Re: [Samba] SMB slow by design?
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:56:25 -0800 On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:47:59AM -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: I don't know why, but I just tried this, removind the SNDBUF AND RCVBUF, and the file share does seem snappier. I had never messed with these options, I just found several places that said setting these to 8192 gave a performance increase, so I had always used them. Not any more. The trouble with the Internet is that really old advice never dies :-). I just looked in my own config files and found: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF. Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first place. Should any of the others be removed as well? Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street Austin, TX 78701-1755 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgpaPKHj5fIEM.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [opensuse] Open-source leader leaving Novell for Google
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 22:02:32 -0800 It's true I'm leaving Novell, but why do you think this means I'm not going to be on any Samba lists ? I'm joining Google on 2nd Jan, and believe me when I tell you they're *very* interested in me spending all my time on Samba :-) :-). I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the folks in Redmond or is there more to it than that? Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street Austin, TX 78701-1755 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgp6DrKDC0Ol2.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [opensuse] Open-source leader leaving Novell for Google
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:42:03 -0800 On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:54:52PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote: I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the folks in Redmond or is there more to it than that? Not everything is about Microsoft :-). No, as far as I can tell they (and I) have no interest in poking Redmond, they're just very interested in Samba. What I really meant is Why are they very interested in Samba? I'm having a hard time imagining the Samba-based offering that Google might have in mind, but the idea is intriguing enough that I can't stop thinking about it. Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street Austin, TX 78701-1755 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgpGf56a0nmQP.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Migrating an existing NT domain to samba
What is the best path to follow to migrate an existing NT domain to a Samba server. I've got several other Samba domains elsewhere, but none of them started as NT domains so I didn't have to do a migration. The existing network has several servers, all of which I intend to retire from fileservice once this migration is finished. At the moment I have my samba server on the network in a bogus domain and of course there's no useful communication. The samba server is set up to use LDAP and is running 3.0.13 under Mandriva. Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgphoMaqmyrd9.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] badly mangled names from certain old apps
I just took on a new client who is having a curious problem with mangled names. Here's the history as I understand it: Originally they were on an NT server and there was no issue. My predecessor moved them to a samba server running on gentwo. I do not know what version of samba or how he moved the data, but when he did so, any files and folders with more than 8 characters started appearing mangled from two and only two apps. Those two apps are qbtimer (Quickbooks) and RAM Structural System. I have moved them to a new server running 3.0.13 under Mandriva. The file names still appear mangled. Examples of how they are mangled: Engineering - EHTEC6~Q MSWord Templates- MLLW2U~K The apps are running under XP and my user swears they didn't have a problem under the old NT server. My assumption is that these two apps are using an old broken API, but if it really worked fine to an NT server, then there must be something better we can do...if we just get more standard looking 8.3 mangling, that would help. Any ideas? Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgpsETxKCBQVe.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] badly mangled names from certain old apps
I just took on a new client who is having a curious problem with mangled names. Here's the history as I understand it: Originally they were on an NT server and there was no issue. My predecessor moved them to a samba server running on gentwo. I do not know what version of samba or how he moved the data, but when he did so, any files and folders with more than 8 characters started appearing mangled from two and only two apps. Those two apps are qbtimer (Quickbooks) and RAM Structural System. I have moved them to a new server running 3.0.13 under Mandriva. The file names still appear mangled. Examples of how they are mangled: Engineering - EHTEC6~Q MSWord Templates- MLLW2U~K The apps are running under XP and my user swears they didn't have a problem under the old NT server. My assumption is that these two apps are using an old broken API, but if it really worked fine to an NT server, then there must be something better we can do...if we just get more standard looking 8.3 mangling, that would help. Any ideas? Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgp1Pp0VZZzHJ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba domain an many sites
From: spiv007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:34:28 -0400 Im going to install a samba domain at 4 of my sites but I trying to take of the best way to do this. going to have siteA, siteBm, siteC, and siteD. There will be an ipsec between all sites. In the past if i had to do a setup like that would to a box at each site and from there I would make rsync the samba passwd file to all the sites to keep logins in sync. Is there a better ways to to this? Keep in mind if make a central db lets say at siteA, I dont want to down if siteA loses its internet connection. I would want to be able it function fine if I move internet at any of those locations. Set up a master LDAP server at one site and slave LDAP servers at the others and use slurpd to distribute the data, then just point the samba server to the local ldap server. The only tricky part I can think of is that you'll have to make sure all four sites use the same SID. Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180http://www.trinsics.com Would you rather proactively pay for uptime or reactively pay for downtime? Trinsic Solutions Your Proactive IT Management Partner pgp1140rTh6qc.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] multiple users from the same machine?
I'm concerned about the machine known as accountingii in the below smbstatus: Samba version 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1326 PID Username Group Machine --- 2727 bbeerman users bbeerman1(10.2.240.172) 30957 llawrence users df2x1121 (10.2.240.190) 28942 btalbot users dc2x1121 (10.2.240.174) 7750 btalbot users accountingii (10.2.240.147) 30607 mmerriam users marklaptop2 (10.2.240.185) 10434 btalbot users accounting3 (10.2.240.131) 7750 kpottsusers accountingii (10.2.240.147) 31273 bjamesusers product1 (10.2.240.173) 7750 btalbot users accountingii (10.2.240.147) 31394 mlugo users border01 (10.2.240.188) 1566 btalbot users accountingiii (10.2.240.134) Service pid machine Connected at --- pfw-import2727 bbeerman1 Thu Sep 9 09:52:03 2004 accounting1566 accountingiii Thu Sep 9 09:00:41 2004 accounting2727 bbeerman1 Thu Sep 9 09:52:03 2004 IPC$ 10434 accounting3 Tue Sep 7 08:04:04 2004 IPC$ 7750 accountingii Fri Sep 3 16:41:57 2004 local-soft2727 bbeerman1 Thu Sep 9 09:52:03 2004 accounting 30957 df2x1121 Thu Sep 9 06:35:26 2004 IPC$ 30607 marklaptop2 Thu Sep 9 06:12:19 2004 kpotts7750 accountingii Thu Sep 9 09:45:41 2004 accounting7750 accountingii Thu Sep 9 09:45:54 2004 software 2727 bbeerman1 Thu Sep 9 09:52:03 2004 IPC$ 28942 dc2x1121 Tue Aug 17 10:43:43 2004 bbeerman 2727 bbeerman1 Thu Sep 9 09:51:17 2004 mmerriam 30607 marklaptop2 Thu Sep 9 06:11:44 2004 groups2727 bbeerman1 Thu Sep 9 09:52:03 2004 software 1566 accountingiii Thu Sep 9 09:00:41 2004 mlugo31394 border01 Thu Sep 9 07:02:53 2004 btalbot 1566 accountingiii Thu Sep 9 09:00:32 2004 IPC$ 7750 accountingii Thu Sep 9 08:40:18 2004 HumanResou7750 accountingii Thu Sep 9 09:45:40 2004 IPC$ 1566 accountingiii Thu Sep 9 09:01:03 2004 accounting 31394 border01 Thu Sep 9 07:03:04 2004 bjames 31273 product1 Thu Sep 9 06:52:07 2004 llawrence30957 df2x1121 Thu Sep 9 06:35:07 2004 Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 1566 DENY_WRITE 0x2019f RDWR NONE /export/accounting/GLedger/Border/BETBINV.XLS Thu Sep 9 10:20:48 2004 31273 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /home/bjames/My Documents/Product/Price Protection/VPD price protection (master list) 04.xls Thu Sep 9 10:16:59 2004 1566 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE /export/accounting/GLedger/Alaska/COGS/COGS0804.xls Thu Sep 9 10:20:29 2004 31273 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /home/bjames/My Documents/Product/Game Buys/September/gamebuySEP.2004.xls Thu Sep 9 07:07:41 2004 You'll note that it claims that btalbot is logged on twice and kpotts once from the same machine. ps shows that PID 7750 is owned by kpotts: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND kpotts7750 0.0 3.0 10564 3788 ?SSep03 1:33 /usr/sbin/smbd3 - What triggered us to notice this was that btalbot was having errors on one of the other machines in accessing an excel file (she wasn't specific on what happened; she thought the same problem we had before was a good enough description ~sigh~). An investigation into the event log on accountingii showed that this morning at 9:30 there was an error with the printer that claimed the user was btalbot although kpotts was logged in at the time! Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpB9qyrXdVfC.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:25:23 -0500 Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to my customer site tonight and if they don't see any issues when the get back to work on Tuesday, I'll declare this fixed by Wednesday. It took me a few extra days to declare it fixed, but one of our unhappiest users just reported that he hasn't had any problems all week long! Thanks again, Jeremy! Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpKcTrM2cj2k.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:54:58 -0700 Ok, I've fixed up the smbldap_search code and added a max sleep replication time of 5 seconds. I've committed to 3.0 svn if you want to try it. This should fix the issue you've reported here. Let me know if not Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to my customer site tonight and if they don't see any issues when the get back to work on Tuesday, I'll declare this fixed by Wednesday. Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the beer that I owe you. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpEXmfGfG8ir.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:34:17 -0700 Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the beer that I owe you. I might just take you up on that. :-). That's one of the beauties of open source software. If I found a bug in commercial software, I don't think I could pay for the fix by promising to buy someone a beer at an uncertain date in the future. Besides, who wants to drink a beer with Bill Gates? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpyX05EhYgir.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:27:31 -0700 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me th e error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporar y file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Ok, while I'm looking at the code, here's something that Andreas Haumer sent me about a related problem. But we did another test and we now know it has something to do with the version of MS Office: the error only occurs with (old) Excel from Office97, it does not occur with Excel from Office2003! I can't explain what is going on here, but maybe that's a hint for others having the same problem I was wondering what Excel version you're using ? I'm using Excel 2000, but we've also seen it with Excel 2003. Sorry. (I'm still trying to get a new debug log for you.) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpy8AWzd4Y0n.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700 Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes but kernel oplocks = no oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes Also. I'm starting to think it may be an interaction between Linux kernel oplocks and deferred opens. I just had a lockup with these values. This one hung and then gave me the error that the file couldn't be saved and was instead saved to a temporary file. I'm still running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1287. smbstatus is showing two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 24074 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 24074 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/DAD28750 Tue Jun 29 14:56:36 2004 Logging was not at level 10, so this is what I got (the hang was between 14:56:36 and 14:57:54), so I think there's nothing useful in here. [2004/06/29 14:56:36, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service cwg initially as user cwg (uid=200, gid=203) (pid 24074) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) [2004/06/29 14:57:54, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service cwg initially as user cwg (uid=200, gid=203) (pid 23708) [2004/06/29 15:00:46, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object) Do you want another debug level 10 report? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpdCs8LMJY4M.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
inherit = Yes browseable = No [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /home/samba/print map acl inherit = Yes [software] comment = Master Software Share path = /export/software/ms read only = No create mask = 0644 force create mode = 0640 force directory mode = 0750 map acl inherit = Yes veto files = /.?*/.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/.Parent/Icon?/Desktop/DesktopFolderDB/ oplocks = Yes [lp1] comment = HP 1300 Printer path = /var/spool/samba guest ok = Yes printable = Yes The test case that I'm running is in the [homes] share. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpASax71B6su.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700 Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to control the action of the defer open code. It's called defer sharing violations and it's set to yes by default (to emulate Windows correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing if the problem goes away. Thanks! I hope I can get to this in the next few days. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgprWPXPa3BBV.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:55:03 -0700 Ok, Chris - if you svn update you'll find I've added a new global parameter to control the action of the defer open code. It's called defer sharing violations and it's set to yes by default (to emulate Windows correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing if the problem goes away. I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes. I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works there. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp92Bt5uS0CU.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:01:55 -0500 I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes. I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works there. It just failed differently. Now after I tell it to go ahead and overwrite, it hangs before trying to write the file and when it finally comes back it says: 'U:\bbu projection.xls' cannot be accessed. The file may be read-only, or you may be trying to access a read-only location. Or, the server the file is stored on may not be responding. What a terribly written error message...not to mention that I can't believe they can't tell the difference between a read-only file and the server not responding. I had logging back down to 1 and this appeared in the log: [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service groups initially as user cwg (uid=200 , gid=100) (pid 731) [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) callisto (10.1.1.186) connect to service groups initially as user cwg (uid=200 , gid=100) (pid 731) [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:02:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(830) oplock_break: end of file from client oplock_break failed for file bbu projection.xls (dev = 809, inode = 1570136, file_id = 23). [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(923) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service groups [2004/06/28 11:04:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) callisto (10.1.1.186) closed connection to service cwg Chris P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpfnOVureQLr.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:23 -0700 P.S. I've turned oplocks off on the customer's server. Am I correct in thinking that will mask the problem so they won't see it? Yes, it will. Are you sure you're running the SVN code. I did fix a bug recently (friday I think) that would cause a client to get a double return from a rename which might have caused that. Unless it's that, it doesn't look like a deferred open problem. My customer is running a week-old SVN, I'm running one from this morning. Sounds like I should put this morning's SVN on their machine and leave oplocks off. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpdU3iE09nJG.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:20:40 -0700 I can't reproduce this :-(. I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpqKsOz2ZSXu.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500 I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at: http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail I just had exactly the same thing happen again. Since it was identical, I'm not going to post the log. However, this time I ran smbstatus while it was hung and noticed two locks on the temporary file: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 2106 DENY_NONE 0x60080 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/EC94B140 Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 2106 DENY_ALL 0x7019f RDWR NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/EC94B140 Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 2106 DENY_NONE 0x30089 RDONLY NONE /net/jupiter.trinsics.com/export/home/cwg/bbu projection.xls Fri Jun 25 09:19:33 2004 In fact, I see that there are still two locks even after excel let me work again. I hope this is all useful, Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpiPXtyh2PsO.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base=ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com scope=2 filter=((objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(gidNumber=99)) where group 99 is the nobody group. I'm assuming as a result that this error is a red herring. I really need some guidance here. I've got some pretty frustrated users who don't even want to tell me when they're having problems any more. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpu11R9tAzPJ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:04:37 -0500 From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base=ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com scope=2 filter=((objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(gidNumber=99)) where group 99 is the nobody group. I'm assuming as a result that this error is a red herring. I really need some guidance here. I've got some pretty frustrated users who don't even want to tell me when they're having problems any more. ~sigh~ It looks like my second message got posted to the list, but not my first (probably because I included the original user complaint as an attachment), so I'm going to restate it differently. I'm now running 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1202 which I built this weekend. It solved some of the issues we've been seeing, but we're still getting reports of delays while trying to open files of over a minute. The message I originally forwarded mentioned twice this morning. Here's the server log for that user with the above mentioned LDAP search failures removed since they appear to be unrelated (they happen much more often than the problem and nobody complains when they do happen): [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:37:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 07:38:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_netsec_process(1400) failed to decode PDU [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_request_pdu(605) process_request_pdu: failed to do schannel processing. [2004/06/24 07:38:14, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service profiles initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 30493) [2004/06/24 07:38:31, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) product1 (10.2.240.173) closed connection to service profiles [2004/06/24 07:38:32, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service netlogon initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 30493) [2004/06/24 07:38:34, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service bjames initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 30493) [2004/06/24 07:40:00, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) product1 (10.2.240.173) closed connection to service netlogon [2004/06/24 08:24:41, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service bjames initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 20578) [2004/06/24 08:50:08, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(833) product1 (10.2.240.173) closed connection to service bjames [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2004/06/24 09:10:46, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) [2004/06/24 09:10:48, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) product1 (10.2.240.173) connect to service bjames initially as user bjames (uid=514, gid=100) (pid 10715) [2004/06/24 09:19:45, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1055) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 20578 on port 4027 for dev = 811, inode = 541045, file_id = 23 [2004/06/24 09:19:45, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(731) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by process 20578 after break ! For file My Documents/Product/Game Buys/July/gamebuyJULY.2004.xls, dev = 811, inode = 541045. Deleting it to continue... [2004/06/24 09:19:45
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:02:07 -0700 On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:00:48AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: ~sigh~ Thanks, but neither the server nor the switch are showing any netw ork problems. Hell, we aren't even seeing any collisions on the server: Ok, so can you reproduce this ? Are you using latest svn code ? If you can reproduce this at will please tell me how and I'll look at it immediately. I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpl3b1c6X7e8.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500 I haven't been able to reproduce it yet. Got it! Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch. When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over itself. Say that you want to save the file over itself. Things go to hell. I just did this on a W2K box and my co-worker did it on an XP box. I don't know how long lunch has to be. We had Thai. (Stir fried red herring!) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpfZ3UZ5VCSz.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:48:43 -0700 Ok, thanks. A couple of questions. What MS-Office version ? What Samba code version (is this current svn code) ? What is your platform ? What oplock settings do you have in your smb.conf ? I'm running Excel 2K on Win2k. Samba was built this base weekend from SVN (3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1202). The server is mandrake Linux kernel 2.4.22-30mdk. kernel oplocks = Yes oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No Oplocks settings have been changed repeatedly as we've tried to figure things out. I intend to turn them back on again. (What is your favourite color, what is the flight speed of a fully laden sparrow... :-) ? Blueno red. African or European? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpTamrUQ56Cx.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] slow setup time
I'm seeing some very slow setup times.
Here's what I did. I started ethereal while things were running fine and then
I waited until my windows box didn't show up in findsmb (I have keepalive
set to yes, so I don't see why it times out at all). I then went
into My computer which was very slow. When I look in ethereal, I see some
interesting nubmers in the SMB Service Resonse Time statistics:
43 Echo1 1206.4981206.4981206.498
115 Session Setup AndX 10 0.0 1265.183127.83241
I'm running 3.0.5pre1 with LDAP. Any ideas what might be taking so long? Here's
the global section of my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = TRINSICS
encrypt passwords = Yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
log file = /var/log/samba3/%m.log
log level = 1
max log size = 2500
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELA
Y SO_KEEPALIVE
keepalive = yes
min protocol = NT1
interfaces = eth0 127.0.0.1
bind interfaces only = yes
domain logons = Yes
local master = Yes
security = user
encrypt passwords = Yes
logon script = login.bat
logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon drive = U:
logon home = \\%L\%U
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g users -s /bin/false
-M %u
os level = 127
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
kernel oplocks = Yes
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
map to guest = Bad User
load printers = No
min print space = 32768
delete veto files = Yes
# define the DN to use when binding to the directory servers
# The password for this DN is not stored in smb.conf. Rather it
# must be set by using 'smbpasswd -w secretpw' to store the
# passphrase in the secrets.tdb file. If the ldap admin dn values
# change, this password will need to be reset.
ldap admin dn = cn=wheel,o=trinsics,c=us
# Define the SSL option when connecting to the directory
# ('off', 'start tls', or 'on' (default))
ldap ssl = on
# syntax: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://server-name[:port]
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1
# smbpasswd -x delete the entire dn-entry
ldap delete dn = no
# Trust UNIX account information in LDAP
# (see the smb.conf manpage for details)
# specify the base DN to use when searching the directory
ldap suffix = dc=trinsics,dc=com
# the machine and user suffix added to the base suffix
# wrote WITHOUT quotes. NULL suffixes by default
ldap user suffix = ou=people
ldap group suffix = ou=group
ldap machine suffix = ou=people
# generally the default ldap search filter is ok
# ldap filter = ((uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))
# When the user changes his password, update ntPassword,
# lmPassword and the password fields.
ldap passwd sync = Yes
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't
learned anything.
pgpZbu4tMudY1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] File already in use?
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:47:25 -0700 Ok, this behaviour is familiar. I think this may be the 1 second deferred open behaviour. I know how to fix this, just haven't coded this up yet as it's tricky. If I do code up a fix would you be willing to try a test version of Samba 3.0.x ? I would. I get calls about this from users several times per day! Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpTtgxFU0Jba.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] File already in use?
Hi, I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use when we know it isn't. (BTW, there's a typo on the man page under lock spin count. acquired, not aquired.) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0Yu4J1SVT3.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] File already in use?
From: Andreas Haumer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:12:19 +0200 Hi! Chris Garrigues wrote: Hi, I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use when we know it isn't. We seem to have similar problems! (see my mail with subject Share violation on file error from yesterday) So far I've got no reply from the list. I tried to play a little bit with oplock configurations (disable oplocks for some file pattern, completely disable oplocks for the shares) but it doesn't seem to help... :-( I don't know what's going on. Currently I suspect the virus scanners doing some strange things, but I have no prove for this theory. I don't have the virus scanning enabled. My understanding is that oplocks doesn't actually have anything to do with locking and has much more to do with caching. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpHXhjUZQlIG.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] File already in use?
From: Rashkae [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 11:02:35 -0400 I would start with smbstatus to see what workstation/user has the file open. None. -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp4mfaNSVzUC.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] File already in use?
From: Andreas Haumer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:16:26 +0200 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Rashkae wrote: I would start with smbstatus to see what workstation/user has the file open. So far I was not able to see a file locked by someone else than the workstation/user who was reporting the problem (if any). When I get the problem report, it's usually too late: the user is already able to open the file again. Most of the time when I check the system then, smbstatus does not report this file as locked, and I find these Share violation on file error in the logs. I once had smbstatus reporting the same file a user was reporting as not beeing able to open, and smbstatus told me the _same_ user on the _same_ workstation had the file locked. The user told me he had _not_ opened the file the whole day! Go figure... I just had almost this happen. This time it was a quickbooks user. She got an error message that her connection to the server had been lost (I didn't see this myself). When I looked at smbstatus I saw that she still had locks: Locked files: PidDenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 4191 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE /export/pointmeridian/Accounting/Quickbooks/Point Meridian.QBI Wed May 26 10:10:03 2004 4191 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE /export/pointmeridian/Accounting/Quickbooks/Point Meridian.QBW Wed May 26 10:10:02 2004 When she re-entered quickbooks it gave the usual error that the file was already in use. I restarted samba and it let her in. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp6bLhgfbiL3.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Sluggish server response
s t a n d
v e n d o r s . t x t # êeõfÄé^Á§ÄêeõfÄêeõfÄÊ1 , T 8 3 2 6 5 ~ B . E P S t r i n s i c _ b c t e m p l a t e . e p s ®/÷fÄk©Ý1Ä ®/÷fÄ ®/÷fį , T A F T C 7 ~ 0 . G I F t r i n s i c l o g o _ 1 0 6 x 6 0 . g i f ùfÄk©Ý1Ä ùfÄ ùfÄõ
. T F O L S E ~ Z . G I F t r i n s i c l o g o _ 2 1 6 x 1 2 2 . g i f p§D{ ÄÊûpÌ Ä §D{ Ä §D{ Ä } C a r d . p d f §D{ Äk©Ý1Ä §D{ Ä §D{ Ä , T 8 3 2 6 5 ~ B . P D F t r i n s i c _ b c t e m p l a t e . p d f x§D{ ÄÊûpÌ Ä §D{ Ä §D{ Äñ2 e n v e l o p e . p d f |§D{ ÄÊûpÌ Ä §D{ Ä §D{ Ĭ= L I F R D A ~ J . P D F l e t t e r h e a d . p d f x)úþ1Ä¿ßÍÎ7Ä )úþ1Ä )[EMAIL
PROTECTED] À3nß ]Ï0ð E ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
º
½L2ãÀn¾©~PDp¸ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
º½n¾©~L2ãÀPÐ_Ö õh Ä p 0 J Y Z Z 3 ~ O . P D F 0 4 0 4 0 9 _ G a r r i g u e s , _ S e r v i c e s _ A g r e e m e n t , _ w o r k _ s t a t e m e n t . p d f ¤ :-ª¥
Ä ò0%Ä:-ª¥ Ä:-ª¥ Ä B
F C M 2 Z X T ~ A . D O C C o r e _ N A P _ c r e d i t _ c a r d _ a u t h o _ f o r m . d o c ´ æT]!Ä 9
Í!ÄæT]!ÄæT]!Ä$] T 0 T R U O Y ~ S . P D F 0 4 0 9 1 1 _ G a r r i g u e s ,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|!Ä 9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|!ÄHc f 0 1 P Z F V ~ Y . P D F 0 4 0 4 1 3 _ G a r r i g u e s , _ C o n s u l t i n g _ A g r e e m e n t , _ d r a f t _ 2 . p d f t
åQÄð¤Ä åQÄ
åQÄÂX d e t a i l s . z i p hÝ{þ#Äx
Ý1Ä Ý{þ#Ä Ý{þ#Ä´ y p a d | ×J·Ñ'ÄÚÝ1Ä×J·Ñ'Ä×J·Ñ'Ä 6 R R X 8 Q J ~ T . X L S r o d g e r B i l l . x l s xb aÝ1Ä|M2Ä b aÝ1Ä b aÝ1Ä T A 2 P 9 W F ~ 3 . D O C A C I P h a s e 2 . d o c | Ðg8ÄÿÜ[@ÄÐg8ÄÐg8Ä 8 A H 4 I H T ~ 8 . X L S a u s t i n h o u r s . x l s |M¾ü^7Ä¿ßÍÎ7Ä M¾ü^7Ä M¾ü^7Ä ô T Y 0 G N 5 ~ P . D O C t r i n i s c s . P O . d o c Ì ½_#ð8ÄB):[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
º½n¾¯2L2ãÀPÐ/ï ½_#ð8Ä 4 n R I Z W 3 I ~ H . X L S R e m o t e _ M a n a g e d _ S e r v i c e s - R e v e n u e _ P r o j e c t i o n s _ b r a n d e d . x l s ¤-*ã9ÄF@Ä Úõä9Ä Úõä9Ä ¾ D C 8 9 C Z C ~ T . D O C C A N E L C O _ U . S . _ L E A S E _ A P P L I C A T I O N . d o c ¤ ¥á9ÄB):Ä¥á9Ä¥á9Ä¢
D ~ U S Q K G ~ Z . D O C ~ $ N E L C O _ U . S . _ L E A S E _ A P P L I C A T I O N . d o c x þ±Ðà9ÄB):Äþ±Ðà9Äþ±Ðà9Ä ~ W R L 0 0 0 5 . t m p ¤õÓä*CÄ æ*CÄ ùnÆ,CÄ ùnÆ,CÄ F C 2 M E B B ~ S . D O C C A N E L C O _ U . S . _ P e r s o n a l _ F i n a n c i a l . d o c ¤Ré@Ä b¸Ä Ré@Ä Ré@Ä¢
F ~ K F N F H ~ 6 . D O C ~ $ N E L C O _ U . S . _ P e r s o n a l _ F i n a n c i a l . d o c x ¿@Äù îM=Ä¿@Ä¿@Ä ¦ ~ W R L 2 6 9 8 . t m p ÔÒp =Ä cíM=Ä Òp =Ä Òp =ÄÓ t 0 C T V H A ~ 2 . P D F 0 4 0 5 1 8 _ G a r r i g u e s , _ A l l o c a t i o n _ o f _ l e g a l _ e x p e n s e s _ 2 0 0 4 _ Q 1 . p d f ¨ ðå7
=Ä cíM=Äðå7
=Äðå7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
º½n¾´æL2ãÀPÐf/
=Ä cíM=Äðå7
=Äðå7
=Ä
$ G 0 B 8 0 V ~ H . P D F G a r r i g u e s _ n o t e . p d f ~8
=ÄßíAÄ ~8
=Ä ~8
[EMAIL PROTECTED], _ $ 1 3 0 ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] À3nß ]Ï0ð E ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]
º
½L2ãÀn¾¶¢PDpö Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't
learned anything.
pgpwx8l8WyS6P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows client doesn't show up in findsmb
What does it mean if a windows XP consistently doesn't show up in findsmb even when it does show up in smbstatus? Also, I don't know if this is related or not, but the same machine sometimes shows up in smbstatus with two different PIDs. We've seen this with two different machines, both running XP. Here's smbstatus output (the machine in question is accountingiii): Samba version 3.0.4 PID Username Group Machine --- 3177 btalbot users accountingiii (10.2.240.134) 30059 bbeerman users beermanlaptop (10.2.240.141) 30020 mlugo users border01 (10.2.240.188) 15173 pfwup users acctmax (10.2.240.2) 20338 btalbot users accounting3 (10.2.240.131) 16158 llawrence users df2x1121 (10.2.240.190) 2872 kpottsusers accountingii (10.2.240.147) 11898 apayneusers paynelaptop (10.2.240.143) 26290 btalbot users accountingiii (10.2.240.134) run again a few minutes later: Samba version 3.0.4 PID Username Group Machine --- 30059 bbeerman users beermanlaptop (10.2.240.141) 30020 mlugo users border01 (10.2.240.188) 15173 pfwup users acctmax (10.2.240.2) 20338 btalbot users accounting3 (10.2.240.131) 16158 llawrence users df2x1121 (10.2.240.190) 2872 kpottsusers accountingii (10.2.240.147) 11898 apayneusers paynelaptop (10.2.240.143) 26290 btalbot users accountingiii (10.2.240.134) (Don't let accountingiii and accounting3 confuse you.) -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpDacS9qIE8R.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Sluggish server response
] [2004/05/18 10:28:52, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfilepathinfo(1934) call_trans2qfilepathinfo: SMB_VFS_STAT of È°Tê\200\205 failed (No such file or directory) Here's part of log.nmbd. The client machine at issue here is at 10.1.1.30: [2004/05/18 10:26:21, 3] nmbd/nmbd_serverlistdb.c:write_browse_list(421) write_browse_list: Wrote browse list into file /var/cache/samba3/browse.dat [2004/05/18 10:26:48, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(278) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 11 [2004/05/18 10:26:48, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(278) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 11 [2004/05/18 10:27:01, 3] nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c:process_host_announce(118) process_host_announce: from GANYMEDE00 IP 10.1.1.30 to TRINSICS1d for server GANYMEDE. [2004/05/18 10:27:01, 3] nmbd/nmbd_serverlistdb.c:write_browse_list(421) write_browse_list: Wrote browse list into file /var/cache/samba3/browse.dat [2004/05/18 10:28:08, 3] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_query_request(451) process_name_query_request: Name query from 10.1.1.187 on subnet 10.1.1.1 for name SHREDDER00 -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgpmTqCz4IvOq.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Machine account found and not found in 3.0.2
For the record, the clue was in the Account flags. The account needs to be a machine account, not a user account. Oops. Chris From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:46:56 -0500 Brad, I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of upgraded to 3.0.2 - funkyness in machine accounts while investigating a similar problem. I upgraded to 3.0.2 last week from 3.0.0. I have a system which I just added to the domain successfully. However, when I attempt to log a domain user onto that machine, I get this error: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. and on the server, i get the same log entries you did: [2004/04/10 13:24:22, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: carme$ [2004/04/10 13:24:22, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/04/10 13:24:22, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(218) get_md4pw: Workstation CARME$: no account in domain Have you resolved the problem and if so, how? As with you, the machine account is in ldap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba3]# pdbedit3 -v carme$ Searching for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=TRINSICS))] smbldap_open_connection: connection opened Searching for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=TRINSICS))] smbldap_open_connection: connection opened init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: carme$ Unix username:carme$ NT username: carme$ Account Flags:[U ] User SID: S-1-5-21-904170827-898255731-2295272421-2040 Primary Group SID:S-1-5-21-904170827-898255731-2295272421-513 Full Name:Nancy computer Home Directory: \\jupiter\carme_ HomeDir Drive:U: Logon Script: login.bat Profile Path: \\jupiter\profiles\carme_ Domain: TRINSICS Account desc: Workstations: Munged dial: Logon time: 0 Logoff time: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT Kickoff time: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT Password last set:0 Password can change: 0 Password must change: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT If Brad didn't solve this, I hope someone else has a clue for me. -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Machine account found and not found in 3.0.2
Brad, I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of upgraded to 3.0.2 - funkyness in machine accounts while investigating a similar problem. I upgraded to 3.0.2 last week from 3.0.0. I have a system which I just added to the domain successfully. However, when I attempt to log a domain user onto that machine, I get this error: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. and on the server, i get the same log entries you did: [2004/04/10 13:24:22, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: carme$ [2004/04/10 13:24:22, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/04/10 13:24:22, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(218) get_md4pw: Workstation CARME$: no account in domain Have you resolved the problem and if so, how? As with you, the machine account is in ldap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba3]# pdbedit3 -v carme$ Searching for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=TRINSICS))] smbldap_open_connection: connection opened Searching for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=TRINSICS))] smbldap_open_connection: connection opened init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: carme$ Unix username:carme$ NT username: carme$ Account Flags:[U ] User SID: S-1-5-21-904170827-898255731-2295272421-2040 Primary Group SID:S-1-5-21-904170827-898255731-2295272421-513 Full Name:Nancy computer Home Directory: \\jupiter\carme_ HomeDir Drive:U: Logon Script: login.bat Profile Path: \\jupiter\profiles\carme_ Domain: TRINSICS Account desc: Workstations: Munged dial: Logon time: 0 Logoff time: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT Kickoff time: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT Password last set:0 Password can change: 0 Password must change: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT If Brad didn't solve this, I hope someone else has a clue for me. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] nmbd dying
I have upgraded to 3.0.2a-2mdk in order to solve another issue, but this still
happens about once a day (but not always the same time). Can anybody suggest
a useful debugging strategy?
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:47:02 -0600
nmbd has been dying on me occasionally. I'm running mandrake 9.2 with
samba3-server-3.0.0-2mdk. We've got our users in ldap but I'd seen this
symptom previously when I was using an earlier version of samba that didn't
support ldap. There is nothing useful in the logs and a PS shows a nmb
process still running.
This last time around, I had a ptrace running on both nmbd processes and found
that the parent process was the one still running, but the child process
had died. Here's the end of the ptrace of the child:
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1
ioctl(9, FIONREAD, [81])= 0
recvfrom(9, \t\1\201\200\0\1\0\2\0\0\0\0\vBORDER-ACCT\tbordere..., 1024,
0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)}
, [16]) = 81
close(9)= 0
write(5, BORDER-ACCT\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0..., 88) =
88
read(6, ACCTMAX\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0..., 88) =
88
open(/etc/hosts, O_RDONLY)= 9
fcntl64(9, F_GETFD) = 0
fcntl64(9, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
fstat64(9, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=154, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x40018000
read(9, # Generated automatically from h..., 4096) = 154
read(9, , 4096) = 0
close(9)= 0
munmap(0x40018000, 4096)= 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 9
connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.
0.0.1)}, 28) = 0
send(9, \t\2\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\7ACCTMAX\tborderent\3c..., 39, 0) = 39
gettimeofday({1080304120, 623860}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1
ioctl(9, FIONREAD, [55])= 0
recvfrom(9, \t\2\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\0\0\0\7ACCTMAX\tborderent\3c..., 1024,
0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)
}, [16]) = 55
close(9)= 0
write(5, ACCTMAX\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0..., 88)
= 88
read(6, BARBARA3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0..., 88) =
88
open(/etc/hosts, O_RDONLY)= 9
fcntl64(9, F_GETFD) = 0
fcntl64(9, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
fstat64(9, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=154, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x40018000
read(9, # Generated automatically from h..., 4096) = 154
read(9, , 4096) = 0
close(9)= 0
munmap(0x40018000, 4096)= 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 9
connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.
0.0.1)}, 28) = 0
send(9, \t\3\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\10BARBARA3\tborderent\3..., 40, 0) = 40
gettimeofday({1080325192, 628139}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1
ioctl(9, FIONREAD, [40])= 0
recvfrom(9, \t\3\205\203\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\10BARBARA3\tborderent\3..., 1024
, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1
)}, [16]) = 40
close(9)= 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 9
connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.
0.0.1)}, 28) = 0
send(9, \t\4\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\10BARBARA3\10trinsics\3c..., 39, 0) = 39
gettimeofday({1080325192, 680132}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1
ioctl(9, FIONREAD, [39])= 0
recvfrom(9, \t\4\205\203\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\10BARBARA3\10trinsics\3c..., 102
4, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1
)}, [16]) = 39
close(9)= 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 9
connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.
0.0.1)}, 28) = 0
send(9, \t\5\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\10BARBARA3\0\0\1\0\1, 26, 0) = 26
gettimeofday({1080325192, 698896}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 5000) = 1
ioctl(9, FIONREAD, [26])= 0
recvfrom(9, \t\5\205\203\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\10BARBARA3\0\0\1\0\1, 1024, 0, {
sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)}, [1
6]) = 26
close(9)= 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [PIPE], [FPE USR2], 8) = 0
getpid()= 15056
geteuid32() = 0
getpid()= 15056
geteuid32() = 0
time(NULL) = 1080325192
write(8, 0o\2\1\4cj\4
Re: [Samba] nmbd dying
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:33:06 -0700 On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:07:29AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: I have upgraded to 3.0.2a-2mdk in order to solve another issue, but this still happens about once a day (but not always the same time). Can anybody suggest a useful debugging strategy? read(8, \1 \4\23dc=borderent,dc=com\4\0, 25) = 25 time(NULL) = 1080325192 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [FPE USR2], NULL, 8) = 0 --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGPIPE +++ I'm in over my head on this one. Any idea where I should look next? Looks like you have a bug in your libc somewhere. nmbd always sets SIGPIPE to be ignored (as does smbd). Something is resetting this. glibc-2.3.2-14mdk. Should I switch to the glibc from cooker (glibc-2.3.3-10mdk)? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
From: Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:58:24 +1000 Can you join other computers to the domain? Yes, all the 2000 and XP boxes are fine. It's just this one box. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
From: Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:58:43 +1000 Maybe then your problem isn't samba but your NT box. To confirm this see if you cam remove an existing domain member from the domain and then re-join it. If that works then you have a problem with that NT 4 box and you will probably need to re-build or if it fails then you have a problem with your Samba PDC. Just a way of narrowing down the problem. I suspect it won't surprise you if I say that we've already taken other machines out of the domain and put them back in again. I've never thought it was a samba problem and from the beginning thought that something bogus was cached in the NT box. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
From: Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:11:23 +1000 NT4 box are not known as DC only Win 2K and Win 2003 box are DC's in NT 4 you have a PDC or a BDC and yes you can not have a NT 4 PDC or BDC in a Samba domain. In order for your NT 4 box to be either a PDC or BDC you would have specified it during the install. In order to tell now I would look in the Admin tools on the NT box and see if you can find server manager, open it up and see what it says, it should tell you if you have a PDC or BDC. If your server is a PDC then if you want to join the Samba domain you will need to rebuild it as a member server. Based on the tests that both you and Craig suggested, it appears that the system is *not* a DC. Server manager doesn't say that it's either a PDC or a BDC. Also, my cohort, Jeff, is fairly certain that it wasn't a DC before. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:08:15 -0700 If the option to join a domain is in the network properties, then it is not a domain controller. If there is no option to join the domain, then it was set up as a domain controller. It's not at all ambiguous. Right. The machine is not a domain controller. But the problem is that when we try to add the machine to the domain through that very option, we get the error message that I mentioned in my first email: This computer name is already configured as a domain controller on the domain. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:45:34 -0700 well from your description then, it would seem as though the message is coming from the PDC which I am assuming to be samba. Check /var/log/samba/log.ip_address_of_machine and /var/log/samba/log.NETBIOS_NAME_OF_MACHINE to see if there are any clues. We actually renamed the machine in case something was cached on the server. the IP log file is empty and the NETBIOS name log file only shows traffic from when we've connected while in a workgroup instead of the domain. On your PDC (is it v3 or 2.2.x?) As mentioned before, we upgraded to 3.x and I inadvertently changed the SID of the network in the process. domain logons = yes domain master = yes preferred master = yes security = share os level = ? #not sure if this will cause a problem if less than 32 or so domain logons = Yes local master = Yes security = user os level = 127 preferred master = Yes Note again that all our 2000 and xp boxes are fine. At what point does this error message come - before or after it searches the domain for a duplicate machine account? If it occurs after it searches the domain for another machine with the same name, you may want to delete the machine account from /etc/passwd and /etc/samba/smbpasswd (or whatever backend you are using... smbpasswd -m -x MACHINE_NAME) we're using the LDAP backend and we did that. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:30:43 -0700 samba can't operate as a DC in conjunction with Windows based DC's - With samba 3.0 - 3.0.3pre1 - you can have multiple samba BDC's with a samba PDC but in no other fashion. So how do I tell the NT4 box that it is *not* a DC? I don't understand why it thinks it is one. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] nmbd dying
]) = 1080325192
getpid()= 15056
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {0x402192e0, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x4016aca8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0) = 8
fcntl64(8, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
connect(8, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, path=/dev/log}, 16) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection
refused)
close(8)= 0
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0
getpid()= 15056
geteuid32() = 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 8
setsockopt(8, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0
fcntl64(8, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
fcntl64(8, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
connect(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389), sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)},
16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in progress)
select(1024, NULL, [8], NULL, {30, 0}) = 1 (out [8], left {30, 0})
getpeername(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389),
sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)}, [16]) = 0
fcntl64(8, F_GETFL) = 0x802 (flags O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)
fcntl64(8, F_SETFL, O_RDWR) = 0
getpeername(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389),
sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)}, [16]) = 0
uname({sys=Linux, node=Border.BorderEnt.Com, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1080325192
write(8, 0\f\2\1\1`\7\2\1\3\4\0\200\0, 14) = 14
time(NULL) = 1080325192
select(1024, [8], [], NULL, {30, 0})= 1 (in [8], left {30, 0})
read(8, 0\f\2\1\1a\7\n, 8)= 8
read(8, \1\0\4\0\4\0, 6) = 6
time(NULL) = 1080325192
setsockopt(8, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [0], 4) = 0
fcntl64(8, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
getsockname(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(4256),
sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)}, [16]) = 0
getpeername(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(389),
sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.0.1)}, [16]) = 0
time([1080325192]) = 1080325192
time(NULL) = 1080325192
write(8, 0o\2\1\2cj\4\34ou=Hosts,dc=borderent,d..., 113) = 113
select(1024, [8], [], NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [8])
read(8, 0\37\2\1\2e\32\n, 8) = 8
read(8, \1 \4\23dc=borderent,dc=com\4\0, 25) = 25
time(NULL) = 1080325192
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [FPE USR2], NULL, 8) = 0
--- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGPIPE +++
I'm in over my head on this one. Any idea where I should look next?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't
learned anything.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain
While I wait for an answer to my last question, allow me to ask another. When we upgraded a samba server from 2.x to 3.0.0-2mdk using LDAP, we managed to change the domain SID. Instead of fixing the SIDs on the sever, I re-added the hosts to the domain. Although it was a lot of work, it was successful on most of the systems on the network. However, we have one old NT4 box on the network which will not rejoin the domain. Instead it reports: This computer name is already configured as a domain controller on the domain. We've deleted and re-added the user object for the machine several times. This is what it currently looks like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba3]# pdbedit3 -u ntbox$ -v Unix username:ntbox$ NT username: ntbox$ Account Flags:[ ] User SID: S-1-5-21-3970570929-2603547963-1902127304-2152 Primary Group SID:S-1-5-21-3970570929-2603547963-1902127304-513 Full Name:nt computer Home Directory: \\border\ntbox_ HomeDir Drive:U: Logon Script: login.bat Profile Path: \\border\profiles\ntbox_ Domain: BORDERENT Account desc: Workstations: Munged dial: Logon time: 0 Logoff time: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT Kickoff time: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT Password last set:0 Password can change: 0 Password must change: Mon, 18 Jan 2038 21:14:07 GMT I'm suspecting that the old SID is cached on the NT box somewhere, probably in the registry, but I have no idea where to look. Any ideas? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com 1611-B West 6th Street Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
