[Samba] Problems using admin users option on share
Hello, I have set the admin users option on my share in the following manner: clip [augusta_vol1] comment = L: Drive path = /home/augusta_vol1 create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 admin users = stuttle hide unreadable = no writable = Yes vfs objects = recycle recycle:repository = .recycle/%U recycle:keeptree = yes recycle:versions = yes recycle:touch = yes clip. I am trying to access the following files and get access denied in windows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] augusta_vol1]# ll total 584 drwx---r-x 36 root root 4096 Oct 11 2003 APPS drwx-- 18 root root 4096 Oct 13 2003 CLIP52 drwx---r-x 92 root root 8192 Feb 24 2004 COMMON drwx--2 root root 4096 Oct 11 2003 GROUPS drwx--9 lwilson hr 24576 Jun 4 10:56 HRPR drwx--5 root root 4096 Oct 13 2003 PROGRAM drwxrwx--- 34 lbateman it 4096 Jun 23 13:32 SBA Image Files -rwxr-1 root root 210704 Sep 22 14:12 SRVMGR.EXE drwx---r-x 91 root root 8192 Oct 13 10:29 USERS -rwxr-1 root root 305936 Sep 22 14:12 USRMGR.EXE drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Jan 1 1980 WINAPPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] augusta_vol1]# I cannot access CLIP52 GROUPS HRPR PROGRAM SRVMGR.EXE USERMGR.EXE The other folder I can get into because of the r-x on the world portion but I was hoping admin users would let me go everywhere.. Any ideas... Thanks Spencer Tuttle American Investment Bank -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Weird issue with Windows 2003 server connecting to samba
Dear all, Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to fix the following conundrum We have the following setup Using samba version 2.2.8 on a server with three network cards 192.168.0.241/24 10/100 Local network for administration 192.168.10.241/24 10/100 ASP client network 192.168.11.241/24 Fibre network for link to websites and data backups Samba server is configured to use all 3 interfaces. Linked to this server we have a Windows 2000 server 192.168.0.254/24 10/100 Local network for administration 192.168.11.254/24 Fibre network for link from websites and data backups X.X.X.254 Public ip address for web access There is an entry in winnt/system32/drivers/etc/hosts that points to the 192.168.11.241 address of the samba server. On this box all requests from the website to the samba server connect , as they should, through the fibre network. Here is where the problem begins We have added a windows 2003 server to run websites configured as follows 192.168.0.250/24 10/100 Local network for administration 192.168.11.250/24 Fibre network for link from websites and data backups X.X.X.254 Public ip address for web access There is an entry in winnt/system32/drivers/etc/hosts that points to the 192.168.11.241 address of the samba server. Connections from this server choose any interface i=on the windows server to make the connection, chosen randomly from all three. We have changed the bind order of the network cards to place the fibre card as the first card. We have entered manual metrics, assigning 1 to the fibre card and 20 to the other 2 cards. We have added a persistant static route to the samba server through the fibre interface card. None of this makes any difference. The windows server still randomly selects an interface to connect through. We have tried re-installing the operating system on another server, just incase, but this produces the same results. We need to tie this to the fibre network for performance. Any ideas on what to try to fix this would be appreciated Spencer Clark Legal Disclaimer: Internet communications are not secure and therefore we as a company do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company unless otherwise specifically stated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Legal Disclaimer: Internet communications are not secure and therefore we as a company do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company unless otherwise specifically stated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Weird issue with Windows 2003 server
Dear all, Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to fix the following conundrum We have the following setup Using samba version 2.2.8 on a server with three network cards 192.168.0.241/24 10/100 Local network for administration 192.168.10.241/24 10/100 ASP client network 192.168.11.241/24 Fibre network for link to websites and data backups Samba server is configured to use all 3 interfaces. Linked to this server we have a Windows 2000 server 192.168.0.254/24 10/100 Local network for administration 192.168.11.254/24 Fibre network for link from websites and data backups X.X.X.254 Public ip address for web access There is an entry in winnt/system32/drivers/etc/hosts that points to the 192.168.11.241 address of the samba server. On this box all requests from the website to the samba server connect , as they should, through the fibre network. Here is where the problem begins We have added a windows 2003 server to run websites configured as follows 192.168.0.250/24 10/100 Local network for administration 192.168.11.250/24 Fibre network for link from websites and data backups X.X.X.254 Public ip address for web access There is an entry in winnt/system32/drivers/etc/hosts that points to the 192.168.11.241 address of the samba server. Connections from this server choose any interface i=on the windows server to make the connection, chosen randomly from all three. We have changed the bind order of the network cards to place the fibre card as the first card. We have entered manual metrics, assigning 1 to the fibre card and 20 to the other 2 cards. We have added a persistant static route to the samba server through the fibre interface card. None of this makes any difference. The windows server still randomly selects an interface to connect through. We have tried re-installing the operating system on another server, just incase, but this produces the same results. We need to tie this to the fibre network for performance. Any ideas on what to try to fix this would be appreciated Spencer Clark Legal Disclaimer: Internet communications are not secure and therefore we as a company do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company unless otherwise specifically stated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba LDIF for a computer account
Could someone post an LDIF for a computer account? I am wondering if I need to have a sambaPrimaryGroupSID entry? I am wondering because smbldap-useradd.pl -w workstn$ doesnt do it. Thanks, Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] inetOrgPerson vs. sambaSidEntry for Computer accounts in LDAP
I am looking at my computer accounts that were created using smbldap-useradd.pl -w workstationname. And I see the following objectClasses: top inetOrgPerson posixAccount sambaSamAccount I understand I need one structural objectClass, but don't understand why inetOrgPerson is being used. Couldn't I use sambaSidEntry instead? sambaSidEntry is structural, and only requires sambaSID. Any insight is welcome. Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] inetOrgPerson vs. sambaSidEntry for Computer accounts in LDAP
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Spencer wrote: | I am looking at my computer accounts that were created using | smbldap-useradd.pl -w workstationname. And I see the following | objectClasses: | top | inetOrgPerson | posixAccount | sambaSamAccount | | I understand I need one structural objectClass, but don't | understand why inetOrgPerson is being used. Couldn't I | use sambaSidEntry instead? sambaSidEntry is structural, and | only requires sambaSID. it is by convention since a user normally has other attributes that are desiured such as email, telephone number, etc... I understand using inetOrgPerson for my user accounts, but for the computer accounts seems a little strange. Its not going to break anything changing from inetOrgPerson to sambaSidEntry will it? Solely for the computer accounts. Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] network browserlist error(S)..
Collen wrote: G'day.. just haveing the straingest problem.. I'd upgraded to the 302rc1 version. i configed it to be an pdc controller, with wins to manage our local domain.. only when browsing the domain list. it gives error(s) once in a while.. An extended error has occured the system cannot find massage text for message number 0x in the message file for \\hostname I get this same error running 3.01 I have a PDC and multiple BDC's. The PDC has os level = 33 preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes local master = yes wins support = yes My BDC's have os level = 32 preferred master = no domain master = no domain logons = yes local master = no wins server = ip.address.of.bdc This is a problem because I have shares on some Windows 2000 SP4 servers that my users cannot get to, I have to reboot the server for it to work. Is there someone who knows what is going on here or a suggestion to fix it? this is when you try to acces a computer or share for a win2k box, it happens 10 out of 100 times.. on a linux box, log.smb reports: lib/util_sock.c:matchname(941) sys_gethostname(host.domain): lookup failure lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_name(1008) matchname failed os host.domain 192.168.x.x the pdc is the master browser with smb.conf os level = 66 preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes local master = yes wins support = yes with 300 version i have no problems, from 301rc1 the error starts.. sugestions ?? solutions ..?? l8r Collen Blijenberg MLHJ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] integrating active directory with samba 3.0
Hi can some please help me integrate samba 3.0 with active directory. I'm very confused about this process so far my research led me to the following article http://asia.cnet.com/itmanager/netadmin/0,39006400,39081966,00.htm. However other research led me to the use of winbind for this setup. The confusing thing is that the article did not mention winbind. I would like to have it where we maintain one set of user accounts that we create in our active directory database we use both windows 2000 and 2003 server. With this single login users will be able to login to redhat Linux boxes with there same login name that they use to login to there windows workstations. This login will also give them access to samba share on our redhat 9.0 server. Any help with this would be much appreciated. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Browsing and BDC +LDAP
Hello everybody. I have two questions today. I am in the middle of moving my NT4 domain over to SAMBA 3.0 with ldap. I get some errors while I am browsing computers in the new SAMBA domain. For example \\it1132 is not available. You might not have permissions to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. An internal Windows 2000 error occurred. I will also get the same message with this new error. The system cannot find the message text for message number 0x%1 in the message file for %2. Strange eh? I am later able to go back to that same workstation and click it again then it works. My second question is one that I have seen pop up on the list occasionally but have never seen a definitive answer. When using a BDC what do I use for the ldap admin dn = ? The BDC is also a Slave LDAP server and the ldapsam is pointing to localhost. I have heard that you should not use the manager dn, but should use the updatedn specified in the slapd.conf file. This error might be caused by the above question. On my BDC's I occasionally see these errors. [2004/01/07 21:53:55, 1] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_modify_entry(1173) ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to modify user dn= uid=troon$,ou=Computers,dc=aib,dc=com with: No such attribute modify: delete values failed [2004/01/07 21:53:55, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1366) ldapsam_update_sam_account: failed to modify user with uid = troon$, error: modify: delete values failed (Success) Any ideas? Thanks a million everyone. Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] CUPS + SAMBA3 +attempt_nebios_session_request:
Hello everyone, When anyone of my users prints to a CUPS printer shared on a SAMBA 3 I get the following error in the log of the machine creating the printjob. I am running the following software SAMBA-3.0.1rc2 and CUPS-1.1.17-13 with the following config: [global] ... printing = cups . [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printer admin = @it guest ok = Yes printable = Yes use client driver = Yes browseable = No Cups printers are RAW Printers. [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(1496) attempt_netbios_session_request: AJENSEN rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Called name not present [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595) spoolss_connect_to_client: machine AJENSEN rejected the NetBIOS session request. [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(1496) attempt_netbios_session_request: AJENSEN rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Called name not present [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595) spoolss_connect_to_client: machine AJENSEN rejected the NetBIOS session request. [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(1496) attempt_netbios_session_request: AJENSEN rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Called name not present [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595) spoolss_connect_to_client: machine AJENSEN rejected the NetBIOS session request. [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(1496) attempt_netbios_session_request: AJENSEN rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Called name not present [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595) spoolss_connect_to_client: machine AJENSEN rejected the NetBIOS session request. [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(1496) attempt_netbios_session_request: AJENSEN rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Called name not present [2003/12/12 08:57:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595) spoolss_connect_to_client: machine AJENSEN rejected the NetBIOS session request. Thanks in advance, Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] CUPS + SAMBA3 +attempt_nebios_session_request:
That was exactly the problem, in my haste in removing Novell from the users machine I must have removed file and printer sharing as well which provides the server service. Thank You Jerry. I have one more error that only happened when I upgraded to SAMBA-3.0.1rc2. Usually I remember seeing files under /var/cache/samba. There is nothing there now. And I am receiving the following error in my machine logs: [2003/12/12 09:52:58, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:init_group_mapping(139) Failed to open group mapping database [2003/12/12 09:52:58, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:get_group_from_gid(655) failed to initialize group mappingFailed to open group mapping database [2003/12/12 09:52:58, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:get_group_from_gid(655) failed to initialize group mappingFailed to open group mapping database [2003/12/12 09:52:58, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:get_group_from_gid(655) failed to initialize group mappingget_alias_user_groups: gid of user ajensen doesn't exist. Check your /etc/passwd and /etc/group files [2003/12/12 09:53:01, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705) All of my groups are defined in LDAP, including my SAMBA Group Mappings. I am thinking it has something to do with the missing files under /var/cache/samba. Can anyone help me out? Thanks, Spencer Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Spencer wrote: When anyone of my users prints to a CUPS printer shared on a SAMBA 3 I get the following error in the log of the machine creating the printjob. I am running the following software SAMBA-3.0.1rc2 and CUPS-1.1.17-13 with the following config: [global] ... printing = cups . [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printer admin = @it guest ok = Yes printable = Yes use client driver = Yes browseable = No Cups printers are RAW Printers. rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2595) spoolss_connect_to_client: machine AJENSEN rejected the NetBIOS session request. This is for the print change notify backchannel. Either you have disabled the server service on the clients or perhaps have the XP firewall enabled. - -- cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/2fCQIR7qMdg1EfYRAgNcAKCRf5EIJiAq21wQkGrA8f1p/hS0NwCfSlBK 8254yavHyOCcqqBHG0BV9+M= =J+Oa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Bummer of an error.
I am getting a bummer of an error. In user manager I can sucessfully modify users including group membership. But when I double click on the groups (on the second pane below the users) and try to add or delete a user from a group I get this error The group name could not be found. The scripts are defined in my smb.conf as follows add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '%u' '%g' delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -x '%u' '%g' I can run /usr/local/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m spencer Test and it does the add to ldap and the delete works well too. But in user manager its broken. Anyone have any ideas? I am willing to try anything, a level 10 log is too much information to parse through, but if I know what to look for its easier. Thanks, Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] rpmbuild -bb samba3.spec
Hello, When I try to build using rpmbuild --bb samba3.spec after installing the SRPM and modifing the samba3.spec and adding --with-acl-support my RPM file comes out to be just over 52 megs. How can I strip it down to be the regular size? I remember rebuilding from SRPM and it created a debug rpm as well. It didnt do that this time. Any ideas. Spencer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Building from Source RPM
When i build from a source RPM with the command rpmbuild -bb samba3.spec my rpm ends up to be 52 megs. This is on redhat 9 If I do the exact same thing on my fedora core 1 box it creates a 19 meg rpm and a 200+ meg debug rpm. Any ideas on how to make the rpm from the redhat 9 box be smaller? Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba works GREAT with these exceptions...
Hello everyone. I think Samba is wonderful. I have a full domain running here using ldap servers as the back end. The PDC connects to the master LDAP server while the BDC's do localhost lookups as they are slave LDAP servers. The following are snippets of logs that are appearing on my syslog host. Error is on top explanation below. Could anyone point me in the right direction? I am running samba 3.0.1pre3-1 Samba is built from SRPM with --acl-support added. I understand this is a lot of info, nevertheless I have a successful installation running and am having great fun removing Novell from the corporation and replacing it with open-source software. [2003/12/08 12:34:36, 0] smbd/connection.c:register_message_flags(220) register_message_flags: tdb_fetch failed I have no idea what this message means... That comes from one of my BDC's [2003/12/08 12:34:42, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcat_fn(629) ERROR: string overflow by 1 in safe_strcat [/] This comes when i am running the vfs object = recycle and deleting a file. [2003/12/08 12:38:41, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1366) ldapsam_update_sam_account: failed to modify user with uid = nortel$, error: modify: add values failed (Success) This comes from another BDC. [2003/12/08 12:51:14, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(800) smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root.. [2003/12/08 12:51:14, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1639) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (Insufficient access) This comes from a BDC [2003/12/08 13:25:33, 0] modules/vfs_recycle.c:recycle_do_touch(316) recycle: touching .recycle/aoreno/SBA/EVERYONE/Angela/Excel/Copy #1 of sba rec 3rd q 2003.xls~RFf42f79.TMP failed, reason = Operation not permitted Another recycle problem. [2003/12/08 10:13:43, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(342) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host This comes from my PDC [2003/12/08 13:34:25, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(919) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2003/12/08 13:34:26, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2003/12/08 13:34:26, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 16: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer [2003/12/08 13:34:26, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585) Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer) And finally output from a BDC The PDC's testparm output is the following [global] workgroup = SAMBA server string = AIB File Server passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ip of masterldap server:389 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 500 time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -m '%u' delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl '%u' add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd.pl -p '%g' delete group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupdel.pl '%g' add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '%u' '%g' delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -x '%u' '%g' set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod.pl -g '%g' '%u' add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w -d /dev/null -g computer -C 'Machine Account' -s /bin/false %u logon path = \\bluestar\profiles\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 33 preferred master = No local master = No domain master = Yes wins support = Yes ldap suffix = dc=aib,dc=com ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers,dc=aib,dc=com ldap user suffix = ou=People,dc=aib,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=Groups,dc=aib,dc=com ldap idmap suffix = dc=aib,dc=com,dc=aib,dc=com ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=aib,dc=com ldap ssl = no ldap passwd sync = Yes printing = cups It is pointing to the master LDAP server, and my 2 BDC's look like this [global] workgroup = SAMBA server string = AIF Server passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1:389 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -m '%u' delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl '%u' add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd.pl -p '%g' delete group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupdel.pl '%g' add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '%u' '%g' delete user from group script =
[Samba] Attempt to compile samba 3.0.0 on OpenServer 5.0.6
Hello,
We are trying to compile Samba3.0.0 on OpenServer 5.0.6 with gcc2.95.2
and when running make we get the following message.
checking configure summary... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating include/stamp-h
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating script/findsmb
config.status: creating smbadduser
config.status: creating script/gen-8bit-gap.sh
config.status: creating include/config.h
# make
Using FLAGS = -g -O2 -I./popt -Iinclude
-I/u/samba-dev/samba-3.0.0/source/inclu
de -I/u/samba-dev/samba-3.0.0/source/ubiqx
-I/u/samba-dev/samba-3.0.0/source/smb
wrapper -I. -I/u/samba-dev/samba-3.0.0/source
LIBS = -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl_s
LDSHFLAGS = -shared
LDFLAGS =
Generating smbd/build_options.c
nawk: error compiling regular expression /^/\* (.*?)\*//: *?+ not
preceded by va
lid expression
source line 116 of file
/u/samba-dev/samba-3.0.0/source/script/mkbuildoptions.a
wk
context is
/^\/\* (.*?)\*\// {
*** Error code 2 (bu21)
Does anyone have a suggestion as to how I can overcome this issue.
(I have compiles Samba3.0.0 successfully on Unixware 7.1.3 from the same
download , if this is relevant ?)
Kind regards
Spencer Clark
Legal Disclaimer:
Internet communications are not secure and therefore we as a company do
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views
or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company unless otherwise specifically stated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
