg/source/ffbuild/library.mak:103:
> libswscale/libADM6swscale.so.5] Error 1
>
> I'll dig into it over the next few days, time for $DAYJOB.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org