Re: test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a remark - if my last post came to you broken (like only 3 sentences), then ignore it, please. I wrote quite a long one, but it was cutted down and I don't know the reason.Sorry for inconvienence!ellvisYeah, it was only three lines... it seems to say enough though :)Nice to see SAM in one of the well known Party`s *_+Cal...--- To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
RE: test
I can categorically say that it didnt work -Original Message- From: Frans van Egmond [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:35 PM To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Subject: Re: test David Ledbury wrote: - Original Message - From: Frans v. Egmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM Subject: Re: test Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: test I hear you !!! I hear me as well. Then I think its safe to say the test has succeeded... Unless ofcourse that wasn't what was being tested...
Re: test
Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: test I hear you !!!
Re: test
- Original Message - From: Frans v. Egmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM Subject: Re: test Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: test I hear you !!! I hear me as well.
Re: test
David Ledbury wrote: - Original Message - From: Frans v. Egmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 PM Subject: Re: test Quoting Aley Keprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: test I hear you !!! I hear me as well. Then I think its safe to say the test has succeeded... Unless ofcourse that wasn't what was being tested...
Re: test
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:51:32PM +0100, David Ledbury wrote: I hear me as well. Ah, but can you still hear the Voices? -- Paul The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
RE: test
123 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aley Keprt Sent: 08 May 2001 14:19 To: Sam Users Subject: test test
Re: TEST, PLEASE IGNORE...
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Chris Pile wrote: This is a test to see if I've entered the SAM group address in my address book correctly... Looks like it. (someone had too!) @/ .@/ Unc - Tim Paveley - Moderator of The Games Room Ascii Animations http://www.mono.org/~unc/
Re: test
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote: Can't remember. Still seems to work, though. Erm I thought you said it didn't ... Did for the other lists, for some strange reason.
Re: test
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote: I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work... Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/
Re: test
Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote: I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work... Leave me alone, it was a case of fingers before brain... :/ Ooh my speciality ... -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it Playing with blocks
Re: test
Paul Walker wrote: 'scuse me, just one quick test. And here's another
Re: test
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote: 'scuse me, just one quick test. And here's another Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why.
Re: test
Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David wrote: Didn't work, unfortunately. :/ Every other list I'm on gets filtered into the right place by procmail, except sam-users. God knows why. Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type debate but what's your recipe ? Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it Playing with blocks
Re: test
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote: Well OK, I realise that this is just asking for another mousse type debate but what's your recipe ? Apologies for non-unix people... === MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log VERBOSE=on LOGABSTRACT=all # Back it all up (doesn't work?!) :O c backup # Mailing list section # this doesn't work either :/ :O: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] sam-users :O: * ^From.fsf-list fsf-list :O: * ^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] monkeyjunkies # Rudimentary junkmail filtering :O: B * !^FROM_DAEMON * make money fast * million email addresses * ^From.webpromote junk ==
Re: test
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said: # Back it all up (doesn't work?!) :O c backup # Mailing list section # this doesn't work either :/ :O: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] sam-users [snip] OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0? The subsidiary question is what character you expect to be matched by the dot, except for a space. imc
Re: test
Ian Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OnMon, 19 Oct 1998 12:15:30 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said: # Back it all up (doesn't work?!) :O c backup # Mailing list section # this doesn't work either :/ :O: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] sam-users [snip] OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0? Yep, problem numero uno ... The subsidiary question is what character you expect to be matched by the dot, except for a space. I'd guess that he just expects one space to be there, I'd recommend something along the lines of ^From.*owner-sam-users which should cover it pretty well, at least it works for me in my .gnus which filters in pretty much the same way as procmail (Well sort-of) Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it Playing with blocks
Re: test
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote: OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0? Can't remember. Still seems to work, though. The subsidiary question is what character you expect to be matched by the dot, except for a space. Just a space.
Re: test
On 19 Oct 1998, Lee Willis wrote: OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0? Yep, problem numero uno ... I was confused by the fact that all the other lists filtered okay, and they had a :O there as well. Changed it now and it's working, so.. :) I'd guess that he just expects one space to be there, I'd recommend something along the lines of ^From.*owner-sam-users I'll bear it in mind, but the majordomo s/w at nvg.ntnu.no only seems to put one space in there, so...
Re: test
Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote: OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0? Can't remember. Still seems to work, though. Erm I thought you said it didn't ... Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it Playing with blocks
Re: test
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:44:12 +0100 (BST), Paul Walker said: On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Ian Collier wrote: OK, first question... why are you writing :O instead of :0? Can't remember. Still seems to work, though. I thought you started this thread precisely because it doesn't work... imc
Re: test
On 19 Oct 1998 14:47:57 +0100, Lee Willis said: I'd guess that he just expects one space to be there, I'd recommend something along the lines of ^From.*owner-sam-users which should cover it pretty well But there's only one From line which ever contains owner-sam-users and that's the envelope From line. Also there is only one other kind of From line and that's the From: line. Generality is all very well but in this case you don't need it. imc
