[sage-combinat-devel] Re: on DyckWords

2012-05-17 Thread Hugh Thomas

Hi!

I think area, bounce, and dinv are standard terms.  Spelling out what 
dinv means would only confuse matters for me.  I don't remember the 
precise definition --- it is complicated.  So even spelling outtwo or three 
words would still be only be able to give an imprecise description.  That 
being the case, I think the best thing is to use the standard term.  

cheers,

Hugh

On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:45:19 AM UTC-3, Christian Stump wrote:

 Hi, 

 I am currently working on filling the wiki at www.findstat.org with 
 more data, since Chris Berg and I are going to present it at the FPSAC 
 this summer. 

 I would like to make the following changes to Dyck words: 

 1. changing a-statistic, b-statistic, d-statistic to area, bounce, 
 dinv (and leaving the old with a warning). 
 2. changing the to_partition to return the partition when cutting out 
 the path above the diagonal (currently, the transposed is returned). 

 Is that okay with everyone? 

 Christian 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sage-combinat-devel group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/XkUWwReNbD8J.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.



[sage-combinat-devel] Re: on DyckWords

2012-05-17 Thread Mike Zabrocki
Hi,
Well I think that dinv would be number_of_diagonal_inversions but I 
agree with Hugh, the statistics area(D), bounce(D) and dinv(D) are all 
fairly standard (add Haglund's book + dozens of references since) and 
certainly way more descriptive than a_statistic, b_statistic and 
d_statistic; however the advantage of those descriptors is that they 
indicate their equi-distribution over the set of Dyck paths (that is, 
\sum_D q^{x(D)} is the q-Catalan for x = a,b,d-statistic).

Just a word about bounce(D) though: it is sort of a major index of the 
touch points of the bounce path.  There are the obvious involutions on the 
touch point set (complementation and reverse) and I think I have seen the 
size_of_the_set_of_touch_points_of_the_bounce_path(D) come up in a formula 
somewhere.

-Mike

On Thursday, 17 May 2012 12:40:43 UTC-4, Hugh Thomas wrote:


 Hi!

 I think area, bounce, and dinv are standard terms.  Spelling out 
 what dinv means would only confuse matters for me.  I don't remember the 
 precise definition --- it is complicated.  So even spelling outtwo or three 
 words would still be only be able to give an imprecise description.  That 
 being the case, I think the best thing is to use the standard term.  

 cheers,

 Hugh

 On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:45:19 AM UTC-3, Christian Stump wrote:

 Hi, 

 I am currently working on filling the wiki at www.findstat.org with 
 more data, since Chris Berg and I are going to present it at the FPSAC 
 this summer. 

 I would like to make the following changes to Dyck words: 

 1. changing a-statistic, b-statistic, d-statistic to area, bounce, 
 dinv (and leaving the old with a warning). 
 2. changing the to_partition to return the partition when cutting out 
 the path above the diagonal (currently, the transposed is returned). 

 Is that okay with everyone? 

 Christian 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sage-combinat-devel group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/OOftO57Yu2cJ.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.