[Samba] Maximum Length Of Printer Name
Hi All, Just a quick question, what is the max length of a printer name in samba? I am currently running samba 3.0.4 and keep receiving the following message:- May 13 07:28:09 gandalf1 smbd[2316]: [2004/05/13 07:28:09, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(602) May 13 07:28:09 gandalf1 smbd[2316]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (32 - 31) in safe_strcpy [\\gandalf1\MirrorsA4PicklistPrinter] The message only appears to affect printers which have name of 32 characters or more. It doesn't cause any issues but it would be good if I could sort it and tidy the log file up. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks In Advance Jez -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Virus Alert
The mail message (file: your_document.pif) you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains a virus. (on mail.dmoch.de) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Abi99-FreeAtLast
Vielen Dank, dass Du Dich an den Webmaster von Abi99-FreeAtLast.de gewendet hast. Die e-Mail wird in Kürze bearbeitet. Viele Gruesse! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
AW: [Samba] SID History Mechanism / Trust Accounts
Hello, | -|Hello everybody, -| -|1. Question -|When migration from an nt4 style domain to a new samba 3 -|style domain with ldapsam , -|it is necessary to preserve the old SIDs of the user to keep the users -|in touch with the old servers. M$ calles this SID history, which means -|that the old SID is added to new accounts in an AD. -|Does samba have any equal mechanism? so far i found out, that there's an LDAP Attribute sambaSIDList on the subversion server http://tinyurl.com/3edtz. Is this the attribute, which cares about the SID history? It's important to know thanks. -| -|2. Question -|Does net rpc vampire preserve domain trust accounts? The second question is still interesting Regards, Dirk Laurenz Systems Engineer PSO - Professional Service Organisation Fujitsu Siemens Computers Hildesheimer Strasse 25 30880 Laatzen Germany Telephone: +49 (511) 84 89 - 18 08 Telefax:+49 (511) 84 89 - 25 18 08 Mobile: +49 (170) 22 10 781 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com http://www.fujitsu-siemens.de/rl/servicesupport/itdienstleistungen/compe tencecenter.html *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Net groupmap Question.
Samba users - On redhat linux machine, I'm unable to map unix groups to nt groups. The net groupmap command returns no such object. The net groupmap list returns an empty list. I'm using ldapsam backend. It seems that the nt groups must added to the ldap directory first for this to work. This workstation is just a workgroup server. How does one add groups to the ldapsam backend? Via ldif file? Any links on this would be appreciated. Thanks Jay -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Yet Another LDAP Question
Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What you CAN do is use PAM_smbpass, with the migrate flag, and migrate all
> of the UNIX passwords this way. This way, when a user logs in via UNIX or
> Samba, their password makes it into the Samba password file. You never
> actually have to turn on password encryption via smbpasswd, 'far as I
> know, but this will give you a list of NT hashes to work with to then
> convert.
>
> Does this help at all?
Sorry, not in here - we've got Slackware machines without PAM.
--
Michal Kurowski
perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{>: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#;
y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print'
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: humble plea - once more
Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not true. Use "update encrypted = yes" or PAM_smbpass. That's what I did.
> Works great. You don't get DIRECTLY to LDAP that way, but you do get the
> passwords hashed from UNIX.
Thanks a lot, but do I get it right ?
I've got my unix passwords crypted in the Ldap server, I turn samba on
(with "update encrypted = yes" and "encrypt passwords = no") and
users on XP machines are able to log in immediately ?
Are you sure NT passwords in the Ldap server will be updated this way ?
--
Michal Kurowski
perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{>: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#;
y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print'
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows Read Only attribute, and Microsoft Excel.
Tried, but I can only fix the files after they have been opened by excel. If i reset the permissions beforehand, the problem still happens the first time you open excel. I'm really stumped... Alex Laslavic Havertys Tech Services Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/12/2004 07:07:29 PM: > Could you do a chown or chmod -R for recursively would that let you fix > all of the files with out having to do each one by hand? > > probably not what you are looking for. > > > > Jim > > > On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 11:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I have recently started migrating a Win2k fileserver to a Samba 3.0.2a > > server. Running in full ADS mode, with winbind enabled for authentication > > against our Win2k PDC. I am also running as much of the ACL support as I > > can. > > > > The problem I am encountering involves excel documents. The documents are > > migrated from the Win2k server, to the Samba server, and are retaining all > > of the ACL's during the move. The problem is, if somebody opens the excel > > document from a windows client (excel 2000), and then saves it, the file is > > saved (or re-written actually) with changed permissions. The owner is > > changed to the person who modified the document, which is ok, but the > > permissons are changed to "470" on the file, and shows up in windows as > > Read Only to everybody, even if they are part of an ACL that has RWX. > > > > If the owner removes the Read Only checkbox in windows, or, if I modify the > > permissions for the owner to RWX in linux, the file will be "fixed" > > permanently, even after subsequent edits / changes of owner. > > > > It doesn't happen to newly created excel documents, only to the migrated > > ones. Once the migrated file is "fixed" the problem never comes up again > > on that file. > > > > Can anybody think of whats happening here, or suggest anything I can do > > about it? I have a few hundred-thousand excel documents to move, so fixing > > this manually is not an option. > > > > Thanks > > > > --alex > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] preexec script problem
i guess my original post wasn't clear.
i wanted to grab the FULLNAME of the user, not the username (%U)
well, here is the script, adding that to smb.conf will pull the FULLNAME
of the user from the SID file on a PDC and make a dir in /samba/test/
preexec = fullname=`getent passwd | grep %U \
| awk -F: '{print $5}' \
| sed -e 's/ /_/g'` ; mkdir $fullname
thanks to all that replied.
-ipguy
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| hi all
|
| i'm running into a little problem when using preexec scripts for the
creation
| of dir's on my samba server
|
| script
| ---
| #! /bin/sh
| name=`getent passwd | grep %U | awk -F: '{print $5}'`
| mkdir /samba/test/"$name"
| ---
|
| snip of smb.conf
| ---
| [test]
| path = /samba/test
| preexec = /root/script
| browseable = Yes
| writeable = Yes
| valid users = @mygroup
| force group = @mygroup
| create mask = 0770
| force create mode = 770
| ---
|
| anyone have any idea why the dir is not created under "/samba/test" ?
|
Your users don't have permission to run the scrippt /root/script, and/or
they don't have permission to run create files in /samba/test (or both).
You could just do:
public=no
preexec = mkdir /samba/test %U
or, if you don't want arbitrary users to create arbitrary directories in
/samba/test, rather do:
root preexec = mkdir /samba/test/%U && chown %U:%G /samba/test/%U
(it's a waste writing an external script for something that fits into
samba's 256 character limit on configuration entries ...).
Regards,
Buchan
P.S. you should also consider using 'getent passwd $USER' instead of
'getent passwd|grep $USER', the former is faster, will only return one
entry, and won't return any incorrect entries ...
- --
Buchan Milne Senior Support Technician
Obsidian Systems http://www.obsidian.co.za
B.EngRHCE (803004789010797)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAokkVrJK6UGDSBKcRAgEgAJ4+4LzW0UHgQtOpHSo/v30bnEDNRACeNkEK
/BsCDKolQBWb9zxyjkancds=
=HOMD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] ou=computers ???
See at #987 bug. There is a workarround : The work arround is to configure nssldap user suffix to a suffix containing both users and machines entries in its scope (but it's not very usefull...). Ex : you have people in ou=users,dc=toto,dc=com and machines in ou=computers,dc=toto,dc=com And the user suffix in nssldap configuration set up to : dc=toto,dc=com With that, you can have in your smb.conf : ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers Yohann F. users and machines entries in its scope (but it's not very usefull...). Le mar 11/05/2004 à 22:10, Ross Becker a écrit : > This is a known problem. The developers have only commented that you > > should use the same container for machines as for people in samba 3.0.x > thus far. I have filed this as bug #1292, but thus far there has been no > official word on a fix. > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292 > > Cheers > Ross Becker > Francesco Defilippo wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > why in the new 3.0.3/4 when a new windows machine join on domain > > samba search (in ldap backend) on ou=Users and not in ou=computers? > > > > > > my smb.conf: > > > >ldap passwd sync = Yes > >ldap admin dn = "cn=ldap manager,dc=intra,dc=local" > >ldap suffix = dc=intra,dc=local > >ldap group suffix = ou=Groups > >ldap user suffix = ou=Users > >ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers > >ldap idmap suffix = ou=Users > > > > > > > > > > > >SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497 > > -- Yohann F. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Patch for unix extensions
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 04:34:30PM -0400, Rohit Kumar Mehta wrote: > Hi guys, I know Jon Newbigin made a post about this quite a while back > > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2002-December/026141.html > > and there was some discussion of a security risk. > > We are using the patch in Samba 2.2.9 in order make a link from smbfs > mounted > /home/user/.gnome -> /tmp/username/.gnome (or somesuch gnomism) > > Does anyone know the status of this in Samba 3? I could not find a > working patch, > so I have disabled the ensure_link_is_safe function in smbd/trans2.c > manually, > by inserting a return 0 before some logic. Since I am not very familiar > with the > code, I am not comfortable with this in our production environment. > This seems to > enable us to do what we want for the time being. (migrate from Win2K DC > / Samba 2.2.9 > exported home directories to Win2K3 ADS / Samba 3.0.4 exported home > directories) > > I would grateful for any advice or information on this matter. Funny how these things go :-). I'm currently working on this exact issue in the Samba 3.0.x codebase - UNIX symlinks will be much better supported in the 3.0.5 release. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've just uploaded a patch to the bug report at ~ https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315 that should fix the winbindd failure people are experiencing in 3.0.4. It fixes things for me here, but i would appreciate some more testing. Let me know how it goes cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAooscIR7qMdg1EfYRAvq8AKCKaCEvgh0SOv/TsI5Jdi1SdJ4bPACfW3fj GFQsQ7/6SkI6uAQ7zocmlDA= =0aiv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Patch for unix extensions
Hi guys, I know Jon Newbigin made a post about this quite a while back http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2002-December/026141.html and there was some discussion of a security risk. We are using the patch in Samba 2.2.9 in order make a link from smbfs mounted /home/user/.gnome -> /tmp/username/.gnome (or somesuch gnomism) Does anyone know the status of this in Samba 3? I could not find a working patch, so I have disabled the ensure_link_is_safe function in smbd/trans2.c manually, by inserting a return 0 before some logic. Since I am not very familiar with the code, I am not comfortable with this in our production environment. This seems to enable us to do what we want for the time being. (migrate from Win2K DC / Samba 2.2.9 exported home directories to Win2K3 ADS / Samba 3.0.4 exported home directories) I would grateful for any advice or information on this matter. Thanks, Rohit -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: How to tunnel Samba via ssh from Windows XP without having to disable local NetBIOS
> This is mentioned in William Mark Smith's instructions on Joe Cheswick's pages (http://research.lumeta.com/ches/cheap/tunnelsolution.html , which I referenced in my initial post) That'll be Bill Cheswick, sorry Bill. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] i cannot find kinit
Kinit is the following location on my system: /usr/kerberos/bin/kinit You can use the locate command to find it. "locate kinit" It is part of the krb5-workstation rpm. If you don't have it installed, install it and re-login to get a new shell. It should then be in your path. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this message that do not relate to official business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by ITS -Original Message- From: Sahibzada Junaid Noor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 3:07 AM To: samba Subject: [Samba] i cannot find kinit the name of my active directory domain is niit.edu.pk so what should i write in this parameter default_relam = YOUR.KERBEROS.REALM also while trying to join the domain i eecute this command kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] My shell gives me the error cannot find kinit. can any one tell me where in my file system can i find kinit Regards = Sahibzada Junaid Noor Ph # (+92) (051) 5950 940 Cell # (+92) (0333) 5223586 Qazi plaza,Third Floor,Commerical Market,Chaklala Scheme 3, Rawalpindi Islamic Republic of Pakistan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2' http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba _ This message was content-scanned by IXC Shield Powered by GatewayDefender - BG0a02801b.0001.mml -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: How to tunnel Samba via ssh from Windows XP without having to disable local NetBIOS
I've been working with Paul Gardiner to try to replicate this solution at least once, and it now officially works for someone else. However, up to now I left out one important step... (sorry) On your MS Loopback adapter, go to "Properties / TCP/IP Properties / Advanced... / WINS" & select "Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP". This is mentioned in William Mark Smith's instructions on Joe Cheswick's pages (http://research.lumeta.com/ches/cheap/tunnelsolution.html , which I referenced in my initial post), but I left it off my own instructions by mistake. Also: netstat -ano tasklist /svc is useful for finding out who has bound which port in Windows. 222.222.222.222:139 should not be bound until you have a tunnel up, at which point it should be bound by your ssh program (and not by System, that is BAD). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] i cannot find kinit
Assuming the name of the server is like server.niit.edu.pk then use the following. If the server name is niit, dropp the niit. default_realm = niit.edu.pk password server = kerberos.niit.edu.pk as for kinit use kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] case sensitive. If that doesn't work, kill winbindd and restart with a level 10 debug and trace where the error is in winbindd.log. Sahibzada Junaid Noor wrote: the name of my active directory domain is niit.edu.pk so what should i write in this parameter default_relam = YOUR.KERBEROS.REALM also while trying to join the domain i eecute this command kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] My shell gives me the error cannot find kinit. can any one tell me where in my file system can i find kinit Regards = Sahibzada Junaid Noor Ph # (+92) (051) 5950 940 Cell # (+92) (0333) 5223586 Qazi plaza,Third Floor,Commerical Market,Chaklala Scheme 3, Rawalpindi Islamic Republic of Pakistan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2' http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How to display the folder names in Japanese?
The C$ stuff is not Japanese share names. All NT partictions (drive letters) have administrative shares that use that notation. C$ is c:\ etc. Try this mount_smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sharename /(some directory on the bsd box you want to mount to), and see what happens. If it errors out you'll have a log file to start backtracking the error. Bull TORS wrote: Hi, I have a FreeBSD-Current and I wanted to access the shares in our Windows NT. What I did: Since I only wanted to Access the only Data Server that we have in our ethernet LAN I tried in kterm the following, #smbutil view //[EMAIL PROTECTED] The result is, ShareType Comment --- NETLOGON disk Logon server share ADMIN$ disk Remote Admin REPL$disk IPC$ pipe Remote IPC C$ disk Default share G$ disk Default share H$ disk Default share As you can see the folder names which are supposed to be in Japanese comes out as C$, G$, H$... My kterm can of course input/display Japanese characters...without any problems... man smbutil does not give me any option how to display the proper characters... Any help, pointers, advice would really be great... Thank you and hoping for your replies... Bull TORS -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows Read Only attribute, and Microsoft Excel.
I have recently started migrating a Win2k fileserver to a Samba 3.0.2a server. Running in full ADS mode, with winbind enabled for authentication against our Win2k PDC. I am also running as much of the ACL support as I can. The problem I am encountering involves excel documents. The documents are migrated from the Win2k server, to the Samba server, and are retaining all of the ACL's during the move. The problem is, if somebody opens the excel document from a windows client (excel 2000), and then saves it, the file is saved (or re-written actually) with changed permissions. The owner is changed to the person who modified the document, which is ok, but the permissons are changed to "470" on the file, and shows up in windows as Read Only to everybody, even if they are part of an ACL that has RWX. If the owner removes the Read Only checkbox in windows, or, if I modify the permissions for the owner to RWX in linux, the file will be "fixed" permanently, even after subsequent edits / changes of owner. It doesn't happen to newly created excel documents, only to the migrated ones. Once the migrated file is "fixed" the problem never comes up again on that file. Can anybody think of whats happening here, or suggest anything I can do about it? I have a few hundred-thousand excel documents to move, so fixing this manually is not an option. Thanks --alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Understanding Samba Shares
I've searched every archive and read the documentation and I still can not figure out how to do this. I've recently installed Debian 3.0 (woody) on a box and have setup Samba on it. I can see it from my WinXP box just fine and I have a user on the Debian box that's the same as my user name and PW on the WinXP box. I can read/write and do everything from my 'Home' share automatically setup by samba and that's working just fine. Where I am dropping the ball is in creating another share that I as normal user can write to. I do my web page work on my WinXP system and want to share the /var/www directory so that I can directly open my php and html files with my editor on the WinXP system and not have to maintain two copies or more, elsewhere and FTP them back and forth. I've setup the share using the examples I've found on the net and I can see the share and even read the files there, but I can not write to them. The /var/www directory is owned by group www-data, of which my normal user on the Debian machine is a member of. I'm completely stuck here, can anyone point me in the write [get it? ;-)] direction so that I can read and write to that shared dir with my WinXP box? Thanks in advance Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] schannel issue on samba 3.0.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Tomczak wrote: | Hi there, | | I've seen a strange thing not reported yet AFAIK. | We have W2K DCs with SP3 with Samba 3.0.2a everything works | fine in regard to winbind, but with Samba 3.0.3 winbind | produces schannel len 24 errors and 'wbinfo -t' and | 'id DOMAIN\userid' doesn't work. Note that wbinfo -u|g works | well and a join was successful as well. I tried to tune my | krb5.conf but in the end I disabled 'client schannel' in | smb.conf. Does anyone know what is going wrong exactly? Is | there a reasonable security risk? Looks like this is bug shows up when the DC doesn't support 128 bit encryption in the NTLMSSP negotiate flags. If you turn on 128 bit encryption, it woks fine. And for the record, the only way I could reproduce this bug was to use a completly unpatched, windows 2000 DC. What service packs, patches, or registry changes have been made to your DC to not support 128 bit encrpytion? Or is the a US vs. non-US service pack issue ? Trying to figure out how to reproduce this against my 2ksp4 DC's. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAolcHIR7qMdg1EfYRAkf+AKC+iYdSvYZMx5NhwsPWCKLjUamUegCfWxOU WrpHWZC+WoE3AgJciMwkIoc= =bEvJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] preexec script problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| hi all
|
| i'm running into a little problem when using preexec scripts for the
creation
| of dir's on my samba server
|
| script
| ---
| #! /bin/sh
| name=`getent passwd | grep %U | awk -F: '{print $5}'`
| mkdir /samba/test/"$name"
| ---
|
| snip of smb.conf
| ---
| [test]
| path = /samba/test
| preexec = /root/script
| browseable = Yes
| writeable = Yes
| valid users = @mygroup
| force group = @mygroup
| create mask = 0770
| force create mode = 770
| ---
|
| anyone have any idea why the dir is not created under "/samba/test" ?
|
Your users don't have permission to run the scrippt /root/script, and/or
they don't have permission to run create files in /samba/test (or both).
You could just do:
public=no
preexec = mkdir /samba/test %U
or, if you don't want arbitrary users to create arbitrary directories in
/samba/test, rather do:
root preexec = mkdir /samba/test/%U && chown %U:%G /samba/test/%U
(it's a waste writing an external script for something that fits into
samba's 256 character limit on configuration entries ...).
Regards,
Buchan
P.S. you should also consider using 'getent passwd $USER' instead of
'getent passwd|grep $USER', the former is faster, will only return one
entry, and won't return any incorrect entries ...
- --
Buchan Milne Senior Support Technician
Obsidian Systems http://www.obsidian.co.za
B.EngRHCE (803004789010797)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAokkVrJK6UGDSBKcRAgEgAJ4+4LzW0UHgQtOpHSo/v30bnEDNRACeNkEK
/BsCDKolQBWb9zxyjkancds=
=HOMD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba compilation OS X
Hi I've tried to compile samba 3.0.4 for OS X (10.2.8) to no avail, I had an Error - an undefined type krb5_krbhst_handle. Now what? And how do I use / install the compiled package?? Your site does not provide any support for OS X nor does it indicate which tar.gz work with it. Thanks in advance Rob (UNIX newbie) * Roberto E. Carletti, lic. iur. Fach 1876 8032 Zurich Switzerland Tel. / Fax +41 (0)1 271 53 08 Mobile +41 (0)76 450 58 13 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Failed to verify ticket ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yohann Ferreira wrote: | Failed to verify incoming ticket! | Here's my krb5.conf : | | [logging] | default = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/krb5libs.log | kdc = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/krb5kdc.log | admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/kadmind.log | | [libdefaults] | ticket_lifetime = 24000 | default_realm = DRAF.FC ... | default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 | default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 | permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 Use either MIT 1.3.x and Heimdal 0.6.1 or later and remove the previous three lines from your krb5.conf cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAoj41IR7qMdg1EfYRAg2DAJwNbP3BBozBUOVlIhkb7v1yuiMUEACgoh2F fhC5GSgjynuVVEPxqcPLOrQ= =s/c6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Logging domain Logon/Logoff
Thanks for your reply. I did this but wasn't happy with the solution. Sure seems to me that this is something that you should be able to log with the samba server. Then there always is the source code Regards, Mike E. > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Novosielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 3:45 AM > To: Michael Eklund > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Samba] Logging domain Logon/Logoff > > > One that you could do is a preexec/postexec type thing. We > did this once before. I believe you could have the pre-exec > be on something like the netlogon share. I can't remember > exactly how we used to do this on our site. Remind me and I > will look it up if this hint does not help. > > _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ > |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX > Systems Admin > |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 > |(2-0922) > \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science > Bldg - C630 > > On Mon, 3 May 2004, Michael Eklund wrote: > > > Has anyone run accross a way to log domain logon/logoffs? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Failed to verify ticket ?
I have found that putting the port numbers after the server names seems to make things
work better.
Example:
[realms]
TESTLAB.LOCAL = {
kdc = ADS.TESTLAB.LOCAL:88
admin_server = ADS.TESTLAB.LOCAL:749
default_domain = TESTLAB.LOCAL
}
[domain_realms]
.testlab.local = TESTLAB.LOCAL
testlab.local = TESTLAB.LOCAL
[appdefaults]
pam = {
debug = false
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = false
}
Good Luck,
Steve Aden
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not
the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to
such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you
should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Opinions,
conclusions and other information contained in this message that do not relate to
official business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by ITS
-Original Message-
From: Yohann Ferreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Failed to verify ticket ?
Hi !
My problem is that :
[2004/05/12 16:07:30, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/05/12 16:07:30, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/05/12 16:07:39, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/05/12 16:07:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(342)
read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2004/05/12 16:07:59, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(887)
saisie-srag (10.143.31.100) closed connection to service tmp
A w2k client can't log on my samba server.
Here's my krb5.conf :
[logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
ticket_lifetime = 24000
default_realm = DRAF.FC
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
#default_tgs_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
#default_tkt_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
#permitted_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = false
kdc_req_checksum_type = 2
checksum_type = 2
ccache_type = 1
forwardable = true
proxiable = true
[realms]
DRAF.FC = {
kdc = draffc3.draf.fc
default_domain = DRAFFCOMTE
}
[domain_realm]
.draf.fc = DRAF.FC
[kdc]
profile = /etc/kerberos/krb5kdc/kdc.conf
[pam]
debug = false
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = false
[appdefaults]
pam = {
debug = true
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = true
afs_cells = draffc3.draf.fc
hosts = draffc3.draf.fc
max_timeout = 30
timeout_shift = 2
initial_timeout = 1
}
[login]
krb4_convert = false
krb4_get_tickets = false
Any idea about my misconfiguration in Kerberos, everyone ?
Please, just answer me for that and I'll let you breath !
Thanks for reading
Bertram
_
Trouvez l'âme soeur sur MSN Rencontres http://g.msn.fr/FR1000/9551
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_
This message was content-scanned by IXC Shield
Powered by GatewayDefender - BG0a047a5d.0001.mml
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
I too have similar problems that haven't been answered. I have kerberos functioning and I can kinit a user on the samba box and access a Windows share, but cannot connect from a Windows workstation to a samba share that has share permissions on it (file permissions are set to 777 for testing). The problem I see in the logs is related to rid's and sid's. The logs (set to level 10) shows the kerberos ticket is decrypted, but later the rid and sid are displayed and do not match the rid and sid of the user connecting to the share. Since they don't match the actual user, they don't match the any of the sid's in the ACL for the share, which then denies access to the share. Same result on 3.0.2a and 3.0.3. I have not yet tried 3.0.4. Maybe you have the same problem. My post: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=1FxIM-8aM-21%40gated-a t.bofh.it&rnum=4&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26q%3DAden%2Bsamba Jerry was kind enough to make a couple of suggestions, but they did not solve the problem. Steve Aden Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this message that do not relate to official business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by ITS -Original Message- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:37 AM To: Anders Berg Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christoph Scheeder Subject: Re: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anders Berg wrote: | Hi Christoph, | | you have come to the wrong group. Not that this | question does not belong here, its just that nobody is | willing to answer it! | | 4 questions so far in May have been about this topic | (mine: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-May/085521.html) , | and many more earlier months. And there are surprisingly | few replys. | | I _don't_ think it's because it's a RTFM question, or is | adressed in such detail so many times that people just can't | be bothered answering it. I think its because they don't wanna | touch it (they meaning the people that have written/worked with | these parts of Samba)! ... | I used both Heimdal 0.6.2 (I have a 2003 server I auth. | gainst, and the Samba docs say that Heimdal must be used with 2003.) | and the MIT 1.3.3 kerbos and both 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 Samba. | | I see that one person has sendt a "Me too" mail in reply | to you already. :) | | Will the real Samba community please stand up?! I'll assume that your not just trolling for an answer. For the record, you will always have better luck with MIT krb5 1.3.x and Heimdal 0.6.1 or later. Both supprt the type 23 enc type used by Windows 200x. There are a couple of likely reasons why you are prompted for a password: (a) the krb5 ticket cannot be verfied (possibly due to an improper kerberos setup on the Samba box) (b) getpwnam() fails for the user (see logs for instances of 'Gwt_Pwnam did not') If you can connect to the share using the server's IP address but IP address, this is indicative of a krb5 configuration error somewhere. When usiong the IP address, the client will revert to the NTLMSSP mechanism during session setup (rather than sending a krb5 ticket). cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAoiiBIR7qMdg1EfYRAqEfAKDUJcAixHjuvoZE4vGL1YYk4oMLXgCgofYP dSNA4Je5YQ0MIiY6dTeHyS0= =mqvS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba _ This message was content-scanned by IXC Shield Powered by GatewayDefender - BH09f02c59.0001.mml -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with Win2k Group Policy with Samba 3.0.2 PDC
Hi, I am having an annoying problem with adding a group policy to a Samba 3.0.2 PDC domain, running ona Suse 9 box with Win2k client machines. Using 'poledit' from Windows 2000 server, I can add a user or computer policy for an individual user or computer, and this will work when placed in my [netlogon] directory, but if I try to create a group policy, by using 'Add Group', then amending the properties, this group policy is ignored when I login on a client machine. This does not appear to work for any groups (Domain User, Domain Admin or my created group 'Students', which is mapped to the unixgroup 'students'). All my groups appear in the poledit 'Browse' window, and 'smbstatus' shows a member of 'students' has indeed logged in. Any idea what may be wrong? Is this something I cannot do in Samba 3 with a Win2k client? Cheers, -- Alistair James Engineering Computing Support Group University of Oxford -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Failed to verify ticket ?
Hi !
My problem is that :
[2004/05/12 16:07:30, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/05/12 16:07:30, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/05/12 16:07:39, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/05/12 16:07:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(342)
read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2004/05/12 16:07:59, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(887)
saisie-srag (10.143.31.100) closed connection to service tmp
A w2k client can't log on my samba server.
Here's my krb5.conf :
[logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kerberos/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
ticket_lifetime = 24000
default_realm = DRAF.FC
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5
#default_tgs_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
#default_tkt_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
#permitted_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1 des-cbc-crc
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = false
kdc_req_checksum_type = 2
checksum_type = 2
ccache_type = 1
forwardable = true
proxiable = true
[realms]
DRAF.FC = {
kdc = draffc3.draf.fc
default_domain = DRAFFCOMTE
}
[domain_realm]
.draf.fc = DRAF.FC
[kdc]
profile = /etc/kerberos/krb5kdc/kdc.conf
[pam]
debug = false
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = false
[appdefaults]
pam = {
debug = true
ticket_lifetime = 36000
renew_lifetime = 36000
forwardable = true
krb4_convert = true
afs_cells = draffc3.draf.fc
hosts = draffc3.draf.fc
max_timeout = 30
timeout_shift = 2
initial_timeout = 1
}
[login]
krb4_convert = false
krb4_get_tickets = false
Any idea about my misconfiguration in Kerberos, everyone ?
Please, just answer me for that and I'll let you breath !
Thanks for reading
Bertram
_
Trouvez l'âme soeur sur MSN Rencontres http://g.msn.fr/FR1000/9551
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba master problems
HI, I have been experiencing problems for the last few days. One of our systems rebooted itself, and for some reason became the Master on our Samba network. This resulted in the loss of the workgroup when going through network neirgbourhood/my network places etc. I restarted samba on our serversleaving the 'master' system off thenetwork. Now when I run smbclient there is no master defined. In the log.nmb there is this error -process_get_backup_list_request: Cannot find workgroup RUWPA on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET Everything seems to be working fine apart from this... using run then //ruwpa-space works fine...and users with the drives attached previously are ok. Any pointers would be gratefully received. Phil. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Permissions 101
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Booher wrote: | Hello. I have a Security = share | My wife is only able to get read permissions to | this directory, she is a member of | Myserver\myadmins, but that doesn't seem to help. | I am new to this and very confused. Can anyone help? I | have, of course, added the users to the smbpasswd. I would recommend that you use security = user. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAoilhIR7qMdg1EfYRAjDeAJoDYkRART50G41gFg33xH8CpPpffQCg5eX7 wVQF+f8qHHYzngjuH/ujbJY= =azr6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anders Berg wrote: | Hi Christoph, | | you have come to the wrong group. Not that this | question does not belong here, its just that nobody is | willing to answer it! | | 4 questions so far in May have been about this topic | (mine: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-May/085521.html) , | and many more earlier months. And there are surprisingly | few replys. | | I _don't_ think it's because it's a RTFM question, or is | adressed in such detail so many times that people just can't | be bothered answering it. I think its because they don't wanna | touch it (they meaning the people that have written/worked with | these parts of Samba)! ... | I used both Heimdal 0.6.2 (I have a 2003 server I auth. | gainst, and the Samba docs say that Heimdal must be used with 2003.) | and the MIT 1.3.3 kerbos and both 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 Samba. | | I see that one person has sendt a "Me too" mail in reply | to you already. :) | | Will the real Samba community please stand up?! I'll assume that your not just trolling for an answer. For the record, you will always have better luck with MIT krb5 1.3.x and Heimdal 0.6.1 or later. Both supprt the type 23 enc type used by Windows 200x. There are a couple of likely reasons why you are prompted for a password: (a) the krb5 ticket cannot be verfied (possibly due to an improper kerberos setup on the Samba box) (b) getpwnam() fails for the user (see logs for instances of 'Gwt_Pwnam did not') If you can connect to the share using the server's IP address but IP address, this is indicative of a krb5 configuration error somewhere. When usiong the IP address, the client will revert to the NTLMSSP mechanism during session setup (rather than sending a krb5 ticket). cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAoiiBIR7qMdg1EfYRAqEfAKDUJcAixHjuvoZE4vGL1YYk4oMLXgCgofYP dSNA4Je5YQ0MIiY6dTeHyS0= =mqvS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] HP-UX 11i and Inability to run Samba 3.0.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Novosielski wrote: | Thanks a lot -- I've been trying to get our machines upgraded | to 3.0.x lately, and I have been running into that | buffer error and this PANIC over and over. The funny thing | is it SEEMS to work OK (and a fair amount faster | than 2.2.x) and then under a moderate load, the whole | thing starts to flake out and become unresponsive, | slow, and unreliable -- often remedied by a restart to an | extent. A fellow staff member actually cron'd a | stop/start at 15 minute intervals to attempt to limp along. | | I would be happy to provide any testing assistance that I | can. We have gotten a lot out of Samba and would certainly | be willing to help give back. Thanks Ryan, If you could send me a level 10 debug log surround thing crash, that would be a start. I think this is just a byte ordering bug similar to the one that was fixed in the printing code a couple of months ago. cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAoib9IR7qMdg1EfYRAiWTAJ43ppSloDyK7k1NIYFp873JDiz7MgCgyyVw VJkzy0S8pxHBiYtxvnnrZS8= =BX5c -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SID History Mechanism / Trust Accounts
Hello everybody, 1. Question When migration from an nt4 style domain to a new samba 3 style domain with ldapsam , it is necessary to preserve the old SIDs of the user to keep the users in touch with the old servers. M$ calles this SID history, which means that the old SID is added to new accounts in an AD. Does samba have any equal mechanism? 2. Question Does net rpc vampire preserve domain trust accounts? Regards D.Laurenz Mit freundlichem Gruß, Dirk Laurenz Systems Engineer PSO - Professional Service Organisation Fujitsu Siemens Computers Hildesheimer Strasse 25 30880 Laatzen Germany Telephone: +49 (511) 84 89 - 18 08 Telefax:+49 (511) 84 89 - 25 18 08 Mobile: +49 (170) 22 10 781 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com http://www.fujitsu-siemens.de/rl/servicesupport/itdienstleistungen/competencecenter.html *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How to display the folder names in Japanese?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bull TORS wrote: | Hi, | | I have a FreeBSD-Current and I wanted to access the shares in our Windows NT. | What I did: | Since I only wanted to Access the only Data Server that we have in our | ethernet LAN I tried in kterm the following, | #smbutil view //[EMAIL PROTECTED] smbutil is not part of Samba. It is maintained separately by the FreeDSB developers. cheers, jerry - -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." --- Sting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAoiQSIR7qMdg1EfYRAiJ/AJ47YtUxjc/j6FB8vS39ixZ8or1O5gCgnxW0 EXYqaQRSuEk1b8MKFGNqqKo= =cNNL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
Too bad, it's not working for me... But no problem, I'll try the next samba versions until it matchs ! Rock isn't over, Samba Team ! (And will never be !) Bertram From: Anders Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Christoph Scheeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 11:40:29 +0200 Hi Christoph, you have come to the wrong group. Not that this question does not belong here, its just that nobody is willing to answer it! 4 questions so far in May have been about this topic (mine: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-May/085521.html) , and many more earlier months. And there are surprisingly few replys. I _don't_ think it's because it's a RTFM question, or is adressed in such detail so many times that people just can't be bothered answering it. I think its because they don't wanna touch it (they meaning the people that have written/worked with these parts of Samba)! The best reference I have been able to find so far, in my 6 day quest, to do the same thing as you want to do is: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=161506 But this did not work for me... Though it is apperently working for some. Some go so far as to say thet samba can't do what you want we want it to do in our case. I used both Heimdal 0.6.2 (I have a 2003 server I auth. against, and the Samba docs say that Heimdal must be used with 2003.) and the MIT 1.3.3 kerbos and both 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 Samba. I see that one person has sendt a "Me too" mail in reply to you already. :) Will the real Samba community please stand up?! YS Anders Berg At 10:37 12.05.2004 +0200, Christoph Scheeder wrote: Hi, my Situation: a w2k-server set in mixed mode as ADS-Server,a debian machine with latest stable samba compiled self with ADS-support. samba machine joined to ADS-Domain succesfully, winbindd installed and configured, all w2k users and groups visible on samba-server. Browsing and connecting to w2k-server and samba-server from the samba server with smbclient and -k option works fine for all accounts in the w2k-domain and the localy on the samba server defined users. If i try to access the samba server from a w2k-client in the domain i get a prompt for user and password. If i supply a domain-account i get a failure, if i supply a local samba-server-account all works fine. Where should i look to solve this problem? C.Scheeder -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba * Denne fotnoten bekrefter at denne e-postmeldingen ble skannet av MailSweeper og funnet fri for virus. * This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses. * -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba _ Hotmail : un compte GRATUIT qui vous suit partout et tout le temps ! http://g.msn.fr/FR1000/9493 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ezmlm response
¡Hola! Soy el programa ezmlm. Me ocupo de la lista de correo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Estoy trabajando para mi propietario, a quien se puede localizar en [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aquí hay una lista de las direcciones comando disponibles: Mande un correo a las siguientes direcciones-comando para obtener información y FAQ de esta lista: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para recibir los mensajes desde el número 123 al 145 (con un máximo de 100 por petición), escriba a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para obtener un índice con los campos "Asunto" y "Autor" para los mensajes del 123 al 456, debe escribir a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para recibir todos los mensajes con el mismo "Asunto" que el mensaje 12345, mande un mensaje en blanco a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> En realidad no es necesario que los mensajes estén en blanco, pero si no lo están ignoraré su contenido. Sólo es importante la DIRECCIÓN a la que se envía. Usted puede suscribir una dirección alternativa, por ejemplo, para "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", simplemente añada un guión y su dirección (con '=' en lugar de '@') después del comando: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para cancelar la suscripción de esta dirección, escriba a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Comandos administrativos para la lista suse-linux-s --- Puedo gestionar automáticamente peticiones administrativas. Por favor, no envíe este tipo de peticiones a la lista. Envíelas a la dirección-comando adecuada: Para obtener ayuda y una descripción de los comandos disponibles, mande un mensaje a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para suscribirse a la lista, mande un mensaje a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para eliminar su dirección de la lista, simplemente mande un mensaje a la dirección que hay en la cabecera ``List-Unsubscribe'' de cualquier mensaje de la lista. Si usted no ha cambiado su dirección desde que se suscribió, también puede enviar un mensaje a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para añadir o eliminar direcciones, le enviaré un mensaje de confirmación a esa dirección. Cuando lo reciba, pulse el botón 'Responder' para completar la transacción. Si necesita contactar con el propietario de la lista, por favor, mande un mensaje a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Por favor, incluya una lista de mensajes REENVIADOS con TODAS LAS CABECERAS intactas para que sea más fácil ayudarle. --- Le adjunto una copia de la petición que he recibido. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (qmail 3474 invoked from network); 12 May 2004 12:30:04 - Received: from unknown (HELO hermes.suse.de) (195.135.221.8) by 0 with SMTP; 12 May 2004 12:30:04 - Received: from scanhost.suse.de (scanhost.suse.de [10.0.0.5]) by hermes.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3CB68D80 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by scanhost.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 0) id 52A7855629; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: virus-quarantine X-Quarantine-id: Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C53C68F51 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:26:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kerberos.suse.cz (ns.suse.cz [82.208.2.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A9D596C0C for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from suse.com (181.Red-80-32-57.pooles.rima-tde.net [80.32.57.181]) by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE CR ESMTP Mailer) with ESMTP id 8357F4FBD9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:26:06 +0200 (MEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is that your password? Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:26:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-AMaViS-Alert: INFECTED, message contains virus: Worm.SomeFool.P X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 1.1d X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Can you confirm it? [the SUSE virus scanner removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of part6.zip] [if you need the message in its original form including all attachments, please ask the SENDER for a version free of viruses] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] preexec script problem
> i'm running into a little problem when using preexec scripts for the
> creation
> of dir's on my samba server
>
> script
> ---
> #! /bin/sh
> name=`getent passwd | grep %U | awk -F: '{print $5}'`
> mkdir /samba/test/"$name"
> ---
>
> snip of smb.conf
> ---
> [test]
> path = /samba/test
> preexec = /root/script
> browseable = Yes
> writeable = Yes
> valid users = @mygroup
> force group = @mygroup
> create mask = 0770
> force create mode = 770
> ---
>
> anyone have any idea why the dir is not created under "/samba/test" ?
>
> -ipuy
%U will be substituted within smb.conf, not your script. You could do
something like preexec = /root/script %U in smb.conf, and then
name=`getent passwd | grep $1 ...
Will your users be able to create directories in /samba/test/ (this dir
is group writable and owned by group mygroup?). Is it your intention
that one user will be able to read/write/delete another user's files?
~ Daniel
---
This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be
legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use
of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or
otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be
viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information
herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Poor performance with Mac OS X Panther clients
Hi Nathan, all I can say is we are also testing Mac OS X with Samba (on Solaris) and with slightly more typical numbers of files per directory are not seeing any simliar issues. In principal it does not surprise me that it is much slower on your OS X client than on your Linux or Windows clients. When you open a folder in your Linux or Windows file browser all they will need to do is request a file listing. On the other hand an OS X client will read the resourse fork (meta data) for each file to give it the correct application association and icon in the finder. Does your customer not see a similar problem when the files are stored on a Windows file server? I would expect they would (that is if they are mounting from the Windows server over SMB not AFP which may prove quicker). no answer but hope this helps, thanks Andy. Here's my setup: - Single Mac OS X Panther client w/ latest patches. - Single Windows NT4 w/ latest SPs client. - Debian stable Samba server(2.2.3a-13) w/ custom 2.4.26 kernel. Oplocks enabled. - Cisco 2950 - All nodes 100Mb and everything on the same switch. - HP DL360 w/ 2.8GHz hyper-threaded processor and 1GB of memory. - HP MSA1000 SAN. - XFS filesystems w/ ACL support. My client is moving their data over to a fail-over Samba setup backended with the HP SAN. They have several directories with approx. 5000 to 1 files. The files were moved into the directories on the new file server from a Mac OS X client in order to preserve the Mac OS metadata. Viewing these directories from explorer.exe on the Windows client, from the Terminal on OSX using ls, and from a Linux laptop using smbclient and ls is stellar. Very quick. Viewing these directories from within the OSX Finder causes the smbd process to spike to approx. 45% to 55% and stay there for approx. 10 seconds or however long it takes the Finder to render all of the icons for the files in the directory. Scrolling the Finder while the icons are being rendered causes the CPU to jump again. Depending on how many screens you scroll through in Finder, you can cause smbd to jump to 99% and stay there for several minutes. We are still in pre-deployment but the CPU spike is making the client nervous about what will happen when we start to load many Mac OS X client onto the server. I'm not an expert on the SMB protocol but I've captured packet dumps from a fresh share mount and directory view from both the Windows NT4 client and the Mac OS X client and it looks to me like the NT4 client is doing the directory contents lookups with a single "FIND_FIRST2, \*" and a corresponding return packet from the server with the listing of the directory contents whereas the Mac OS X Finder client appears to be doing a FIND_FIRST2 call for every file, including metadata files, in the directory. This would seem to be supported by a strace of the smbd process which shows tons and tons of getdents32 calls. My gut says that this is a problem with OSX's Finder and not Samba but, understandably, my client doesn't care...they just want it fixed. Is there a known work-around for the performance issue with Mac OS X Finder clients? Do I need to tweak something on the server? On the client? I've search the Samba archives and not found much mention of this issue and I've Googled around for information from Apple's end and drawn a blank there too. Thanks ahead of time for any insight that you can provide. -- Nathan R. Valentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
Hi Christoph, you have come to the wrong group. Not that this question does not belong here, its just that nobody is willing to answer it! 4 questions so far in May have been about this topic (mine: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-May/085521.html) , and many more earlier months. And there are surprisingly few replys. I _don't_ think it's because it's a RTFM question, or is adressed in such detail so many times that people just can't be bothered answering it. I think its because they don't wanna touch it (they meaning the people that have written/worked with these parts of Samba)! The best reference I have been able to find so far, in my 6 day quest, to do the same thing as you want to do is: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=161506 But this did not work for me... Though it is apperently working for some. Some go so far as to say thet samba can't do what you want we want it to do in our case. I used both Heimdal 0.6.2 (I have a 2003 server I auth. against, and the Samba docs say that Heimdal must be used with 2003.) and the MIT 1.3.3 kerbos and both 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 Samba. I see that one person has sendt a "Me too" mail in reply to you already. :) Will the real Samba community please stand up?! YS Anders Berg At 10:37 12.05.2004 +0200, Christoph Scheeder wrote: Hi, my Situation: a w2k-server set in mixed mode as ADS-Server,a debian machine with latest stable samba compiled self with ADS-support. samba machine joined to ADS-Domain succesfully, winbindd installed and configured, all w2k users and groups visible on samba-server. Browsing and connecting to w2k-server and samba-server from the samba server with smbclient and -k option works fine for all accounts in the w2k-domain and the localy on the samba server defined users. If i try to access the samba server from a w2k-client in the domain i get a prompt for user and password. If i supply a domain-account i get a failure, if i supply a local samba-server-account all works fine. Where should i look to solve this problem? C.Scheeder -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba * Denne fotnoten bekrefter at denne e-postmeldingen ble skannet av MailSweeper og funnet fri for virus. * This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses. * -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
Hi ! I'm having the same problem when I want to access my shares on the samba ADS member server. I, too, have successfully joined the domain and I can log on the domain using a 2000 user account from the samba itself. But as for you, I am prompted for a user and pass when accessing my shares from a 2000 client in the network neighborhood. Be strong, we are two in this mess... Thanks for reading Bertram From: Christoph Scheeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:37:51 +0200 Hi, my Situation: a w2k-server set in mixed mode as ADS-Server,a debian machine with latest stable samba compiled self with ADS-support. samba machine joined to ADS-Domain succesfully, winbindd installed and configured, all w2k users and groups visible on samba-server. Browsing and connecting to w2k-server and samba-server from the samba server with smbclient and -k option works fine for all accounts in the w2k-domain and the localy on the samba server defined users. If i try to access the samba server from a w2k-client in the domain i get a prompt for user and password. If i supply a domain-account i get a failure, if i supply a local samba-server-account all works fine. Where should i look to solve this problem? C.Scheeder -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba _ MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous ! http://search.msn.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbd log meesages
I see the same thing. Anyone know what they are? (of course I have other issues, but that's another story) _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Mon, 10 May 2004, Mark wrote: > Can someone please explain what these messages mean. I am running 3.0.2a > with no issues at all. I just happened to be looking through the logs > and notice the messages. > > > [2004/05/10 03:53:23, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1371) >failed to decode PDU > [2004/05/10 03:53:23, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) >process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP profiles problem - Samba 3.0.3 & LDAP
Disregard that -- I misunderstood you; I thought you were using the domain admin param in smb.conf. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Tue, 4 May 2004, John Arthur wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] profiles]# ls -la > total 16 > drwxr-xrwt4 root Domain Admins 4096 May 4 13:03 . > drwxr-xr-x4 root Domain Admins 4096 May 4 10:05 .. > drwx-- 13 debraDomain Users 4096 May 4 12:52 debra > drwx-- 14 root Domain Users 4096 May 4 13:14 john > > As you can see Debra's profile is created with the correct ownership(?) but > John's is created as owner "Administrator/root". > > Now the only difference is that John is a Member of "Domain Admins" although > both john & debra's primary group is 513 "Domain Users" > > > [profiles] > # chmod 1757 /domain/profiles > path = /domain/profiles > csc policy = disable > profile acls = yes > writeable = yes > browseable = no > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > > The next issue is unless I set the policy "Do not check check for user > ownership of Roaming profile folders" to 'enabled' ie no checking. Debra can > not access her remote profile (even though she is the owner) while john can > access his. > > Can anybody shed some light on this issue. > > Regards John > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP profiles problem - Samba 3.0.3 & LDAP
Domain Admins, AFAIK, perform all actions as root. You can verify this in smb.conf. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Tue, 4 May 2004, John Arthur wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] profiles]# ls -la > total 16 > drwxr-xrwt4 root Domain Admins 4096 May 4 13:03 . > drwxr-xr-x4 root Domain Admins 4096 May 4 10:05 .. > drwx-- 13 debraDomain Users 4096 May 4 12:52 debra > drwx-- 14 root Domain Users 4096 May 4 13:14 john > > As you can see Debra's profile is created with the correct ownership(?) but > John's is created as owner "Administrator/root". > > Now the only difference is that John is a Member of "Domain Admins" although > both john & debra's primary group is 513 "Domain Users" > > > [profiles] > # chmod 1757 /domain/profiles > path = /domain/profiles > csc policy = disable > profile acls = yes > writeable = yes > browseable = no > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > > The next issue is unless I set the policy "Do not check check for user > ownership of Roaming profile folders" to 'enabled' ie no checking. Debra can > not access her remote profile (even though she is the owner) while john can > access his. > > Can anybody shed some light on this issue. > > Regards John > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Logging domain Logon/Logoff
One that you could do is a preexec/postexec type thing. We did this once before. I believe you could have the pre-exec be on something like the netlogon share. I can't remember exactly how we used to do this on our site. Remind me and I will look it up if this hint does not help. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Mon, 3 May 2004, Michael Eklund wrote: > Has anyone run accross a way to log domain logon/logoffs? > > Thanks, > > Mike > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] starnge Auth problem in w2k Domain with ADS
Hi, my Situation: a w2k-server set in mixed mode as ADS-Server,a debian machine with latest stable samba compiled self with ADS-support. samba machine joined to ADS-Domain succesfully, winbindd installed and configured, all w2k users and groups visible on samba-server. Browsing and connecting to w2k-server and samba-server from the samba server with smbclient and -k option works fine for all accounts in the w2k-domain and the localy on the samba server defined users. If i try to access the samba server from a w2k-client in the domain i get a prompt for user and password. If i supply a domain-account i get a failure, if i supply a local samba-server-account all works fine. Where should i look to solve this problem? C.Scheeder -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can I reconfigure Samba share without restart smb service?
I read somewhere that Samba re-reads its config file every minute or so. I think one of my servers (2.2.0a) does this but the other (2.2.8a) seems to take longer. - Original Message - From: "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ww m-pubsyssamba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:23 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Can I reconfigure Samba share without restart smb service? > AFAIK, Samba will notice a change on its own as well. > > _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ > |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin > |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) > \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 > > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote: > > > Everytime I add or remove some samba shares, I must restart smb service to take effect. Is there anyway to reconfig it without restart? > > > > > > >> Yes there is, you must "kill -HUP" your parent smbd process, either work out which pid it is from running ps -aef (-aux or whatever > > for your UNIX platform) or cat /sambainstalldir/var/locks/smbd.pid file which contains the PID, then "kill -HUP YourPID" > > For already established client connections they may not see the changes until they disconnect but for new connections your > > smb.conf/share changes will be visable, > > > > cheers Andy. > > > > << > > > > BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > > > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically > > stated. > > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in > > reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.680 / Virus Database: 442 - Release Date: 10/05/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] [error]
Your mail [subject: 0i09u5rug08r89589gjrg] (B (BBAD TYPE!! (B (B-- (BTo unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the (Binstructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] remove machine account
This works for me. If need be, remove the account by hand if you are using smbpasswd as your backend. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, James Amen Atayi wrote: > Hallo! > > How please to remove a win2k machine account. > I tried smbpasswd -x machine$ without succes. > > The thing is that I changed the machine domaine to workgroup. And > now I'm trying to put again the machine in the domaine but that > can't be done. > I'm getting an error message that the logon informations are in > conflict with existing logon informations. > > Thank a lot for helping > > James > > > > > > > http://www.epost.de - das Kommunikationsportal der Deutschen Post > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WINS / port 445 question
Some information about Windows Direct Hosting (port 445) can be found at: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q204279 Here you will see that, by disabling port 445 (direct hosting), all traffic reverts back to NBT. >From what I can see, Direct Hosting is no more than SMB over TCP/IP, instead of using NBT (NetBIOS over TCP) as an intermediary transport. Blocking Direct Hosting should not break anything (it is merely a 'short-cut') but, once it gets implemented, it should reduce overhead on server and network. Kit -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] problem conpiling snprintf.c
FWIW, you did not provide a version number of Samba. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Cawley, Michele (3598) wrote: > >From Michele Cawley > problem: tring to install on a HPUX v11 system. make install comming back > with below error. > > > Using LIBS = -lgen -lsec -lnsl > Compiling lib/snprintf.c > lib/snprintf.c:792: conflicting types for `snprintf' > /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00/3.1/include/stdio.h:493: > previous d > eclaration of `snprintf' > *** Error exit code 1 > > Stop. > > > regards > > Michele > > > > Please note as of 31st March 2004 we will not be accepting any email to > Digifone.com addresses. From this date please send all emails to O2.com. > This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files > transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying > of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have > received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. > > * > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.3: Still cant change password after KB828741
I'm prety sure this was fixed in 3.0.4, not 3.0.3. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Brandon Turner wrote: > I just downloaded and installed Samba 3.0.3 and it still doesn't fix the > problem caused by the windows update discussed in KB828741. Still > getting the message "You do not have permission to change your password" > on some boxes, or "The system cannot change your password because the > domain DOMAIN is not available" on others. Uninstalling the update > still works, however this is not an option for some, including us. > > Could someone please help to resolve this? Anyone know of a patch? I > can't afford to wait until the next Samba release. > > Thanks, > Brandon > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Windows XP Pro and Samba (file saving)
U, is it just me or did you not ask a question? _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Sun, 9 May 2004, Jason Oakley wrote: > No ideas then anyone? > --- > > Couldn't get the password sync to work with the unix passwords, so created > them by hand. > > Logon script: > C:\Windows\logon.bat > > @Echo off > \\spooty\waulok\logon.bat > > > $ cat logon.bat > @Echo off > if not exist s: net use s: \\spooty\shared > if not exist m: net use m: \\spooty\mp3z > if not exist u: net use u: \\spooty\waulok > if not exist w: net use w: \\spooty\webcam > net time \\spooty /set /yes > > > # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the > # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed > # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too > # many!) most of which are not shown in this example > # > # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) > # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # > # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you > # may wish to enable > # > # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" > # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. > # > #=== Global Settings = > [global] > > # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4 > workgroup = thematrix > > # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field > server string = Inside The Matrix > netbios name = spooty > > nt acl support = no > > # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict > # connections to machines which are on your local network. The > # following example restricts access to two C class networks and > # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see > # the smb.conf man page > ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. > hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127. > > # If you want to automatically load your printer list rather > # than setting them up individually then you'll need this > load printers = yes > > # you may wish to override the location of the printcap file > ; printcap name = /etc/printcap > > # on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow > # you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool > # system > ; printcap name = lpstat > > # It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless > # it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: > # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx > ; printing = bsd > > # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd > # otherwise the user "nobody" is used > ; guest account = pcguest > > # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine > # that connects > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > syslog = 0 > # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). > max log size = 50 > > # Some tweaks to speed it up (hopefully) > getwd cache = yes > read raw = no > log level = 1 > write raw = no > case sensitive = no > preserve case = yes > short preserve case = yes > mangled names = no > > > > # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See > # security_level.txt for details. > security = user > > # Use password server option only with security = server > # The argument list may include: > # password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] > # or to auto-locate the domain controller/s > # password server = * > ; password server = > > # Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of "domain controller" > # This option is no longer implemented. > > # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read > # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. > # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents >encrypt passwords = yes > update encrypted = yes > unix password sync = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd > > # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration > # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name > # of the machine that is connecting > ; include = /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.%m > > # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. > # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details > # You may want to add the following on a Linux system: > # SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces > # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them > # here. See the man page for details. > ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 > interfaces = 192.168.0.2 > > # Browser Control Options: > #
Re: [Samba] Can I reconfigure Samba share without restart smb service?
AFAIK, Samba will notice a change on its own as well. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote: > Everytime I add or remove some samba shares, I must restart smb service to take > effect. Is there anyway to reconfig it without restart? > > > >> Yes there is, you must "kill -HUP" your parent smbd process, either work out > >> which pid it is from running ps -aef (-aux or whatever > for your UNIX platform) or cat /sambainstalldir/var/locks/smbd.pid file which > contains the PID, then "kill -HUP YourPID" > For already established client connections they may not see the changes until they > disconnect but for new connections your > smb.conf/share changes will be visable, > > cheers Andy. > > << > > BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views > which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically > stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, > copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in > reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors > e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows printer drivers and Samba
Read the printing chapter in the Samba HOWTO. It is very well written and it would be a shame if you didn't take the time to read it. ;) _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > Sorry ain't been on the list for a while...but I've lost all my archived > mails and need to get the following done on both 2.2.8a and 3.0.2: > > * Printer is on linux box > * Need to have drivers for Windows on linux box > * Need to have Windows machines able to get drivers from linux box > > I recall there was some way to get this done - or have I drank too much > beer? > > stephen kuhn - owner > == > illawarra computer services > a kuhn media australia company > http://kma.0catch.com > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] humble plea - once more
Not true. Use "update encrypted = yes" or PAM_smbpass. That's what I did. Works great. You don't get DIRECTLY to LDAP that way, but you do get the passwords hashed from UNIX. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > Asked this question with absolutely no response - seems it's a high > > volume list ;-) > > This has been answered many times. > > > Is there no way for unix crypt password -> ntPassword conversion ? > > No. > > > Just too strange - someone must have met the problem of moving > > existing unix users to NT domain before. > > Yep. You make everyone change their password. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Yet Another LDAP Question
What you CAN do is use PAM_smbpass, with the migrate flag, and migrate all
of the UNIX passwords this way. This way, when a user logs in via UNIX or
Samba, their password makes it into the Samba password file. You never
actually have to turn on password encryption via smbpasswd, 'far as I
know, but this will give you a list of NT hashes to work with to then
convert.
Does this help at all?
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Michal Kurowski wrote:
> Paul Gienger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I believe the README is out of date. Their website says that something
> > like .80 and up work on 3.x. I have used .84 to populate a 3.0.2 server
> > just fine making only configuration changes like server locations,
> > containers, and domain SID. I did have to hack one script for my
> > purposes, but that was only because my primary ldap server is over a
> > greater-latency-than-local-lan link and replication takes a couple seconds.
> >
>
> It relates to my last question: is there any way to for unix->NT
> password conversion ?
>
> I need to create ntAccounts from my shadow passwords (crypt-ed) in the
> Ldap server. It seems there's no supported way but two problems emerge
> in here:
>
> 1) you have to ask lots of people to type their passwords again
> 2) you have no control maintain same password policy
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Michal Kurowski
> perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{>: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#;
> y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print'
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbldap: odd ownership of un-tarred files
tar files hold onto the UID/GID that owned the files upon tarring. Samba always untar's on my systems as UID 783, presumably because someone (but WHO?) who puts together the Samba packages is UID 783 on the system on which the tar's are built. Unless you are answering a more complicated question that I can't seem to grasp at the moment, in which case, forgive me. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Bill Gurley wrote: > I've just been setting up a new server with RHEL 3, samba 3 with LDAP > authentication and using the smbldap-tools ver. 0.8.4. I've finally got > things working, but just noticed something odd. > > I have so far only created myself as a user, with uid=1000 and gid=513. > > As root, I obtained the latest gzip file for squirrelmail and untar'd > it. The odd thing is that the directory created by un-taring this file > is owned as follows: > > drwxr-sr-x 16 gurley 1000 4096 Oct 1 2003 squirrelmail-1.4.2 > > I tried unzipping other random gz files and find that they acquire > random ownerships above 1000, instead of the expected root.root! > > What's going on? Have I messed something up? > > > -Bill- > > - > Bill Gurley, Technical Director | > Department of Chemistry |Consider Linux and > Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville|Open Source Software! > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help! - need to Start multiple samba smbd/nmbd daemons
My best guess is that you have the ability to set the lock directory for the two different smbd/nmbd's, either within smb.conf, on the command line, or either one. I don't know if you thought of this already, but that's what it seems like to me. Check smb.conf's man page to see if this is possible. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Dignard, Norman wrote: > We're trying to dual home samba onto 2 windows domains. We're created 2 separate > smb.conf files each having it's own domain specific info. The only differences > between them are > - different workgroups > - different interfaces to bind too > - different socket addressees (matches the interface) > - and different WINS server IPs. > > We are using the security = domain model. > > We've successfully joined each domain by swapping in the applicable smb.conf file > and then running the smbpasswd command to join the domain .. both came back > successful. > > Now we're trying to start the smbd and nmbd daemons by using the -s switch to bind > each daemon to a specific interface by pointing to the applicable smb.conf file > (ie. /opt/samba/bin/nmbd -D -s /etc/opt/samba/smb.conf.engdev) however it looks > like we can only start one smbd or nmbd daemon at a time as only one .pid lock file > is allowed. > Ref smbd log file output: > [2004/04/23 12:35:57, 0] smbd/server.c:(793) > smbd version 2.2.8a based HP CIFS Server A.01.10 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002 > [2004/04/23 12:35:57, 0] lib/pidfile.c:(85) > ERROR: smbd is already running. File /var/opt/samba/locks/smbd.pid exists and > process id 25569 is running. > > Is there a way to start multiple smbd/nmbd daemons so that we can multi-home samba? > > Any help appreciated > Regards > Norman Dignard > > Nav Canada Technical Systems Center > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Browse lists & 3.0.x
Jonathan Johnson wrote: Make sure they are all in the same workgroup or domain. If some are in a domain and some are in a workgroup, give the domain and workgroup the same name. Without going into a technical explanation of the difference between domains and workgroups, suffice to say that if they have the same name, your life will be easier. I was advised only a week ago by the guy setting up our new server that we should not do this, so the new domain set up has a different name to any of the workgroups. He said we would have lots of problems if the domain has the same name as a workgroup. Do you have any pointers to where I can find out about these issues ? This is with Samba 2.2.5-suse, part of their SLOX package - I'm 'in discussions' with them about the issues of changing it to Samba 3. Simon -- Simon Hobson, Technology Specialist Colony Gift Corporation Limited Lindal in Furness, Ulverston, Cumbria, LA12 0LD Tel 01229 461100, Fax 01229 461101 Registered in England No. 1499611 Regd. Office : 100 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6JA. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID
Oooh, this one sounds like profile acls or something like that? I don't have it in front of me, but take a look for acl and profile in the man page for smb.conf. _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Mac wrote: > > > >> > >>The searching I've done so far suggests that I might be able to workaround this > >>with:- > >> > >>nt acl support = no > >> > > That hasn't helped. So I'm still getting:- > > [2004/04/23 12:42:13, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705) > dltest2 (212.219.217.98) connect to service profiles initially as user jsmith > (uid=1935, gid=100) (pid 12038) > [2004/04/23 12:42:13, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(1380) > create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID > S-1-5-21-973294077-3660535-3933214913-4632 to uid or gid. > > > accompanied by :- > > > Windows did not load your roaming profile and is attempting > to log you on with your local profile. Changes to the profile > will not be copied to the server when you logoff. Windows did > not load your profile because a server copy of the profile folder > already exists that does not have the correct security. Either the > current user or the Administrator's group must be the owner of the > folder. Contact your network administrator. > > > on the Windows XP Pro client. > > Any suggestions? > > > >Mac > Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Work: +44 1707 641565 Everything else: +44 7956 237670 (anytime) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Does the PDC needs a "Machine Account" in its domain ?
No. What would it need that for? _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Raul Chirea wrote: > Does the PDC needs a "Machine Account" in its domain ? > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] i cannot find kinit
the name of my active directory domain is niit.edu.pk so what should i write in this parameter default_relam = YOUR.KERBEROS.REALM also while trying to join the domain i eecute this command kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] My shell gives me the error cannot find kinit. can any one tell me where in my file system can i find kinit Regards = Sahibzada Junaid Noor Ph # (+92) (051) 5950 940 Cell # (+92) (0333) 5223586 Qazi plaza,Third Floor,Commerical Market,Chaklala Scheme 3, Rawalpindi Islamic Republic of Pakistan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2' http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
