[SA-list] Beta site
Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dirk, Is the beta site not running ? Mike - [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
RE: [SA-list] Service vs. Application
Mmm I do not agree Only works on 2003 by me ? Mike -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Walker, Chuck Verzonden: vrijdag 21 mei 2004 19:45 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Service vs. Application I have tried this on Windows NT4 Terminal server and Windows 2000 Terminal serve and Server 2003. All works. Chuck Walker We do not stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell, Jim Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Service vs. Application I believe this would work if: 1. You are running 2003 Server. (Which you are.) 2. You have the latest version of Terminal Services client. Haven't tried it because we are running 2000 Server. Jim F. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ewing Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Service vs. Application If you run SA as a service and would like to maintain via Terminal Services, you can run RDP from the command line and enter using the console. Mstsc /v:servername /console. This will allow SA to show up on the task bar, and allow editing without stopping the service. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell, Jim Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Service vs. Application This is a constant problem at our site. (I have too many helpers.) I prefer to run SA as a service. If you do so, make sure to setup an ID and password and enter them on the checks that need authentication. The service runs with the system account and desktop interaction. If you desire to perform maintenance remotely using Terminal Services, then you must stop the SA service, and then launch the application. Make your changes, and don't forget to save before you exit. After exiting, restart the SA service. One draw back to this approach is you lose history. All items that are down will Alert and you will no longer have your running since information. If you want to run as a service and use the desktop interaction feature, then you need to use a product like PCAnywhere instead of terminal services. If it is a COMPAQ server you can use the RILO card interface. Jim Ferrell EDS - Allison Transmission 4700 W 10th St Mail Code 462-470-M-12A Indianapolis, IN 46222 * phone: +01-317-242-0034 (8-252) * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell phone: 317-716-4541 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael J. Dunigan Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Service vs. Application I have SA v4.1.1591 installed on a Windows 2003 server. I am a little fuzzy about the difference between running as an application and as a service. I have seen this talked about on this maillist, but I am not understanding the difference. I do know that I made a small change to a check from a Terminal Services session, and the next time I was at the SA console, the change had not been made there. I can't find anything in the Administration Guide about the differences. Thanks, Mike === Michael J. Dunigan U of MichiganPhone:(734)647-3633 MDunigan @ umich.edu Office of the Registrar Member of the Academic Affairs Network Administrators Team === Mailed with Pegasus v4.12a --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
RE: [SA-list] Still having alert problems
Via which SMTP server are you sending (not exchange i hope, because that was down..) Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 27 april 2004 18:11 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [***SPAM***] RE: [SA-list] Still having alert problems Jason, Do you ever get email alerts? Within each alert, you have to configure it to send you a message, have you verified that's it configured under the ones that you tested? Jesse. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Posted At: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:59 AM Posted To: Servers Alive mailing list Conversation: [SA-list] Still having alert problems Subject: [SA-list] Still having alert problems Hi, This is my second posting for the same problem (no response to the first one). This time I had scheduled downtime on our mail server, but left SA running to see what would happen. Again I didn't get any messages and the debug log doesn't show any attempt to send a email message to me. I have included my initial message below the following log messages. Any help would be greatly appreciated. JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 JSRVR - Webmail,21,1,5,20040423,2304,20040423,0825,879 From Debug log: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:04:52 PM URL check (https://webmail) failed due to 503 Service Unavailable(line 0) Friday, April 23, 2004 11:04:52 PM URL check took 155 ms JSRVR - Exchange Store,22,1,5,20040424,0018,20040423,0825,953 JSRVR - Exchange Store,22,1,5,20040424,0018,20040423,0825,953 JSRVR - Exchange Store,22,1,5,20040424,0018,20040423,0825,953 JSRVR - Exchange Store,22,1,5,20040424,0018,20040423,0825,953 From Debug log: Saturday, April 24, 2004 12:18:21 AM GetServiceStatus MSExchangeIS: Stopped Saturday, April 24, 2004 12:18:21 AM NTService check of MSExchangeIS on jsrvr failed Initial Message to Mailing List Hi, I have just recently purchased Servers Alive and seem to be having inconsistent alerts. The following examples show that a disk exceeded its limit, yet I never received a email message. The SA systray icon went red, but as you will see in the log there was no mention of SA trying to send email. Build 4.1.1591 Enterprise Edition Normal run with limit set to 500MB - Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:18:03 AM INF: Diskspace check for NT/Win2K Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:18:03 AM Disk space checking on \\server\d$: 468.05859375 Mbytes free The line was red and I had a stop sign in the systray, but I didn't get emailed. I changed the limit to 700MB and forced a check manually and was alerted. Forced check with limit set at 700MB - Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:57:54 AM INF: Diskspace check for NT/Win2K Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:57:54 AM Disk space checking on \\server\d$: 602.53515625 Mbytes free Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:58:04 AM INF: Diskspace check for NT/Win2K Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:58:04 AM Disk space checking on \\server\d$: 606.48046875 Mbytes free Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:58:04 AM TO convert : (PID= 1),(PID= 2) to [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:58:04 AM Address TO convert : (TID= 2) to [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:58:04 AM Sending email message (server - Disk Space D: is DOWN) Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:58:28 AM Check cycle starts ( 6479- 6479) Another instance of the same problem --- Friday, April 23, 2004 8:41:08 AM INF: Diskspace check for NT/Win2K Friday, April 23, 2004 8:41:08 AM Disk space checking on \\server\d$: 14155.43359375 Mbytes free Alert set at 14154MB... No alert sent Friday, April 23, 2004 8:45:48 AM INF: Diskspace check for NT/Win2K Friday, April 23, 2004 8:45:48 AM Disk space checking on \\server\d$: 14151.88671875 Mbytes free Thanks for any help you can provide. Jason --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message
RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591
We've got the same issue that ServerAlive is getting a 99% utilization when checking on a W2K server, but i think it's normal because it's doing it's tasks as quick as possible. Maybe it's an option that Sa uses less CPU power ? Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dirk Bulinckx Verzonden: dinsdag 27 april 2004 21:07 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591 Can you get the same behaviour using a telnet client (when doing it by hand)? Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA 4.1R1591 H, you know, I was doing some Telnet checks to SA on an old NT4 box at the house. It seemed to do the same thing after several cycles. Never looked into it further because it's such a crappy server, so I wasn't completely surprised. But, maybe it's not the hardware... Michael Shook Technical Analyst Saddle Creek Corporation 723 Joe Tamplin Industrial Blvd Macon GA 31217 478 742 8740 ext. 105 (work) 478 256 9318 (mobile) 478 742 7917 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.saddlecrk.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/27/04 02:40PM I had a script that would log into Servers Alive at 1am and 6am via telnet 4301 and issue the start checking command. That way if someone disabled the checking because we had the network/san down but forgot to bring it back up, we'd still find out before 8am next morning. For some reason, servers alive seems to go to 99% utilization(at least intermittently) when I do that. I'm running the scripts using microsoft 2000 server edition scheduler and reflection. I'm also running the latest version of SA Web. I have turned off the scripts and the problem disappeared. Suggestions? The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any transmission error. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please immediately delete the e-mail and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender either by telephone or return e-mail. Any direct or indirect use, disclosure, distribution, printing, or copying of any part of this message is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of XOMA. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
RE: [***SPAM***] [SA-list] Run-time error '13': Type mismatch
Got the same problem with 1599 1600. Lots of element not found errors, and when editing it crashed, losing all my changes (yes i had to save it .. My fault) Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 23 april 2004 23:29 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [***SPAM***] [SA-list] Run-time error '13': Type mismatch When I was running Servers Alive 4.1.1591, I had several checks set up to check perfmon logical disk counters for free megabytes, but I constantly battled element not found errors. So I turned these checks off. Recently, I read on this list that the newest beta version (1599 at the time) resolved this element not found issue by checking disk space in a different way. However, when I upgraded to Servers Alive 4.1.1599, all of my perfmon checks began to fail, and any attempts to edit a perfmon check results in a Run-time error '13': Type mismatch message, after which Servers Alive crashes. I upgraded to beta 1600 today yet still see the same behavior. Any advice? I'd rather not recreate all of the perfmon checks if I don't have to. Thanks! -- Jim Vaughan FAX: 402-399-3533 Information Services / Telecommunications Networking Central States Health Life Co. of Omaha - http://www.cso.com --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
RE: [SA-list] Command not running
Maybe you can make future option (on the wish list for v6 ?) with the schedule to receive missed alert due to schedule when schedule's first time is reached (a sort of queue) Same issue here : some notifications i don't wish to receive at night via SMS/Mobile email, but i like to know something happened first thing in the morning around 7.30. Now i've set these alerts like you mentioned: 2 times down and every 15 cycles (cycle time 2 minutes) so when schedule is not allowing messages (22.00-07.00) i'll receive one between 7.00 and 7.30, but i still miss up/down situations at night and get an alert every 30 mins during a day. Can you put this on the 'wish-list'?? Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dirk Bulinckx Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2004 6:51 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Command not running The only way I can see to have the alert is to set the alert to 3 times down (and then every 5 (example)) and back up BUT this will give you more alerts then requested however. Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yann URBES Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Command not running Yes, i think this is one possible situation. What could i do to be alerted at 8pm ? In others situations, i don't have receive a mail with A 24h/24 scheduler. I made some tests and contact you. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dirk Bulinckx Envoye : lundi 19 avril 2004 19:01 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [SA-list] Command not running Could it be the following situation? Example: entry URL check (1) with alert send SMTP mail WHEN 1 times down and back up (2) with alert command to execute (sms) WHEN 2 times down and back up SCHEDULE from 8pm until 6am (3) with alert command to execute WHEN 3 times down and backup SCHEDULe from 8pm until 6am 7:00pm URL check is down = SMTP mail is send 7:02pm next cycle and URL check is down again = nothing is done : the WHEN part of alert (2) says that it should be done however due to the schedule the alert is not send. 8:01pm URL is still down = this is the 31st cycle that it's down, so no additional alert should be done 8:03pm URL is sill down = this is the 32nd cylce that it's down, so no additional alert should be done First the WHEN part is evaluated and if that gives a true we check the schedule. At 7:02 (2nd down cycle) the WHEN part of (2) does gives up a TRUE (execute alert) BUT the schedule says not to do the alert, that's why there is no alert (2) done at that moment. Then at 8:01pm (first check after 8pm) the WHEN part of alert (2) is evaluated and gives a false (being don't do this alert), so we're not even checking the schedule. Could it be this condition? Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yann URBES Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Command not running Sorry for my poor english. I own en entreprise Version to use schedulers. SA check web sites and mails server. 3 differents actions are sends on each alarm : one mail (1 times down and backup) 24/24 one SMS with Command script (2 times down and backup) during the Night only one phone call with Command script (3 times down and backup) during the Night only When all the schedules are ok. no commands are launch. When i disable the schedule all commands are perfectly launch. I've tried many possibilities, some time it works, some time it doesn't. Can't find a rule. it give me some stress. Thanks for your Help. Best regards. Yann URBES Antipode tele services www.antipode.biz skype : antipode_teleservices New Caledonia --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
RE: [SA-list] Command not running
Oké but in some circumstances those messages are pretty useful.. (like diskspace during night of a certain process) But the option of a active down condition would sure help a lot in most cases ! So please :-) Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dirk Bulinckx Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2004 12:00 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Command not running So you even would want to get all the up/down/up of the night after the schedule? This could be a lot of useless alerts. I can understand that you want to know that the problem is still active ... Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Roelofs Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Command not running Maybe you can make future option (on the wish list for v6 ?) with the schedule to receive missed alert due to schedule when schedule's first time is reached (a sort of queue) Same issue here : some notifications i don't wish to receive at night via SMS/Mobile email, but i like to know something happened first thing in the morning around 7.30. Now i've set these alerts like you mentioned: 2 times down and every 15 cycles (cycle time 2 minutes) so when schedule is not allowing messages (22.00-07.00) i'll receive one between 7.00 and 7.30, but i still miss up/down situations at night and get an alert every 30 mins during a day. Can you put this on the 'wish-list'?? Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dirk Bulinckx Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2004 6:51 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Command not running The only way I can see to have the alert is to set the alert to 3 times down (and then every 5 (example)) and back up BUT this will give you more alerts then requested however. Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yann URBES Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Command not running Yes, i think this is one possible situation. What could i do to be alerted at 8pm ? In others situations, i don't have receive a mail with A 24h/24 scheduler. I made some tests and contact you. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dirk Bulinckx Envoye : lundi 19 avril 2004 19:01 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [SA-list] Command not running Could it be the following situation? Example: entry URL check (1) with alert send SMTP mail WHEN 1 times down and back up (2) with alert command to execute (sms) WHEN 2 times down and back up SCHEDULE from 8pm until 6am (3) with alert command to execute WHEN 3 times down and backup SCHEDULe from 8pm until 6am 7:00pm URL check is down = SMTP mail is send 7:02pm next cycle and URL check is down again = nothing is done : the WHEN part of alert (2) says that it should be done however due to the schedule the alert is not send. 8:01pm URL is still down = this is the 31st cycle that it's down, so no additional alert should be done 8:03pm URL is sill down = this is the 32nd cylce that it's down, so no additional alert should be done First the WHEN part is evaluated and if that gives a true we check the schedule. At 7:02 (2nd down cycle) the WHEN part of (2) does gives up a TRUE (execute alert) BUT the schedule says not to do the alert, that's why there is no alert (2) done at that moment. Then at 8:01pm (first check after 8pm) the WHEN part of alert (2) is evaluated and gives a false (being don't do this alert), so we're not even checking the schedule. Could it be this condition? Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yann URBES Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Command not running Sorry for my poor english. I own en entreprise Version to use schedulers. SA check web sites and mails server. 3 differents actions are sends on each alarm : one mail (1 times down and backup) 24/24 one SMS with Command script (2 times down and backup) during the Night only one phone call with Command script (3 times down
RE: [SA-list] Slow GUI 'come back' (WAS:'Feature Req - Delete multiple Hosts at once')
That's strange! It's an (old) PIII 700 machine with 512mb ram and W2K pro Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dirk Bulinckx Verzonden: donderdag 15 april 2004 9:29 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Slow GUI 'come back' (WAS:'Feature Req - Delete multiple Hosts at once') With your hostfile and your groups.grp file: delete of an entry: about 1 second move of an entry: 4 seconds Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Roelofs Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Slow GUI 'come back' (WAS:'Feature Req - Delete multiple Hosts at once') Same issue here also with about 50 entries, takes about a minute to get the controls back Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 13 april 2004 23:43 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [SA-list] Feature Req - Delete multiple Hosts at once snap One of the reasons for this request, apart from convenience, is that since upgrading from SA v3.x to v4.x I find that when I delete a host entry the GUI takes around 1 minute to come back and allow me to interact with it. Maybe this in itself is not normal? This may be tied to the fact that when I first start SA it takes 2-3 minutes for the GUI to become responsive as it loads the host file. I only have 174 checks in my host file. snap --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
RE: [SA-list] Scroll GUI problem (1591)
So it looks like an issue only in 1591. In the previous release i hadn't this problem. Here running on W2K Pro SP3 Mike Roelofs UC Systems B.V. E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Michael Shook Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 14:27 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: [SA-list] Scroll GUI problem (1591) I'm glad it wasn't just me that saw this problem. I didn't really need the scroll during updates feature, so turned it off, but I thought for a while I was screwing it up. NT4.0 SP6a : sa 4.1.0.1591 Michael Shook Technical Analyst Saddle Creek Corporation 723 Joe Tamplin Industrial Blvd Macon GA 31217 478 742 8740 ext. 105 (work) 478 256 9318 (mobile) 478 742 7917 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.saddlecrk.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/04 05:02AM In release 1591 i have the following issue: With Scroll enabled, entries get highlighted (like clicking on it) during the scrolling, even if i don't touch the mouse. This is very annoying because the color of entry can't be seen anymore, and so from a distance look on the screen i can't see the status anymore. Clicking on an entry solves this, until the next cycle. Same thing happens. Tried on another machine too, same issue. Mike --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
