[Samba] issue with tesparam

2011-10-04 Thread Harry Jede
OS: Debian squeeze
Samba: 3.5.6

# testparm --section-name=global -s 2>&1|grep ALIX
returns nothing

# grep ALIX /etc/samba/smb.conf
  netbios name = ALIX
works


-- 

Regards
Harry Jede
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba users profiles directory failing to mount in windows client

2011-10-04 Thread Harry Jede
On 23:55:42 wrote greep elem:
> I am having some issues with Samba with roaming profiles running on
> Ubuntu server.  When a user logs in they get prompted with an error:
> 
> windows error--
> Windows cannot locate the server copy of your roaming profile and is
> attempting to log you
> on with your local profile. Changes to the profile will not be copied
> to the server when
> you logoff. Possible causes of this error include network problems or
> insufficient security
> rights. If this problem persists, contact your network administrator.
> 
> DETAIL - The network path was not found.
> windows error--
> 
> While trying to figure this out I believe I have found the problem
> but am unsure how to fix it.  It would appear that for the "logon
> path = \\%N\Profiles\%U" entry in smb.conf that the %N (or even %L)
> does not get translated to the netbios name of the server.
> 
> doing the following command shows the %N still untranslated while the
> %U is correctly updated to the user name
> 
> # pdbedit -Lv testuser | grep Path
> Profile Path: \\%N\profiles\testuser
> 
> If I manually hard code the %N  to the servers name instead of using
> %N or %L the roaming profile works perfectly.
> 
> 
> Can anyone point me in the right direction so as to resolve this
> issue?
Use "netbios name" instead of "netbios aliases"

-- 

Regards
Harry Jede
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] wbinfo command generate a winbindd core dump

2011-10-04 Thread Harry Jede
OS Debian squeeze
# wbinfo -V
Version 3.5.6


ute@alix:~$ wbinfo --getdcname=KRONPRINZ
Could not get dc name for KRONPRINZ

As root and as unprivilegd user, this command results in a winbind core 
dump.


[2011/10/04 23:40:18.022674,  0] lib/fault.c:46(fault_report)
  ===
[2011/10/04 23:40:18.030995,  0] lib/fault.c:47(fault_report)
  INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 20226 (3.5.6)
  Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO
[2011/10/04 23:40:18.031215,  0] lib/fault.c:49(fault_report)
  
  From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf
[2011/10/04 23:40:18.031412,  0] lib/fault.c:50(fault_report)
  ===
[2011/10/04 23:40:18.031550,  0] lib/util.c:1465(smb_panic)
  PANIC (pid 20226): internal error
[2011/10/04 23:40:18.063944,  0] lib/util.c:1569(log_stack_trace)
  BACKTRACE: 17 stack frames:
   #0 /usr/sbin/winbindd(log_stack_trace+0x1a) [0x7fc86ae39b0a]
   #1 /usr/sbin/winbindd(smb_panic+0x1f) [0x7fc86ae39bcf]
   #2 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x1a374d) [0x7fc86ae2974d]
   #3 /lib/libc.so.6(+0x321e0) [0x7fc86893d1e0]
   #4 /usr/sbin/winbindd(winbindd_getdcname_recv+0xc4) [0x7fc86adb73c4]
   #5 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0xe1a7d) [0x7fc86ad67a7d]
   #6 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x12aa96) [0x7fc86adb0a96]
   #7 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x10c757) [0x7fc86ad92757]
   #8 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x10c07d) [0x7fc86ad9207d]
   #9 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x13459d) [0x7fc86adba59d]
   #10 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x134d4b) [0x7fc86adbad4b]
   #11 /usr/sbin/winbindd(run_events+0x1b2) [0x7fc86ae49342]
   #12 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0x1c3601) [0x7fc86ae49601]
   #13 /usr/sbin/winbindd(_tevent_loop_once+0x90) [0x7fc86ae499e0]
   #14 /usr/sbin/winbindd(main+0x933) [0x7fc86ad68fa3]
   #15 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7fc868929c4d]
   #16 /usr/sbin/winbindd(+0xe0a79) [0x7fc86ad66a79]
[2011/10/04 23:40:18.070826,  0] lib/fault.c:326(dump_core)
  dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/winbindd


-- 

Regards
Harry Jede
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] security of ntlmauth / winbindd_privileged dir

2011-10-04 Thread Harry Jede
I have a working setup with samba & squid on one machine. However it 
seems that ntlm_auth is not doing what I expected.

As an unprivilegd user I am able to test succesfull password:


ute@alix:~$ ntlm_auth -V
Version 3.5.6


ute@alix:~$ ntlm_auth  --username=hans --password=keins
NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0)

Surely I know this password.



Now the same with diagnostics on:

ute@alix:~$ ntlm_auth --diagnostics --username=hans --password=keins

winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.107135,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test LM failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.108233,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test LM and NTLM failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.108713,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLM failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.108951,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLM in LM failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.109218,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLM in both failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.109478,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLMv2 failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.109611,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLMv2 and LMv2 failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.109742,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test LMv2 failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.109871,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLMv2 and LMv2, LMv2 broken failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.110300,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test NTLM and LM, LM broken failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.110751,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test Plaintext failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.110874,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test Plaintext LM broken failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.92,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test Plaintext NT only failed!
winbind client not authorized to use winbindd_pam_auth_crap. Ensure 
permissions on /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged are set correctly. 
(0xc022)
[2011/10/01 14:56:15.111303,  1] 
utils/ntlm_auth_diagnostics.c:601(diagnose_ntlm_auth)
  Test Plaintext LM only failed!

This time the password test failed. 

Here is the relevant config:

# ls -la /var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged/
insgesamt 8
drwxr-x--- 2 root winbindd_priv 4096  1. Okt 14:33 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root  4096  1. Okt 14:33 ..
srwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0  1. Okt 14:33 pipe

# getent group winbindd_priv
winbindd_priv:x

[Samba] Samba users profiles directory failing to mount in windows client

2011-10-04 Thread greep elem
I am having some issues with Samba with roaming profiles running on Ubuntu
server.  When a user logs in they get prompted with an error:

windows error--
Windows cannot locate the server copy of your roaming profile and is
attempting to log you
on with your local profile. Changes to the profile will not be copied to the
server when
you logoff. Possible causes of this error include network problems or
insufficient security
rights. If this problem persists, contact your network administrator.

DETAIL - The network path was not found.
windows error--

While trying to figure this out I believe I have found the problem but am
unsure how to fix it.  It would appear that for the "logon path =
\\%N\Profiles\%U" entry in smb.conf that the %N (or even %L) does not get
translated to the netbios name of the server.

doing the following command shows the %N still untranslated while the %U is
correctly updated to the user name

# pdbedit -Lv testuser | grep Path
Profile Path: \\%N\profiles\testuser

If I manually hard code the %N  to the servers name instead of using %N or
%L the roaming profile works perfectly.


Can anyone point me in the right direction so as to resolve this issue?


Server setup:

Ubuntu server 11.04
Samba 3.5.8
OpenLDAP 2.4.23
Windows XP SP3 clients

smb.conf below:

--[ smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = TESTDOMAIN
netbios aliases = TESTSRV
obey pam restrictions = Yes
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost
passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd -u %u
passwd chat = "Changing *\nNew password*" %n\n "*Retype new
password*" %n\n"
passwd chat timeout = 4
log level = 3
syslog = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
add user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m '%u'
delete user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-userdel %u
add group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p '%g'
delete group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupdel '%g'
add user to group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m '%u'
'%g'
delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x
'%u' '%g'
set primary group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g '%g'
'%u'
add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w '%u'
logon path = \\%N\Profiles\%U
logon drive = H:
domain logons = Yes
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins support = Yes
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=testdomain
ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
ldap passwd sync = yes
ldap suffix = dc=testdomain
ldap ssl = no
ldap user suffix = ou=Users
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
Read only = No
browseable = No

[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /home/samba/netlogon
admin users = root
guest ok = Yes
browseable = No

[Profiles]
comment = Roaming Profile Share
path = /home/samba/profiles
read only = No
profile acls = Yes
browseable = No
--[ smb.conf
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 Permission

2011-10-04 Thread Mike
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Marcel de Reuver wrote:

> 2011/10/4 Mike <1100...@gmail.com>Do it from a Windows pc with
> Administration Tools installed.
> See:
>
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO#Step_1:_Installing_Windows_Remote_Administration_Tools_onto_Windows
>
>
Thank you, Marcel.
It's quite a different world now -- configuring linux servers with gui
tools, and windows tools at that.
I need to go forward and try it.

Best regards,

Mike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 Permission

2011-10-04 Thread Marcel de Reuver
2011/10/4 Mike <1100...@gmail.com>

> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Daniel Müller  >wrote:
>
> > For every share in samba4 login as administator from a windows client.
> Give
> > your rights according to your
> > groups and users as you would for an windows ads server that’s all.
> Working
> > for me.
> >
> > Greetings
> > Daniel
> >
>
> Daniel,
> Thank you for writing.
> Assume I have completed a new server installation, what commands are used
> in
> Samba4 to create the users,groups, and various share 'masks'.
> Best regards,
> Mike
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>

Do it from a Windows pc with Administration Tools installed.
See:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO#Step_1:_Installing_Windows_Remote_Administration_Tools_onto_Windows

-- 
BR, Marcel de Reuver
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] LDAP: Mixing local and LDAP-Users

2011-10-04 Thread Gaiseric Vandal



On 10/04/2011 01:21 PM, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 04-10-2011 04:16, Daniel Müller wrote:

When you use LDAP?! Why do you need local users and ldap users?
Just you need LDAP that’s all.

I'm pretty sure different networks have differents demands.

This is not "one rule fit them all".

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel

Tecnologia da Informação (TI) - Complexo Pequeno Príncipe
http://www.pequenoprincipe.org.br/T: +55 41 3310 1747
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=HJdF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Windows OS domain members will at least have a local Administrator 
account.I have two member servers and two DC's.  All use LDAP for 
unix backends.  One member server uses TBD backed for the one local user 
(Administrator) -  though the unix account for the Administrator is 
actually the same as the domain Administrator. It also uses tbd for 
group mappings.  The 2nd member server does not have any local samba 
accounts or groups.The samba shares are pretty open since we rely on 
the local unix permissions for security, and set them via unix not 
windows.But if I wanted to manage perms from windows clients I would 
probably need to define the local Administrator user, local Admins 
group, and local users group.









--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Fwd: Win 7 Pro

2011-10-04 Thread Gaiseric Vandal

On 10/04/2011 01:45 PM, Harry Jede wrote:

On 19:40:52 wrote sa...@printflow.eu:

I added WINS server to my DHCP config and  now I join domain. THX ! I
did not undo settings from http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
to check. I will try with next machine in about week. This page also
noted that registry setting is not needed with patch from MS witch
seems be instaled.

This led me to other question, I have two PDCs on my network for two
companies. If I set both WINS server in DHCP setting may I expect it
will work? Does w7 checks both of them?

You should have *one and only one* WINS-Server per ethernet segment.
WINS use broadcasts.


I thought WINS clients registered with WINS servers-  which means that 
the WINS DB is updated with that client, and that the WIN client can 
then resolve client names to IP address.   WINS lets you avoid issues 
with finding machines by broadcast.


If you have a windows server as a WINS server, it can replicate/sync 
data with other WINS servers. I believe there is an recommended max 
limit for how many clients a WINS server should support-  although I 
think it is unlikely that one ethernet segment would have so many to 
really need more than 1 WINS server.



Conceptually, if you had two completely separate Windows or Samba 
domains, each with its own PDC.   I could see that you could allow them 
each to have their own WINS server, and the WINS server's would not 
replicate.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] USB Drive Permissions?

2011-10-04 Thread Nicholas Oleksinski
More...

Here is the mtab entry:

noleks-ub:~> cat /etc/mtab
/dev/sda1 / ext4 rw,errors=remount-ro 0 0
proc /proc proc rw 0 0
none /sys sysfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
none /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw 0 0
none /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw 0 0
none /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw 0 0
none /dev devtmpfs rw,mode=0755 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev 0 0
none /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 0 0
none /var/lock tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
none /lib/init/rw tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 0 0
binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
gvfs-fuse-daemon /home/noleks/.gvfs fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon
rw,nosuid,nodev,user=noleks 0 0
*/dev/sdb1 /media/Personal1 fuseblk
rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096,default_permissions 0 0*

I think I'm real close here as a result of Chris' guidance.
Is there a way to control what options the automounter uses when I plug in
the drive?

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM,  wrote:

> Hi Chris
> An update...
> Sharing /media worked, but I still cannot access /media/Personal1, which is
> actually a Western Digital portable HD.
> I can see all the directories in /media. I made a test folder called
> public, chmod 777, and I can edit files in there from my client.
>
> The Disk Utility reports that the drive is Partition Type HPFS/NTFS, Type:
> NTFS.
>
> Not sure how to figure out what Ubuntu is using for automount...
>
>
> On , nolek...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Chris:
> > Thanks for the help. I will investigate the automounter documentation re:
> filesystem types and permissions.
> > Can you help me understand what "Force user" mode is?
> > I am going to try to share /media with "User" authentication mode.
> > Thanks again
> >
> > On , Chris Weiss cwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Oleksinski
> nolek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just installed Samba on my Karmic box and I am trying to share a
> USB drive
> > >
> > > > that has been mounted to /media/Personal1.
> > >
> > > > 1) It is owned by noleks (me)
> > >
> > > > 2) Its permissions are 700, unchangeable (?)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To change default permissions, you'd have to consult your automounter
> > >
> > > docs.  As most usb sticks are fat32, they don't actually have
> > >
> > > permissions, so what you are seeing is a posix permission emulation
> > >
> > > layer in the vfat fs driver, which is controlled by mount flags.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > However, and a bigger problem, is that when you make a share on a
> > >
> > > mount point and the connect to it, smbd will tend to lock the mount
> > >
> > > point and you won't be able to cleanly unmount the disk without
> > >
> > > manually killing the smbd process that has it locked.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What I have done in the past is to share out /media with the "force
> > >
> > > user" option so that access to the usb disks is done as my desktop
> > >
> > > login user.  As I recall, this locks /media but not /media/Personal1
> > >
> > > so that issue is resolved.  The force user option is a lot easier to
> > >
> > > deal with than automounters.  And sharing /media means all your usb
> > >
> > > drives will work without adding a share for each one.  you also get
> > >
> > > cd/dvd-rom sharing.
> > >
> > >
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] USB Drive Permissions?

2011-10-04 Thread noleksin

Hi Chris
An update...
Sharing /media worked, but I still cannot access /media/Personal1, which is  
actually a Western Digital portable HD.
I can see all the directories in /media. I made a test folder called  
public, chmod 777, and I can edit files in there from my client.


The Disk Utility reports that the drive is Partition Type HPFS/NTFS, Type:  
NTFS.


Not sure how to figure out what Ubuntu is using for automount...

On , nolek...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Chris:
Thanks for the help. I will investigate the automounter documentation re:  
filesystem types and permissions.

Can you help me understand what "Force user" mode is?
I am going to try to share /media with "User" authentication mode.
Thanks again



On , Chris Weiss cwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Oleksinski  
nolek...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > I just installed Samba on my Karmic box and I am trying to share a  
USB drive

>
> > that has been mounted to /media/Personal1.
>
> > 1) It is owned by noleks (me)
>
> > 2) Its permissions are 700, unchangeable (?)
>
>
>
> To change default permissions, you'd have to consult your automounter
>
> docs. As most usb sticks are fat32, they don't actually have
>
> permissions, so what you are seeing is a posix permission emulation
>
> layer in the vfat fs driver, which is controlled by mount flags.
>
>
>
> However, and a bigger problem, is that when you make a share on a
>
> mount point and the connect to it, smbd will tend to lock the mount
>
> point and you won't be able to cleanly unmount the disk without
>
> manually killing the smbd process that has it locked.
>
>
>
> What I have done in the past is to share out /media with the "force
>
> user" option so that access to the usb disks is done as my desktop
>
> login user. As I recall, this locks /media but not /media/Personal1
>
> so that issue is resolved. The force user option is a lot easier to
>
> deal with than automounters. And sharing /media means all your usb
>
> drives will work without adding a share for each one. you also get
>
> cd/dvd-rom sharing.
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] USB Drive Permissions?

2011-10-04 Thread Chris Weiss
search this page for "force user"
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html


On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:15 PM,   wrote:
> Hi Chris:
> Thanks for the help. I will investigate the automounter documentation re:
> filesystem types and permissions.
> Can you help me understand what "Force user" mode is?
> I am going to try to share /media with "User" authentication mode.
> Thanks again
>
> On , Chris Weiss  wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Oleksinski nolek...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I just installed Samba on my Karmic box and I am trying to share a USB
>> > drive
>>
>> > that has been mounted to /media/Personal1.
>>
>> > 1) It is owned by noleks (me)
>>
>> > 2) Its permissions are 700, unchangeable (?)
>>
>>
>>
>> To change default permissions, you'd have to consult your automounter
>>
>> docs.  As most usb sticks are fat32, they don't actually have
>>
>> permissions, so what you are seeing is a posix permission emulation
>>
>> layer in the vfat fs driver, which is controlled by mount flags.
>>
>>
>>
>> However, and a bigger problem, is that when you make a share on a
>>
>> mount point and the connect to it, smbd will tend to lock the mount
>>
>> point and you won't be able to cleanly unmount the disk without
>>
>> manually killing the smbd process that has it locked.
>>
>>
>>
>> What I have done in the past is to share out /media with the "force
>>
>> user" option so that access to the usb disks is done as my desktop
>>
>> login user.  As I recall, this locks /media but not /media/Personal1
>>
>> so that issue is resolved.  The force user option is a lot easier to
>>
>> deal with than automounters.  And sharing /media means all your usb
>>
>> drives will work without adding a share for each one.  you also get
>>
>> cd/dvd-rom sharing.
>>
>>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] USB Drive Permissions?

2011-10-04 Thread noleksin

Hi Chris:
Thanks for the help. I will investigate the automounter documentation re:  
filesystem types and permissions.

Can you help me understand what "Force user" mode is?
I am going to try to share /media with "User" authentication mode.
Thanks again

On , Chris Weiss  wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Oleksinski nolek...@gmail.com>  
wrote:


> I just installed Samba on my Karmic box and I am trying to share a USB  
drive



> that has been mounted to /media/Personal1.



> 1) It is owned by noleks (me)



> 2) Its permissions are 700, unchangeable (?)





To change default permissions, you'd have to consult your automounter



docs. As most usb sticks are fat32, they don't actually have



permissions, so what you are seeing is a posix permission emulation



layer in the vfat fs driver, which is controlled by mount flags.





However, and a bigger problem, is that when you make a share on a



mount point and the connect to it, smbd will tend to lock the mount



point and you won't be able to cleanly unmount the disk without



manually killing the smbd process that has it locked.





What I have done in the past is to share out /media with the "force



user" option so that access to the usb disks is done as my desktop



login user. As I recall, this locks /media but not /media/Personal1



so that issue is resolved. The force user option is a lot easier to



deal with than automounters. And sharing /media means all your usb



drives will work without adding a share for each one. you also get



cd/dvd-rom sharing.



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Fwd: Win 7 Pro

2011-10-04 Thread Harry Jede
On 19:40:52 wrote sa...@printflow.eu:
> I added WINS server to my DHCP config and  now I join domain. THX ! I
> did not undo settings from http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
> to check. I will try with next machine in about week. This page also
> noted that registry setting is not needed with patch from MS witch
> seems be instaled.
> 
> This led me to other question, I have two PDCs on my network for two
> companies. If I set both WINS server in DHCP setting may I expect it
> will work? Does w7 checks both of them?
You should have *one and only one* WINS-Server per ethernet segment. 
WINS use broadcasts.


-- 

Regards
Harry Jede
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] USB Drive Permissions?

2011-10-04 Thread Chris Weiss
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Nicholas Oleksinski  wrote:
> I just installed Samba on my Karmic box and I am trying to share a USB drive
> that has been mounted to /media/Personal1.
> 1) It is owned by noleks (me)
> 2) Its permissions are 700, unchangeable (?)

To change default permissions, you'd have to consult your automounter
docs.  As most usb sticks are fat32, they don't actually have
permissions, so what you are seeing is a posix permission emulation
layer in the vfat fs driver, which is controlled by mount flags.

However, and a bigger problem, is that when you make a share on a
mount point and the connect to it, smbd will tend to lock the mount
point and you won't be able to cleanly unmount the disk without
manually killing the smbd process that has it locked.

What I have done in the past is to share out /media with the "force
user" option so that access to the usb disks is done as my desktop
login user.  As I recall, this locks /media but not /media/Personal1
so that issue is resolved.  The force user option is a lot easier to
deal with than automounters.  And sharing /media means all your usb
drives will work without adding a share for each one.  you also get
cd/dvd-rom sharing.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] LDAP: Mixing local and LDAP-Users

2011-10-04 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 04-10-2011 04:16, Daniel Müller wrote:
> When you use LDAP?! Why do you need local users and ldap users?
> Just you need LDAP that’s all.

I'm pretty sure different networks have differents demands.

This is not "one rule fit them all".

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel 
Tecnologia da Informação (TI) - Complexo Pequeno Príncipe
http://www.pequenoprincipe.org.br/T: +55 41 3310 1747
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=HJdF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] USB Drive Permissions?

2011-10-04 Thread Nicholas Oleksinski
Here comes a newbie question...

I just installed Samba on my Karmic box and I am trying to share a USB drive
that has been mounted to /media/Personal1.

It's not working now even though I see it as a listed share.  So I went
through the 'Samba Checklist'.  The tmp share worked immediately, which
leads me to think that this has something to do with the ownership and
permissions on the USB drive.

1) It is owned by noleks (me)
2) Its permissions are 700, unchangeable (?)

Has anyone else dealt with such an issue?  It's gotta be easy.  I've been
around Linux enough to know when I'm missing something. :)

Thanks
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 Permission

2011-10-04 Thread Mike
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Daniel Müller wrote:

> For every share in samba4 login as administator from a windows client. Give
> your rights according to your
> groups and users as you would for an windows ads server that’s all. Working
> for me.
>
> Greetings
> Daniel
>

Daniel,
Thank you for writing.
Assume I have completed a new server installation, what commands are used in
Samba4 to create the users,groups, and various share 'masks'.
Best regards,
Mike
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] ctdb issues

2011-10-04 Thread Lydia Heck


Hi,

it is:

1.102pre-126.el5_6.6 local-rhels5.7-x86_64-Server

However before the upgrade - where I am sure the kexec-tools were not at a level 
higher than this, ctdb worked perfectly fine.


What is there I could do?

Lydia




On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:


Hai,

which version is kexec-tools?
should be 2.0.0-45 or higher.
( link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683769 )

Louis



-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lydia.h...@durham.ac.uk
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Lydia Heck
Verzonden: 2011-10-04 13:41
Aan: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: [Samba] ctdb issues


I have been running ctdb on our cluster for ~6 months to serve
a gpfs filesystem
over nfs. It has been running a treat :) !

Recently the servers were upgraded to redhat 5.7 and ctdb-1.0.112-1.el5
is part of the package list. Since the upgrade the log file is
filled with
messages

2011/10/04 12:35:37.933801 [ 1779]: basename: missing operand
2011/10/04 12:35:37.933850 [ 1779]: Try `basename --help' for
more information.
2011/10/04 12:35:48.332844 [ 1779]: basename: missing operand
2011/10/04 12:35:48.332900 [ 1779]: Try `basename --help' for
more information.



I have tried to start a more recent version of ctdb but have
failed to make that
work with my present configuration. I would like to keep with
the packaged
version, as it is very much easier to maintain. Any idea what
I can do to get
rid of this ?

Lydia

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Fwd: Win 7 Pro

2011-10-04 Thread John Drescher
> This led me to other question, I have two PDCs on my network for two
> companies. If I set both WINS server in DHCP setting may I expect it will
> work? Does w7 checks both of them?
>

That one I can not help you with. I have 1 PDC and multiple BDCs on
the same network and domain for the last decade.

John
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] ctdb issues

2011-10-04 Thread L . P . H . van Belle
Hai, 

which version is kexec-tools? 
should be 2.0.0-45 or higher. 
( link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683769 ) 

Louis
 

>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>Van: lydia.h...@durham.ac.uk 
>[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Lydia Heck
>Verzonden: 2011-10-04 13:41
>Aan: samba@lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: [Samba] ctdb issues
>
>
>I have been running ctdb on our cluster for ~6 months to serve 
>a gpfs filesystem 
>over nfs. It has been running a treat :) !
>
>Recently the servers were upgraded to redhat 5.7 and ctdb-1.0.112-1.el5
>is part of the package list. Since the upgrade the log file is 
>filled with 
>messages
>
>2011/10/04 12:35:37.933801 [ 1779]: basename: missing operand
>2011/10/04 12:35:37.933850 [ 1779]: Try `basename --help' for 
>more information.
>2011/10/04 12:35:48.332844 [ 1779]: basename: missing operand
>2011/10/04 12:35:48.332900 [ 1779]: Try `basename --help' for 
>more information.
>
>
>
>I have tried to start a more recent version of ctdb but have 
>failed to make that 
>work with my present configuration. I would like to keep with 
>the packaged 
>version, as it is very much easier to maintain. Any idea what 
>I can do to get 
>rid of this ?
>
>Lydia
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] ctdb issues

2011-10-04 Thread Lydia Heck


I have been running ctdb on our cluster for ~6 months to serve a gpfs filesystem 
over nfs. It has been running a treat :) !


Recently the servers were upgraded to redhat 5.7 and ctdb-1.0.112-1.el5
is part of the package list. Since the upgrade the log file is filled with 
messages


2011/10/04 12:35:37.933801 [ 1779]: basename: missing operand
2011/10/04 12:35:37.933850 [ 1779]: Try `basename --help' for more information.
2011/10/04 12:35:48.332844 [ 1779]: basename: missing operand
2011/10/04 12:35:48.332900 [ 1779]: Try `basename --help' for more information.



I have tried to start a more recent version of ctdb but have failed to make that 
work with my present configuration. I would like to keep with the packaged 
version, as it is very much easier to maintain. Any idea what I can do to get 
rid of this ?


Lydia

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Anyone can create empty files (v 3.5.11)

2011-10-04 Thread Dan Carpenter
Just a follow up incase someone else runs into this problem.  It
turns out this was a bug in the cifs driver.  I submitted a patch to
fix this.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-cifs&m=131715894203568&w=2

regards,
dan carpenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Fwd: Win 7 Pro

2011-10-04 Thread samba
I added WINS server to my DHCP config and  now I join domain. THX ! I 
did not undo settings from http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 to 
check. I will try with next machine in about week. This page also noted 
that registry setting is not needed with patch from MS witch seems be 
instaled.


This led me to other question, I have two PDCs on my network for two 
companies. If I set both WINS server in DHCP setting may I expect it 
will work? Does w7 checks both of them?


Oto

On 2011-10-04 0:57, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 13:51 -0400, John Drescher wrote:

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:46 PM,  wrote:

On 2011-10-03 19:40, John Drescher wrote:

Is there anything else I may try ?

Make sure you have your WINS settings in your windows 7 client so that
the client can find the PDC.

Any hint in this ? In ipconfig I see only WINS proxy disabled.


I usually set the PDC as a WINS server and add that to the windows
client. Or make sure your DNS servers have the PDC records so the
windows client can find the PDC.

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/does-samba-pdc-need-dns-544436/

I'm sorry, but almost every suggestion in that forum post is wrong.

If you are joining Windows 7 to Samba (3.x) domain controllers, follow
our official instructions:  http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7

Andrew Bartlett



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] LDAP: Mixing local and LDAP-Users

2011-10-04 Thread Daniel Müller
Hi,
When you use LDAP?! Why do you need local users and ldap users?
Just you need LDAP that’s all.

---
EDV Daniel Müller

Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen

Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
---

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im 
Auftrag von Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2011 23:46
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] LDAP: Mixing local and LDAP-Users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi Denis,

On 18-09-2011 17:18, Denis Witt wrote:
> is it possible to mix local and LDAP-Users? Especially I need to
> know if it's possible to use an LDAP-Group (like the group that
> is mapped to Domain Administrators) together with an local user.

It is, but you aren't going to do that with "standard" tools. :-)


> (If I use "adduser $username $ldap-group" the group isn't found,
> even if the group is shown using "getent group".)

Just go to LDAP Group and use the member attribute to add your
user.  Depend if you are using rfc2703bis or not that may vary.

Once LDAP reports the user is present in the group, the system
should do the rest. :)


> If this isn't possible, is there a way to map more than one
> group to the rid=512 (ntgroup="Domain Admins")?

That's also possible, you should use 'net groupmap'

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel 
Tecnologia da Informação (TI) - Complexo Pequeno Príncipe
http://www.pequenoprincipe.org.br/T: +55 41 3310 1747
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=9yjd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba