Re: [sage-devel] Re: Blog post "Sphinx documentation of Cython code using ``binding=True``"
On 2017-06-10 08:24, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: the problem was, if I remember correctly, that the way sphinx for sage is set up, sage is not a single project. This has nothing to do with what I wrote about. There are essentially two main ways how Sphinx-in-Sage differs from vanilla Sphinx: 1. Sphinx-in-Sage builds the documentation in pieces and then merges it as one document. 2. Sphinx-in-Sage has lots of customization to deal with Cython code. My post was about 2, not 1. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[sage-devel] Re: Blog post "Sphinx documentation of Cython code using ``binding=True``"
Does this mean that eventually a solution to the texinfo crossreferencing problem in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21734 could be found? (essentially, the problem was, if I remember correctly, that the way sphinx for sage is set up, sage is not a single project. Instead, we have many "external" references.) Martin Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2017 22:12:15 UTC+2 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer: > > See http://opendreamkit.org/2017/06/09/CythonSphinx/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
