Re: [Samba] Group permissions and recursion
Jeremy, Never having worked with winbind, I claim a certain amount of ignorance here. I can't login as a specific user because I don't have telnet enabled on the samba server (none of the specific kerberos stuff is configured). Even though I have the template shell configured and getent passwd shows everything correctly for user 'CATNET\rtanner', I can't login via ssh. When I use smbclient I don't have access to the id command (or I don't know how to access it). But when logged in as root, I do "getent group | grep 'CATNET\\rtanner', I see what I expected. It shows me in the 'CATNET\adm staff' security group but not in 'CATNET\adm'. The former is a member of the latter so, at least on Microsoft Windows shares access granted to 'CATNET\adm' applies to 'CATNET\adm staff' as well, and that's what's not happening when mounting SAMBA shares. So, at this point, I'm not sure how to go about starting to debug why winbind isn't showing my membership in the 'CATNET\adm' group as well. I've followed the procedures in the official HOWTO, but if there's something I missed that would cause just this particular problem, do you know what that might be? Thanks, Rob On 06/27/2006 01:16 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:49:04AM -0700, Rob Tanner wrote: Here's the problem, a member of 'CATNET\adm staff' cannot access a file for which 'CATNET\adm' has r/w access (group:CATNET\134adm:rwx). But if I add 'CATNET\adm staff' even though 'CATNET\adm staff' is a member of 'CATNET\adm', it works. I thought this might be related to the smb.conf parameter 'winbind nested groups', which I set to 'yes', but it made no difference. Any ideas? Yes, that's got to be nested group evaluation not working right. Try logging on as the specific user and then calling the 'id' command to see what groups you're in. They're the ones that winbindd is giving you (and the same ones smbd will be using). From that you should be able to start debugging why winbindd isn't giving the full group list. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Group permissions and recursion
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:40:38AM +1000, Adam Nielsen wrote: > > > Here's the problem, a member of 'CATNET\adm staff' cannot access a > > > file for which 'CATNET\adm' has r/w access > > > (group:CATNET\134adm:rwx). But if > > FWIW, this works here (Samba 3.0.21rc2), but I did need 'winbind nested > groups = yes' first. I don't seem to have changed much else in > smb.conf that might affect this. Ah, glad we're fixing bugs moving forward :-). > This however, *doesn't* work. Running 'id' only tells me I'm a member > of "DOMAIN\domain users" but it doesn't list *any* other groups I'm a > member of. > > But Samba still gives me access if a group containing a group > containing me has permission. smbd has backdoors into winbindd that other processes don't. Still, I thought 'winbind nested groups' expanded for NSS groups - maybe not. I'd need to look at the code to be sure. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Group permissions and recursion
> > Here's the problem, a member of 'CATNET\adm staff' cannot access a > > file for which 'CATNET\adm' has r/w access > > (group:CATNET\134adm:rwx). But if FWIW, this works here (Samba 3.0.21rc2), but I did need 'winbind nested groups = yes' first. I don't seem to have changed much else in smb.conf that might affect this. > Try logging on as the specific user and then calling the 'id' command > to see what groups you're in. They're the ones that winbindd is > giving you (and the same ones smbd will be using). This however, *doesn't* work. Running 'id' only tells me I'm a member of "DOMAIN\domain users" but it doesn't list *any* other groups I'm a member of. But Samba still gives me access if a group containing a group containing me has permission. Cheers, Adam. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem mounting autofs directories
I'm having a problem getting Samba 3.x to handle my automount directories. Our data is on a HP server with 5 Raided disks. The disks are named /vol1 through /vol5. Each disk has a directory named projects.data which contains various project directories. I use NIS to indirectly automount these directories under /projects on each client workstation. If a user cd's to /projects, he only sees the directories that are currently mounted. To get to a specific project directory he has to force the mount by cd'ing to /projects/xxx. I've set up a Samba server (version 2.x) to export the project data as a share. Our Windows users map the K drive to \\eesamba\public. The public share has path = /projects. Like the Unix users, the Windows users only see directories that are already mounted in K:\projects. To force a directory to mount, they can type K:\projects\xxx in the address bar of Windows Explorer. This has been working well for us for a couple of years now. I want to upgrade our server to Samba 3.x to use Active Directory. I've set up a test server with the same configuration as our production server. However, I'm not getting the same behavior when it comes to the project directories. If I cd to K:\projects, the server mounts ALL the project directories in the NIS auto.projects map. Since we have over 600 project directories, this takes 5-10 minutes, during which time Windows Explorer is unusable. I've tried creating a directory of symbolic links to the project directories on the Samba server but the Samba server still mounts all the project directories as soon as I go to K:\projects. I'm working with HP boxes running HPUX 11.i. The production Samba server is running HP CIFS A.01.08 which is based on Samba version 2.2.3a. The test Samba server is running is HP CIFS A.02.02 which is based on Samba 3.0.14a I would greatly appreciate any help on this matter. Kelli --- Kelli Hosier PTDS Electrical CAD Support Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems, Baltimore, MD Phone: (410) 993-7416 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] iconv.c / static charset prototype/assembler bug?
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:25:28PM +0200, Robert Szeleney wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think there is a little bug in the current samba release (3.0.22).
>
> Take a look at cp850.c at the last line and you will see following
> definition:
>
> SMB_GENERATE_CHARSET_MODULE_8_BIT_GAP(CP850)
>
> Using the macros from charset.c, the preprocessor expands this to:
>
> NTSTATUS charset_CP850_init(void) \
> { \
> return smb_register_charset(&CP850_functions); \
> } \
>
> NTSTATUS is defined in nt_status.h as follows:
>
> typedef struct {uint32 v;} NTSTATUS;
> #define NT_STATUS(x) ((NTSTATUS) { x })
> #define NT_STATUS_V(x) ((x).v)
>
>
> Ok, when cp850/cp437 is compiled as static, config.h has following macro:
> #define static_init_charset { charset_CP850_init();
> charset_CP437_init();}
>
> This static_init_charset macro gets called in iconv.c. But at this point
> in the file there is no function prototype for charset_CP850_init and
> charset_CP437_init. Thus gcc, doesn't know that it has to reserve space on
> the stack for this 4 byte return value which actually gets returned AND
> pushed to the stack by charset_CP850_init.
Ok, I've looked into this in the current SAMBA_3_0 codebase
(the code that's in 3.0.23RC3) and this problem shouldn't
happen.
When you configure with :
./configure.developer --with-static-modules=charset_CP850
You get :
/* Decl of Static init functions */
#define static_decl_charset extern NTSTATUS charset_CP850_init(void);
followed by :
#define static_init_charset { charset_CP850_init();}
defined in include/config.h
in lib/iconv.c we have :
static_decl_charset;
at the top of the file (after #include "includes.h")
followed by :
static void lazy_initialize_iconv(void)
{
static BOOL initialized;
int i;
if (!initialized) {
initialized = True;
for(i = 0; builtin_functions[i].name; i++)
smb_register_charset(&builtin_functions[i]);
static_init_charset;
}
}
- this should cause the correct declaration and definition to
be used. Follow up this email if you think I'm incorrect on
this but I don't think it's a problem in 3.0.23 RC3.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Group permissions and recursion
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:49:04AM -0700, Rob Tanner wrote: > > Here's the problem, a member of 'CATNET\adm staff' cannot access a file > for which 'CATNET\adm' has r/w access (group:CATNET\134adm:rwx). But if > I add 'CATNET\adm staff' even though 'CATNET\adm staff' is a member of > 'CATNET\adm', it works. I thought this might be related to the smb.conf > parameter 'winbind nested groups', which I set to 'yes', but it made no > difference. Any ideas? Yes, that's got to be nested group evaluation not working right. Try logging on as the specific user and then calling the 'id' command to see what groups you're in. They're the ones that winbindd is giving you (and the same ones smbd will be using). From that you should be able to start debugging why winbindd isn't giving the full group list. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: usrmgr.exe "group name could not be found" error
Hello, Thanks for your answer. It may be a good idea. But, this user has created by "usrmgr.exe". The primary group has a mapped group. My new test : - create a user "toto" - create a global group "internet-basic-a" - edit the user "toto" and add this group. - Immediately : errors = "users is not in this group." - Command execute by samba : "smb_add_user_group: Running the command `/usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m "test3" "squid"' gave 6" - squid - solution find : delete group, and re-create group "internet" if I have more information, I will feedback. perhaps a second chance for usrmgr... Best regards. note : Samba: 3.0.20b Openldap: 2.2.24 Smbldap-tools: 0.9.2 OS: SLES9 SP3 "Rodolphe A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > after Upgrade on 3.0.22(-17) > the bug is always present. > > an idea ? > > > "Rodolphe A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello, > > > > I have the same problem this post : > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=114881731013700&w=2 > > > > After read the solution, > > What can i do for an production server on next week ? > > > > samba 3.0.22 is stable version, anybody know if it fixed this bug. > > > > > > thanks. > > Rodolphe > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Full Logout of Samba Share (from XP)
How can I logout of a samba share from Windows XP (without logging out the user on XP client)? I've got a samba 3.0.14 running on debian sarge in user=security mode. When I to file run "\\server" from a windows XP client, I get prompted for a username / password and everything works fine. If I run "net use" on the XP machine it may or may not show the connection to the server. (Don't know what affects that -- what shares I'm connected to?). But if I run "net use * /del" it disconnects from all the shares it sees. After this "net use" does not show any connected shares. If, however, I connect to the samba server (file run "\\server") it doesn't not prompt for a username / password but connects as the user from the original login. Windows is not saving the password -- if I logout from XP and log back it, I'm asked for a username/password again. Somehow the XP client is staying connected to the samba server. How can I force a disconnect? The samba server it setup (and works) to handle domain logons (does that matter?), but most clients run certain programs constantly and (want) just log in and out to access their files. Thanks, Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Group permissions and recursion
Rob Tanner wrote: > Hi, > > Now that we have successfully moved a first department share on to our > mega SAMBA server, we're in the 20% of the old 80/20 rule. Our problem > has to do with group permissions within the extended acl. I see this here too. Any hints you get would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Graham -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Group permissions and recursion
Hi, Now that we have successfully moved a first department share on to our mega SAMBA server, we're in the 20% of the old 80/20 rule. Our problem has to do with group permissions within the extended acl. We have implemented winbind along with the ADS security mode. This means that a user isn't just "jdoe", but is "MYDOMAIN\jdoe". We are using the extended ACL model which means that we can set specific permissions for specific security groups for access to any particular file. The other thing I need to point out is that we have a hierarchy of security groups. We have a security group, 'CATNET\adm' and the members of that security group are the security groups 'CATNET\adm staff' and 'CATNET\adm faculty'. The members of the latter two groups are the actual users. Here's the problem, a member of 'CATNET\adm staff' cannot access a file for which 'CATNET\adm' has r/w access (group:CATNET\134adm:rwx). But if I add 'CATNET\adm staff' even though 'CATNET\adm staff' is a member of 'CATNET\adm', it works. I thought this might be related to the smb.conf parameter 'winbind nested groups', which I set to 'yes', but it made no difference. Any ideas? Thanks. -- Rob Tanner UNIX Services Manager Linfield College, McMinnville OR -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba WINS Questions
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Vincent Fonteneau wrote: "MYPDC#00" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#00" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#00" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R Also, I forgot to mention: 193.168.2.71 and 194.168.2.71 (note the 193 and 194) are not RFC 1918 private IP addresses. That particular range of private IP addresses only goes from 192.168.0.0 up to 192.168.255.255. If you want to use private addresses, there are 17,891,328 private IP addresses available, so why cause yourself (and possibly, others) problems by using public ones? - Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and DOS databases (oplock settings not getting same results as under NT4)
Robert Mortimer wrote: Before you reply note I have read the op-locks bit of the samba manual We have a micro-focus Cobol (dos) database that ran on an old Novell server. When we moved to NT4 performance bombed. We added the correct registry keys to turn off op-locks on the NT4 server and all was OK for the next 6 years. We have no moved to SAMBA but we can not get it to perform as well as our old NT machine despite a huge hardware boost. With Oplocks on performance is OK but we get more record locks than we used to and often as the user moves to a new task there is a long delay (presumably as other peoples op-locks are broken and the data is cached locally) With Oplocks off the performance is unacceptable. Reports that were taking 10 min on the old NT4 machine are now taking over an hour to run. Using the sysinternal tools I see that the dos application is attempting to lock individual portions of the data files. Is this possible on Samba running on an ext3 file system. Is this a problem with samba of should I look at my underlying file system. Any pointers welcome. I am going to do some benchmarking over the next week all suggestions welcome We are running FC4 with samba-3.0.14a on the default ext3 filesystem. Regards Robert Try this: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_RCVBUF=65536 IPTOS_LOWDELAY lock spin time = 15 lock spin count = 100 You may have to disable some oplock settings on the client also. Have a look at: http://www.drouillard.ca/Tips&Tricks/Samba/Oplocks.htm -- Regards -- Gerald Drouillard Technology Architect Drouillard & Associates, Inc. http://www.Drouillard.ca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: SOLVED! Re: [Samba] Files are being saved as read-only
Logan, That is exactly the case. In fact, sometimes you can even see the original (now renamed) file for a second or so before it disappears. -- Rob Logan Shaw said the following on 06/26/2006 04:10 PM: On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Rob Tanner wrote: It turns out that the problem is a Microsoftism since it only happens with Office documents. It also tiurns out that only if profile acls is set to 'yes' in smb.conf do you see the problem. Set it to 'no' and no problem. Wierd eh?? I believe I remember hearing somewhere that, instead of (the Win32 equivalent of) "open(); write(); write(); write(); close();", lots of MS products first create a new file, then write the save data to the new file, then remove the old file, then rename the new to have the same name as the old[1]. The point being, when these apps are saving a file, they're not updating an existing file; instead, they're CREATING a new file. So, I would check if new files are created read-only by default; maybe that is the real problem. - Logan [1] There is some benefit to this approach: you've always got a complete copy of the file on disk at any given time, for one thing. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient and Windows ownership/permissions?
When smbclient is used to tar files from a Windows machine does it retain all of the Windows ownership and permissions info? Also, is there some way to see and/or set these values through smbclient? DIR just shows names and sizes. Thanks, David Mathog -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Joining an ADS domain...
Hi people, I'm trying to join a linux SuSE 10.0+samba 3.0.20 box to an ADS-Win2003 domain. As I configured /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf, I try to join the ADS with: root # net ads join -U Administrator% the system replays: Using short domain name -- then freezes, i.e. no prompt returns. I wait several minutes, then from another console I typed: root # net ads testjoin and system replays: Join is OK. at this point I breaked (Ctrl-C) the freezed prompt. Again, net ads testjoin replays Join is OK. All this appears to me something wrong Any ideas? what's wrong? Thanks NanniX -- Nessun virus nel messaggio in uscita. Controllato da AVG Antivirus. Versione: 7.1.394 / Database dei virus: 268.9.5/376 - Data di rilascio: 26/06/06 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba WINS Questions
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Vincent Fonteneau wrote: Finaly WINS problem solved, I'm not so sure. The WINS server is supposed to maintain a dynamic database that is updated every time some NetBIOS names are registered or deregistered on the network. Just stuffing data into the databases like that isn't likely to really work properly. WINS replication is used (but I don't know if I can use the expression "replication") by entering new parameters in /var/lib/samba/wins.dat before starting smb daemon on BDC1 the wins.dat should goes with : "MYDOMAIN#00" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1b" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 64R "MYDOMAIN#1c" 1151663528 192.168.2.71 193.168.2.71 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1e" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYPDC#00" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#03" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#20" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#00" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#03" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#20" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#00" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#03" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#20" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R on BDCs the wins.dat should goes with : "MYDOMAIN#00" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1b" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 64R "MYDOMAIN#1c" 1151663528 192.168.2.71 193.168.2.71 194.168.2.71 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1e" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYPDC#00" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#03" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#20" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#00" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#03" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#20" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#00" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#03" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#20" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R That should be pretty good until Thu Jun 29 14:02:00 2006 (UTC) when the entries with the timestamp 1151589720 will expire. If you're going to hardcode data into WINS, at least read the documentation on how to do that: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/NetworkBrowsing.html#id2554221 Of course, I still recommend that you don't try to force software to do replication when it wasn't designed to do that. - Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Trouble with windows mounts after reboot of windows server
Evert wrote: The problem is that I have a couple of shares of a W2K server mounted with Samba on my (Gentoo) Linux. This works fine, until the W2K server gets rebooted. After that the shares are just timing out, and they are impossible to unmount/remount... :-/ On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Evert wrote: Anyone...? I know I'm not the only one with this problem... :-/ You're probably not, but if you're exporting shares from W2K and mounting them on Linux, that's not a Samba problem as far as I know. Samba is only used when Linux is the server, not when it's mounting a CIFS filesystem from a remote server. - Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and DOS databases (oplock settings not getting same results as under NT4)
Before you reply note I have read the op-locks bit of the samba manual We have a micro-focus Cobol (dos) database that ran on an old Novell server. When we moved to NT4 performance bombed. We added the correct registry keys to turn off op-locks on the NT4 server and all was OK for the next 6 years. We have no moved to SAMBA but we can not get it to perform as well as our old NT machine despite a huge hardware boost. With Oplocks on performance is OK but we get more record locks than we used to and often as the user moves to a new task there is a long delay (presumably as other peoples op-locks are broken and the data is cached locally) With Oplocks off the performance is unacceptable. Reports that were taking 10 min on the old NT4 machine are now taking over an hour to run. Using the sysinternal tools I see that the dos application is attempting to lock individual portions of the data files. Is this possible on Samba running on an ext3 file system. Is this a problem with samba of should I look at my underlying file system. Any pointers welcome. I am going to do some benchmarking over the next week all suggestions welcome We are running FC4 with samba-3.0.14a on the default ext3 filesystem. Regards Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to cancel print-jobs with Samba+CUPS via WinXP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Komal Shah wrote: >> I'd suggest reading up on Samba configuration >> a little bit more. Look how details on how to >> setup a guest accessible server using 'map to guest' >> and 'username map' > > If I am correct guest directive is only applicable > in security=share. Nope. Not correct. Sorry. cheers, jerry = Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEoUqrIR7qMdg1EfYRAvy8AKCNw8xuU+1DFYI8OEBLI5ksE2S5eQCeL7Fe D22RLvVuKOvWk+sf0U27exQ= =h0dd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to cancel print-jobs with Samba+CUPS via WinXP
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 d.arun321 wrote: Thanks Jerry -- for your assistance. The solution was precise but i am facing an authentication issue. When I use the "use security = user" in the smb.conf then its promoting for a username and password. Is there any way for skipping this check. I'd suggest reading up on Samba configuration a little bit more. Look how details on how to setup a guest accessible server using 'map to guest' and 'username map' If I am correct guest directive is only applicable in security=share. Regards, Komal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: usrmgr.exe "group name could not be found" error
after Upgrade on 3.0.22(-17) the bug is always present. an idea ? "Rodolphe A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello, > > I have the same problem this post : > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=114881731013700&w=2 > > After read the solution, > What can i do for an production server on next week ? > > samba 3.0.22 is stable version, anybody know if it fixed this bug. > > > thanks. > Rodolphe > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Re: [Samba] Unable to cancel print-jobs with Samba+CUPS via WinXP
Hi Jerry, I am facing a peculiar problem when I try to give a print-command. I was trying to issue a print from the notepad and the error "A StartDocPrinter call was not issued" is being reported continuously. This error is persisting even if I revert back to the "secutity = share" in the smb.conf file -- I have restarted both Samba and CUPS. Is the above error something related to the authentication issue ? Thanks, Arun "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 d.arun321 wrote: > Thanks Jerry -- for your assistance. > > The solution was precise but i am facing > an authentication issue. When I use the "use > security = user" in the smb.conf then its promoting > for a username and password. > > Is there any way for skipping this check. I'd suggest reading up on Samba configuration a little bit more. Look how details on how to setup a guest accessible server using 'map to guest' and 'username map' cheers, jerry = Samba --- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEn7vuIR7qMdg1EfYRAvl5AKCCHbFFPgc3u1YBTKZ28W1mk/E4/gCfaM+w 1M7aQwUsKaHTjIoEiLKj5RM= =7iaV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] multiple domains/ ldap /smbldap_search function/pdbedit/
>the organization is: >1)ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr (the first domain) > > And your answer is here! dc=univ,dc=fr includes EVERYTHING - domain2 and domain3 and of course People,Groups from the top of LDAP tree. >2)ou=People,ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr > > This for example consists ONLY with EVERYTHING in subtree: ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr - that's why if you try and change samba "ldap suffix = ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr - it will work OK. You will ONLY see people,groups and whatever you have but from this particular subtree. >3)ou=People,ou=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr Sorry i've made a mistake: the three domains: 1)ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr 2)ou=People,dc=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr (dc and not ou) 2)ou=People,dc=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr (dc and not ou) and i thought samba search only into the People branch under the suffix ldap mentioned into the smb.conf dc=univ,dc=fr and not under the other one . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] usrmgr.exe "group name could not be found" error
Hello, I have the same problem this post : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=114881731013700&w=2 After read the solution, What can i do for an production server on next week ? samba 3.0.22 is stable version, anybody know if it fixed this bug. thanks. Rodolphe -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] iconv.c / static charset prototype/assembler bug?
Hi!
I think there is a little bug in the current samba release (3.0.22).
Take a look at cp850.c at the last line and you will see following
definition:
SMB_GENERATE_CHARSET_MODULE_8_BIT_GAP(CP850)
Using the macros from charset.c, the preprocessor expands this to:
NTSTATUS charset_CP850_init(void) \
{ \
return smb_register_charset(&CP850_functions); \
} \
NTSTATUS is defined in nt_status.h as follows:
typedef struct {uint32 v;} NTSTATUS;
#define NT_STATUS(x) ((NTSTATUS) { x })
#define NT_STATUS_V(x) ((x).v)
Ok, when cp850/cp437 is compiled as static, config.h has following macro:
#define static_init_charset { charset_CP850_init();
charset_CP437_init();}
This static_init_charset macro gets called in iconv.c. But at this point
in the file there is no function prototype for charset_CP850_init and
charset_CP437_init. Thus gcc, doesn't know that it has to reserve space on
the stack for this 4 byte return value which actually gets returned AND
pushed to the stack by charset_CP850_init.
After adding following prototype to config.h, everything works as
expected:
NT_STATUS charset_CP850_init(void);
You may look at this disassembly which shows whats going wrong exactely:
iconv.c: smb_iconv_open(): (With the NT_STATUS charset_CP850_init(void);
prototype:)
807c173: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
807c175: 75 e9 jne807c160
807c177: 8d 45 eclea0xffec(%ebp),%eax
807c17a: 83 ec 0csub$0xc,%esp
807c17d: 50 push %eax // here gcc reserves
space on the stack
807c17e: e8 b9 96 00 00 call 808583c
807c183: 83 c4 0cadd$0xc,%esp
807c186: e8 7d 98 00 00 call 8085a08
iconv.c: smb_iconv_open(): (Without the NT_STATUS
charset_CP850_init(void); prototype:)
807c173: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
807c175: 75 e9 jne807c160
807c177: e8 b8 96 00 00 call 8085834
// no space reserved
807c17c: e8 7f 98 00 00 call 8085a00
cp850.c : charset_CP850_init
808583c: 55 push %ebp
808583d: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
808583f: 56 push %esi
8085840: 53 push %ebx
8085841: 83 ec 18sub$0x18,%esp
8085844: e8 00 00 00 00 call 8085849
8085849: 5b pop%ebx
808584a: 81 c3 8f 1a 03 00 add$0x31a8f,%ebx
8085850: 8b 75 08mov0x8(%ebp),%esi // read
NT_STATUS
8085853: 8d 55 f4lea0xfff4(%ebp),%edx
8085856: 8d 83 ac 60 00 00 lea0x60ac(%ebx),%eax
808585c: 50 push %eax
808585d: 52 push %edx
808585e: e8 73 67 ff ff call 807bfd6
8085863: 8b 45 f4mov0xfff4(%ebp),%eax
8085866: 89 06 mov%eax,(%esi) // write
NT_STATUS
8085868: 89 f0 mov%esi,%eax
808586a: 8d 65 f8lea0xfff8(%ebp),%esp
808586d: 5b pop%ebx
808586e: 5e pop%esi
808586f: 5d pop%ebp
8085870: c2 04 00ret$0x4
8085873: 90 nop
As you can see,
8085866: 89 06 mov%eax,(%esi) // write
NT_STATUS
tries to write the error code to the address pushed on the stack before,
which actually never happened when the prototype is missing.
Btw, this is compiled with GCC 4.1.1 / ELF / PIC
May I be wrong here? Do you need any additional information?
Thanks!
Robert!
http://www.skyos.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] multiple domains/ ldap /smbldap_search function/pdbedit/
Didier Roques napisał(a): Didier Roques napisaÅ‚(a): Hi all, Hello, I use samba 3.0.20 the ldap paramaters into the smb.conf are: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost smbpasswd guest ldap suffix = dc=univ,dc=fr ldap machine suffix = ou=Hosts ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap Into my ldap tree i've got 3 domains samba defined some uid exists into 2 of 3 domains I also have more than 3 domains in my LDAP ... but it works great!!! (toto01 exists twice but into two differents domains) If i use pdbedit -L -v -d 10 toto01 i've got the following thing: smbldap_search_ext: base => [dc=univ,dc=fr], filter => [(&(uid=toto01)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope => [2] ldapsam_getsampwnam: Duplicate entries for this user [toto01] Failing. count=2 How are the domains organized? According to your information it seems that dc=univ,dc=fr is a base for all 3 domains - am I right? In such case the message you get is NORMAL. Shouldn't it be like this: 1) ou=People,ou=domain1,dc=univ,dc=fr 2) ou=People,ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr 3) ou=People,ou=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr? But then your samba ldap suffix should be: ldap suffix = ou=domainx,dc=univ,dc=fr the organization is: 1)ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr (the first domain) And your answer is here! dc=univ,dc=fr includes EVERYTHING - domain2 and domain3 and of course People,Groups from the top of LDAP tree. 2)ou=People,ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr This for example consists ONLY with EVERYTHING in subtree: ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr - that's why if you try and change samba "ldap suffix = ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr - it will work OK. You will ONLY see people,groups and whatever you have but from this particular subtree. 3)ou=People,ou=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr the three domains are not at the same level into the ldap tree ! I think the solution you give is a nice one (i thought to use it before). But i'd like to know why the function smbldap_search_ext doesn't search into the right branch given by the ldap parameters of smb.conf? is it a bug or normal ? thanks a lot about your response BR, Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] multiple domains/ ldap /smbldap_search function/pdbedit/
> Didier Roques napisaÅ(a): >> Hi all, >> > Hello, >> I use samba 3.0.20 >> >> the ldap paramaters into the smb.conf are: >> passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost smbpasswd guest >> ldap suffix = dc=univ,dc=fr >> ldap machine suffix = ou=Hosts >> ldap user suffix = ou=People >> ldap group suffix = ou=Group >> ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap >> >> Into my ldap tree i've got 3 domains samba defined >> some uid exists into 2 of 3 domains >> > I also have more than 3 domains in my LDAP ... but it works great!!! >> (toto01 exists twice but into two differents domains) >> If i use pdbedit -L -v -d 10 toto01 i've got the following thing: >> >> smbldap_search_ext: base => [dc=univ,dc=fr], filter => >> [(&(uid=toto01)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope => [2] >> ldapsam_getsampwnam: Duplicate entries for this user [toto01] Failing. >> count=2 >> > How are the domains organized? According to your information it seems > that dc=univ,dc=fr is a base for all 3 domains - am I right? In such > case the message you get is NORMAL. Shouldn't it be like this: > 1) ou=People,ou=domain1,dc=univ,dc=fr > 2) ou=People,ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr > 3) ou=People,ou=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr? > > But then your samba ldap suffix should be: > > ldap suffix = ou=domainx,dc=univ,dc=fr > the organization is: 1)ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr (the first domain) 2)ou=People,ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr 3)ou=People,ou=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr the three domains are not at the same level into the ldap tree ! I think the solution you give is a nice one (i thought to use it before). But i'd like to know why the function smbldap_search_ext doesn't search into the right branch given by the ldap parameters of smb.conf? is it a bug or normal ? thanks a lot about your response -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba WINS Questions
Finaly WINS problem solved, WINS replication is used (but I don't know if I can use the expression "replication") by entering new parameters in /var/lib/samba/wins.dat before starting smb daemon on BDC1 the wins.dat should goes with : "MYDOMAIN#00" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1b" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 64R "MYDOMAIN#1c" 1151663528 192.168.2.71 193.168.2.71 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1e" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYPDC#00" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#03" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#20" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#00" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#03" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#20" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#00" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#03" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#20" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R on BDCs the wins.dat should goes with : "MYDOMAIN#00" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1b" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 64R "MYDOMAIN#1c" 1151663528 192.168.2.71 193.168.2.71 194.168.2.71 e4R "MYDOMAIN#1e" 1151663528 255.255.255.255 e4R "MYPDC#00" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#03" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYPDC#20" 1151589720 192.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#00" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#03" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC1#20" 1151663528 193.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#00" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#03" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R "MYBDC2#20" 1151663528 194.168.2.71 66R Then restarting PDC and all BDCs and looking to the log.nmbd. After few seconds I could see in the browse.dat and wins.dat all the network goes up. Finaly, by take a look to the network neighborhood, I can see all the computers from MYDOMAIN even if subnets are differents. I could use one Wins server a site and then according all Wins with PDC. Vincent Maybe Samba4Wins could be used? http://enterprisesamba.org/index.php?id=88 Cheers, henrik 26 jun 2006 kl. 21:23 skrev Logan Shaw: On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Vincent Fonteneau wrote: I'm using Samba 3.0.21c with PDC and severals BDC in different subnets. I'm triing to use Wins servers on all the BDC servers and on the PDC. The problems occurs in the network browsing. Hopefully someone will correct me if I'm wrong (please...), but as far as I know, the only valid WINS configuration is to have exactly one WINS server for a given domain. WINS servers can't sync, so if you have more than one, you would have two different, inconsistent view of the NetBIOS names available within the domain. - Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] multiple domains/ ldap /smbldap_search function/pdbedit/
Didier Roques napisał(a): Hi all, Hello, I use samba 3.0.20 the ldap paramaters into the smb.conf are: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost smbpasswd guest ldap suffix = dc=univ,dc=fr ldap machine suffix = ou=Hosts ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap Into my ldap tree i've got 3 domains samba defined some uid exists into 2 of 3 domains I also have more than 3 domains in my LDAP ... but it works great!!! (toto01 exists twice but into two differents domains) If i use pdbedit -L -v -d 10 toto01 i've got the following thing: smbldap_search_ext: base => [dc=univ,dc=fr], filter => [(&(uid=toto01)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope => [2] ldapsam_getsampwnam: Duplicate entries for this user [toto01] Failing. count=2 How are the domains organized? According to your information it seems that dc=univ,dc=fr is a base for all 3 domains - am I right? In such case the message you get is NORMAL. Shouldn't it be like this: 1) ou=People,ou=domain1,dc=univ,dc=fr 2) ou=People,ou=domain2,dc=univ,dc=fr 3) ou=People,ou=domain3,dc=univ,dc=fr? But then your samba ldap suffix should be: ldap suffix = ou=domainx,dc=univ,dc=fr Why the smbldap_search_ext doesn't search uid only in the ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr branch the filter returned by the smbldap_search_ext seems to be [(&(uid=toto01)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount)) How to force smb to search only the uid into the branch defined by the ldap parameters (ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr) ? thanks a lot Hope this helps you ;) Regards, Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] multiple domains/ ldap /smbldap_search function/pdbedit/
Hi all, I use samba 3.0.20 the ldap paramaters into the smb.conf are: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost smbpasswd guest ldap suffix = dc=univ,dc=fr ldap machine suffix = ou=Hosts ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap Into my ldap tree i've got 3 domains samba defined some uid exists into 2 of 3 domains (toto01 exists twice but into two differents domains) If i use pdbedit -L -v -d 10 toto01 i've got the following thing: smbldap_search_ext: base => [dc=univ,dc=fr], filter => [(&(uid=toto01)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))], scope => [2] ldapsam_getsampwnam: Duplicate entries for this user [toto01] Failing. count=2 Why the smbldap_search_ext doesn't search uid only in the ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr branch the filter returned by the smbldap_search_ext seems to be [(&(uid=toto01)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount)) How to force smb to search only the uid into the branch defined by the ldap parameters (ou=People,dc=univ,dc=fr) ? thanks a lot -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Xp user opens file via Samba, but file is not locked after opening???
Hi. I have Samba on my FC5 x86_64. Problem: When XP users edit the file, after a moment I open the same file with Fedora, the file is not locked and also not read only! And I can write on Fedora this file, however XP users are editing the file. Is there solution for this, to lock the opened file? So that other users can not write to it? Thanks -- Maris Dembovskis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows XP suddenly can't login to PDC
In my case i use samba 3.0.22 and the problem is exactly the same.any ideas?ThanksFerencOn Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:36:42AM +0100, Micha Kersloot wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a Samba 3.0.2a PDC running for some time now (like more than a > year) with MS Windows XP clients. But suddenly on January 23 2006 none > of the clients where able to login anymore. The error on the client was > (translated from dutch): > Unable to connect to domain server. > > The logfile on the samba side showed: > [2006/01/23 11:36:30, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(722) > smbldap_open_connection: connection opened > [2006/01/23 11:36:30, 3] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(905) > ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server > [2006/01/23 11:36:30, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(640) > init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: computer3$ > [2006/01/23 11:36:30, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) > pop_sec_ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2006/01/23 11:36:30, 0] libsmb/credentials.c:creds_server_check(159) > creds_server_check: credentials check failed. > [2006/01/23 11:36:30, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:_net_auth_2(424) > _net_auth2: creds_server_check failed. Rejecting auth request from > client COMPUTER3 machine account COMPUTER3$ > > I was able to solve the problem by upgrading to 3.0.21a, and rejoining > the MS Windows XP clients to the domain. But as i have now idea what > caused this problem, i don't know if this suddenly could happen again. > Anyone an idea what was going on? > > This is something we specifically added in a fix into 3.0.21a for. > The netlogon code needed to cache the credentials between connections, > and we now do this. > > Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and trusted domains
i guess this is your problem > User test1 does not exist, trying to add it what does id for a trusted domain user give you? probably you have to do TRUSTDOMAIN\\username greez Nir Barkan wrote: Hi All, I installed samba 3.0.22 and join it to Win2003 AD domain. Users from my domain can access the samba shares successfully. My problem is that users from trusted domains can not access to my samba shares Wbinfo -m - show all the trusted domains Wbinfo -u - show all the users include the trusted domains users. Any Idea? My smb.conf global parameters: # Global parameters [global] allow trusted domains = yes netbios name = tiger realm = ITGIL.COM security = ADS encrypt passwords = yes wins server = 172.18.1.126 workgroup = ITGIL debug level = 3 idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 winbind separator = \ winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind use default domain = Yes winbind trusted domains only = Yes browsable = yes guest ok = yes The log.smbd: [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:check_reload(1428) Printcap cache time expired. [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] printing/pcap.c:pcap_cache_reload(117) reloading printcap cache [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] printing/print_svid.c:sysv_cache_reload(72) No Printers found!!! [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] printing/pcap.c:pcap_cache_reload(223) reload status: error [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] printing/pcap.c:pcap_cache_reload(117) reloading printcap cache [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] printing/print_svid.c:sysv_cache_reload(72) No Printers found!!! [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] printing/pcap.c:pcap_cache_reload(223) reload status: error [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(871) open_oplock_ipc: initializing messages. [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194) Transaction 0 of length 137 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(993) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 14477) conn 0x0 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(486) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_nt1(357) using SPNEGO [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(579) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194) Transaction 1 of length 240 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(993) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 14477) conn 0x0 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(822) wct=12 flg2=0xc807 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(772) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(633) Doing spnego session setup [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(664) NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525) Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(528) Got secblob of size 40 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:debug_ntlmssp_flags(63) Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xe2088297 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194) Transaction 2 of length 368 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(993) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 14477) conn 0x0 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(822) wct=12 flg2=0xc807 [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(772) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(633) Doing spnego session setup [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(664) NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 2 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[] [2006/06/26 08:29:18, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:nt
[Samba] Re: Trouble with windows mounts after reboot of windows server
Anyone...? I know I'm not the only one with this problem... :-/ Regards, Evert Evert wrote: > Hi all! > > Am I the only one with this problem? I doubt it... > > > The problem is that I have a couple of shares of a W2K server mounted with > Samba on my (Gentoo) Linux. This works fine, until the W2K server gets > rebooted. After that the shares are just timing out, > and they are impossible to unmount/remount... :-/ > > > How do I prevent/fix this problem? > > > Regards, > Evert > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
