Re: [Samba] Files over 4GB not listing properly. Cannot get CIFSworking.

2008-05-06 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 schrieb Matt Boyle:
 Put this in the wrong thread, sorry!
 
 
 UPDATE:  I've realized that this seems to be an issue with the compiler flags 
 used to build samba.
 I've realized that i need to define _LARGEFILE_SOURCE, _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE, 
 and _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.
 
 I've done this, but still have no luck reading files larger than 4GB.  Anyone 
 have suggestions?
 
 Thanks,
 Matt
 
 
  Hi guys,
  
  I'm attempting to move large files (4GB) from a PowerPC-based embedded 
  system running a 2.4 kernel architecture to an PC running a 2.6 kernel. 
  I've got samba compiled, installed, and running on the embedded box. I also 
  have the directories from the PPC system mounted and accessible from the 
  PC. 
  
  I have two problems: larger file sizes do not list correctly, and large 
  files transferred from the embedded box to the PC are not complete; IE 
  they're dropping data along the way. I'm familiar with the 2GB file size 
  limit on samba, and have mounted the PC side using the lfs flag.
  
  Problem 1: Incorrect listing
  
  Here's a list of the directory from the embedded box:
  -r--r--r-- 1 root root 52646396 Jan 5 06:46 file1.ch10
  -r--r--r-- 1 root root 60755936 Jan 5 06:46 file2.ch10
  -r--r--r-- 1 root root 47606684 Jan 5 06:46 file3.ch10
  -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4920604376 Jan 5 05:51 file4.ch10
  
  Here's that same listing, but of the samba mount of that directory on the 
  PC:
  
  -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 52646396 Jan 5 2007 file1.ch10 -r-xr-xr-x 1 
  root root 60755936 Jan 5 2007 file2.ch10 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 
  47606684 Jan 5 2007 file3.ch10 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 625637080 Jan 5 
  2007 file4.ch10
  
  As you can see, files 1-3 list fine, but file4 is showing way short. I'm 
  guessing this might be some sort of overflow condition, any ideas?
  
  Problem 2: Loss of data during transfer of large files.
  When I try to transfer file4, i only get 41 or so of the total 
  file size. This is the more pressing issue.
  
  Also, I cannot mount the samba share using CIFS.  I use the line
  
  mount -t smbfs //server/share/ path/to/local/ -o user=u,pass=p,lfs
  
  to mount with SMBFS, and it works correctly, just doesn't display the large 
  files. 
  However, when using the following:
  
  mount -t smbfs //server/share/ path/to/local/ -o user=u,pass=p,lfs

I guess, that's a typo above, so smbfs should read cifs ?

  
  I get Mount error 5= Input/output error
  

You can do the following on your local PC running a 2.6 kernel to track 
this down a bit more when using the cifs kernel module:

1. 'modinfo cifs' (to query some cifs version and kernel info)
2. 'modprobe cifs' (to make sure the module is loaded)
3. 'echo 3  /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI' (to make cifs more chatty)
4. 'logger HERE-ALL-NEW-STUFF-NOW-='
5. In a separate console, use 'tail -f /var/log/messages' to fetch cifs' msgs
6. use 'mount.cifs //server/share /path/to/local --verbose -o user=u,pass=p'
   (the option lfs is _not_ needed here, not a valid cifs option)

(Usually) there should be cifs debug messages in the 4.) tail -f ... console.
All new entries start at the string
 HERE-ALL-NEW-STUFF-NOW-=

Please send all output from the above steps 1.) 2.) 5.) and 6.)

Cheers, Günter

Note that some of the cmds above need root privs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] XP share not listed in Linneighborhood

2008-04-30 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
 I am unable to find my Windows XP share (winpro) in Linneighborhood 
 which runs on my desktop Kubuntu Linux box.
 
 When I try to mount that Windows XP share I get the error message:
 2139: session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
 2139: session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 SMB connection failed
 smbmt: Error: winpro _not_ mounted.
 
 The command line I'm using to mount Winpro is:
 smbmount //winpro/lba  /mnt/winpro  -o guest,uid=lba
 
 This line _used_ to work before I had a malfuntion on the winpro box and 
 had to Repair XP.  Repair is similiar to a fresh install except many 
 (but not all) settings are kept.
 
 Both winpro and the Kubuntu box are on the same workgroup and subnet
 with fixed IP.
 
 Why is the winpro machine not listening on called name ?
 
 I've been working on this a couple of days and suspect something in the 
 Windows XP configuration but haven't made any headway.
 
 Larry
 
 

Are you sure, that you named that winxp box winpro?
Inside a windows cmdline window, use nbtstat -n to view the
registered netbios names. 
Also have a look whether the workgroup matches.

Btw - using 'smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password' is an easier
way to check for availability of that remote box.

Also 'smbtree' can help to diagnose that problem.

Cheers, Günter

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] XP share not listed in Linneighborhood

2008-04-30 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
 Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  I am unable to find my Windows XP share (winpro) in Linneighborhood 
  which runs on my desktop Kubuntu Linux box.
 
  When I try to mount that Windows XP share I get the error message:
  2139: session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  2139: session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
  SMB connection failed
  smbmt: Error: winpro _not_ mounted.
 
  The command line I'm using to mount Winpro is:
  smbmount //winpro/lba  /mnt/winpro  -o guest,uid=lba
 
  This line _used_ to work before I had a malfuntion on the winpro box and 
  had to Repair XP.  Repair is similiar to a fresh install except many 
  (but not all) settings are kept.
 
  Both winpro and the Kubuntu box are on the same workgroup and subnet
  with fixed IP.
 
  Why is the winpro machine not listening on called name ?
 
  I've been working on this a couple of days and suspect something in the 
  Windows XP configuration but haven't made any headway.
 
  Larry
 
 
  
  Are you sure, that you named that winxp box winpro?
  Inside a windows cmdline window, use nbtstat -n to view the
  registered netbios names. 
  Also have a look whether the workgroup matches.
  
  Btw - using 'smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password' is an easier
  way to check for availability of that remote box.
  
  Also 'smbtree' can help to diagnose that problem.
  
  Cheers, Günter
  
 
 Thanks very much for your reply Günter.
 
 Clicking on Control Panel System Properties shows
 'Full computer name' winpro
 and Workgroup LANET
 as expected.
 
 nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
 gives an error message
 Failed to access NBT driver
 
 smbtree gives a full screen of shares from other computers
 but nothing from winpro.  The shares list other windows 98 computers.
 
 smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password
 gives a '' prompt that I can't do anything with
 except to re-enter my password.
 I then get
 session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
 session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
 smbclient -L winpro -Uusername
 session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
 session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
 Some notes:
 My username and password is the same on both machines.
 
 The WXP computer has Service Pack 1 and 2.
 
 I can connect to shares on other machines from winpro.
 
 Larry
 

Have you enabled NetBIOS over tcp/ip in the tcp/ip settings
of your network interface? I think, it's placed in the
WINS tab dialog page.

Cheers, Günter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] XP share not listed in Linneighborhood

2008-04-30 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
 Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  I am unable to find my Windows XP share (winpro) in Linneighborhood 
  which runs on my desktop Kubuntu Linux box.
 
  When I try to mount that Windows XP share I get the error message:
  2139: session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  2139: session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
  SMB connection failed
  smbmt: Error: winpro _not_ mounted.
 
  The command line I'm using to mount Winpro is:
  smbmount //winpro/lba  /mnt/winpro  -o guest,uid=lba
 
  This line _used_ to work before I had a malfuntion on the winpro box and 
  had to Repair XP.  Repair is similiar to a fresh install except many 
  (but not all) settings are kept.
 
  Both winpro and the Kubuntu box are on the same workgroup and subnet
  with fixed IP.
 
  Why is the winpro machine not listening on called name ?
 
  I've been working on this a couple of days and suspect something in the 
  Windows XP configuration but haven't made any headway.
 
  Larry
 
 
  Are you sure, that you named that winxp box winpro?
  Inside a windows cmdline window, use nbtstat -n to view the
  registered netbios names. 
  Also have a look whether the workgroup matches.
 
  Btw - using 'smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password' is an easier
  way to check for availability of that remote box.
 
  Also 'smbtree' can help to diagnose that problem.
 
  Cheers, Günter
 
  Thanks very much for your reply Günter.
 
  Clicking on Control Panel System Properties shows
  'Full computer name' winpro
  and Workgroup LANET
  as expected.
 
  nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
  gives an error message
  Failed to access NBT driver
 
  smbtree gives a full screen of shares from other computers
  but nothing from winpro.  The shares list other windows 98 computers.
 
  smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password
  gives a '' prompt that I can't do anything with
  except to re-enter my password.
  I then get
  session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
  smbclient -L winpro -Uusername
  session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
  Some notes:
  My username and password is the same on both machines.
 
  The WXP computer has Service Pack 1 and 2.
 
  I can connect to shares on other machines from winpro.
 
  Larry
 
  
  Have you enabled NetBIOS over tcp/ip in the tcp/ip settings
  of your network interface? I think, it's placed in the
  WINS tab dialog page.
  
  Cheers, Günter
  
 
 
 Just looked again Günter.
 Yes, NetBIOS over tcp/ip is checked.
 
 Also iptables on the Linux machine is wide open (all policies ACCEPT).
 The entire internal LAN is behind a router/firewall of course.
 
 Larry
 

Then i don't understand the result from one of your recent posts:
nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
gives an error message
Failed to access NBT driver

Btw - it should read nbtstat -n (sorry, my fault)

Cheers, Günter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] XP share not listed in Linneighborhood

2008-04-30 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
 Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  I am unable to find my Windows XP share (winpro) in Linneighborhood 
  which runs on my desktop Kubuntu Linux box.
 
  When I try to mount that Windows XP share I get the error message:
  2139: session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  2139: session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called 
  name)
  SMB connection failed
  smbmt: Error: winpro _not_ mounted.
 
  The command line I'm using to mount Winpro is:
  smbmount //winpro/lba  /mnt/winpro  -o guest,uid=lba
 
  This line _used_ to work before I had a malfuntion on the winpro box 
  and 
  had to Repair XP.  Repair is similiar to a fresh install except many 
  (but not all) settings are kept.
 
  Both winpro and the Kubuntu box are on the same workgroup and subnet
  with fixed IP.
 
  Why is the winpro machine not listening on called name ?
 
  I've been working on this a couple of days and suspect something in 
  the 
  Windows XP configuration but haven't made any headway.
 
  Larry
 
 
  Are you sure, that you named that winxp box winpro?
  Inside a windows cmdline window, use nbtstat -n to view the
  registered netbios names. 
  Also have a look whether the workgroup matches.
 
  Btw - using 'smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password' is an easier
  way to check for availability of that remote box.
 
  Also 'smbtree' can help to diagnose that problem.
 
  Cheers, Günter
 
  Thanks very much for your reply Günter.
 
  Clicking on Control Panel System Properties shows
  'Full computer name' winpro
  and Workgroup LANET
  as expected.
 
  nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
  gives an error message
  Failed to access NBT driver
 
  smbtree gives a full screen of shares from other computers
  but nothing from winpro.  The shares list other windows 98 computers.
 
  smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password
  gives a '' prompt that I can't do anything with
  except to re-enter my password.
  I then get
  session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
  smbclient -L winpro -Uusername
  session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
  Some notes:
  My username and password is the same on both machines.
 
  The WXP computer has Service Pack 1 and 2.
 
  I can connect to shares on other machines from winpro.
 
  Larry
 
  Have you enabled NetBIOS over tcp/ip in the tcp/ip settings
  of your network interface? I think, it's placed in the
  WINS tab dialog page.
 
  Cheers, Günter
 
 
  Just looked again Günter.
  Yes, NetBIOS over tcp/ip is checked.
 
  Also iptables on the Linux machine is wide open (all policies ACCEPT).
  The entire internal LAN is behind a router/firewall of course.
 
  Larry
 
  
  Then i don't understand the result from one of your recent posts:
  nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
  gives an error message
  Failed to access NBT driver
  
  Btw - it should read nbtstat -n (sorry, my fault)
  
  Cheers, Günter
  
 
 Sorry Günter but I made a mistake with nbtstat -n.
 On winpro there was an old copy of nbtstat in a directory from Windows 
 98 but on my path.
 
 I renamed _that_ nbtstat and then
 which nbtstat
 found the real nbtstat in \windows\system32.
 
 --
 The result of nbtstat -n
 Local Area Connection 3:
 Node IpAddress: [10.22.44.11] Scope Id: []
 
  NetBIOS Local Name Table
 
 Name   Type Status
  -
  WINPRO 00  UNIQUE  Registered
  LANET  00  GROUP   Registered
  LANET  1E  GROUP   Registered
 
 Local Area Connection 4:
 Node IpAddress: [0.0.0.0] Scope Id: []
 
  No names in cache
 ---
 
 What does this result show for my problem?
 
 Larry

Have a look here how netbios names are registered and
what kind of resource type is used - the 00 or 1E
in your output.
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/691e1e3f-0ac1-45a2-b19a-cf7ef25ade4b1033.mspx?mfr=true

Your windows box has not registered the name WINPRO20,
so it seems to me, that the peer/server service is not
running ...
Btw, 'nmblookup -S winpro' (done on your samba box) should also
list the registered names.

Inside a windows cmdline console, does 'net share' list your
exports? 'net statistics server' should also list some info.

Cheers, Günter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] XP share not listed in Linneighborhood

2008-04-30 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
 Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 schrieb Larry Alkoff:
  I am unable to find my Windows XP share (winpro) in Linneighborhood 
  which runs on my desktop Kubuntu Linux box.
 
  When I try to mount that Windows XP share I get the error message:
  2139: session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  2139: session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called 
  name)
  SMB connection failed
  smbmt: Error: winpro _not_ mounted.
 
  The command line I'm using to mount Winpro is:
  smbmount //winpro/lba  /mnt/winpro  -o guest,uid=lba
 
  This line _used_ to work before I had a malfuntion on the winpro box 
  and 
  had to Repair XP.  Repair is similiar to a fresh install except many 
  (but not all) settings are kept.
 
  Both winpro and the Kubuntu box are on the same workgroup and subnet
  with fixed IP.
 
  Why is the winpro machine not listening on called name ?
 
  I've been working on this a couple of days and suspect something in 
  the 
  Windows XP configuration but haven't made any headway.
 
  Larry
 
 
  Are you sure, that you named that winxp box winpro?
  Inside a windows cmdline window, use nbtstat -n to view the
  registered netbios names. 
  Also have a look whether the workgroup matches.
 
  Btw - using 'smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password' is an easier
  way to check for availability of that remote box.
 
  Also 'smbtree' can help to diagnose that problem.
 
  Cheers, Günter
 
  Thanks very much for your reply Günter.
 
  Clicking on Control Panel System Properties shows
  'Full computer name' winpro
  and Workgroup LANET
  as expected.
 
  nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
  gives an error message
  Failed to access NBT driver
 
  smbtree gives a full screen of shares from other computers
  but nothing from winpro.  The shares list other windows 98 computers.
 
  smbclient -L winpro -Uusername%password
  gives a '' prompt that I can't do anything with
  except to re-enter my password.
  I then get
  session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
  smbclient -L winpro -Uusername
  session request to WINPRO failed (Not listening on called name)
  session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening on called name)
 
 
  Some notes:
  My username and password is the same on both machines.
 
  The WXP computer has Service Pack 1 and 2.
 
  I can connect to shares on other machines from winpro.
 
  Larry
 
  Have you enabled NetBIOS over tcp/ip in the tcp/ip settings
  of your network interface? I think, it's placed in the
  WINS tab dialog page.
 
  Cheers, Günter
 
  Just looked again Günter.
  Yes, NetBIOS over tcp/ip is checked.
 
  Also iptables on the Linux machine is wide open (all policies ACCEPT).
  The entire internal LAN is behind a router/firewall of course.
 
  Larry
 
  Then i don't understand the result from one of your recent posts:
  nbstat -n from winpro command prompt
  gives an error message
  Failed to access NBT driver
 
  Btw - it should read nbtstat -n (sorry, my fault)
 
  Cheers, Günter
 
  Sorry Günter but I made a mistake with nbtstat -n.
  On winpro there was an old copy of nbtstat in a directory from Windows 
  98 but on my path.
 
  I renamed _that_ nbtstat and then
  which nbtstat
  found the real nbtstat in \windows\system32.
 
  --
  The result of nbtstat -n
  Local Area Connection 3:
  Node IpAddress: [10.22.44.11] Scope Id: []
 
   NetBIOS Local Name Table
 
  Name   Type Status
   -
   WINPRO 00  UNIQUE  Registered
   LANET  00  GROUP   Registered
   LANET  1E  GROUP   Registered
 
  Local Area Connection 4:
  Node IpAddress: [0.0.0.0] Scope Id: []
 
   No names in cache
  ---
 
  What does this result show for my problem?
 
  Larry
  
  Have a look here how netbios names are registered and
  what kind of resource type is used - the 00 or 1E
  in your output.
  http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/691e1e3f-0ac1-45a2-b19a-cf7ef25ade4b1033.mspx?mfr=true
  
  Your windows box has not registered the name WINPRO20,
  so it seems to me, that the peer/server service is not
  running ...
  Btw, 'nmblookup -S winpro' (done on your samba box) should also
  list the registered names.
  
  Inside a windows cmdline console, does 'net share' list your
  exports? 'net statistics server' should also list some info.
  
  Cheers, Günter
  
 
 Hello Günter
 
 I'm not sure what to make

Re: [Samba] File locks?

2008-04-10 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Jim Young:

Hi Jim,

 Thanks for the info. I am using the smbfs debian package, but mount tells me
 that type is cifs
 
 //nsh/jyoung on /mnt/uni type cifs (rw,mand)
 
 I have updated my fstab:
 //nsh/jyoung/mnt/unicifs
 credentials=/myfolder/credentials,gid=jyoung,uid=jyoung,auto,rw
 0   0
 
 and remounted, same problem.
 
 Thanks, Jim
 
On your local system. what's the outcome of 'modinfo cifs' ?

Btw - recent debian/ubuntu packages ship versions of the smb/cifs userland
helpers smbmount and smbumount, which are no longer mounting smbfs when
specified. Instead they mount cifs vfs behind the scenes.
Both are (usually) also called indirectly by the mount/umount programs.
Technically spoken, 'mount -t smbfs ...' is (ususally) calling 
/sbin/mount.smbfs which formerly mounted smbfs - but now cifs vfs instead.
Cheers, Günter

 On 10/04/2008, Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:12:54AM -0600, Jim Young wrote:
   Hello,
  
 Recently, the following problem started happening with a particular
  samba
   server:
   If i have a file open for reading (say, a pdf in xpdf) and then try to
  write
   to it (say, through recompiling a latex document) it complains that it
   cannot open the file for writing.
  
   this seems like a file lock issue but I am unsure where it is happening.
  My
   previous usage should be perfectly safe since xpdf should only open for
   reading.
  
   This problem does not happen locally or when I connect to a different
  samba
   server (a windows machine). I can also ssh into the remote server, port
  xpdf
   , and my local process can write to the file. It is the samba connection
   that is making the lock.
  
 I am running Debian Unstable, using smbclient/smbfs 3.0.28a-1 to
  connect
   to a samba server (unix backend) on my university network. Server:
 
   Samba3.0.10-1.4E
 
  
   I mount the smb share in my fstab as follows:
  
   //myserver/jyoung/mnt/unismbfs
   credentials=credsfile,gid=jyoung,uid=jyoung,auto,rw
 
 
  smbfs is going out of support soon. You should be using cifsfs
  instead.
 
 
  Jeremy.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 James Young, B.Sc.
 Ph.D. Student
 Interactions laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of
 Calgary
 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
 Phone: +1.403.210.9502
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~jyoung/


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] RE: Mount error 13

2008-03-26 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 schrieb Tosh, Michael J:
  More information on my problem: (with text this time)
  
 linuxserver:/var/log # date;mount -v -t cifs //server/share /mnt/share
 -o credentials=.cifs_creds
 Wed Mar 26 12:03:38 EST 2008
 parsing options: rw,credentials=.cifs_creds
 
 Domain W2K3ADDOMAIN
 
 
 mount.cifs kernel mount options
 unc=//server\share,ip=10.x.x.x,user=remoteuser,domain=W2K3ADDOMAIN,pass=
 remotepass,ver=1,rw,credentials=/root/.cifs_creds
 mount error 13 = Permission denied
 Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
 
 linuxserver:/var/log # grep Mar 26 12:03 messages warn
 messages:Mar 26 12:03:08 proto2 kernel: CIFS: Unknown mount option
 credentials
 messages:Mar 26 12:03:08 proto2 kernel:  CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed
 w/return code = -13
 messages:Mar 26 12:03:39 proto2 kernel: CIFS: Unknown mount option
 credentials
 messages:Mar 26 12:03:39 proto2 kernel:  CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed
 w/return code = -13
 warn:Mar 26 12:03:08 proto2 kernel: CIFS: Unknown mount option
 credentials
 warn:Mar 26 12:03:08 proto2 kernel:  CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed
 w/return code = -13
 warn:Mar 26 12:03:39 proto2 kernel: CIFS: Unknown mount option
 credentials
 warn:Mar 26 12:03:39 proto2 kernel:  CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed
 w/return code = -13
 
 # smbclient -V
 Version 3.0.28-0.1.95-1624-SUSE-SLES9
 
  _ 
  From:   Tosh, Michael J  
  Sent:   Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:36 AM
  To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
  Subject:Mount error 13
  
  I am trying to connect a SLES9 server to a share on a Windows 2003
  domain.
  
  # mount -t cifs //server/share /mnt/share -o credentials=.cifs_creds
  mount error 13 = Permission denied
  Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
  
  #cat .cifs_creds
  username=remoteuser
  password=remotepass
  domain=W2K3ADDOMAIN
  
  
  On the domain controller, I see:
  Successful Network Logon:
  User Name:  remoteuser
  Domain: W2K3ADDOMAIN
  Logon ID:   (0x0,0x20544132)
  Logon Type: 3
  Logon Process:  NtLmSsp 
  Authentication Package: NTLM
  Workstation Name:   \\10.x.x.x (IP of linux box)
  Logon GUID: -
  Caller User Name:   -
  Caller Domain:  -
  Caller Logon ID:-
  Caller Process ID: -
  Transited Services: -
  Source Network Address: 10.x.x.x (IP of linux box)
  Source Port:0
  
  Then immediately after I see:
  User Logoff:
  User Name:  remoteuser
  Domain: W2K3ADDOMAIN
  Logon ID:   (0x0,0x20544132)
  Logon Type: 3

You need to install the cifs userland helpers mount.cifs and umount.cifs,
part of the samba client package (distro dependent).
The credentials file - and other stuff - is parsed in userland, before
being passed to the cifs kernel module.
Cheers, Günter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] [Samba to samba transfert] Timestamp problem

2008-02-28 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 schrieb Hervé Richard:
 Ross Smith wrote:
  I don't have a lot of experience of Samba, but under windows that's exactly 
  what I'd expect to see if you copied a bunch of files.  To retain 
  timestamps under windows you generally need to use a backup program and not 
  a copy one.
 
  However, since you're using Nautilus, are you actually using Samba to do 
  the copy?  I'm wondering if you would be better just avoiding Samba and 
  using Linux / Unix file transfer tools.  A quick google has brought up cp 
  --preserve=timestamps so I would imagine there are ways to do this.

 
 Using nautilus was easy and more flexible to make transfer but at the 
 end it took more time according to the timestamps problem :-/
 Yep I used scp -pr to copy and preserving timestamps.
 So in résumé scp is an alternative / workaround but not a solution to 
 the problem.
 What about a little patch in the future? ;-)
 
 Thanks for your answer.
 Hervé

It has already been mentioned, that a normal file copy does not preserve time 
stamps!
Inside a console, (assuming file test is present), try
  stat test  cp test /tmp  stat /tmp/test
As can be seen, no time stamps are preserved!

But
  stat test  cp -p test /tmp  stat /tmp/test
does preserve them.

Note, that the '-p' option is not available on all *nixes.

So nautilus would need a configuration option (or similar) to
allow what you want.
It's not a samba problem at all.
Cheers, Günter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients

2008-02-18 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Guenter Kukkukk:
 Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Michael Lueck:

  
  /bin/mount -t cifs -o 
  credentials=/home/mdlueck/.smbcredentials,uid=mdlueck,gid=mdlueck 
  //ldslnx01/data /mnt/ldslnx01/data/
  
  And received this type of error:
  
  mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //ldslnx01/data,
  missing codepage or other error
  In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
  dmesg | tail  or so

 
 What kind of smb server is running //ldslnx01/data  ?
 
 Cheers, Guenter

This kind of error is reported, when the userland cifs helpers
mount.cifs (and umount.cifs) are not installed - or the symlinks
are not set.

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients

2008-02-18 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Michael Lueck:
 simo wrote:
 
  There is no interdependency at all, when compiling samba you can choose
  to build either or both helpers, it is a packaging choice. Most
  distributions are slowly killing smbfs and stopping building the
  smbmount helper in the samba packages.
 
 I unmounted all cifs connections, then I purged the smbfs package off of my 
 Ubuntu 7.04 desktop.
 
 I tried mounting connections:
 
 /bin/mount -t cifs -o 
 credentials=/home/mdlueck/.smbcredentials,uid=mdlueck,gid=mdlueck 
 //ldslnx01/data /mnt/ldslnx01/data/
 
 And received this type of error:
 
 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //ldslnx01/data,
 missing codepage or other error
 In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
 dmesg | tail  or so
 
 Thus, the dependency I was referring to. I do not like to be one to argue. 
 (shrug)
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 Michael Lueck
 Lueck Data Systems
 http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
 

What kind of smb server is running //ldslnx01/data  ?

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba + LDAP

2007-10-12 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Freitag, 12. Oktober 2007 06:58 schrieb John H Terpstra:
 On Thursday 11 October 2007 22:57, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
  Are the IDEALX tools necessary for complete integration with LDAP?  Or
  is the built-in support sufficiently advanced now?
 
  Daniel
 
 Daniel,
 
 What function do you believe the IDEALX tools serve?  Why do you think these 
 scripts are needed?  What makes you think that built-in support might be 
 the right (or best) solution?
 
 Have you read the Samba documentation? Specifically, is there anything in the 
 Samba3-HOWTO or in Samba3-ByExample that would lead you to believe that there 
 is any attempt to supercede the necessity for the IDEALX tools (or an 
 alternative set of scripts that is external to Samba itself)?
 
 What does complete integration with LDAP mean to you?
 
 You are not the first person to ask questions like these.  It would help me 
 to 
 write more useful documentation if I could better understand what is behind 
 the questions.
 
 In case you do not know of the books Samba3-HOWTO and Samba3-byExample 
 they can be obtained from:
 
   http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf
   http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample.pdf
 
 The IDEALX tools are a means of creating and managing UNIX user and group 
 accounts in the LDAP directory.  Samba can then create and manage the Windows 
 (SambaSAM) account information that is necessary to support Windows network 
 activities.
 
 As a network administrator, I want total control over how UNIX accounts are 
 managed in my LDAP directory and I would not want this done by Samba - 
 particularly if that removes my ability to control how this is done.  Your 
 mileage may vary, but I suspect most UNIX administrators who manage Samba 
 would not want to lose control of the UNIX part of the directory.
 
 For example, if Samba had total control over all Windows networking (Samba) 
 accounts, and the Windows network administrator deletes a user account, but 
 the users also has vital UNIX files, how should the deletion of the UNIX 
 account information be handled?
 
 By keeping the LDAP administration scripts that impact the UNIX account 
 management separate from the Windows (Samba) account part, the administrator 
 can exercise greater control over.  - Just my $0.02 worth.
 
 Cheers,
 John T.

Hi John,

there is ongoing work to avoid (some) external scripts

http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.26a-1 / Debian/Lenny sendfile(?) performance problems

2007-09-30 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Samstag, 29. September 2007 20:00 schrieb Justin Piszcz:
 Package: samba
 Version: 3.0.26a-1
 
 Kernel: 2.6.22
 
 samba 3.0.26a-1 performance  900 KiB/s, but FTP = 30-90 MiB/s
 
 Let me start out by saing this is an oddball problem:
 
 SAMBA:
 LINUX - WINDOWS =  900 KiB/s (varies between 100 - 900 KiB/s)
 WINDOWS - LINUX = 30-90 MiB/s (always)
 
 FTP:
 Either direction, 30-90 MiB/s (always)
 
 I do not see any nasty errors in the logs even with verbose = 5.
 
 Any ideas here? I am not using any special options.
 
 # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
 
 [global]
  log level = 5
  workgroup = WORKGROUP
  server string = %h - Pentium IV 3.4GHZ
  security = user
  encrypt passwords = true
 
 [user]
comment = user
path= /home/user
writable= yes
valid users = user
create mask = 644
 
 --
 
 Here, FTP for pulling files from Linux.
 
 ftp mget *
 200 TYPE is now 8-bit binary
 200 PORT command successful
 150-Connecting to port 1255
 150 715924.0 kbytes to download
 226-File successfully transferred
 226 13.687 seconds (measured here), 51.08 Mbytes per second
 ftp: 733106176 bytes received in 13.69Seconds 53562.23Kbytes/sec.
 200 PORT command successful
 150-Connecting to port 1256
 150 716272.0 kbytes to download
 226-File successfully transferred
 226 13.032 seconds (measured here), 53.67 Mbytes per second
 ftp: 733462528 bytes received in 13.05Seconds 56216.95Kbytes/sec.
 200 PORT command successful
 150-Connecting to port 1257
 150 713200.0 kbytes to download
 226-File successfully transferred
 226 12.869 seconds (measured here), 54.12 Mbytes per second
 ftp: 730316800 bytes received in 12.88Seconds 56723.63Kbytes/sec.
 
 Here, FTP for pushing files to Linux.
 
 ftp mput 1 2 3
 200 PORT command successful
 150 Connecting to port 1263
 226-File successfully transferred
 226 12.802 seconds (measured here), 54.61 Mbytes per second
 ftp: 733106176 bytes sent in 12.80Seconds 57287.35Kbytes/sec.
 200 PORT command successful
 150 Connecting to port 1264
 226-File successfully transferred
 226 12.949 seconds (measured here), 54.02 Mbytes per second
 ftp: 733462528 bytes sent in 12.95Seconds 56624.92Kbytes/sec.
 200 PORT command successful
 150 Connecting to port 1265
 226-File successfully transferred
 226 15.400 seconds (measured here), 45.23 Mbytes per second
 ftp: 730316800 bytes sent in 15.38Seconds 47500.28Kbytes/sec.
 
 But (all I can offer is packet dumps/traces or bandwidth measurements):
 
 Incoming:   Outgoing:
 Curr: 0.00 MByte/s  Curr: 0.07 MByte/s
 Avg: 0.00 MByte/s   Avg: 0.07 MByte/s
 Min: 0.00 MByte/s   Min: 0.07 MByte/s
 Max: 0.00 MByte/s   Max: 0.07 MByte/s
 Ttl: 1898.08 MByte  Ttl: 2954.92 MByte
 
 LOCAL - REMOTE  TXBPS   RXBPS 
 TOTALBPS
   (IP)  PORT  PROTO  (IP)  PORT   TX  RX
 TOTAL
 linuxbox - p4w.internal.lan  546k/s 4.74k/s 551k/s
 192.168.0.1 445TCP  192.168.0.212596.88m106k  6.99m
 
 Why do I get such poor performance when trying to retrieve a file off the 
 Linux box?  This is a very strange problem.
 
 Linux:
 
 $ netstat -i
 Kernel Interface table
 Iface   MTU Met   RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVRTX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR 
 Flg
 eth0   1500 0  14049682  0  0  0 11354070  0  0  0 
 BMRU
 lo16436 0 45335  0  0  045335  0  0  0 LRU
 
 Windows:
 
 netstat -s
 
 IPv4 Statistics
 
Packets Received   = 5053597
Received Header Errors = 0
Received Address Errors= 19
Datagrams Forwarded= 0
Unknown Protocols Received = 0
Received Packets Discarded = 2
Received Packets Delivered = 5053595
Output Requests= 3655144
Routing Discards   = 0
Discarded Output Packets   = 0
Output Packet No Route = 0
Reassembly Required= 0
Reassembly Successful  = 0
Reassembly Failures= 0
Datagrams Successfully Fragmented  = 0
Datagrams Failing Fragmentation= 3
Fragments Created  = 0
 
 ICMPv4 Statistics
 
  ReceivedSent
Messages  47  24
Errors0   0
Destination Unreachable   25  2
Time Exceeded 0   0
Parameter Problems0   0
Source Quenches   0   0
Redirects 0   0
Echos 0   22
Echo Replies  22  0
Timestamps0   0
Timestamp Replies 0   0
Address Masks 0   0
Address 

Re: [Samba] OS/2 Warp 4 Access Issues

2007-07-05 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 22:38 schrieb Michael Powell:
 OK, here are the versions:
 
 OS/2 Warp 4.50
 Debian Etch
 Samba 3.0.24-6etch4
 linux kernel 2.6.18
 
 I actually started having problems before upgrading to etch.  Then, I was on 
 a 
 2.4 kernel, and had upgraded to what was then the latest security fix for
 samba for the debian stable version previous to etch.  I was hoping that
 upgrading to etch might fix the problem, but it did not.  FWIW, I did a 
 clean upgrade to etch, using the netinstall CD, so all of the previous
 binaries and config files were over-written (nothing left behind to cause
 problems).
 
 As for the problem... on the OS/2 box, the shares on the debian box are 
 displayed (just as the shares on the Win9x box are), but when I click on
 any of the debian shares, OS/2 reports that No objects were found that
 match the specified find criteria.  So, none of the files that reside
 in the shared folders are displayed.  It is as if the shares have no files
 in them (but they do!).
 
 OS/2 does appear to access the PDF Printer share OK, and acts as
 though it is printing to it, but I have no idea where the PDF files that
 it is printing are being saved.  ;-)  It cannot access any of the
 disk shares.
 
 Here is the smb.conf config file (with certain bits replaced with 'X'):
 
 [global]
 netbios name = XX
 server string = debian
 workgroup = XX
 hosts allow = 127. 192.168.X.
 #printcap name = /etc/printcap
 printcap name = cups
 load printers = yes
 printing = cups
 cups options = raw
 guest account = smbguest
 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log
 max log size = 1000
 security = user
 username level = 8
 password level = 8
 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g sambamachines -c 'Samba 
 Machine Account' -s /dev/null -M '%u'
 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
 encrypt passwords = yes
 unix password sync = no
 passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd '%u'
 passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n 
 *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*\n
 null passwords = no
 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
 interfaces = 127.0.0.1/8 192.168.X.X
 remote browse sync = 192.168.X.255
 remote announce = 192.168.X.255
 local master = no
 os level = 33
 domain master = no
 preferred master = no
 time server = no
 domain logons = no
 logon drive = m:
 logon home = \\%L\homes\%u
 logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u
 logon script = %G.bat
 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast
 wins support = no
 msdfs root = yes
 
 wins proxy = no
 dns proxy = no
 preserve case = no
 winbind use default domain = yes
 idmap uid = 16777216-33554431
 idmap gid = 16777216-33554431
 template shell = /dev/null
 
 [homes]
 comment = Home Directories
 path = /home
 read only = no
 available = yes
 browseable = yes
 writable = yes
 guest ok = no
 public = no
 printable = no
 share modes = no
 locking = no
 
 [netlogon]
 comment = Network Logon Service
 path = /home/netlogon
 read only = no
 available = yes
 browseable = yes
 writable = no
 guest ok = no
 public = no
 printable = no
 share modes = no
 locking = no
 
 Thanks for your assistance!
 

Hi Michael,

add the following to the [global] section of smb.conf:

ea support = yes

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Support for multiple file streams?

2007-07-01 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007 22:07 schrieb Ephi Dror:
 Hello,
 
  
 
 Look like demand for multiple file streams support increased lately.
 
  
 
 Does samba 3 series intend to support it any time soon?
 
  
 
 Look like SAMBA 4 is working on it based on the following form Andrew
 Tridgell:
 
 One simple but important example of how the new NTVFS layer helps is the
 addition of support for NT file streams. A file in a NT filesystem can
 have multiple streams, where the primary stream (called :$DATA) is
 the normal file data that people are used to thinking about, but there
 can be any number of other named streams containing other types of data,
 such as meta-data describing who wrote the file, or an audio stream, or
 even some data from an anti-virus scan of the file. Importantly, recent
 updates to WindowsXP use streams to store security information about
 where a file came from, which allows Windows to display a warning when
 you try to execute a file that comes from an untrusted security zone.
 POSIX file systems have no concept of multiple streams, and as Samba was
 originally designed as a tool for representing a POSIX filesystem to
 Windows clients, there was no attempt to add stream support. The
 situation has now changed, with streams becoming a more essential
 feature for a file server for Windows clients, and at the same time user
 expectations for compatibility with WindowsNT have risen. This means we
 really need to support streams, but in order to do that properly, a lot
 of the internals of Samba needed to be updated. This is achieved in
 Samba4 using the new NTVFS layer, which allows streams to be represented
 either using an external database or using file xattrs, which is an
 extension recently added to Linux, and which is also present in a number
 of other, Unix-like systems. 
 
 Does anyone aware on any experimental attempt to provide this
 functionality in samba 3.0.x or if it is on the roadmap.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ephi
 
  
 

Ephi,

there is currently _no_ way to (exactly) represent MS ntfs alternate
data streams on *nix file systems!

The approach to store them on the *nix side into the xattr file space
- or into a separate DB - (like samba4 is doing) is a first go, but
can never meet the the nearly unlimited size of ads on MS systems.

Ext2/ext3 has a limited xattr size of about 4KB (!), other file systems
(reiserfs, xfs, jfs, ...) allow about (restricted multiples) of 64KB.

Anyway - _big_ alternate data streams on current *nix systems is
a no go!

The good news. MS alternate data streams haven't been used
heavily in the past - and the currently used sizes could be 
represented by using the very simple *nix xattr space.

Samba4 is going that way, and samba3 atm has no chance to do
it a different way...

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Use metadata files in Samba

2007-06-05 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Sonntag, 27. Mai 2007 09:24 schrieb Thomas Bley:
 Hello,
 
 Often people (or applications) want to store additional information
 about a file. E.g. history, approval state, search tags, etc. Some
 file formats offer to integrate these metadata, some not (e.g. exif-
 headers, id3, etc.).
 My idea would be to create an additional filename.xyz.meta file next
 to a filename.xyz in the same folder. If the filename.xyz gets
 renamed/deleted/moved, the filename.xyz.meta file should be also
 renamed/deleted/moved in case it exists.
 
 Is this possible with Samba or are there better ways to do handle
 metadata ?
 
 Regards
 Thomas
 
 

Hi Thomas,

Samba is accessed from a lot of different clients.
Many of them support meta file information
  - OS/2 extended attributes
  - windows alternate data streams and EAs
  - *nix xattr
  - 

Samba3 does support most of those meta file/dir information,
but not 'alternate data streams'.

Under linux have a look at 'man setxattr' how to cope with that.
(see also cmds like setfattr, getfattr, ...)

Samba3 itself uses VFS_* wrappers to convert the smb xattr calls
into corresponding calls of the underlying operating system.

File systems support different max. summed up sizes for all xattr, e.g.
  - ext2 / ext3 ~3.9KB
  - reiserfs/XFSN * 64KB
  - JFS 128KB

Have a look at the end of
http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/samba4/howto.txt
It's from samba4, but explains some basic requirements for xattr support.

http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/
is a bit outdated, but does also mention 'extended attributes'.
As the article claims, some care must be taken during backup / restore,
when EAs or ACLs have been used.

Your 2 file approach is not supported bei samba - and imho is always a bad idea.

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with Windows 2003 connecting a Samba server

2007-05-29 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2007 22:12 schrieb Chan Jason:
 Hi list,
I am encountering a problem in connecting a Windows 2003 to a Samba
 3.0.21b server. The Samba server is configured to have a security =
 share option, so that no password is needed. I can connect to the
 server by typing net use z: \\192.168.51.1\data, and it is
 successful. However, if I try to do dir z:, no file found! Same
 behaviour are found in Windows operation, i.e. type
 \\192.168.51.1\data under Run box in Start Menu. Strangely, another
 server with 3.0.14a does not have such problem, and another Windows XP
 does not have such problem too! They can view the files in share
 easily.
 
 Here comes the log file:
 [2007/05/30 04:13:15, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(885)
   192.168.2.37 (192.168.2.37) closed connection to service data
 [2007/05/30 04:15:35, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(693)
   192.168.2.37 (192.168.2.37) connect to service data initially as
 user nobody (uid=99, gid=99) (pid 30283)
 [2007/05/30 04:17:00, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(885)
   192.168.2.37 (192.168.2.37) closed connection to service data
 [2007/05/30 04:17:00, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(693)
   192.168.2.37 (192.168.2.37) connect to service data initially as
 user nobody (uid=99, gid=99) (pid 30301)
 [2007/05/30 04:18:08, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(885)
   192.168.2.37 (192.168.2.37) closed connection to service data
 
 Here comes the testparm:
 [global]
 unix charset = big5
 workgroup = CC
 netbios name = CCSERVER
 server string = Samba Server
 security = SHARE
 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
 max log size = 50
 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
 printcap name = /etc/printcap
 dns proxy = No
 cups options = raw
 
 [homes]
 comment = Home Directories
 read only = No
 browseable = No
 
 [printers]
 comment = All Printers
 path = /var/spool/samba
 printable = Yes
 browseable = No
 
 [data]
 comment = Public Data
 path = /data
 read only = No
 create mask = 0777
 guest ok = Yes
 
 Also here is the traffic log:
   0.00 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1902  microsoft-ds [SYN]
 Seq=2266364078 Ack=0 Win=65535 Len=0
   0.000356 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1903  netbios-ssn [SYN]
 Seq=1017632209 Ack=0 Win=65535 Len=0
   0.010996 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP microsoft-ds  1902 [SYN,
 ACK] Seq=1194648936 Ack=2266364079 Win=5808 Len=0
   0.011333 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1902  microsoft-ds [ACK]
 Seq=2266364079 Ack=1194648937 Win=65535 Len=0
   0.011445 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Negotiate Protocol Request
   0.011599 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP netbios-ssn  1903 [SYN,
 ACK] Seq=1190050630 Ack=1017632210 Win=5808 Len=0
   0.011758 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1903  netbios-ssn [RST]
 Seq=1017632210 Ack=1017632210 Win=0 Len=0
   0.022912 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP microsoft-ds  1902 [ACK]
 Seq=1194648937 Ack=2266364216 Win=6432 Len=0
   0.024424 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 SMB Negotiate Protocol Response
   0.025427 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Session Setup AndX
 Request, User: EXPRESS-11AIQI4\Administrator; Tree Connect AndX, Path:
 \\192.168.51.1\DATA
   0.039981 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 SMB Session Setup AndX
 Response; Tree Connect AndX
   0.040262 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Transaction2 Request
 QUERY_PATH_INFORMATION, Path:
   0.051879 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 SMB Transaction2 Response
 QUERY_PATH_INFORMATION
   0.052291 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Transaction2 Request
 FIND_FIRST2, Pattern: \*
   1.519710 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Transaction2 Request
 FIND_FIRST2, Pattern: \*
   1.530914 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP microsoft-ds  1902 [ACK]
 Seq=1194652038 Ack=2266364728 Win=7504 Len=0
  51.023255 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Echo Request
  51.033769 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP microsoft-ds  1902 [ACK]
 Seq=1194652038 Ack=2266364781 Win=7504 Len=0
  85.150658 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1902  microsoft-ds [FIN,
 ACK] Seq=2266364781 Ack=1194649246 Win=65226 Len=0
  85.169401 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 NBSS NBSS Continuation Message
  85.169910 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1902  microsoft-ds [ACK]
 Seq=2266364782 Ack=1194649246 Win=65226 Len=0
  85.170486 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1904  microsoft-ds [SYN]
 Seq=3224569487 Ack=0 Win=65535 Len=0
  85.170724 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1905  netbios-ssn [SYN]
 Seq=494418265 Ack=0 Win=65535 Len=0
  85.179785 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP microsoft-ds  1904 [SYN,
 ACK] Seq=1275220318 Ack=3224569488 Win=5808 Len=0
  85.180158 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 TCP 1904  microsoft-ds [ACK]
 Seq=3224569488 Ack=1275220319 Win=65535 Len=0
  85.180250 192.168.2.37 - 192.168.51.1 SMB Negotiate Protocol Request
  85.183753 192.168.51.1 - 192.168.2.37 TCP netbios-ssn  1905 [SYN,
 ACK] Seq=1269633862 Ack=494418266 

Re: [Samba] Use metadata files in Samba

2007-05-28 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Sonntag, 27. Mai 2007 09:24 schrieb Thomas Bley:
 Hello,
 
 Often people (or applications) want to store additional information
 about a file. E.g. history, approval state, search tags, etc. Some
 file formats offer to integrate these metadata, some not (e.g. exif-
 headers, id3, etc.).
 My idea would be to create an additional filename.xyz.meta file next
 to a filename.xyz in the same folder. If the filename.xyz gets
 renamed/deleted/moved, the filename.xyz.meta file should be also
 renamed/deleted/moved in case it exists.
 
 Is this possible with Samba or are there better ways to do handle
 metadata ?
 
 Regards
 Thomas
 
 

Hi Thomas,

Samba is accessed from a lot of different clients.
Many of them support meta file information
  - OS/2 extended attributes
  - windows alternate data streams and EAs
  - *nix xattr
  - 

Samba3 does support most of those meta file/dir information,
but not 'alternate data streams'.

Under linux have a look at 'man setxattr' how to cope with that.
(see also cmds like setfattr, getfattr, ...)

Samba3 itself uses VFS_* wrappers to convert the smb xattr calls
into corresponding calls of the underlying operating system.

File systems support different max. summed up sizes for all xattr, e.g.
  - ext2 / ext3     ~3.9KB
  - reiserfs/XFS    N * 64KB
  - JFS             128KB

Have a look at the end of
http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/samba4/howto.txt
It's from samba4, but explains some basic requirements for xattr support.

http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/
is a bit outdated, but does also mention 'extended attributes'.
As the article claims, some care must be taken during backup / restore,
when EAs or ACLs have been used.

Your 2 file approach is not supported bei samba - and imho is always a bad idea.

Cheers, Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] smbmount

2007-05-25 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 21:42 schrieb Chris Smith:
 On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
  The files are on a W98 system for historical reasons and they are
  being slowly migrated off. However, the reason I can't just move them
  is because I'm using Windows programs on the legacy systems. Some I
  wrote myself, in Visual Basic, so I can't blame anybody else for the
  situation. Another program I use is Photoshop, which they won't port
  to Linux (despite the fact it is the program most wanted to be ported
  to Linux). Etc. I need to keep running Windows as long as I have the
  need for such stuff.
 
 The data files don't need to reside on that system. Virtually every app I 
 know 
 of, including Photoshop, can access, open, edit, and save files on remote 
 shares. Some real legacy apps may require mapped drives instead of UNC paths 
 but they should, in most cases, work just fine.
 
 Chris
 

Hi all,

just some additions and clarifications from my side.

Samba3 / Samba4
===
For some years now I'm trying hard to support the samba3 / samba4 team
regarding missing features or bugs related to legacy clients - mainly OS/2,
but also windows9x/me.
Nice and interesting times and the experience, that the samba developers
_always_ have had and _still_ have an open ear, when troubles or wishes 
are reported to them!

The main problem is, that those missing stuff must be _reported_ to them!

These days, most of the samba developers do not have any physical
access to legacy client installations anymore. 
So it's getting more and more important to send them as much background
information as possible, like detailed
  - debug 10 logs
  - network sniffs
  - used samba version and smb.conf settings
  - used operating systems (fixpak level)
  - used file systems (e.g. xattr support)
  - proposed patches
  - ...

In addition, it's very important to help with testing suggested patches
before they go mainstream.
Cause some of those legacy questions can also easily be discussed on irc, 
some years ago I've opened 2 separate channels on irc.freenode.net:
  #samba-os2
  #samba-os2-technical
The names are a bit misleading - but all legacy smb users are welcome there. :-)

To my knowledge, most of the outstanding (OS/2) glitches are solved now.


CIFS kernel module:
===
When the first discussions about dropping the kernel module smbfs and
its samba userland helpers
  - smbmount
  - smbmnt
  - smbumount
were starting on @samba-technical about a year ago, Jeremy Allison (jra)
told me on irc, that Steve French (sfrench) had already added some 
code to support legacy smb servers within cifs.

That days I started to build my own cifs.ko from the samba hosted cifs-client 
svn repository, to be able to add and test code for possibly missing
features regarding legacy smb servers.

Cause I was not aware of the separately existing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED], private email exchange with
Steve was starting to discuss and solve missing stuff - sending
patches back and forth... for many weeks ...
Steve also managed to get access to an OS/2 box, to test stuff himself.
Afaik, he's testing against win9x, too.

I must admit, that we had one big problem that days: Steve was
doing his work on the kernel git-tree - and I was using the samba
cifs-client svn repository...
Both repos got more or less so worse out of sync, that the
simple exchange of patches was no longer feasible.

I'm working as a freelancer and got distracted from cifs due to
other customer needs - which is a bit reflected in 
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4090
Sorry for my probably upset comments...

To solve the 2 repository problem, at the end of last year
i did setup a completely separate linux box entirely for cifs stuff.
Installed git, cogito and sparse - and joined LKML.
I'm able to test here against 3 OS/2 and 1 win98 legacy box.


One major issue was (and partly is) the reading and writing of
file/directory time stamps - with ugly side-effects on the OS/2
side: due to the parameter lastwritetime = 0 used on SMBClose, 
all time stamps on the OS/2 side were reset to NULL during file-
browsing. 
BTW - when browsing directories with konqueror, it usually 
tries to display some popup-contents of the file the mouse is over.
   - open file
   - read (part) of the file
   - close the file == SMBClose()!! = filetime = zero

Another problem is the fact, that *nix and newer windows are
using UTC as the base for time stamps, but some legacy servers
always use localtime and send them on the wire.
 
Today, afaik all of reading time stamps is fixed.
But there are still issues when writing a file/dir.

cp -p linux_src_file os2_dst_file

does not preserve any time stamp (the legacy versions of
setfileinfo() / setpathinfo() are not implemented atm).
I mailed Steve, that this is even true, when copying to
a win2k or winxp server.
Setpathinfo() does not work, when the file is still open.
_Only_ on winNT, a separate open, setfileinfo, close 

Re: [Samba] Building Samba 4 - Includes.c missing?

2007-02-27 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2007 03:24 schrieb Frank Gruman:
 Hello all,
 
 I've been peacefully using Samba 3 for about 3 years now, and it has done a 
 wonderful job in my little world as domain member servers for file and print 
 serving.  Much bettetrver farms that some of my peers in the company are 
 using.
 
 So I want to try Samba 4 and see if I can play with making it my PDC.  The 
 only problem is that when I go to make, I receive the following error:
 
 ...
 Creating torture/ndr/proto.h
 Generating dependencies for torture/ndr/ndr.c
 Generating dependencies for torture/local/local.c
 Removing precompiled headers
 Precompiling include/includes.h
 gcc: include/includes.c: No such file or directory
 gcc: no input files
 make: *** [include/includes.h.gch] Error 1
 
 
 This, after a successful autoconf, configure, and make pch all.  In looking 
 in the include folder, there is only includes.h.
 
 I pulled the files straight from subversion, so would have hoped that I got 
 everything necessary.  Has anyone else had this issue building Samba 4?
 
 Regards,
 Frank
 

Hi Frank,

instead of using 'make pch all'

just use 'make'

the option 'pch' (pre-compiled headers) often does not work. :-(

Cheers, Guenter
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Windows XP share charset problem

2006-11-28 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Dienstag, 28. November 2006 19:29 schrieb Arlequín:
 Hello, there


 I want to connect to a Windows XP share using the following line in my
 fstab

 \\WINDOWS-PC\SHARE /dir/to/mount/share smbfs
 auto,umask=0002,credentials=/etc/winpassword,iocharset=utf8,gid=0,noauto 0
 0

 It mounts OK but I can't get the charset shown correctly for non-ASCII
 chars like á ç ñ et cetera.

 I've even tried using cpage=850 option when mounting without success.
 I've looked for this issue on Samba documentation but wasn't able to
 find an example on how to solve it.

 Does anyone have any idea about how to deal with this kinda shares?

 T.I.A.
 --
 Arlequín _o)
 amahoro_AT_adinet_DOT_com_DOT_uy / \\
 http://counter.li.org/ _(___V
 Linux Registered User  #207262

This issue has often been discussed - but you won't get a fix for it.
smbfs is no longer maintained - use cifs instead, which is the
successor of smbfs. (man mount.cifs)
Please note, that the mount.cifs helper stuff is part of the
samba suite, cifs itself is a kernel module!

Cheers, Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Crippled file list on samba 3.0.23-c2. Debian Etch x64 (files randomly not showing up)

2006-11-11 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Samstag, 11. November 2006 16:24 schrieb Henrik Cednert:
 Sorry to bugger you people. But no one have any suggestions about this?

 /Henrik

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi there people.
 
  My first post here at the list so I hope I havn't made any misstakes so
  far and that I can write in such a way so you people understand me. =)
 
  The problem I have is that when I list folders on disks mouted with
  mount -t smbfs ... the file lists of folders are crippled. What I mean
  is that files are randomly missing in the lists even if they are there. A
  refresh of the dir can help sometimes but most of the time the missing
  files/files appear and some other files disappear. A huge problem here
  since i work with Shake and pretty large file sequences.
 
  I was adviced at the IRC-channel to downgrade to an earlier version but
  before I do that I wanted to try my luck here. I'm also in the middle of
  a project here at work so I don't want to mess to much with the computer
  just yet.
 
  Thanks in advance for any help that solves this.
 
  Sincerely,
 
  Henrik C, Sweden

Hi Henrik,

the _kernel_ module 'smbfs' is not related to samba - so you are asking
in the wrong list!
Anyway - smbfs is _no_ longer maintained (for a long while now).
So you better use 'cifs' now, which is the successor of smbfs.
The mount options are a bit different - have a look at 'man mount.cifs'.

Please note, that the cifs userland helper 'mount.cifs' _is_ part of
the samba distribution.

Good luck.
Guenter Kukkukk
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problem mounting with credentials file

2006-10-27 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Freitag, 27. Oktober 2006 19:29 schrieb Jonathan Duncan:
 On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Ethy H. Brito wrote:
  On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:55:08 -0600 (MDT)
 
  Jonathan Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am mounting as the root user because I have not given my user
  permission to mount this share.
 
  Following is the results of the troubleshooting steps that you gave me.
  I did not understand what would be wrong from looking at the strace.
 
  Please run locate mount.cifs or, if you dont have it installed,
  find / -name mount.cifs 2/dev/null
 
  It seems that you do not have mount.cifs installed or it is out of your
  search PATH. mount is looking for it at /sbin. Provide a link, please.
 
  Ethy
 
  lstat64(/etc/mtab, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=286, ...}) = 0
  stat64(/sbin/mount.cifs, 0xbffa1e70)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
  directory)
  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ~[TRAP SEGV RTMIN RT_1], NULL, 8) = 0
  mount(//192.168.0.2/share, /mnt/share, cifs,
  MS_POSIXACL|MS_ACTIVE|MS_NOUSER|0xec, 0x80638f0) = -1 EINVAL
  (Invalid argument)
  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, ~[TRAP SEGV RTMIN RT_1], NULL, 8) = 0
  write(2, mount: wrong fs type, bad option..., 111mount: wrong fs type,
  bad option, bad superblock on //192.168.0.2/share,
  missing codepage or other error
  ) = 111

 locate and find both turned up nothing.

 Apparently I do not have mount.cifs on my filesystem.  That does not make
 sense to me.  CIFS works when I specify a username and password directly
 but not when I use the credentials option.  It would seem that CIFS is
 installed.

 Regards,
 Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,

you _need_ mount.cifs when using a credentials file!
mount.cifs reads and parses the credentials file - the cifs kernel module does 
_not_!

Good luck - Guenter Kukkukk
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problem mounting with credentials file

2006-10-27 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Am Samstag, 28. Oktober 2006 02:14 schrieb Jonathan Duncan:
 On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
  locate and find both turned up nothing.
 
  Apparently I do not have mount.cifs on my filesystem.  That does not
  make sense to me.  CIFS works when I specify a username and password
  directly but not when I use the credentials option.  It would seem that
  CIFS is installed.
 
  Regards,
  Jonathan
 
  Hi Jonathan,
 
  you _need_ mount.cifs when using a credentials file!
  mount.cifs reads and parses the credentials file - the cifs kernel module
  does _not_!

 Thank you.  This is probably dependant on my distribution, but how do I
 get that file?  Is it usually installed with samba?  Do I just create it?

 Thanks,
 Jonathan

The mount.cifs helper stuff is part of samba.
The binary is usually installed as /sbin/mount.cifs

Guenter

Hmm - should also send this to the list - done...
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Transfer rates faster than 23MBps?

2006-09-23 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
On Saturday 23 September 2006 17:13, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
 Mark Smith wrote:
  I also tried your values, with the tcp_window_scaling, with no luck.

 It's enable by default, but I explicitly set options other options
 depend on.

 I set up my test rig again.
 Host server
 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3, samba 3.0.23
 Broadcom Nextreme BCM5702X Gigabit, tg3 driver default config
 Client
 2.6.12-1.1381_FC3, samba 3.0.21pre3-SVN-build-11739
 Intel Pro/1000, 82546GB Gigabit, e1000 driver default config
 HD Drives on both are 45-50MBps
...snip

Hi Doug,

have you ever tried netio to check for raw needwork speed?
http://www.ars.de/ars/ars.nsf/docs/netio
It does not add any overhead caused by file operations - so it
can help to tune raw parameters.
The source is included - so it can be tuned, too.
When sniffing such traffic, also have a look, how tcpi/ip ACK
packets are used and whether they are send immediately
or with some delay.

Good luck - Guenter Kukkukk
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] More on the archive bit saga

2006-09-12 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
 Using attrib -s on the file removed the access denied part. Strange
 that some files mysteriously got ACLs when others did not.

 Yes, map system = no is set.

 server:/share/personal/smith# getfattr -d foo.txt
 # file: foo.txt
 user.DOSATTRIB=0x0

 Is that good or bad?

Hi Aaron,

assuming the following conditions are met:
- the samba share is located on a file system
  which supports xattr
- smb.conf has the following entries
 ea support = yes
 store dos attributes = yes
 map archive = no
 map hidden = no
 map system = no

Expressing the DOS attribute bits in hexadecimal notation, you get
the following - the user.DOSATTRIB like display is shown in braces:
readonly  0x01  (0x1)
hidden0x02  (0x2)
system0x04  (0x4)
archive   0x20  (0x20)

Any mixture of no attribute to all attributes set is possible.
The bits are ORed together.
So, when all attributes are set: | is the OR operator
0x01 | 0x02 | 0x04 | 0x20 results to 0x27

getfattr -d foo.txt
# file: foo.txt
user.DOSATTRIB=0x27

matches the win console output:
attrib foo.txt
A  SHR Z:\foo.txt

When removing all attributes with
attrib -r -h -s -a foo.txt

windows shows:
attrib foo.txt
   Z:\foo.txt

and linux:
getfattr -d foo.txt
# file: foo.txt
user.DOSATTRIB=0x0

As already noted, any mixture of bits is possible.
Hope this helps.
Guenter


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Enabling CIFS

2006-09-07 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
 I upgraded my SUSE 10.0 server to the Suse Projects 3.0.23c rpms. When I try 
 to use cifs to mount, I get the error:

 mount error 112: Host is down

 by using this syntax:

 # mount -t cifs -o ro //p-t18/G /mnt/test

 What do I need to do to make this work?
 ...

Hi Felix,

if you try to mount a server which is using an
old SMB dialect (like OS/2), you get this error.

Some weeks ago we already discussed that.
The current cifs is atm not enabled to support the
older dialects.
That was the reason we built our own kernel with
cifs enabled to also negotiate an older dialect.

The current cifs code must be enhanced (and tested)
to support some more aspects of the older SMB dialect.
With your own special build of cifs you already noticed
the wrong timestamps.

Cheers, Guenter


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] OS/2 client crash on Find Close2

2006-08-08 Thread Guenter Kukkukk

- Original Message - 
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andreas Taegener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] OS/2 client crash on Find Close2


 On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Andreas Taegener wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I have just migrated an old OS/2 file server to a Linux box with Samba
  3.0.23a. Now the OS/2 clients crash from time to time. I found a way to
  reproduce/force the crash using PMMail and did some experiments.
 
  The popuplog.os2 on the clients (Warp4 and eComStation) always names a
  sys3175 in pmshell.exe / doscall1.dll.
 
  Using Ethereal and comparing the network traffic between a) a client
  and the Samba server and b) the same client and an OS/2 server (in this
  setup the client doesn't crash) I found at least one difference in the
  SMB protocol. It is the Find Close2 Response SMB message.

 Kukks - could you please investigate. Sorry, I have to delegate
 OS/2 fixes as I don't have a client setup that's easy to get
 to.

 Thanks,

 Jeremy.

Jeremy, I'll have a look at this later today.
Will drop you a note then.

Guenter


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.22 and OS/2 connectivity

2006-05-16 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Hi Peter,

 cut some stuff
...
  Needless to say whatever I have done to the samba configuration does not
  seem to upset Windows2000 - I can startup my VPC w2k installation and
  have no problems at all accessing the nslu2 shares for reading and
  writing...
 
  I am now starting to wonder if there is something a little flaky as
  regards samba 3.0.22 and OS/2 connectivity? - or is there some secret
  parameter I've missed in the smb.conf file?
 
  Any/All help appreciated.
 
  Pete
  -- 
  To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
  instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
 
  latest samba 3.0.22 does a pretty good job regarding OS/2 connectivity - 
  but,
  as often, there are some pitfalls - additional thougths and checks apply.
  The most basic difference of OS/2 is its usage of 'extended attributes' 
  (EAs).
  Samba can handle EAs pretty well - but _only_, if the used *nix kernel and
  the used file system can handle EAs, too.
  In *nix terms, EAs are called 'xattr'.
  Sorry, the Linksys NSLU2 is new to me - so I had a short look into the 
  specs.
  The specs claim, that 'FAT32', 'NTFS' or 'ext3' can be used...
 
  To _really_ work properly (in all cases), OS/2 needs an EA space of 64KB!
  Even if xattr support is compiled into the kernel - and 'ext3' is enabled 
  (in fstab)
  for xattr usage:
  /dev/hdb6/ext3ext3   acl,user_xattr
  1 2
  xattr limitations of 'ext3' would count. 'ext3' is only able to store about 
  3.9KB EAs!
 
  reiserfs, JFS and XFS are file systems, which support 64KB EAs.


 Sadly ext3 is the filesystem used by the NSLU2 and must be used on the
 1st partition of any disk that the NSLU2 is Unslung to.

 Alternative filesystems do not seem to include jfs (a more natural
 choice for an OS/2 user) or xfs - in fact we are talking fat, fat32 and
 ntfs as alternatives according to this doc
 http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Unslung/R63DiskBehaviour


 
  So, if you _really_ don't need EAs to be stored onto the Linksys samba 
  server, some
  entries in your smb.conf should be checked.
  Think twice - the OS/2 workplace shell is using EAs heavily - so you won't 
  be
  able to use that GUI stuff anyway! (The WPS flags nearly _any_ EA error).


 Maybe I got too used to the fact that the samba 2.?.?? used in the
 Linksys firmware v23r29 worked fine?


 
  Samba3 has some minor glitches, when the used file system does _not_ support
  EAs - but you told it to use EAs in smb.conf.
  (Directories - which are told to contain EAs - might be created, and short 
  lateron an
  error EAS_NOT_SUPPORTED is returned... so then you have that subdir
  created ... but OS/2 got confused...)
 
  Peter, a 1st try to get better results should be
 ea support = no
  in smb.conf


 Extremely Bad move - End of graphical access to the samba shares from an
 OS/2 based system.

 That is Not acceptable.

 I may be able to cope with command line access but I do not expect other
 users here to be able to cope. Access using the network gui is a necessity.

 Based on the above advice I must reconsider whether Unslinging the
 NSLU2 has been a good move. No doubt it brings many improvements - and
 fixes - over the Linksys standard firmware but it also introduces
 problems as regards samba.

 Interestingly I have discussed this problem before when querying the
 behaviour of samba 3.0.11

 The response was:

 I probably fixed all these issues concerning File services with Jeremy
 about release 3.0.16.
 So 3.0.20a shold work fine.


 Looks like the problems have resurfaced in 3.0.22  :-(


  xcopy should behave much more as expected. (still sending expected EA 
  warnings)
  Please post your smb.conf!


 Must admint that there is more than a good possibility that I've got
 something wrong in that file - especially as I now find that I cannot
 open the smb.conf file from my OS/2 system; access denied.

 That is behaviour that has changed since yesterday when I did try some
 fine tuning but I do not see what is causing the access denied as I am
 logged on using an Administrator login.


 The below is copied from the Full View using SWAT - and seems to
 include a lot that is not actually in the smb.conf that I last edited
 using a text editor...

...cut your smb.conf
...

 Thanks

 Pete

Believe me, samba 3.0.22 _is_ doing a really good job regarding os/2 
connectivity. :-)
(And I know, what I talk about ... did hundreds of tests in the past...)

My intention was, to do a step by step approach to solve your needs.
The suggestion to do a 1st try with
ea support = no
in smb.conf was related to your 'xcopy' anomalies, you described before.

Are your xcopy anomalies gone, when you change that in smb.conf?

My guess is, that your kernel and/or ext3 file system does not handle xattr
correctly at all. (== no xattr support available). That is _not_ a samba fault!
To simulate your system, I added a 'ext3noxattr' mount to my linux test 

Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.22 and OS/2 connectivity

2006-05-15 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Hi Peter,

- Original Message - 
From: Peter Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 9:39 PM
Subject: [Samba] samba 3.0.22 and OS/2 connectivity


 Hi All

 I have a Linksys NSLU2 device which is used to hook USB2 drives upto my
 network as network attached storage.

 The Linksys firmware upgrade for this device includes samba 3.0.11 which
 is a non-starter regarding OS/2 connectivity.

 There is an alternative firmware based on the Linksys firmware called
 Unslung from http://www.nslu2-linux.org/

 The Unslung firmware allows unslinging the operating system from
 firmware to disk and allows upgrade and additional packages.

 Having followed the instructions carefully I managed to Unsling the
 NSLU2 and apply the samba 3.0.22 upgrade available for this system.

 After a bit of hunting around I managed to find the smb.conf parameter
 that allows OS/2 based systems to access samba shares and can now read
 from the shares fine.

 What I cannot do is write easily to any of the shares; ie Selecting a
 folder on my local drive and dragging it to a shared folder on the NSLU2
 results in this OS/2  error:-

 SYS0266 : The specified file was not copied


 Inspecting the shared folder reveals that the folder has been created
 but is empty - no file copying performed.


 I investigated command line alternatives to copying files using xcopy
 with some strange results.

 In these screensnaps S: is a mapped drive of the nslu2 share /disk2 aka
 For everyone


 [S:\Pete]xcopy i:\temp temp /s /e /v /h /t /r
 The current target for XCOPY, temp,
 can be a directory or file name and must be specified.  Respond Y
 if the target is a directory or N if the target is a file name.

 Does temp specify a directory (Y/N)? y
 SYS1693: The system cannot create the directory.


 0 file(s) copied.


 [S:\Pete]



 If I make a directory, change to that directory and then perform an
 xcopy it works:-

 [S:\Pete\temp]xcopy j:\temp\* /s /e /v /h /t /r
 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.

 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.


 Source files are being read...

 J:\temp\History.txt
 J:\temp\ide.txt
 J:\temp\OS2_Install.exe
 J:\temp\OS2_UnZip.exe
 J:\temp\WDSibyl.dat

 5 file(s) copied.


 [S:\Pete\temp]



 But if the source contains a subdirectory I get an error and the whole
 process stops:-


 [S:\Pete\temp]md PostArmor

 [S:\Pete\temp]cd PostArmor

 [S:\Pete\temp\PostArmor]xcopy j:\PostArmor\* /s /e /v /h /t /r
 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.

 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.


 Source files are being read...

 SYS1248: A subdirectory or file S:\Pete\temp\PostArmor\docs already exists.


 0 file(s) copied.


 [S:\Pete\temp\PostArmor]



 I tried getting around that error with the xcopy /o parameter:-


 [S:\Pete\temp\PostArmor]xcopy j:\PostArmor\* /s /e /v /h /t /r /o
 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.

 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.


 Source files are being read...

 The extended attributes for the file or directory were
 discarded because the target file system does not support them.

 SYS1248: A subdirectory or file S:\Pete\temp\PostArmor\docs\images
 already exists.


 0 file(s) copied.



 Needless to say whatever I have done to the samba configuration does not
 seem to upset Windows2000 - I can startup my VPC w2k installation and
 have no problems at all accessing the nslu2 shares for reading and
 writing...

 I am now starting to wonder if there is something a little flaky as
 regards samba 3.0.22 and OS/2 connectivity? - or is there some secret
 parameter I've missed in the smb.conf file?

 Any/All help appreciated.

 Pete
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

latest samba 3.0.22 does a pretty good job regarding OS/2 connectivity - but,
as often, there are some pitfalls - additional thougths and checks apply.
The most basic difference of OS/2 is its usage of 'extended attributes' (EAs).
Samba can handle EAs pretty well - but _only_, if the used *nix kernel and
the used file system can handle EAs, too.
In *nix terms, EAs are called 'xattr'.
Sorry, the Linksys NSLU2 is new to me - so I had a short look into the specs.
The specs claim, that 'FAT32', 'NTFS' or 'ext3' can be used...

To _really_ work properly (in all cases), OS/2 needs an EA space of 64KB!
Even if xattr support is compiled into the kernel - and 'ext3' is enabled (in 
fstab)
for xattr usage:
/dev/hdb6

Re: [Samba] NET VIEW equivalent in Samba

2005-12-15 Thread Guenter Kukkukk

- Original Message - 
From: Henrik Zagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:45 PM
Subject: [Samba] NET VIEW equivalent in Samba


 Hi!
 Is there a NET VIEW equivalent in samba?
 I looked at smbclient -L but then I have to know the browser master.
 I only want to specifiy a workgroup..

 Regards,
 Henrik
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Hi Henrik,

'findsmb' is worth a try - but I don't use it! I haven't proved, if it is
still under development at all...
You can also try 'smbtree' (my favourite).
Have a look at the manpage.
Something like the following should initially work:
   smbtree -Uvaliduser%thepassword

Here a user and its password is requested - to 'browse' all the
(allowed) network shares...
You can fine-tune the result (a bit).
Best wishes - Guenter

PS - and always think twice - is there a 'local' or 'master browser'
running - or not? Broadcasts can only reach the local subnet!


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Backup Tape

2005-11-16 Thread Guenter Kukkukk

- Original Message - 
From: Sandy McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:22 AM
Subject: [Samba] Backup Tape


 I am at my final stages of switching my file server from my ageing Novell 
 Netware 5.0 to Linux Suse SLE9. All my workstations are
WinXP and Win2000 so I am relying on samba for file sharing. My last stage to 
resolve is having a backup strategy for the server. I
already have a SCSI HP Dat drive I can install in the server but need some easy 
to use software to back my files. It would need to
be able to keep all the file security and ACL info so if I need to restore any 
files, no further configuration is required. Would I
need a backup solution that accommodates samba? If so, any recommendations on 
what software to use. I only have 10 users and my
current Novell server is only at 15gb so we don't have a heavily used server.

 Has anyone else made the transition from Netware to Linux? In terms of 
 administration, is their anything else I need to look out
for?

 Thanks

 Sandy

 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Hi Sandy,
you mention ACLs - and, if configured so, samba might store some file meta data 
into xattr (extended
attributes). You should take care, that that info (if used) is not getting lost 
during backup/restore.
I found that
http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/
is very helpful regarding ACLs and EAs.
There are some extra notes at the end regarding backup/restore pitfalls and 
possibilities.
Cheers, Guenter Kukkukk


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba and ACL's

2005-01-19 Thread Guenter Kukkukk

Hello Travis,


 Hey All,

 I am trying to get Samba to work with winbind and ACL's on Fedora Core 2. So
 far so good as far as getting winbind to work with Samba but I am having
 trouble getting Samba to recognize ACL's. I am wondering if there is a
 command I can run to determine if my Samba install is ACL capable...

 Any ideas?

 Cheers,

 Travis

 -- 

to use ACLs, the filesystem, on which your samba shares are located,
must support xattr (extended attributes).
If your kernel is compiled right and the used filesystem is mounted right,
you should get xattr support.
  - ext3 supports xattr of max. size about 3.9 kB
  - reiserfs allows xattr size of max. 64 kB

On SuSE 9.1, 9.2 systems xattr support is available out of the box.
On other distributions you might need to ask in their own mailing lists
or newsgroups.
Below i append an excerpt from samba 4.0 howto.txt (written by
A. Tridgell). Those suggested checks should also apply to xattr support
on samba 3.0.x.
Best wishes - Guenter

-- excerpt from samba 4.0 howto.txt --

NOTE about filesystem support
-

To use the advanced features of Samba4 you need a filesystem that
supports both the user and system xattr namespaces.

If you run Linux with a 2.6 kernel and ext3 this means you need to
include the option user_xattr in your /etc/fstab. For example:

/dev/hda3   /home ext3user_xattr 1 1

You also need to compile your kernel with the XATTR and SECURITY
options for your filesystem. For ext3 that means you need:

   CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y
   CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y

If you don't have a filesystem with xattr support, then you can
simulate it by using the option:

   posix:eadb = /usr/local/samba/eadb.tdb

that will place all extra file attributes (NT ACLs, DOS EAs, streams
etc), in that tdb. It is not efficient, and doesn't scale well, but at
least it gives you a choice when you don't have a modern filesystem.

Testing your filesystem
---

To test your filesystem support, install the 'attr' package and run
the following 4 commands as root:

  touch test.txt
  setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt
  setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt
  getfattr -d test.txt
  getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt

You should see output like this:

  # file: test.txt
  user.test=test

  # file: test.txt
  security.test=test2

If you get any Operation not supported errors then it means your
kernel is not configured correctly, or your filesystem is not mounted
with the right options.

If you get any Operation not permitted errors then it probably means
you didn't try the test as root.

-- end of excerpt from samba 4.0 howto.txt--


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 + eCS (os/2)

2005-01-06 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Hello Dietrich,

 Hi,

 I use eCS as client for samba. with samba 2.2.x I have never problems
 after configuration. With update my server from  suse 8.1 to 9.1 was
 also samba changed from 2.2.x to 3.0.x. Since this I have only truble.
 max protocol lanman1 works without problems, only .. I have no longnames.
 The docs says, lanman1 is the first with long names support, also not
 about the pm (desktop from os2). With lanman2 (or higher) I see
 longnames in the commandline. I can save/create files, I can not copy
 this this commanline tools, only read and save as. no access about the pm,

 No Ideas, only dowgrade to Samba 2.2.x, this maks other truble with my wine.

 Dietrich

a lot of work has been done by the samba team during the last weeks, to
get eCS / OS/2 working right with _samba 4.0_.
Samba 4.0 is the upcoming new version - a more or less complete re-write
of samba with many, many  new features
The 4.0 release date is unknown at the moment.
A. Tridgell: ... it will be released, when it is ready for release...
If you need further information, you can also contact me directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cheers, Guenter

btw - two samba - os/2 related IRC channels have been setup on irc.freenode.net
#samba-os2
#samba-os2-technical
Everyone should feel free to join those channels - it's not too crowded there 
at the moment. :-)


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Samba 3.0.4 and DOS 6.2.2 - MSDOS Copy problem

2004-11-16 Thread Guenter Kukkukk

- Original Message - 
From: Craig Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Samba 3.0.4 and DOS 6.2.2 - MSDOS Copy problem


 It also works for me on Win98,NT,W2K and XP. Only having problems on
 DOS 6.2.2. Unfortunately we are still stuck using DOS 6.2.2 on some
 machines because we have programs that do not work on DOS 7 and up. So
 it would be nice to get this working.

 So is there a different COPY command that we could use? I have found
 that XCOPY works but it has an annoying prompt that you have to answer
 telling it whether the file is a file or directory. I can also use TYPE
 FILENAME.DAT  NEWFILE.DAT

 Thanks


Hi Craig,
could you (temporarely) set the samba debuglevel to 10?

smbcontrol smbd debug 10

and redo your copy?

Then post that part of your samba logfile, please.
Cheers,
Guenter


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba + OS/2 LS read error

2004-10-22 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
- Original Message - 
From: Alex Masterov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject: [Samba] Samba + OS/2 LS read error


 Hello!

 We have Samba 3.0.7 on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE, installed from FreeBSD
 ports as server.

 There is PC with OS/2 Warp Server for E-Business (Aurora) in our LAN,
 it uses shared resourses from Samba.

 Problem: while OS/2 PC archives directories from network drives (from
 Samba) archivation freezes on random file about a minute, and then
 breaks with Read error. The same effect exists while using DBF
 databases on network drives from DOS FoxPro programs (returns File read
 error).

 In the moment of freezing archivation, the message Invalid secondary
 trans2 packet appears in the log.

 In Samba 2.2.8a on RedHat 7.3 everything is OK.
 Other computers in the network work without this problem.

 Here is smb.log (log level 3)
 
 [2004/10/22 15:10:03, 0] smbd/trans2.c:reply_trans2(4110)
reply_trans2: Invalid secondary trans2 packet
 [2004/10/22 15:10:03, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(145)
error packet at smbd/trans2.c(4293) cmd=50 (SMBtrans2) eclass=1 ecode=87
 [2004/10/22 15:10:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1092)
Transaction 434366 of length 2339
 [2004/10/22 15:10:03, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(887)
switch message SMBtranss2 (pid 35438) conn 0x8325800

 [skip]

 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1332)
timeout_processing: End of file from client (client has disconnected).
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(571)
Closing connections
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837)
bbs (192.168.1.204) closed connection to service foru
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69)
Yielding connection to foru
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837)
bbs (192.168.1.204) closed connection to service forr
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69)
Yielding connection to forr
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837)
bbs (192.168.1.204) closed connection to service forp
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69)
Yielding connection to forp
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(262)
alex closed file TEMP/data_pr/FK_ZAKAZ/DATA/zakaztov.dbf (numopen=0)
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837)
bbs (192.168.1.204) closed connection to service forl
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69)
Yielding connection to forl
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837)
bbs (192.168.1.204) closed connection to service fork
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69)
Yielding connection to fork
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69)
Yielding connection to
 [2004/10/22 15:11:12, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(614)
Server exit (normal exit)
 [2004/10/22 15:11:13, 2] param/loadparm.c:do_section(3407)
Processing section [homes]
 

 On the client side:
 
 [...]
 AddingL:\TEMP\data_pr\FK_ZAKAZ\DATA\zakaztov.cdx  OK
 AddingL:\TEMP\data_pr\FK_ZAKAZ\DATA\zakaztov.dbf  15%
 Read error in the file L:\TEMP\data_pr\FK_ZAKAZ\DATA\zakaztov.dbf
 Program aborted

 [G:\Archives\testarc]echo   | time
 Current time is: 15:11:13,29
 

 Here is my smb.conf
 
 [global]
 workgroup = HELMI
 server string = Samba Server %v on %L
 security = user
 hosts allow = 192.168. 212.94.111.33
 load printers = yes
 admin users = root, van, alex
 printing = bsd
 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
 max log size = 5
 passdb backend = tdbsam
 include = /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.%m
 

[Samba] samba 3.06rc2, suse 64amd and os2

2004-08-22 Thread Guenter Kukkukk
Hi,

when I tried to connect our SuSE 9.1 linux server running
samba-3.0.5.1 to our anchient - but still pretty well running -
OS/2 Warpserver, I ran into a lot of troubles.

So I had a closer look into the samba-sources and with the
help of ethereal I found some bugs, which made it impossible
to talk to the OS/2 Warpserver, which is running the
LANMAN2.1-protocol:

On 30.07.2004 I posted a bug in the LANMAN2.1 session setup code:
Summary: LANMAN2 protocol (and lower)  broken in samba-3.x
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1571

This bug has already been fixed in 3.0.5.x by Andrew Bartlett.

From now on the two machines were able to setup a session,
but the linux machine was still not able to send any data to the
Warpserver.

Further investigation lead to another bug-report on 7.08.2004:
Summary: Any writing and spooling to LANMAN2 server broken (OS/2
Warpserver)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590

This really strange looking bug *is still unresolved* - may be I should
raise it to critical

I did all the changes to the 3.0.5.1 source locally on my linux
machine - recompiled and installed it.
Now all is working as expected!

Best wishes.
Guenter Kukkukk

-- 
Günter Kukkukk
Entwicklungsbüro f. Informationstechnologien
Damaschkestraße 24
D-10711 Berlin

Tel.   +49 30 327 024 50

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba