Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
hi, > > ... > > > Maybe I should requeue a qmmp-plugins-freeworld build > > > against the old ffmpeg, > > > > I am not sure which two ffmpeg versions are in question, but > > this may be not so easy as there was the headers move and > > there is a wild sed in the spec to find the files at the > > right place ... > > Huh? What headers move are you talking about? There is no > headers move between ffmpeg-20080908 (stable branches) and > what I'm putting in rawhide. the one that happened some time ago ... 20080614 seems to be the date looking at the dependencies I really wasn't sure which "old version" is Thorsten talking about, it just rung a bell that it does not work with all the ffmpeg versions ... so this is a false alert, ok, sorry K. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
On 10.12.2008 01:39, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: "More than one source rpm" in the build results. Huh? Unless some black magic happened behind my back, It was black magic that happened behind my back. IOW: it was the builder that got reactivated accidentally (mentioned in a reply to Karel one or two days ago). New build queued, will push it once ready. Sorry for the trouble. CU knurd
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
Michael Schwendt wrote: > "More than one source rpm" in the build results. Huh? Unless some black magic happened behind my back, there's exactly one freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11 SRPM. I submitted only one devel build and it was successful. Where is the other coming from?! > The other case that can cause this error message is "no rpms". I don't think that is the case either, it built successfully and the logs say packages were created. What's also weird is that only the devel build was affected, the F-8, F-9 and F-10 ones are fine. So is there anything I should do now? Rebuild the package in devel? Kevin Kofler
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:56:19 +0100, Kevin wrote: > > (!) freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11 : INVALID build results, not > > published! > > Huh? What's wrong with that build? "More than one source rpm" in the build results. In some of the cases we've had with Extras it was non-trivial to choose the right src.rpm automatically. Hence this check and roll-back. The other case that can cause this error message is "no rpms".
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
> (!) freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11 : INVALID build results, not > published! Huh? What's wrong with that build? Kevin Kofler
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
On Tuesday, 09 December 2008 at 09:38, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 09.12.2008 09:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 > >[...] > > Karel, i had to exclude qmmp-plugins-freeworld from this push, as it was > build against a new ffmpeg that would have broken xine and some other > packages if I had pushed it. > > Dominik, what's the status here? Any progress/ETA? I was a bit busy last weekend so I couldn't get to it. I'm planning to tackle the remaining packages by the end of this week. > Maybe I should requeue a qmmp-plugins-freeworld build against the old > ffmpeg, push it, and put the new one in the needsign repo afterwards again. If it can't wait, sure, but it'll have to be rebuilt anyway for the updated FFmpeg. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
On Tuesday, 09 December 2008 at 12:10, Karel Volný wrote: > > ... > > Maybe I should requeue a qmmp-plugins-freeworld build against > > the old ffmpeg, > > I am not sure which two ffmpeg versions are in question, but this > may be not so easy as there was the headers move and there is a > wild sed in the spec to find the files at the right place ... Huh? What headers move are you talking about? There is no headers move between ffmpeg-20080908 (stable branches) and what I'm putting in rawhide. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
... > Maybe I should requeue a qmmp-plugins-freeworld build against > the old ffmpeg, I am not sure which two ffmpeg versions are in question, but this may be not so easy as there was the headers move and there is a wild sed in the spec to find the files at the right place ... (it should be assured by the ffmpeg-devel version dependency that it does not use version for which the build would fail after applying the patches) K. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-09
On 09.12.2008 09:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 [...] Karel, i had to exclude qmmp-plugins-freeworld from this push, as it was build against a new ffmpeg that would have broken xine and some other packages if I had pushed it. Dominik, what's the status here? Any progress/ETA? Maybe I should requeue a qmmp-plugins-freeworld build against the old ffmpeg, push it, and put the new one in the needsign repo afterwards again. Cu knurd
