Re: Compiling error and core dump

2003-01-13 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Yihua Philip Sheng wrote:

 When I tried to compile the new version (2.2.7a) on Sun Solaris 7 and 8
 machine, it gives me the following error:
  
 Using LIBS = -lsec -lgen -lsocket -lnsl  -ldl
 Linking bin/smbd
 /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- E
 usage: ld [-abc:d:e:f:h:il:mo:p:rstu:z:B:D:F:GI:L:M:N:P:Q:R:S:VY:]
 file(s)
 [-a]create an absolute file
 [-b]do not do special PIC relocations in a.out
 [-c file]   record configuration `file'
 [-d y|n]operate in dynamic|static mode
 [-e sym]use `sym' as entry point address
 [-f name]   specify library for which this file is an
 auxiliary filter
 
  
 I then link the /usr/ccs/bin/ld to gnu's ld, it worked. All the binaries
 were generated successfully. But both smbd and nmbd gave core dump when
 I run them. Any suggestion to fix it?

I know this has come up before.  I thought that we correctly detected the 
GNU loader.  It looks like the configure script is using the GNU ld but 
the actual compilation process is using SUN's ld. ANy idea why this
is happening?

From configure.in:
*solaris*) AC_DEFINE(SUNOS5)
BLDSHARED=true
LDSHFLAGS=-G
SONAMEFLAG=-h 
if test ${GCC} = yes; then
PICFLAG=-fPIC
if test ${ac_cv_prog_gnu_ld} = yes; then
DYNEXP=-Wl,-E
fi
else
PICFLAG=-KPIC
## ${CFLAGS} added for building 64-bit shared
## libs using Sun's Compiler
LDSHFLAGS=-G \${CFLAGS}
POBAD_CC=
PICSUFFIX=po.o
fi




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed
 You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there.  
--John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+ItlsIR7qMdg1EfYRAsI+AJ4/9IlvJXUBUMfhfEb840wXfXItrgCfeeql
778KR75bnnUM3D3p12F2Pqc=
=1dbU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Samba] printer suddenly unavailable

2003-01-13 Thread robert . gehr
Hi there

I have a pretty strange problem that pops up once in a while.
Running samba 2.2.7a having installed a Samba machine as password server
sharing user info via NIS I have a couple of printers running here at our
place. Several of them are only accessible to a select group of people so I
defined the concerned printers share as:

[PrinterX]
valid users = user1, user2, user3 
.

Things work fine only once in a while one of the people who is allowed to
print to this share and has done so numerous times in the previous weeks
calls up and says he/she is unable to print. When I check the logs on samba
I get  Rejecting user '': authentication failed 
Reinstalling the printer on the client machine usually helps as well as a
reboot of the concerned client.

This has also happened versy seldom with shares once in a while. Concerned
are W2000, XP and NT machines.

Even though the person can not print anymore he/she can still access
his/her private shares which are bound to proper authentication as well.

Any ideas


Best regards
Robert Gehr

It is an act of evil to accept the state of evil as either inevitable or
final
- Heschel acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, 1986


web2CAD AG
Emailfabrikstrs. 12
92224 Amberg / Germany
visit: http://www.web2cad.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] printer suddenly unavailable

2003-01-13 Thread Hans Scheffers
Maybe the free disk space ?

greetz
Hans
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 09:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi there
 
 I have a pretty strange problem that pops up once in a while.
 Running samba 2.2.7a having installed a Samba machine as password server
 sharing user info via NIS I have a couple of printers running here at our
 place. Several of them are only accessible to a select group of people so I
 defined the concerned printers share as:
 
 [PrinterX]
 valid users = user1, user2, user3 
 .
 
 Things work fine only once in a while one of the people who is allowed to
 print to this share and has done so numerous times in the previous weeks
 calls up and says he/she is unable to print. When I check the logs on samba
 I get  Rejecting user '': authentication failed 
 Reinstalling the printer on the client machine usually helps as well as a
 reboot of the concerned client.
 
 This has also happened versy seldom with shares once in a while. Concerned
 are W2000, XP and NT machines.
 
 Even though the person can not print anymore he/she can still access
 his/her private shares which are bound to proper authentication as well.
 
 Any ideas
 
 
 Best regards
 Robert Gehr
 
 It is an act of evil to accept the state of evil as either inevitable or
 final
 - Heschel acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, 1986
 
 
 web2CAD AG
 Emailfabrikstrs. 12
 92224 Amberg / Germany
 visit: http://www.web2cad.com
-- 
Hans Scheffers 
http://www.jiffie.nl/stamboom/ 

This generation doesn't have emotional baggage.  We have emotional moving
vans.   -- Bruce Feirstein 

Linux Kernel 2.4.18-19 on a i686   -  userid 282784 @ http://counter.li.org

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba 2.2.3a Bug ? Share with msdfs root=yes: NT 4 client can't create directory

2003-01-13 Thread Roland Grzyb
Hi,

we use in the subject mentioned samba 2.2.3a share. All works fine, but NT4 
clients can't create directories (Error: no such file or directory). W2K 
Clients does the work without any problems. Is it a problem of samba, NT or 
a error in our configuration ?

Thanks
Roland Grzyb
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] administrator rights in samba 2.2.7 +ldap + XP

2003-01-13 Thread Christian Daré
Hi ,

My system : debian Woody + samba 2.2.7 + openldap .
We are trying to connect with domain administrators rights on a XP pro client .
After tests , all we obtain is users with domain user rights , impossible to have 
domain administrators rights .

We have define in smb.conf : 

Domain Admin group = @Domain Admins
admin users = administrateur 

And we ve defined administrateur user in ldap so we have :

bash$ id administrateur
bash $: uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root),200(Domain Admins)

First question : is it possible to have a domain admin user with ldap authentication ?
Second question : any idea to find the way out this problem ?

Thanks in advance

-- 
**
Christian Daré  
Pole Universitaire de Quimper   
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Ext3, Lots of Files, Slow performance

2003-01-13 Thread Paul Cochrane
A recent thread has hinted on slow performances on large 
directories (thousands of entries) on the ext2/3 filesystem. I 
appreciate that the answer is to store these directories on a different 
file system or to reorganise the way you store the files into 
subdirectories.

I'd just like to ask has anyone done any tests to determine 
approximately what the limit is before slowdown occurs. I'd guess it's 
maybe dependent on the speed of the CPU, memory and disk 
subsystem but was wondering if anyone has any hard facts.




   -
Paul Cochrane |   Tayside Orthopaedic  |
  | Rehabilitation Technology Centre|
= |-|
  | Ninewells Hospital  Med. School| 
  | Dundee, Scotland, UK.   |
  | DD1 9SY.|
  | Phone:  +44 1382 496284 |
  | Fax:+44 1382 496322 |
  | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
   -

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] general question about samba.

2003-01-13 Thread IAN . HOWE








Hi there,



I'm fairly new to the linux community so excuse my
ignorance.

I've setup a test network with w2k serer and linux rh
8.0.

I'm using kde and trying to configure samba for file
sharing between both.



Is samba already setup by default or do I need to download
the packages?

Is there any decent doc's for this type of setup?



Regards,

Ian














[Samba] Running Samba twice

2003-01-13 Thread tom
Can samba be running twice on a machine so that it can exist on 2 seperate
networks with 2 seperate configs?

I have tried using the -l and -s flags to run it twice and nmbd runs fine
on both interfaces but samba fails with :

[2003/01/13 12:11:33, 0] lib/pidfile.c:pidfile_create(86)
  ERROR: smbd is already running. File /usr/local/samba/var/locks/smbd.pid
exists and process id 23854 is running.

Any help would be greatly appreciated


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] general question about samba.

2003-01-13 Thread Bryan Brannigan



The 
packages are likely installed by default. You can findthe 
documentation at www.samba.org 


  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:01 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] general question 
  about samba.
  
  Hi there,
  
  I'm fairly new to the linux 
  community so excuse my ignorance.
  I've setup a test network with w2k 
  serer and linux rh 8.0.
  I'm using kde and trying to 
  configure samba for file sharing between both.
  
  Is samba already setup by default 
  or do I need to download the packages?
  Is there any decent doc's for this 
  type of setup?
  
  Regards,
  Ian
  
  
  


[Samba] Samba 2.2.7a and cups 1.1.18

2003-01-13 Thread mkrako
Hi

I have installed samba-2.2.7a and cups-1.1.18. After reading all the documentation 
samba
provides as well as the cups administrators guide I am still stuck. I have added the
printers just the way the samba and cups documentation says. Anyway here is my output 
from
cupsaddsmb, It fails on the last step, so i have run that manually again afterwards 
with
debugging enabled.

I believe this to be the offending line:
lsa_io_sec_qos: length c does not match size 8

Google did not have any usefull information.

If you require any more information, let me know.

Regards
Merritt

**
[root@test tar]# cupsaddsmb -H 192.168.0.9 -a -v
Password for root required to access 192.168.0.9 via SAMBA:
Running command: smbclient //192.168.0.9/print\$ -N -U'root%foo' -c 'mkdir W32X86;put
/usr/local/cups/var/spool/cups/tmp/3e22b8a7c1ed7 W32X86/remote.PPD;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS5.DLL W32X86/ADOBEPS5.DLL;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.DLL W32X86/ADOBEPSU.DLL;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.HLP W32X86/ADOBEPSU.HLP'
added interface ip=192.168.0.9 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=192.168.1.69 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Domain=[ALT] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a]
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \W32X86
putting file /usr/local/cups/var/spool/cups/tmp/3e22b8a7c1ed7 as \W32X86/remote.PPD
(12548.7 kb/s) (average 12549.3 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS5.DLL as \W32X86/ADOBEPS5.DLL
(32447.7 kb/s) (average 30106.9 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.DLL as \W32X86/ADOBEPSU.DLL
(31799.4 kb/s) (average 30491.7 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.HLP as \W32X86/ADOBEPSU.HLP
(17539.3 kb/s) (average 29928.6 kb/s)

Running command: rpcclient 192.168.0.9 -N -U'root%foo' -c 'adddriver Windows NT x86
remote:ADOBEPS5.DLL:remote.PPD:ADOBEPSU.DLL:ADOBEPSU.HLP:NULL:RAW:NULL'
cmd = adddriver Windows NT x86
remote:ADOBEPS5.DLL:remote.PPD:ADOBEPSU.DLL:ADOBEPSU.HLP:NULL:RAW:NULL
Printer Driver remote successfully installed.

Running command: smbclient //192.168.0.9/print\$ -N -U'root%foo' -c 'mkdir WIN40;put
/usr/local/cups/var/spool/cups/tmp/3e22b8a7c1ed7 WIN40/remote.PPD;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL;put
/usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL WIN40/PSMON.DLL;'
added interface ip=192.168.0.9 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=192.168.1.69 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Domain=[ALT] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a]
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \WIN40
putting file /usr/local/cups/var/spool/cups/tmp/3e22b8a7c1ed7 as \WIN40/remote.PPD
(12548.7 kb/s) (average 12549.3 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM as \WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM 
(33063.5
kb/s) (average 30904.3 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV
(32447.8 kb/s) (average 31942.2 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP
(31975.4 kb/s) (average 31945.4 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD as \WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD
(13174.5 kb/s) (average 31656.6 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL as \WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL 
(28839.1
kb/s) (average 31493.3 kb/s)
putting file /usr/local/cups/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL as \WIN40/PSMON.DLL (27998.6
kb/s) (average 31394.9 kb/s)

Running command: rpcclient 192.168.0.9 -N -U'root%foo' -c 'adddriver Windows 4.0
remote:ADOBEPS4.DRV:remote.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADOBEPS4.DRV,remote.PPD,ADOBEPS4.HLP,PSMON.DLL,ADFONTS.MFM,DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL'
cmd = adddriver Windows 4.0
remote:ADOBEPS4.DRV:remote.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADOBEPS4.DRV,remote.PPD,ADOBEPS4.HLP,PSMON.DLL,ADFONTS.MFM,DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL
Printer Driver remote successfully installed.

Running command: rpcclient 192.168.0.9 -N -U'root%foo' -c 'setdriver remote remote'
cmd = setdriver remote remote
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL

7**
[root@test cups]# rpcclient 192.168.0.9 -d 3 -N -U'root%foo' -c 'setdriver remote 
remote'
Initialising global parameters
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
Processing section [global]
added interface ip=192.168.0.9 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=192.168.1.69 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Connecting to host=192.168.0.9 share=IPC$
Connecting 

[Samba] (no subject)

2003-01-13 Thread TE
Hi everybody!

Bare with me as I am pretty new to Linux and everything that goes with it. My problem 
consists of copying large files from my w2k client to my samba server. Files larger 
than ca 700 MB will, when moving ore copying to a samba share, stop in a error message 
that the network path is no longer accessible. The “server”, which samba is 
running on, starts to write to the disk but there is no network activity and after a 
while the error message appears. I have looked through all the forums and so on to see 
if I could find an answer, but no. I have however found other users posting messages 
about the same problem, but never an answer that solved the problem. Is there anyone 
who knows how to solve this problem?

Best regards
//
Thomas E


__
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! 
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp 

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] 700 MB to samba share error

2003-01-13 Thread TE
Hi everybody!

I am resending my message, forgot to fill in the subject line. I am sorry.

Bare with me as I am pretty new to Linux and everything that goes with it. My problem 
consists of copying large files from my w2k client to my samba server. Files larger 
than ca 700 MB will, when moving or copying to a samba share, stop in a error message 
that the network path is no longer accessible. The “server”, which samba is 
running on, starts to write to the disk but there is no network activity and after a 
while the error message appears. I have looked through all the forums and so on to see 
if I could find an answer, but no. I have however found other users posting messages 
about the same problem, but never an answer that solved the problem. Is there anyone 
who knows how to solve this problem?

Best regards
//
Thomas E


__
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! 
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp 

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] (no subject)

2003-01-13 Thread Marian Mlcoch, Ing
Hi you must write version off samba,linux and network type you use? Afther x
MB stop?

- Original Message -
From: TE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: [Samba] (no subject)


 Hi everybody!

 Bare with me as I am pretty new to Linux and everything that goes with it.
My problem consists of copying large files from my w2k client to my samba
server. Files larger than ca 700 MB will, when moving ore copying to a samba
share, stop in a error message that the network path is no longer
accessible. The “server”, which samba is running on, starts to write to the
disk but there is no network activity and after a while the error message
appears. I have looked through all the forums and so on to see if I could
find an answer, but no. I have however found other users posting messages
about the same problem, but never an answer that solved the problem. Is
there anyone who knows how to solve this problem?

 Best regards
 //
 Thomas E


 __
 The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp

 Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] (no subject)

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Thomas

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TE)

Bare with me as I am pretty new to Linux and everything that goes with it. My problem 
consists
of copying large files from my w2k client to my samba server. Files larger than ca 
700 MB will,
when moving ore copying to a samba share, stop in a error message that the network 
path is no
longer accessible. The â?oserverâ?, which samba is running on, starts to write to 
the disk but
there is no network activity and after a while the error message appears. I have 
looked through
all the forums and so on to see if I could find an answer, but no. I have however 
found other
users posting messages about the same problem, but never an answer that solved the 
problem.
Is there anyone who knows how to solve this problem?

Is the error message network path is longer accessible or the network path is no 
longer
available? If it's no longer available try this:
Check your Network, maybe dulpex-mode or transfer-rate are not correctly 
autonegotiated.
Try to set those to a fixed value for a client and the server and every managable 
device
(switch) between them.
Try to replace the network-interface-cards (NICs) in the server and the your 
test-client. Try
different hubs/switchs or use a crossover-cable to connect server and client directly 
if possible.

I'm one of those other users who posted about this problem. Later we found a wrong
transfer-speed setting in one of the managable switches. I had contact with around 10 
others
during the last year who had the same error message. All of them who wrote feedback had
bad network-hardware or wrong network-settings. I dont' think that this is a Samba 
problem.

Martin



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Dos To Unix?

2003-01-13 Thread Brendan Flanagan

If we drag a file from a Windows directory - say autoexec.bat and drop it
onto a samba mapped Unix drive, when we then go to the Unix box and vi the
file all the lines end in the DOS EOL character (^M) is there any
option/configuration in samba to make it convert DOS text files to UNIX
format?

Brendan Flanagan
Leyland Trucks Ltd, Croston Road, Leyland, PR26 6LZ
Phone: 01772 625715
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] (no subject)

2003-01-13 Thread TE
Sorry!

The version of samba is 2.2.5 and it is running on SUSE 8.1 with kernel 2.4.19. The 
network is a 100 MB full duplex one, with D-link switch.

To Martin Thomas reply. I will check what the exact error message is as soon as 
possible, that is tomorrow. If it could be hardware related, as you said, could 
possible the file system on the storage disk have an effect?

Thanks for the fast replies
//
Thomas E

Marian Mlcoch, Ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi you must write version off samba,linux and network type you use? Afther x
MB stop?

- Original Message -
From: TE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: [Samba] (no subject)


 Hi everybody!

 Bare with me as I am pretty new to Linux and everything that goes with it.
My problem consists of copying large files from my w2k client to my samba
server. Files larger than ca 700 MB will, when moving ore copying to a samba
share, stop in a error message that the network path is no longer
accessible. The “server”, which samba is running on, starts to write to the
disk but there is no network activity and after a while the error message
appears. I have looked through all the forums and so on to see if I could
find an answer, but no. I have however found other users posting messages
about the same problem, but never an answer that solved the problem. Is
there anyone who knows how to solve this problem?

 Best regards
 //
 Thomas E


 __
 The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp

 Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



__
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! 
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp 

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Exporting samba mount via NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Paul Yeager
Perhaps I'm trying to do something that is not allowed, but I have found 
no such restriction in the documentation.

To limit the contact of my Linux boxes with the products of Bill  
Co., I have mounted a Windows share on my Linux server.  When I try to 
export that same share from the Linux server (as a plain old NFS 
volume), it mounts without error, but the mountpoint appears empty.  The 
configuration looks something like:

Directory on  Mountpoint on -   Mountpoint on
Windows Server Linux Server   Linux Client
  (works fine)   (appears empty)

Am I attempting the impossible, or have I neglected some necessary detail?

Thanks in advance!

Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Exporting samba mount via NFS

2003-01-13 Thread Kurt Weiss


Paul Yeager schrieb:

Perhaps I'm trying to do something that is not allowed, but I have found 
no such restriction in the documentation.

To limit the contact of my Linux boxes with the products of Bill  
Co., I have mounted a Windows share on my Linux server.  When I try to 
export that same share from the Linux server (as a plain old NFS 
volume), it mounts without error, but the mountpoint appears empty.  The 
configuration looks something like:

Directory on  Mountpoint on -   Mountpoint on
Windows Server Linux Server   Linux Client
  (works fine)   (appears empty)

Am I attempting the impossible, or have I neglected some necessary detail?

we are using the same solution, if we change server from windows to 
samba. - the old server is mounted to the new linux box as e.g. oldserver
this is running fine.
seems, that u have problems with userrights (has only root access 
rights?, u need x-rights 4 browsing)
please check the accessrights of the directory and smbclient flags.



Thanks in advance!

Paul




--
mit freundlichen grüssen
==
www.kwnet.at, one step behind future...

Ing. Kurt Weiß
Softwareentwicklung,  EDV Beratung und - Betreuung
A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3
Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:
http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at
===
Die Krise ist ein produktiver Zustand.
Man muss ihr nur den Beigeschmack
der Katastrophe nehmen.

Max Frisch,
Schweizer Dramatiker (1911-1991)
==

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Dos To Unix?

2003-01-13 Thread Harry Rüter
Hi,

 
 If we drag a file from a Windows directory - say autoexec.bat and drop it
 onto a samba mapped Unix drive, when we then go to the Unix box and vi the
 file all the lines end in the DOS EOL character (^M)

Yes, and that's okay, because DOS/Windows needs it this way.
If you convert it to UNIX-style it won't work under DOS/Windows anymore
and you would have to convert it back DOS/Windows-style 

 Is there any option/configuration in samba to make 
 it convert DOS text files to UNIX format?

Don't know, but i'd bet there's none because Samba shall 
IN NO WAY way convert/interpret a file ...
 
I think your problem is not a real samba-problem,
it's (i think) a problem of editing files in two worlds ...
 
 Brendan Flanagan
 Leyland Trucks Ltd, Croston Road, Leyland, PR26 6LZ
 Phone: 01772 625715
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Greets Harry

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging  more  http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Re: samba (2.2.7a) + openldap (2.0.x)

2003-01-13 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, C.Lee Taylor wrote:

 ((uid=machine_)(objectclass=sambaAccount))
 
 where it should have been like this:
 ((uid=machine$)(objectclass=sambaAccount))

   I am sure, but I am sure that I did a Machine Account add with
 2.2.7, is this a change in 2.2.7a ... I don't remember seeing that in
 CVS logs ... but then I have been offline for about a month ...

Nope.  This wouldn't have been a change between 2.2.7 and 2.2.7a.





cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed
 You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there.  
--John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+IuA2IR7qMdg1EfYRAkrXAKCkFLH28JtvIvy1CuFfucvLH1lE8wCcDMAG
u3cfK4txSDgXu7C7lRyP5Kw=
=vJ65
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Dos To Unix?

2003-01-13 Thread Joel Hammer

No, as far as I know.
Joel


On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:05:55PM +0100, Brendan Flanagan wrote:
 
 If we drag a file from a Windows directory - say autoexec.bat and drop it
 onto a samba mapped Unix drive, when we then go to the Unix box and vi the
 file all the lines end in the DOS EOL character (^M) is there any
 option/configuration in samba to make it convert DOS text files to UNIX
 format?
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] I can see the Linux box, but not it's shares.

2003-01-13 Thread Jamie Risk
Hello,
From a W2000 command prompt, using the command net view I can see the list
of all the windows machines and the one Linux Box I've set up with Samba.
Yet when I try net view \\LINUXBOX I get the no-soup-for-you message:
  System error 5 has occurred.
  Access is denied.

I don't remember setting up any password files for this installation of
Samba, and there was no previous installations. Either I missed it in the
documentation or no samba password file is required for simple operation?

The accounts on the linux and windows boxes I'm trying to establish
connections between have the same username and password.

I downloaded the 2.2.7a tar ball, compiled and installed with all the
default parameters on a Core linux distribution without any trouble or
wanring messages.

Next to nothing is running on the Linux machine. At first login, my bash PID
is in the mid 40's. AFAIK no firewall is in operation: though I'd be up for
confirming this.  Information about the basic setup of the Linux box is
here: http://members.rogers.com/riskweb3/Linux/ibm_linux_box_info.html, the
only notable error is that the Linux Box uses a static IP address, outside
the range of the DHCP server.

I can post the log files if any wishes, and here is the smb.conf file:
[global]
netbios name = LINUXBOX
workgroup = WORKGROUP
log level = 2
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log
server string = IBM Box in the server room
security = user

[public]
path = /home/risk
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = no

[risk]
path = /home/risk
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = no

Help?
- Jamie



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Dos To Unix?

2003-01-13 Thread Waider
According to Joel Hammer:
 
 No, as far as I know.
 Joel

Actually, it's probably possible with some futzing with the magic script
paramter, but it'd be pretty specific. 

Cheers,
Waider.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Chances are I'm not at home right now.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Re: I can see the Linux box, but not it's shares.

2003-01-13 Thread Jamie Risk
Examinitation of the log.nmbd file may have turned up something regarding
the lmhosts file. Sorry to clog bandwidth before I persued every option ( I
thought I had).
- Jamie


Jamie Risk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
avuo1b$suh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:avuo1b$suh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello,
 From a W2000 command prompt, using the command net view I can see the
list
 of all the windows machines and the one Linux Box I've set up with Samba.
 Yet when I try net view \\LINUXBOX I get the no-soup-for-you message:
   System error 5 has occurred.
   Access is denied.

 I don't remember setting up any password files for this installation of
 Samba, and there was no previous installations. Either I missed it in the
 documentation or no samba password file is required for simple operation?

 The accounts on the linux and windows boxes I'm trying to establish
 connections between have the same username and password.

 I downloaded the 2.2.7a tar ball, compiled and installed with all the
 default parameters on a Core linux distribution without any trouble or
 wanring messages.

 Next to nothing is running on the Linux machine. At first login, my bash
PID
 is in the mid 40's. AFAIK no firewall is in operation: though I'd be up
for
 confirming this.  Information about the basic setup of the Linux box is
 here: http://members.rogers.com/riskweb3/Linux/ibm_linux_box_info.html,
the
 only notable error is that the Linux Box uses a static IP address, outside
 the range of the DHCP server.

 I can post the log files if any wishes, and here is the smb.conf file:
 [global]
 netbios name = LINUXBOX
 workgroup = WORKGROUP
 log level = 2
 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log
 server string = IBM Box in the server room
 security = user

 [public]
 path = /home/risk
 browseable = yes
 guest ok = yes
 read only = no

 [risk]
 path = /home/risk
 browseable = yes
 guest ok = yes
 read only = no

 Help?
 - Jamie



 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] How can I restart samba?

2003-01-13 Thread Jamie Risk
I'm fiddling with the various configuration files to try and get Samba
working - after making changes to various files I end up rebooting [shudder]
the box to get the settings to take.

I invoke the smbd, and nmbd binaries from a root bash command line, each
with the -D option. I can't seem to send a kill SIGHUP command to the
PID I read from a ps -ex command because I get the message bash: kill:
SIGHUP: no such pid.

Can someone give me a time saving tip?
- Jamie



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Dos To Unix?

2003-01-13 Thread Robert Adkins
Brendan,

Download and utilize the latest version of VIM. (Vi Improved)

I was concerned with that issue myself, as there are a number of logon   
BAT files and such that I either, didn't wish to move back and forth all   
the time to edit, or attempt to continually remember to use the DOS2UNIX   
and UNIX2DOS command that ships with most releases of Linux. (I say move   
back and forth because I am not sharing the netlogon directory.)

Anyway, one day, I just opened up a DOS Bat file with VIM and   
lo-and-behold, the file looked fine. I edited it and then saved it off   
and then opened it up in Windows.

It still looked fine.

Give a go, hopefully it will work fine for you.

Of course, it could also be something added to the Linux distro that I   
am using. I am running Red Hat 7.2, in case you were wondering.

I am certain that you should be able to locate the source code for VIM   
to then compile on whatever UNIX platform that you are using.

Good luck!

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -Original Message-
From: Brendan Flanagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: [Samba] Dos To Unix?

   


If we drag a file from a Windows directory - say autoexec.bat and drop it
onto a samba mapped Unix drive, when we then go to the Unix box and vi   
the
file all the lines end in the DOS EOL character (^M) is there any
option/configuration in samba to make it convert DOS text files to UNIX
format?

Brendan Flanagan
Leyland Trucks Ltd, Croston Road, Leyland, PR26 6LZ
Phone: 01772 625715
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] How can I restart samba?

2003-01-13 Thread Gareth Davies
Jamie Risk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
avupuf$6h6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:avupuf$6h6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I'm fiddling with the various configuration files to try and get Samba
 working - after making changes to various files I end up rebooting
[shudder]
 the box to get the settings to take.

 I invoke the smbd, and nmbd binaries from a root bash command line, each
 with the -D option. I can't seem to send a kill SIGHUP command to the
 PID I read from a ps -ex command because I get the message bash: kill:
 SIGHUP: no such pid.

 Can someone give me a time saving tip?
 - Jamie

ps aux | grep smb

kill -9 PID

ps aux | grep nmb

kill -9 PID

Or just make a script for stop/start/restart :)

Shaolin



*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Retrieveing group membership

2003-01-13 Thread Robert Adkins
Martin,

Is there an issue with using UNIX Group ownership of directories that   
you are sharing amongst the users in those groups?

For instance, let's say that you have a group called administration,   
another called tech and yet another called developers.

Here you have user A, B and C.

In the groups file, this is what you would need...

administration:x:901:A,C (Where A,B and C are the user names)
tech:x:910:A,B,C
developers:x:915:B,C

Let's now say that you have some folders labeled; administration, tech   
and developers. These folders are then shared with the same names through   
Samba...

So, you set the group ownerships of those files to the groups you   
created in the UNIX Groups file... Then you will also need to change the   
rights to include an g+s, which would make all newly created files and   
sub-folders to be owned by the same group as the main folder/share.

You do far more interesting and complicated nested shares and other   
things that I unfortunately don't have the time to explain...

The really nice thing about Samba is that you are using not only the   
Samba permissions but also the underlying UNIX file system permissions as   
well.

If you need something clarified, respond to all and if I am able to I   
will attempt to find time to answer the questions, if not I am certain   
someone else will be able to answer them as well.

Good luck!

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -Original Message-
From: Martin Peter Hanke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: [Samba] Retrieveing group memberships

   

Hi,

is there a possibility to include smb_{grp}.confs depending on the group
membership of the user? What I figured out is I can retrieve the primary
group of a user but what if a user is member of several groups let's say:

user a is member of tech and administration (not domain admin!!)
user b is member of dev and tech
user c is member of all existing smb groups

I would like to include all smb_{grp}.conf for the user. %G gives me the
primary group, how do I access the other memberships?

I had a couple of other hints how to solve the problem but, maybe it was
the way I tried to approach the problem, non was satisfying.

Greets,

Martin


==
I. Thessalonians 4:16
 Thanks, Dad, for just letting me be a nerd.

We don't stop playing because we grow older,
We grow older because we stop playing.

Being paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you.

Important Information:
This is best viewed with Netscape Explorer 21.5,
at 3200x1800 pixels with 8xFSAA, 48bit color,
27 TFT (16x9), and a nail in the knee.
==

 --
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Please help! Updated to Redhat 8.0, now can't getsamba to work

2003-01-13 Thread A. Rosina Bignall
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 23:18, naugaranch wrote:
 A couple of questions,
 
 Did you re-establish user passwords in Samba?
 Why do you have the smb.conf line
 
   deny hosts = ALL

So that when I have my internet connection up, other hosts out there
cannot connect to my machine, only the ones on my local net. The next
line that says hosts allow ... lets in the machines on my local net. Am
I misunderstanding this? At any rate, this is exactly how I had it
before I upgraded and it worked.

 
 Seems like this would reject all connections.
 
 Is the firewall running (IPCHAINS  IPTABLES).  If so, have you set it up
 properly?
 

Hmm... I think so, but I haven't done much with the firewall since I
installed, just left it with the defaults.  Let me open it up wide and
see what happens...

Oh yes! That worked.  Thank you very much! I should have thought about
the firewall. I set eth0 to be a trusted device and the security level
at High, so I should be pretty well set now.

Thanks again.

Rosina



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] smbclient/smbmount authentication methods

2003-01-13 Thread Antti Tikkanen
Hello,

Sorry if this is a well-documented thing, but I was not able to find clear
answers on this.

What authentication methods are smbclient and smbmount able to use? I am
trying to connect to a Windows 2000 file server, and from the packet dumps
I am able to see that the protocol dialect is NT LM 0.12. Is the
authentication done with LM, NTLM or NTLMv2? How can I tell the
difference?

I tried setting from the registry of the W2k server the
LMCompatibilityLevel to 5. After this, I could not connect with either
smbclient or smbmount. This would seem to say that NTLMv2 is not
supported?

(I have tried the Kerberos authentication support for smbclient, which is
a really nice feature and works fine!)

Any information would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,
Antti Tikkanen


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helsinki University of Technology
Computing Centre

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] W2K CALS AND SAMBA

2003-01-13 Thread John Paciotti

Do I take a CAL of any type when using a samba client to connect to a w2k
file server or view the shares on a w2k file server ?

John Paciotti
CompuData Inc.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] I can see the Linux box, but not it's shares.

2003-01-13 Thread WONG_Jeffrey

Have you defined a guest user in smb.conf and Linux passwd file ?

Jeffrey







Jamie Risk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé par : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13/01/2003 06:05
Veuillez répondre à Jamie Risk


Pour :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :
Objet :[Samba] I can see the Linux box, but not it's shares.


Hello,
>From a W2000 command prompt, using the command net view I can see the list
of all the windows machines and the one Linux Box I've set up with Samba.
Yet when I try net view \\LINUXBOX I get the no-soup-for-you message:
 System error 5 has occurred.
 Access is denied.

I don't remember setting up any password files for this installation of
Samba, and there was no previous installations. Either I missed it in the
documentation or no samba password file is required for simple operation?

The accounts on the linux and windows boxes I'm trying to establish
connections between have the same username and password.

I downloaded the 2.2.7a tar ball, compiled and installed with all the
default parameters on a Core linux distribution without any trouble or
wanring messages.

Next to nothing is running on the Linux machine. At first login, my bash PID
is in the mid 40's. AFAIK no firewall is in operation: though I'd be up for
confirming this. Information about the basic setup of the Linux box is
here: http://members.rogers.com/riskweb3/Linux/ibm_linux_box_info.html, the
only notable error is that the Linux Box uses a static IP address, outside
the range of the DHCP server.

I can post the log files if any wishes, and here is the smb.conf file:
[global]
netbios name = LINUXBOX
workgroup = WORKGROUP
log level = 2
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log
server string = IBM Box in the server room
security = user

[public]
path = /home/risk
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = no

[risk]
path = /home/risk
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = no

Help?
- Jamie



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




[Samba] Windows vs. samba print server comparisons

2003-01-13 Thread daniel . jarboe
Is anyone aware or have collected any reviews/studies/thoughts/etc
weighing pros and cons of windows print servers vs. samba print servers
on linux/unix?  Windows clients.  I am more interested in performance
comparisons and what features work better or worse, or not at all,
rather than the licensing/cost/support issues.

Thanks for any feedback,
~ Daniel









 

---

This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be
legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use
of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or
otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be
viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information
herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.
Thank you.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 on Red Hat 8.0 and Windows 2000

2003-01-13 Thread A. Rosina Bignall

Yes, it sounds like the same problem I had as well.  Try opening up your
firewall completely.  Once you get samba working, set up the firewall
again.  I set mine up so that my ethernet connection (device eth0) is
trusted.  Redhat has made it easy for basic configuration of the
firewall using the Security Level editor (from the System Settings
submenu if you use the standard setup Redhat ships or
redhat-config-securitylevel).  Using that tool, set the Security Level
to No firewall verify that samba is working as expected, then figure
out what you want your firewall to be set at.  Mine is set at High,
then I customize so that eth0 is a trusted device.  Alternatively, you
could allow incoming to the port samba uses, but I haven't tried that --
given that I just have two machines that only I use, trusting eth0 is
good enough for me ;).

Rosina

On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 23:18, naugaranch wrote:
 Jose,
 
 Sounds like the same problem I had.  And related to the firewall on the RH8
 box (particularly if its built as a server).  Try stopping IPChains and
 IPTables in the services.  If you can access the RH8 shares after doing
 this - you need help getting the firewall set up (something I have not done
 here and also need to learn).
 
 Tom Winfield
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Jose Medrano
   Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:27 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 on Red Hat 8.0 and Windows 2000
 
 
   I'm traying to access my Red Hat 8.0 box from windows 2000 professional.
 I'm using samba 2.2.7a and I can see the linux box on the windows 2000
 network , but when I click on it I get the message 'System error 53 can't
 find the netwok path... can some one help me please
   I don't have any problem accessing the windows 2000 box
   from my linux server.
   I tried both DHCP and fixed IP address and I get the same
   results.  I use 'support Wins' on my smb.conf and the linux server IP as
 my wins server on the windows 2000.
 
 
 
 


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request

2003-01-13 Thread toby bluhm
Hello,

I've been running samba 2.0.7 for a couple years now on a DEC alpha with 
Tru64 4.0D. I't pertty much a default smb.conf as far as oplocks  that 
sort of stuff.

Anyway, the other day some users started having troubles with saving 
ms-word files. The smbd processes have always been running as root. But 
now the users with the problem own their smbd process. And they get 
errors like such in the log file:

  for dev = 810, inode = 17169, tv_sec = 3e22d418, tv_usec = 931fe
[2003/01/13 12:46:27, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1204)
  request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to 
pid 5755 on port 1450 for dev = 810, inode = 144022
  for dev = 810, inode = 144022, tv_sec = 3e22dc57, tv_usec = d9670
[2003/01/13 12:46:30, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1204)
  request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to 
pid 4265 on port 1395 for dev = 810, inode = 17312
  for dev = 810, inode = 17312, tv_sec = 3e22d418, tv_usec = 887d2
[2003/01/13 12:46:30, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1204)
  request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to 
pid 5755 on port 1450 for dev = 810, inode = 144022
  for dev = 810, inode = 144022, tv_sec = 3e22dc57, tv_usec = d9670


It seems since some of the smbd processes is owned by root, the process 
owned by the users cannot control the root owned process. Is this a 
correct assumption? How or why would it start doing this? And the user 
will have several smbd processes started in their name. Seems to be only 
NT4 clients, although I've not verified that yet.

The only recent change I made was the IP address of the server. The 
client have had their new IPs for some time now. I'm not tying samba to 
any specific interface or IP.

ANy clues as to how to fix this?


Thanks


-tkb

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] W2K CALS AND SAMBA

2003-01-13 Thread Robert Adkins
John,

If I understand what MS describes a CAL to be, then ANY machine that   
connects to the W2K file server (for file/print access) is considered a   
Client that requires a CAL. This would (I believe) also be the case if   
you setup the W2K fileserver to allow FTP access and you used FTP to   
connect to it from that Linux/UNIX Samba running system you wish to have   
browse the W2K system.

If CALs are getting you down, take a look at using Samba as a PDC and   
get rid of those silly CALs. I did so here and while there were a few   
minor hiccups, we are running quite smoothly and I can swear that file   
transfer times are WAY up. (I never calculated the time difference, I   
just don't have the time.)

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -Original Message-
From: John Paciotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: [Samba] W2K CALS AND SAMBA

   


Do I take a CAL of any type when using a samba client to connect to a w2k
file server or view the shares on a w2k file server ?

John Paciotti
CompuData Inc.
 --
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Running Samba twice

2003-01-13 Thread tom
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote:

 You must set path to pid files in your confs diferent.See conf help to do.

Thankyou very much.

Still doesn't work tho.

Now I get

 bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0
 Error = Address already in use.

It sholdn'#t be trying to bind to 0.0.0.0

Am I missing something?


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Force the user to change its password

2003-01-13 Thread Raffaele Sandrini
Hi

I successfully set up a PDC using samba 2.2. It really works perfect!

I'd like to force all users to change their paswords on their first login. Is 
that possible? (On a M$ PDC this would be a special flag wich u have to 
activate)

cheers,
Raffaele
-- 
Raffaele Sandrini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Annoyed about M$ Windows? Don't worry. Try Linux! (www.linux.org)
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Running Samba twice

2003-01-13 Thread Gerd-Christian Michalke
On Montag, 13. Januar 2003 19:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote:
  You must set path to pid files in your confs diferent.See conf help to
  do.

 Thankyou very much.

 Still doesn't work tho.

 Now I get

  bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0
  Error = Address already in use.

 It sholdn'#t be trying to bind to 0.0.0.0

 Am I missing something?

Here some tips which might help you further :


- you must start twice the daemons, but under different names (say, you'd make 
a copy of smbd and call them smbd1 and smbd2)
- those copies should also use different smb.conf files, in which you would 
define different interfaces and bind interface only parameters
- also define different pids and different log directories in those two 
smb.conf
- also, you need two different IP adresses, which you may use IP aliases

It's just an idea, but it might help

Kind regards,
Gerd

-- 
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]\\_//
 (. .)   Powered by SuSE Linux 8.1   
---oOOo-oOOo--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] request_oplock_break: no response received to oplockbreak request

2003-01-13 Thread Rashkae
Nope, this has nothing to do with user owned processes.  What this does,
mean, however, is that the users are trying to share the files with
multiple computers with oplocks enabled.  You should search this mailing
list archive for discussions ad-nauseum about oplocks.


Jan 13  1:56pm


They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.
  --English folk poem, circa 1764








On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, toby bluhm wrote:

Hello,

I've been running samba 2.0.7 for a couple years now on a DEC alpha with
Tru64 4.0D. I't pertty much a default smb.conf as far as oplocks  that
sort of stuff.

Anyway, the other day some users started having troubles with saving
ms-word files. The smbd processes have always been running as root. But
now the users with the problem own their smbd process. And they get
errors like such in the log file:

   for dev = 810, inode = 17169, tv_sec = 3e22d418, tv_usec = 931fe
[2003/01/13 12:46:27, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1204)
   request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to
pid 5755 on port 1450 for dev = 810, inode = 144022
   for dev = 810, inode = 144022, tv_sec = 3e22dc57, tv_usec = d9670
[2003/01/13 12:46:30, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1204)
   request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to
pid 4265 on port 1395 for dev = 810, inode = 17312
   for dev = 810, inode = 17312, tv_sec = 3e22d418, tv_usec = 887d2
[2003/01/13 12:46:30, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1204)
   request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to
pid 5755 on port 1450 for dev = 810, inode = 144022
   for dev = 810, inode = 144022, tv_sec = 3e22dc57, tv_usec = d9670


It seems since some of the smbd processes is owned by root, the process
owned by the users cannot control the root owned process. Is this a
correct assumption? How or why would it start doing this? And the user
will have several smbd processes started in their name. Seems to be only
NT4 clients, although I've not verified that yet.

The only recent change I made was the IP address of the server. The
client have had their new IPs for some time now. I'm not tying samba to
any specific interface or IP.

ANy clues as to how to fix this?


Thanks


-tkb

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] mapping usernames between Windows and Linux

2003-01-13 Thread Steve Blackwell
My username is different on my Linux box than on my Windows box so I used 
the line

username map = /etc/samba/smbusers

in my smb.conf file and this file includes the line

steve = steveb

However when I'm logged on to my Linux box as 'steve' and use the 
smbclient command like this:

# smbclient //Windows computer/Shared
...
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

it still tries to log me on with my Linux username. I checked this using 
Ethereal. The environment variables $USER and $LOGNAME are both set to 
'steve'.

# smbclient //Windows computer/Shared -U steveb%my password

works OK. Can someone tell me how to do this mapping correctly?

I'm using samba-2.2.7-2 on a RH8.0 box.

Thanks,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Running Samba twice

2003-01-13 Thread mark
On Monday 13 January 2003 18:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wrote:
  You must set path to pid files in your confs diferent.See conf help to
  do.

 Thankyou very much.

 Still doesn't work tho.

 Now I get

  bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0
  Error = Address already in use.

 It sholdn'#t be trying to bind to 0.0.0.0

 Am I missing something?
This has been covered a couple of times on this list.  You should really 
search the archives.   

You will need to setup a virtual ip address, and bind each instance an 
individual address to start.  man smbd, nmbd to figure out which options 
you'll need to give to the daemons.  or check the archives.  

mark

ps  you could always check the archives... :)


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] mapping usernames between Windows and Linux

2003-01-13 Thread Frank Matthieß
At 10.01.2003 on 22:47 CET  +0100, wrote Steve Blackwell:
 My username is different on my Linux box than on my Windows box so I used 
 the line
 
 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
 
 in my smb.conf file and this file includes the line
 
 steve = steveb

Unixname = smbname

You have to login as steven, which samba maps to unixuser steve.

 
 However when I'm logged on to my Linux box as 'steve' and use the 
 smbclient command like this:
 
 # smbclient //Windows computer/Shared
 ...
 session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

Sure, because smblient tries with steve and not steveb
If there is no steve user in smbpasswd, this must fail.

 
 it still tries to log me on with my Linux username. I checked this using 
 Ethereal. The environment variables $USER and $LOGNAME are both set to 
 'steve'.
 
 # smbclient //Windows computer/Shared -U steveb%my password

Here you told smbclient explicit tu use your correct username, so it
runs.

With regards 
Frank Matthieß.
-- 
Frank Matthieß[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Running Samba twice

2003-01-13 Thread Eric Boehm
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:50:31PM +0100, Gerd-Christian Michalke wrote:
 Marian == Marian Mlcoch, Ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Tom == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Gerd == Gerd-Christian Michalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Marian You must set path to pid files in your confs diferent.See
Marian conf help to do.

Tom Thankyou very much.

Tom Still doesn't work tho.

Tom Now I get

Tom bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0 Error = Address
Tom already in use.

Tom It sholdn'#t be trying to bind to 0.0.0.0

Tom Am I missing something?

Gerd Here some tips which might help you further :

Gerd - you must start twice the daemons, but under different
Gerd names (say, you'd make a copy of smbd and call them smbd1
Gerd and smbd2) - those copies should also use different smb.conf
Gerd files, in which you would define different interfaces and
Gerd bind interface only parameters - also define different pids
Gerd and different log directories in those two smb.conf - also,
Gerd you need two different IP adresses, which you may use IP
Gerd aliases

I posted detailed instructions on how to run multiple smbd/nmbd
daemons (almost a year ago). You might take a look at:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10130473722r=1w=2

-- 
Eric M. Boehm  /\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ /  No HTML or RTF in mail
X   No proprietary word-processing
Respect Open Standards / \  files in mail
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Deleting non empty directories

2003-01-13 Thread Sutto Zoltan



Hi!


Why I can not able to delete non empty directories 
from WIndows clients/smbclient?
Is there any solution to this or is ita 
bug/non supported functionin samba?


Any suggestion would be appreciated.

Thanks 

Zoltan Sutto




[Samba] Exporting a samba mount]

2003-01-13 Thread Paul Yeager
Anyone have experience with exporting to other Linux boxes a Windows 
share mounted on one Linux box?

I have successfully mounted the Windows share on the Linux server box, 
but when I edit /etc/exports to include the new mount and run exportfs, 
I get error messages regarding the new export.  For example, if I add 
this line to /etc/exports:

/mnt/windows_sharesomebox(rw)

I will get the following error when running exportfs:

somebox:/mnt/windows_share: Invalid argument

I do have other NFS exports from native local filesystems working just fine!

Thanks in advance!

Paul




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] MSDFS Share can't create directory from NT 4 SP6a Client

2003-01-13 Thread Shirish Kalele
Hi,

Please upgrade to the latest version of Samba 2.2.x. I think this was
fixed in 2.2.4.

Regards,
Shirish

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Is anyone using Netsaint/Nagios to monitor SAMBA?

2003-01-13 Thread Mike . Hall

Hello all,
Is anyone using Netsaint?Nagios to monitor SAMBA? If so, I would like more information on how you are doing this.

Thanks,

Mike Hall

Re: [Samba] auto start

2003-01-13 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 07:41, Roland Thompson wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm fairly new to both linux and samba.
 I'm running RH8 with Samba 2.2.7a.
 Samba's installed and is basically working, but can anyone tell me how I
 can get samba to start when linux boots up?
 I'm currently having to start it by running the following commands;
 ./usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D
 ./usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd -D
 
 I've got the Using samba book from o'reilly, but it doesn't tell you how
 to set conf xinetd
 
 Thx in advance
 
 Roland

You should be able to run serviceconf and put a tick next to the
service you want to run - but Samba SHOULD be running by default. Either
which, running serviceconf and then doing a save will ensure that
it's starting at bootup - if it isn't already.

Another thing to do is when it dies or if you want to restart it, is to
open a term and run:

service smb --full-restart

Cheers! HTH
-- 
Tue Jan 14 07:45:00 EST 2003
  7:45am  up 1 day,  9:31,  5 users,  load average: 1.52, 0.56, 0.33
--
|____  | kuhn media australia|
|   / ,, /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |=|
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  |/ ._/  || |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808 |
|  ;/ / | | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389|
|  '  `-`'   | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
--
* linux user:267497 * RH 7.3+ * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
--

A lie in time saves nine.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] auto start

2003-01-13 Thread Roland Thompson
Thanks for the reply, but smb isn't one of the options.
Any idea on how I can get it there?

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Kint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 13 January 2003 20:46
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Samba] auto start

Easiest way to do it is set it to start in your service menu.
As root, run setup and go to the services option, the put a check mark
on
smb.

-Original Message-
From: Roland Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] auto start


Hi,

I'm fairly new to both linux and samba.
I'm running RH8 with Samba 2.2.7a.
Samba's installed and is basically working, but can anyone tell me how I
can get samba to start when linux boots up?
I'm currently having to start it by running the following commands;
./usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D
./usr/local/samba/sbin/nmbd -D

I've got the Using samba book from o'reilly, but it doesn't tell you how
to set conf xinetd

Thx in advance

Roland

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] auto start

2003-01-13 Thread Gordon Pritchard
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 12:41, Roland Thompson wrote:

 I'm running RH8 with Samba 2.2.7a.
 how I can get samba to start when linux boots up?

Here are three ways:

1)  if using Gnome as your desktop, click on the 'foot' - Programs -
System - Service Configuration.  You will be prompted for the root
password, if you are not already  root.  Go down through the list, put a
check next to 'smb'.  For me, nmbd starts automatically as a consquence
of smb starting.

2)  from a console, you can type 'serviceconf'.  This basically does
exactly the same as option 1).

3)  from a console (or, in case you have no GUI), you type 'ntsysv'. 
Again, this gives you a list of services and checkboxes; tick off 'smb'.

HTH,
-Gord

-- 
Gordon Pritchard, P.Eng. | Institute of Electrical and
Research Labs Manager|  Electronics Engineers
Simon Fraser University, Surrey  | Quarter Century Wireless Ass'n
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Telephone Pioneers of America
phone:  604.586.6186

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] How can I restart samba?

2003-01-13 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:37:54AM -0500, Jamie Risk wrote:
 I invoke the smbd, and nmbd binaries from a root bash command line, each
 with the -D option. I can't seem to send a kill SIGHUP command to the
 PID I read from a ps -ex command because I get the message bash: kill:
 SIGHUP: no such pid.

kill SIGHUP pid is the wrong syntax. You want kill -HUP pid. Or
you can just wait a few minutes, current versions of Samba are supposed
to check the config file for changes.

All UNIX signal names are SIGname, to send them to a process by
signal name you use kill -name pid, without the SIG.

-- 
Michael Heironimus
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] auto start

2003-01-13 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 3)  from a console (or, in case you have no GUI), you type 'ntsysv'. 
 Again, this gives you a list of services and checkboxes; tick off 'smb'.

And perhaps the best way, since it's the (current) Red Hat preferred
method:

open a console/root terminal and enter
 chkconfig smb on
 service smb start

chkconfig --list smb will show you the current status of Samba in
terms of which run levels it runs in. Practially speaking, chkconfig
smb on will switch it on for the levels that matter.

Cheers,
Waider.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
One or more sentences in this post have been over-leavened with
 sarcasm and/or irony. The author fully expects to be misunderstood
 because of this, you illiterate morons. He doesn't care. - AjD
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] auto start

2003-01-13 Thread Gordon Pritchard
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 12:52, Roland Thompson wrote:

 Thanks for the reply, but smb isn't one of the options.
 Any idea on how I can get it there?

If you installed RedHat's samba rpm, everything should be set to
go...???

If you downloaded and compiled stuff, then I can see this happening. 
What you need is a file - /etc/initd.d/samba  I'm including mine as a
reference for you (also RH 8; short, and ASCII).

Begin included samba init
#!/bin/sh
#
# chkconfig: 345 91 35
# description: Starts and stops the Samba smbd and nmbd daemons \
#  used to provide SMB network services.

# Source function library.
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions

# Source networking configuration.
. /etc/sysconfig/network

# Check that networking is up.
[ ${NETWORKING} = no ]  exit 0

CONFIG=/etc/samba/smb.conf

# Check that smb.conf exists.
[ -f $CONFIG ] || exit 0

# See how we were called.
case $1 in
  start)
echo -n Starting SMB services: 
daemon smbd -D  
daemon nmbd -D 
echo
touch /var/lock/subsys/smb
;;
  stop)
echo -n Shutting down SMB services: 

## we have to get all the smbd process here instead of just the
## main parent (i.e. killproc) because it can take a long time
## for an individual process to process a TERM signal
smbdpids=`ps guax | grep smbd | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'`
for pid in $smbdpids; do
kill -TERM $pid
done
## nmbd is ok to kill using killproc()
killproc nmbd -TERM
rm -f /var/lock/subsys/smb
echo 
;;
  status)
status smbd
status nmbd
;;
  restart)
echo -n Restarting SMB services: 
$0 stop
$0 start
echo done.
;;
  *)
echo Usage: smb {start|stop|restart|status}
exit 1
esac

 End Included Text 

-- 
Gordon Pritchard, P.Eng. | Institute of Electrical and
Research Labs Manager|  Electronics Engineers
Simon Fraser University, Surrey  | Quarter Century Wireless Ass'n
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Telephone Pioneers of America
phone:  604.586.6186

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] auto start

2003-01-13 Thread Roland Thompson
I did download and compile it, now looking at your config file actually
makes the book make sense.

Thank you


-Original Message-
From: Gordon Pritchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 13 January 2003 21:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Kevin Kint'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] auto start

On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 12:52, Roland Thompson wrote:

 Thanks for the reply, but smb isn't one of the options.
 Any idea on how I can get it there?

If you installed RedHat's samba rpm, everything should be set to
go...???

If you downloaded and compiled stuff, then I can see this
happening. 
What you need is a file - /etc/initd.d/samba  I'm including mine as a
reference for you (also RH 8; short, and ASCII).

Begin included samba init
#!/bin/sh
#
# chkconfig: 345 91 35
# description: Starts and stops the Samba smbd and nmbd daemons \
#  used to provide SMB network services.

# Source function library.
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions

# Source networking configuration.
. /etc/sysconfig/network

# Check that networking is up.
[ ${NETWORKING} = no ]  exit 0

CONFIG=/etc/samba/smb.conf

# Check that smb.conf exists.
[ -f $CONFIG ] || exit 0

# See how we were called.
case $1 in
  start)
echo -n Starting SMB services: 
daemon smbd -D  
daemon nmbd -D 
echo
touch /var/lock/subsys/smb
;;
  stop)
echo -n Shutting down SMB services: 

## we have to get all the smbd process here instead of just the
## main parent (i.e. killproc) because it can take a long time
## for an individual process to process a TERM signal
smbdpids=`ps guax | grep smbd | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'`
for pid in $smbdpids; do
kill -TERM $pid
done
## nmbd is ok to kill using killproc()
killproc nmbd -TERM
rm -f /var/lock/subsys/smb
echo 
;;
  status)
status smbd
status nmbd
;;
  restart)
echo -n Restarting SMB services: 
$0 stop
$0 start
echo done.
;;
  *)
echo Usage: smb {start|stop|restart|status}
exit 1
esac

 End Included Text 

-- 
Gordon Pritchard, P.Eng. | Institute of Electrical and
Research Labs Manager|  Electronics Engineers
Simon Fraser University, Surrey  | Quarter Century Wireless Ass'n
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Telephone Pioneers of America
phone:  604.586.6186


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Which filesystem to increase Samba performances ?

2003-01-13 Thread Jean-Charles Preaux
hello,
i'm a new suscriber of this mailing-list, hoping i'll be able to help u.
But before i've a question.
I've to mount a huge file server using Samba.
We bought a new server, using raid 5 technology.
My question is, now i've to install on it my favorite operating system :)
and i ask me which filesystem type i've to use to increase Samba performances on it, 
some people said me xfs, others ext3...
Which one do u recommend me and why ?
hoping i've been clear with my question.
thanks.


-- 
Jean-Charles Preaux

(o_
//\
V_/_ Debian GNU/Linux user.

E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Exporting a samba mount]

2003-01-13 Thread Barry, Christopher
I am doing this without error. The only thing I can think of - and do not know if this 
matters - do you have smbfs compiled into the kernel of the linux server trying to 
export the share?

-C

-Original Message-
From: Paul Yeager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Exporting a samba mount]


Anyone have experience with exporting to other Linux boxes a Windows 
share mounted on one Linux box?

I have successfully mounted the Windows share on the Linux server box, 
but when I edit /etc/exports to include the new mount and run exportfs, 
I get error messages regarding the new export.  For example, if I add 
this line to /etc/exports:

/mnt/windows_sharesomebox(rw)

I will get the following error when running exportfs:

somebox:/mnt/windows_share: Invalid argument

I do have other NFS exports from native local filesystems working just fine!

Thanks in advance!

Paul




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] mapping usernames between Windows and Linux

2003-01-13 Thread Barry, Christopher
You are doing it right. It maps the variable %U (the name samba gets from you on your 
windows box when you connect) to the UNIX name you specify. NT is the one having the 
problem, as it is getting your UNIX username. This is expected behavior.

-C

-Original Message-
From: Steve Blackwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] mapping usernames between Windows and Linux


My username is different on my Linux box than on my Windows box so I used 
the line

username map = /etc/samba/smbusers

in my smb.conf file and this file includes the line

steve = steveb

However when I'm logged on to my Linux box as 'steve' and use the 
smbclient command like this:

# smbclient //Windows computer/Shared
...
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

it still tries to log me on with my Linux username. I checked this using 
Ethereal. The environment variables $USER and $LOGNAME are both set to 
'steve'.

# smbclient //Windows computer/Shared -U steveb%my password

works OK. Can someone tell me how to do this mapping correctly?

I'm using samba-2.2.7-2 on a RH8.0 box.

Thanks,
Steve.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] pam_smbpass Guidance

2003-01-13 Thread Ryan Novosielski
I am looking to move to encrypted passwords -- pam_smbpass looks like a
very attractive option to me. However, here is my problem: the way a user
FIRST logs in, 90% of the time, is in the lab, through a Win98 and Samba
machine. Therefore, the user MUST be able to login with their new
account/password (or for that matter, existing user account/password
pre-migration) to Samba first. Our account creating procedure is the
following:

1) Account is created
2) User comes to support and checks to see if account is ready
3) User changes password (from privileged account at support desk, akin to
sudo)
4) User walks away and typically goes to try their account on lab PC's, or
if not that time, at least will log in for his/her first time to a lab PC

...my assumption is that in this case, the password change will take care
of the creation/password changing of the smbpasswd entry. However, what
about accounts that are in our /etc/passwd already? Does pam_smbpass
update passwords in smbpasswd WITHOUT encrypted passwords turned on
(something akin to 'update encrypted'), or must I turn encryption on
FIRST, thus making it impossible for any user to log onto a lab PC (and
therefore not allowing them to access any other means of logging into the
machine?)

Also, one final question... the pam.conf entries:

auth optional /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so migrate

...and...

password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so use_authok try_first_pass
/ migrate

...do these only affect first logins, or does this mean any user who
properly authenticates on our machines (via telnet, ssh) will have their
password synced with smbpasswd?

BASICALLY, to sum up... this is what I would /like/ to have happen, and
maybe someone can tell me how close I can come to the ideal:

1) Compile/install Samba (Samba is currently running, but an update to
2.2.7a is in order anyway) and modify pam.conf (HP-UX) to include the
above modules
2) Wait awhile for users to login through all services -- as many as
possible (can a sync be triggered by, for example and imapd or pop3d
login? many of our users don't bother with interactive logins), INCLUDING
Samba while encrypted passwords are turned off.
3) When it appears as if enough users have logged in (so that we are not
bombarded with users that cannot do Samba logins in the lab and will need
assistance from staff), flip the switch as it were to start using
encrypted passwords.

Is all of that possible?

 _  _ _  _ ___  _  _  _
|Y#| |  | |\/| |  \ |\ |  |  | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$| |__| |  | |__/ | \| _|  | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - New Jersey Medical School - C630
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Exchange data with NT Wins server

2003-01-13 Thread Barry, Christopher
Mr. Beast,
Do you need this functionality from everywhere, or just from your admin workstation? 
You might try adding the wins server IP of the remote subnet to your advanced TCPIP 
options on the NIC in windows to see if that helps.

Let me know how it goes.

-C

-Original Message-
From: Beast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:15 AM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Exchange data with NT Wins server


At 10:30 AM 1/12/2003 -0500, Christopher Barry wrote:
research these parameters:
   remote announce
   remote browse sync

Thanks. 
but both options seems only provide browsing list to another subnet, not
nbname-to-ip.

With nt-wins to nt-wins replication, on win client, i can ping using
netbios name (even if machine is on separate subnet and not listed in dns).

ps:
This list style keep breaking my mail filter and hard to reply. 
admin, pls add reply-to header :-)


HTH
-C



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] help

2003-01-13 Thread Mark Ryan
I am running Redhat 8.0.  I have it networked with winxp.  I was using
samba successfully until today.  I installed a new harddrive, cpu, and
motherboard into the linux box.  I transferred files as normal for a
while but now im getting errors when I transfer.  I get a 'path to deep'
error now when I try to transfer files in the following methods:
 
I can transfer just fine using linux from hard drive to hard
drivebut when I use windows explorer I get errors going from linux
drive to linux driveand windows drive to linux driveBUT not from
linux drive to windows drive.
 
Please help...
 
Mark


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Troubleshooting Samba - (2) -Now resolved

2003-01-13 Thread John Blue
This email appears to have been delayed somewhere in cyberspace 
for 4 days. The problem was resolved with support of the many 
helpful people on the lists.

Thanks,
John

 I am running SuSE V8.0, and Samba 2.2.7a on a small 
 network server.
 
 I have been having problems relating to sorting out printing from an
 NT4 workstation to a laser printer on the Samba server.
 
 I had to reboot my Windoze PC and am logged in as myself (I have
 Administrator rights). I can see the shares by looking for the
 computer from Windows explorer using the ip 192.168.0.5 and can
 proceed to add the printer unsing the wizard, however it fails on
 trying to finish the process. I can see this PC in network
 neighborhood as penguin its name , but get an access denied.
 
 I did not have this access problem until I had to reboot the windows
 PC. I have the following entries in my lmhosts file: 192.168.0.1  
 p111 #P111 office 192.168.0.2   loft #Loft pc
 192.168.0.5   penguin  #Linux pc 192.168.0.3notebook   
  #notebook
 
 Notebook is not connected, Loft is another linux PC and is accessible
 without problem, P111 is the NT PC , and penguin is the problem.
 
 From the dos prompt on the P111 I can net view 192.168.0.5, but if I
 try to net view penguin I get System error 59 has occurred, an
 unexpected network error  occurred. From the linux PC penguin,
 smbclient -L lists all the shares on any of the PC's using ip or
 computer name.
 
 Any advice appreciated.
 
 John 
 

This email has been pre-scanned using the latest Anti Virus 
software for your peace of mind.

Please remember to maintain your own anti virus up to date with 
the latest reference files.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Domain member in a Windows 2003 .NET network ?

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Thole
Is it possible with samba 2.2.7 or samba 3.0 to join a domain with Windows
2003 (.NET server) domain ?

I have try to connect a samba hosts (2.2.7a) to a Windows 2003 PDC, but the
shares are not listed (smbclient -L).



Martin Thole
Aachen - Germany

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] add driver

2003-01-13 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,

I'm trying to add driver to the print$ share in Windows 2000 as a printer
administrator. But after selecting Printers/Server Properties/Drivers, all
tabs cannot be selected (grayed out). Is there a way I can enable them so
workstations can automatically install the print drivers? The print$ path is
/var/lib/samba/printers, and permission is set to 755 with
user:group=root:root. I tried 777 and change group to printer admin but
nothing worked. Would someone please help?

Regards,
Norman

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Which filesystem to increase Samba performances ?

2003-01-13 Thread Shawn Wright
I have been gradually moving our user storage from NT servers to RH 
Linux servers over the past two years, and have found the following based 
on our very specific needs:

SGI's XFS filesystem on RedHat 7.x has been a stable platform since 
going into production on a machine serving 400 students last year. It is 
running fairly modest hardware (P3/500, non-raid UW-SCSI disks) but is 
able to keep up with much faster NT machines quite well, even when 
dealing with over 100 concurrent users.
Last summer, when it came time for another server migration, I looked 
into EXT3 as an alternative to XFS and encountered the following:

Performance with EXT3 was below that of XFS 1.1 in nearly every case, 
often by more than 15%. Tests were by no means scientific, but consisting 
of repeated cycles of file reading  writing to/from NT clients. Times were 
measured multiple iterations with file sizes of 8K, 50K, 1Mb and 10Mb.

If EXT3 had other redeeming qualities, I could have overlooked the 
performance issues, but it didn't: 
-quotas: this is something we *need* and they work nicely in XFS, but I 
had no success getting them to work with EXT3 on Redhat 7.3
-ACLs: this is another thing we *need*, and the situation was very similar 
to quotas - I had no luck getting them going.

I ended up leaving the new machine with the XFS 1.1 installer version of 
Redhat, since I could not afford the time to get quotas and ACLs going on 
EXT3.

Keep in mind, all the above is very specific to our environment, where 
flexible security (ACLs), quotas, performance, and stability are all critically 
important factors.



On 13 Jan 2003 at 22:16, Jean-Charles Preaux wrote:

 hello,
 i'm a new suscriber of this mailing-list, hoping i'll be able to help u.
 But before i've a question.
 I've to mount a huge file server using Samba.
 We bought a new server, using raid 5 technology.
 My question is, now i've to install on it my favorite operating system :)
 and i ask me which filesystem type i've to use to increase Samba 
performances on it, some people said me xfs, others ext3...
 Which one do u recommend me and why ?
 hoping i've been clear with my question.
 thanks.
 
 
 -- 
 Jean-Charles Preaux
 
 (o_
 //\
 V_/_ Debian GNU/Linux user.
 
 E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
 

Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright
http://www.sls.bc.ca

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba 2.2.7a Large File Corruption

2003-01-13 Thread James John - jrjame
I have been dealing with an issue for the last several weeks.  I have a
large HP/Compaq Alpha server running 2.2.7a.  I have only recently installed
this version to fix a problem of transferring files over 2 GB.  I am now
having another problem where it seems that while it will send the file, it
is corrupting it.  The file that it is corrupting is an output file from
another process and the output size is between 5 GB and 6 GB.  Has anyone
else experienced this and if so have you found anything that can be done.
Thanks.

John R. James, Jr.
Unix Engineer
FSG V IADTU
Acxiom, Corporation
501-342-0455



*

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and
delete the original message or any copy of it from your
computer system. Thank You.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7a Large File Corruption

2003-01-13 Thread John H Terpstra
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, James John - jrjame wrote:

Are you using samba _or_ smbfs?

Samba's smbd will correctly handle large files so long as you have kernel
2.4.x _and_ your samba was compiled with this kernel.

smbfs may have problems with large files so please be specific about your
configuration and how you are using it.

- John T.
Samba-Team

 I have been dealing with an issue for the last several weeks.  I have a
 large HP/Compaq Alpha server running 2.2.7a.  I have only recently installed
 this version to fix a problem of transferring files over 2 GB.  I am now
 having another problem where it seems that while it will send the file, it
 is corrupting it.  The file that it is corrupting is an output file from
 another process and the output size is between 5 GB and 6 GB.  Has anyone
 else experienced this and if so have you found anything that can be done.
 Thanks.

 John R. James, Jr.
 Unix Engineer
 FSG V IADTU
 Acxiom, Corporation
 501-342-0455



 *

 The information contained in this communication is
 confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
 named above, and may be legally privileged.
 If the reader of this message is not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
 prohibited.
 If you have received this communication in error,
 please re-send this communication to the sender and
 delete the original message or any copy of it from your
 computer system. Thank You.



-- 
John H Terpstra
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: [Samba] Exchange data with NT Wins server

2003-01-13 Thread Beast
At 05:02 PM 1/13/2003 -0500, Barry, Christopher wrote:
Mr. Beast,
Do you need this functionality from everywhere, or just from your admin
workstation? 

From any clients, which point its wins server to this samba wins server.

You might try adding the wins server IP of the remote subnet to your
advanced TCPIP 
options on the NIC in windows to see if that helps.

That means we should goes to every clients (500+, no dhcp, no dynamic
update of dns)  :-)
if we have more than 2 site, where to put the rest of wins server?


Let me know how it goes.

idealy, samba should able to resolve any query from client. it should
forward request to other wins server.
tks!


-C



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Oplocks_break FAILURE in 2.2.7? hmm..

2003-01-13 Thread floppy
Dear Samba team.

I have hybrid network with MSDOS / Win9x(ME) / Win2k/XP(NT) computers 
at home. I'm using Samba as PDC. W9x/me clients works fine as so as 
with roving profiles, but I'm experiencing problems with w2k, NT4/XP 
just not test because i'm testing on my box at home and when it'll 
work fine then I'll go to clients from which smaller part has XPs 
installed on PC. I think if it works on w2k so will be working on XP 
too. My problem is nextone: Logon to domain from w2k box is OK(NO 
ERROR). Drives are mapped and everything works fine. Just smb_audit 
tells that the .Desktop.ini cannot found at directory . ?!? I'm 
ignoring it, but when I logout the system begin process of storing 
profile on Samba server and report that some files cannot be stored 
due to problem with share and storing on it. It tells that the 
process is owned by someone else. When I looked in my tty12(security 
console), there were put this BUG stuff: 
.
.
.
Jan 14 02:59:25 Char0n smbd[10945]: [2003/01/14 02:59:25, 0] 
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(684)
Jan 14 02:59:25 Char0n smbd[10945]:   oplock_break: ERROR: 
oplock_break already sent for file Win2
K/floppy/Cookies/prf92.tmp (dev = 30e, inode = 113359, file_id = 280)
Jan 14 02:59:25 Char0n smbd[10945]: [2003/01/14 02:59:25, 0] 
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(600)
Jan 14 02:59:25 Char0n smbd[10945]:   open_mode_check: FAILED when 
breaking oplock (3) on file /ho
me/profiles/Win2K/floppy/Cookies/prf92.tmp, dev = 30e, inode = 113359
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]: [2003/01/14 02:59:28, 0] 
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(684)
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]:   oplock_break: ERROR: 
oplock_break already sent for file Win2
K/floppy/Cookies/prf96.tmp (dev = 30e, inode = 113364, file_id = 432)
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]: [2003/01/14 02:59:28, 0] 
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(600)
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]:   open_mode_check: FAILED when 
breaking oplock (3) on file /ho
me/profiles/Win2K/floppy/Cookies/prf96.tmp, dev = 30e, inode = 113364
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]: [2003/01/14 02:59:28, 0] 
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(684)
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]:   oplock_break: ERROR: 
oplock_break already sent for file Win2
K/floppy/Cookies/prf96.tmp (dev = 30e, inode = 113364, file_id = 432)
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]: [2003/01/14 02:59:28, 0] 
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(600)
Jan 14 02:59:28 Char0n smbd[10945]:   open_mode_check: FAILED when 
breaking oplock (3) on file /ho
me/profiles/Win2K/floppy/Cookies/prf96.tmp, dev = 30e, inode = 113364
.
.
.
and more every logout from w2k box. I don't think I'm a linux guru so 
I'm not reporting this as a BUG(noone knows :), but I'd be 
appreciated if you can help me or explain where the fail is with this.

Complete trace of login/logout

Jan 14 02:48:23 Char0n pam_winbind[10735]: user 'floppy' granted acces
Jan 14 02:48:24 Char0n pam_winbind[10735]: user 'floppy' granted acces
Jan 14 02:48:24 Char0n samba(pam_unix)[10735]: session opened for 
user floppy by (uid=0)
Jan 14 02:48:41 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: VFS_INIT: vfs_ops loaded
Jan 14 02:48:41 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: connect to service public 
by user floppy
Jan 14 02:48:41 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: opendir .
Jan 14 02:48:41 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: open Desktop.ini (fd -1) 
failed: No such file or directo
ry
Jan 14 02:48:41 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: opendir .
Jan 14 02:48:41 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: open Desktop.ini (fd -1) 
failed: No such file or directo
ry
Jan 14 02:48:42 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: VFS_INIT: vfs_ops loaded
Jan 14 02:48:42 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: connect to service public 
by user floppy
Jan 14 02:48:57 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: disconnected
Jan 14 02:49:21 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: [2003/01/14 02:49:21, 0] 
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(684)

Jan 14 02:49:21 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]:   oplock_break: ERROR: 
oplock_break already sent for fil
e Win2K/floppy/Cookies/prf85.tmp (dev = 30e, inode = 113351, file_id 
= 1059)
Jan 14 02:49:21 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: [2003/01/14 02:49:21, 0] 
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(600
)
Jan 14 02:49:21 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]:   open_mode_check: FAILED 
when breaking oplock (3) on fi
le /home/profiles/Win2K/floppy/Cookies/prf85.tmp, dev = 30e, inode = 
113351
Jan 14 02:49:28 Char0n pam_winbind[10735]: user 'floppy' granted acces
Jan 14 02:49:28 Char0n pam_winbind[10735]: user 'floppy' granted acces
Jan 14 02:49:29 Char0n samba(pam_unix)[10735]: session opened for 
user floppy by (uid=0)
Jan 14 02:49:44 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: VFS_INIT: vfs_ops loaded
Jan 14 02:49:44 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: connect to service public 
by user floppy
Jan 14 02:49:44 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: opendir .
Jan 14 02:49:44 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: open Desktop.ini (fd -1) 
failed: No such file or directo
ry
Jan 14 02:49:45 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: opendir .
Jan 14 02:49:45 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: open Desktop.ini (fd -1) 
failed: No such file or directo
ry
Jan 14 02:49:45 Char0n smbd_audit[10735]: VFS_INIT: vfs_ops loaded

RE: [Samba] Exchange data with NT Wins server

2003-01-13 Thread Christopher Barry
Agreed. I have not encountered this situation myself. I use dns for
this, and make my remotes set the ip of my samba nmbd for wins.

Can anyone help this guy!!?

-C

On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:29, Beast wrote:
 At 05:02 PM 1/13/2003 -0500, Barry, Christopher wrote:
 Mr. Beast,
 Do you need this functionality from everywhere, or just from your admin
 workstation? 
 
 From any clients, which point its wins server to this samba wins server.
 
 You might try adding the wins server IP of the remote subnet to your
 advanced TCPIP 
 options on the NIC in windows to see if that helps.
 
 That means we should goes to every clients (500+, no dhcp, no dynamic
 update of dns)  :-)
 if we have more than 2 site, where to put the rest of wins server?
 
 
 Let me know how it goes.
 
 idealy, samba should able to resolve any query from client. it should
 forward request to other wins server.
 tks!
 
 
 -C
 
 
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: [Samba] help

2003-01-13 Thread Christopher Barry
Doctor! Doctor! I broke my leg in two places!
Ahh, better stay out of those places...

On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 22:16, Mark Ryan wrote:
 I am running Redhat 8.0.  I have it networked with winxp.  I was using
 samba successfully until today.  I installed a new harddrive, cpu, and
 motherboard into the linux box.  I transferred files as normal for a
 while but now im getting errors when I transfer.  I get a 'path to deep'
 error now when I try to transfer files in the following methods:
  
 I can transfer just fine using linux from hard drive to hard
 drivebut when I use windows explorer I get errors going from linux
 drive to linux driveand windows drive to linux driveBUT not from
 linux drive to windows drive.
  
 Please help...
  
 Mark
 
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] import_smbpasswd.pl for samba + LDAP

2003-01-13 Thread Long-Sheng Kuo
Hello All!
  I am trying to follow the instructions to store Samba's Uer/Machine 
Account information in an LDAP Directory (Samba-LDAP-HOWTO.html). Is there 
anyone knowing how to run this Perl script: import_smbpasswd.pl in 
examples/LDAP directory? I don't know Perl. :(

  In addition, is there more information/tutorial of LDAP available on line?

  Thank you very much.

Long-Sheng   Jan 14. 03

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Issue with adding machines to domain

2003-01-13 Thread Luke Bowerman

Okay, here's the situtation I have a samba server (2.2.3a) which is the
PDC for a domain with approximately 60 windows 2000 clients. 

Up until recently I haven't had any problems with using it for roaming
profiles and domain authentication, however since last thursday I have
not been able to successfully create machine account that would work.
When following the procedure that has worked before just fine on this
server in the past the Windows 2000 machine takes 3-4 minutes to respond
(the add to domain window is completely non-responsive) and then I get
a perky message back saying You machine has been added to the CHS
domain. When I restart and attempt to logon to the domain I get a
message saying the domain could not be found.

The entry in /etc/samba/smbpasswd looks like this:

somemachine$:22712:NOPASSWD-XXX:NOPASSWD-X:[NDW
 ]:LCT-3E23544F:

I have tried this on a variety of different systems (all 2000), systems
that have been on the domain before (I removed and then attempted to
re-add them), systems that have never been on the domain, and brand new
installs on brand new hardware.

Machines still attached to the domain can log in, browse the network,
and use roaming profiles perfectly.

For the life of me I swear I've gone through everything I can think of
that would cause something like this to no avail. Any help that you
folks can offer me would be greatly appreciated.

Luke Bowerman
Olympia School Distict - Olympia, WA
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



please report to samba-technical@samba.org

2003-01-13 Thread Wolfgang . Fuertbauer
here you are:

[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
  spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
  spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
  spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
  spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/10 12:38:30, 0]
 rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(98)
 [2003/01/10 12:38:31, 0]
 rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(98)

best regards
Wolfgang Fürtbauer
--
Wolfgang Fuertbauer (E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
EBEWE Pharma  Tel: ++43 7665 8123 315
Mondseestrasse 11 Fax: ++43 7665 8123 11
4866  Unterach, Austria
http://www.ebewe.com






Re: [PATCH 2.2.7a] was: Samba Referrals

2003-01-13 Thread Ignacio Coupeau
http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html#patches

Tested the rebind  stuff with ldap in round robin (master/slave)
Some fixes
Tar and diff -uRn textfiles available:
	http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/patches-ldap.tar
	http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/patches-ldap/

As two of the patches are for configure.in and configure.h.in, an 
autoconf is required before the configure.

Tested in
Mandrake 8.2/9.0 (Buchan Milne, C.Lee Taylor) and RedHat 7.2, kernel 
2.4.x, OpenLDAP 2.0.25-27 and 2.1.7

Ignacio
--

Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTI, Director  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Navarra  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pamplona, SPAINhttp://www.unav.es/cti/



[PATCH] samstrict_dc only patch

2003-01-13 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi Andrew,

can you please apply the samstrict_dc only patch.

people who need this can set the 'auth method' paramter
and the current behavior isn't changed now.

I attached a patch for HEAD and one for 3_0

thanks :-)


metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
diff -Npur --exclude=CVS --exclude=*.bak --exclude=*.o --exclude=*.po --exclude=*.so 
--exclude=.#* --exclude=Makefile --exclude=stamp-h --exclude=configure 
--exclude=findsmb --exclude=*proto*.h --exclude=build_env.h 
--exclude=tdbsam2_parse_info.h --exclude=config.* --exclude=bin --exclude=*.configure 
HEAD/source/auth/auth.c HEAD-fix/source/auth/auth.c
--- HEAD/source/auth/auth.c Sun Jan  5 12:16:32 2003
+++ HEAD-fix/source/auth/auth.c Mon Jan 13 09:55:53 2003
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static const struct auth_init_function_e
{ hostsequiv, auth_init_hostsequiv },
{ sam, auth_init_sam },   
{ samstrict, auth_init_samstrict },
+   { samstrict_dc, auth_init_samstrict_dc },
{ unix, auth_init_unix },
{ smbserver, auth_init_smbserver },
{ ntdomain, auth_init_ntdomain },
diff -Npur --exclude=CVS --exclude=*.bak --exclude=*.o --exclude=*.po --exclude=*.so 
--exclude=.#* --exclude=Makefile --exclude=stamp-h --exclude=configure 
--exclude=findsmb --exclude=*proto*.h --exclude=build_env.h 
--exclude=tdbsam2_parse_info.h --exclude=config.* --exclude=bin --exclude=*.configure 
HEAD/source/auth/auth_sam.c HEAD-fix/source/auth/auth_sam.c
--- HEAD/source/auth/auth_sam.c Sun Jan  5 12:16:32 2003
+++ HEAD-fix/source/auth/auth_sam.c Mon Jan 13 09:55:06 2003
@@ -480,6 +480,8 @@ static NTSTATUS check_samstrict_security
   unless it is one of our aliases. */

if (!is_myname(user_info-domain.str)) {
+   DEBUG(7,(The requested user domain is not the local server name. 
+[%s]\\[%s]\n,
+   user_info-domain.str,user_info-internal_username.str));
return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
}

@@ -498,4 +500,45 @@ NTSTATUS auth_init_samstrict(struct auth
return NT_STATUS_OK;
 }
 
+/
+Check SAM security (above) but with a few extra checks if we're a DC.
+/
 
+static NTSTATUS check_samstrict_dc_security(const struct auth_context *auth_context,
+void *my_private_data, 
+TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+const auth_usersupplied_info *user_info, 
+auth_serversupplied_info **server_info)
+{
+
+   if (!user_info || !auth_context) {
+   return NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE;
+   }
+
+   /* If we are a domain member, we must not 
+  attempt to check the password locally,
+  unless it is one of our aliases, empty
+  or our domain if we are a logon server.*/
+   
+
+   if ((!is_myworkgroup(user_info-domain.str))
+   (!is_myname(user_info-domain.str))) {
+   DEBUG(7,(The requested user domain is not the local server name or 
+our domain. [%s]\\[%s]\n,
+   user_info-domain.str,user_info-internal_username.str));
+   return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
+   }   
+
+   return check_sam_security(auth_context, my_private_data, mem_ctx, user_info, 
+server_info);
+}
+
+/* module initialisation */
+NTSTATUS auth_init_samstrict_dc(struct auth_context *auth_context, const char *param, 
+auth_methods **auth_method) 
+{
+   if (!make_auth_methods(auth_context, auth_method)) {
+   return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
+   }
+
+   (*auth_method)-auth = check_samstrict_dc_security;
+   (*auth_method)-name = samstrict_dc;
+   return NT_STATUS_OK;
+}
diff -Npur --exclude=CVS --exclude=*.bak --exclude=*.o --exclude=*.po --exclude=*.so 
--exclude=.#* --exclude=Makefile --exclude=stamp-h --exclude=configure 
--exclude=findsmb --exclude=*proto*.h --exclude=build_env.h 
--exclude=tdbsam2_parse_info.h --exclude=config.* --exclude=bin --exclude=*.configure 
HEAD/source/lib/util.c HEAD-fix/source/lib/util.c
--- HEAD/source/lib/util.c  Sun Jan  5 12:16:33 2003
+++ HEAD-fix/source/lib/util.c  Mon Jan 13 09:59:53 2003
@@ -1723,6 +1723,23 @@ BOOL is_myname_or_ipaddr(const char *s)

/* no match */
return False;
+}
+
+/***
+ Is the name specified our workgroup/domain.
+ Returns true if it is equal, false otherwise.
+/
+
+BOOL is_myworkgroup(const char *s)
+{
+   BOOL ret = False;
+
+   if (strequal(s, lp_workgroup())) {
+   ret=True;
+   }
+
+   DEBUG(8, (is_myworkgroup(\%s\) 

RE: please report to samba-technical@samba.org

2003-01-13 Thread Green, Paul
Umm, what OS?  What version of Samba?   Who/what is the client (Windows
version xyz?)  What were the clients doing to make this happen? (if you
know)...  Can you make a test case?

Thanks
PG

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


here you are:

[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
  spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
  spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
  spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
  spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/10 12:38:30, 0]
 rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(98)
 [2003/01/10 12:38:31, 0]
 rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(98)

best regards
Wolfgang Fürtbauer
--
Wolfgang Fuertbauer (E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
EBEWE Pharma  Tel: ++43 7665 8123 315
Mondseestrasse 11 Fax: ++43 7665 8123 11
4866  Unterach, Austria
http://www.ebewe.com





Antwort: RE: please report to samba-technical@samba.org

2003-01-13 Thread Wolfgang . Fuertbauer
Server:
Linux xylophon 2.4.19-64GB-SMP #1 SMP Fri Sep 13 13:15:53 UTC 2002 i686
unknown
smbd -V
Version 2.2.7a-SuSE

Clients:
Windows 2000

On 13.01.2003 14:40:55 Green, Paul wrote:
Umm, what OS?  What version of Samba?   Who/what is the client (Windows
version xyz?)  What were the clients doing to make this happen? (if you
know)...  Can you make a test case?

printing via samba and lprng;
(part) of the config-file:
what else can I do to test?

# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from fuertw.intern.ebewe.at (172.16.20.1)
# Date: 2003/01/02 19:22:42

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = EBEWEAT
interfaces = 172.16.4.1/255.255.0.0
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
password server = *
name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast host
time server = Yes
; keepalive = 60
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY
os level = 100
preferred master = True
wins proxy = Yes
wins support = Yes
kernel oplocks = No
printer admin = @edv
printing = lprng
; oplocks = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /tmp
create mask = 0700
printable = Yes
browseable = No


Thanks
PG

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


here you are:

[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/10 12:38:30, 0]
rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(98)
[2003/01/10 12:38:31, 0]
rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(98)

best regards
Wolfgang Fürtbauer
--
Wolfgang Fuertbauer (E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
EBEWE Pharma  Tel: ++43 7665 8123 315
Mondseestrasse 11 Fax: ++43 7665 8123 11
4866  Unterach, Austria
http://www.ebewe.com

--
Wolfgang Fuertbauer (E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
EBEWE Pharma  Tel: ++43 7665 8123 315
Mondseestrasse 11 Fax: ++43 7665 8123 11
4866  Unterach, Austria
http://www.ebewe.com






RE: OT Recent virus

2003-01-13 Thread David Brodbeck


 -Original Message-
 From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

 Virus scanners and any other automatic responders should 
 never send out 
 messages to mailing lists.

In my own mail filters, the way I've been doing this is to never
auto-respond to a message set Precendence: bulk or Precedence: list.  Is
this correct, or is there a better way?



Problem with nt acl support when saving Excel or Word Files

2003-01-13 Thread Christoph Mack
Hello!

I am running a Samba 2.2.5 Server with winbind and acl support on a SuSE Linux
8.1 (Kernel 2.4.19) box. I have a problem with saving and reopening Files
from a Windows2000 client with Word and Excel. The Files do not belong to the
editing user even though he should have the rights to save the File because
he is a member of the owning group which has rwx permissions.

I have the following getent passwd output for 2 Users A and B:
Admin:x:10:100:Administrator:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
A:x:20:100:User A:/home/A:/bin/bash
B:x:30:100:User A:/home/A:/bin/bash

...and the following getent group output:
G:x:100:A,B,Admin
H:x:200:A,B

I export a share /u00 with an xfs Filesystem on it.
The /u00/test Directory has the following acls:

# file: u00/test
# owner: Admin
# group: H
user::rwx
group::rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
default:group::rwx
default:group:G:rwx
default:group:H:rwx
default:mask::rwx
default:other::---

The Excel File excel.xls has the following acls:

# file: excel.xls
# owner: A
# group: H
user::rwx
group::rwx
other::---

Now from my Win2K client when I open excel.xls as User B change something and
save it again, I get the following error message from Excel:
Document saved successfully. Cannot reopen the saved document due to low
memory. Please close the document.

The thing with the low memory is of course not true. The reason why Excel
cannot reopen the document (rw) reveals if we have a look at the acls of the
changed file:

# file: Mobilkom-Aufstellung.xls
# owner: B
# group: G
user::r--
user:A:rwx
group::---
group:H:rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
 
!
The file now belongs to B and he has only READ permissions!! :(((
!

AFAIK when saving a file Excel saves into a temporary File first. It then
deletes the original File and move the temporary File to the original
Filename. When I disable nt acl support I do not have the problem. I already
played with various settings of create modem force create mode, ... and
default acls on the /u00/test directory but nothing helped!

Does anybody know a solution?

Below you can find my smb.conf File:

thank you in Advance
   Christoph Mack

--

[global]
workgroup = XYZ
netbios name = FILESERVER
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = *
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
character set = ISO8859-15
os level = 2
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
template shell = /bin/bash

[u00]
comment = Testshare
path = /u00
read only = No
inherit acls = yes
inherit permissions = yes
nt acl support = yes
fstype = Samba




libsmbclient example compilation problems

2003-01-13 Thread Tuomas Niinimäki
Hello,

I'm experiencing problems with compiling the libsmbclient examples (as
well as my own libsmbclient test programs). It seems like there are some
problems with the include files, as I get following errors:

gcc -I../../source/include   -c -o testsmbc.o testsmbc.c
In file included from testsmbc.c:30:
../../source/include/libsmbclient.h:199: field `cli' has incomplete type
../../source/include/libsmbclient.h:201: parse error before `BOOL'
(and about 500 lines more :)

I'm using gcc-3.2.2, but I'm receiving same errors with gcc-3.0.4 and
2.95.4. Any help will be appreciated.

-- 
Tuomas Niinimäki [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: libsmbclient example compilation problems

2003-01-13 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tuomas Niinimäki wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I'm experiencing problems with compiling the libsmbclient examples (as
 well as my own libsmbclient test programs). It seems like there are some
 problems with the include files, as I get following errors:
 
 gcc -I../../source/include   -c -o testsmbc.o testsmbc.c
 In file included from testsmbc.c:30:
 ../../source/include/libsmbclient.h:199: field `cli' has incomplete type
 ../../source/include/libsmbclient.h:201: parse error before `BOOL'
 (and about 500 lines more :)

Which version of Samba are you using?

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com




Re: libsmbclient example compilation problems

2003-01-13 Thread Tuomas Niinimäki
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 21:01, Richard Sharpe wrote:
 Which version of Samba are you using?
 

Hmm, version seems to be samba-2.999+3.0.alpha21, actually this is
source package from unstable debian. Perhaps I should try something
earlier and more stable :)

-- 
Tuomas Niinimäki [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: libsmbclient example compilation problems

2003-01-13 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tuomas Niinimäki wrote:

 On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 21:01, Richard Sharpe wrote:
  Which version of Samba are you using?
  
 
 Hmm, version seems to be samba-2.999+3.0.alpha21, actually this is
 source package from unstable debian. Perhaps I should try something
 earlier and more stable :)

OK, so it is the Samba 3.0 stuff that Vorlon got into Debian.

I thought that we fixed that.

Let me look into it some more.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com




Re: libsmbclient example compilation problems

2003-01-13 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tuomas Niinimäki wrote:

 On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 21:01, Richard Sharpe wrote:
  Which version of Samba are you using?
  
 
 Hmm, version seems to be samba-2.999+3.0.alpha21, actually this is
 source package from unstable debian. Perhaps I should try something
 earlier and more stable :)

OK, I see the problems. Samba 3.0.x is not in sync with Samba head. Try 
pulling samba-head, and in the mean time, I will do my janitorial duties.

Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, 
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com




Change Notification

2003-01-13 Thread Juergen Hasch
Jeremy,

I'm having problems with change notification in Samba 2.2.x under Linux 
since you changed the signal
handling stuff some time ago.
An application I'm using always complains about missing change 
notification, although it used to work.
I always failed to find out what's wrong, but now I know :-)

What is happening is that Samba receives a change notification signal 
from the Linux kernel and sometimes
simply does not process it, which means that no further signals will be 
send by the Kernel (DN_MULTISHOT isn't set)
for the same event.
Processing of the received signal happens for file rename and delete in 
but not for copying.
In reply.c/reply_write_and_X() I added  a call to
   process_pending_change_notify_queue((time_t)0);
and now change notification works again for my testcase here.

I'm sure you now a better place where  
process_pending_change_notify_queue() should go to catch
file copy events :-)

..Juergen




Re: Change Notification

2003-01-13 Thread jra
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:06:46PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
 Jeremy,
 
 I'm having problems with change notification in Samba 2.2.x under Linux 
 since you changed the signal
 handling stuff some time ago.
 An application I'm using always complains about missing change 
 notification, although it used to work.
 I always failed to find out what's wrong, but now I know :-)
 
 What is happening is that Samba receives a change notification signal 
 from the Linux kernel and sometimes
 simply does not process it, which means that no further signals will be 
 send by the Kernel (DN_MULTISHOT isn't set)
 for the same event.
 Processing of the received signal happens for file rename and delete in 
 but not for copying.
 In reply.c/reply_write_and_X() I added  a call to
 process_pending_change_notify_queue((time_t)0);
  and now change notification works again for my testcase here.
 
 I'm sure you now a better place where  
 process_pending_change_notify_queue() should go to catch
 file copy events :-)

Can you give me more details please about where smbd is missing
the signal ? smbd should not be able to miss these signals, as
all they do is set a flag that is then processed inline in the
main loop.

Please give me more details asap.

Thanks,

Jeremy.



Re: Change Notification

2003-01-13 Thread Juergen Hasch
Below is my test program, nothing special:

/* test change notification */
#include windows.h
#include stdio.h

int main()
{
DWORD dwWaitStatus;
HANDLE dwChangeHandles[1];


dwChangeHandles[0] = FindFirstChangeNotification(
   i:\\TEST, // directory to watch
   FALSE, // do not watch the subtree
   FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_FILE_NAME); // watch file name changes


if (dwChangeHandles[0] == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
   exit(GetLastError());

printf(Starting change notification\n);
// Change notification is set. Now wait on both notification
// handles and refresh accordingly.

   while (TRUE) {
   dwWaitStatus = WaitForMultipleObjects(1, dwChangeHandles,
   FALSE, INFINITE);

   printf(.);
   switch (dwWaitStatus) {
   case WAIT_OBJECT_0:
   if (FindNextChangeNotification( dwChangeHandles[0]) == 
FALSE )
   exit(GetLastError());
   break;
   default:
   printf( Change notify failure\n);
   exit(0);
   break;
   }
   }
   return 0;
}

I can't tell you if the change I made to reply.c completely solves my 
problem , I'll need to test this at work.
But what I found out would explain the effects I had.

...Juergen




Re: Change Notification

2003-01-13 Thread jra
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:39:27PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
 
 
 Can you give me more details please about where smbd is missing
 the signal ? smbd should not be able to miss these signals, as
 all they do is set a flag that is then processed inline in the
 main loop.
 
 Please give me more details asap.
 
 For testing  I have a simple windows program to activates change 
 notification for a given directory on
 the Samba side. I can then see what is happening when I copy, remove or 
 delete files (this is
 what I tested). The Samba server is Suse 8.1 with the latest 2.4 kernel 
 and Samba 2_2 CVS,
  my client is a W2K WS.
 
 When I check the signal_handler() function in notify_kernel.c I can see, 
 that after starting a new
 smbd  I get a signal when I copy/move/delete a file. For copy this 
 happens only once, for
 rename/delete signal_handler is called every time.
 When I check the kernel_remove_notify() /  kernel_register_notify() 
 functions which have to be
 called every time after a signal is received, they only get called for 
 move or delete operations.

So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
bug - correct ?

Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
occurs so I can see how to make smbd work around it until we get the
kernel fixed.

Jeremy.



Re: please report to samba-technical@samba.org

2003-01-13 Thread Tim Potter
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:

  [2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
  [2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!

 Umm, what OS?  What version of Samba?   Who/what is the client (Windows
 version xyz?)  What were the clients doing to make this happen? (if you
 know)...  Can you make a test case?

Even better would be a capture (either with tcpdump or Microsoft netmon)
of this exchange.


Tim.



Re: OT Recent virus

2003-01-13 Thread John E. Malmberg
David Brodbeck wrote:

From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]



Virus scanners and any other automatic responders should 
never send out messages to mailing lists.

In my own mail filters, the way I've been doing this is to never
auto-respond to a message set Precendence: bulk or Precedence: list.  Is
this correct, or is there a better way?


I would assume so.  I would expect that if a virus scanner was any good, 
it would be set that way by default.

-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only



Re: [PATCH] trans2 querypathinfo alt name

2003-01-13 Thread jra
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:07:50PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
 Hi Jerry,
 
 I noticed that if I'm using MS Access 97 on a NT4 machine I can't access to 
 database files witch are in directories 12 chars, but if I do the same 
 thing on an w2k or NT4 server is works.
 
 I see that the respond to the query alt file name call send a mangle name 
 in unicode with termination.
 
 but the windows servers didn't send the termination
 
 I also wonder why we set the LONG FILE NAMES are in use flag in the SMB 
 HEADER flags2
 
 this is also different to windows...
 
 I attache a small patch and a view sniffs

Did this patch fix the problem ? I'm investigating this at the moment.

Thanks,

Jeremy.



Re: recursive mutexes in appl_head winbindd_cm.c?

2003-01-13 Thread jra
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:25:20PM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
   Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
   the mutex reference count.
  
  Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to this. Take
  a look and let me know... 
 
 I think I've figured out what the problem is.  There can be only one
 outstanding challenge per IP address so the mutex needs to be around the
 ServerReqChallenge and ServerAuthenticate2 calls.
 
 A short test program confirms this.  If I open two cli handles to the
 same domain controller and perform two ServerReqChallenge calls then
 two ServerAuthenticate2 calls, both authentications fail with access
 denied.  Performing the authentications immediately after the challenge
 requests works correctly.

Err - do you mean the mutex must look like :

get_mutex:
ServerReqChallenge
ServerAuthenticate2
release_mutex:

Just checking :-).

Jeremy.



Re: recursive mutexes in appl_head winbindd_cm.c?

2003-01-13 Thread Tim Potter
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
  Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
  the mutex reference count.
 
 Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to this. Take
 a look and let me know... 

I think I've figured out what the problem is.  There can be only one
outstanding challenge per IP address so the mutex needs to be around the
ServerReqChallenge and ServerAuthenticate2 calls.

A short test program confirms this.  If I open two cli handles to the
same domain controller and perform two ServerReqChallenge calls then
two ServerAuthenticate2 calls, both authentications fail with access
denied.  Performing the authentications immediately after the challenge
requests works correctly.

Thanks to Andrew Bartlett for pointing out the obvious.  (-:


Tim.



Re: Change Notification

2003-01-13 Thread Juergen Hasch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
bug - correct ?

Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
occurs so I can see how to make smbd work around it until we get the
kernel fixed.

 

No it's Samba receiving a signal from the kernel, but not processing it 
further inside Samba.

In notify_kernel/signal_handler() signals_received gets increased when a 
change notification
is received from the kernel. Now the change notification for this type 
of event (e.g. copy/
rename/delete...) needs to be processed inside Samba.
This is done in process_pending_change_notify_queue() which is called 
from a few places
inside e.g. reply.c.
This is not happening for file copy in my test setup here (using the 
copy command in windows).
This means the kernel change notification is no longer active for this 
type of event, because it
needs to be restarted in notify_kernel.c/kernel_register_notify().

Eventually process_pending_change_notify_queue() is called by chance and 
the received
change notification signal gets processed at a later random time.

So I think Samba forgets to call process_pending_change_notify_queue() 
after a copy operation,
so a Windows application waiting for a change notification doesn't get 
noticed or only after some
time when other file operations triggered the 
process_pending_change_notify_queue() call.

...Juergen




Antwort: Re: please report to samba-technical@samba.org

2003-01-13 Thread Wolfgang . Fuertbauer

On 13.01.2003 23:36:08 Tim Potter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:

  [2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
  [2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!

 Umm, what OS?  What version of Samba?   Who/what is the client (Windows
 version xyz?)  What were the clients doing to make this happen? (if you
 know)...  Can you make a test case?

Even better would be a capture (either with tcpdump or Microsoft netmon)
of this exchange.

I would do that; but as far as I can see this behaviour happened only once;

Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Fuertbauer (E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
EBEWE Pharma  Tel: ++43 7665 8123 315
Mondseestrasse 11 Fax: ++43 7665 8123 11
4866  Unterach, Austria
http://www.ebewe.com






CVS update: samba/source/libsmb

2003-01-13 Thread abartlet

Date:   Mon Jan 13 08:53:54 2003
Author: abartlet

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15419/libsmb

Modified Files:
smbencrypt.c 
Log Message:
Don't force the DOS password into a 14 char space, as this would imply null
termination - the password will not be null terminated before hashing if 
len = 14.

related to debian bug #157432

Andrew Bartlett


Revisions:
smbencrypt.c1.81 = 1.82

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/smbencrypt.c?r1=1.81r2=1.82



CVS update: samba/source/auth

2003-01-13 Thread abartlet

Date:   Mon Jan 13 12:21:07 2003
Author: abartlet

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/auth
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32459/auth

Modified Files:
auth_util.c 
Log Message:
Fix to debian bug #171071 - we had the wrong dereference on the pointer to be
Realloc()ed, causing it to fail.

Big thanks to Sandor Sonfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the debug, stack and
valgrind traces!

Andrew Bartlett


Revisions:
auth_util.c 1.59 = 1.60

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/auth/auth_util.c?r1=1.59r2=1.60



CVS update: samba/source/lib

2003-01-13 Thread abartlet

Date:   Mon Jan 13 12:42:20 2003
Author: abartlet

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2749/lib

Modified Files:
data_blob.c util.c util_str.c 
Log Message:
Accessing data after it's been free()ed really is a no-no...

Andrew Bartlett


Revisions:
data_blob.c 1.2 = 1.3
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/data_blob.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
util.c  1.384 = 1.385
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util.c?r1=1.384r2=1.385
util_str.c  1.72 = 1.73
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/util_str.c?r1=1.72r2=1.73



CVS update: samba/source/include

2003-01-13 Thread abartlet

Date:   Mon Jan 13 12:48:37 2003
Author: abartlet

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2851/include

Modified Files:
includes.h rpc_dce.h 
Added Files:
ntlmssp.h 
Log Message:
Updates to our NTLMSSP code:

This tries to extract our server-side code out of sessetup.c, and into a more
general lib.  I hope this is only a temporay resting place - I indend to
refactor it again into an auth-subsystem independent lib, using callbacks.

Move some of our our NTLMSSP #defines into a new file, and add two that I found
in the COMsource docs - we seem to have a double-up, but I've verified from
traces that the NTLMSSP_TARGET_TYPE_{DOMAIN,SERVER} is real.

This code also copes with ASCII clients - not that we will ever see any here,
but I hope to use this for HTTP, were we can get them.  Win2k authenticates
fine under forced ASCII, btw. 

Tested with Win2k, NTLMv2 and Samba's smbclient.

Andrew Bartlett


Revisions:
ntlmssp.h   NONE = 1.1
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/ntlmssp.h?rev=1.1
includes.h  1.289 = 1.290

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/includes.h?r1=1.289r2=1.290
rpc_dce.h   1.26 = 1.27

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/rpc_dce.h?r1=1.26r2=1.27



  1   2   >