Re: [sage-devel] Trac keywords
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:58:05 +0200 Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > I have a page on the wiki with a proposal for standard Trac keywords. > Feel free to edit: http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracKeywords > > I'm not sure that all these keywords are useful, but some of them > certainly are. I really like your suggestion. IMHO, if trac provided a way for people to watch keywords instead of components, these could easily replace the current list of components. This suggests that roundup has such a feature: http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/2954 Perhaps we can achieve something similar with these plugins to trac: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/AnnouncerPlugin http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/WatchlistPlugin This also looks useful: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/KeywordSuggestPlugin Cheers, Burcin -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Trac keywords
On 2010-10-23 19:48, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I think to imply code failing with -O3 but but ok with -O1 is a gcc bug > is wrong. Well, I didn't really *imply* that, just said it was a *sign*. It is either badly written code or a gcc bug. > From what I understand, -O3 should not break code unless it is > badly written. Higher levels is another matter. No -O level should ever break standard-conforming code (of course, a lot of code is *not* standard-conforming). There are no "higher levels, -O3 is the maximum (at least on all the gcc versions I have used). > But I like the idea of being notified about bugs in components I've > agreed to take care of. This facility will disapear. I'm not proposing this to replace the components, it could be in addition to. Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-devel] Trac keywords
On 10/23/10 05:58 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I have a page on the wiki with a proposal for standard Trac keywords. Feel free to edit: http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracKeywords I'm not sure that all these keywords are useful, but some of them certainly are. Jeroen. I think to imply code failing with -O3 but but ok with -O1 is a gcc bug is wrong. From what I understand, -O3 should not break code unless it is badly written. Higher levels is another matter. You needed a better distinction between operating system and cpu. But I like the idea of being notified about bugs in components I've agreed to take care of. This facility will disapear. I'm not convinced this is a forward step myself. dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-devel] Trac keywords
I have a page on the wiki with a proposal for standard Trac keywords. Feel free to edit: http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracKeywords I'm not sure that all these keywords are useful, but some of them certainly are. Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
