[sage-support] Re: axes labels in plot3d
If you right click on the 3d plot after it is made you can sort of add
in the axes. I say 'sort of' because they have never actually lined up
right where they are supposed to be. They go through the middle(ish)
of the box, but the x-y plane is displaced (for me) in the positive z
direction. You can look for yourself - right click, then click on
style, and check the 'axes' box.
So it's not perfect, but for me is quite a help at keeping oriented
with what is where when I'm looking at it. Though I'm not sure if it's
good enough for you needs.
Erik
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:11 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Diamantis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed sage (Ubuntu 8.04) as I think I am going to need
it for my PhD work. I was trying to make a 3d plot of a function, in
order to better understand a model, but what confuses me is that I
cannot find how to add labels on the axes. Any ideas?
Thank you very much.
I think unfortunately nobody implemented that yet. You can work
around this by using the text3d command to explicitly place
a label, like this:
sage: var('x,y');
sage: plot3d(sin(x*y),(x,-1,1),(y,-2,2)) + text3d(X Axis,(0,-2,-1))
(When this feature is implemented, it will in fact be implemented by
just calling text3d.) I hope somebody will implement it; I doubt
it would be difficult.
- William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, jdmuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a total newcomer, and here is very simple high-school level
question for which I could not find an answer in several hours of
searching:
How can I use Sage to simplify ratios involving complex numbers?
By simplify, I mean, to put into the canonical form a+b*i.
For a very simple example: simplifying x=1/(1+i) would yield (1/2 - i/
2)
Note: this is simple to do by hand: multiply both numerator and
denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. For my example, this
leads to:
x= (1-i)/[(1+i)(1-i)]
x = (1-i)/[1^2-i^2]
x = (1-i)/[1+1]
x = (1-i)/2
x = 1/2 -i/2
I tried quite a number of things, none of which worked.
Thanks, and sorry if my question is easy (well actually, I hope it's
easy ;-)
You could get the real and imaginary parts, as follows:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: a.real() + I*a.imag()
-1*I
If you're coefficients are all rational numbers, you could
alternatively define I to be the generator for the ring QQ[sqrt(-1)],
as follows, and all such expressions will automatically
be simplified the moment you type them in:
sage: I = QQ[sqrt(-1)].gen()
sage: 1/1 + I
I + 1
sage: 1/(1 + I)
-1/2*I + 1/2
sage: (1-I)/(1 + I)
-I
Note that expressions like sqrt(2)*I will no longer work
with this new version of I. To get back the old I, you
can do
sage: reset('I')
Or through some package, e.g. sometimes sympy's simplification works well:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: import sympy
sysage: sympy.simplify(a)
-I
sage: SR(sympy.simplify(a))
-1*I
The SR() converts the expression back from a sympy expression to a
Sage expression.
Ondrej
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
Ok thanks to you both. Your answers show both Sage's flexibility and its room for improvement. The QQ[sqrt(-1)] idea is especially baffling, and completely out of reach of the target audience (high school). As a newbie with maybe half a day of Sage experience, none of the answers was either easy to guess, or discoverable in the available resources. Cheers, Jean-Denis --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:58 AM, jdmuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok thanks to you both. Your answers show both Sage's flexibility and its room for improvement. The QQ[sqrt(-1)] idea is especially baffling, and completely out of reach of the target audience (high school). As a newbie with maybe half a day of Sage experience, none of the answers was either easy to guess, or discoverable in the available resources. Indeed, I completely agree that QQ is completely baffling, for me definitely. There is some documentation here: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tut/node22.html But the best thing is to do QQ? in sage. Sage has very good docstrings. Maybe, if you are interested, it'd be awesome if you could contribute to Sage docs. Sign it to sage-devel, there are many people who would help with it. Ondrej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, jdmuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a total newcomer, and here is very simple high-school level
question for which I could not find an answer in several hours of
searching:
How can I use Sage to simplify ratios involving complex numbers?
By simplify, I mean, to put into the canonical form a+b*i.
For a very simple example: simplifying x=1/(1+i) would yield (1/2
- i/
2)
Note: this is simple to do by hand: multiply both numerator and
denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. For my example,
this
leads to:
x= (1-i)/[(1+i)(1-i)]
x = (1-i)/[1^2-i^2]
x = (1-i)/[1+1]
x = (1-i)/2
x = 1/2 -i/2
I tried quite a number of things, none of which worked.
Thanks, and sorry if my question is easy (well actually, I hope it's
easy ;-)
You could get the real and imaginary parts, as follows:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: a.real() + I*a.imag()
-1*I
If you're coefficients are all rational numbers, you could
alternatively define I to be the generator for the ring QQ[sqrt
(-1)],
as follows, and all such expressions will automatically
be simplified the moment you type them in:
sage: I = QQ[sqrt(-1)].gen()
sage: 1/1 + I
I + 1
sage: 1/(1 + I)
-1/2*I + 1/2
sage: (1-I)/(1 + I)
-I
Note that expressions like sqrt(2)*I will no longer work
with this new version of I. To get back the old I, you
can do
sage: reset('I')
Or through some package, e.g. sometimes sympy's simplification
works well:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: import sympy
sysage: sympy.simplify(a)
-I
sage: SR(sympy.simplify(a))
-1*I
The SR() converts the expression back from a sympy expression to a
Sage expression.
It's really sad that we don't have a more intuitive way to do this.
There's a maxima command (rectcoords or something like that) but it's
not obvious how to invoke it directly on the SR object.
I've actually been working on a patch for coercion that will allow
number fields to come with specified embeddings, in which case we
will let I be in QQ[sqrt(-1)] (or even perhaps ZZ[sqrt(-1)]), but
with a specified embedding into CC (and by extension SR) so that
stuff like I + sqrt(2) works as expected, but (1-I)/(1+I) simplifies
automatically (and fast).
- Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: URGENT - Problem with installing sage on suse10.1
Hi ! I tried to insatll a last version of sage : sage-3.1.2.tar with no sucess. How can I send you the insall.log file ? Ines. On 30 sep, 16:54, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de wrote: Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ wrote: Hi ! Hi Ines, please don't take discussions off list. SNIP There is a file call install.log in the Sage base directory. Can you upload it somewhere and post a link? I'll try to upload the install.log, but this will take a while (I'm not in the office until friday). Ok. There are also x86 and x86-64 binaries for OpenSuSE 10.2 I believe, so you might want to give them a try. Should Iinstall OpenSuse10.2 in place of suse 10.1 ? Thanks, Ines. It is worth a try, but it might not work. I don't know a reason why compiling Sage on OpenSuSE 10.1 should not work, but I guess we will find out. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: URGENT - Problem with installing sage on suse10.1
On Oct 3, 5:30 am, Ines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I tried to insatll a last version of sage : sage-3.1.2.tar with no sucess. How can I send you the insall.log file ? Ines. Hi Ines, please send it compressed to me off list per email. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: is it possible to show() a variable with it's name = in front of it
Or, if you don't like constantly having to repeat the variable name,
something like:
sage: def vshow(_v):
: print '%s = %s\n' % (_v,latex(globals()[_v]))
:
sage: var('q')
q
sage: a = 3*q/2
sage: vshow('a')
a = \frac{{3 q}}{2}
This is far from an ideal solution, as if you call it
from within another function, you may have to change
'globals()' to 'locals()' or get even a bit more complex
by trying locals first, then globals ...
Samuel Gaehwiler wrote:
hi,
I use sage (in notebook mode) for basic calculations on a daily basis.
I also like to print out my calculations and hand it in with my
exercise.
Since the people who correct them here at the ETH university in Z�rich
are not familiar with sage, I would like to print every result with
the variable-name in front of it.
i.e.
sage a_2 = 2/3+1
sage show(a_2)
a_2 = 5/3 (nicly formated, as if typsetted in latex)
is this somehow possible? (is there an argument for show() I've
missed, or maybe a little phyton script?)
best regards,
Samuel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, jdmuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a total newcomer, and here is very simple high-school level
question for which I could not find an answer in several hours of
searching:
How can I use Sage to simplify ratios involving complex numbers?
By simplify, I mean, to put into the canonical form a+b*i.
For a very simple example: simplifying x=1/(1+i) would yield (1/2
- i/
2)
Note: this is simple to do by hand: multiply both numerator and
denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. For my example,
this
leads to:
x= (1-i)/[(1+i)(1-i)]
x = (1-i)/[1^2-i^2]
x = (1-i)/[1+1]
x = (1-i)/2
x = 1/2 -i/2
I tried quite a number of things, none of which worked.
Thanks, and sorry if my question is easy (well actually, I hope it's
easy ;-)
You could get the real and imaginary parts, as follows:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: a.real() + I*a.imag()
-1*I
If you're coefficients are all rational numbers, you could
alternatively define I to be the generator for the ring QQ[sqrt
(-1)],
as follows, and all such expressions will automatically
be simplified the moment you type them in:
sage: I = QQ[sqrt(-1)].gen()
sage: 1/1 + I
I + 1
sage: 1/(1 + I)
-1/2*I + 1/2
sage: (1-I)/(1 + I)
-I
Note that expressions like sqrt(2)*I will no longer work
with this new version of I. To get back the old I, you
can do
sage: reset('I')
Or through some package, e.g. sometimes sympy's simplification
works well:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: import sympy
sysage: sympy.simplify(a)
-I
sage: SR(sympy.simplify(a))
-1*I
The SR() converts the expression back from a sympy expression to a
Sage expression.
It's really sad that we don't have a more intuitive way to do this.
There's a maxima command (rectcoords or something like that) but it's
not obvious how to invoke it directly on the SR object.
I've actually been working on a patch for coercion that will allow
number fields to come with specified embeddings, in which case we
will let I be in QQ[sqrt(-1)] (or even perhaps ZZ[sqrt(-1)]), but
with a specified embedding into CC (and by extension SR) so that
I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so
by extension SR means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I.
For the record, Mathematica just automatically simplify things like 1/(1+I),
as does Maple, and Sage should too since since ginsh (ginac's shell) does
simplify 1/(1+I) too (see below):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ math
Mathematica 6.0 for Linux x86 (64-bit)
Copyright 1988-2007 Wolfram Research, Inc.
In[1]:= I^2
Out[1]= -1
In[2]:= 1/(1+I)
1 I
Out[2]= - - -
2 2
---
In Maple:
1/(1+I);
1/2 - 1/2 I
In Ginac:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/ginsh
ginsh - GiNaC Interactive Shell (ginac V1.3.5)
__, ___ Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz,
(__) * | Germany. This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
._) i N a C | You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
-' For details type `warranty;'.
Type ?? for a list of help topics.
I^2;
-1
1/(1+I);
1/2-1/2*I
The upshot of all this is that Maxima (which Sage currently uses)
is causing this confusion, since it has a different convention than
all the other systems:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ maxima
Maxima 5.16.2 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
Using Lisp CLISP 2.46 (2008-07-02)
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
...
(%i2) %i^2;
(%o2) - 1
(%i3) 1/(1+%i);
1
(%o3) --
%i + 1
---William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: is it possible to show() a variable with it's name = in front of it
Hi samuel, may you write yourself a wrapper which similar to this: def ashow(**args): ... for key in args: ... print key,'=',args[key] ... c = 345.45 ashow(c=c) c = 345.45 instead of print key,'=',args[key] one could write return str(key) + '=' + str(args[key]) the following unfortunately does not work as one might expect at the very first sight: def bshow(a): ... ashow(a=a) ... bshow(c) a = 345.45 Georg --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, jdmuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a total newcomer, and here is very simple high-school level
question for which I could not find an answer in several hours of
searching:
How can I use Sage to simplify ratios involving complex numbers?
By simplify, I mean, to put into the canonical form a+b*i.
For a very simple example: simplifying x=1/(1+i) would yield (1/2
- i/
2)
Note: this is simple to do by hand: multiply both numerator and
denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. For my example,
this
leads to:
x= (1-i)/[(1+i)(1-i)]
x = (1-i)/[1^2-i^2]
x = (1-i)/[1+1]
x = (1-i)/2
x = 1/2 -i/2
I tried quite a number of things, none of which worked.
Thanks, and sorry if my question is easy (well actually, I hope
it's
easy ;-)
You could get the real and imaginary parts, as follows:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: a.real() + I*a.imag()
-1*I
If you're coefficients are all rational numbers, you could
alternatively define I to be the generator for the ring QQ[sqrt
(-1)],
as follows, and all such expressions will automatically
be simplified the moment you type them in:
sage: I = QQ[sqrt(-1)].gen()
sage: 1/1 + I
I + 1
sage: 1/(1 + I)
-1/2*I + 1/2
sage: (1-I)/(1 + I)
-I
Note that expressions like sqrt(2)*I will no longer work
with this new version of I. To get back the old I, you
can do
sage: reset('I')
Or through some package, e.g. sometimes sympy's simplification
works well:
sage: a = (1-I)/(1 + I)
sage: import sympy
sysage: sympy.simplify(a)
-I
sage: SR(sympy.simplify(a))
-1*I
The SR() converts the expression back from a sympy expression to a
Sage expression.
It's really sad that we don't have a more intuitive way to do this.
There's a maxima command (rectcoords or something like that) but it's
not obvious how to invoke it directly on the SR object.
I've actually been working on a patch for coercion that will allow
number fields to come with specified embeddings, in which case we
will let I be in QQ[sqrt(-1)] (or even perhaps ZZ[sqrt(-1)]), but
with a specified embedding into CC (and by extension SR) so that
I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so
by extension SR means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I.
I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the
embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will
actually be into the complex lazy field.
For the record, Mathematica just automatically simplify things like
1/(1+I),
as does Maple, and Sage should too since since ginsh (ginac's
shell) does
simplify 1/(1+I) too (see below):
Good, all the more reason that sage *should* (and will).
- Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:05 PM, William Stein wrote: I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so by extension SR means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I. I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will actually be into the complex lazy field. Can you write a paragraph or two about these new lazy fields you've been implementing? Yes, see the docstrings at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/ 4226 . Thanks, that was helpful. I noticed that the docstring for cdef class RealLazyField_class(LazyField) has some tex markup, but is instead of r, which will cause trouble when this gets included in the reference manual... William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:05 PM, William Stein wrote: I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so by extension SR means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I. I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will actually be into the complex lazy field. Can you write a paragraph or two about these new lazy fields you've been implementing? Yes, see the docstrings at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/ 4226 . - Robert --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: is it possible to show() a variable with it's name = in front of it
Samuel Gaehwiler wrote: hi, I use sage (in notebook mode) for basic calculations on a daily basis. I also like to print out my calculations and hand it in with my exercise. Since the people who correct them here at the ETH university in Zürich are not familiar with sage, I would like to print every result with the variable-name in front of it. i.e. sage a_2 = 2/3+1 sage show(a_2) a_2 = 5/3 (nicly formated, as if typsetted in latex) is this somehow possible? (is there an argument for show() I've missed, or maybe a little phyton script?) I guess I should add that I don't think the exact syntax you have will work. Once a_2 is passed to the show function, I don't think the show function knows where it came from, i.e., the show function has access to the *value* of a_2, but doesn't know what variable name was actually passed. The other solutions had the variable name passed to the function as a string, which, of course, would be different because there you are passing in a string, the name of the variable. Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: How to simplify complex ratios, eg 1/(1+i)
I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so by extension SR means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I. I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will actually be into the complex lazy field. Can you write a paragraph or two about these new lazy fields you've been implementing? William -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] how to auto evaluate blocks with %html (sage notebook)
Hi, it would appear that #auto is incompatible with %html. Is this working as intended, or is there another way? If I don't use %html, anything I write doesn't word-wrap (word wrapping is what I want). Elsewhere, William wrote that: If word wrapped, if you click to the left of the output, it will toggle between show, word wrap off, hide. The state for individual cells should be remembered. This is also documented on the help page. Unfortunately for me, clicking in this way only seems to toggle between hidden output or shown output, with no effects on word wrap. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] is it possible to show() a variable with it's name = in front of it
hi, I use sage (in notebook mode) for basic calculations on a daily basis. I also like to print out my calculations and hand it in with my exercise. Since the people who correct them here at the ETH university in Zürich are not familiar with sage, I would like to print every result with the variable-name in front of it. i.e. sage a_2 = 2/3+1 sage show(a_2) a_2 = 5/3 (nicly formated, as if typsetted in latex) is this somehow possible? (is there an argument for show() I've missed, or maybe a little phyton script?) best regards, Samuel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: URGENT - Problem with installing sage on suse10.1
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be to the office tomorrow; do you understand french ? You get an internal compiler error when installing the Cython spkg. You're using gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux) and the error is copied below and is, in short internal compiler error. This always indicates either a serious bug in your compiler or your hardware is defective. You should definitely upgrade to a newer version of GCC and try building Sage again from scratch. gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC -I/home/essai/Desktop/SAGEmath/sage-3.1.2/local/include/python2.5 -c /home/essai/Desktop/SAGEmath/sage-3.1.2/spkg/build/cython-0.9.8.1.1.p0/src/Cython/Plex/Scanners.c -o build/temp.linux-i686-2.5/home/essai/Desktop/SAGEmath/sage-3.1.2/spkg/build/cython-0.9.8.1.1.p0/src/Cython/Plex/Scanners.o /home/essai/Desktop/SAGEmath/sage-3.1.2/spkg/build/cython-0.9.8.1.1.p0/src/Cython/Plex/Scanners.c: In function '__pyx_pf_6Cython_4Plex_8Scanners_7Scanner_scan_a_token': /home/essai/Desktop/SAGEmath/sage-3.1.2/spkg/build/cython-0.9.8.1.1.p0/src/Cython/Plex/Scanners.c:817: internal compiler error: in merge_alias_info, at tree-ssa-copy.c:235 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://www.suse.de/feedback for instructions. error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 Thanks, Ines. Le Friday 03 October 2008 15:37:11 mabshoff, vous avez écrit : On Oct 3, 5:30 am, Ines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I tried to insatll a last version of sage : sage-3.1.2.tar with no sucess. How can I send you the insall.log file ? Ines. Hi Ines, please send it compressed to me off list per email. Cheers, Michael -- Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ Unite Algorithmes et Structures, Ecole Superieure de La Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information de Tunis, tel : (+216)70 839 440 Poste 226 fax : (+216)70 838 170 mel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] adr : 6 rue des metiers, la Charguia 2, 2036 Ariana, Tunisia. -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: URGENT - Problem with installing sage on suse10.1
On Oct 3, 3:29 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be to the office tomorrow; do you understand french ? I suggested sending the install log *off list* since most people on this list did not want to receive a large attachment they will never look at. You get an internal compiler error when installing the Cython spkg. You're using gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux) and the error is copied below and is, in short internal compiler error. This always indicates either a serious bug in your compiler or your hardware is defective. That gcc is a know bad compiler for Sage (and many other software packages) - see #3123 blacklist gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux) You should definitely upgrade to a newer version of GCC and try building Sage again from scratch. There are upgrades for OpenSuSE's 10.1 gcc rpms. They might be hard to get hold of since OpenSuSE 10.1 is no longer supported. SNIP Cheers, Michael -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
