Re: [Samba] Question about how to reduce samba 3.3.3 install size or why it has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3

2009-04-19 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 03:06:36AM +0200, vot...@gmx.de wrote:
 Hello,
 
 can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba 
 executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. 
 smbd  3.5MB - ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for our project 
 to keep the size as small as possible. You can have a look into the 
 makefile here: 
 http://freenas.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freenas/experimental/samba3/Makefile?revision=4553view=markup
 
 Any tip would be great. Maybe i did not realize a magic configure switch???

Probably a good piece of that is the autogenerated RPC
marshalling in librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_*.c. This is required for
quite a few of the binaries, so it might be possible to put
those into a shared library and so reduce the overall size
of the binaries. There's no magic switch for this however,
sorry.

Volker


pgp4v4TGO4ugf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Question about how to reduce samba 3.3.3 install size or why it has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3

2009-04-19 Thread vot...@gmx.de

Volker Lendecke wrote:

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 03:06:36AM +0200, vot...@gmx.de wrote:
  

Hello,

can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba 
executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. 
smbd  3.5MB - ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for our project 
to keep the size as small as possible. You can have a look into the 
makefile here: 
http://freenas.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freenas/experimental/samba3/Makefile?revision=4553view=markup


Any tip would be great. Maybe i did not realize a magic configure switch???



Probably a good piece of that is the autogenerated RPC
marshalling in librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_*.c. This is required for
quite a few of the binaries, so it might be possible to put
those into a shared library and so reduce the overall size
of the binaries. There's no magic switch for this however,
sorry.

Volker
  
Is it possible that there are added features in 3.3.3 automatically that 
aren't available in 3.0.34? Maybe i can switch them off? I compared the 
configure scripts of both versions but did not see great differences.
I can't understand what blows up the code so much, was there a great 
change in the code base of 3.2.x and 3.3.x?


Regards
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] Question about how to reduce samba 3.3.3 install size or why it has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3

2009-04-18 Thread vot...@gmx.de

Hello,

can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba 
executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. 
smbd  3.5MB - ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for our project 
to keep the size as small as possible. You can have a look into the 
makefile here: 
http://freenas.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freenas/experimental/samba3/Makefile?revision=4553view=markup


Any tip would be great. Maybe i did not realize a magic configure switch???

Thanks  Regards
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba