[sage-support] Re: Code Highlighting
just use emacs with sage-mode !! On Nov 16, 12:52 pm, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote: One option I use sometimes is the It's All Text! plugin for firefox, which gives you a little edit button for each cell. That button can be customized to launch your favorite text editor. I find it useful when dealing with large blocks of code in the notebook. -M. Hampton On Nov 16, 5:17 am, calcp...@aol.com wrote: Can't you write python code in a text editor that supports highlighting then copy and paste to a cell or import the file somehow? HTH, A. Jorge Garciahttp://calcpage.tripod.com Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: Code Highlighting
Would that work for a remote sage server? I've never tried it. -Marshall On Nov 17, 4:24 am, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote: just use emacs with sage-mode !! On Nov 16, 12:52 pm, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote: One option I use sometimes is the It's All Text! plugin for firefox, which gives you a little edit button for each cell. That button can be customized to launch your favorite text editor. I find it useful when dealing with large blocks of code in the notebook. -M. Hampton On Nov 16, 5:17 am, calcp...@aol.com wrote: Can't you write python code in a text editor that supports highlighting then copy and paste to a cell or import the file somehow? HTH, A. Jorge Garciahttp://calcpage.tripod.com Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: plot3d can't handle log(0)
Hello,
As a first pass, just surround the evaluation with a try/except, as
you would in Python. Perhaps you could set the value in the except
clause to nan.
For the 2d-plot, I test if a result is a real number by theses tests :
#
# The real number without infty nor NaN=NotANumber verifies this test.
# The result is either (x,y) either False
#
def plotFuncCall (self, t) :
try :
K = [float(self.fct[0](t)), float(self.fct[1]]
if not (self.minusInftyK[0] and K[0]self.plusInfty) : return False
if not (self.minusInftyK[1] and K[1]self.plusInfty) : return False
except (ZeroDivisionError, TypeError, ValueError, OverflowError) :
return False
return K
float ('nan') float('nan') is true ! : it seems very difficult to
test if a result is nan.
But only real number, neither nan nor infty verify this test -infty x
+infty.
And at an other place I have self.minusInfty = float('-inf') and
self.plusInfty=float('inf')
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] Re: plot3d can't handle log(0)
Would all these ideas for testing deal with the triangulation issue,
Bill? Your original post seems to imply this.
- kcrisman
On Nov 17, 8:01 am, Francois Maltey fmal...@nerim.fr wrote:
Hello,
As a first pass, just surround the evaluation with a try/except, as
you would in Python. Perhaps you could set the value in the except
clause to nan.
For the 2d-plot, I test if a result is a real number by theses tests :
#
# The real number without infty nor NaN=NotANumber verifies this test.
# The result is either (x,y) either False
#
def plotFuncCall (self, t) :
try :
K = [float(self.fct[0](t)), float(self.fct[1]]
if not (self.minusInftyK[0] and K[0]self.plusInfty) : return False
if not (self.minusInftyK[1] and K[1]self.plusInfty) : return False
except (ZeroDivisionError, TypeError, ValueError, OverflowError) :
return False
return K
float ('nan') float('nan') is true ! : it seems very difficult to
test if a result is nan.
But only real number, neither nan nor infty verify this test -infty x
+infty.
And at an other place I have self.minusInfty = float('-inf') and
self.plusInfty=float('inf')
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-support] maxima-great stats
I am using the stats package in Maxima. Works great. Don't have to use eval. I developing a function for the student tTest. take a list for the data. I put some bad data in the list --example- [44,55,55/0,14*2]. Maxima takes the list in and finds the divide by 0. By the way the 14*2 works also. If I put the try-exception on the input from the html page. The server hings up. Where do I put it? My function is below def tTest(self,data1,conf,alt,mean_):#this works maxima.load(stats) dat =data1;con=conflevel=+str(conf);alt1a=alternative=+str (alt) me_=mean=+str(mean_) a1=maxima.test_mean(dat,con,alt1a,me_) a2=str(a1) str1=Student tTest return str1,a2 --- Thanx -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] [sage-edu] Re: Advice on adopting Sage in undergrad teaching?
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Francois Maltey wrote: This calculus is maple-right but is user-discourteous. M = matrix ([[a,b],[c,d]]) 0*M = 0 with maple, and all other systems answer matrix([[0,0],[0,0]]) Even if you explain that for maple syntax, it's normal to get 0*A = 0 because the right way is evalm(0*M), I repeat : everyone thinks that 0*M = matrix 0, not number 0. This 0*XYZ=0 rule isn't fine. Only(?) an object language (as python) can treat this multi-sens of zero. I'm not sure I understand this paragraph. Mathematically, 0*M is always the zero matrix and never the number 0. So it seems to me that maple screws up if it returns the number 0. In Sage: sage: var(a b c d) (a, b, c, d) sage: M = matrix([[a,b],[c,d]]) sage: 0*M [0 0] [0 0] I have an other question : how can you easily verify this theorem in sage ? M = matrix([[a,b],[c,d]])# or an nxn matrix with any parameters... P = det (M - x*matrix ONE) # Call Cayley-Hamilton therem in France eval (P with x=M) answers matrix([[0,0],[0,0]]). Here is one way, I don't know if there's an easier one: sage: var(a b c d) (a, b, c, d) sage: M = matrix([[a,b],[c,d]]) sage: I = M.parent()(1) sage: P = lambda x: det(M - x*I) sage: P(M) 0 The two first methods I don't find in sage was : 1/ Sum as sum(q^k, k=0..N)=(1-q^(n+1))/(1-q) and sum(x^k/k!, k=0..+oo)=e^x This is in the works presently, wrapping Maxima's symbolic summation. It's ticket 3587, and might make it into sage-4.3: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3587 2/ kernel over matrix is right, but I don't find the maple intbasis and sumbasis which build a basis for F cap G and F+G where the F and G subspaces are described by a list of vectors. You have to work with the objects in Sage (which in my opinion is good because students are forced to think about subspaces rather than lists of vectors): sage: V = VectorSpace(QQ, 5) sage: F = V.subspace([(0,1,2,3,4), (1,2,3,4,6), (0,1,0,1,0)]) sage: G = V.subspace([(1, 1, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 2, 2), (5, 4, 3, 2, 1)]) sage: I = F.intersection(G) sage: I.basis() [ (1, 0, -1, -2, -2), (0, 1, 1, 2, 2) ] sage: S = F + G sage: S.basis() [ (1, 0, 0, -1, 0), (0, 1, 0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1, 1, 0), (0, 0, 0, 0, 1) ] Best, Alex -- Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne -- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/ -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Matrix methods
Dear support, sage: M = matrix(RDF,[[1.,2.],[3.,4.]]) sage: M.LU() ([0.0 1.0] [1.0 0.0], [ 1.00.0] [0.1.0], [ 3.04.0] [ 0.0 0.6667]) sage: N = matrix([[1.,2.],[3.,4.]]) # N.L[tab] does nothing sage: O = matrix([[1,2],[3,4]]) # O.L[tab] only gives lattice stuff Is there a mathematical reason LU decomposition isn't available for these, or was it simply never implemented? It seems it is only available for sage.matrix.matrix_real_double_dense.Matrix_real_double_dense, not for sage.matrix.matrix_generic_dense.Matrix_generic_dense (floats, RR). And would it be mathematically correct to place that code in place if all entries could be RDFed, or not? Any equivalent for symbolic matrices (even if slow)? (On a related note, sage: O = matrix([[1,2],[3,4]]) sage: O.echelon_form() [1 0] [0 2] so apparently we have yet to implement the (agreed on sage-devel?) decision that echelon_form should be over the most sensible quotient field...) - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Matrix methods
kcrisman wrote: Dear support, sage: M = matrix(RDF,[[1.,2.],[3.,4.]]) sage: M.LU() ([0.0 1.0] [1.0 0.0], [ 1.00.0] [0.1.0], [ 3.04.0] [ 0.0 0.6667]) sage: N = matrix([[1.,2.],[3.,4.]]) # N.L[tab] does nothing sage: O = matrix([[1,2],[3,4]]) # O.L[tab] only gives lattice stuff Is there a mathematical reason LU decomposition isn't available for these, or was it simply never implemented? It seems it is only available for sage.matrix.matrix_real_double_dense.Matrix_real_double_dense, not for sage.matrix.matrix_generic_dense.Matrix_generic_dense (floats, RR). RDF LU calls scipy. Here is a trac ticket with a patch for a generic LU decomposition: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3048 And would it be mathematically correct to place that code in place if all entries could be RDFed, or not? Any equivalent for symbolic matrices (even if slow)? (On a related note, sage: O = matrix([[1,2],[3,4]]) sage: O.echelon_form() [1 0] [0 2] so apparently we have yet to implement the (agreed on sage-devel?) decision that echelon_form should be over the most sensible quotient field...) Not yet. I have a partial patch waiting for me to get back to it. Jason -- Jason Grout -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Advice on adopting Sage in undergrad teaching?
Hi Alex! On 17 Nov., 22:12, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: ... I'm not sure I understand this paragraph. Mathematically, 0*M is always the zero matrix and never the number 0. So it seems to me that maple screws up if it returns the number 0. I don't know whether maple returns the number 0. But even in Sage, although 0*M is a matrix and not a number, this matrix is equal to the number 0: sage: M = Matrix([[1,2],[3,4]]) sage: 0*M==0 True sage: type(0*M) type 'sage.matrix.matrix_integer_dense.Matrix_integer_dense' Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: Advice on adopting Sage in undergrad teaching?
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:52:58PM -0800, Simon King wrote: Hi Alex! On 17 Nov., 22:12, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: ... I'm not sure I understand this paragraph. Mathematically, 0*M is always the zero matrix and never the number 0. So it seems to me that maple screws up if it returns the number 0. I don't know whether maple returns the number 0. But even in Sage, although 0*M is a matrix and not a number, this matrix is equal to the number 0: sage: M = Matrix([[1,2],[3,4]]) sage: 0*M==0 True sage: type(0*M) type 'sage.matrix.matrix_integer_dense.Matrix_integer_dense' This is most likely because __cmp__ first coerces the right hand side (0) into the matrix space that the left hand side (0*M) lives in. I think that's fine, though? Alex -- Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne -- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/ -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
On Nov 17, 10:10 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: student tTest Hi, do you know that there is R inside Sage? An example right from sagenb.org: import rpy2.robjects as robjects data = robjects.IntVector([44,55,56,14*2]) ttest = robjects.r['t.test'] print ttest(data) gives: One Sample t-test data: c(44L, 55L, 56L, 28L) t = 7.0263, df = 3, p-value = 0.005922 alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: 25.02843 66.47157 sample estimates: mean of x 45.75 -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
Hi Harald, No I don't have R. I did convert the list(str) to a real list and did a trap on that and it did work. How do I get R into Sage? Thanx On Nov 17, 2:58 pm, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 17, 10:10 pm, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: student tTest Hi, do you know that there is R inside Sage? An example right from sagenb.org: import rpy2.robjects as robjects data = robjects.IntVector([44,55,56,14*2]) ttest = robjects.r['t.test'] print ttest(data) gives: One Sample t-test data: c(44L, 55L, 56L, 28L) t = 7.0263, df = 3, p-value = 0.005922 alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: 25.02843 66.47157 sample estimates: mean of x 45.75 -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
Mikie wrote: Hi Harald, No I don't have R. I did convert the list(str) to a real list and did a trap on that and it did work. How do I get R into Sage? R comes with every Sage install, by default. You don't have to do anything. -Jason -- Jason Grout -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] Re: maxima-great stats
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Harald, No I don't have R. I did convert the list(str) to a real list and did a trap on that and it did work. How do I get R into Sage? Every copy of Sage comes with R. William -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] Re: Server Wars!
Yes, but I personally would drop the ftp and only use ssh/sftp and Sage. In any case, those services operate through different ports so you can use the same physical server for all 3. OK, but how do I emulate anonymous ftp with sftp? HTH, A. Jorge Garcia http://calcpage.tripod.com Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College -Original Message- From: David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com To: sage-support@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 11:03 am Subject: [sage-support] Re: Server Wars! On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, calcp...@aol.com wrote: BTW, I currently have 3 Linux servers at school. One is an ftp server to share files with my students. Another is an sftp server where my students can login to save their work. And another is down right now and was an apache server. I should be getting that last one repaired soon and am thinking of making it a SAGE server. My question is, can I combine all 3 services (ftp, sftp, SAGE) on one physical server? That way I will only need 2 servers (one more as a mirror, backup, failsafe) Yes, but I personally would drop the ftp and only use ssh/sftp and Sage. In any case, those services operate through different ports so you can use the same physical server for all 3. HTH, A. Jorge Garcia http://calcpage.tripod.com Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] Re: Server Wars!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote: Yes, but I personally would drop the ftp and only use ssh/sftp and Sage. In any case, those services operate through different ports so you can use the same physical server for all 3. OK, but how do I emulate anonymous ftp with sftp? I don't know. Maybe you can create some kind of web interface? If it is only to submit Sage assignments then you can just use the Sage server. HTH, A. Jorge Garcia http://calcpage.tripod.com Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College -Original Message- From: David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com To: sage-support@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 11:03 am Subject: [sage-support] Re: Server Wars! On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, calcp...@aol.com wrote: BTW, I currently have 3 Linux servers at school. One is an ftp server to share files with my students. Another is an sftp server where my students can login to save their work. And another is down right now and was an apache server. I should be getting that last one repaired soon and am thinking of making it a SAGE server. My question is, can I combine all 3 services (ftp, sftp, SAGE) on one physical server? That way I will only need 2 servers (one more as a mirror, backup, failsafe) Yes, but I personally would drop the ftp and only use ssh/sftp and Sage. In any case, those services operate through different ports so you can use the same physical server for all 3. HTH, A. Jorge Garcia http://calcpage.tripod.com Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] Re: plot3d can't handle log(0)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:08 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Would all these ideas for testing deal with the triangulation issue, Bill? Your original post seems to imply this. - kcrisman I thought that, during triangulation, we could test for NaN values and delete those faces. However, I see now that ParametricSurface.triangulate assumes a regular indexing scheme for the _faces array, so the array must be full. This means that deleting faces must be performed after the mesh has been triangulated, unless we want to change the algorithm significantly. Jason Grout and I actually dealt with these same issues when working on #5514, exclusions for parametric 3D plots, which unfortunately is not entirely finished. Perhaps a better way to get plot3d to handle functions with undefined values would be to finish work on #5514, and then after we encounter undefined values apply a region function (this is the feature that #5514 implements) that serves to exclude those values. I should have recognized this at the beginning! Does that sound like a good course of action? I can definitely revisit #5514. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
[sage-support] Re: plot3d can't handle log(0)
William Cauchois wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:08 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com mailto:kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Would all these ideas for testing deal with the triangulation issue, Bill? Your original post seems to imply this. - kcrisman I thought that, during triangulation, we could test for NaN values and delete those faces. However, I see now that ParametricSurface.triangulate assumes a regular indexing scheme for the _faces array, so the array must be full. This means that deleting faces must be performed after the mesh has been triangulated, unless we want to change the algorithm significantly. Jason Grout and I actually dealt with these same issues when working on #5514, exclusions for parametric 3D plots, which unfortunately is not entirely finished. Perhaps a better way to get plot3d to handle functions with undefined values would be to finish work on #5514, and then after we encounter undefined values apply a region function (this is the feature that #5514 implements) that serves to exclude those values. I should have recognized this at the beginning! Does that sound like a good course of action? I can definitely revisit #5514. That sounds reasonable. I'd rather have #5514 in anyway, if there had to be a choice, since you could then just manually specify an exclusion region. Jason -- Jason Grout -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] Re: Server Wars!
Well, I use the ftp site to share files with my students (pdfs, mp4s, assorted apps, etc). So, I think I need a dedicated ftp server after all HTH, A. Jorge Garcia _http://calcpage.tripod.com_ (http://calcpage.tripod.com/) Teacher Professor Applied Mathematics, Physics Computer Science Baldwin Senior High School Nassau Community College In a message dated 11/17/2009 8:14:46 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wdjoy...@gmail.com writes: I don't know. Maybe you can create some kind of web interface? If it is only to submit Sage assignments then you can just use the Sage server. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] binary for ubuntu 8.04
Hi Ajay, On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Ajay Rawat ajay.rawa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is the binary for sage 4.2.1 is available for ubuntu 8.04 (64 bit). There are binaries for Ubuntu 9.10, both 32- and 64-bit. There are no binaries for Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit. If you want a binary for that platform, you could download the source tarball of Sage 4.2.1 and compile the source on that platform. How it is different from compiling the source package? Each source tarball is shipped with the source of the standard packages that make up Sage. In particular, the Sage standard library is one of many standard packages. A binary of Sage doesn't ship with the source of most standard packages. This is to save space, otherwise you would get a binary that is bigger in terms of megabytes than currently is the case. However, note that each binary also contains the source of the Sage standard library. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] binary for ubuntu 8.04
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ajay, On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Ajay Rawat ajay.rawa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is the binary for sage 4.2.1 is available for ubuntu 8.04 (64 bit). There are binaries for Ubuntu 9.10, both 32- and 64-bit. There are no binaries for Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit. If you want a binary for that platform, you could download the source tarball of Sage 4.2.1 and compile the source on that platform. The binary I build on sage.math.washington.edu (for that machine) may work for you, since that machineis a 32-bit Ubuntu 8.04 box: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/binaries/sage-4.2.1-linux-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz Give it a shot. William How it is different from compiling the source package? Each source tarball is shipped with the source of the standard packages that make up Sage. In particular, the Sage standard library is one of many standard packages. A binary of Sage doesn't ship with the source of most standard packages. This is to save space, otherwise you would get a binary that is bigger in terms of megabytes than currently is the case. However, note that each binary also contains the source of the Sage standard library. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] binary for ubuntu 8.04
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:55 PM, William Stein wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ajay, On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Ajay Rawat ajay.rawa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is the binary for sage 4.2.1 is available for ubuntu 8.04 (64 bit). There are binaries for Ubuntu 9.10, both 32- and 64-bit. There are no binaries for Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit. If you want a binary for that platform, you could download the source tarball of Sage 4.2.1 and compile the source on that platform. The binary I build on sage.math.washington.edu (for that machine) may work for you, since that machineis a 32-bit Ubuntu 8.04 box: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/binaries/sage-4.2.1-linux-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz Give it a shot. I think you meant to say it's a *64*-bit Ubuntu 8.04 box. If for some reason that doesn't work, building from source is really easy--just unpack the .tar, type make, and wait 3-4 hours. How it is different from compiling the source package? Each source tarball is shipped with the source of the standard packages that make up Sage. In particular, the Sage standard library is one of many standard packages. A binary of Sage doesn't ship with the source of most standard packages. This is to save space, otherwise you would get a binary that is bigger in terms of megabytes than currently is the case. However, note that each binary also contains the source of the Sage standard library. In short, the only difference is that the binary doesn't come with (all) the source to save space (and, of course, you don't have to wait for it to build). - Robert -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] binary for ubuntu 8.04
Thanks for the prompt response I'm planning to compile from source. Any problem arises i'll inform you. I all ready had python installed does sage installation will clash with my python environment variable. thanking you On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:55 PM, William Stein wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ajay, On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Ajay Rawat ajay.rawa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is the binary for sage 4.2.1 is available for ubuntu 8.04 (64 bit). There are binaries for Ubuntu 9.10, both 32- and 64-bit. There are no binaries for Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit. If you want a binary for that platform, you could download the source tarball of Sage 4.2.1 and compile the source on that platform. The binary I build on sage.math.washington.edu (for that machine) may work for you, since that machineis a 32-bit Ubuntu 8.04 box: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/binaries/sage-4.2.1-linux-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz Give it a shot. I think you meant to say it's a *64*-bit Ubuntu 8.04 box. If for some reason that doesn't work, building from source is really easy--just unpack the .tar, type make, and wait 3-4 hours. How it is different from compiling the source package? Each source tarball is shipped with the source of the standard packages that make up Sage. In particular, the Sage standard library is one of many standard packages. A binary of Sage doesn't ship with the source of most standard packages. This is to save space, otherwise you would get a binary that is bigger in terms of megabytes than currently is the case. However, note that each binary also contains the source of the Sage standard library. In short, the only difference is that the binary doesn't come with (all) the source to save space (and, of course, you don't have to wait for it to build). - Robert -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- Ajay Rawat Kalpakkam, IGCAR - Save Himalayas - -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Re: [sage-support] binary for ubuntu 8.04
On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Ajay Rawat wrote: Thanks for the prompt response I'm planning to compile from source. Any problem arises i'll inform you. I all ready had python installed does sage installation will clash with my python environment variable. thanking you No, Sage installs its own Python which will not interfere with your system Python. - Robert -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
