[Samba] About s3fs in samba4

2012-08-17 Thread felix

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is
set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs
later, right?
So I have a couple of questions:

- What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations?
- If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs
later, should I select ntvfs???

Best regards,
Felix

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] About s3fs in samba4

2012-08-17 Thread Gémes Géza

2012-08-17 17:31 keltezéssel, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu írta:

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is
set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs
later, right?
So I have a couple of questions:

- What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations?
- If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs
later, should I select ntvfs???

Best regards,
Felix

If you use s3fs, the only thing you may need to do (first test if it is 
still necessary it was with the git version a week ago) is to give group 
Domain Admins, full access to the sysvol share (and recursively all 
subfolders) from a Windows domain member computer (loged in of course as 
a member of the Domain Admins group).
The major problem with ntvfs is that it isn't actively developed anymore 
and hasn't received those protocol dialect updates (smb2-3) which were 
introduced in Vista and 7, and thus it may have compatibility problems 
later (no known problem exist so far)


Regards

Geza Gemes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] About s3fs in samba4

2012-08-17 Thread felix
 2012-08-17 17:31 keltezéssel, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu írta:
 Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is
 set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs
 later, right?
 So I have a couple of questions:

 - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations?
 - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change
 GPOs
 later, should I select ntvfs???

 Best regards,
 Felix

 If you use s3fs, the only thing you may need to do (first test if it is
 still necessary it was with the git version a week ago) is to give group
 Domain Admins, full access to the sysvol share (and recursively all
 subfolders) from a Windows domain member computer (loged in of course as
 a member of the Domain Admins group).
 The major problem with ntvfs is that it isn't actively developed anymore
 and hasn't received those protocol dialect updates (smb2-3) which were
 introduced in Vista and 7, and thus it may have compatibility problems
 later (no known problem exist so far)

 Regards

 Geza Gemes
 --

Thanks a lot for your answer!
I'll give it a try to s3fs.

Best regards,
Felix.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] About s3fs in samba4

2012-08-17 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 20:14 +0200, Gémes Géza wrote:
 2012-08-17 17:31 keltezéssel, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu írta:
  Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is
  set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs
  later, right?
  So I have a couple of questions:
 
  - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations?
  - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs
  later, should I select ntvfs???
 
  Best regards,
  Felix
 
 If you use s3fs, the only thing you may need to do (first test if it is 
 still necessary it was with the git version a week ago) is to give group 
 Domain Admins, full access to the sysvol share (and recursively all 
 subfolders) from a Windows domain member computer (loged in of course as 
 a member of the Domain Admins group).
 The major problem with ntvfs is that it isn't actively developed anymore 
 and hasn't received those protocol dialect updates (smb2-3) which were 
 introduced in Vista and 7, and thus it may have compatibility problems 
 later (no known problem exist so far)

Thanks Geza Gemes!  This describes the issue and workaround very nicely!

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba