RE: [Samba] Slow and bad performance on large dirs.
I believe this is more a filesystem issue than a Samba one. Using ext2/ext3 browsing directories with many files will be slow as it constructs lists for the entries to display. Filesystems like XFS and ReiserFS use binary trees which skip this step, so you might want to find a distribution or kernel to support filesystems like these. I wonder if your copy would go faster if you did not use Windows Exlporer to do the copying, bearing in mind it tries to continually refresh the directory contents. Maybe try using xcopy and see if that is an improvement. Purely my own experience but I have found copying files using the Windows Java version of Midnight Commander is very, very fast. HTH Noel -Original Message- From: Harrison Xing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2002 07:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Slow and bad performance on large dirs. Hi, We had a severe problem with samba with very large directories, e.g. 100,000 files. The file copy speed is becoming slower and slower, and it is a few times slower compared with the data when the files to be copied are already on the server. Anyone has good ideas about how to solve this? By simply checking the code, I found at smbd/filename.c, if the files are not found on the server, it will do a scan_directory which might be very slow if the directory is large. Are there anyway to avoid this searching? Thanks. -- Best Regards, Harrison -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.7 compile error using --with-acl-support on debian
hi, i'm trying to package samba2.2.7 on a debian woody, using --with-acl-support. the configure part seems ok, but when the compile starts i get a lot of errors.. what's wrong? attached the sensitive part of the dpkg-buildpackage output. thanks -- Francesco Mosca [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin/make -C source all nsswitch/libnss_wins.so make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/samba-2.2.7/source' Using FLAGS = -O -O2 -D_REENTRANT -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOGFILEBASE=/var/log/samba -DCONFIGFILE=/etc/samba/smb.conf -DLMHOSTSFILE=/etc/samba/lmhosts -DSWATDIR=/usr/share/samba/swat -DSBINDIR=/usr/sbin -DLOCKDIR=/var/run/samba -DCODEPAGEDIR=/usr/share/samba/codepages -DDRIVERFILE=/etc/samba/printers.def -DBINDIR=/usr/bin -DPIDDIR=/var/run/samba -DLIBDIR=/usr/lib -DVARDIR=/var -DHAVE_INCLUDES_H -DPASSWD_PROGRAM=/usr/bin/passwd -DSMB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd -DTDB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd.tdb Using FLAGS32 = -O -O2 -D_REENTRANT -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOGFILEBASE=/var/log/samba -DCONFIGFILE=/etc/samba/smb.conf -DLMHOSTSFILE=/etc/samba/lmhosts -DSWATDIR=/usr/share/samba/swat -DSBINDIR=/usr/sbin -DLOCKDIR=/var/run/samba -DCODEPAGEDIR=/usr/share/samba/codepages -DDRIVERFILE=/etc/samba/printers.def -DBINDIR=/usr/bin -DPIDDIR=/var/run/samba -DLIBDIR=/usr/lib -DVARDIR=/var -DHAVE_INCLUDES_H -DPASSWD_PROGRAM=/usr/bin/passwd -DSMB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd -DTDB_PASSWD_FILE=/etc/samba/smbpasswd.tdb Using LIBS = -lacl -lcups -lnsl -lcrypt -ldl -lpam Compiling smbd/server.c In file included from include/smb.h:462, from include/includes.h:677, from smbd/server.c:22: include/vfs.h:111: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:112: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:113: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:114: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:115: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union include/vfs.h:116: parse error before `*' include/vfs.h:116: `acl_t' declared as function returning a function include/vfs.h:116: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/vfs.h:117: parse error before `acl_permset_t' include/vfs.h:118: parse error before `acl_permset_t' include/vfs.h:119: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:120: parse error before `*' include/vfs.h:120: `acl_t' declared as function returning a function include/vfs.h:120: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/vfs.h:121: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:122: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:123: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:124: parse error before `acl_entry_t' include/vfs.h:125: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:126: parse error before `acl_type_t' include/vfs.h:127: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:129: parse error before `acl_permset_t' include/vfs.h:131: parse error before `acl_t' include/vfs.h:132: parse error before `acl_tag_t' In file included from include/includes.h:677, from smbd/server.c:22: include/smb.h:480: field `vfs_ops' has incomplete type In file included from include/includes.h:737, from smbd/server.c:22: include/proto.h:211: parse error before `the_acl' include/proto.h:212: parse error before `entry_d' include/proto.h:213: parse error before `entry_d' include/proto.h:214: parse error before `entry_d' include/proto.h:215: parse error before `sys_acl_get_file' include/proto.h:215: parse error before `acl_type_t' include/proto.h:215: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/proto.h:216: parse error before `sys_acl_get_fd' include/proto.h:216: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/proto.h:217: parse error before `permset' include/proto.h:217: `sys_acl_clear_perms' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:117: previous declaration of `sys_acl_clear_perms' include/proto.h:218: parse error before `permset' include/proto.h:218: `sys_acl_add_perm' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:118: previous declaration of `sys_acl_add_perm' include/proto.h:219: parse error before `permset' include/proto.h:219: `sys_acl_get_perm' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:129: previous declaration of `sys_acl_get_perm' include/proto.h:220: parse error before `the_acl' include/proto.h:220: `sys_acl_to_text' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:119: previous declaration of `sys_acl_to_text' include/proto.h:221: parse error before `sys_acl_init' include/proto.h:221: warning: data definition has no type or storage class include/proto.h:222: parse error before `*' include/proto.h:222: `sys_acl_create_entry' redeclared as different kind of symbol include/vfs.h:121: previous declaration of `sys_acl_create_entry' include/proto.h:223: parse error
Re: [Samba] %U in include
I had problem with %U in include tag in configuration file smb.conf. I try explain the problem. When I connecting from Windows (domain) the samba server doesn't properly include file. E.g.: smb.conf include = smb.conf.%U It include only smb.conf. at first time. I find no information about it so I try write patch for it. Please could you say me, if it's wrong? I have no problem with it for few days. I write it again 3.0 CVS branch. I see the problem in 2.2 too. Please send reply with cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I'm not list member. This was fixed in 2.2.7 (and also in the HEAD/SAMBA_3_0 branches) a few days ago. Is it still not working for you? Now I see what you point me: | RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/smbd/service.c,v | retrieving revision 1.85.2.4 | retrieving revision 1.85.2.5 | diff -u -r1.85.2.4 -r1.85.2.5 | --- samba/source/smbd/service.c 2002/11/12 23:20:49 1.85.2.4 | +++ samba/source/smbd/service.c 2002/11/18 06:12:47 1.85.2.5 | @@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ | *status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE; | return NULL; | } | + | + /* the %U substitution may have changed */ | + reload_services(True); | | /* Remember that a different vuid can connect later without these checks But if I follow CVS instruction to download (from http://samba.kn.vutbr.cz/samba/cvs.html - czech mirror), I can't get service.c with this patch. CVS command: cvs -z5 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_3_0 samba What I do wrong? I'll try it with this patch on Monday as I'm not at work now. Thanks a lot Luf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] w2k-client and ntconfig.pol...
Hi,
after setting up samba 2.2.3a as a PDC and connecting
a few NT4- and W2k-Clients to the PDC (which worked fine without
any problems), I tried to install a policy to redirect some
folders in the user profiles. I used poledit to create
a policy with modified 'Shell Folders' and 'User Shell
Folders' keys and copied it to the netlogon share. This is where
the problems started: The NT4-Clients worked as expected,
modified folders, no further problems, but the W2k-clients
stopped allowing users to login. Every time a user tries
to login to a W2k machine, the login process seems to starts
after passwor validation, stopping very soon with a userenv 1000 error
message ('DETAIL - Fuer diesen Befehl ist nicht genuegend
Speicher verfuegbar', roughly translated: Not enough
memory for this command). After clicking OK, the login
prompt appears again.
Locking into the samba logfiles reveals something which
looks kinda strange to me:
luna.log:
...
libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(93) sess_key :
libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(94) stor_cred:
...
rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206):
api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON.
rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200)
api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed.
...
The network worked flawless without the group policy, and I didn't
change anything else. The problem is reproducible (I installed a
test network with samba, one NT4- and one W2k-Machine, same results).
Anybody out there using W2k-Clients with redirected
user profile folders ? Anybody out there knowing a solution
for this problem ?
Thanks,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] %U in include
I had problem with %U in include tag in configuration file smb.conf. I try explain the problem. When I connecting from Windows (domain) the samba server doesn't properly include file. E.g.: smb.conf include = smb.conf.%U It include only smb.conf. at first time. Please send reply with cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I'm not list member. This was fixed in 2.2.7 (and also in the HEAD/SAMBA_3_0 branches) a few days ago. Is it still not working for you? Now I see what you point me: | RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/smbd/service.c,v | retrieving revision 1.85.2.4 | retrieving revision 1.85.2.5 | diff -u -r1.85.2.4 -r1.85.2.5 | --- samba/source/smbd/service.c 2002/11/12 23:20:49 1.85.2.4 | +++ samba/source/smbd/service.c 2002/11/18 06:12:47 1.85.2.5 | @@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ | *status = NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE; | return NULL; | } | + | + /* the %U substitution may have changed */ | + reload_services(True); | | /* Remember that a different vuid can connect later without these checks I'll try it with this patch on Monday as I'm not at work now. Someone else was there so I can test it. It doesn't work properly at first attempt. If I try it second time it work. I add into patch (before /* the %U substitution may have changed */): | DEBUG(0,(make_connection_snum: Try to reload services with user |%s\n,current_user_info.smb_name)); Of course I add into make_connection_snum: | extern userdom_struct current_user_info; And the log output is: [2002/11/23 14:25:18, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(616) make_connection_snum: Try to reload services with user [2002/11/23 14:25:19, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(836) theia (147.251.48.123) couldn't find service luf [2002/11/23 14:25:24, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(616) make_connection_snum: Try to reload services with user luf [2002/11/23 14:25:24, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(616) make_connection_snum: Try to reload services with user luf I define service luf in included smb.conf.luf I can't do it with special homes share. Luf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Date Problems.
Hi! I have installed the latest 2.2.6 SMB client and Server on a Red Hat 7.2 distribution. Now the problem is that the clients connection from Windows PC whenever they save any files to the shares on the Linux File Server (Samba) PC, the date appears to be 4 1/2 hours ahead. E.g. If the actual time now is 20:00 hrs on 23rd of November the date and time comes as 00:30 hrs on 24th November. Please help on this issue. Is this a feature? and if so how can it be avoided? Thank you Gagneet -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Swat: can't authorize
Hello, i have a SuSE8.0 machine running samba and swat. I want to configure my smb.conf from another host with swat. But the authorization fails. User root is already added with smbpasswd -a root. Anyone an idea what to do? Thanks Michael Fritzsch -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] swat: can't authorize
Hello, i have a SuSE8.0 machine running samba and swat. I want to configure my smb.conf from another host with swat. But the authorization fails. User root is already added with smbpasswd -a root. Anyone an idea what to do? Thanks Michael Fritzsch -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] smbd weirdness
Michael, Have you run the smbclient -L servername while logged in as a user that has access to the server? Do this from a terminal connection that is on the Samba server in question. This should give you some information as to why it isn't quite doing what it should be doing. Another thing that might have occurred is that during your upgrade one or more libraries and other packages, that the hand-built Samba install was dependent upon could have been changed or replaced with something that your Samba install is unable to utilize. If you are running Redhat and upgraded to 7.3 or even 8.0 do a quick check by uninstalling or simply moving your current Samba install and replace it with the latest RPM version of it. During the RPM install you should either receive several errors about missing libraries and such or have a clean install occur. If the latter happens put your settings into the smb.conf created by the RPM and see what happens. I have a feeling that one or more packages were inadvertently skipped or added to the install at this one site, that hadn't been done to the other servers that were upgraded. I hope that helps, let me know if my suggestion takes care of the issue. Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. Ph. 586-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804 -Original Message- From: Michael Robinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:21 PM To: Robert Adkins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] smbd weirdness Michael, I am unsure what you mean by locked out could you clarify? Do you mean that they connect and are able to browse, read and write to files in the share, but when the users come back to the share later they are unable to do those tasks, or are you saying that they are never able to see the server and that when they attempt to connect to the server/share, they are given the message that they are unable to connect. I would confirm that all the file permissions are properly set for the shares. Other then that, I am unsure what could be causing your issues. the windows client is unable to connect, the message is that the server is not found. Upon examining the job table, there are several smbd instances running and no clients connected. This is a vanilla installation at a site that has been working for a couple of years. The other site belongs to them as well. I recently upgraded the OS to a newer version of linux distribution and kernel though the samba distributions were built by hand. Only one site exhibits this behavior. The problem is intermittant in that when it does happen I find the running copies of smbd whereas normally there would be none unless a client connected. I dont' understand why smbd terminates properly under some circumstances and not others.??? Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. Ph. 586-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804 -Original Message- From: Michael Robinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins Subject: [Samba] smbd weirdness I have two identical installations of samba v2.25 on linux boxes. On one system everything works fine but on the other, copies of smbd start but never terminate. The result is that the winduhs boxes that are trying to access the samba share get locked out and never find the samba server. The configurations of the two systems are identical and I am unable to determine why one works and the other does not. smbd and nmbd are started from inetd. Any ideas. Michael -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Domaine pas disponible
Hello! Ma machine client Win2k a pu rejoindre le domaine. La machine est inscrite comme utilisateur du domaine avec le $ en fin de nom. Les utilisateurs sont présents dans Unix et dans Samba. J'ai créé un partage sur le serveur. Pourtant, j'ai toujours le message suivant à la connexion de la session: Le système n'a pas pu ouvrir de session, car le MDKGROUP n'est pas disponible. Je suis sous MANDRAKE 9.0 Merci de vos idées. Cordiales salutations. Jean-Jacques Antille -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.7 and printer status
Hallo Samba-Team, thank you for 2.2.7. The only problem I found is an old one: status of printers served from samba on Windows 2000 I'll try to explain this so clear as possible: If I have a Windows user Administrator, which is in Windows administrative group Administratoren and this user is on Samba-side *mapped* to root -- printer status is *ok*. If I have a Windows user test which is in Windows normal user group Benutzer and this user is on Samba-side *not mapped* to root -- printer status is *ok*. If I have a Windows user test which is in Windows administrative group Administratoren and this user is on Samba-side *not mapped* to root -- printer status is *not ok*: Zugriff verweigert; keine Verbindung möglich (access not permittet; no connection available) printing is available Relevant Information for printing in smb.conf: Global: admin users = root printing = lprng printcap name = /etc/printcap printer admin = root load printers = no print command = chmod 666 %s;\ name=`echo '%J' | sed s/^.*- //` ;\ /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -J$name %s;\ rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p -L lpq cache time = 4 lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release %p %j queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p Printer Share: [pr1] comment = local printer pr1 on %h browseable = yes printable = yes public = yes create mode = 0700 path = /tmp Relevant Information for printing in printcap: pr1: :done_jobs=0 :rw :sh :lp=/dev/lp0 :sd=/var/spool/lpd/pr1 :fx=flp Relevant Information for printing in lpd.conf: check_for_nonprintable@ force_localhost client_config_file=/etc/lpd.conf filter_ld_path=/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/local/lib filter_path=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr /lib/filters:/usr/X11R6/bin mail_operator_on_error=root pr=/usr/bin/pr printcap_path=/etc/printcap printer_perms_path=/etc/lpd.perms server_config_file=/etc/lpd.conf server_user=lp user=lp group=lp send_data_first@ Relevant Information for printing in lpd.perms: ACCEPT SERVICE=C SERVER REMOTEUSER=root ACCEPT SERVICE=C LPC=lpd,status,printcap REJECT SERVICE=C ACCEPT SERVICE=M SAMEHOST SAMEUSER ACCEPT SERVICE=M SERVER REMOTEUSER=root REJECT SERVICE=M DEFAULT ACCEPT Thanks for your interest tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrading to Samba 2.2.7
I'm running Red Hat version 7.2 as server. It has been fully upgraded from Red Hat UP2DATE. Samba 2.2.3a is currently running on the server with a working smb.conf file. I've noted a lot of comments/suggestions to upgrade to Samba 2.2.7. I find 2 files on the samba.org site for Red Hat 7.x: samba2.2.7-1.i386.rpm and samba2.2.7.src.rpm When trying to install with the Package Manager I get: samba2.2.7-1.i386.rpm needs libcups.so.2 Apparently Samba 2.2.7 requires CUPS installed? Now in the process of downloading. samba2.2.7.src.rpm error dialog box listing the rpm name. Something else I need to be dong? Perhaps I got a corrupt file? Since RPMs are available relly hate to have to build form the binaries.. Tom Winfield -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] unable to connect to a share, error message: string overflow
Hello list, after upgrading from samba 2.2.5 to 2.2.6 or 2.2.7 I get a whole bunch (in fact thousands of them) of the following error messages in my smb.log ERROR: string overflow by 10 in string_sub(%u, 7) [2002/11/23 18:46:51, 0] lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1188) ERROR: string overflow by 10 in string_sub(%u, 7) ERROR: string overflow by 10 in string_sub(%u, 7) [2002/11/23 18:46:51, 0] lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1188) [2002/11/23 18:46:51, 0] lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1188) . . . when trying to connect to a share. Of course the connect fails. What is happening here? It certainly looks like a string (the username perhaps?) is too long but it worked perfectly before. What can I do about that? Thanks Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active Directory server? I have some vague notion that this can be accomplished by using a combination of OpenLDAP, Samba, MIT Kerberos, and the OpenAFS file system. To say the least, the descriptions I have found have been vague as to whether or not I will be able to completely replace the functionality of an Active Directory server with a similar setup. If this is possible, could someone point me to reasonably good documentation on the subject? Thanks so much. --David From the number of replies I received on this,(none) it seems fair to assume that this is not entirely possible. Anyone able to tell me what the current limitations are? I would really like to set up a system using samba as much as possible for domain and file serving operations. I suppose I can supplement samba with a win2k server if I have to... ;-) Thanks, David -- |\_/| (\ /) ) (//^\ ( M ) (_)_(_) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active Directory server? I have some vague notion that this can be accomplished by using a combination of OpenLDAP, Samba, MIT Kerberos, and the OpenAFS file system. To say the least, the descriptions I have found have been vague as to whether or not I will be able to completely replace the functionality of an Active Directory server with a similar setup. If this is possible, could someone point me to reasonably good documentation on the subject? Thanks so much. --David From the number of replies I received on this,(none) it seems fair to assume that this is not entirely possible. Anyone able to tell me what the current limitations are? I would really like to set up a system using samba as much as possible for domain and file serving operations. I suppose I can supplement samba with a win2k server if I have to... ;-) samba can't serve active directory you might not really need it. samba does work great as a PDC for large numbers of XP and NT/2k workstations brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC Problems...
I've checked all the settings in the smb.conf against the man pages, all seem correct. What else could I be missing? Why can't it see the server? The following is my config file. /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = THEMOLE netbios name = TATTY netbios aliases = PDC server string = Samba Server %v encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 printcap name = lpstat domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes preload = pdf-generator printing = cups security = user local master = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [print$] path = /var/lib/samba/printers write list = @adm root [pdf-generator] comment = PDF Generator (only valid users) path = /var/tmp printable = Yes print command = /usr/share/samba/scripts/print-pdf %s ~%u %L%u %m %I [netlogon] path = /home/netlogon write list = root -- ::TheMole::. did i mistake your words? did i betray your well worn trust? http://themole.yi.org ~ http://www.buhsnarf.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: PDC Problem...
have a look at my logfile at : http://buhsnarf.net/log.html Thanks, again. -- ::TheMole::. did i mistake your words? did i betray your well worn trust? http://themole.yi.org ~ http://www.buhsnarf.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot enable encrypted password
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 15:39, mricks wrote: when I enable encrypted passwords this error will completly fill up my /var/log/messages this only occurs with Samba release 2.2.6 and 2.2.7 ( 2.2.5) runs OK! lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1217) [1520]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 in string_sub(%u, 7) try changing that %u to %U i think i saw that in a previous post - dunno why it might help... brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Password woes...
Hi All, Moving up from 2.0.7 to 2.2.6 is taking it's toll, but I'm getting there... Right now I'm stuck on the smbpasswd stuff. With 2.0.7 I don't maintain one (AFAIK). All users have UNIX accounts on the old machine, and I'm porting over the passwd file to this new one. I have no idea what their passwords are, and up till now, they simply change their UNIX passwd and SAMBA happily uses it. Why can't I, or how do I do this with 2.2.6? TIA Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC Problems...
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 20:09, Brett Cook wrote: I don't see an obvious problem with your conf file... the nmbd log you posted looks okay too. please post the log.smbd of a machine trying to join the domain. what kind of failure do you see? does it fail to log on, what is the client, etc? brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Password woes...
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 22:54, Steve Morley wrote: Hi All, Moving up from 2.0.7 to 2.2.6 is taking it's toll, but I'm getting there... Right now I'm stuck on the smbpasswd stuff. With 2.0.7 I don't maintain one (AFAIK). All users have UNIX accounts on the old machine, and I'm porting over the passwd file to this new one. I have no idea what their passwords are, and up till now, they simply change their UNIX passwd and SAMBA happily uses it. it's fairly easy to keep the passwords in sync... just set up samba to change the unix passwords with the unix password chat stuff in smb.conf use pam_smbpass to make pam update the samba password when the unix password is updated. you can script add the users with smbpasswd -a but they'll all have to set their own passwords. If you REALLY don't want users to have to do anything you could probably crack the whole unix passwd database (if you're using cryped passwords) in a week or two. Why can't I, or how do I do this with 2.2.6? you must have been using unencrypted passwords... I strongly suggest using encrypted passwords but i think it is still possible to use unencrypted passwords (and no smbpasswd) with 2.2.7 I'm not sure about that, and I don't know how to do it. brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] How to compile samba-2.2.x on HP/UX 11.00
Hi, Here's my problem: Samba-2.2.x (even 2.2.7) compiled right out of the box on HP/UX 11.00 gives some errors in the log file: Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]: [2002/11/23 16:17:32, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(661) Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]: posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]: [2002/11/23 16:17:32, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(662) Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]: an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets I've checked but the filesystem is local and a locking test program compiled with the same definitions (_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE) gave the same results. Whenever _LAGEFILE64_SOURCE is defined the upperlimit for offset is 2Gb otherwise EINVAL is returned. So I thought adding _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 would do the trick. Upperlimit for locking got raised beyond 2Gb and my locking test program showed me this. But now the tdb code starts acting up. Nov 23 14:43:24 pandora nmbd[13772]: [2002/11/23 14:43:24, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) Nov 23 14:43:24 pandora nmbd[13772]: tdb(/usr/local/samba-2.2.7/var/locks/unexpected.tdb): tdb_oob len 1718185085 beyond eof at 696 The len is always 1718185085 only eof changes in between error logs. Is there anyone with some knowledge of HP/UX and who can point me at the errors I make??? Thanks in advance, BTW. I can get samba error free by removing _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE and adding _LARGEFILE_SOURCE (64 left out). But am I missing out on some specialities? -- René Nieuwenhuizen Afdeling Informatietechnologie Centraal Planbureau Bezoekadres: Van Stolkweg 14, 2585 JR Den Haag Postadres: Postbus 80510, 2508 GM Den Haag T (070) 3383 342 F (070) 3383 350 I http://www.cpb.nl/nl/general/org/afdelingen/it/ -- Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Het bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en de inhoud van het bericht te vernietigen. This message shall not constitute any obligations. This message is intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please inform us immediately and delete its contents. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba, LDAP, PDC and udding users
Hi all! I've had a lot of success setting up Samba PDC's using the LDAP-SAM backend, and got password sync working between Unix (LDAP) passwords and Samba passwords. I can also have other Linux boxes use Winbind to auth vrs. the PDC and thus achieve the same password sync functionality (i.e., Samba changes both PAM and Samba passwords, as well as checking them). Naturally, this also works for Windows machines (i.e., user changes his windows password and his Unix password is likewise synched). This all works fine, but I have a couple of questions regarding stuff I've seen around here, but have not seen in stable versions yet: 1) I remember seeing something like add machine script similar to the add user script - or a mention to it - to allow separate mechanics for Machine account adding and User account adding. How hard does anybody think it would be to add this config file parameter and the corresponding implementation? Would it be worth it seeing as this is likely to be included in 3.0? 2) Is it currently possible to have Samba check for machine accounts under a different LDAP branch than user accounts? This would ease admin and maintenance of the machine account set, for obvious reasons. Is this planned for 3.0? How hard does anybody think it would be to add two config parameters: ldap user suffix and ldap machine suffix to allow Samba to do this? Again - is this worth it seeing as this could be postponed to 3.0? 3) Are there any plans for calculating the user/machine SID based on the Unix uid? i.e., so that when Winbind gets the user list from a PDC, it can use PDC-provided Userid's (eliminating the first-come first-served UID assignment currently being used)? I'd like to contribute to these - but I need a couple of pointers: 1) Where do I find the implementation of the call to add user script and the corresponding reading of the config value? 2) Where do I find the implementation of the LDAP code which uses ldap suffix, and the code which finds user/machine accounts in LDAP? 3) Any additional advice/tips? Best Diego -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Shared roaming profiles for all users (XP)?
On 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:46, xfesty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya. Is there anyway to make non changable roaming profiles for all users with XP workstations, and Samba 3.0HEAD from CVS acting as a PDC? I'm setting up a bunch of workstations for an internet cafe, and all users need to basically have the same settings (i.e. desktop icons, Internet Explorer settings, start menu items, etc.) as others, yet not be able to change them. I tried setting the profile dir to the same for all users, and making it read only, but I'm experiencing two problems - (1) XP will refuse to load the profile if its read-only, and (2) XP won't load the profile if it wasn't created by the same user. I'm also finding cookies in IE sometimes aren't being properly set, people can't view hotmail attachments, MSN messenger refuses to work, and a bunch of other oddities. Anyway past this? I remember back when I was using Windows 2K Server as a PDC, it was possible to have this. If the ntuser.dat is renamed ntuser.man, and you make the profile owned by root, read-only to the suer, and you set root to have rid 500 in LDAP, does it work? (ie add root to ldap, then change the RID). The SID is stred inside the NTUser.DAT file. Access control (the ACE) is stored inside the file. That is what Rishard Sharpe was working on decoding recently. When his work is done we will be able to set our own ACE's inside the NTUser.DAT file and thus create from any profile a global per group or a global group mandatory profile. Just setting file ownership and permissions does not get one past the hurdle of the ACE inside the file. - John T. I think this is the standard way this is done on NT. Andrew Bartlett -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared roaming profiles for all users (XP)?
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 19:01, John H Terpstra wrote: On 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:46, xfesty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya. Is there anyway to make non changable roaming profiles for all users with XP workstations, and Samba 3.0HEAD from CVS acting as a PDC? I'm setting up a bunch of workstations for an internet cafe, and all users need to basically have the same settings (i.e. desktop icons, Internet Explorer settings, start menu items, etc.) as others, yet not be able to change them. I tried setting the profile dir to the same for all users, and making it read only, but I'm experiencing two problems - (1) XP will refuse to load the profile if its read-only, and (2) XP won't load the profile if it wasn't created by the same user. I'm also finding cookies in IE sometimes aren't being properly set, people can't view hotmail attachments, MSN messenger refuses to work, and a bunch of other oddities. Anyway past this? I remember back when I was using Windows 2K Server as a PDC, it was possible to have this. If the ntuser.dat is renamed ntuser.man, and you make the profile owned by root, read-only to the suer, and you set root to have rid 500 in LDAP, does it work? (ie add root to ldap, then change the RID). The SID is stred inside the NTUser.DAT file. Access control (the ACE) is stored inside the file. That is what Rishard Sharpe was working on decoding recently. When his work is done we will be able to set our own ACE's inside the NTUser.DAT file and thus create from any profile a global per group or a global group mandatory profile. Just setting file ownership and permissions does not get one past the hurdle of the ACE inside the file. But if we take a 'normal' profile, change the ownership to admin, but don't change the SIDs, can we use it as a mandatory profile for a single user? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Status of smbtorture 'open' test in HEAD/3.0
I was wondering what the status of the Samba code to support the 'open' smbtorture test is? I remember when you added it, you were going to look at how to support the Win2k behavior in Samba, and I saw some checkins, but we still fail the test on the build farm. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [CHECKER] Potentially very large allocation in malloc (PR#25986)
Full_Name: Russell Greene
Samba_Version: 2.2.6
Server_OS: N/A
Client_OS: N/A
Submission from: (NULL) (128.12.177.14)
This is a potential bug found by a checker. Please verify.
The variable response is read from the socket (thus has the potential to be
tainted) and then is used to compute extra_data_len which is sent to malloc.
Since the value of extra_data_len is not range checked there is a potential
for
very large allocations.
[BUG] The reponse length can be set to something very large causing malloc to
allocate huge memory
/u1/rdg12/net/samba-2.2.6/source/nsswitch/wb_common.c:298:read_reply:
ERROR:USER:292:298:passing needub data (*response).length to malloc
[SECURITY]
[call overflow]
If winbindd wants to send us dud data, it could do far worse than asking us to
do a large malloc(). (Like grant all logins for root with no pw, set all users
to uid = 0...).
Andrew Bartlett
response-extra_data = NULL;
/* Read variable length response */
Start ---
if (response-length sizeof(struct winbindd_response)) {
int extra_data_len = response-length -
sizeof(struct winbindd_response);
/* Mallocate memory for extra data */
Error ---
if (!(response-extra_data = malloc(extra_data_len))) {
return -1;
}
Re: [CHECKER] Direct Deref of tainted pointer sbuf (PR#25987)
Full_Name: Russell Greene
Samba_Version: 2.2.6
Server_OS: N/A
Client_OS: N/A
Submission from: (NULL) (128.12.177.14)
Hello. This potential bug was found using a checker on the Samba source.
Please verify.
I am assuming that sys_fstat is a wrapper for fstat and therefore takes input
from the user. As a result, there is a chance that sbuf will be NULL. The
function sys_fstat dereferences sbuf without first checking that it is not
null.
How can sbuf be NULL?
And what if it is - if you pass a NULL buffer to fstat(), fstat() segfaults, so
I don't see a problem with dereferencing the buffer *after* a successful call to
fstat().
If you can find how we could get a NULL buffer from a caller, this would be a
different issue.
[BUG] assuming user can call sys_fstat
/u1/rdg12/net/samba-2.2.6/source/lib/system.c:204:sys_fstat:
ERROR:USER:196:204:direct deref of tainted pointer sbuf
/***
An fstat() wrapper that will deal with 64 bit filesizes.
/
int sys_fstat(int fd,SMB_STRUCT_STAT *sbuf)
Start ---
{
int ret;
#if defined(HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT) defined(HAVE_OFF64_T)
defined(HAVE_FSTAT64)
ret = fstat64(fd, sbuf);
#else
ret = fstat(fd, sbuf);
#endif
/* we always want directories to appear zero size */
Error ---
if (ret == 0 S_ISDIR(sbuf-st_mode)) sbuf-st_size = 0;
return ret;
}
Re: [PATCH] add 'modules path' and handle 'configure --with-configdir' right
At 11:23 23.11.2002 +1100, Tim Potter wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: here's a patch that added the 'modules path' parameter. lp_modules_path() is prefixed to all lp_modules() witch are not start with '/' (not absolute pathes) the default for lp_modules_path() is selectable by ./configure --with-modulesdir=/modules or $(LIBDIR)/samba (when --with-fhs) or $(LIBDIR) make installmodules install the modules to lp_modules_path() make modules now makes proto_exist Thanks a lot! These were on my todo list.I'll take a look at it later today (when I get back home, I'm currently at school) There's already a directory for architecture specific library files - libexec. We haven't needed to use this so much before so it probably isn't supported in configure.in. How about $(LIBEXECDIR)/modules as a location for the vfs modules? --libexecdir=DIRprogram executables in DIR [EPREFIX/libexec] --libdir=DIRobject code libraries in DIR [EPREFIX/lib] I think modules are object code libaries I would preferr to use LIBDIR/samba , LIBDIR/samba/modules , LIBEXECDIR/samba or LIBEXEC/samba/modules (but I would like one of the first two) I also don't like the valid.dat , upcase.dat, lowcase.dat installed to LIBDIR they should go to LIBDIR/samba/ or CONFIGDIR/ (we should always use the subdir samba, exept BINDIR and SBINDIR) because of that I want to change lib_path() to libsamba_path() and dyn_LIDDIR to dyn_LIBSAMBADIR. Tim. metze - Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared roaming profiles for all users (XP)?
On 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 19:01, John H Terpstra wrote: On 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:46, xfesty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya. Is there anyway to make non changable roaming profiles for all users with XP workstations, and Samba 3.0HEAD from CVS acting as a PDC? I'm setting up a bunch of workstations for an internet cafe, and all users need to basically have the same settings (i.e. desktop icons, Internet Explorer settings, start menu items, etc.) as others, yet not be able to change them. I tried setting the profile dir to the same for all users, and making it read only, but I'm experiencing two problems - (1) XP will refuse to load the profile if its read-only, and (2) XP won't load the profile if it wasn't created by the same user. I'm also finding cookies in IE sometimes aren't being properly set, people can't view hotmail attachments, MSN messenger refuses to work, and a bunch of other oddities. Anyway past this? I remember back when I was using Windows 2K Server as a PDC, it was possible to have this. If the ntuser.dat is renamed ntuser.man, and you make the profile owned by root, read-only to the suer, and you set root to have rid 500 in LDAP, does it work? (ie add root to ldap, then change the RID). The SID is stred inside the NTUser.DAT file. Access control (the ACE) is stored inside the file. That is what Rishard Sharpe was working on decoding recently. When his work is done we will be able to set our own ACE's inside the NTUser.DAT file and thus create from any profile a global per group or a global group mandatory profile. Just setting file ownership and permissions does not get one past the hurdle of the ACE inside the file. But if we take a 'normal' profile, change the ownership to admin, but don't change the SIDs, can we use it as a mandatory profile for a single user? Last attempt to get this across: No! Win NT/2K/XP checks access right on the ACE inside the file as it loads the profile and goes belly up if it does not have access permission for the current user. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared roaming profiles for all users (XP)?
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, John H Terpstra wrote: On 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 19:01, John H Terpstra wrote: On 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:46, xfesty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya. Is there anyway to make non changable roaming profiles for all users with XP workstations, and Samba 3.0HEAD from CVS acting as a PDC? I'm setting up a bunch of workstations for an internet cafe, and all users need to basically have the same settings (i.e. desktop icons, Internet Explorer settings, start menu items, etc.) as others, yet not be able to change them. I tried setting the profile dir to the same for all users, and making it read only, but I'm experiencing two problems - (1) XP will refuse to load the profile if its read-only, and (2) XP won't load the profile if it wasn't created by the same user. I'm also finding cookies in IE sometimes aren't being properly set, people can't view hotmail attachments, MSN messenger refuses to work, and a bunch of other oddities. Anyway past this? I remember back when I was using Windows 2K Server as a PDC, it was possible to have this. If the ntuser.dat is renamed ntuser.man, and you make the profile owned by root, read-only to the suer, and you set root to have rid 500 in LDAP, does it work? (ie add root to ldap, then change the RID). The SID is stred inside the NTUser.DAT file. Access control (the ACE) is stored inside the file. That is what Rishard Sharpe was working on decoding recently. When his work is done we will be able to set our own ACE's inside the NTUser.DAT file and thus create from any profile a global per group or a global group mandatory profile. Just setting file ownership and permissions does not get one past the hurdle of the ACE inside the file. But if we take a 'normal' profile, change the ownership to admin, but don't change the SIDs, can we use it as a mandatory profile for a single user? Last attempt to get this across: No! Win NT/2K/XP checks access right on the ACE inside the file as it loads the profile and goes belly up if it does not have access permission for the current user. That is correct. If you use the profiles command on NTUSER.DAT, it will show you all the ACEs on the profiles. Regards - Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: Samba 2.2.4 Binary Package
Title: RE: Samba 2.2.4 Binary Package Hi Jean, in order to perform a "clean" attempt, I erased completely the directory of my samba installation, removed the samba_startup.com file, removed the tcpip$configuration.dat and did the following: - reconfigured the tcpip - re-linked your distribution - re-installed the distribution No luck, identical result. Here in attachment the output of the commands you suggested me to issue. Pls. let me know. Noone else succeded in installing samba on a microvax 3100 ? - Original Message - From: COLLOT Jean-Yves To: 'Franco Tassone' Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:46 AM Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.4 Binary Package Hi. All this is very surprising to me, especially the VMS crash/reboot, because if the SMBD service is not enabled (as it seems, according to your error message at startup), accessing your VMS machine from a PC does not do anything at all, from the Samba point of vue... Anyway, the point is that the SMBD service does not start, and that this failure can not be caused by anything in your smb.conf file, because this file is not accessed or used in any way at that time. I have the feeling that your SMBD service is not correctly defined, may be because it was defined by a previous SAMBA installation. I suggest to remove it, and redefine it correctly, as follows : $ TCPIP SET NOSERV SMBD $ @SAMBA_ROOT:[BIN]SMBD_SETUP_TCPIP If it fails again, could you send me the results of the following commands : $ TCPIP SHOW DEV $ TCPIP SHOW SERVICE/FULL Regards, J.Y. Collot ---Message d'origine- De: Franco Tassone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: lundi 18 novembre 2002 23:09 À: Josef Rattner Cc: Samba VMS; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wolter.Günter Objet: Re: Samba 2.2.4 Binary Package Hi all I've checked the system logicals, and I can assure that SAMBA_ROOT is defined ok, tried also Wolter advice in using VMS filenaming in smb.conf. No changes, same error during startup, I can't browse the network although I "see" the workgroup defined. If for chance I try to access the VMS samba server for my pc, VMS itself dumps and the system restarts ! BTW, I've not been able to run any samba on this machine (2.0.3 and 2.0.6 ko), though I have samba running on a separate volume in which I've installed netbsd. Any more hints ? Hi, I've downloaded the installation kit for Samba/VMS 2.2.4 and installed it on a mVax3100, running ovms7.2 with compaq tcpip from the same distribution. Obviously I used the precompiled modules for the vax atchitecture, so I had no problems in building and installing the the kit. I've added the SAMBA_STARTUP.COM in my startup command file, unfortunatelly I receive the following error at startup: %TCPIP-E-STARTERROR, error starting SMBD service -RMS-F-DEV, error in device name or inappropriate device type for operation %TCPIP-E-STARTERROR, error starting SMBD service -RMS-F-DEV, error in device name or inappropriate device type for operation The following is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP dead time = 10 map archive = no printing = bsd printcap name = /sys$manager/tcpip$printcap.dat load printers = yes status = yes security = user default service = default create mode = 0777 interfaces = SE0 guest account = SAMBA_GUEST log file = /samba_log/log.%m socket options = TCP_NODELAY share modes = no [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0750 I receive the error at startup either I specify "interfaces = SE0" or not, btw SE0 is the ethernet interface as seen by tcpip. Could you help me please ? Cheers - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Samba VMS" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.4 Binary Package An installation kit for Samba/VMS 2.2.4 is available athttp://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/anonymous/jyc/ checks.log Description: Binary data
CVS update: samba/source/auth
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:27:56 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/auth In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6236/auth Modified Files: auth_domain.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: auth_domain.c 1.65 = 1.66 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/auth/auth_domain.c?r1=1.65r2=1.66
CVS update: samba/source/libads
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:27:56 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libads In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6236/libads Modified Files: ldap.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: ldap.c 1.87 = 1.88 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap.c?r1=1.87r2=1.88
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:27:56 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6236/nsswitch Modified Files: winbindd_cm.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: winbindd_cm.c 1.57 = 1.58 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c?r1=1.57r2=1.58
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:27:56 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6236/utils Modified Files: net_lookup.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: net_lookup.c1.7 = 1.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_lookup.c?r1=1.7r2=1.8
CVS update: samba/source/auth
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:52:34 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/auth In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7969/auth Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 auth_domain.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: auth_domain.c 1.33.2.9 = 1.33.2.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/auth/auth_domain.c?r1=1.33.2.9r2=1.33.2.10
CVS update: samba/source/libads
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:52:34 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libads In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7969/libads Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 ldap.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: ldap.c 1.55.2.8 = 1.55.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap.c?r1=1.55.2.8r2=1.55.2.9
CVS update: samba/source/libsmb
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:52:34 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7969/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 namequery.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: namequery.c 1.93.2.4 = 1.93.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/namequery.c?r1=1.93.2.4r2=1.93.2.5
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:52:34 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7969/nsswitch Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 winbindd_cm.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: winbindd_cm.c 1.31.2.13 = 1.31.2.14 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cm.c?r1=1.31.2.13r2=1.31.2.14
CVS update: samba/source/utils
Date: Sat Nov 23 14:52:34 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/utils In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7969/utils Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 net_lookup.c Log Message: [merge from APP_HEAD] 90% fix for CR 1076. The password server parameter will no take things like password server = DC1 * which means to contact DC1 first and the go to auto lookup if it fails. jerry Revisions: net_lookup.c1.3.2.3 = 1.3.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/utils/net_lookup.c?r1=1.3.2.3r2=1.3.2.4
Re: CVS update: samba/source/torture
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:58:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/torture In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31632/torture Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 cmd_vfs.c Log Message: Please compile with : -g -Wall -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual if you're using gcc. It really does help ! i.e run configure.developer instead of normal configure when building Samba. Tim.
