[sage-support] Re: 3D animation
Thanks, but I forgot to say my colleague has actually looked into Jmol and his conclusion is that the language is a bit too "Chemistry oriented" for him. That's why he goes back to use Mathematica. I surely hope SAGE can tap into the power of Jmol in a not too distant future. Meanwhile we will give the Tachyon method a try. On Feb 24, 5:08 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > pong wrote: > > A colleague of mine would like to produce some 3D animation (an > > illustration involving cones and spheres). He looked into SAGE and > > said it will be difficult compare to Mathematica and so he decided to > > use the latter. > > > By reading this group, I understand one can render the images via > > tachyon then produce the animation by imagemagick. I just wonder if > > there is any update (easier way) to do this. > > Jmol (our 3d graphic viewer) has some very nice animation capabilities. > We haven't tapped those in Sage yet, though. There are lots of demos > up online. A quick Google search yields these, for example: > > http://jmol.sourceforge.net/demo/animation/ > > http://www3.interscience.wiley.com:8100/legacy/college/boyer/04716617... > > http://www.umass.edu/molvis/martz/lectures/labmolgen/mj2.htm > > http://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/courses/351/Carey5th/Ch03/ch3-06.html > > Basically, jmol has a scripting language that lets you animate things in > the image. > > It would be cool if Sage could automatically write such an animation > script from some sort of Sage plot command... > > Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: 3D animation
pong wrote: > A colleague of mine would like to produce some 3D animation (an > illustration involving cones and spheres). He looked into SAGE and > said it will be difficult compare to Mathematica and so he decided to > use the latter. > > By reading this group, I understand one can render the images via > tachyon then produce the animation by imagemagick. I just wonder if > there is any update (easier way) to do this. Jmol (our 3d graphic viewer) has some very nice animation capabilities. We haven't tapped those in Sage yet, though. There are lots of demos up online. A quick Google search yields these, for example: http://jmol.sourceforge.net/demo/animation/ http://www3.interscience.wiley.com:8100/legacy/college/boyer/0471661791/structure/jmol_intro/jmol.htm http://www.umass.edu/molvis/martz/lectures/labmolgen/mj2.htm http://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/courses/351/Carey5th/Ch03/ch3-06.html Basically, jmol has a scripting language that lets you animate things in the image. It would be cool if Sage could automatically write such an animation script from some sort of Sage plot command... Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] 3D animation
A colleague of mine would like to produce some 3D animation (an illustration involving cones and spheres). He looked into SAGE and said it will be difficult compare to Mathematica and so he decided to use the latter. By reading this group, I understand one can render the images via tachyon then produce the animation by imagemagick. I just wonder if there is any update (easier way) to do this. Also it looks like some of the older correspondence in this group is not available (can see the title) but not the content, can someone tell me why? Thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout >> wrote: >>> Ondrej Certik wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >>> schmmd wrote: I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing this in class, but the pretty_print function gives the error "It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I will try to keep going, but it could get ugly." when I use it in the notebook through vmware or the notebook on one of the public web servers. Am I doing anything wrong? How can I, for example, print a matrix with latex formatting? >>> You are doing things correctly. You just need to install some fonts. >>> See >>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon... >> Where does this error message come from? How hard would it be to >> change it to refer to >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon.27tlookrightwhendisplayinginthenotebook >> ? >> >> (I think this might be worth doing even if it requires patching >> jsMath.) > I am getting the same error, so I followed up the wiki and I installed > both jsmath-fonts and smath-fonts-sprite packages in Ubuntu, but the > error still stays... >>> >>> Install the jsmath-image-fonts spkg (i.e., *sage* package, not ubuntu >>> package), and the error should go away...I think... >> >> Ah -- I was stupid, yes, this fixes the problem! Thanks a lot! >> >>> That said, I agree that the error message is annoying, though it's >>> probably annoying for a reason... >> >> So maybe jsmath-image-fonts could be in Sage by default? >> > > It's too big---something like 80MB unzipped (lots and lots and lots of > little tiny image files; one for each character). > > The error message should be changed, and we ought to distribute the > fonts from the jsmath homepage with Sage, so that instead of an error > message, there is a nice helpful link that says something like "to get > much better fonts, click here and follow these instructions, or install > the jsmath-image-fonts spkg" +1!! We've been meaning to do that forever... William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: > On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> schmmd wrote: >>> I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing >>> this in class, but the pretty_print function gives the error "It looks >>> like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I will try to >>> keep going, but it could get ugly." when I use it in the notebook >>> through vmware or the notebook on one of the public web servers. Am I >>> doing anything wrong? How can I, for example, print a matrix with >>> latex formatting? >> You are doing things correctly. You just need to install some fonts. >> See >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon... > Where does this error message come from? How hard would it be to > change it to refer to > http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon.27tlookrightwhendisplayinginthenotebook > ? > > (I think this might be worth doing even if it requires patching > jsMath.) I am getting the same error, so I followed up the wiki and I installed both jsmath-fonts and smath-fonts-sprite packages in Ubuntu, but the error still stays... >> >> Install the jsmath-image-fonts spkg (i.e., *sage* package, not ubuntu >> package), and the error should go away...I think... > > Ah -- I was stupid, yes, this fixes the problem! Thanks a lot! > >> That said, I agree that the error message is annoying, though it's >> probably annoying for a reason... > > So maybe jsmath-image-fonts could be in Sage by default? > It's too big---something like 80MB unzipped (lots and lots and lots of little tiny image files; one for each character). The error message should be changed, and we ought to distribute the fonts from the jsmath homepage with Sage, so that instead of an error message, there is a nice helpful link that says something like "to get much better fonts, click here and follow these instructions, or install the jsmath-image-fonts spkg" Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage
..can I do PDF for print in SAGE?? 2009/2/24 Ondrej Certik > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: > > > > Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik > wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty > wrote: > On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > > schmmd wrote: > >> I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing > >> this in class, but the pretty_print function gives the error "It > looks > >> like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I will try > to > >> keep going, but it could get ugly." when I use it in the notebook > >> through vmware or the notebook on one of the public web servers. Am > I > >> doing anything wrong? How can I, for example, print a matrix with > >> latex formatting? > > You are doing things correctly. You just need to install some fonts. > > See > http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon... > Where does this error message come from? How hard would it be to > change it to refer to > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon.27tlookrightwhendisplayinginthenotebook > ? > > (I think this might be worth doing even if it requires patching > jsMath.) > >>> I am getting the same error, so I followed up the wiki and I installed > >>> both jsmath-fonts and smath-fonts-sprite packages in Ubuntu, but the > >>> error still stays... > > > > > > Install the jsmath-image-fonts spkg (i.e., *sage* package, not ubuntu > > package), and the error should go away...I think... > > Ah -- I was stupid, yes, this fixes the problem! Thanks a lot! > > > > > That said, I agree that the error message is annoying, though it's > > probably annoying for a reason... > > So maybe jsmath-image-fonts could be in Sage by default? > > Ondrej > > > > -- Leonardo Parada Licenciado en Ingenieria Acustica Ingeniero en Acustica (c) http://leonardoparada.cl --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > schmmd wrote: >> I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing >> this in class, but the pretty_print function gives the error "It looks >> like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I will try to >> keep going, but it could get ugly." when I use it in the notebook >> through vmware or the notebook on one of the public web servers. Am I >> doing anything wrong? How can I, for example, print a matrix with >> latex formatting? > You are doing things correctly. You just need to install some fonts. > See > http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon... Where does this error message come from? How hard would it be to change it to refer to http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon.27tlookrightwhendisplayinginthenotebook ? (I think this might be worth doing even if it requires patching jsMath.) >>> I am getting the same error, so I followed up the wiki and I installed >>> both jsmath-fonts and smath-fonts-sprite packages in Ubuntu, but the >>> error still stays... > > > Install the jsmath-image-fonts spkg (i.e., *sage* package, not ubuntu > package), and the error should go away...I think... Ah -- I was stupid, yes, this fixes the problem! Thanks a lot! > > That said, I agree that the error message is annoying, though it's > probably annoying for a reason... So maybe jsmath-image-fonts could be in Sage by default? Ondrej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >>> On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: schmmd wrote: > I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing > this in class, but the pretty_print function gives the error "It looks > like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I will try to > keep going, but it could get ugly." when I use it in the notebook > through vmware or the notebook on one of the public web servers. Am I > doing anything wrong? How can I, for example, print a matrix with > latex formatting? You are doing things correctly. You just need to install some fonts. See http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon... >>> Where does this error message come from? How hard would it be to >>> change it to refer to >>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon.27tlookrightwhendisplayinginthenotebook >>> ? >>> >>> (I think this might be worth doing even if it requires patching >>> jsMath.) >> I am getting the same error, so I followed up the wiki and I installed >> both jsmath-fonts and smath-fonts-sprite packages in Ubuntu, but the >> error still stays... Install the jsmath-image-fonts spkg (i.e., *sage* package, not ubuntu package), and the error should go away...I think... That said, I agree that the error message is annoying, though it's probably annoying for a reason... Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> >> On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >>> schmmd wrote: >>> > I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing >>> > this in class, but the pretty_print function gives the error "It looks >>> > like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I will try to >>> > keep going, but it could get ugly." when I use it in the notebook >>> > through vmware or the notebook on one of the public web servers. Am I >>> > doing anything wrong? How can I, for example, print a matrix with >>> > latex formatting? >>> >>> You are doing things correctly. You just need to install some fonts. >>> See http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon... >> >> Where does this error message come from? How hard would it be to >> change it to refer to >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#IgetanerrorfromjsMathorthemathsymbolsdon.27tlookrightwhendisplayinginthenotebook >> ? >> >> (I think this might be worth doing even if it requires patching >> jsMath.) > > I am getting the same error, so I followed up the wiki and I installed > both jsmath-fonts and smath-fonts-sprite packages in Ubuntu, but the > error still stays... I think this error is very annoying, as I am getting it on basically all computers where I tried it. When I get some time, I'll try to figure out how to patch jsmath not to show this message at all. Ondrej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: polynomial coercion bug?
Thanks for your clarification and help, Carl. Alex On Feb 24, 5:15 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > On Feb 23, 7:57 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 6:54 pm, Alex Raichev wrote: > > > > Carl, regarding the parenthetical remark of your first reply, are you > > > saying the coercion error for plain old monomials below is supposed to > > > happen? > > > Well, I wouldn't say "supposed to happen" because I don't think this > > is the way it should stay long-term. But yes, it's expected; that > > functionality is not yet implemented. > > I've posted a wishlist request for coercions from number fields with > embedding into QQbar. > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5355 > > Carl --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing
On Feb 24, 9:56 am, kcrisman wrote: > This is # 5359 now. > > By the way, the trac update is nice - love the "Draft" background! > > - kcrisman I posted a partial patch, but I don't know how to fix this in the notebook: the "right way" to do it is to use \hline where you want a horizontal line, but jsmath doesn't know about the \hline command. jsmath also seems to ignore the vertical lines in the array definition. Any ideas about what to do instead? John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf
> > I would personally be fine with downloading *never* including the > revision history? That would keep the interface simple. > > Would anybody not like that? -1 I could imagine a situation (e.g. for grading purposes, or recovering accidentally deleted things on a worksheet previously downloaded) when having the various revisions available to someone else would be pretty useful, actually. I'm not contradicting myself; it's just not so great having w/ revisions be the default mode. - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) >> >> >> >> mabshoff wrote: >> >> > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): >> >> > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option >> > > under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that >> > > (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when >> > > one clicks "Text", it still prints as the actual output view, which >> > > isn't the same. Presumably this option would simply save >> > > worksheet.txt to the local disk. >> >> > > That would be MUCH better for most ordinary purposes that don't need >> > > the umpteen revisions history when sharing, especially since it's a >> > > bit difficult to share from one's personal computer to the rest of >> > > the world when one's computer is offline :) >> >> > > If this seems amenable, I will open a ticket for it. >> >> > +1 - please open an enhancement ticket. >> >> It's already #4404. >> > > Thx. By the way, I will modify this ticket to add a third possible > option for discussion, to download just worksheet.txt (as opposed to > the bzipped version), since some people only use Sage via the server > and cutting and pasting a long text thing is difficult using the > current "Text" button. > I would personally be fine with downloading *never* including the revision history? That would keep the interface simple. Would anybody not like that? -- William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] ideals of points
Hi, I have the following homogeneous Singular ideal defining a finite set of points in projective space. I would like to get numerical approximations for these points. sage: S.ring() // characteristic : 0 // number of vars : 4 //block 1 : ordering dp // : namesx_3 x_2 x_1 x_0 //block 2 : ordering C sage: S.ideal() x_1^3-x_3*x_2*x_0, x_3*x_2*x_1-x_0^3, x_2^3-x_3*x_1*x_0, x_3^3-x_2*x_1*x_0, x_2^2*x_1^2-x_3^2*x_0^2, x_3^2*x_1^2-x_2^2*x_0^2, x_3^2*x_2^2-x_1^2*x_0^2 sage: type(S.ideal()) One way to go might be to map to a new ring, setting x_0 = 1, then use the nice Singular algorithm for finding the solutions: http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/3-0-4/sing_582.htm I couldn't figure out how to get the Singular "map" function to work with Sage, so I just converted equations using string commands (saved in "y" in the following code) then tried: sage: R = singular.ring(0,'(x_3,x_2,x_1)','lp') sage: J = singular.ideal(y) sage: J -x_3*x_2+x_1^3, x_3*x_2*x_1-1, -x_3*x_1+x_2^3, x_3^3-x_2*x_1, -x_3^2+x_2^2*x_1^2, x_3^2*x_1^2-x_2^2, x_3^2*x_2^2-x_1^2 sage: K = J.groebner() sage: M = K.solve(10,1) I'm not sure where to go from there. Of course, I might be taking the wrong approach altogether. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks, Dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing
This is # 5359 now. By the way, the trac update is nice - love the "Draft" background! - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf
On Feb 24, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) > > > > mabshoff wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > > > under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that > > > (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when > > > one clicks "Text", it still prints as the actual output view, which > > > isn't the same. Presumably this option would simply save > > > worksheet.txt to the local disk. > > > > That would be MUCH better for most ordinary purposes that don't need > > > the umpteen revisions history when sharing, especially since it's a > > > bit difficult to share from one's personal computer to the rest of > > > the world when one's computer is offline :) > > > > If this seems amenable, I will open a ticket for it. > > > +1 - please open an enhancement ticket. > > It's already #4404. > Thx. By the way, I will modify this ticket to add a third possible option for discussion, to download just worksheet.txt (as opposed to the bzipped version), since some people only use Sage via the server and cutting and pasting a long text thing is difficult using the current "Text" button. - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > > Hi, > > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > > under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that > > (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when > > one clicks "Text", it still prints as the actual output view, which > > isn't the same. Presumably this option would simply save > > worksheet.txt to the local disk. > > > > That would be MUCH better for most ordinary purposes that don't need > > the umpteen revisions history when sharing, especially since it's a > > bit difficult to share from one's personal computer to the rest of > > the world when one's computer is offline :) > > > > If this seems amenable, I will open a ticket for it. > > +1 - please open an enhancement ticket. It's already #4404. Cheers, Burcin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf
On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: Hi, > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that > (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when > one clicks "Text", it still prints as the actual output view, which > isn't the same. Presumably this option would simply save > worksheet.txt to the local disk. > > That would be MUCH better for most ordinary purposes that don't need > the umpteen revisions history when sharing, especially since it's a > bit difficult to share from one's personal computer to the rest of the > world when one's computer is offline :) > > If this seems amenable, I will open a ticket for it. +1 - please open an enhancement ticket. > - kcrisman Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing
On Feb 24, 9:11 am, kcrisman wrote: > Bump. Again, I'd be happy to open a ticket but first would like > confirmation that this is, in fact, a bug, and not desired > functionality. > > - kcrisman Looks like a bug to me. Please open a ticket. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf
Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when one clicks "Text", it still prints as the actual output view, which isn't the same. Presumably this option would simply save worksheet.txt to the local disk. That would be MUCH better for most ordinary purposes that don't need the umpteen revisions history when sharing, especially since it's a bit difficult to share from one's personal computer to the rest of the world when one's computer is offline :) If this seems amenable, I will open a ticket for it. - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing
Bump. Again, I'd be happy to open a ticket but first would like
confirmation that this is, in fact, a bug, and not desired
functionality.
- kcrisman
On Feb 17, 2:56 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear Support,
>
> Viewing block matrices "nicely" seems to be difficult in Sage.
>
> sage: A=matrix([[1]])
> sage: B=matrix([[2]])
> sage: C=matrix([[3]])
> sage: D=matrix([[4]])
> sage: BM=block_matrix([A,B,C,D])
> sage: BM
>
> [1|2]
> [-+-]
> [3|4]
>
> Okay, this is fine but a little clunky. Let's try something nicer:
> sage: show(BM)
> Upon which a dvi viewer opens up, unfortunately not a very nice one...
> and shows the block matrix with only a vertical dividing line, not a
> horizontal one!
>
> Okay, let's try the notebook:
> {{{id=0|
> A=matrix([[1]])
> B=matrix([[2]])
> C=matrix([[3]])
> D=matrix([[4]])
> ///
>
> }}}
>
> {{{id=1|
> BM=block_matrix([A,B,C,D]);BM
> ///
>
> [1|2]
> [-+-]
> [3|4]}}}
>
> So far so good, but when I click "Typeset" to get a LaTeXed matrix...
>
> {{{id=1|
> BM=block_matrix([A,B,C,D]);BM
> ///
>
> \left(\begin{array}{r|r}
> 1 & 2 \\
> 3 & 4
> \end{array}\right)
>
> }}}
>
> Which as you can see does NOT have any "blockiness" to it at all.
> Very pretty, but not a block matrix, at least not identifiably so.
>
> But is this a bug? I'm not sure, as there might be good reasons for
> these viewing options I am not aware of. If it is, I'll be happy to
> post a trac ticket.
>
> Thanks,
> - kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.3 released [pynac webpage]
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:09 AM, David Joyner wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:41 AM, William Stein wrote: >> > >> >> I am going to make >> >>http://pynac.sagemath.org/ >> >> the official website for pynac. Right now it is just a trivial >> 1-minute webpage I made... > > I don't seem to be able to access it at all now. > I added it to my DNS account but for some reason it hasn't been pushed out yet by godaddy.com. :-( William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.3 released [pynac webpage]
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:41 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > I am going to make > > http://pynac.sagemath.org/ > > the official website for pynac. Right now it is just a trivial > 1-minute webpage I made... I don't seem to be able to access it at all now. > > William > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
