Re: [sage-devel] Current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in Rust into Sage

[Dima Pasechnik]

PS. I realised that pyo3 is an option too. 

On 1 June 2024 14:35:23 CEST, Dima Pasechnik  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>pyo3 seems to be for calling Python from Rust. You need the opposite, Rust 
>from Python, e.g. as described in
>
>Making a PyPI (pip) package seems to be the most obvious option.
>With the current (outdated, I think) policies it will not be possible to make 
>such a package standard part of Sage (but I am gathering support for relaxing 
>these policies - see the thread on standard pip packages - that's what would 
>be needed).
>
>HTH,
>Dima
>
>
>
>On 1 June 2024 13:46:14 CEST, Jing Guo  wrote:
>>Dear all,
>>
>>Recently we released a library for counting graph homomorphisms [0] in 
>>Sage. Due to performance and parallelism reasons, I was considering the 
>>possibility of re-writing some/all of the algorithms in Rust. I found a 
>>Rust library called `pyo3` [1] seems to be good for Python-Rust interop.
>>
>>The latest post I could found is from one year ago [2], so I was wondering 
>>what the current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in 
>>Rust into Sage? Is the recommended approach still to make it an optional 
>>package? For instance, what I have something in mind is like `addcombq` [3] 
>>-- a Rust library which is callable from Sage/Python.
>>
>>Many thanks!
>>
>>Jing
>>
>>[0]: https://github.com/guojing0/count-graph-homs
>>[1]: https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3
>>[2]: https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OpBIfmbOlPA/m/hFKTdyE4CgAJ
>>[3]: https://github.com/Torrencem/addcombq
>>
>>-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>"sage-devel" group.
>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/604dc1b9-d5ae-48bc-a181-dd9007ff3082n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/EFEB925F-11D4-4AB0-AAB7-39D458949B12%40gmail.com.

Re: [sage-devel] Current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in Rust into Sage

[Dima Pasechnik]

Hi,

pyo3 seems to be for calling Python from Rust. You need the opposite, Rust from 
Python, e.g. as described in

Making a PyPI (pip) package seems to be the most obvious option.
With the current (outdated, I think) policies it will not be possible to make 
such a package standard part of Sage (but I am gathering support for relaxing 
these policies - see the thread on standard pip packages - that's what would be 
needed).

HTH,
Dima



On 1 June 2024 13:46:14 CEST, Jing Guo  wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>Recently we released a library for counting graph homomorphisms [0] in 
>Sage. Due to performance and parallelism reasons, I was considering the 
>possibility of re-writing some/all of the algorithms in Rust. I found a 
>Rust library called `pyo3` [1] seems to be good for Python-Rust interop.
>
>The latest post I could found is from one year ago [2], so I was wondering 
>what the current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in 
>Rust into Sage? Is the recommended approach still to make it an optional 
>package? For instance, what I have something in mind is like `addcombq` [3] 
>-- a Rust library which is callable from Sage/Python.
>
>Many thanks!
>
>Jing
>
>[0]: https://github.com/guojing0/count-graph-homs
>[1]: https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3
>[2]: https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OpBIfmbOlPA/m/hFKTdyE4CgAJ
>[3]: https://github.com/Torrencem/addcombq
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"sage-devel" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>To view this discussion on the web visit 
>https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/604dc1b9-d5ae-48bc-a181-dd9007ff3082n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/DE2098C6-DECD-4A6B-8C18-C68CDD125281%40gmail.com.

[sage-devel] Current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in Rust into Sage

[Jing Guo]

Dear all,

Recently we released a library for counting graph homomorphisms [0] in 
Sage. Due to performance and parallelism reasons, I was considering the 
possibility of re-writing some/all of the algorithms in Rust. I found a 
Rust library called `pyo3` [1] seems to be good for Python-Rust interop.

The latest post I could found is from one year ago [2], so I was wondering 
what the current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in 
Rust into Sage? Is the recommended approach still to make it an optional 
package? For instance, what I have something in mind is like `addcombq` [3] 
-- a Rust library which is callable from Sage/Python.

Many thanks!

Jing

[0]: https://github.com/guojing0/count-graph-homs
[1]: https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3
[2]: https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OpBIfmbOlPA/m/hFKTdyE4CgAJ
[3]: https://github.com/Torrencem/addcombq

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/604dc1b9-d5ae-48bc-a181-dd9007ff3082n%40googlegroups.com.